1
|
Two-fraction stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) versus two-fraction high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer: Does dose heterogeneity matter? Radiother Oncol 2022; 169:51-56. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2021] [Revised: 01/28/2022] [Accepted: 02/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
2
|
Overview of the current role of stereotactic body radiotherapy in the treatment of unfavorable intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer. JOURNAL OF RADIOSURGERY AND SBRT 2022; 8:95-103. [PMID: 36275129 PMCID: PMC9489076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2021] [Accepted: 02/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is well accepted for low- and intermediate-favorable risk prostate cancer. Available evidence about the application of SBRT in unfavorable- and high-risk prostate cancer is less solid. During last year's multiple variations in treatment, techniques have been reported making comparisons more complicated. This review's objective is to review current evidence in application of SBRT in intermediate unfavourable and high-risk prostate cancer and to outline variations in SBRT treatment techniques and relevant results.
Collapse
|
3
|
Musunuru HB, Cheung P, Vesprini D, Liu SK, Chu W, Chung HT, Morton G, Deabreu A, Davidson M, Ravi A, Helou J, Ho L, Zhang L, Loblaw A. Gantry-Based 5-Fraction Elective Nodal Irradiation in Unfavorable-Risk Prostate Cancer: Outcomes From 2 Prospective Studies Comparing SABR Boost With MR Dose-Painted HDR Brachytherapy Boost. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 112:735-743. [PMID: 34637882 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2021] [Revised: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 10/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Guidelines from the American Society of Clinical Oncology and Cancer Care Ontario recommend brachytherapy boost for patients with intermediate-risk or high-risk prostate cancer. SABR is an emerging technique for prostate cancer, but its use in high-risk disease is limited. Efficacy, toxic effects, and quality of life (QoL) were compared in patients treated on 2 prospective protocols that used SABR boost or magnetic resonance-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) boost with 6 to 18 months of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). METHODS AND MATERIALS In SATURN study (study 1), patients received 40 Gy to the prostate and 25 Gy to the pelvis in 5 weekly fractions. In SPARE (study 2), patients received HDR-BT (15 Gy × 1) to the prostate and ≤22.5 Gy to the magnetic resonance imaging nodule, followed by 25 Gy in 5 weekly fractions to the pelvis. All patients received between 6 and 18 months of ADT. RESULTS Thirty patients (7% unfavorable intermediate risk and 93% high risk, per National Comprehensive Cancer Network [NCCN] criteria) completed study 1, and 31 patients (3% favorable intermediate risk, 47% unfavorable intermediate risk, and 50% high risk) completed treatment as per study 2. The median follow-up times were 72 and 62 months, respectively. In study 2, 6 patients had biochemical failure, and all 6 developed metastatic disease. Actuarial 5-year biochemical failure was 0% for study 1 and 18.2% for study 2 (P = .005). There was no significant difference in the worst acute or late gastrointestinal or genitourinary toxicity. Grade 3 late genitourinary toxicity was noted in 3% of the patients in study 2 (HDR-BT boost). There was either no significant difference or minimal clinically important change in QoL. CONCLUSIONS In the context of 5-fraction pelvic radiation therapy and ADT, there did not appear to be a significant difference in toxicity or QoL between SABR and HDR-BT boost. Although efficacy favored the SABR boost cohort, this should be viewed in the context of limitations and biases associated with comparing 2 sequential phase 2 studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hima Bindu Musunuru
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Patrick Cheung
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Danny Vesprini
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Stanley K Liu
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - William Chu
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Hans T Chung
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Gerard Morton
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Andrea Deabreu
- Clinical Trials and Epidemiology Program, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Melanie Davidson
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Ananth Ravi
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Joelle Helou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Ling Ho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Liying Zhang
- Clinical Trials and Epidemiology Program, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Andrew Loblaw
