1
|
Harrison CL, Bahri Khomami M, Enticott J, Thangaratinam S, Rogozińska E, Teede HJ. Key Components of Antenatal Lifestyle Interventions to Optimize Gestational Weight Gain: Secondary Analysis of a Systematic Review. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2318031. [PMID: 37326994 PMCID: PMC10276313 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.18031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Randomized clinical trials have found that antenatal lifestyle interventions optimize gestational weight gain (GWG) and pregnancy outcomes. However, key components of successful interventions for implementation have not been systematically identified. Objective To evaluate intervention components using the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) framework to inform implementation of antenatal lifestyle interventions in routine antenatal care. Data Sources Included studies were drawn from a recently published systematic review on the efficacy of antenatal lifestyle interventions for optimizing GWG. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Health Technology Assessment Database, MEDLINE, and Embase were searched from January 1990 to May 2020. Study Selection Randomized clinical trials examining efficacy of antenatal lifestyle interventions in optimizing GWG were included. Data Extraction and Synthesis Random effects meta-analyses were used to evaluate the association of intervention characteristics with efficacy of antenatal lifestyle interventions in optimizing GWG. The results are reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses reporting guideline. Data extraction was performed by 2 independent reviewers. Main Outcomes and Measures The main outcome was mean GWG. Measures included characteristics of antenatal lifestyle interventions comprising domains related to theoretical framework, material, procedure, facilitator (allied health staff, medical staff, or researcher), delivery format (individual or group), mode, location, gestational age at commencement (<20 wk or ≥20 wk), number of sessions (low [1-5 sessions], moderate [6-20 sessions], and high [≥21 sessions]), duration (low [1-12 wk], moderate [13-20 wk], and high [≥21 wk]), tailoring, attrition, and adherence. For all mean differences (MDs), the reference group was the control group (ie, usual care). Results Overall, 99 studies with 34 546 pregnant individuals were included with differential effective intervention components found according to intervention type. Broadly, interventions delivered by an allied health professional were associated with a greater decrease in GWG compared with those delivered by other facilitators (MD, -1.36 kg; 95% CI, -1.71 to -1.02 kg; P < .001). Compared with corresponding subgroups, dietary interventions with an individual delivery format (MD, -3.91 kg; 95% CI -5.82 to -2.01 kg; P = .002) and moderate number of sessions (MD, -4.35 kg; 95% CI -5.80 to -2.89 kg; P < .001) were associated with the greatest decrease in GWG. Physical activity and mixed behavioral interventions had attenuated associations with GWG. These interventions may benefit from an earlier commencement and a longer duration for more effective optimization of GWG. Conclusions and Relevance These findings suggest that pragmatic research may be needed to test and evaluate effective intervention components to inform implementation of interventions in routine antenatal care for broad public health benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheryce L. Harrison
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Diabetes and Endocrine Unit, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mahnaz Bahri Khomami
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Joanne Enticott
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Shakila Thangaratinam
- World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Global Women’s Health, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Birmingham Women’s and Children’s National Health Service Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Ewelina Rogozińska
- Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, London, United Kingdom
| | - Helena J. Teede
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Diabetes and Endocrine Unit, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rani V, Joshi S. Effectiveness of different behavioral interventions on gestational weight gain, post-partum weight retention and anthropometric measures in pregnancy: A randomized controlled trial. Health Promot Perspect 2022; 12:286-294. [PMID: 36686048 PMCID: PMC9808912 DOI: 10.34172/hpp.2022.37] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2021] [Accepted: 07/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The antenatal and postnatal periods are critical stages in a woman's reproductive life. Many physical changes occur during pregnancy, such as water retention and excessive weight gain. The aim of the present study is to find out the effectiveness of various behavioral interventions during pregnancy to prevent excessive gestational weight gain (GWG) and postpartum weight retention (PPWR). Methods: In this parallel-group randomized controlled trial, 150 pregnant women with singleton pregnancy, aged 20-30 years, body mass index (BMI)≥18.5 kg/m2 and gestational age of less than 16 weeks were randomly allocated into five groups (N=30 in each group): Group A: Control; Group B: Supervised exercise; Group C: Pedometer; Group D: Text message; and Group E: Pedometer plus text message group. Group B received four supervised exercise sessions per month up to delivery; Groups C and E were urged to increase their levels of physical activity, focusing on pedometer-measured step counts of at least 5000-7500 steps per day on seven consecutive days each month. Group E along with group D also received standard SMS messages about physical activity, diet, motivation, and educational-specific topics. Results: The between-group comparisons revealed a statistically significant reduction in PPWR but insignificant difference in GWG. The greatest reduction in PPWR was found in the supervised exercise group (MD=3.25 kg, 95% CI: [1.75, 4.75], P=0.0001 with effect size (η2 )=0.155). Conclusion: The study found that the supervised exercise can be seen as an effective way of improving the physical activity level and reducing excessive PPWR in pregnant women.
