Short Term Oral Methylergonovine Maleate Prophylaxis for Status Migrainosus. Case Series and Review of Literature

Real-world approaches to outpatient treatment of status migrainosus: A survey study

OBJECTIVES

Identify how the American Headache Society (AHS) membership manages status migrainosus (SM) among outpatients.

BACKGROUND

SM is defined as a debilitating migraine attack lasting more than 72 h. There is no standard of care for SM, including whether a 72-h duration is required before the attack can be treated as SM.

METHODS

The Refractory Headache Special Interest Group from AHS developed a four-question survey distributed to AHS members enquiring (1) whether they treat severe refractory migraine attacks the same as SM regardless of duration, (2) what their first step in SM management is, (3) what the top three medications they use for SM are, and (4) whether they are United Council for Neurologic Subspecialties (UCNS) certified. The survey was conducted in January 2022. Descriptive statistical analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Responses were received from 196 of 1859 (10.5%) AHS members; 64.3% were UCNS certified in headache management. Respondents treated 69.4% (136/196) of patients with a severe refractory migraine attack as SM before the 72-h period had elapsed. Most (76.0%, 149/196) chose "treat remotely using outpatient medications at home" as the first step, 11.2% (22/196) preferred procedures, 6.1% (12/196) favored an infusion center, 6.1% (12/196) sent patients to the emergency department (ED) or urgent care, and 0.5% (1/196) preferred direct hospital admission. The top five preferred medications were as follows: (1) corticosteroids (71.4%, 140/196), (2) nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (50.1%, 99/196), (3) neuroleptics (46.9%, 92/196), (4) triptans (30.6%, 60/196), and (5) dihydroergotamine (DHE) (21.4%, 42/196).

CONCLUSIONS

Healthcare professionals with expertise in headache medicine typically treated severe migraine attacks early and did not wait 72 h to fulfill the diagnostic criteria for SM. Outpatient management with one or more medications for home use was preferred by most respondents; few opted for ED referrals. Finally, corticosteroids, NSAIDs, neuroleptics, triptans, and DHE were the top five preferred treatments for home SM management.

Structural insights into the unexpected agonism of tetracyclic antidepressants at serotonin receptors 5-HT1eR and 5-HT1FR

Serotonin [5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)] acts via 13 different receptors in humans. Of these receptor subtypes, all but 5-HT1eR have confirmed roles in native tissue and are validated drug targets. Despite 5-HT1eR's therapeutic potential and plausible druggability, the mechanisms of its activation remain elusive. To illuminate 5-HT1eR's pharmacology in relation to the highly homologous 5-HT1FR, we screened a library of aminergic receptor ligands at both receptors and observe 5-HT1eR/5-HT1FR agonism by multicyclic drugs described as pan-antagonists at 5-HT receptors. Potent agonism by tetracyclic antidepressants mianserin, setiptiline, and mirtazapine suggests a mechanism for their clinically observed antimigraine properties. Using cryo-EM and mutagenesis studies, we uncover and characterize unique agonist-like binding poses of mianserin and setiptiline at 5-HT1eR distinct from similar drug scaffolds in inactive-state 5-HTR structures. Together with computational studies, our data suggest that these binding poses alongside receptor-specific allosteric coupling in 5-HT1eR and 5-HT1FR contribute to the agonist activity of these antidepressants.

Structural Insights into the Unexpected Agonism of Tetracyclic Antidepressants at Serotonin Receptors 5-HT1eR and 5-HT1FR

Serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT) acts via 13 different receptors in humans. Of these receptor subtypes, all but 5-HT1eR have confirmed roles in native tissue and are validated drug targets. Despite 5-HT1eR's therapeutic potential and plausible druggability, the mechanisms of its activation remain elusive. To illuminate 5-HT1eR's pharmacology in relation to the highly homologous 5-HT1FR, we screened a library of aminergic receptor ligands at both receptors and observe 5-HT1e/1FR agonism by multicyclic drugs described as pan-antagonists at 5-HT receptors. Potent agonism by tetracyclic antidepressants mianserin, setiptiline, and mirtazapine suggests a mechanism for their clinically observed anti-migraine properties. Using cryoEM and mutagenesis studies, we uncover and characterize unique agonist-like binding poses of mianserin and setiptiline at 5-HT1eR distinct from similar drug scaffolds in inactive-state 5-HTR structures. Together with computational studies, our data suggest that these binding poses alongside receptor-specific allosteric coupling in 5-HT1eR and 5-HT1FR contribute to the agonist activity of these antidepressants.

Breaking the cycle: unraveling the diagnostic, pathophysiological and treatment challenges of refractory migraine

Background

Refractory migraine is a poorly described complication of migraine in which migraine has chronified and become resistant to standard treatments. The true prevalence is unknown, but medication resistance is common in headache clinic patient populations. Given the lack of response to treatment, this patient population is extremely difficult to treat with limited guidance in the literature.

Objective

To review the diagnostic, pathophysiological, and management challenges in the refractory migraine population.