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Toronto, Ontario.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Foerster R, Zwahlen DR, Buchali A, Tang H, Schroeder C, Windisch P, Vu E, Akbaba S, Bostel T, Sprave T, Zamboglou C, Zilli T, Stelmes JJ, Telkhade T, Murthy V. Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13040759. [PMID: 33673077 PMCID: PMC7918664 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13040759] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2020] [Revised: 02/04/2021] [Accepted: 02/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiotherapy (RT) is an established, potentially curative treatment option for all risk constellations of localized prostate cancer (PCA). Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and dose-escalated RT can further improve outcome in high-risk (HR) PCA. In recent years, shorter RT schedules based on hypofractionated RT have shown equal outcome. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a highly conformal RT technique enabling ultra-hypofractionation which has been shown to be safe and efficient in patients with low- and intermediate-risk PCA. There is a paucity of data on the role of SBRT in HR PCA. In particular, the need for pelvic elective nodal irradiation (ENI) needs to be addressed. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review to analyze the available data on observed toxicities, ADT prescription practice, and oncological outcome to shed more light on the value of SBRT in HR PCA. METHODS We searched the PubMed and Embase electronic databases for the terms "prostate cancer" AND "stereotactic" AND "radiotherapy" in June 2020. We adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations. RESULTS After a rigorous selection process, we identified 18 individual studies meeting all selection criteria for further analyses. Five additional studies were included because their content was judged as relevant. Three trials have reported on prostate SBRT including pelvic nodes; 2 with ENI and 1 with positive pelvic nodes only. The remaining studies investigated SBRT of the prostate only. Grade 2+ acute genitourinary (GU) toxicity was between 12% and 46.7% in the studies investigating pelvic nodes irradiation and ranged from 0% to 89% in the prostate only studies. Grade 2+ chronic GU toxicity was between 7% and 60% vs. 2% and 56.7%. Acute gastrointestinal (GI) grade 2+ toxicity was between 0% to 4% and 0% to 18% for studies with and without pelvic nodes irradiation, respectively. Chronic GI grade 2+ toxicity rates were between 4% and 50.1% vs. 0% and 40%. SBRT of prostate and positive pelvic nodes only showed similar toxicity rates as SBRT for the prostate only. Among the trials that reported on ADT use, the majority of HR PCA patients underwent ADT for at least 2 months; mostly neoadjuvant and concurrent. Biochemical control rates ranged from 82% to 100% after 2 years and 56% to 100% after 3 years. Only a few studies reported longer follow-up data. CONCLUSION At this point, SBRT with or without pelvic ENI cannot be considered the standard of care in HR PCA, due to missing level 1 evidence. Treatment may be offered to selected patients at specialized centers with access to high-precision RT. While concomitant ADT is the current standard of care, the necessary duration of ADT in combination with SBRT remains unclear. Ideally, all eligible patients should be enrolled in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Foerster
- Institute for Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur (KSW), 8401 Winterthur, Switzerland; (D.R.Z.); (H.T.); (C.S.); (P.W.)
- Medical Faculty, University of Zurich (UZH), 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +41-52-266-31-40
| | - Daniel Rudolf Zwahlen
- Institute for Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur (KSW), 8401 Winterthur, Switzerland; (D.R.Z.); (H.T.); (C.S.); (P.W.)
- Medical Faculty, University of Zurich (UZH), 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Andre Buchali
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruppiner Kliniken GmbH, Brandenburg Medical School (MHB), 16816 Neuruppin, Germany;
| | - Hongjian Tang
- Institute for Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur (KSW), 8401 Winterthur, Switzerland; (D.R.Z.); (H.T.); (C.S.); (P.W.)
| | - Christina Schroeder
- Institute for Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur (KSW), 8401 Winterthur, Switzerland; (D.R.Z.); (H.T.); (C.S.); (P.W.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruppiner Kliniken GmbH, Brandenburg Medical School (MHB), 16816 Neuruppin, Germany;
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), ETH Domain, 5232 Villingen, Switzerland
| | - Paul Windisch
- Institute for Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur (KSW), 8401 Winterthur, Switzerland; (D.R.Z.); (H.T.); (C.S.); (P.W.)
| | - Erwin Vu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen (KSSG), 9007 St. Gallen, Switzerland;
| | - Sati Akbaba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany; (S.A.); (T.B.)
| | - Tilman Bostel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany; (S.A.); (T.B.)
| | - Tanja Sprave
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany; (T.S.); (C.Z.)
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany; (T.S.); (C.Z.)
