1
|
Eckstein N, Bates AS, Champion A, Du M, Yin Y, Schlegel P, Lu AKY, Rymer T, Finley-May S, Paterson T, Parekh R, Dorkenwald S, Matsliah A, Yu SC, McKellar C, Sterling A, Eichler K, Costa M, Seung S, Murthy M, Hartenstein V, Jefferis GSXE, Funke J. Neurotransmitter classification from electron microscopy images at synaptic sites in Drosophila melanogaster. Cell 2024; 187:2574-2594.e23. [PMID: 38729112 PMCID: PMC11106717 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2024.03.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2023] [Revised: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024]
Abstract
High-resolution electron microscopy of nervous systems has enabled the reconstruction of synaptic connectomes. However, we do not know the synaptic sign for each connection (i.e., whether a connection is excitatory or inhibitory), which is implied by the released transmitter. We demonstrate that artificial neural networks can predict transmitter types for presynapses from electron micrographs: a network trained to predict six transmitters (acetylcholine, glutamate, GABA, serotonin, dopamine, octopamine) achieves an accuracy of 87% for individual synapses, 94% for neurons, and 91% for known cell types across a D. melanogaster whole brain. We visualize the ultrastructural features used for prediction, discovering subtle but significant differences between transmitter phenotypes. We also analyze transmitter distributions across the brain and find that neurons that develop together largely express only one fast-acting transmitter (acetylcholine, glutamate, or GABA). We hope that our publicly available predictions act as an accelerant for neuroscientific hypothesis generation for the fly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nils Eckstein
- HHMI Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, VA, USA; Institute of Neuroinformatics UZH/ETHZ, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Alexander Shakeel Bates
- Neurobiology Division, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK; Centre for Neural Circuits and Behaviour, The University of Oxford, Tinsley Building, Mansfield Road, Oxford OX1 3SR, UK; Department of Neurobiology and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrew Champion
- Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Michelle Du
- HHMI Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, VA, USA
| | - Yijie Yin
- Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Philipp Schlegel
- Neurobiology Division, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK; Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Sven Dorkenwald
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Arie Matsliah
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Szi-Chieh Yu
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Claire McKellar
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Amy Sterling
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Katharina Eichler
- Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Marta Costa
- Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sebastian Seung
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Mala Murthy
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Volker Hartenstein
- Department of Molecular Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Gregory S X E Jefferis
- Neurobiology Division, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK; Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
| | - Jan Funke
- HHMI Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, VA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wilson A, Babadi M. SynapseCLR: Uncovering features of synapses in primary visual cortex through contrastive representation learning. PATTERNS 2023; 4:100693. [PMID: 37123442 PMCID: PMC10140600 DOI: 10.1016/j.patter.2023.100693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Revised: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 01/25/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2023]
Abstract
3D electron microscopy (EM) connectomics image volumes are surpassing 1 mm3, providing information-dense, multi-scale visualizations of brain circuitry and necessitating scalable analysis techniques. We present SynapseCLR, a self-supervised contrastive learning method for 3D EM data, and use it to extract features of synapses from mouse visual cortex. SynapseCLR feature representations separate synapses by appearance and functionally important structural annotations. We demonstrate SynapseCLR's utility for valuable downstream tasks, including one-shot identification of defective synapse segmentations, dataset-wide similarity-based querying, and accurate imputation of annotations for unlabeled synapses, using manual annotation of only 0.2% of the dataset's synapses. In particular, excitatory versus inhibitory neuronal types can be assigned with >99.8% accuracy to individual synapses and highly truncated neurites, enabling neurite-enhanced connectomics analysis. Finally, we present a data-driven, unsupervised study of synaptic structural variation on the representation manifold, revealing its intrinsic axes of variation and showing that representations contain inhibitory subtype information.
Collapse
|
3
|
Scheffer LK. Finding the right type of cell. eLife 2023; 12:86172. [PMID: 36795093 PMCID: PMC9934855 DOI: 10.7554/elife.86172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/17/2023] Open
Abstract
A new method allows researchers to automatically assign cells into different cell types and tissues, a step which is critical for understanding complex organisms.
