Outcome devaluation by specific satiety disrupts sensory-specific Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer

Sex-biased effects of outcome devaluation by sensory-specific satiety on Pavlovian-conditioned behavior

Goal-directed behavior relies on accurate mental representations of the value of expected outcomes. Disruptions to this process are a central feature of several neuropsychiatric disorders, including addiction. Goal-directed behavior is most frequently studied using instrumental paradigms paired with outcome devaluation, but cue-evoked behaviors in Pavlovian settings can also be goal-directed and therefore sensitive to changes in outcome value. Emerging literature suggests that male and female rats may differ in the degree to which their Pavlovian-conditioned responses are goal-directed, but interpretation of these findings is complicated by the tendency of female and male rats to engage in distinct types of Pavlovian responses when trained with localizable cues. Here, we used outcome devaluation via sensory-specific satiety to assess the behavioral responses in male and female Long Evans rats trained to respond to an auditory CS (conditioned stimulus) in a Pavlovian-conditioning paradigm. We found that satiety-induced devaluation led to a decrease in behavioral responding to the reward-predictive CS, with males showing an effect on both port entry latency and probability and females showing an effect only on port entry probability. Overall, our results suggest that outcome devaluation affects Pavlovian-conditioned responses in both male and female rats, but that females may be less sensitive to outcome devaluation.

Outcome devaluation by sensory-specific satiety alters Pavlovian-conditioned behavior in male and female rats

Goal-directed behavior relies on accurate mental representations of the value of expected outcomes. Disruptions to this process are a central feature of several neuropsychiatric disorders, including addiction. Goal-directed behavior is most frequently studied using instrumental paradigms paired with outcome devaluation, but cue-evoked behaviors in Pavlovian settings can also be goal-directed and therefore sensitive to changes in outcome value. Emerging literature suggests that male and female rats may differ in the degree to which their Pavlovian-conditioned responses are goal-directed, but interpretation of these findings is complicated by the tendency of female and male rats to engage in distinct types of Pavlovian responses when trained with localizable cues. Here, we used outcome devaluation via sensory-specific satiety to assess the behavioral responses in male and female Long Evans rats trained to respond to an auditory CS (conditioned stimulus) in a Pavlovian-conditioning paradigm. We found that satiety-induced devaluation led to a decrease in behavioral responding to the reward-predictive CS, with males showing an effect on both port entry latency and probability and females showing an effect only on port entry probability. Overall, our results suggest that outcome devaluation affects Pavlovian-conditioned responses in both male and female rats, but that females may be less sensitive to outcome devaluation.

Diet and obesity effects on cue-driven food-seeking: insights from studies of Pavlovian-instrumental transfer in rodents and humans

Our modern environment is said to be obesogenic, promoting the consumption of calorically dense foods and reducing energy expenditure. One factor thought to drive excess energy intake is the abundance of cues signaling the availability of highly palatable foods. Indeed, these cues exert powerful influences over food-related decision-making. Although obesity is associated with changes to several cognitive domains, the specific role of cues in producing this shift and on decision-making more generally, remains poorly understood. Here we review the literature examining how obesity and palatable diets affect the ability of Pavlovian cues to influence instrumental food-seeking behaviors by examining rodent and human studies incorporating Pavlovian-instrumental transfer (PIT) protocols. There are two types of PIT: (a) general PIT that tests whether cues can energize actions elicited in the pursuit of food generally, and (b) specific PIT which tests whether cues can elicit an action that earns a specific food outcome when faced with a choice. Both types of PIT have been shown to be vulnerable to alterations as a result of changes to diet and obesity. However, effects appear to be driven less by increases in body fat and more by palatable diet exposure per se. We discuss the limitations and implications of the current findings. The challenges for future research are to uncover the mechanisms underlying these alterations to PIT, which appear unrelated to excess weight itself, and to better model the complex determinants of food choice in humans.

Flexible control of Pavlovian-instrumental transfer based on expected reward value

The Pavlovian-instrumental transfer (PIT) paradigm is widely used to assay the motivational influence of reward-predictive cues, reflected by their ability to invigorate instrumental behavior. Leading theories assume that a cue's motivational properties are tied to predicted reward value. We outline an alternative view that recognizes that reward-predictive cues may suppress rather than motivate instrumental behavior under certain conditions, an effect termed positive conditioned suppression. We posit that cues signaling imminent reward delivery tend to inhibit instrumental behavior, which is exploratory by nature, in order to facilitate efficient retrieval of the expected reward. According to this view, the motivation to engage in instrumental behavior during a cue should be inversely related to the value of the predicted reward, since there is more to lose by failing to secure a high-value reward than a low-value reward. We tested this hypothesis in rats using a PIT protocol known to induce positive conditioned suppression. In Experiment 1, cues signaling different reward magnitudes elicited distinct response patterns. Whereas the one-pellet cue increased instrumental behavior, cues signaling three or nine pellets suppressed instrumental behavior and elicited high levels of food-port activity. Experiment 2 found that reward-predictive cues suppressed instrumental behavior and increased food-port activity in a flexible manner that was disrupted by post-training reward devaluation. Further analyses suggest that these findings were not driven by overt competition between the instrumental and food-port responses. We discuss how the PIT task may provide a useful tool for studying cognitive control over cue-motivated behavior in rodents. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).