Effectiveness and Safety of Pyrotinib, and Association of Biomarker With Progression-Free Survival in Patients With HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Real-World, Multicentre Analysis

Long-term Outcome Analysis of Pyrotinib in Patients With HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer and Brain Metastasis: A Real-World Study

BACKGROUND

Pyrotinib is currently approved for the treatment of HER2-positive advanced breast cancer in China. Data on the overall survival (OS) and efficacy in patients with brain metastasis (BM) remain scarce. This study evaluated the effectiveness of pyrotinib in a real-world setting, especially in patients with BM.

METHODS

We reviewed patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with pyrotinib-based therapy between June 2018 and June 2022. Progression-free survival (PFS), OS, objective response rate, and safety were analyzed following the administration of pyrotinib.

RESULTS

A total of 239 patients were included. The median PFS in patients who received pyrotinib-based therapy as first-line (15/239), second-line (115/239), or third-or-higher-line (109/239) treatment was 14.00, 9.33, and 8.20 months, respectively, and the median OS was not reached, 29.07 and 22.23 months, respectively. The median PFS in patients who pretreated with trastuzumab (214/239), trastuzumab plus pertuzumab (22/239), lapatinib (68/239), or trastuzumab emtansine (14/239) was 9.33, 6.87, 7.20, and 7.20 months, respectively. In 61 patients with BM, the median PFS was 7.50 months, the median central nervous system (CNS)-PFS was 11.17 months, and the median OS was 21.27 months. Furthermore, 19 patients with concomitant brain radiotherapy tended to achieve a longer OS than 42 patients without radiation (34.17 vs. 20.70 months, P = .112).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term outcomes of pyrotinib-based therapy are promising for patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer in real world and in patients with BM, regardless of the treatment lines and prior anti-HER2 therapies.

Understanding the mechanistic pathways and clinical aspects associated with protein and gene based biomarkers in breast cancer

Cancer is one of the most widespread and severe diseases with a huge mortality rate. In recent years, the second-leading mortality rate of any cancer globally has been breast cancer, which is one of the most common and deadly cancers found in women. Detecting breast cancer in its initial stages simplifies treatment, decreases death risk, and recovers survival rates for patients. The death rate for breast cancer has risen to 0.024 % in some regions. Sensitive and accurate technologies are required for the preclinical detection of BC at an initial stage. Biomarkers play a very crucial role in the early identification as well as diagnosis of women with breast cancer. Currently, a wide variety of cancer biomarkers have been discovered for the diagnosis of cancer. For the identification of these biomarkers from serum or other body fluids at physiological amounts, many detection methods have been developed. In the case of breast cancer, biomarkers are especially helpful in discovering those who are more likely to develop the disease, determining prognosis at the time of initial diagnosis and choosing the best systemic therapy. In this study we have compiled various clinical aspects and signaling pathways associated with protein-based biomarkers and gene-based biomarkers.

Comparing pyrotinib with trastuzumab and pertuzumab with trastuzumab for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: a retrospective, multicenter analysis

Objective

Pyrotinib and pertuzumab are effective treatment options for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (HER2+ MBC). Our study was to directly compare the efficacy and safety of pyrotinib plus trastuzumab (PyroH) and pertuzumab plus trastuzumab (HP) in patients with HER2+ MBC.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective examination of HER2+ MBC patients who received PyroH plus chemotherapy or HP plus chemotherapy between 2017 and 2022 at five institutions in China. Our primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

This study involved 333 patients, among which 161 received PyroH and 172 received HP. The utilization of PyroH as a first-line therapy for MBC was more prevalent among older patients, those with a shorter duration of disease-free interval, or those who had previously been treated with trastuzumab. Although in the first-line advanced treatment HP cohort showed numerically longer PFS (median PFS: 14.46 vs. 22.90 months, p=0.057), in the second-line or later treatments, there was no significant difference in PFS between the PyroH and HP groups (median PFS: 8.67 vs. 7.92 months, p=0.286). Despite HP showing a longer PFS in the overall cohort (median PFS: 9.30 vs. 13.01 months, p=0.005), it did not serve as an independent predictor of PFS in the multivariate analysis (HR 1.134, 95% CI 0.710-1.811, p=0.598). Without taxane, PyroH demonstrated a longer PFS than HP (median PFS: 10.12 vs. 8.15 months, p=0.017). PyroH group displayed a numerically longer median PFS in patients with brain metastases compared to the HP group, though not statistically significant (median PFS: 9.03 vs. 8.15 months, p=0.976). PyroH had higher incidence of grade 3/4 diarrhea (34.3% vs. 3.0%) but similar overall adverse events.