Collapse
|
4
|
Sheridan A, Nguyen TM, Deb D, Lee WCA, Saalfeld S, Turaga SC, Manor U, Funke J. Local shape descriptors for neuron segmentation. Nat Methods 2023; 20:295-303. [PMID: 36585455 PMCID: PMC9911350 DOI: 10.1038/s41592-022-01711-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2021] [Accepted: 11/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
We present an auxiliary learning task for the problem of neuron segmentation in electron microscopy volumes. The auxiliary task consists of the prediction of local shape descriptors (LSDs), which we combine with conventional voxel-wise direct neighbor affinities for neuron boundary detection. The shape descriptors capture local statistics about the neuron to be segmented, such as diameter, elongation, and direction. On a study comparing several existing methods across various specimen, imaging techniques, and resolutions, auxiliary learning of LSDs consistently increases segmentation accuracy of affinity-based methods over a range of metrics. Furthermore, the addition of LSDs promotes affinity-based segmentation methods to be on par with the current state of the art for neuron segmentation (flood-filling networks), while being two orders of magnitudes more efficient-a critical requirement for the processing of future petabyte-sized datasets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arlo Sheridan
- grid.443970.dHHMI Janelia, Ashburn, VA USA ,grid.250671.70000 0001 0662 7144Waitt Advanced Biophotonics Center, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA USA
| | - Tri M. Nguyen
- grid.38142.3c000000041936754XDepartment of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | | | - Wei-Chung Allen Lee
- grid.38142.3c000000041936754XF.M. Kirby Neurobiology Center, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | | | | | - Uri Manor
- grid.250671.70000 0001 0662 7144Waitt Advanced Biophotonics Center, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lu Z, Xu CS, Hayworth KJ, Pang S, Shinomiya K, Plaza SM, Scheffer LK, Rubin GM, Hess HF, Rivlin PK, Meinertzhagen IA. En bloc preparation of Drosophila brains enables high-throughput FIB-SEM connectomics. Front Neural Circuits 2022; 16:917251. [PMID: 36589862 PMCID: PMC9801301 DOI: 10.3389/fncir.2022.917251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Deriving the detailed synaptic connections of an entire nervous system is the unrealized goal of the nascent field of connectomics. For the fruit fly Drosophila, in particular, we need to dissect the brain, connectives, and ventral nerve cord as a single continuous unit, fix and stain it, and undertake automated segmentation of neuron membranes. To achieve this, we designed a protocol using progressive lowering of temperature dehydration (PLT), a technique routinely used to preserve cellular structure and antigenicity. We combined PLT with low temperature en bloc staining (LTS) and recover fixed neurons as round profiles with darkly stained synapses, suitable for machine segmentation and automatic synapse detection. Here we report three different PLT-LTS methods designed to meet the requirements for FIB-SEM imaging of the Drosophila brain. These requirements include: good preservation of ultrastructural detail, high level of en bloc staining, artifact-free microdissection, and smooth hot-knife cutting to reduce the brain to dimensions suited to FIB-SEM. In addition to PLT-LTS, we designed a jig to microdissect and pre-fix the fly's delicate brain and central nervous system. Collectively these methods optimize morphological preservation, allow us to image the brain usually at 8 nm per voxel, and simultaneously speed the formerly slow rate of FIB-SEM imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhiyuan Lu
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Life Sciences Centre, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada,Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA, United States
| | - C. Shan Xu
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA, United States,Department of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Kenneth J. Hayworth
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA, United States
| | - Song Pang
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA, United States,Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Kazunori Shinomiya
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA, United States
| | - Stephen M. Plaza
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA, United States
| | - Louis K. Scheffer
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA, United States
| | - Gerald M. Rubin
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA, United States
| | - Harald F. Hess
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA, United States
| | - Patricia K. Rivlin
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA, United States,Applied Physics Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University, Laurel, MD, United States,*Correspondence: Patricia K. Rivlin,
| | - Ian A. Meinertzhagen
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Life Sciences Centre, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada,Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA, United States,*Correspondence: Patricia K. Rivlin,
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zhang A, Shailja S, Borba C, Miao Y, Goebel M, Ruschel R, Ryan K, Smith W, Manjunath BS. Automatic classification and neurotransmitter prediction of synapses in electron microscopy. BIOLOGICAL IMAGING 2022; 2:e6. [PMID: 38486830 PMCID: PMC10936391 DOI: 10.1017/s2633903x2200006x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2022] [Revised: 06/24/2022] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 03/17/2024]
Abstract
This paper presents a deep-learning-based workflow to detect synapses and predict their neurotransmitter type in the primitive chordate Ciona intestinalis (Ciona) electron microscopic (EM) images. Identifying synapses from EM images to build a full map of connections between neurons is a labor-intensive process and requires significant domain expertise. Automation of synapse classification would hasten the generation and analysis of connectomes. Furthermore, inferences concerning neuron type and function from synapse features are in many cases difficult to make. Finding the connection between synapse structure and function is an important step in fully understanding a connectome. Class Activation Maps derived from the convolutional neural network provide insights on important features of synapses based on cell type and function. The main contribution of this work is in the differentiation of synapses by neurotransmitter type through the structural information in their EM images. This enables the prediction of neurotransmitter types for neurons in Ciona, which were previously unknown. The prediction model with code is available on GitHub.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Zhang
- Vision Research Laboratory, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, USA
| | - S. Shailja
- Vision Research Laboratory, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, USA
| | - Cezar Borba
- Neuroscience Research Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, USA
- Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, USA
| | - Yishen Miao
- Neuroscience Research Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, USA
- Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, USA
| | - Michael Goebel
- Vision Research Laboratory, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, USA
| | - Raphael Ruschel
- Vision Research Laboratory, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, USA
| | - Kerrianne Ryan
- Meinertzhagen Laboratory of Invertebrate Neurobiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - William Smith