Discussion

There are no accepted, or even ICHD-3 appendix, diagnostic criteria for refractory migraine though several proposed criteria exist. Current proposed criteria often have low bars for refractoriness while also not meeting the needs of pediatrics, lower socioeconomic status, and developing nations. Pathophysiology is unknown but can be hypothesized as a persistent "on" state as a progression from chronic migraine with increasing central sensitization, but there may be heterogeneity in the underlying pathophysiology. No guidelines exist for treatment of refractory migraine; once all guideline-based treatments are tried, treatment consists of n-of-1 treatment trials paired with non-pharmacologic management.

Conclusion

Refractory migraine is poorly described diagnostically, its pathophysiology can only be guessed at by extension of chronic migraine, and treatment is more the art than science of medicine. Navigating care of this refractory population will require multidisciplinary care models and an emphasis on future research to answer these unknowns.

Designing the 5HT2BR structure and its modulation as a therapeutic target for repurposing approach in drug-resistant epilepsy

The study intends to repurpose FDA drugs and investigate the mechanism of (5HT_2BR) activation by comprehending inter-residue interactions. The 5HT_2BR is a novel thread, and its role in reducing seizures in Dravet syndrome is emerging. The crystal structure (5HT_2BR) is a chimera with mutations; hence 3D-structure is modeled (4IB4: 5HT_2BR_M). The structure is cross-validated to simulate the human receptor using enrichment analysis (ROC: 0.79) and SAVESv6.0. Virtual screening of 2456 approved drugs yielded the best hits that are subjected to MM/GBSA and molecular dynamic (MD) simulations. The 2 top drugs Cabergoline (-53.44 kcal/mol) and Methylergonovine (-40.42 kcal/mol), display strong binding affinity, and ADMET/SAR analysis also suggests their non-mutagenic or non-carcinogenic nature. Methylergonovine has a weaker binding affinity and lower potency than standards [Ergotamine (agonist) and Methysergide (antagonist)] due to its higher K_i (1.32 M) and K_d (6.44 ×10^-8 M) values. Compared to standards, Cabergoline has moderate binding affinity and potency [K_i = 0.85 M and K_d = 5.53 × 10-8 M]. The top 2 drugs primarily interact with conserved residues (ASP135, LEU209, GLY221, ALA225, and THR140) as in agonists, unlike the antagonist. The top 2 drugs, upon binding to the 5HT_2BR_M, modify the helices VI, V, and III and shift the RMSD 2.48 Å and 3.07 Å. LEU209 forms a latch with residues 207-214 (forms a lid) in the 5HT_2BR_M receptor, which enhances agonist binding and prevents drug escape. Methylergonovine and Cabergoline interact more stongly with ALA225 than the antagonist. The post-MD analysis of Cabergoline suggests a better MM/GBSA value (-89.21 kcal/mol) than Methylergonovine (-63.54 kcal/mol). In this study, Cabergoline and Methylergonovine's agonistic mechanism and solid binding properties suggest their strong role in regulating the 5HT_2BR and might target drug-resistant epilepsy.

Thalamic atrophy in patients with pure hereditary spastic paraplegia type 4

SPG4 is an autosomal dominant pure form of hereditary spastic paraplegia (HSP) caused by mutations in the SPAST gene. HSP is considered an upper motor neuron disorder characterized by progressive spasticity and weakness of the lower limbs caused by degeneration of the corticospinal tract. In other neurodegenerative motor disorders, the thalamus and basal ganglia are affected, with a considerable impact on disease progression. However, only a few works have studied these brain structures in HSP, mainly in complex forms of this disease. Our research aims to detect potential alterations in the volume and shape of the thalamus and various basal ganglia structures by comparing 12 patients with pure HSP and 18 healthy controls. We used two neuroimaging procedures: automated segmentation of the subcortical structures (thalamus, hippocampus, caudate nucleus, globus pallidus, and putamen) in native space and shape analysis of the structures. We found a significant reduction in thalamic volume bilaterally, as well as an inward deformation, mainly in the sensory-motor thalamic regions in patients with pure HSP and a mutation in SPG4. We also observed a significant negative correlation between the shape of the thalamus and clinical scores (the Spastic Paraplegia Rating Scale score and disease duration). Moreover, we found a 'Group × Age' interaction that was closely related to the severity of the disease. No differences in volume or in shape were found in the remaining subcortical structures studied. Our results suggest that changes in structure of the thalamus could be an imaging biomarker of disease progression in pHSP.

Emergency Department and Inpatient Management of Headache in Adults

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article reviews treatment options for patients presenting with headache in the emergency department (ED) and for inpatients, including red flags and status migrainosus (SM).

RECENT FINDINGS

Most patients presenting with headache in the ED will have migraine, but red flags must be reviewed to rule out secondary headaches. SM refractory to home treatment is a common reason for ED presentation or inpatient admission, but high-quality treatment evidence is lacking. Common treatments include intravenous fluids, anti-dopaminergic agents with diphenhydramine, steroids, divalproex, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, intravenous dihydroergotamine, and nerve blocks. Other therapies (e.g., ketamine and lidocaine) are used with limited or inconsistent evidence. There is evidence for inpatient behavioral management therapy. This article details red flags to review in the workup of headache presentation in the ED and provides a step-wise approach to ED and inpatient management. However, more studies are needed to better optimize care.