Real-world applicability of glial fibrillary acidic protein and neurofilament light chain in Alzheimer's disease

Blood-Based Biomarkers in Alzheimer's Disease: Advancing Non-Invasive Diagnostics and Prognostics

Alzheimer's disease (AD), the most prevalent form of dementia, is expected to rise dramatically in incidence due to the global population aging. Traditional diagnostic approaches, such as cerebrospinal fluid analysis and positron emission tomography, are expensive and invasive, limiting their routine clinical use. Recent advances in blood-based biomarkers, including amyloid-beta, phosphorylated tau, and neurofilament light, offer promising non-invasive alternatives for early AD detection and disease monitoring. This review synthesizes current research on these blood-based biomarkers, highlighting their potential to track AD pathology and enhance diagnostic accuracy. Furthermore, this review uniquely integrates recent findings on protein-protein interaction networks and microRNA pathways, exploring novel combinations of proteomic, genomic, and epigenomic biomarkers that provide new insights into AD's molecular mechanisms. Additionally, we discuss the integration of these biomarkers with advanced neuroimaging techniques, emphasizing their potential to revolutionize AD diagnostics. Although large-scale validation is still needed, these biomarkers represent a critical advancement toward more accessible, cost-effective, and early diagnostic tools for AD.

A genetic and proteomic comparison of key AD biomarkers across tissues

INTRODUCTION

Plasma has been proposed as an alternative to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) for measuring Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarkers, but no studies have analyzed in detail which biofluid is more informative for genetics studies of AD.

METHOD

Eleven proteins associated with AD (α-synuclein, apolipoprotein E [apoE], CLU, GFAP, GRN, NfL, NRGN, SNAP-25, TREM2, VILIP-1, YKL-40) were assessed in plasma (n = 2317) and CSF (n = 3107). Both plasma and CSF genome-wide association study (GWAS) analyses were performed for each protein, followed by functional annotation. Additional characterization for each biomarker included calculation of correlations and predictive power.

RESULTS

Eighteen plasma protein quantitative train loci (pQTLs) associated with 10 proteins and 16 CSF pQTLs associated with 9 proteins were identified. Plasma and CSF shared some genetic loci, but protein levels between tissues correlated weakly. CSF protein levels better associated with AD compared to plasma.

DISCUSSION

The present results indicate that CSF is more informative than plasma for genetic studies in AD.

HIGHLIGHTS

The identification of novel protein quantitative trait loci (pQTLs) in both plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Plasma and CSF levels of neurodegeneration-related proteins correlated weakly. CSF is more informative than plasma for genetic studies of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Neurofilament light (NfL), triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (TREM2), and chitinase-3-like protein 1 (YKL-40) tend to show relatively strong inter-tissue associations. A novel signal in the apolipoprotein E (APOE) region was identified, which is an eQTL for APOC1.

Blood Astrocyte Biomarkers in Alzheimer Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Neuroinflammation, particularly early astrocyte reactivity, is a significant driver of Alzheimer disease (AD) pathogenesis. It is unclear how the levels of astrocyte biomarkers change in patients across the AD continuum and which best reflect AD-related change. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of 3 blood astrocyte biomarkers (glial fibrillary acidic protein [GFAP], chitinase-3-like protein 1 [YKL-40], and S100B) in patients clinically diagnosed with AD.

METHODS

MEDLINE and Web of Science were searched on March 23, 2023, without restrictions on language, time, or study design, for studies reporting blood levels of the astrocyte biomarkers GFAP, YKL-40, or S100B in patients on the AD continuum (including those with mild cognitive impairment [MCI] and dementia) and a cognitively unimpaired (CU) control population. AD diagnosis was based on established diagnostic criteria and/or comprehensive multidisciplinary clinical consensus. Studies reporting indirect biomarker measures (e.g., levels of biomarker autoantibodies) were excluded. Risk of bias assessment was performed using the revised Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool. Pooled effect sizes were determined using the Hedge g method with a random-effects model. The review was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (registration number CRD42023458305).

RESULTS

The search identified 1,186 studies; 36 met inclusion criteria (AD continuum n = 3,366, CU n = 4,115). No study was assessed to have a high risk of bias. Compared with CU individuals, patients on the AD continuum had higher GFAP and YKL-40 levels (GFAP effect size 1.15, 95% CI 0.94-1.36, p < 0.0001; YKL-40 effect size 0.38, 95% CI 0.28-0.49, p < 0.0001). Both biomarkers were elevated in more advanced clinical stages of the disease (i.e., in AD dementia compared with MCI due to AD: GFAP effect size 0.48, 95% CI 0.19-0.76, p = 0.0009; YKL-40 effect size 0.34, 95% CI 0.10-0.57, p = 0.0048). No significant differences in blood S100B levels were identified.