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Geneva (HUG), 1205 Geneva, Switzerland;
| | - Jean-Jacques Stelmes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Oncological Institute of Southern Switzerland (IOSI), Cantonal Hospitals (EOC), 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland;
| | - Tejshri Telkhade
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital and Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai 400012, India; (T.T.); (V.M.)
| | - Vedang Murthy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital and Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai 400012, India; (T.T.); (V.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Grégoire V, Guckenberger M, Haustermans K, Lagendijk JJW, Ménard C, Pötter R, Slotman BJ, Tanderup K, Thorwarth D, van Herk M, Zips D. Image guidance in radiation therapy for better cure of cancer. Mol Oncol 2020; 14:1470-1491. [PMID: 32536001 PMCID: PMC7332209 DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.12751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2020] [Revised: 06/08/2020] [Accepted: 06/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
The key goal and main challenge of radiation therapy is the elimination of tumors without any concurring damages of the surrounding healthy tissues and organs. Radiation doses required to achieve sufficient cancer-cell kill exceed in most clinical situations the dose that can be tolerated by the healthy tissues, especially when large parts of the affected organ are irradiated. High-precision radiation oncology aims at optimizing tumor coverage, while sparing normal tissues. Medical imaging during the preparation phase, as well as in the treatment room for localization of the tumor and directing the beam, referred to as image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT), is the cornerstone of precision radiation oncology. Sophisticated high-resolution real-time IGRT using X-rays, computer tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, or ultrasound, enables delivery of high radiation doses to tumors without significant damage of healthy organs. IGRT is the most convincing success story of radiation oncology over the last decades, and it remains a major driving force of innovation, contributing to the development of personalized oncology, for example, through the use of real-time imaging biomarkers for individualized dose delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent Grégoire
- Department of Radiation OncologyLéon Bérard Cancer CenterLyonFrance
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department for Radiation OncologyUniversity Hospital ZurichUniversity of ZurichSwitzerland
| | - Karin Haustermans
- Department of Radiation OncologyLeuven Cancer InstituteUniversity Hospital GasthuisbergLeuvenBelgium
| | | | | | - Richard Pötter
- Department of Radiation OncologyMedical UniversityGeneral Hospital of ViennaAustria
| | - Ben J. Slotman
- Department of Radiation OncologyAmsterdam University Medical CentersThe Netherlands
| | - Kari Tanderup
- Department of OncologyAarhus University HospitalDenmark
| | - Daniela Thorwarth
- Section for Biomedical PhysicsDepartment of Radiation OncologyUniversity of TübingenGermany
| | - Marcel van Herk
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and PhysicsCancer Center AmsterdamAmsterdam UMCUniversity of AmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Institute of Cancer SciencesUniversity of ManchesterUK
- Department of Radiotherapy Related ResearchThe Christie NHS Foundation TrustManchesterUK
| | - Daniel Zips
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of TübingenGermany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Nathoo D, Loblaw A, Davidson M, Musunuru HB, Khojaste A, Ravi A. A Feasibility Study on the Role of Ultrasound Imaging of Bladder Volume as a Method to Improve Concordance of Bladder Filling Status on Treatment with Simulation. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 2018; 49:277-285. [PMID: 32074054 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2018.04.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2017] [Revised: 04/12/2018] [Accepted: 04/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Accurate positioning of the prostate is of paramount importance to ensure optimal target coverage and normal tissue sparing in stereotactic ablative body radiation when large doses per fraction are delivered with tight margins around the prostate. Bladder and rectal filling play an important part in controlling the accuracy of a patient's setup and therefore the overall toxicities and outcomes. The aim of this study was to establish the value of characterizing patients' bladder filling kinetics at the time of simulation with ultrasound scans so that a predictive model can be used to ensure that a bladder volume at treatment would match at simulation. METHODS A prospective trial was conducted in unfavorable risk prostate cancer patients to evaluate the utility of ultrasound bladder monitoring. Thirty patients (n = 30) were enrolled in this study. Patients were required to void before simulation and then were given 500 mL of fluids to drink. Ultrasound measurements of the bladder were documented at 15-minute intervals for up to four measurements before simulation. On treatment, bladder volumes were measured at a single time point; typically, half an hour after the patient voided and consumed 500 mL of fluids. The kinetic model was then used to predict the optimal time to set up the patient for treatment such that the bladder volume at treatment would match the volume at simulation. Every patient had a cone beam computed tomography scan before each fraction to ensure accurate patient positioning before dose delivery. Bladder volumes at treatment were measured and compared with those at simulation on the cone beam computed tomography data sets using MIMVISTA software. RESULTS Of 30 patients, 26 were analyzed. The comparison of the bladder contours at treatment compared to simulation yielded a DICE coefficient (similarity) of 0.76 ± 0.11. The largest variation in bladder size was seen in the anterior-posterior direction. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated that ultrasound monitoring of the bladder status was a valuable tool in ensuring reproducible bladder filling on treatment. The bladder kinetic model indicated the general time required to achieve optimal bladder filling was 60 minutes after voiding and drinking 500 mL of water.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dilshad Nathoo
