Recurrence of Anti-N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor Encephalitis: A Cohort Study in Central China

Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Treatment for Anti-N-Methyl-d-Aspartate Receptor Encephalitis Without Tumor in Children

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of rituximab treatment for anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis without tumor in children.

METHODS

Eighteen pediatric patients with NMDAR encephalitis treated with rituximab after failure of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and methylprednisolone treatment were analyzed retrospectively in terms of their medical history, clinical features, laboratory examination results, and treatments. The modified Rankin scale (mRS) score, peripheral blood CD19+ B cells, recurrence, and adverse events were used to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rituximab.

RESULTS

The patients were treated with rituximab 3.2 ± 1.0 days after the end of IVIG and methylprednisolone treatment. After initial rituximab treatment for four weeks, the mRS score and number of CD19+ B cells in all patients were significantly lower than those before treatment (P < 0.05). At the last follow-up (44.1 months, 17.7 S.D.), all patients had recovered well (mRS ≤2), 14 patients (77.8%) recovered completely (mRS = 0), three patients had recurrent seizures, and one patient had mental and language impairment. Two patients had transient mild adverse events during infusion, and none of the other patients experienced severe adverse events during hospitalization or follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Rituximab appears safe and may be effective for the treatment of anti-NMDAR encephalitis without tumor in children refractory to first-line agents.

Development of a short-term prognostic model for anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis in Chinese patients

BACKGROUND

Recognizing the predictors of poor short-term prognosis after first-line immunotherapy in patients with anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (anti-NMDAR) encephalitis is essential for individualized treatment strategy. The objective of this study was to ascertain the factors that forecast short-term prognosis in patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis, develop a prognostic prediction model, and authenticate its efficacy in an external validation cohort. Further, all patients were followed-up long-term to assess the factors of long-term outcome and relapses.

METHODS

A prospective enrollment of patients diagnosed with anti-NMDAR encephalitis was conducted across five clinical centers in China from June 2014 to Mar 2022. The enrolled patients were divided into the derivation and validation sets based on enrollment time. The short-term prognostic model was visualized using a nomogram. Further, all patients were followed-up long-term to assess the factors of long-term outcome.

RESULTS

This study found that poor short-term prognosis was a risk factor for poor long-term outcome (6-month prognosis, OR 29.792, 95%CI 6.507-136.398, p < 0.001; 12-month prognosis, OR 15.756, 95%CI 3.384-73.075, p < 0.001; 24-month prognosis, OR 5.500, 95%CI 1.045-28.955, p = 0.044). Abnormal behavior or cognitive dysfunction (OR 8.57, 95%CI 1.48-49.79, p = 0.017), consciousness impairment (OR19.32, 95%CI 3.03-123.09, p = 0.002), autonomic dysfunction or central hypoventilation (OR 5.66, 95%CI 1.25-25.75, p = 0.025), CSF pleocytosis (OR 4.33, 95%CI 1.48-12.65, p = 0.007), abnormal EEG (OR 5.48, 95% CI 1.09-27.54, p = 0.039) were independent predictors for a poor short-term prognosis after first-line immunotherapy. A nomogram that incorporated those factors showed good discrimination and calibration abilities. The area under the curve (AUC) for the prognostic model were 0.866 (95%CI: 0.798-0.934) with a sensitivity of 0.761 and specificity of 0.869.

CONCLUSION

We established and validated a prognostic model that can provide individual prediction of short-term prognosis after first-line immunotherapy for patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis. This practical prognostic model may help neurologists to predict the short-term prognosis early and potentially assist in adjusting appropriate treatment timely.