DISCUSSION

We demonstrated significant elevations in blood GFAP and YKL-40 levels in patients on the AD continuum compared with CU individuals. Furthermore, within the AD clinical spectrum, significant elevation correlated with more advanced disease stage. Our findings suggest that both biomarkers reflect AD-related pathology. Our findings are limited by the lack of cultural and linguistic diversity in the study populations meta-analyzed. Future meta-analyses using a biomarker-defined AD population are warranted.

Tau, Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, and Neurofilament Light Chain as Brain Protein Biomarkers in Cerebrospinal Fluid and Blood for Diagnosis of Neurobiological Diseases

Neurological damage is the pathological substrate of permanent disability in various neurodegenerative disorders. Early detection of this damage, including its identification and quantification, is critical to preventing the disease's progression in the brain. Tau, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and neurofilament light chain (NfL), as brain protein biomarkers, have the potential to improve diagnostic accuracy, disease monitoring, prognostic assessment, and treatment efficacy. These biomarkers are released into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood proportionally to the degree of neuron and astrocyte damage in different neurological disorders, including stroke, traumatic brain injury, multiple sclerosis, neurodegenerative dementia, and Parkinson's disease. Here, we review how Tau, GFAP, and NfL biomarkers are detected in CSF and blood as crucial diagnostic tools, as well as the levels of these biomarkers used for differentiating a range of neurological diseases and monitoring disease progression. We also discuss a biosensor approach that allows for the real-time detection of multiple biomarkers in various neurodegenerative diseases. This combined detection system of brain protein biomarkers holds significant promise for developing more specific and accurate clinical tools that can identify the type and stage of human neurological diseases with greater precision.

SIMOA Diagnostics on Alzheimer's Disease and Frontotemporal Dementia

BACKGROUND

Accurate diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) represents a health issue due to the absence of disease traits. We assessed the performance of a SIMOA panel in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from 43 AD and 33 FTD patients with 60 matching Control subjects in combination with demographic-clinical characteristics.

METHODS

136 subjects (AD: n = 43, FTD: n = 33, Controls: n = 60) participated. Single-molecule array (SIMOA), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), neurofilament light (NfL), TAU, and ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) in CSF were analyzed with a multiplex neuro 4plex kit. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis compared area under the curve (AUC), while the principal of the sparse partial least squares discriminant analysis (sPLS-DA) was used with the intent to strengthen the identification of confident disease clusters.

RESULTS

CSF exhibited increased levels of all SIMOA biomarkers in AD compared to Controls (AUCs: 0.71, 0.86, 0.92, and 0.94, respectively). Similar patterns were observed in FTD with NfL, TAU, and UCH-L1 (AUCs: 0.85, 0.72, and 0.91). sPLS-DA revealed two components explaining 19% and 9% of dataset variation.

CONCLUSIONS

CSF data provide high diagnostic accuracy among AD, FTD, and Control discrimination. Subgroups of demographic-clinical characteristics and biomarker concentration highlighted the potential of combining different kinds of data for successful and more efficient cohort clustering.

Which neuroimaging and fluid biomarkers method is better in theranostic of Alzheimer's disease? An umbrella review

Biomarkers are measured to evaluate physiological and pathological processes as well as responses to a therapeutic intervention. Biomarkers can be classified as diagnostic, prognostic, predictor, clinical, and therapeutic. In Alzheimer's disease (AD), multiple biomarkers have been reported so far. Nevertheless, finding a specific biomarker in AD remains a major challenge. Three databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus were selected with the keywords of Alzheimer's disease, neuroimaging, biomarker, and blood. The results were finalized with 49 potential CSF/blood and 35 neuroimaging biomarkers. To distinguish normal from AD patients, amyloid-beta42 (Aβ42), plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and neurofilament light (NFL) as potential biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) as well as the serum could be detected. Nevertheless, most of the biomarkers fairly change in the CSF during AD, listed as kallikrein 6, virus-like particles (VLP-1), galectin-3 (Gal-3), and synaptotagmin-1 (Syt-1). From the neuroimaging aspect, atrophy is an accepted biomarker for the neuropathologic progression of AD. In addition, Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), tractography (DTT), positron emission tomography (PET), and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), can be used to detect AD. Using neuroimaging and CSF/blood biomarkers, in combination with artificial intelligence, it is possible to obtain information on prognosis and follow-up on the different stages of AD. Hence physicians could select the suitable therapy to attenuate disease symptoms and follow up on the efficiency of the prescribed drug.