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrew Loblaw
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Melanie Davidson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medical Physics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hima Bindu Musunuru
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Amir Khojaste
- Department of Medical Physics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ananth Ravi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medical Physics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Musunuru HB, D'Alimonte L, Davidson M, Ho L, Cheung P, Vesprini D, Liu S, Chu W, Chung H, Ravi A, Deabreu A, Zhang L, Commisso K, Loblaw A. Phase 1-2 Study of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy Including Regional Lymph Node Irradiation in Patients With High-Risk Prostate Cancer (SATURN): Early Toxicity and Quality of Life. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; 102:1438-1447. [PMID: 30071295 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.07.2005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2018] [Revised: 07/02/2018] [Accepted: 07/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Five-fraction stereotactic ablative radiation therapy appears to be gaining popularity in treatment of prostate cancer, but it has not been extensively tested in the context of pelvic radiation. The objective of this prospective prostate and pelvic SABR study is to report the acute toxicity, late toxicity, and quality of life (QoL) after study completion. METHODS AND MATERIALS A phase 1/2 study was conducted for patients with high-risk prostate cancer. Radiation therapy was planned to deliver 25 Gy to pelvis and seminal vesicles (SV) and a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) of up to 40 Gy to the prostate in 5 fractions, weekly, over 29 days. Androgen deprivation therapy was used for 12 to 18 months. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0 was used to assess worst acute and late toxicities. QoL data was captured using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite questionnaire (EPIC). RESULTS Thirty patients completed the planned treatment with a median follow-up of 25.7 months (range, 18.5-30.7 months). The following "worst" acute and late toxicities were observed: grade 2 genitourinary toxicity, 46.7% and 52%, respectively; grade 2 gastrointestinal toxicity, 3.3% and 32%, respectively. No grade 3 or higher toxicities were noted. Mean (95% confidence interval) EPIC urinary QoL scores were 86.6 (81.9-91.3), 87.1 (81.4-92.6), and 87.9 (80.1-95.7) at baseline, 3 months and 24 months; bowel scores were 94.1 (91.3-97.0), 93.2 (89.1-97.2), and 92.4 (87.7- 97.1), respectively. CONCLUSIONS This gantry-based novel fractionation schedule incorporating pelvic radiation for high-risk prostate cancer in combination with androgen deprivation therapy is feasible and well tolerated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Laura D'Alimonte
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Melanie Davidson
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ling Ho
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Patrick Cheung
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Daniel Vesprini
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stanley Liu
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - William Chu
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hans Chung
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ananth Ravi
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrea Deabreu
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Liying Zhang
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kristina Commisso
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrew Loblaw
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Health Policy, Measurement and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Holmes OE, Gratton J, Szanto J, Vandervoort E, Doody J, Henderson E, Morgan SC, O'Sullivan J, Malone S. Reducing errors in prostate tracking with an improved fiducial implantation protocol for CyberKnife based stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). JOURNAL OF RADIOSURGERY AND SBRT 2018; 5:217-227. [PMID: 29988326 PMCID: PMC6018049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2017] [Accepted: 03/27/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy with SBRT is an established technique for treating localized prostate cancer. CyberKnife based SBRT requires implantation of fiducial markers for soft tissue target tracking by the orthogonal KV X-ray imaging system. The spatial distribution of fiducial markers must allow accurate calculation of a 3D transformation that describes the position of the prostate within the reference frame of the planning CT scan. Accuray provides a fiducial implantation guideline for tracking soft tissue lesions. Despite using the guideline we experienced an unacceptably high rate of rotational tracking failure due to problems with fiducial placement. We adapted the Accuray guideline to prostate SBRT for improved fiducial placement and more reliable target tracking.Methods and materials: 54 patients with prostate adenocarcinoma were treated with ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy on CyberKnife. Patients had platinum fiducial markers implanted transrectally under ultrasound guidance by a Radiologist. For the first 26 patients, fiducial markers were positioned following the Accuray fiducial placement guidelines for soft tissue lesions (cohort 1). The initial rotational tracking error rate was unacceptably high (23%). On