Decreased Vancomycin MICs among Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Clinical Isolates at a Chinese Tertiary Hospital over a 12-year Period

In Vitro Activity of Vancomycin, Teicoplanin, Linezolid and Daptomycin Against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates Collected from Chinese Hospitals in 2018-2020

Introduction

Vancomycin, teicoplanin, linezolid and daptomycin are four major antibacterials used for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection treatment. However, with the increasing failure of clinical MRSA anti-infective treatment, it is urgent to investigate the status of MRSA sensitivity to these four drugs.

Methods

In the present study, 407 non-duplicated MRSA isolates from 6 provinces in China were collected from January 2018 to August 2020. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of vancomycin, teicoplanin, linezolid and daptomycin were determined by broth microdilution method, and their MIC50, MIC90, and geometric mean MIC were calculated.

Results

All 407 MRSA strains were sensitive to these four antibacterials. MIC range of vancomycin, teicoplanin, linezolid and daptomycin was 0.25 to 2 mg/L, 0.125 to 4 mg/L, 0.25 to 4 mg/L and 0.06 to 1 mg/L, respectively. Between 2018 and 2020, there was no “MIC creep” in vancomycin, teicoplanin and daptomycin. The geometric mean MIC of linezolid was not increased, but both MIC50 and MIC90 in 2019 and 2020 MRSA isolates were higher than 2018 isolates.

Conclusion

All MRSA isolates remained sensitivity to vancomycin, teicoplanin, linezolid and daptomycin. The linezolid MIC50 and MIC90 increased have been found in this study.

Vancomycin, linezolid and daptomycin susceptibility pattern among clinical isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) from Sub- Himalyan Center

INTRODUCTION:

The efficacy of vancomycin, drug of choice for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), has become questionable due to the emergence of MRSA isolates with reduced susceptibility. The present study was conducted to determine the vancomycin, linezolid, and daptomycin susceptibility pattern in clinical isolates of MRSA and to observe minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) creep over 2 years if any.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

MIC of vancomycin, linezolid, and daptomycin were determined by E-test in 198 MRSA isolates and their MIC 50, MIC 90, and geometric mean MIC were calculated.

RESULTS:

While all isolates were sensitive to vancomycin, linezolid, and daptomycin, MIC 90 of vancomycin increased from 1.5 μg/ml in 2015 to 2 μg/ml in 2016. The percentage of isolates with vancomycin MIC >2 μg/ml doubled in 2016 (12.9%) as compared to 2015 (6.1%). MIC 90 for linezolid remained steady as 3 μg/ml, but geometric mean MIC increased from 2.20 μg/ml in 2015 to 2.29 μg/ml in 2016, and more than 40% isolates showed MIC 3 μg/ml. MIC 90 and geometric mean MIC of daptomycin decreased from 0.75 μg/ml to 0.5 μg/ml and 0.50 μg/ml to 0.36 μg/ml in 2015 and 2016, respectively.

CONCLUSION:

MIC creep was observed with vancomycin. Although linezolid MIC was within the susceptible zone, more than 40% strains showing MIC 3 μg/ml may herald the future development of either resistant or heteroresistant. Daptomycin showed good sensitivity against MRSA isolates. Therefore, it could be considered as an alternative agent for the treatment of infections caused by MRSA. However, it should be reserved where this class has a clear therapeutic advantage over other anti-MRSA drugs.

Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations of Vancomycin and Daptomycin Against Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Isolated from Various Clinical Specimens: A Study from South India

Background Staphylococci are Gram-positive cocci arranged in clusters. They are colonized in humans and animals. Also, Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is frequently associated with various superficial to deep-seated infections in humans. Due to the potential for easy transmission, Staphylococci are associated with both hospital-acquired and community-associated infections. Strains of S. aureus resistant to methicillin (MRSA) pose treatment challenges. In such cases, vancomycin is the treatment of choice. Due to the indiscriminate use of vancomycin, recently, we are seeing the emergence of vancomycin-intermediate sensitive S. aureus (VISA) and vancomycin-resistant S. aureus (VRSA). The present study aims to evaluate the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of vancomycin and daptomycin among MRSA strains isolated from human clinical specimens Methods The study included 115 MRSA isolates collected over 26 months from July 2010 to September 2012. The strains were isolated from pus, urine, wound swabs, catheters, blood, and sputum. The bacteria were acquired from different inpatient and outpatient departments of Prathima Institute of Medical Sciences, Karimnagar, Telangana, India. Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method using cefoxitin was used to confirm the MRSA isolates. The agar dilution and the Epsilometer method (E-test) were used to test the MICs of MRSA isolates against vancomycin and daptomycin, respectively, by the standard procedures recommended by the clinical laboratory standards institute (CLSI). Results Of the 115 S. aureus isolates, seven (6.08%) strains were resistant to vancomycin (VRSA) and 53 (46.08%) were found to be VISA using the new CLSI breakpoints. The MIC of the daptomycin was found to be ≤1 µg/ml for all the MRSA isolates. Conclusion The study results depicted an increasing trend in the vancomycin MICs among the MRSA isolates. Several tested strains show MICs in the intermediate sensitive range (VISA). The daptomycin was effective against all the MRSA isolates.

A 5-year Survey Reveals Increased Susceptibility to Glycopeptides for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia Patients in a Chinese Burn Center

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections are prevalent in burn wards, and are especially serious in S. aureus bacteremia (SAB) patients. Glycopeptides and daptomycin are effective against MRSA infections, but MIC creeps can reduce their efficacy. Our object was to perform a molecular epidemiological investigation of S. aureus isolates in our burn center and to evaluate MICs for antimicrobials against SAB-associated MRSA isolates. A total of 259 S. aureus isolates, obtained from August 2011 to July 2016, were used in this study. Multiple molecular typing was used for molecular epidemiological analysis. E-tests were used to determine MICs of vancomycin, teicoplanin, and daptomycin for SAB-associated MRSA isolates. MIC values were stratified by collection date or source and compared. Spearman's test was used to analyze MICs correlations amongst tested antimicrobials. ST239-MRSA-III-t030-agrI clone was found to be dominant in both SAB and non-SAB patients, and significantly more in SAB patients (P < 0.0001). SAB-MRSA isolates exhibited decreased MICs for vancomycin, teicoplanin, and daptomycin during the 5-year period. Compared to those isolated from catheters or wounds, SAB-MRSA isolates from the bloodstream were less susceptible to vancomycin and daptomycin, but more susceptible to teicoplanin. MICs Correlation was found only between vancomycin and daptomycin in MRSA isolates from the bloodstream (rho = 0.250, P = 0.024). In conclusion, our results suggest that MRSA infections are still serious problems in burn centers. In contrast to most other studies, we observed increased susceptibility to glycopeptides and daptomycin against SAB-associated MRSA in our center from 2011 to 2016, suggesting the use of glycopeptides does not lead to MIC creeps. Isolates from different sites of the body may exhibit different levels of susceptibility and change trend over time for different antimicrobials, antimicrobials selection for MRSA infections should be considered comprehensively.