- Neuroscience Research Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, USA
- Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, USA
| | - B. S. Manjunath
- Vision Research Laboratory, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kievits AJ, Lane R, Carroll EC, Hoogenboom JP. How innovations in methodology offer new prospects for volume electron microscopy. J Microsc 2022; 287:114-137. [PMID: 35810393 PMCID: PMC9546337 DOI: 10.1111/jmi.13134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2022] [Revised: 06/29/2022] [Accepted: 07/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Detailed knowledge of biological structure has been key in understanding biology at several levels of organisation, from organs to cells and proteins. Volume electron microscopy (volume EM) provides high resolution 3D structural information about tissues on the nanometre scale. However, the throughput rate of conventional electron microscopes has limited the volume size and number of samples that can be imaged. Recent improvements in methodology are currently driving a revolution in volume EM, making possible the structural imaging of whole organs and small organisms. In turn, these recent developments in image acquisition have created or stressed bottlenecks in other parts of the pipeline, like sample preparation, image analysis and data management. While the progress in image analysis is stunning due to the advent of automatic segmentation and server‐based annotation tools, several challenges remain. Here we discuss recent trends in volume EM, emerging methods for increasing throughput and implications for sample preparation, image analysis and data management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arent J. Kievits
- Imaging Physics Delft University of Technology Delft 2624CJ The Netherlands
| | - Ryan Lane
- Imaging Physics Delft University of Technology Delft 2624CJ The Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Matejek B, Wei D, Chen T, Tsourakakis CE, Mitzenmacher M, Pfister H. Edge-colored directed subgraph enumeration on the connectome. Sci Rep 2022; 12:11349. [PMID: 35790766 PMCID: PMC9256670 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-15027-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Accepted: 06/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Following significant advances in image acquisition, synapse detection, and neuronal segmentation in connectomics, researchers have extracted an increasingly diverse set of wiring diagrams from brain tissue. Neuroscientists frequently represent these wiring diagrams as graphs with nodes corresponding to a single neuron and edges indicating synaptic connectivity. The edges can contain "colors" or "labels", indicating excitatory versus inhibitory connections, among other things. By representing the wiring diagram as a graph, we can begin to identify motifs, the frequently occurring subgraphs that correspond to specific biological functions. Most analyses on these wiring diagrams have focused on hypothesized motifs-those we expect to find. However, one of the goals of connectomics is to identify biologically-significant motifs that we did not previously hypothesize. To identify these structures, we need large-scale subgraph enumeration to find the frequencies of all unique motifs. Exact subgraph enumeration is a computationally expensive task, particularly in the edge-dense wiring diagrams. Furthermore, most existing methods do not differentiate between types of edges which can significantly affect the function of a motif. We propose a parallel, general-purpose subgraph enumeration strategy to count motifs in the connectome. Next, we introduce a divide-and-conquer community-based subgraph enumeration strategy that allows for enumeration per brain region. Lastly, we allow for differentiation of edges by types to better reflect the underlying biological properties of the graph. We demonstrate our results on eleven connectomes and publish for future analyses extensive overviews for the 26 trillion subgraphs enumerated that required approximately 9.25 years of computation time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian Matejek
- John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
- Computer Science Laboratory, SRI International, Washington, DC, USA.
| | - Donglai Wei
- John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Department of Computer Science, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA
| | - Tianyi Chen
- Department of Computer Science, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Charalampos E Tsourakakis
- John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Department of Computer Science, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
- ISI Foundation, Turin, Italy
| | - Michael Mitzenmacher
- John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Hanspeter Pfister
- John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Park C, Gim J, Lee S, Lee KJ, Kim JS. Automated Synapse Detection Method for Cerebellar Connectomics. Front Neuroanat 2022; 16:760279. [PMID: 35360651 PMCID: PMC8963724 DOI: 10.3389/fnana.2022.760279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2021] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The connectomic analyses of large-scale volumetric electron microscope (EM) images enable the discovery of hidden neural connectivity. While the technologies for neuronal reconstruction of EM images are under rapid progress, the technologies for synapse detection are lagging behind. Here, we propose a method that automatically detects the synapses in the 3D EM images, specifically for the mouse cerebellar molecular layer (CML). The method aims to accurately detect the synapses between the reconstructed neuronal fragments whose types can be identified. It extracts the contacts between the reconstructed neuronal fragments and classifies them as synaptic or non-synaptic with the help of type information and two deep learning artificial intelligences (AIs). The method can also assign the pre- and postsynaptic sides of a synapse and determine excitatory and inhibitory synapse types. The accuracy of this method is estimated to be 0.955 in F1-score for a test volume of CML containing 508 synapses. To demonstrate the usability, we measured the size and number of the synapses in the volume and investigated the subcellular connectivity between the CML neuronal fragments. The basic idea of the method to exploit tissue-specific properties can be extended to other brain regions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Changjoo Park
- Department of Biological Sciences, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon-si, South Korea
- Laboratory of Computational Neuroscience, Korea Brain Research Institute, Daegu, South Korea
- Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science and Technology, Daegu, South Korea
| | - Jawon Gim
- Laboratory of Computational Neuroscience, Korea Brain Research Institute, Daegu, South Korea
- Laboratory of Synaptic Circuit Plasticity in Neural Circuits Research Group, Korea Brain Research Institute, Daegu, South Korea
| | - Sungjin Lee
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science and Technology, Daegu, South Korea
| | - Kea Joo Lee
- Laboratory of Synaptic Circuit Plasticity in Neural Circuits Research Group, Korea Brain Research Institute, Daegu, South Korea
| | - Jinseop S. Kim
- Department of Biological Sciences, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon-si, South Korea
