Case Report: Preemptive Treatment With Low-Dose PD-1 Blockade and Azacitidine for Molecular Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia With RUNX1-RUNX1T1 After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Application of prophylactic or pre-emptive therapy after allogeneic transplantation for high-risk patients with t(8;21) acute myeloid leukemia

OBJECTIVES

To determine the impact of pretransplant measurable residual disease (pre-MRD) and the efficacy of maintenance therapy in t(8;21) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 100 t(8;21) AML patients who underwent allo-HCT between 2013 and 2022. 40 patients received pre-emptive therapy including immunosuppressant adjustment, azacitidine, and donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) combined with chemotherapy. 23 patients received prophylactic therapy, including azacitidine or chidamide.

RESULTS

Patients with a positive pre-MRD (pre-MRDpos) had a higher 3-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) (25.90% [95% CI, 13.87%-39.70%] vs 5.00% [95% CI, 0.88%-15.01%]; P = 0.008). Pre-MRDpos patients were less likely to have a superior 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) (40.83% [95% CI, 20.80%-80.16%]) if their MRD was still positive at 28 days after transplantation (post-MRD₂₈pos). The 3-year DFS and CIR were 53.17% (95% CI, 38.31% - 73.80%) and 34.87% (95% CI, 18.84% - 51.44%), respectively, for patients receiving pre-emptive interventions after molecular relapse. The 3-year DFS and CIR were 90.00% (95%CI, 77.77% - 100%) and 5.00% (95%CI, 0.31% - 21.10%), respectively, for high-risk patients receiving prophylactic therapy. In most patients, epigenetic-drug-induced adverse events were reversible with dose adjustment or temporary discontinuation.

CONCLUSION

Patients with pre-MRDpos and post-MRD₂₈pos were more likely to have higher rates of relapse and inferior DFS, even after receiving pre-emptive interventions. Prophylactic therapy may be a better option for high-risk t(8;21) AML patients; however, this warrants further investigation.

Safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

The immune system plays a major role in preventing infections and cancers. Impairment in immunity may facilitate the development of neoplasia owing to defective immune surveillance, among other mechanisms. Immune evasion plays a significant role in relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT); one purported mechanism is through immune checkpoint signaling pathways. Checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) are FDA approved for relapsed classical Hodgkin's Lymphoma (cHL), primary mediastinal large B cell Lymphoma (PMBCL) and other solid tumors. Retrospective studies evaluating the outcomes of alloHCT after prior exposure to CPIs showed favorable survival outcomes but high rates of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD); the risk appears to be lower when using post-transplant cyclophosphamide as GVHD prophylaxis. CPIs have increasingly been used to prevent or treat post-alloHCT relapse. Available data, albeit limited, supports the clinical activity of CPIs in post-alloHCT relapse; however, serious and even fatal cases of GVHD have been reported. The optimal timing, schedule, dosing, and patients likely to benefit from this strategy are yet to be identified. In this review, we highlight the immune system's role in cancer surveillance and relapse prevention and discuss the current clinical evidence of CPIs use in post-alloHCT relapse.

Phase II trial of hypomethylating agent combined with nivolumab for acute myeloid leukaemia relapse after allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation-Immune signature correlates with response

Acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) relapse after allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is often driven by immune-related mechanisms and associated with poor prognosis. Immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with hypomethylating agents (HMA) may restore or enhance the graft-versus-leukaemia effect. Still, data about using this combination regimen after allo-HCT are limited. We conducted a prospective, phase II, open-label, single-arm study in which we treated patients with haematological AML relapse after allo-HCT with HMA plus the anti-PD-1 antibody nivolumab. The response was correlated with DNA-, RNA- and protein-based single-cell technology assessments to identify biomarkers associated with therapeutic efficacy. Sixteen patients received a median number of 2 (range 1-7) nivolumab applications. The overall response rate (CR/PR) at day 42 was 25%, and another 25% of the patients achieved stable disease. The median overall survival was 15.6 months. High-parametric cytometry documented a higher frequency of activated (ICOS+ , HLA-DR+ ), low senescence (KLRG1- , CD57- ) CD8+ effector T cells in responders. We confirmed these findings in a preclinical model. Single-cell transcriptomics revealed a pro-inflammatory rewiring of the expression profile of T and myeloid cells in responders. In summary, the study indicates that the post-allo-HCT HMA/nivolumab combination induces anti-AML immune responses in selected patients and could be considered as a bridging approach to a second allo-HCT. Trial-registration: EudraCT-No. 2017-002194-18.

Progress of research on PD-1/PD-L1 in leukemia

Leukemia cells prevent immune system from clearing tumor cells by inducing the immunosuppression of the bone marrow (BM) microenvironment. In recent years, further understanding of the BM microenvironment and immune landscape of leukemia has resulted in the introduction of several immunotherapies, including checkpoint inhibitors, T-cell engager, antibody drug conjugates, and cellular therapies in clinical trials. Among them, the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) axis is a significant checkpoint for controlling immune responses, the PD-1 receptor on tumor-infiltrating T cells is bound by PD-L1 on leukemia cells. Consequently, the activation of tumor reactive T cells is inhibited and their apoptosis is promoted, preventing the rejection of the tumor by immune system and thus resulting in the occurrence of immune tolerance. The PD-1/PD-L1 axis serves as a significant mechanism by which tumor cells evade immune surveillance, and PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors have been approved for the treatment of lymphomas and varieties of solid tumors. However, the development of drugs targeting PD-1/PD-L1 in leukemia remains in the clinical-trial stage. In this review, we tally up the basic research and clinical trials on PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in leukemia, as well as discuss the relevant toxicity and impacts of PD-1/PD-L1 on other immunotherapies such as hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, bi-specific T-cell engager, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell immunotherapy.

PD-1 Checkpoint Blockade in Patients for Acute Myeloid Leukemia after HSCT Relapse Resulted in Severe GVHD and sHLH

Treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) such as carrizumab leads to immune-mediated adverse effects including severe acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD) and secondary hemophagocytic syndrome (sHLH). Herein, we present two cases where aGVHD and sHLH developed after ICI administration, which was treated using methylprednisolone (MP). They developed high-grade fever complicated with liver dysfunction and diarrhea 1 day after ICI administration. Treatment with MP does not alleviate symptoms because of steroid resistance. Hyperbilirubinemia, rash with blisters, and watery diarrhea showed severe aGVHD. Hyperferritinemia, hypertriglyceridemia, and cytopenias suggested the diagnosis of HLH and met the criteria for sHLH diagnosis. They were thus administered intravenous high-dose MP, methotrexate (MTX), basiliximab, ruxolitinib, etc, which resolved these symptoms.