Neuropathology, Neuroimaging, and Fluid Biomarkers in Alzheimer's Disease

An improved understanding of the pathobiology of Alzheimer's disease (AD) should lead ultimately to an earlier and more accurate diagnosis of AD, providing the opportunity to intervene earlier in the disease process and to improve outcomes. The known hallmarks of Alzheimer's disease include amyloid-β plaques and neurofibrillary tau tangles. It is now clear that an imbalance between production and clearance of the amyloid beta protein and related Aβ peptides, especially Aβ42, is a very early, initiating factor in Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathogenesis, leading to aggregates of hyperphosphorylation and misfolded tau protein, inflammation, and neurodegeneration. In this article, we review how the AD diagnostic process has been transformed in recent decades by our ability to measure these various elements of the pathological cascade through the use of imaging and fluid biomarkers. The more recently developed plasma biomarkers, especially phosphorylated-tau217 (p-tau217), have utility for screening and diagnosis of the earliest stages of AD. These biomarkers can also be used to measure target engagement by disease-modifying therapies and the response to treatment.

Relationship between increased serum neurofilament light chain and glial fibrillary acidic protein levels with non-motor symptoms in patients with Parkinson's disease

BACKGROUND

This study set out to investigate the relationship between serum neurofilament light chain (NFL), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and various non-motor symptoms (NMSs) in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD).

METHODS

The study included 37 healthy controls (HCs) and 51 PD patients. Clinical assessments of PD symptoms were conducted for all PD patients. The NMSS was utilised to evaluate the NMS burden (NMSB) in individuals. Based on the severity of NMSB, we further categorised the PD group into two subgroups: mild-moderate NMSB group and severe-very severe NMSB group. The amounts of NFL and GFAP in the serum were measured using an extremely sensitive single molecule array (Simoa) method. Statistical analyses were performed on the collected data using SPSS 26.0 and R (version 3.6.3).

RESULTS

Serum GFAP and NFL levels in the PD group with severe-very severe NMSB were significantly higher than those in the mild-moderate NMSB group (GFAP: P < 0.007; NFL: P < 0.009). Serum NFL and GFAP levels had positive correlations with NMSS total scores (GFAP: r = 0.326, P = 0.020; NFL: r = 0.318, P = 0.023) and multiple subdomains. The relationship between the attention/memory domains of NMSS and NFL levels is significantly positive (r = 0.283, P = 0.044). Similarly, the mood/apathy domains of NMSS are also significantly positively correlated with GFAP levels (r = 0.441, P = 0.001). Patients with emotional problems or cognitive impairment had higher GFAP or NFL levels, respectively. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that NMSs play a mediating role in the quality of life of patients with PD. Moreover, the combination of NFL and GFAP has proven to be more effective than using a single component in identifying PD patients with severe-very severe NMSB.

CONCLUSIONS

The severity of NMSs in PD patients, particularly cognitive and emotional symptoms, was found to be associated with the levels of serum NFL and GFAP. This study marks the first attempt to examine the connection between NMSs of PD and the simultaneous identification of NFL and GFAP levels.

Utility of serum neurofilament light chain and glial fibrillary acidic protein as diagnostic biomarkers of freezing of gait in Parkinson's disease

Freezing of gait (FOG) is one of the most distressing features of Parkinson's disease (PD), increasing the risks of fractures and seriously affecting patients' quality of life. We aimed to examine the potential diagnostic roles of serum neurofilament light chain (NFL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in PD patients with FOG (PD-FOG). We included 99 patients, comprising 54 PD patients without FOG (PD-NoFOG), 45 PD-FOG and 37 healthy controls (HCs). Our results indicated serum markers were significantly higher in PD-FOG and postural instability and gait difficulty (PIGD) motor subtype patients than in PD-NoFOG and non-PIGD subtype patients (P < 0.05), respectively. Patients with high concentrations of the markers NFL and GFAP had higher PIGD scores and greater FOG severity than those with low concentrations. Moreover, serum levels of both NFL and GFAP were significantly positively associated with age, FOG severity, PD-FOG status, and negatively associated with Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores. Logistic regression analysis identified serum levels of NFL and GFAP as independent risk factors for PD-FOG. Mediation analysis revealed that MMSE scores fully mediated the relationship between serum GFAP levels and FOG-Q scores, accounting for 33.33% of the total effects (indirect effect = 0.01, 95% CI 0.01-0.02). NFL levels differentiated PD-FOG from PD-NoFOG with reliable diagnostic accuracy (AUC 0.75, 95% CI 0.66-0.84), and the combination of NFL, GFAP, duration and MMSE scores demonstrated high accuracy (AUC 0.84, 95% CI 0.76-0.91). Our findings support the notion that NFL and GFAP may be potential biomarkers for the diagnosis of PD-FOG.