Collapse
|
3
|
Barroso CS, Yockey A, Degon E, Poudel PG, Brown SD, Hedderson MM, Moreno-Hunt C, Ehrlich SF. Efficacious lifestyle interventions for appropriate gestational weight gain in women with overweight or obesity set in the health care system: a scoping review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2022; 35:6411-6424. [PMID: 34034608 PMCID: PMC8613304 DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2021.1914576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2020] [Revised: 03/27/2021] [Accepted: 04/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: Health care systems offer opportunities to scale up interventions for appropriate gestational weight gain (GWG); however, GWG interventions in the health care setting remain largely unavailable to women with overweight or obesity. To inform the translation of efficacious lifestyle interventions to health care delivery systems, this scoping review aimed to systematically identify randomized controlled trials for appropriate GWG in women with overweight or obesity that were set in a health care system.Methods: A scoping review allows for the systematic synthesis of knowledge on an exploratory research question aimed at mapping key concepts (e.g. time, location, source, and evidence) and gaps in a specific area of study. The Colquhoun et al. (2014) framework to conducting scoping reviews was used to develop the research question, identify relevant studies, select studies, extract data, and synthesize data. Specifically, two reviewers searched publication databases for English-language articles published from January 2009 to May 2020 using specific keywords/MeSH terms.Results: Eight peer-reviewed journal articles were identified; six trials were based in Europe and two in the U.S. Only four included lifestyle interventions that were efficacious in reducing GWG. Three trials with efficacious interventions were among women with obesity only and encouraged them to gain at or below the lower limit for total GWG (i.e. ≤5 kg) of the Institute of Medicine (IOM) guidelines. The fourth was among women with overweight or obesity and encouraged women to gain within the IOM guidelines with a telehealth behavioral intervention. Efficacious interventions were initiated in the first half of pregnancy and included frequent contact delivered through multiple modalities (i.e. in-person visits, telephone calls, text messages, email) by trained intervention staff (i.e. dietitian, lifestyle coach, and/or physiotherapist). Only one efficacious intervention trial briefly mentioned theoretical components for health promotion (e.g. self-monitoring); likewise, only one included cost-effectiveness analyses.Conclusions: This review systematically identified randomized controlled trials of efficacious lifestyle interventions (i.e. consisting of diet and physical activity components) for appropriate GWG in women with overweight or obesity that were set in the health care system and delivered by non-clinicians. Translation efforts could draw upon aspects of the efficacious lifestyle interventions described in this review. Future studies should examine theory-based telehealth interventions and cost-effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina S. Barroso
- Department of Public Health, the University of Tennessee Knoxville, Knoxville, TN, USA
| | - Andrew Yockey
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA
| | - Emoni Degon
- Department of Public Health, the University of Tennessee Knoxville, Knoxville, TN, USA
| | - Pragya Gautam Poudel
- Department of Public Health, the University of Tennessee Knoxville, Knoxville, TN, USA
| | - Susan D. Brown
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA
| | | | - Carey Moreno-Hunt
- Maternal Fetal Medicine, Kaiser Permanente Roseville Medical Center, Roseville, CA, USA
| | - Samantha F. Ehrlich
- Department of Public Health, the University of Tennessee Knoxville, Knoxville, TN, USA
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bahri Khomami M, Teede HJ, Enticott J, O’Reilly S, Bailey C, Harrison CL. Implementation of Antenatal Lifestyle Interventions Into Routine Care: Secondary Analysis of a Systematic Review. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2234870. [PMID: 36197663 PMCID: PMC9535535 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.34870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Lifestyle interventions in pregnancy optimize gestational weight gain and improve pregnancy outcomes, with implementation recommended by the US Preventive Services Task Force. Yet, implementation research taking these efficacy trials into pragmatic translation remains limited. OBJECTIVE To evaluate success factors for implementing pregnancy lifestyle interventions into antenatal care settings in a meta-analysis, using the penetration, implementation, participation, and effectiveness (PIPE) impact metric. DATA SOURCES Data from a previous systematic review that searched across 9 databases, including MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Health Technology Assessment Database, were obtained, in 2 stages, up to May 6, 2020. STUDY SELECTION Randomized clinical trials reporting gestational weight gain in singleton pregnancies. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS The association of penetration, implementation, and participation with effectiveness of antenatal lifestyle interventions in optimizing gestational weight gain was estimated using random-effects meta-analyses. The Cochrane risk of bias tool, version 1.0, was used to assess risk of bias. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Penetration (reach), implementation (fidelity), participation, and effectiveness of randomized clinical trials of lifestyle interventions in pregnancy. RESULTS Ninety-nine studies with 34 546 participants were included. Only 14 studies reported penetration of target populations. Overall, 38 studies (38.4%) had moderate fidelity, 25 (25.2%) had high fidelity, and 36 (36.4%) had unclear fidelity. Participation was reported in 84 studies (84.8%). Lifestyle interventions were associated with reducing gestational weight gain by 1.15 kg (95% CI, -1.40 to -0.91 kg). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that, despite the large body of evidence on efficacy of lifestyle interventions during pregnancy in optimizing gestational weight gain, little guidance is available to inform implementation of this evidence into practice. There is a need to better elucidate implementation outcomes in trial design alongside pragmatic implementation research to improve the health of women who are pregnant and the next generation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahnaz Bahri Khomami
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Helena J. Teede
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Diabetes and Endocrine Unit, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Joanne Enticott
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sharleen O’Reilly
- UCD Institute of Food and Health, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Cate Bailey
- Health Economics Unit, Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Cheryce L. Harrison
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Diabetes and Endocrine Unit, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Teede HJ, Bailey C, Moran LJ, Bahri Khomami M, Enticott J, Ranasinha S, Rogozinska E, Skouteris H, Boyle JA, Thangaratinam S, Harrison CL. Association of Antenatal Diet and Physical Activity-Based Interventions With Gestational Weight Gain and Pregnancy Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med 2022; 182:106-114. [PMID: 34928300 PMCID: PMC8689430 DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.6373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 99] [Impact Index Per Article: 49.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Excessive gestational weight gain (GWG) is common and associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Antenatal lifestyle interventions limit GWG; yet benefits of different intervention types and specific maternal and neonatal outcomes are unclear. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the association of different types of diet and physical activity-based antenatal lifestyle interventions with GWG and maternal and neonatal outcomes. DATA SOURCES A 2-stage systematic literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Health Technology Assessment Database was conducted from February 1, 2017, to May 31, 2020. Search results from the present study were integrated with those from a previous systematic review from 1990 to February 2017. STUDY SELECTION Randomized trials reporting GWG and maternal and neonatal outcomes. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Data were extracted for random-effects meta-analyses to calculate the summary effect estimates and 95% CIs. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Outcomes were clinically prioritized, with mean GWG as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included gestational diabetes, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, cesarean section, preterm delivery, large or small for gestational age neonates, neonatal intensive care unit admission, or fetal death. RESULTS A total of 117 randomized clinical trials of antenatal lifestyle interventions (involving 34 546 women) were included. Overall lifestyle intervention was associated with reduced GWG (-1.15 kg; 95% CI, -1.40 to -0.91), risk of gestational diabetes (odds ratio [OR], 0.79; 95% CI, 0.70-0.89), and total adverse maternal outcomes (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.84-0.94) vs routine care. Compared with routine care, diet was associated with less GWG (-2.63 kg; 95% CI, -3.87 to -1.40) than physical activity (-1.04 kg; 95% CI, -1.33 to -0.74) or mixed interventions (eg, unstructured lifestyle support, written information with weight monitoring, or behavioral support alone) (-0.74 kg; 95% CI, -1.06 to -0.43). Diet was associated with reduced risk of gestational diabetes (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.45-0.82), preterm delivery (OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.22-0.84), large for gestational age neonate (OR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.08-0.47), neonatal intensive care admission (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.48-0.95), and total adverse maternal (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.61-0.92) and neonatal outcomes (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.26-0.72). Physical activity was associated with reduced GWG and reduced risk of gestational diabetes (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.47-0.75), hypertensive disorders (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.48-0.90), cesarean section (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.75-0.95), and total adverse maternal outcomes (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.71-0.86). Diet with physical activity was associated with reduced GWG (-1.35 kg; 95% CI, -1.95 to -0.75) and reduced risk of gestational diabetes (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.54-0.96) and total adverse maternal outcomes (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.69-0.95). Mixed interventions were associated with reduced GWG only. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This systematic review and meta-analysis found level 1 evidence that antenatal structured diet and physical activity-based lifestyle interventions were associated with reduced GWG and lower risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. The findings support the implementation of such interventions in routine antenatal care and policy around the world.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helena J Teede
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Endocrinology and Diabetes Units, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Warwick Business School, Warwick University, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - Cate Bailey
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lisa J Moran
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Endocrinology and Diabetes Units, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mahnaz Bahri Khomami
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Joanne Enticott
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sanjeeva Ranasinha
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ewelina Rogozinska
- Meta-Analysis Group, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Helen Skouteris
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Warwick Business School, Warwick University, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - Jacqueline A Boyle
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Monash Women's, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Shakila Thangaratinam
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.,Birmingham Women's and Children's National Health Service Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Cheryce L Harrison
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Endocrinology and Diabetes Units, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Vasselli JR, Juray S, Trasino SE. Success and failures of telehealth during COVID-19 should inform digital applications to combat obesity. Obes Sci Pract 2021; 8:254-258. [PMID: 34540264 PMCID: PMC8441632 DOI: 10.1002/osp4.551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2021] [Revised: 07/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth digital applications (apps) permitted the delivery of health care to millions of individuals, including those with poor access to health services. Aim To review a body of evidence demonstrating that telehealth and mobile health (mHealth) apps can promote clinically meaningful weight loss, and thus hold potential to increase access to treatment and weight loss care for individuals suffering from obesity. Results Data from COVID-19 pandemic revealed that access to telehealth and mHealth remains a challenge for underserved communities that are disproportionately affected by obesity. Conclusions The development of telehealth and mHealth for obesity treatment must be informed by the success and failures of telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic. Failure to do so, risks alienating the very populations that stand most to benefit from telehealth and mHealth apps for obesity treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph R Vasselli
- Institute of Human Nutrition Columbia University New York New York USA
| | - Susan Juray
- Nutrition Program School of Urban Public Health Hunter College City University of New York New York New York USA.,Clinical Nutrition Department Mount Sinai New York New York USA
| | - Steven E Trasino
- Nutrition Program School of Urban Public Health Hunter College City University of New York New York New York USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Coughlin JW, Martin LM, Henderson J, Dalcin AT, Fountain J, Wang N, Appel LJ, Clark JM, Bennett W. Feasibility and acceptability of a remotely-delivered behavioural health coaching intervention to limit gestational weight gain. Obes Sci Pract 2020; 6:484-493. [PMID: 33082990 PMCID: PMC7556432 DOI: 10.1002/osp4.438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2019] [Revised: 05/27/2020] [Accepted: 05/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Gestational weight gain (GWG) and postpartum weight retention (PPWR) are significant, potentially modifiable, contributors to women's future weight and health trajectories. There is a need for feasible and patient-centered (i.e., convenient, remotely-delivered, technology-enhanced, and accessible through the prenatal care setting) behavioural interventions that limit GWG and PPWR. This study tests the feasibility and acceptability of a remotely-delivered behavioural health coaching intervention to limit gestational weight gain and postpartum weight retention. METHODS Pregnant women (11-16 weeks gestation) were recruited from two prenatal clinics and randomized to the active intervention or health education comparison group. Completion of the program was monitored and perceived helpfulness was rated (0-100). RESULTS Twenty-six women were randomized (n = 13 per arm; mean age = 31.6 years, SD = 3.6; mean BMI = 26.7 kg/m2, SD = 