Conclusion

In conclusion, PyroH is comparable in second-line or later treatment and during brain metastasis, even having superior efficacy without taxane in real-world setting. Toxicities were tolerable in both groups. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05572645).

Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes of pyrotinib-based therapy in patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer (PRETTY): A nationwide, prospective, observational study

Pyrotinib, an irreversible pan-ErbB inhibitor, has been approved for treating HER2-positive advanced breast cancer in China. We conducted a nationwide, prospective observational study to examine the real-world data of pyrotinib-based therapy in this population. Patients from 61 sites across China were included. Pyrotinib-based regimens were prescribed at local physician's discretion. Demographics, treatment patterns, prognosis and safety were evaluated. The primary outcome was real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS). Of 1129 patients, pyrotinib-based therapy was prescribed as first-, second- and third- or later-line treatment in 437 (38.7%), 476 (42.2%) and 216 (19.1%) patients, respectively. Median rwPFS (mrwPFS) was 14.3 (95% CI, 13.3-15.2) months in the total population, with the longest mrwPFS of 17.8 (95% CI, 15.2-24.9) months in the first-line setting, followed by 14.4 (95% CI, 12.9-15.3) months in the second-line setting. Patients with third- or later-line treatment also achieved a mrwPFS of 9.3 (95% CI, 8.4-11.8) months. Patients with trastuzumab- or trastuzumab-pertuzumab-treated disease achieved a mrwPFS of 14.3 and 13.6 months, respectively. Dual HER2 blockade with pyrotinib plus trastuzumab showed a mrwPFS of 16.2 months in the total population, with data not mature in the first-line setting. For patients with baseline brain metastases, the mrwPFS was 11.7 months. The most common adverse event was diarrhea (any grade, 73.5%; grade ≥ 3, 15.3%). In real world, pyrotinib-based therapy shows promising effectiveness in the first-, as well as second- and later-line treatment, with acceptable tolerability. Further investigations regarding front-line use or novel combinations of pyrotinib might facilitate to maximize its anti-tumor potential.

Association between platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and outcomes in HER2-positive advanced breast cancer patients treated with pyrotinib: a retrospective study

Background

Peripheral blood biomarkers have been reported to be associated with the prognosis of breast cancer (BC) patients, but a few findings remain controversial. This study aimed to explore the correlation between peripheral blood indicators and treatment outcomes in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive advanced BC patients treated with pyrotinib.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study including 156 HER2-positive advanced BC patients who treated with pyrotinib between March 2019 and May 2021. The baseline clinical characteristics including age, hormone receptor (HR) status, Ki-67, sites of metastasis, antitumor therapies and peripheral blood parameters including neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte to lymphocyte ratio (MLR), the product of neutrophil, platelet, and monocyte counts divided by lymphocyte count [pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV)] were collected. Tumor response was assessed every two cycles during treatment period. Follow-up was performed every 2 months to record survival status. All patients were followed up until death or time of data lock.

Results

Low PLR was associated with better disease control rate (P=0.005). Univariate analysis showed that high MLR (P=0.004), PLR (P=0.003), or PIV (P=0.02), low lymphocyte count (P=0.025), more than two metastatic sites (P<0.001), and presence of liver metastasis (P<0.001) or brain metastasis (P<0.001) were associated with poor progression-free survival (PFS). Multivariate analysis showed that only high PLR was an independent factor for poor PFS [hazard ratio =0.63; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.41-0.97; P=0.038]. For overall survival (OS), univariate analysis showed that high NLR (P=0.001), MLR (P=0.005), PLR (P<0.001), or PIV (P=0.018), more than two metastatic sites (P=0.001), presence of liver metastasis (P=0.004) or brain metastasis (P=0.007), and pyrotinib monotherapy (P=0.036) were associated with worse OS. Multivariate analysis showed that PLR (hazard ratio =0.37; 95% CI: 0.14-0.94; P=0.037), number of metastatic sites (hazard ratio =2.84; 95% CI: 1.02-7.94; P=0.046) and treatment regimens (hazard ratio =0.15; 95% CI: 0.03-0.73; P=0.019) were independent factors.