Cross-sectional and longitudinal evaluation of plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein to detect and predict clinical syndromes of Alzheimer's disease

Introduction

This study examined plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) as a biomarker of cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease (AD) with and against plasma neurofilament light chain (NfL), and phosphorylated tau (p-tau)181+231.

Methods

Plasma samples were analyzed using Simoa platform for 567 participants spanning the AD continuum. Cognitive diagnosis, neuropsychological testing, and dementia severity were examined for cross-sectional and longitudinal outcomes.

Results

Plasma GFAP discriminated AD dementia from normal cognition (adjusted mean difference = 0.90 standard deviation [SD]) and mild cognitive impairment (adjusted mean difference = 0.72 SD), and demonstrated superior discrimination compared to alternative plasma biomarkers. Higher GFAP was associated with worse dementia severity and worse performance on 11 of 12 neuropsychological tests. Longitudinally, GFAP predicted decline in memory, but did not predict conversion to mild cognitive impairment or dementia.

Discussion

Plasma GFAP was associated with clinical outcomes related to suspected AD and could be of assistance in a plasma biomarker panel to detect in vivo AD.

SIMOA-based analysis of plasma NFL levels in MCI and AD patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The single-molecule array assay (SIMOA)-based detection of neurofilament light (NFL) chain could be useful in diagnosing mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD). This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the circulating concentration of NFL in AD and MCI patients compared with healthy controls using the SIMOA technique.

METHODS

To this end, Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the reference lists of relevant articles were systematically searched for studies reporting serum NFL chain levels in healthy controls, MCI, and AD patients. Appropriate statistical methods were employed to achieve the study purpose.

RESULTS

Fifteen eligible studies including 3086 patients were pooled out of a total of 347 publications. Fixed effect model analysis showed that NFL chain level was significantly higher in the serum of patients with MCI (0.361 SMD, 95% CI, 0.286-0.435, p = 0.000, I2 = 49.179) and AD (0.808 SMD, 95% CI, 0.727-0.888, p = 0.000, I2 = 39.433) compared with healthy individuals. The analysis also showed that the NFL chain levels in plasma were significantly different between patients with MCI and AD (0.436 SMD, 95% CI, 0.359-0.513, p = 0.000, I2 = 37.44). The overall heterogeneity of the studies was modest.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the potential of serum NFL chain detected using SIMOA in differentiating MCI, AD, and healthy controls.

GFAP as a Potential Biomarker for Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Blood biomarkers have been considered tools for the diagnosis, prognosis, and monitoring of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Although amyloid-β peptide (Aβ) and tau are primarily blood biomarkers, recent studies have identified other reliable candidates that can serve as measurable indicators of pathological conditions. One such candidate is the glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), an astrocytic cytoskeletal protein that can be detected in blood samples. Increasing evidence suggests that blood GFAP levels can be used to detect early-stage AD. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate GFAP in peripheral blood as a biomarker for AD and provide an overview of the evidence regarding its utility. Our analysis revealed that the GFAP level in the blood was higher in the Aβ-positive group than in the negative groups, and in individuals with AD or mild cognitive impairment (MCI) compared to the healthy controls. Therefore, we believe that the clinical use of blood GFAP measurements has the potential to accelerate the diagnosis and improve the prognosis of AD.

Plasma Biomarkers of Alzheimer's Disease: A Review of Available Assays, Recent Developments, and Implications for Clinical Practice

Recently, low-sensitive plasma assays have been replaced by new ultra-sensitive assays such as single molecule enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Simoa), the Mesoscale Discovery (MSD) platform, and immunoprecipitation-mass spectrometry (IP-MS) with higher accuracy in the determination of plasma biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Despite the significant variability, many studies have established in-house cut-off values for the most promising available biomarkers. We first reviewed the most used laboratory methods and assays to measure plasma AD biomarkers. Next, we review studies focused on the diagnostic performance of these biomarkers to identify AD cases, predict cognitive decline in pre-clinical AD cases, and differentiate AD cases from other dementia. We summarized data from studies published until January 2023. A combination of plasma Aβ_42/40 ratio, age, and APOE status showed the best accuracy in diagnosing brain amyloidosis with a liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) assay. Plasma p-tau217 has shown the best accuracy in distinguishing Aβ-PET+ from Aβ-PET-even in cognitively unimpaired individuals. We also summarized the different cut-off values for each biomarker when available. Recently developed assays for plasma biomarkers have undeniable importance in AD research, with improved analytical and diagnostic performance. Some biomarkers have been extensively used in clinical trials and are now clinically available. Nonetheless, several challenges remain to their widespread use in clinical practice.