1
|
El-Meguid MA, Lotaif LM, Salum GM, Fotouh BE, Salama RM, Salem MISE, El Awady MK, Abdel Aziz AO, Dawood RM. Evaluation of the expression of fibrosis-related genes as non-invasive diagnostic biomarkers for cirrhotic HCV-infected patients. Cytokine 2024; 182:156714. [PMID: 39068734 DOI: 10.1016/j.cyto.2024.156714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2024] [Revised: 07/02/2024] [Accepted: 07/23/2024] [Indexed: 07/30/2024]
Abstract
Liver cirrhosis is a condition with high mortality that poses a significant health and economic burden worldwide. The clinical characteristics of liver cirrhosis are complex and varied. Therefore, the evaluation of immune infiltration-involved genes incirrhosis has become mandatory in liver disease research, not only to identify the potential biomarkers but also to provide important insights into the underlying mechanisms of the disease. In this study, we aimed to investigate the expression profile of cytokine genes in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of HCV patients and identify the gene expression signature associated with advanced cirrhosis. A cross-sectional study of 90 HCV genotype 4 patients, including no fibrosis patients (F0, n = 24), fibrotic patients (F1-F3, n = 36), and cirrhotic patients (F4, n = 30) has been conducted. The expression of cytokine genes was analyzed by quantitative real-time PCR in the subjects' PBMCs, and the serum level of TGFβ2 was measured by ELISA. Our findings showed that the expression level of the TGIF1 transcript was lower in cirrhotic and fibrotic patients compared to no fibrosis patients (p = 0.046 and 0.022, respectively). Also, there was an upregulation of the TGFβ1 gene in cirrhotic patients relative to fibrotic patients (p = 0.015). Additionally, the cirrhotic patients had higher expression levels of the TGF-β2 transcript and elevated levels of the TGF-β2 protein than patients with no cirrhosis or fibrosis. According to the ROC analysis, TGFβ1, TGIF1 transcripts, and TGFβ2 protein have a good discriminatory performance in distinguishing between cirrhotic, fibrotic, and non-fibrotic patients. Our results suggested that the expression of TGIF1, TGF-β1, and TGF-β2 genes in PBMCs may provide a valuable tool for identifying patients with advanced cirrhosis and that TGF-β and TGIF1 may be potential biomarkers for cirrhosis. These findings may have implications for the diagnosis and treatment of cirrhosis in HCV patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mai Abd El-Meguid
- Microbial Biotechnology Department, Biotechnology Research Institute, National Research Centre, P.O. 12622, Dokki, Giza, Egypt
| | - Lotaif Mostafa Lotaif
- Gastroenterology & Infectious Diseases Department, Ahmed Maher Teaching Hospital, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Ghada M Salum
- Microbial Biotechnology Department, Biotechnology Research Institute, National Research Centre, P.O. 12622, Dokki, Giza, Egypt
| | - Basma E Fotouh
- Microbial Biotechnology Department, Biotechnology Research Institute, National Research Centre, P.O. 12622, Dokki, Giza, Egypt
| | - Rabab Maamoun Salama
- Endemic Medicine and Hepatogastroenterology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | | | - Mostafa K El Awady
- Microbial Biotechnology Department, Biotechnology Research Institute, National Research Centre, P.O. 12622, Dokki, Giza, Egypt
| | - Ashraf Omar Abdel Aziz
- Endemic Medicine and Hepatogastroenterology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Reham M Dawood
- Microbial Biotechnology Department, Biotechnology Research Institute, National Research Centre, P.O. 12622, Dokki, Giza, Egypt.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
The Chemokine System in Oncogenic Pathways Driven by Viruses: Perspectives for Cancer Immunotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14030848. [PMID: 35159113 PMCID: PMC8834488 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14030848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2021] [Revised: 02/03/2022] [Accepted: 02/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Oncoviruses are viruses with oncogenic potential, responsible for almost 20% of human cancers worldwide. They are from various families, some of which belong to the microbial communities that inhabit several sites in the body of healthy humans. As a result, they most often establish latent infections controlled by the arsenal of human host responses that include the chemokine system playing key roles at the interface between tissue homeostasis and immune surveillance. Yet, chemokines and their receptors also contribute to oncogenic processes as they are targeted by the virus-induced deregulations of host responses and/or directly encoded by viruses. Thus, the chemokine system offers a strong rationale for therapeutic options, some few already approved or in trials, and future ones that we are discussing in view of the pharmacological approaches targeting the different functions of chemokines operating in both cancer cells and the tumor microenvironment. Abstract Chemokines interact with glycosaminoglycans of the extracellular matrix and activate heptahelical cellular receptors that mainly consist of G Protein-Coupled Receptors and a few atypical receptors also with decoy activity. They are well-described targets of oncogenic pathways and key players in cancer development, invasiveness, and metastasis acting both at the level of cancer cells and cells of the tumor microenvironment. Hence, they can regulate cancer cell proliferation and survival and promote immune or endothelial cell migration into the tumor microenvironment. Additionally, oncogenic viruses display the potential of jeopardizing the chemokine system by encoding mimics of chemokines and receptors as well as several products such as oncogenic proteins or microRNAs that deregulate their human host transcriptome. Conversely, the chemokine system participates in the host responses that control the virus life cycle, knowing that most oncoviruses establish asymptomatic latent infections. Therefore, the deregulated expression and function of chemokines and receptors as a consequence of acquired or inherited mutations could bias oncovirus infection toward pro-oncogenic pathways. We here review these different processes and discuss the anticancer therapeutic potential of targeting chemokine availability or receptor activation, from signaling to decoy-associated functions, in combination with immunotherapies.
Collapse
|