- Laboratory of Computational Neuroscience, Korea Brain Research Institute, Daegu, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wu J, Turner N, Bae JA, Vishwanathan A, Seung HS. RealNeuralNetworks.jl: An Integrated Julia Package for Skeletonization, Morphological Analysis, and Synaptic Connectivity Analysis of Terabyte-Scale 3D Neural Segmentations. Front Neuroinform 2022; 16:828169. [PMID: 35311003 PMCID: PMC8924549 DOI: 10.3389/fninf.2022.828169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2021] [Accepted: 02/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Benefiting from the rapid development of electron microscopy imaging and deep learning technologies, an increasing number of brain image datasets with segmentation and synapse detection are published. Most of the automated segmentation methods label voxels rather than producing neuron skeletons directly. A further skeletonization step is necessary for quantitative morphological analysis. Currently, several tools are published for skeletonization as well as morphological and synaptic connectivity analysis using different computer languages and environments. Recently the Julia programming language, notable for elegant syntax and high performance, has gained rapid adoption in the scientific computing community. Here, we present a Julia package, called RealNeuralNetworks.jl, for efficient sparse skeletonization, morphological analysis, and synaptic connectivity analysis. Based on a large-scale Zebrafish segmentation dataset, we illustrate the software features by performing distributed skeletonization in Google Cloud, clustering the neurons using the NBLAST algorithm, combining morphological similarity and synaptic connectivity to study their relationship. We demonstrate that RealNeuralNetworks.jl is suitable for use in terabyte-scale electron microscopy image segmentation datasets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingpeng Wu
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States
- *Correspondence: Jingpeng Wu,
| | - Nicholas Turner
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States
- Department of Computer Science, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States
| | - J. Alexander Bae
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States
| | - Ashwin Vishwanathan
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States
| | - H. Sebastian Seung
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States
- Department of Computer Science, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Dorkenwald S, McKellar CE, Macrina T, Kemnitz N, Lee K, Lu R, Wu J, Popovych S, Mitchell E, Nehoran B, Jia Z, Bae JA, Mu S, Ih D, Castro M, Ogedengbe O, Halageri A, Kuehner K, Sterling AR, Ashwood Z, Zung J, Brittain D, Collman F, Schneider-Mizell C, Jordan C, Silversmith W, Baker C, Deutsch D, Encarnacion-Rivera L, Kumar S, Burke A, Bland D, Gager J, Hebditch J, Koolman S, Moore M, Morejohn S, Silverman B, Willie K, Willie R, Yu SC, Murthy M, Seung HS. FlyWire: online community for whole-brain connectomics. Nat Methods 2021; 19:119-128. [PMID: 34949809 PMCID: PMC8903166 DOI: 10.1038/s41592-021-01330-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2020] [Accepted: 10/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Due to advances in automated image acquisition and analysis, whole-brain connectomes with 100,000 or more neurons are on the horizon. Proofreading of whole-brain automated reconstructions will require many person-years of effort, due to the huge volumes of data involved. Here we present FlyWire, an online community for proofreading neural circuits in a Drosophila melanogaster brain and explain how its computational and social structures are organized to scale up to whole-brain connectomics. Browser-based three-dimensional interactive segmentation by collaborative editing of a spatially chunked supervoxel graph makes it possible to distribute proofreading to individuals located virtually anywhere in the world. Information in the edit history is programmatically accessible for a variety of uses such as estimating proofreading accuracy or building incentive systems. An open community accelerates proofreading by recruiting more participants and accelerates scientific discovery by requiring information sharing. We demonstrate how FlyWire enables circuit analysis by reconstructing and analyzing the connectome of mechanosensory neurons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sven Dorkenwald
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.,Computer Science Department, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Claire E McKellar
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Thomas Macrina
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.,Computer Science Department, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Nico Kemnitz
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Kisuk Lee
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.,Brain & Cognitive Sciences Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Ran Lu
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Jingpeng Wu
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Sergiy Popovych
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.,Computer Science Department, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Eric Mitchell
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Barak Nehoran
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.,Computer Science Department, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Zhen Jia
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.,Computer Science Department, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - J Alexander Bae
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.,Electrical Engineering Department, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Shang Mu
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Dodam Ih
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Manuel Castro
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | | | - Akhilesh Halageri
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Kai Kuehner
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Amy R Sterling
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Zoe Ashwood
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.,Computer Science Department, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Jonathan Zung
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.,Computer Science Department, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | | | | | | | - Chris Jordan
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | | | - Christa Baker
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - David Deutsch
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | | | - Sandeep Kumar
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Austin Burke
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Doug Bland
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Jay Gager
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - James Hebditch
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Selden Koolman
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Merlin Moore
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Sarah Morejohn
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Ben Silverman
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Kyle Willie
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Ryan Willie
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Szi-Chieh Yu
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Mala Murthy
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
| | - H Sebastian Seung
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA. .,Computer Science Department, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Buhmann J, Sheridan A, Malin-Mayor C, Schlegel P, Gerhard S, Kazimiers T, Krause R, Nguyen TM, Heinrich L, Lee WCA, Wilson R, Saalfeld S, Jefferis GSXE, Bock DD, Turaga SC, Cook M, Funke J. Automatic detection of synaptic partners in a whole-brain Drosophila electron microscopy data set. Nat Methods 2021; 18:771-774. [PMID: 34168373 PMCID: PMC7611460 DOI: 10.1038/s41592-021-01183-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2020] [Accepted: 05/10/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