review, inappropriate fiducial placement was identified as the cause of error (especially insufficient spacing between seeds). In October 2016 we developed a seed placement protocol specifically for implanting fiducial markers within the prostate and a second cohort of patients was treated thereafter (cohort 2, 28 patients). The stipulations of the original guideline are maintained while the modified protocol requires that 4 fiducial markers be implanted in the postero-lateral peripheral zone in a single coronal plane. RESULTS In cohort 1, patients had a median age of 64 years (50 - 74), PSA of 6.6mcg/L (1.1 - 14.7), and prostate volume of 56 cc (22 - 125), while in cohort 2 they had a mean age of 65 years (53 - 75), PSA of 6.2 mcg/L (1 - 12) and prostate volume of 47 cc (21 - 106). The fiducial markers were easily visualized and there were no cases of urosepsis related to fiducial implantation. In 6 of 26 patients (23%) from cohort 1, only translational mapping without accurate spatial rotations could be calculated. After adopting the prostate specific fiducial implantation protocol, rotational tracking error was eliminated. Accurate 6 degree tracking (accounting for translations and rotations) was achieved in all 28 patients from cohort 2. Using an in-house computer script we analyzed the dose distributions resulting from rotational misalignments of -10, -5, -3, 3, 5, and 10 degrees along all three rotational axes (pitch, roll and yaw). Rotational misalignments result in decreased minimum dose to the PTV and increased maximum dose to OARs. CONCLUSION Implementing a prostate specific fiducial placement protocol for SBRT significantly improved our ability to track prostate motion in 6 degrees 77% to 100% reliability. Failure to track rotations can potentially lead to underdosing and overdosing of portions of the prostate and OARs respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver E Holmes
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Dr. H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Centre, St. John's NL, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's NL, Canada
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Ottawa, Ottawa ON, Canada
| | | | - Janos Szanto
- Department of Medical Physics, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa ON, Canada
| | - Eric Vandervoort
- Department of Medical Physics, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa ON, Canada
| | - Janice Doody
- Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa ON, Canada
| | - Elizabeth Henderson
- Department of Medical Physics, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa ON, Canada
| | - Scott C Morgan
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Ottawa, Ottawa ON, Canada
- Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa ON, Canada
| | - Joseph O'Sullivan
- Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa ON, Canada
- Department of Radiology, The University of Ottawa, Ottawa ON, Canada
| | - Shawn Malone
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Ottawa, Ottawa ON, Canada
- Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Helou J, Torres S, Musunuru HB, Raphael J, Cheung P, Vesprini D, Chung HT, D'Alimonte L, Krahn M, Morton G, Loblaw A. Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy versus Low Dose Rate Brachytherapy for Localised Prostate Cancer: a Cost-Utility Analysis. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2017; 29:718-731. [PMID: 28916284 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2017.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2017] [Revised: 07/23/2017] [Accepted: 07/24/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To conduct a cost-utility analysis comparing stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) with low dose rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) for localised prostate cancer (PCa). MATERIALS AND METHODS A decision-analytic Markov model was developed from the healthcare payer perspective to simulate the history of a 66-year-old man with low-risk PCa. The model followed patients yearly over their remaining lifetimes. Health states included 'recurrence-free', 'biochemical recurrence' (BR), 'metastatic' and 'death'. Transition probabilities were based on a retrospective cohort analysis undertaken at our institution. Utilities were derived from the literature. Costs were assigned in 2015 Canadian dollars ($) and reflected Ontario's health system and departmental costs. Outcomes included quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. A willingness-to-pay threshold of $50 000/QALY was used. RESULTS SBRT was the dominant strategy with 0.008LYs and 0.029QALYs gained and a reduction in cost of $2615. Under base case conditions, our results were sensitive to the BR probability associated with both strategies. LDR-BT becomes the preferred strategy if the BR with SBRT is 1.3*[baseline BR_SBRT] or if the BR with LDR-BT is 0.76*[baseline BR_LDR-BT]. When assuming the same BR for both strategies, LDR-BT becomes marginally more effective with 0.009QALYs gained at a cost of $272 848/QALY. CONCLUSIONS SBRT represents an economically attractive radiation strategy. Further research should be carried out to provide longer-term follow-up and high-quality evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Helou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Measurement and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| | - S Torres
- Institute of Health Policy, Measurement and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - H B Musunuru
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - J Raphael
- Institute of Health Policy, Measurement and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - P Cheung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - D Vesprini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - H T Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - L D'Alimonte
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - M Krahn
- Institute of Health Policy, Measurement and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment Collaborative, Toronto, Canada
