RISC-y Business: Limitations of Short Hairpin RNA-Mediated Gene Silencing in the Brain and a Discussion of CRISPR/Cas-Based Alternatives

Long non-coding RNA LIP interacts with PARP-1 influencing the efficiency of base excision repair

In recent years, various long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) involved in DNA damage response (DDR) have been identified and studied to deepen our understanding. However, there are rare reports on the association between lncRNAs and base excision repair (BER). Our designed DNA microarray identified dozens of functionally unknown lncRNAs, and their transcription levels significantly increased upon exposure to DNA damage inducers. One of them, named LIP (Long noncoding RNA Interacts with PARP-1), exhibited a significant alteration in transcription in response to methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) and temozolomide (TMZ) treatments. LIP knockdown or knockout cell lines are sensitive to MMS and TMZ, indicating that LIP plays a crucial role in DDR. The loss or insufficiency of LIP significantly influences the efficiency of BER in human cells, and it suggests that LIP participates in the BER pathway. The interaction between LIP and a key factor in BER, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP-1), has been confirmed. We identified and characterized LIP, a lncRNA, which is involved in DDR, significantly influences BER efficiency, and interacts with the BER key factor PARP-1. This advances our understanding of the connection between lncRNAs and BER, presenting the potential for the discovery of new drug targets.

The ISR downstream target ATF4 represses long-term memory in a cell type-specific manner

The integrated stress response (ISR), a pivotal protein homeostasis network, plays a critical role in the formation of long-term memory (LTM). The precise mechanism by which the ISR controls LTM is not well understood. Here, we report insights into how the ISR modulates the mnemonic process by using targeted deletion of the activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4), a key downstream effector of the ISR, in various neuronal and non-neuronal cell types. We found that the removal of ATF4 from forebrain excitatory neurons (but not from inhibitory neurons, cholinergic neurons, or astrocytes) enhances LTM formation. Furthermore, the deletion of ATF4 in excitatory neurons lowers the threshold for the induction of long-term potentiation, a cellular model for LTM. Transcriptomic and proteomic analyses revealed that ATF4 deletion in excitatory neurons leads to upregulation of components of oxidative phosphorylation pathways, which are critical for ATP production. Thus, we conclude that ATF4 functions as a memory repressor selectively within excitatory neurons.

CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing of CCR5 combined with C46 HIV-1 fusion inhibitor for cellular resistant to R5 and X4 tropic HIV-1

Hematopoietic stem-cell (HSC) transplantation using a donor with a homozygous mutation in the HIV co-receptor CCR5 (CCR5Δ32/Δ32) holds great promise as a cure for HIV-1. Previously, there were three patients that had been reported to be completely cured from HIV infection by this approach. However, finding a naturally suitable Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA)-matched homozygous CCR5Δ32 donor is very difficult. The prevalence of this allele is only 1% in the Caucasian population. Therefore, additional sources of CCR5Δ32/Δ32 HSCs are required. The Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated (Cas) system is one method to mediate CCR5 knockout in HSCs that has been successfully employed as a gene editing tool in clinical trials. Additional anti-HIV-1 strategies are still required for broad-spectrum inhibition of HIV-1 replication. Here in this study, we combined an additional anti-HIV-1 therapy, which is C46, a cell membrane-anchored HIV-1 fusion inhibitor with the CRISPR/Cas9 mediated knockout CCR5. The combined HIV-1 therapeutic genes were investigated for the potential prevention of both CCR5 (R5)- and CXCR4 (X4)-tropic HIV-1 infections in the MT4CCR5 cell line. The combinatorial CRISPR/Cas9 therapies were superior compared to single method therapy for achieving the HIV-1 cure strategy and shows potential for future applications.

