Implications of combined NOD2 and other gene mutations in autoinflammatory diseases

Genetic Approaches to Study Rheumatic Diseases and Its Implications in Clinical Practice

Patients with rare and complex rheumatic diseases (RDs) present with immense clinical variability inherent to all immunologic diseases. In addition to systemic and organ-specific inflammation, patients may display features of immunodeficiency or allergy, which may represent major diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. The person's genetic architecture has been a well-established risk factor for patients with RDs, albeit to variable degrees. Patients with early-onset diseases and/or positive family history (FH) have a strong genetic component, whereas patients with late-onset RDs demonstrate a more complex interplay of genetic and environmental risk factors. Overall, the genetic studies in patients with RDs have been instrumental to our understanding of innate and adaptive immunity in human health and disease. The elucidation of the molecular causes underlying rare diseases has played a major role in the identification of genes that are critical in the regulation of inflammatory responses. In addition, studies of patients with rare disorders may help determine the mechanisms of more complex autoimmune diseases by identifying variants with small effect sizes in the same genes. In contrast, studies of patients with common RDs are conducted in cohorts of patients with well-established phenotypes and ancestry-matched controls, and they aim to discover disease-related pathways that can inform the development of novel targeted therapies. Knowing the genetic cause of a disease has helped patients and families understand the disease progression and outcome. Here, we discuss the current understanding of genetic heritability and challenges in the diagnosis of RDs in patients and how this field may develop in the future.

TNFRSF11A variants contribute to systemic autoinflammatory diseases: A case series of 12 patients

BACKGROUND

Limited evidence suggests that variants in TNFRSF11A gene, encoding RANK, may contribute to systemic autoinflammatory disease (SAID).

AIM/METHODS

To estimate the prevalence of TNFRSF11A variants in a cohort of patients with SAIDs screened for 26 related genes and describe the disease phenotypic expression.

RESULTS

A total of 12 out of 167 patients, 7 males, aged (median) 38 years at disease onset, yielded at least one TNFRSF11A rare variant. All patients carried a coexisting variant in at least one other SAID-related gene, most frequently MEFV (6 patients), but also TNFRSF1A, NOD2, NLRP3, NLRP7, MVK, IL36RN, RBCK1, PLCG2 and PSMB8. SAID episodes lasting (median) 9 days manifested with high grade fever (91%), myalgias (75%), malaise (67%), serositis (58%), arthralgias/arthritis (58%), gastrointestinal involvement (33%), and rash (25%), and responded to corticosteroids. The most common initial clinical diagnosis was TNF-associated periodic fever syndrome (TRAPS), which was, however, confirmed, in only one patient. The emergence of MEFV variations supported the diagnosis of atypical Familial Mediterranean Fever in two cases, whereas the diagnosis of Yao syndrome was speculated in two patients with NOD2 variants. The presence of atypical disease and the inability of defining diagnosis in the remaining 7 patients, supported the possible involvement of TNFRSF11A variants in the phenotypic expression of SAIDs.

CONCLUSION

TNFRSF11A variants, occurring in 7% of SAID patients always in combination with other SAID-related gene variants, contribute to the development of an autoinflammatory syndrome resembling to TRAPS. Additional studies to confirm novel pathogenic SAID pathways are clearly warranted.

The expanding clinical spectrum of autoinflammatory diseases with NOD2 variants: a case series and literature review

Objective

To assess the impact conferred by NOD2 variants on the clinical spectrum of patients with systemic autoinflammatory diseases (SAIDs) in Greece.

Methods

Consecutive patients (n=167) with confirmed SAIDs who underwent screening by next generation sequencing (NGS) targeting 26 SAID-associated genes, and carried at least one NOD2 gene variant, were retrospectively studied. The demographic, clinical and laboratory parameters were recorded.

Results

In total, 24 rare NOD2 variants in 23/167 patients (14%) were detected. Notably, 18 patients had at least one co-existing variant in 13 genes other than NOD2. Nine patients had juvenile- and 14 adult-onset disease. All patients presented with symptoms potentially induced by the NOD2 variants. In particular, the candidate clinical diagnosis was Yao syndrome (YAOS) in 12 patients (7% of the whole SAID cohort). The clinical spectrum of patients with YAOS (mean episode duration 8 days) was fever (n=12/12), articular symptoms (n=8), gastrointestinal symptoms (n=7; abdominal pain/bloating in 7; diarrhea in 4; oral ulcers in 3), serositis (n=7), and rash (n=5), while the inflammatory markers were elevated in all but one patient. Most of these patients showed a poor response to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (n=7/9), colchicine (n=6/8) and/or anti-TNF treatment (n=3/4), while a complete response was observed in 6/10 patients receiving steroids and 3/5 on anti-IL1 treatment. Another 8 patients were diagnosed with either FMF (n=6) or PFAPA syndrome (n=2) presenting with prominent diarrhea (n=7), oral ulcers (n=2), periorbital swelling and sicca-like symptoms (n=1), or maculopapular rash (n=1). One patient had a clinically undefined SAID, albeit characterized by oral ulcers and diarrhea. Finally, one patient presented with chronic relapsing urticaria with periorbital edema and inflammatory markers, and another one had a Crohn-like syndrome with good response to anti-IL-1 but refractory to anti-TNF treatment.

Conclusion

NOD2 variants were detected in 1 out of 7 SAID patients and seem to have an impact on disease phenotype and treatment response. Further studies should validate combined molecular and clinical data to better understand these distinct nosological entities.

Genetic variations in NLRP3 and NLRP12 genes in adult-onset patients with autoinflammatory diseases: a comparative study

Objectives

Cryopyrin-associated periodic syndrome or NLRP3-associated autoinflammatory disease (NLRP3-AID) and NLRP12-AID are both Mendelian disorders with autosomal dominant inheritance. Both diseases are rare, primarily reported in the pediatric population, and are thought to be phenotypically indistinguishable. We provide the largest cohort of adult-onset patients and compared these diseases and the gene variant frequency to population controls.

Methods

A cohort of adult patients with AIDs were retrospectively studied. All underwent molecular testing for periodic fever syndrome gene panels after extensive and negative workups for systemic autoimmune and other related diseases. Patients were divided into Group 1- NLRP3-AID patients with NLRP3 variants (N=15), Group 2- NLRP12-AID with NLRP12 variants (N=14) and Group 3- both NLRP3 and NLRP12 (N=9) variants. Exome sequence data of two large control populations including the ARIC study were used to compare gene variant distribution and frequency.

Results

All 38 patients were Caucasian with women accounting for 82%. Median age at diagnosis was 41 ± 23 years and the disease duration at diagnosis was 14 ± 13 years. We identified statistically significant differences between the groups, notably that gastrointestinal symptoms as well as evaluations for same were significantly more frequent in patients with NLRP12 variants, and headaches/dizziness were less common among the NLRP12 patients. Livedo reticularis was noted in four patients, exclusively among NLRP12 carriers. Over 50% of patients in Groups 1 and 2 carry low-frequency disease-associated variants, while the remaining carry rare variants. We unprecedently identified digenic variants, i.e., the coexistence of NLRP3 and NLRP12, which were either both low frequency or low frequency/rare. Allele frequencies of all variants identified in our cohort were either absent or significantly lower in the control populations, further strengthening the evidence of susceptibility of these variants to SAID phenotypes.

Conclusion

Our comparative study shows that both NLRP3-AID and NLRP12-AID share similar clinical phenotypes, yet there are significant differences between them with regard to gastrointestinal and neurological symptoms. A spectrum of high to low genetic variations in both genes can contribute to SAID individually or in combination.