Conclusions

High PLR is associated with poor treatment response and is an independent unfavorable prognostic factor in HER2-positive advanced BC patients treated with pyrotinib. The findings herein indicate that patients with higher PLR are less likely to benefit from pyrotinib-based therapy and may be helpful in identifying the effective population in clinical practice.

​Efficacy and safety of pyrotinib in combination with albumin‑bound paclitaxel for the treatment of HER2‑positive advanced breast cancer: A real‑world study

The present study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of pyrotinib in combination with albumin-bound paclitaxel in patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer (ABC). A total of 48 patients diagnosed with HER2-positive ABC were included in the present study, and these patients were prescribed a combination of pyrotinib and albumin-bound paclitaxel in routine clinical practice. During a 21-day cycle, the standard dosage of pyrotinib was 400 mg single dose/day, which was administered orally, and 130 mg/m²/day albumin-bound paclitaxel on days 1, 8 and 15, which was administered by intravenous drip. The primary efficacy endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) and the secondary efficacy endpoint was overall response rate (ORR), which was defined as the percentage of patients with complete remission or partial remission. Safety indicators were also observed in the present study. The results of the present study demonstrated that the median PFS (mPFS) was 8.1 months for all patients, ranging from 3.3-10.6 months. Patients receiving pyrotinib as second-line therapy exhibited a longer mPFS of 8.5 months compared with those receiving it as third- or higher-line therapy (mPFS, 5.9 months). In 17 patients with brain metastases, mPFS was 7.3 months, ranging from 4.8-10.1 months. The results of the present study also demonstrated that the ORR for the 48 patients was 33.3%. Notably, diarrhea was the most common grade 3-4 adverse event, occurring in 22.9% of patients, followed by neutropenia (6.3%), leukopenia (4.2%) and anemia (4.2%). Collectively, the results of the present study indicated that pyrotinib-based treatment is effective for patients with HER2⁺ ABC, including those who have previously been treated with trastuzumab. Thus, the combination of pyrotinib with albumin-bound paclitaxel is recommended due to high levels of efficacy, convenience and tolerability.

Efficacy and safety of inetetamab-containing regimens in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: a real-world retrospective study in China

Background

Inetetamab (cipterbin) is an innovative anti-HER2 humanized monoclonal antibody. The efficacy and safety of a combination of inetetamab and vinorelbine in the first-line treatment of human epidermal receptor positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) have been confirmed. We aimed to investigate real-world data of inetetamab in complex clinical practice.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who received inetetamab as a salvage treatment at any line setting from July 2020 to June 2022. The main endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

A total of 64 patients were included in this analysis. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 5.6 (4.6-6.6) months. Of the patients, 62.5% received two or more lines of therapy before treatment with inetetamab. The most common chemotherapy and anti-HER2 regimens combined with inetetamab were vinorelbine (60.9%) and pyrotinib (62.5%), respectively. Patients treated with inetetamab plus pyrotinib plus vinorelbine benefited the most (p=0.048), with the mPFS of 9.3 (3.1-15.5) months and an objective response rate of 35.5%. For patients with pyrotinib pretreatment, inetetamab plus vinorelbine plus pyrotinib agents resulted in mPFS of 10.3 (5.2-15.4) months. Regimens (inetetamab plus vinorelbine plus pyrotinib vs. other therapeutic agents) and visceral metastases (yes vs. no) were independent predictors of PFS. Patients with visceral metastases treated with inetetamab plus vinorelbine plus pyrotinib had a mPFS of 6.1(5.1-7.1) months. The toxicity of inetetamab was tolerable, with the most common grade 3/4 adverse event being leukopenia (4.7%).

Conclusions

HER2+ MBC patients pretreated with multiple-line therapies still respond to inetetamab-based treatment. Inetetamab combined with vinorelbine and pyrotinib may be the most effective treatment regimen, with a controllable and tolerable safety profile.

The prognostic value of tumor mutation burden (TMB) and its relationship with immune infiltration in breast cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

Although the tumor mutation burden (TMB) was reported as a biomarker for immunotherapy of various cancers, whether it can effectively predict the survival prognosis in breast cancer patients remains unclear. In this study, the prognostic value of TMB and its correlation with immune infiltration were explored by using multigroup studies.