A model of human neural networks reveals NPTX2 pathology in ALS and FTLD

Human cellular models of neurodegeneration require reproducibility and longevity, which is necessary for simulating age-dependent diseases. Such systems are particularly needed for TDP-43 proteinopathies1, which involve human-specific mechanisms2-5 that cannot be directly studied in animal models. Here, to explore the emergence and consequences of TDP-43 pathologies, we generated induced pluripotent stem cell-derived, colony morphology neural stem cells (iCoMoNSCs) via manual selection of neural precursors6. Single-cell transcriptomics and comparison to independent neural stem cells7 showed that iCoMoNSCs are uniquely homogenous and self-renewing. Differentiated iCoMoNSCs formed a self-organized multicellular system consisting of synaptically connected and electrophysiologically active neurons, which matured into long-lived functional networks (which we designate iNets). Neuronal and glial maturation in iNets was similar to that of cortical organoids8. Overexpression of wild-type TDP-43 in a minority of neurons within iNets led to progressive fragmentation and aggregation of the protein, resulting in a partial loss of function and neurotoxicity. Single-cell transcriptomics revealed a novel set of misregulated RNA targets in TDP-43-overexpressing neurons and in patients with TDP-43 proteinopathies exhibiting a loss of nuclear TDP-43. The strongest misregulated target encoded the synaptic protein NPTX2, the levels of which are controlled by TDP-43 binding on its 3' untranslated region. When NPTX2 was overexpressed in iNets, it exhibited neurotoxicity, whereas correcting NPTX2 misregulation partially rescued neurons from TDP-43-induced neurodegeneration. Notably, NPTX2 was consistently misaccumulated in neurons from patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal lobar degeneration with TDP-43 pathology. Our work directly links TDP-43 misregulation and NPTX2 accumulation, thereby revealing a TDP-43-dependent pathway of neurotoxicity.

Current therapies for osteoarthritis and prospects of CRISPR-based genome, epigenome, and RNA editing in osteoarthritis treatment

Osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the most common degenerative joint diseases worldwide, causing pain, disability, and decreased quality of life. The balance between regeneration and inflammation-induced degradation results in multiple etiologies and complex pathogenesis of OA. Currently, there is a lack of effective therapeutic strategies for OA treatment. With the development of CRISPR-based genome, epigenome, and RNA editing tools, OA treatment has been improved by targeting genetic risk factors, activating chondrogenic elements, and modulating inflammatory regulators. Supported by cell therapy and in vivo delivery vectors, genome, epigenome, and RNA editing tools may provide a promising approach for personalized OA therapy. This review summarizes CRISPR-based genome, epigenome, and RNA editing tools that can be applied to the treatment of OA and provides insights into the development of CRISPR-based therapeutics for OA treatment. Moreover, in-depth evaluations of the efficacy and safety of these tools in human OA treatment are needed.

Advances in RNA therapeutics for modulation of 'undruggable' targets

Over the past decades, drug discovery utilizing small pharmacological compounds, fragment-based therapeutics, and antibody therapy have significantly advanced treatment options for many human diseases. However, a major bottleneck has been that>70% of human proteins/genomic regions are 'undruggable' by the above-mentioned approaches. Many of these proteins constitute essential drug targets against complex multifactorial diseases like cancer, immunological disorders, and neurological diseases. Therefore, alternative approaches are required to target these proteins or genomic regions in human cells. RNA therapeutics is a promising approach for many of the traditionally 'undruggable' targets by utilizing methods such as antisense oligonucleotides, RNA interference, CRISPR/Cas-based genome editing, aptamers, and the development of mRNA therapeutics. In the following chapter, we will put emphasis on recent advancements utilizing these approaches against challenging drug targets, such as intranuclear proteins, intrinsically disordered proteins, untranslated genomic regions, and targets expressed in inaccessible tissues.

Construction of a Set of Novel Transposon Vectors for Efficient Silencing of Protein and lncRNA Genes via CRISPR Interference

In recent years, CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) technology of gene silencing has emerged as a promising alternative to RNA interference (RNAi) surpassing the latter in terms of efficiency and accuracy. Here, we describe the construction of a set of transposon vectors suitable for constitutive or tetracycline (doxycycline)-inducible silencing of genes of interest via CRISPRi method and conferring three different antibiotic resistances, using vectors available via Addgene repository. We have analyzed the performance of the new vectors in the silencing of mouse Adam10 and human lncRNA, NORAD. The empty vector variants can be used to efficiently silence any genes of interest.

Neurexin-3 subsynaptic densities are spatially distinct from Neurexin-1 and essential for excitatory synapse nanoscale organization in the hippocampus

Proteins critical for synaptic transmission are non-uniformly distributed and assembled into regions of high density called subsynaptic densities (SSDs) that transsynaptically align in nanocolumns. Neurexin-1 and neurexin-3 are essential presynaptic adhesion molecules that non-redundantly control NMDAR- and AMPAR-mediated synaptic transmission, respectively, via transsynaptic interactions with distinct postsynaptic ligands. Despite their functional relevance, fundamental questions regarding the nanoscale properties of individual neurexins, their influence on the subsynaptic organization of excitatory synapses and the mechanisms controlling how individual neurexins engage in precise transsynaptic interactions are unknown. Using Double Helix 3D dSTORM and neurexin mouse models, we identify neurexin-3 as a critical presynaptic adhesion molecule that regulates excitatory synapse nano-organization in hippocampus. Furthermore, endogenous neurexin-1 and neurexin-3 form discrete and non-overlapping SSDs that are enriched opposite their postsynaptic ligands. Thus, the nanoscale organization of neurexin-1 and neurexin-3 may explain how individual neurexins signal in parallel to govern different synaptic properties.