7.4). Participants completed a median of 18 coaching calls and 16/19 learning activities during pregnancy, and a median of 6 calls and 5/6 learning activities postpartum. They logged weights at least once/week for a median of 36/38 expected weeks and tracked daily calories and exercise for a median of 154/266 days and 72/266 days, respectively. Median (Q1, Q3) helpfulness ratings of the program during pregnancy were 80 (64, 91) and 62 (50, 81) postpartum; helpfulness ratings of coaching calls were 85 (58, 98). At 37 weeks gestation, 77% of participants achieved IOM weight gain recommendations compared to 54% in the comparison group. CONCLUSIONS This study provides evidence for the feasibility and acceptability of a remotely-delivered behavioural weight control intervention in pregnancy and postpartum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. W. Coughlin
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral SciencesJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreMDUSA
- Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical ResearchJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreMDUSA
| | - L. M. Martin
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of MedicineJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreMDUSA
| | - J. Henderson
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreMDUSA
| | - A. T. Dalcin
- Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical ResearchJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreMDUSA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of MedicineJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreMDUSA
| | - J. Fountain
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of MedicineJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreMDUSA
| | - N.‐Y. Wang
- Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical ResearchJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreMDUSA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of MedicineJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreMDUSA
| | - L. J. Appel
- Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical ResearchJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreMDUSA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of MedicineJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreMDUSA
| | - J. M. Clark
- Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical ResearchJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreMDUSA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of MedicineJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreMDUSA
| | - W. Bennett
- Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical ResearchJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreMDUSA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of MedicineJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreMDUSA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Association of the First 1,000 Days Systems-Change Intervention on Maternal Gestational Weight Gain. Obstet Gynecol 2020; 135:1047-1057. [PMID: 32282612 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000003752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the associations of a clinical and public health systems-change intervention on the prevalence of excess gestational weight gain among high-risk, low-income women. METHODS In a quasi-experimental trial, we compared the prevalence of excess gestational weight gain among women before (n=643) and after (n=928) implementation of the First 1,000 Days program in two community health centers in Massachusetts. First 1,000 Days is a systematic program starting in early pregnancy and lasting through the first 24 months of childhood to prevent obesity among mother-child pairs. The program includes enhanced gestational weight gain tracking and counseling, screening for adverse health behaviors and sociocontextual factors, patient navigation and educational materials to support behavior change and social needs, and individualized health coaching for women at high risk for excess gestational weight gain based on their prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) or excess first-trimester weight gain. The primary outcome was gestational weight gain greater than the 2009 Institute of Medicine (now known as the National Academy of Medicine) guidelines according to prepregnancy BMI. RESULTS Among 1,571 women in the analytic sample, mean (SD) age was 30.0 (5.9) years and prepregnancy BMI was 28.1 (6.1); 65.8% of women started pregnancy with BMIs of 25 or higher, and 53.2% were Hispanic. We observed a lower prevalence (55.8-46.4%; unadjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.69, 95% CI 0.49-0.97), similar to results in a multivariable analysis (adjusted OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.49-0.99), of excess gestational weight gain among women with prepregnancy BMIs between 25 and 29.9. Among women who were overweight at the start of pregnancy, the lowest odds of excess gestational weight gain were observed among those with the most interaction with the program's components. Program enrollment was not associated with reduced excess gestational weight gain among women with prepregnancy BMIs of 30 or higher. CONCLUSIONS Implementation of a systems-change intervention was associated with modest reduction in excess gestational weight gain among women who were overweight but not obese at the start of pregnancy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03191591.