We develop an automatic method for synaptic partner identification in insect brains and use it to predict synaptic partners in a whole-brain electron microscopy dataset of the fruit fly. The predictions can be used to infer a connectivity graph with high accuracy, thus allowing fast identification of neural pathways. To facilitate circuit reconstruction using our results, we develop CIRCUITMAP, a user interface add-on for the circuit annotation tool CATMAID.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Buhmann
- HHMI Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, VA, USA
- Institute of Neuroinformatics, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | - Stephan Gerhard
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- UniDesign Solutions GmbH, Zürich, Switzerland
| | | | - Renate Krause
- HHMI Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, VA, USA
- Institute of Neuroinformatics, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Matthew Cook
- Institute of Neuroinformatics, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jan Funke
- HHMI Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, VA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Shen FY, Harrington MM, Walker LA, Cheng HPJ, Boyden ES, Cai D. Light microscopy based approach for mapping connectivity with molecular specificity. Nat Commun 2020; 11:4632. [PMID: 32934230 PMCID: PMC7493953 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-18422-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2020] [Accepted: 08/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Mapping neuroanatomy is a foundational goal towards understanding brain function. Electron microscopy (EM) has been the gold standard for connectivity analysis because nanoscale resolution is necessary to unambiguously resolve synapses. However, molecular information that specifies cell types is often lost in EM reconstructions. To address this, we devise a light microscopy approach for connectivity analysis of defined cell types called spectral connectomics. We combine multicolor labeling (Brainbow) of neurons with multi-round immunostaining Expansion Microscopy (miriEx) to simultaneously interrogate morphology, molecular markers, and connectivity in the same brain section. We apply this strategy to directly link inhibitory neuron cell types with their morphologies. Furthermore, we show that correlative Brainbow and endogenous synaptic machinery immunostaining can define putative synaptic connections between neurons, as well as map putative inhibitory and excitatory inputs. We envision that spectral connectomics can be applied routinely in neurobiology labs to gain insights into normal and pathophysiological neuroanatomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fred Y Shen
- Medical Scientist Training Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Margaret M Harrington
- Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Logan A Walker
- LS & A, Program in Biophysics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Hon Pong Jimmy Cheng
- Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Edward S Boyden
- McGovern Institute, Koch Institute, Department of Media Arts and Sciences, Department of Biological Engineering, and Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Dawen Cai
- Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
- Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
- LS & A, Program in Biophysics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Scheffer LK, Xu CS, Januszewski M, Lu Z, Takemura SY, Hayworth KJ, Huang GB, Shinomiya K, Maitlin-Shepard J, Berg S, Clements J, Hubbard PM, Katz WT, Umayam L, Zhao T, Ackerman D, Blakely T, Bogovic J, Dolafi T, Kainmueller D, Kawase T, Khairy KA, Leavitt L, Li PH, Lindsey L, Neubarth N, Olbris DJ, Otsuna H, Trautman ET, Ito M, Bates AS, Goldammer J, Wolff T, Svirskas R, Schlegel P, Neace E, Knecht CJ, Alvarado CX, Bailey DA, Ballinger S, Borycz JA, Canino BS, Cheatham N, Cook M, Dreher M, Duclos O, Eubanks B, Fairbanks K, Finley S, Forknall N, Francis A, Hopkins GP, Joyce EM, Kim S, Kirk NA, Kovalyak J, Lauchie SA, Lohff A, Maldonado C, Manley EA, McLin S, Mooney C, Ndama M, Ogundeyi O, Okeoma N, Ordish C, Padilla N, Patrick CM, Paterson T, Phillips EE, Phillips EM, Rampally N, Ribeiro C, Robertson MK, Rymer JT, Ryan SM, Sammons M, Scott AK, Scott AL, Shinomiya A, Smith C, Smith K, Smith NL, Sobeski MA, Suleiman A, Swift J, Takemura S, Talebi I, Tarnogorska D, Tenshaw E, Tokhi T, Walsh JJ, Yang T, Horne JA, Li F, Parekh R, Rivlin PK, Jayaraman V, Costa M, Jefferis GSXE, Ito K, Saalfeld S, George R, Meinertzhagen IA, Rubin GM, Hess HF, Jain V, Plaza SM. A connectome and analysis of the adult Drosophila central brain. eLife 2020; 9:e57443. [PMID: 32880371 PMCID: PMC7546738 DOI: 10.7554/elife.57443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 429] [Impact Index Per Article: 107.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2020] [Accepted: 09/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The neural circuits responsible for animal behavior remain largely unknown. We summarize new methods and present the circuitry of a large fraction of the brain of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. Improved methods include new procedures to prepare, image, align, segment, find synapses in, and proofread such large data sets. We define cell types, refine computational compartments, and provide an exhaustive atlas of cell examples and types, many of them novel. We provide detailed circuits consisting of neurons and their chemical synapses for most of the central brain. We make the data public and simplify access, reducing the effort needed to answer circuit questions, and provide procedures linking the neurons defined by our analysis with genetic reagents. Biologically, we examine distributions of connection strengths, neural motifs on different scales, electrical consequences of compartmentalization, and evidence that maximizing packing density is an important criterion in the evolution of the fly's brain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louis K Scheffer
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - C Shan Xu
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | | | - Zhiyuan Lu
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
- Life Sciences Centre, Dalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada
| | - Shin-ya Takemura
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Kenneth J Hayworth
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Gary B Huang
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Kazunori Shinomiya
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | | | - Stuart Berg
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Jody Clements
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Philip M Hubbard
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - William T Katz
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Lowell Umayam
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Ting Zhao
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - David Ackerman
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | | | - John Bogovic
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Tom Dolafi
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Dagmar Kainmueller
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Takashi Kawase
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Khaled A Khairy