METHODS

The somatic mutation data of 986 breast cancer patients were obtained from TCGA database. Breast cancer patients were divided into a low-TMB group and a high-TMB group according to the quartile of TMB scores. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified by the "limma" R program. The CIBERSORT algorithm was utilized to estimate the immune cell fraction of each sample. The TIMER database was utilized to evaluate the association between CNVs of immune genes and tumor immune cell infiltration and the prognostic value of the immune cells in breast cancer.

RESULTS

In breast cancer, TP53, PIK3CA, TTN, CDH1 and other genes were the most important mutated genes. Higher survival rate of patients was found in the low-TMB group. Among the top 10 DEGs, three of them belong to the KRT gene family. GSEA enrichment analysis showed that MAPK, Hedgehog, mTOR, TGF-bate and GnRH signaling pathways were enriched in the low-TMB group. The infiltration levels of the most of immune cells were higher in the low-TMB group (P < 0.01). Higher expression of CCL18 and TRGC1 was correlated with poor prognosis. Breast cancer patients with CCL18 copy number variations, especially arm-level gains, showed significantly decreased immune cell infiltration. In the low B cell infiltration group, the survival prognosis of breast cancer patients was poor.

CONCLUSIONS

TMB is a potential prognosis marker in breast cancer. Immune-related gene CCL18 and TRGC1 are biomarkers of poor prognosis while immune (B cell) infiltration is a biomarker of good prognosis.

The efficacy and safety of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide combined with pyrotinib in neoadjuvant treatment for HER2-positive breast cancer: A real-world study

Purpose

Long-term survival benefit of anthracyclines for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer is clear. In the neoadjuvant treatment, compared with the monoclonal antibody such as trastuzumab and pertuzumab, the clinical benefit of pyrotinib, a new small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), as the main anti-HER2 strategy currently requires more research to determine. Our real-world study is the first prospective observational study in China to evaluate the efficacy and safety of epirubicin (E) and cyclophosphamide (C) with pyrotinib as anti-HER2 therapy in the neoadjuvant setting of patients with stage II-III HER2-positive breast cancer.

Methods

From May 2019 to December 2021, 44 untreated patients with HER2-positive nonspecific invasive breast cancer who received 4 cycles of neoadjuvant EC with pyrotinib. The primary endpoint was pathological complete response (pCR) rate. Secondary endpoints included the overall clinical response, breast pathological complete response rate (bpCR), the rate of axillary lymph nodes pathological negativity and adverse events (AEs). Other objective indicators were the rate of surgical breast-conserving, the negative conversion ratios of tumor markers.

Results

Thirty-seven (84.1%) of 44 patients completed this neoadjuvant therapy, and 35 (79.5%) had surgery and were included in the primary endpoint assessment. The objective response rate (ORR) of 37 patients was 97.3%. Two patients reached clinical complete response, 34 obtained clinical partial response, 1 sustained stable disease, and no one had progressive disease. Eleven (31.4%) of 35 patients who had surgery achieved bpCR and the rate of axillary lymph nodes pathological negativity was 61.3%. The tpCR rate was 28.6% (95% CI: 12.8-44.3%). Safety was evaluated in all 44 patients. Thirty-nine (88.6%) had diarrhea, and 2 developed grade 3 diarrhea. Four (9.1%) patients had grade 4 leukopenia. All grade 3-4 AEs could be improved after symptomatic treatment.

Conclusion

The regimen of 4 cycles of EC combined with pyrotinib presented some feasibility in the neoadjuvant setting for HER2-positive breast cancer with manageable safety. New regimens with pyrotinib should be evaluated for higher pCR in future.

Trial registration

chictr.org Identifier: ChiCTR1900026061.

Neoadjuvant checkpoint blockade in combination with Chemotherapy in patients with tripe-negative breast cancer: exploratory analysis of real-world, multicenter data

PURPOSE

Despite the poor prognosis of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), it has been demonstrated that neoadjuvant immunotherapy in combination with chemotherapy can improve the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate and/or long-term outcome of TNBC. However, there have been no real-world studies reporting on the effectiveness of neoadjuvant checkpoint inhibitors in early TNBC.