Collapse
|
9
|
Batsis JA, McClure AC, Weintraub AB, Kotz DF, Rotenberg S, Cook SB, Gilbert‐Diamond D, Curtis K, Stevens CJ, Sette D, Rothstein RI. Feasibility and acceptability of a rural, pragmatic, telemedicine-delivered healthy lifestyle programme. Obes Sci Pract 2019; 5:521-530. [PMID: 31890242 PMCID: PMC6934425 DOI: 10.1002/osp4.366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2019] [Revised: 08/22/2019] [Accepted: 08/26/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The public health crisis of obesity leads to increasing morbidity that are even more profound in certain populations such as rural adults. Live, two-way video-conferencing is a modality that can potentially surmount geographic barriers and staffing shortages. METHODS Patients from the Dartmouth-Hitchcock Weight and Wellness Center were recruited into a pragmatic, single-arm, nonrandomized study of a remotely delivered 16-week evidence-based healthy lifestyle programme. Patients were provided hardware and appropriate software allowing for remote participation in all sessions, outside of the clinic setting. Our primary outcomes were feasibility and acceptability of the telemedicine intervention, as well as potential effectiveness on anthropometric and functional measures. RESULTS Of 62 participants approached, we enrolled 37, of which 27 completed at least 75% of the 16-week programme sessions (27% attrition). Mean age was 46.9 ± 11.6 years (88.9% female), with a mean body mass index of 41.3 ± 7.1 kg/m2 and mean waist circumference of 120.7 ± 16.8 cm. Mean patient participant satisfaction regarding the telemedicine approach was favourable (4.48 ± 0.58 on 1-5 Likert scale-low to high) and 67.6/75 on standardized questionnaire. Mean weight loss at 16 weeks was 2.22 ± 3.18 kg representing a 2.1% change (P < .001), with a loss in waist circumference of 3.4% (P = .001). Fat mass and visceral fat were significantly lower at 16 weeks (2.9% and 12.5%; both P < .05), with marginal improvement in appendicular skeletal muscle mass (1.7%). In the 30-second sit-to-stand test, a mean improvement of 2.46 stands (P = .005) was observed. CONCLUSION A telemedicine-delivered, intensive weight loss intervention is feasible, acceptable, and potentially effective in rural adults seeking weight loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John A. Batsis
- Section of General Internal MedicineDartmouth‐Hitchcock Medical CenterLebanonNew Hampshire
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth and The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical PracticeLebanonNew Hampshire
- Dartmouth Centers for Health and AgingDartmouth CollegeHanoverNew Hampshire
- Health Promotion Research Center at DartmouthLebanonNew Hampshire
- Section of Weight & Wellness, Department of MedicineDartmouth‐HitchcockLebanonNew Hampshire
| | - Auden C. McClure
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth and The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical PracticeLebanonNew Hampshire
- Section of Weight & Wellness, Department of MedicineDartmouth‐HitchcockLebanonNew Hampshire
- Department of PediatricsDartmouth‐HitchcockLebanonNew Hampshire
| | - Aaron B. Weintraub
- Section of Weight & Wellness, Department of MedicineDartmouth‐HitchcockLebanonNew Hampshire
| | - David F. Kotz
- Department of Computer ScienceDartmouth CollegeHanoverNew Hampshire
| | - Sivan Rotenberg
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth and The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical PracticeLebanonNew Hampshire
- Section of Weight & Wellness, Department of MedicineDartmouth‐HitchcockLebanonNew Hampshire
- Department of PsychiatryDartmouth‐HitchcockLebanonNew Hampshire
| | | | - Diane Gilbert‐Diamond
- Department of EpidemiologyGeisel School of Medicine at DartmouthHanoverNew Hampshire
| | - Kevin Curtis
- Section of Emergency MedicineDartmouth‐HitchcockLebanonNew Hampshire
| | - Courtney J. Stevens
- Dartmouth Centers for Health and AgingDartmouth CollegeHanoverNew Hampshire
- Department of PsychiatryDartmouth‐HitchcockLebanonNew Hampshire
| | - Diane Sette