"Disruption of Golgi markers by two RILP-directed shRNAs in neurons: a new role for RILP or a neuron-specific off-target phenotype?"

In neurons, degradation of dendritic cargos requires RAB7 and dynein-mediated retrograde transport to somatic lysosomes. To test if the dynein adaptor RILP (RAB-interacting lysosomal protein) mediated the recruitment of dynein to late endosomes for retrograde transport in dendrites, we obtained several knockdown reagents previously validated in non-neuronal cells. Striking endosomal phenotypes elicited by one shRILP plasmid were not reproduced by another one. Furthermore, we discovered a profound depletion of Golgi/TGN markers for both shRILP plasmids. This Golgi disruption was only observed in neurons and could not be rescued by re-expression of RILP. This Golgi phenotype was also not found in neurons treated with siRILP or gRILP/Cas9. Lastly, we tested if a different RAB protein that interacts with RILP, namely the Golgi-associated RAB34, might be responsible for the loss of Golgi markers. Expression of a dominant-negative RAB34 did indeed cause changes in Golgi staining in a small subset of neurons but manifested as fragmentation rather than loss of staining. Unlike in non-neuronal cells, interference with RAB34 did not cause dispersal of lysosomes in neurons. Based on multiple lines of experimentation, we conclude that the neuronal Golgi phenotype observed with shRILP is likely off-target in this cell type specifically. Any observed disruptions of endosomal trafficking caused by shRILP in neurons might thus be downstream of Golgi disruption. It would be interesting to identify the actual target for this neuronal Golgi phenotype. Cell type-specific off-target phenotypes therefore likely occur in neurons, necessitating re-validation of reagents that were previously validated in other cell types.

Contrastsing synaptic roles of MDGA1 and MDGA2

Neurodevelopmental disorders are frequently linked to mutations in synaptic organizing molecules. MAM domain containing glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor 1 and 2 (MDGA1 and MDGA2) are a family of synaptic organizers suggested to play an unusual role as synaptic repressors, but studies offer conflicting evidence for their localization. Using epitope-tagged MDGA1 and MDGA2 knock-in mice, we found that native MDGAs are expressed throughout the brain, peaking early in postnatal development. Surprisingly, endogenous MDGA1 was enriched at excitatory, but not inhibitory, synapses. Both shRNA knockdown and CRISPR/Cas9 knockout of MDGA1 resulted in cell-autonomous, specific impairment of AMPA receptor-mediated synaptic transmission, without affecting GABAergic transmission. Conversely, MDGA2 knockdown/knockout selectively depressed NMDA receptor-mediated transmission but enhanced inhibitory transmission. Our results establish that MDGA2 acts as a synaptic repressor, but only at inhibitory synapses, whereas both MDGAs are required for excitatory transmission. This nonoverlapping division of labor between two highly conserved synaptic proteins is unprecedented.

"Disruption of Golgi markers by two RILP-directed shRNAs in neurons: a new role for RILP or a neuron-specific off-target phenotype?"

In neurons, degradation of dendritic cargos requires RAB7 and dynein-mediated retrograde transport to somatic lysosomes. In order to test if the dynein adaptor RILP (RAB-interacting lysosomal protein) mediated the recruitment of dynein to late endosomes for retrograde transport in dendrites, we obtained several knockdown reagents which had been previously validated in non-neuronal cells. We found that striking endosomal phenotypes elicited by one shRILP plasmid were not reproduced by another one. Furthermore, we discovered a profound depletion of Golgi/TGN markers for both shRILP plasmids. This Golgi disruption was only observed in neurons and could not be rescued by re-expression of RILP. This Golgi phenotype was also not found in neurons treated with siRILP or gRILP/Cas9. Lastly, we tested if a different RAB protein that interacts with RILP, namely the Golgi-associated RAB34, might be responsible for the loss of Golgi markers. Expression of a dominant-negative RAB34 did indeed cause changes in Golgi staining in a small subset of neurons but manifested as fragmentation rather than loss of markers. Unlike in non-neuronal cells, interference with RAB34 did not cause dispersal of lysosomes in neurons. Based on multiple lines of experimentation, we conclude that the neuronal Golgi phenotype observed with shRILP is likely off-target in this cell type specifically. Any observed disruptions of endosomal trafficking caused by shRILP in neurons might thus be downstream of Golgi disruption. Different approaches will be needed to test if RILP is required for late endosomal transport in dendrites. Cell type-specific off-target phenotypes therefore likely occur in neurons, making it prudent to re-validate reagents that were previously validated in other cell types.