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | | | - Peter H Li
- Google ResearchMountain ViewUnited States
| | | | - Nicole Neubarth
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Donald J Olbris
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Hideo Otsuna
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Eric T Trautman
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Masayoshi Ito
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
- Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, University of TokyoTokyoJapan
| | | | - Jens Goldammer
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
- Institute of Zoology, Biocenter Cologne, University of CologneCologneGermany
| | - Tanya Wolff
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Robert Svirskas
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | | | - Erika Neace
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | | | - Chelsea X Alvarado
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Dennis A Bailey
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Samantha Ballinger
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | | | - Brandon S Canino
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Natasha Cheatham
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Michael Cook
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Marisa Dreher
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Octave Duclos
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Bryon Eubanks
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Kelli Fairbanks
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Samantha Finley
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Nora Forknall
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Audrey Francis
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | | | - Emily M Joyce
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - SungJin Kim
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Nicole A Kirk
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Julie Kovalyak
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Shirley A Lauchie
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Alanna Lohff
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Charli Maldonado
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Emily A Manley
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Sari McLin
- Life Sciences Centre, Dalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada
| | - Caroline Mooney
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Miatta Ndama
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Omotara Ogundeyi
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Nneoma Okeoma
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Christopher Ordish
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Nicholas Padilla
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | | | - Tyler Paterson
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Elliott E Phillips
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Emily M Phillips
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Neha Rampally
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Caitlin Ribeiro
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | | | - Jon Thomson Rymer
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Sean M Ryan
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Megan Sammons
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Anne K Scott
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Ashley L Scott
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Aya Shinomiya
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Claire Smith
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Kelsey Smith
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Natalie L Smith
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Margaret A Sobeski
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Alia Suleiman
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Jackie Swift
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Satoko Takemura
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Iris Talebi
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | | | - Emily Tenshaw
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Temour Tokhi
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - John J Walsh
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Tansy Yang
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | | | - Feng Li
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Ruchi Parekh
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Patricia K Rivlin
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Vivek Jayaraman
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Marta Costa
- Department of Zoology, University of CambridgeCambridgeUnited Kingdom
| | - Gregory SXE Jefferis
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular BiologyCambridgeUnited States
- Department of Zoology, University of CambridgeCambridgeUnited Kingdom
| | - Kei Ito
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
- Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, University of TokyoTokyoJapan
- Institute of Zoology, Biocenter Cologne, University of CologneCologneGermany
| | - Stephan Saalfeld
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Reed George
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Ian A Meinertzhagen
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
- Life Sciences Centre, Dalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada
| | - Gerald M Rubin
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Harald F Hess
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Viren Jain
- Google Research, Google LLCZurichSwitzerland
| | - Stephen M Plaza
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lin Z, Wei D, Jang WD, Zhou S, Chen X, Wang X, Schalek R, Berger D, Matejek B, Kamentsky L, Peleg A, Haehn D, Jones T, Parag T, Lichtman J, Pfister H. Two Stream Active Query Suggestion for Active Learning in Connectomics. COMPUTER VISION - ECCV ... : ... EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION : PROCEEDINGS. EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION 2020; 12363:103-120. [PMID: 33345257 PMCID: PMC7746018 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-58523-5_7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
For large-scale vision tasks in biomedical images, the labeled data is often limited to train effective deep models. Active learning is a common solution, where a query suggestion method selects representative unlabeled samples for annotation, and the new labels are used to improve the base model. However, most query suggestion models optimize their learnable parameters only on the limited labeled data and consequently become less effective for the more challenging unlabeled data. To tackle this, we propose a two-stream active query suggestion approach. In addition to the supervised feature extractor, we introduce an unsupervised one optimized on all raw images to capture diverse image features, which can later be improved by fine-tuning on new labels. As a use case, we build an end-to-end active learning framework with our query suggestion method for 3D synapse detection and mitochondria segmentation in connectomics. With the framework, we curate, to our best knowledge, the largest connectomics dataset with dense synapses and mitochondria annotation. On this new dataset, our method outperforms previous state-of-the-art methods by 3.1% for synapse and 3.8% for mitochondria in terms of region-of-interest proposal accuracy. We also apply our method to image classification, where it outperforms previous approaches on CIFAR-10 under the same limited annotation budget. The project page is https://zudi-lin.github.io/projects/#two_stream_active.