- Section of Weight & Wellness, Department of MedicineDartmouth‐HitchcockLebanonNew Hampshire
| | - Richard I. Rothstein
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth and The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical PracticeLebanonNew Hampshire
- Section of Weight & Wellness, Department of MedicineDartmouth‐HitchcockLebanonNew Hampshire
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Henriksson P, Sandborg J, Blomberg M, Alexandrou C, Maddison R, Silfvernagel K, Henriksson H, Leppänen MH, Migueles JH, Widman L, Thomas K, Trolle Lagerros Y, Löf M. A Smartphone App to Promote Healthy Weight Gain, Diet, and Physical Activity During Pregnancy (HealthyMoms): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc 2019; 8:e13011. [PMID: 30821695 PMCID: PMC6418485 DOI: 10.2196/13011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2018] [Revised: 01/16/2019] [Accepted: 01/18/2019] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Excessive gestational weight gain is common and associated with adverse outcomes both in the short and long term. Although traditional lifestyle-based interventions have shown to mitigate excess gestational weight gain, little is known about whether mobile Health (mHealth) apps can promote healthy weight gain, diet, and physical activity during pregnancy. Objective The primary aim of the HealthyMoms trial is to determine the effectiveness of a smartphone app (HealthyMoms) for mitigating excess gestational weight gain during pregnancy. Secondary aims are to determine the effectiveness of the app on dietary habits, physical activity, body fatness, and glycemia during pregnancy. Methods HealthyMoms is a two-arm randomized controlled trial. Women are being recruited at routine visits at the maternity clinics in Linköping, Norrköping and Motala, Sweden. Women are randomized to the control or intervention group (n=150 per group). All women will receive standard care, and women in the intervention group will also receive the HealthyMoms smartphone app. Results Recruitment of participants to the trial was initiated in October 2017, and 190 women have so far completed the baseline measurement. The baseline measures are estimated to be finalized in December 2019, and the follow-up measures are estimated to be completed in June 2020. Conclusions This project will evaluate a novel smartphone app intervention integrated with existing maternity health care. If successful, it has great potential to be implemented nationally in order to promote healthy weight gain and health behaviors during pregnancy. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/13011
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pontus Henriksson
- Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden.,Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Johanna Sandborg
- Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden.,Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Marie Blomberg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.,Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Christina Alexandrou
- Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden
| | - Ralph Maddison
- Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia
| | - Kristin Silfvernagel
- Division of Psychology, Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Hanna Henriksson
- Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Marja H Leppänen
- Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden.,Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyvaskyla, Jyvaskyla, Finland
| | - Jairo H Migueles
- Department of Physical and Sports Education, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
| | - Linnea Widman
- Department of Biostatistics, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Kristin Thomas
- Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Ylva Trolle Lagerros
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.,Obesity Center, Academic Specialist Center, Stockholm Health Services, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Marie Löf
- Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden.,Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|