METHODS

Between November 2019 and December 2021, 63 early TNBC patients treated with anti-PD-1 antibodies (pembrolizumab or camrelizumab) or anti-PD-L1 antibody (atezolizumab) in combination with chemotherapy at seven institutions were included. PCR1 defined as ypT0/Tis and ypN0 was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included pCR2 defined as ypT0/Tis, overall response rate (ORR), disease-free survival (DFS), drug-related adverse events (AEs) and biomarkers.

RESULTS

Among the patients in the current study, 34.9% of patients were able to achieve pCR1, and 47.6% of patients had achieved pCR2. The ORR was 82.5%. 33 patients with non-pCR2 tumors were found to have a median DFS of 20.7 months (95% CI 16.3 months-not reached). The DFS of patients with pCR2 and non-pCR2 after neoadjuvant therapy was significantly different (HR = 0.28, 95% CI 0.10-0.79; P = 0.038). The most common AEs were nausea (63.4%), fatigue (42.7%), leucopenia (30.0%) and elevated transaminase (11.7%).

CONCLUSION

It is possible to achieve a meaningful pCR rate and DFS by combining neoadjuvant checkpoint blockade with chemotherapy in patients with high-risk TNBC. Compared to clinical trials, however, there was a slightly lower pCR rate in this multicentered real-world study.

To Investigate Growth Factor Receptor Targets and Generate Cancer Targeting Inhibitors

Receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) regulates multiple pathways, including Mitogenactivated protein kinases (MAPKs), PI3/AKT, JAK/STAT pathway, etc. which has a significant role in the progression and metastasis of tumor. As RTK activation regulates numerous essential bodily processes, including cell proliferation and division, RTK dysregulation has been identified in many types of cancers. Targeting RTK is a significant challenge in cancer due to the abnormal upregulation and downregulation of RTK receptors subfamily EGFR, FGFR, PDGFR, VEGFR, and HGFR in the progression of cancer, which is governed by multiple RTK receptor signalling pathways and impacts treatment response and disease progression. In this review, an extensive focus has been carried out on the normal and abnormal signalling pathways of EGFR, FGFR, PDGFR, VEGFR, and HGFR and their association with cancer initiation and progression. These are explored as potential therapeutic cancer targets and therefore, the inhibitors were evaluated alone and merged with additional therapies in clinical trials aimed at combating global cancer.

The role of irreversible pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the treatment of HER2-Positive metastatic breast cancer

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is the leading cause of cancer death in women. For patients with HER2-positive MBC, after the failure of multiple lines of treatment, there is no optimal line of therapy. A series of clinical trials confirmed that treatment with irreversible pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in combination with chemotherapy significantly improves patients' survival outcomes. This review focuses on the pathogenesis of HER2-positive breast cancer, current standard treatments, mechanisms of approved irreversible TKIs, and key clinical trials. The available findings suggest that irreversible pan-HER TKIs, such as pyrotinib and neratinib, in combination with chemotherapy, represent a beneficial salvage therapy for patients with HER2-positive MBC with manageable toxicity. However, further studies are needed to assess the efficacy and safety of this combination therapy.

Treatment strategies for hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HR+/HER2+) metastatic breast cancer: A review

Hormone receptor-positive HER2-positive (HR+/HER2+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is a unique subtype of breast cancer. Most current guidelines recommend that combination regimens based on anti-HER2 therapy should be used as first-line treatment for HER2+ MBC, irrespective of HR status. Endocrine therapy can be applied as maintenance therapy for patients who are intolerant to chemotherapy or post-chemotherapy. Increasing evidence suggests that complex molecular crosstalk between HR and HER2 pathways may affect the sensitivity to both HER2-targeted and endocrine therapy in patients with HR+/HER2+ breast cancer. Recent research and clinical trials have revealed that a combination of endocrine therapy and anti-HER2 approaches without chemotherapy provides along-term disease control for some patients, but the challenge lies in how to accurately identify the subsets of patients who can benefit from such a de-chemotherapy treatment strategy. In this review, we aim to summarize the results of preclinical and clinical studies in HR+/HER2+ MBC and discuss the possibility of sparing chemotherapy in this subgroup of patients.