Collapse
|
16
|
Liu J, Li L, Yang Y, Hong B, Chen X, Xie Q, Han H. Automatic Reconstruction of Mitochondria and Endoplasmic Reticulum in Electron Microscopy Volumes by Deep Learning. Front Neurosci 2020; 14:599. [PMID: 32792893 PMCID: PMC7394701 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2019] [Accepted: 05/15/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Together, mitochondria and the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) occupy more than 20% of a cell's volume, and morphological abnormality may lead to cellular function disorders. With the rapid development of large-scale electron microscopy (EM), manual contouring and three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of these organelles has previously been accomplished in biological studies. However, manual segmentation of mitochondria and ER from EM images is time consuming and thus unable to meet the demands of large data analysis. Here, we propose an automated pipeline for mitochondrial and ER reconstruction, including the mitochondrial and ER contact sites (MAMs). We propose a novel recurrent neural network to detect and segment mitochondria and a fully residual convolutional network to reconstruct the ER. Based on the sparse distribution of synapses, we use mitochondrial context information to rectify the local misleading results and obtain 3D mitochondrial reconstructions. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method achieves state-of-the-art performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Liu
- National Laboratory of Pattern Recognition, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.,School of Artificial Intelligence, School of Future Technology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Linlin Li
- National Laboratory of Pattern Recognition, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Yang Yang
- School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China
| | - Bei Hong
- National Laboratory of Pattern Recognition, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.,School of Artificial Intelligence, School of Future Technology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Xi Chen
- National Laboratory of Pattern Recognition, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Qiwei Xie
- National Laboratory of Pattern Recognition, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.,Data Mining Lab, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, China
| | - Hua Han
- National Laboratory of Pattern Recognition, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.,School of Artificial Intelligence, School of Future Technology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.,CAS Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Lee K, Turner N, Macrina T, Wu J, Lu R, Seung HS. Convolutional nets for reconstructing neural circuits from brain images acquired by serial section electron microscopy. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2019; 55:188-198. [PMID: 31071619 DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2019.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2018] [Revised: 04/05/2019] [Accepted: 04/10/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Neural circuits can be reconstructed from brain images acquired by serial section electron microscopy. Image analysis has been performed by manual labor for half a century, and efforts at automation date back almost as far. Convolutional nets were first applied to neuronal boundary detection a dozen years ago, and have now achieved impressive accuracy on clean images. Robust handling of image defects is a major outstanding challenge. Convolutional nets are also being employed for other tasks in neural circuit reconstruction: finding synapses and identifying synaptic partners, extending or pruning neuronal reconstructions, and aligning serial section images to create a 3D image stack. Computational systems are being engineered to handle petavoxel images of cubic millimeter brain volumes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kisuk Lee
- Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Nicholas Turner
- Department of Computer Science, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08544, USA
| | - Thomas Macrina
- Department of Computer Science, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08544, USA
| | - Jingpeng Wu
- Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08544, USA
| | - Ran Lu
- Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08544, USA
| | - H Sebastian Seung
- Department of Computer Science, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08544, USA; Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08544, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Shinomiya K, Huang G, Lu Z, Parag T, Xu CS, Aniceto R, Ansari N, Cheatham N, Lauchie S, Neace E, Ogundeyi O, Ordish C, Peel D, Shinomiya A, Smith C, Takemura S, Talebi I, Rivlin PK, Nern A, Scheffer LK, Plaza SM, Meinertzhagen IA. Comparisons between the ON- and OFF-edge motion pathways in the Drosophila brain. eLife 2019; 8:40025. [PMID: 30624205 PMCID: PMC6338461 DOI: 10.7554/elife.40025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2018] [Accepted: 01/02/2019] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Understanding the circuit mechanisms behind motion detection is a long-standing question in visual neuroscience. In Drosophila melanogaster, recently discovered synapse-level connectomes in the optic lobe, particularly in ON-pathway (T4) receptive-field circuits, in concert with physiological studies, suggest a motion model that is increasingly intricate when compared with the ubiquitous Hassenstein-Reichardt model. By contrast, our knowledge of OFF-pathway (T5) has been incomplete. Here, we present a conclusive and comprehensive connectome that, for the first time, integrates detailed connectivity information for inputs to both the T4 and T5 pathways in a single EM dataset covering the entire optic lobe. With novel reconstruction methods using automated synapse prediction suited to such a large connectome, we successfully corroborate previous findings in the T4 pathway and comprehensively identify inputs and receptive fields for T5. Although the two pathways are probably evolutionarily linked and exhibit many similarities, we uncover interesting differences and interactions that may underlie their distinct functional properties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazunori Shinomiya
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, United States
| | - Gary Huang
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, United States
| | - Zhiyuan Lu
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, United States.,Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
| | - Toufiq Parag
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, United States.,School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States
| | - C Shan Xu
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, United States