| | - G Morton
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - A Loblaw
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Measurement and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kim M, Craft DL. Within the next five years, most radiotherapy treatment schedules will be designed using spatiotemporal optimization. Med Phys 2017; 43:2009. [PMID: 27147312 DOI: 10.1118/1.4943383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Minsun Kim
- Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195-6043 (Tel: 206-598-8133; E-mail: )
| | - David L Craft
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114 (Tel: 617-724-9528; E-mail: )
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Androgen Suppression Combined with Elective Nodal and Dose Escalated Radiation Therapy (the ASCENDE-RT Trial): An Analysis of Survival Endpoints for a Randomized Trial Comparing a Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy Boost to a Dose-Escalated External Beam Boost for High- and Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2016; 98:275-285. [PMID: 28262473 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.11.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 551] [Impact Index Per Article: 68.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2016] [Revised: 11/12/2016] [Accepted: 11/16/2016] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To report the primary endpoint of biochemical progression-free survival (b-PFS) and secondary survival endpoints from ASCENDE-RT, a randomized trial comparing 2 methods of dose escalation for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS ASCENDE-RT enrolled 398 men, with a median age of 68 years; 69% (n=276) had high-risk disease. After stratification by risk group, the subjects were randomized to a standard arm with 12 months of androgen deprivation therapy, pelvic irradiation to 46 Gy, followed by a dose-escalated external beam radiation therapy (DE-EBRT) boost to 78 Gy, or an experimental arm that substituted a low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy (LDR-PB) boost. Of the 398 trial subjects, 200 were assigned to DE-EBRT boost and 198 to LDR-PB boost. The median follow-up was 6.5 years. RESULTS In an intent-to-treat analysis, men randomized to DE-EBRT were twice as likely to experience biochemical failure (multivariable analysis [MVA] hazard ratio [HR] 2.04; P=.004). The 5-, 7-, and 9-year Kaplan-Meier b-PFS estimates were 89%, 86%, and 83% for the LDR-PB boost versus 84%, 75%, and 62% for the DE-EBRT boost (log-rank P<.001). The LDR-PB boost benefited both intermediate- and high-risk patients. Because the b-PFS curves for the treatment arms diverge sharply after 4 years, the relative advantage of the LDR-PB should increase with longer follow-up. On MVA, the only variables correlated with reduced overall survival were age (MVA HR 1.06/y; P=.004) and biochemical failure (MVA HR 6.30; P<.001). Although biochemical failure was associated with increased mortality and randomization to DE-EBRT doubled the rate of biochemical failure, no significant overall survival difference was observed between the treatment arms (MVA HR 1.13; P=.62). CONCLUSIONS Compared with 78 Gy EBRT, men randomized to the LDR-PB boost were twice as likely to be free of biochemical failure at a median follow-up of 6.5 years.
Collapse
|
12
|
Musunuru HB, Davidson M, Cheung P, Vesprini D, Liu S, Chung H, Chu W, Mamedov A, Ravi A, D'Alimonte L, Commisso K, Helou J, Deabreu A, Zhang L, Loblaw A. Predictive Parameters of Symptomatic Hematochezia Following 5-Fraction Gantry-Based SABR in Prostate Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2016; 94:1043-51. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2015] [Revised: 12/07/2015] [Accepted: 12/09/2015] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
13
|
Lo SS, Slotman BJ, Lock M, Nagata Y, Guckenberger M, Siva S, Foote M, Tan D, Teh BS, Mayr NA, Chang EL, Timmerman RD, Sahgal A. The development of stereotactic body radiotherapy in the past decade: a global perspective. Future Oncol 2015; 11:2721-2733. [PMID: 26338676 DOI: 10.2217/fon.15.220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
In the past 10 years, there has been an exponential increase in the incorporation of stereotactic body radiotherapy, also known as stereotactic ablative radiotherapy, into the armamentarium against various types of cancer in different settings worldwide. In this article in the 10th year anniversary issue of Future Oncology, representatives from the USA, Canada, Japan, Germany, The Netherlands, Australia and Singapore will provide individual perspectives of the development of stereotactic body radiotherapy in their respective countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon S Lo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Ben J Slotman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michael Lock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, London Regional Cancer Program, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - Yasushi Nagata
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | | | - Shankar Siva
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Matthew Foote
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia
| | - Daniel Tan
- Asian American Radiation Oncology, Singapore
| | - Bin S Teh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Weill Cornell Medical College, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Nina A Mayr
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Eric L Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Keck School of Medicine & Norris Cancer Center at the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Robert D Timmerman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Oligometastatic Disease. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2015; 27:290-7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2015.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2015] [Revised: 01/14/2015] [Accepted: 02/05/2015] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
|