Transition to Adult Rheumatology Care: A Disease-Specific Guide

ABSTRACT

Young adults with childhood-onset rheumatic diseases are more frequently establishing and continuing care with adult rheumatologists. The transfer of care can be challenging for both the young adult patients and their adult rheumatologists, in large part due to differences between pediatric-onset rheumatic diseases and their adult-onset counterparts, or due to the rarity of some pediatric-onset rheumatic conditions. Other challenges are due to cultural differences between pediatric and adult medical care and to the young adult needing to increasingly perform self-management skills that were previously managed by parents or other caregivers. In this review, we will provide a summary of strategies for working effectively with young adults as they transition to adult care. We will then discuss a subset of childhood-onset rheumatic diseases-including juvenile idiopathic arthritis, localized scleroderma, autoinflammatory diseases, pediatric-onset systemic lupus erythematosus, juvenile-onset dermatomyositis, and autoimmune encephalitis-for which clinical manifestations, management, and prognosis frequently differ between pediatric onset and adult onset. Our aim is to highlight differences that make caring for this population of transitioning young adults unique, providing tools and knowledge to empower the adult rheumatologist to care for these young adults in ways that are evidence-based, effective, efficient, and rewarding.

Brain magnetic resonance imaging as predictors in pediatric anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the associations between brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) changes and clinical profiles in children with anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis.

METHODS

Clinical data and brain MRI results of children diagnosed with anti-NMDAR encephalitis in Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center from October 2014 to June 2022 were retrospectively studied.

RESULTS

A total of 143 children (Male: female 54:89) were enrolled, with a mean onset age of 6.8 years (6.8 ± 3.1). 40.6 % (58/143) of patients had abnormal initial brain MRI. Lesions in temporal lobe (34.5 %, 20/58) and frontal lobe (25.9 %, 15/58) were relatively common. Children with abnormal initial brain MRI were prone to have fever (P = 0.023), dystonia (P = 0.037), positive MOG antibodies (P = 0.015), higher cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) white blood cell count (WBC) (P = 0.019) and to receive rituximab treatment (P = 0.037). There were no significant differences in modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores before immunotherapy, after immunotherapy and at last follow-up between the normal initial brain MRI group and abnormal group. No initial brain MRI changes were found to be associated with relapses. Brain MRI was reviewed in 72 patients at last follow-up with a median follow-up time of 25.5 months and 48.6 % (35/72) of patients had abnormal brain MRI. The mRS score of the group with normal brain MRI at last follow-up was significantly lower than that of the abnormal group.

CONCLUSIONS

About 40.0 % of children with anti-NMDAR encephalitis had abnormal initial brain MRI. Initial brain MRI was associated with certain clinical profiles, but not with relapse and prognosis. Around half of patients had abnormal brain MRI at last follow-up and were prone to have higher mRS score.

Relapses of Anti-NMDAR, Anti-GABABR and Anti-LGI1 Encephalitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Objective

To investigate the relapse rate and study the factors that may predict the subsequent relapse in anti-NMDAR, anti-GABABR and anti-LGI1 encephalitis in Northeast China.

Methods

In the retrospective cohort study, we consecutively enrolled patients with anti-N1MDAR, anti-GABABR and anti-LGI1 encephalitis between March 2015 and November 2021. The patients were followed up for at least 6 months. The outcome variable was a binary variable of relapse or not. Predictors of relapse were identified.

Results

A total of 100 patients were enrolled. Relapse occurred in 26 (26%) patients after a median follow-up of 18 months since the first event. The relapse rates of anti - NMDAR, anti - GABABR and anti - LGI1 encephalitis were 25%, 33.3%, and 28.6%, respectively. The multivariable analysis results suggested that immunotherapy delay at the acute phase was independently associated with an increased risk of relapse in total patients (HR = 2.447, 95% CI = 1.027 - 5.832; P = 0.043). Subgroup analysis results showed that antibody titer was associated with the likelihood of relapse in anti-LGI1 encephalitis. The higher the concentration, the more likely it was for patients to have relapse (p=0.019).

Conclusion

The general relapse rate of anti-NMDAR, anti-GABABR and anti-LGI1 encephalitis was 26%. The risk of subsequent relapse was elevated in those with delayed immunotherapy in the first episode. In subgroup of anti-LGI1 encephalitis, higher antibody titer was the risk factors of relapse. Thus, timely and aggressive immunotherapy may be beneficial for patients to prevent subsequent relapse.