| | - Roxanne Aniceto
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, United States
| | - Namra Ansari
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, United States
| | - Natasha Cheatham
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, United States
| | - Shirley Lauchie
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, United States
| | - Erika Neace
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, United States
| | - Omotara Ogundeyi
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, United States
| | - Christopher Ordish
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, United States
| | - David Peel
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, United States
| | - Aya Shinomiya
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, United States
| | - Claire Smith
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, United States
| | - Satoko Takemura
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, United States
| | - Iris Talebi
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, United States
| | - Patricia K Rivlin
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, United States
| | - Aljoscha Nern
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, United States
| | - Louis K Scheffer
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, United States
| | - Stephen M Plaza
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, United States
| | - Ian A Meinertzhagen
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Staffler B, Berning M, Boergens KM, Gour A, van der Smagt P, Helmstaedter M. SynEM, automated synapse detection for connectomics. eLife 2017; 6:e26414. [PMID: 28708060 PMCID: PMC5658066 DOI: 10.7554/elife.26414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2017] [Accepted: 07/12/2017] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Nerve tissue contains a high density of chemical synapses, about 1 per µm3 in the mammalian cerebral cortex. Thus, even for small blocks of nerve tissue, dense connectomic mapping requires the identification of millions to billions of synapses. While the focus of connectomic data analysis has been on neurite reconstruction, synapse detection becomes limiting when datasets grow in size and dense mapping is required. Here, we report SynEM, a method for automated detection of synapses from conventionally en-bloc stained 3D electron microscopy image stacks. The approach is based on a segmentation of the image data and focuses on classifying borders between neuronal processes as synaptic or non-synaptic. SynEM yields 97% precision and recall in binary cortical connectomes with no user interaction. It scales to large volumes of cortical neuropil, plausibly even whole-brain datasets. SynEM removes the burden of manual synapse annotation for large densely mapped connectomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benedikt Staffler
- Department of Connectomics, Max Planck Institute for Brain Research, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Manuel Berning
- Department of Connectomics, Max Planck Institute for Brain Research, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Kevin M Boergens
- Department of Connectomics, Max Planck Institute for Brain Research, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Anjali Gour
- Department of Connectomics, Max Planck Institute for Brain Research, Frankfurt, Germany
| | | | - Moritz Helmstaedter
- Department of Connectomics, Max Planck Institute for Brain Research, Frankfurt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Kaltdorf KV, Schulze K, Helmprobst F, Kollmannsberger P, Dandekar T, Stigloher C. FIJI Macro 3D ART VeSElecT: 3D Automated Reconstruction Tool for Vesicle Structures of Electron Tomograms. PLoS Comput Biol 2017; 13:e1005317. [PMID: 28056033 PMCID: PMC5289597 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2016] [Revised: 02/02/2017] [Accepted: 12/18/2016] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Automatic image reconstruction is critical to cope with steadily increasing data from advanced microscopy. We describe here the Fiji macro 3D ART VeSElecT which we developed to study synaptic vesicles in electron tomograms. We apply this tool to quantify vesicle properties (i) in embryonic Danio rerio 4 and 8 days past fertilization (dpf) and (ii) to compare Caenorhabditis elegans N2 neuromuscular junctions (NMJ) wild-type and its septin mutant (unc-59(e261)). We demonstrate development-specific and mutant-specific changes in synaptic vesicle pools in both models. We confirm the functionality of our macro by applying our 3D ART VeSElecT on zebrafish NMJ showing smaller vesicles in 8 dpf embryos then 4 dpf, which was validated by manual reconstruction of the vesicle pool. Furthermore, we analyze the impact of C. elegans septin mutant unc-59(e261) on vesicle pool formation and vesicle size. Automated vesicle registration and characterization was implemented in Fiji as two macros (registration and measurement). This flexible arrangement allows in particular reducing false positives by an optional manual revision step. Preprocessing and contrast enhancement work on image-stacks of 1nm/pixel in x and y direction. Semi-automated cell selection was integrated. 3D ART VeSElecT removes interfering components, detects vesicles by 3D segmentation and calculates vesicle volume and diameter (spherical approximation, inner/outer diameter). Results are collected in color using the RoiManager plugin including the possibility of manual removal of non-matching confounder vesicles. Detailed evaluation considered performance (detected vesicles) and specificity (true vesicles) as well as precision and recall. We furthermore show gain in segmentation and morphological filtering compared to learning based methods and a large time gain compared to manual segmentation. 3D ART VeSElecT shows small error rates and its speed gain can be up to 68 times faster in comparison to manual annotation. Both automatic and semi-automatic modes are explained including a tutorial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin Verena Kaltdorf
- Division of Electron Microscopy, Biocenter, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
- Department of Bioinformatics, Biocenter, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Katja Schulze
- Molecular Biotechnology and Functional Genomics, Technical University of Applied Sciences Wildau, Wildau, Germany
| | - Frederik Helmprobst
- Division of Electron Microscopy, Biocenter, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Philip Kollmannsberger
- Center for Computational and Theoretical Biology, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Thomas Dandekar
- Department of Bioinformatics, Biocenter, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
- * E-mail: (TD); (CS)
| | - Christian Stigloher
- Division of Electron Microscopy, Biocenter, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
- * E-mail: (TD); (CS)
| |
Collapse
|