Real-World Outcome and Prognostic Factors Among HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Pyrotinib-Based Therapy: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis

Purpose

To explore the efficacy, safety, and potential factors influencing efficacy and outcome of pyrotinib-based therapy in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in complex clinical practice.

Methods

Real-world data for HER2-positive MBC patients treated with pyrotinib-based regimens from 6 hospitals in Northern Anhui, China, from September 2018 to February 2022, were retrospectively collected, and clinicopathological features, efficacy, prognosis, and safety were analyzed. Potential influencing factors including baseline serum vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A) for evaluating pyrotinib's treatment response and outcome were also explored.

Results

A total of 169 patients with HER2-positive MBC were enrolled. The objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and median progression-free survival (mPFS) of the overall cohort were 65.1%, 87.6%, and 12.4 months, respectively. Pyrotinib is highly beneficial as different treatment lines and appears to be a feasible strategy both in combination with chemotherapeutic drugs and alone. The mPFS values were 16.5 months, 12.4 months, and 9.3 months in the first, second, and third-or-higher lines of anti-HER2 therapy, respectively (P=0.027). The most common adverse event (AE) was diarrhea (88.2%), and patients with < grade 3 diarrhea achieved a longer mPFS than patients with ≥ grade 3 diarrhea (13.3 months vs 6.9 months, P=0.007). Among the patients with available baseline VEGF-A data, the ORR was 43.5% in patients with a high level of VEGF-A, compared to 81.5% in patients with a low level of VEGF-A (P=0.005). Moreover, patients in the VEGF-A-high group exhibited a shorter mPFS time than those in the VEGF-A-low group (7.8 months vs 19.1 months, P=0.004). Further analysis demonstrated AE of diarrhea and VEGF-A at baseline to be independent prognostic factors for PFS.

Conclusion

Pyrotinib-based regimens showed promising efficacy, with manageable tolerance, and AE occurrence of severe diarrhea and baseline level of serum VEGF-A are helpful in predicting the treatment outcome of pyrotinib in HER2-positive MBC.

The prognostic role of tumor mutation burden on survival of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

As a potential genetic biomarker, tumor mutation burden (TMB) has made progress in numerous tumors. There are limited data regarding TMB and its prognostic role is controversial in breast cancer. This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to assess the prognostic value of TMB on survival of breast cancer.

Methods

The databases PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched for articles published through May 31, 2022. Moreover, effective data were extracted from included studies and calculated pooled effects of hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) by STATA 16.0. Heterogeneity was conducted by the I² statistic and p-value. Using publication bias evaluation, sensitivity analysis, and subgroup analysis, the origin of heterogeneity was further investigated.

Results

They were up to 1,722 patients collected from sixteen cohorts for this analysis. The pooled effects of HR for both OS (HR: 1.14, 95% CI: 0.83,1.58, p > 0.01) and PFS (HR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.53,1.71, p > 0.01) indicated no statistically significant difference in the high TMB and low TMB group. In immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) subgroup, high TMB patients demonstrated benefit of OS (HR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.59,0.87, p = 0.001) and PFS (HR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.35,0.77, p < 0.001), whereas difference was not statistically significant in the non-ICIs subgroup (OS, HR:1.76, 95% CI: 0.97,3.20, p = 0.062; PFS, HR:2.31, 95% CI: 0.89,5.97, p = 0.086). In addition, sensitivity analysis revealed that the pooled effects were stable. The funnel plot and Begg's test suggested the absence of publication bias.

Conclusion

Meta-analysis revealed that the prognostic relevance of TMB in breast cancer is limited in scope. High TMB may be associated with longer survival only in ICIs-based treatment, but the association is not evident in non-ICIs-based treatment.

Trial registration

[https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO], Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO), identifier: CRD42022342488.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-10284-1.

Targeting the EGF receptor family in non-small cell lung cancer-increased complexity and future perspectives

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-associated mortality worldwide, but with the emergence of oncogene targeted therapies, treatment options have tremendously improved. Owing to their biological relevance, members of the ERBB receptor family, including the EGF receptor (EGFR), HER2, HER3 and HER4, are among the best studied oncogenic drivers. Activating EGFR mutations are frequently observed in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the established first line treatment option for patients whose tumors bear "typical/classical" EGFR mutations (exon 19 deletions, L858R point mutations). Additionally, new TKIs are rapidly evolving with better efficacy to overcome primary and secondary treatment resistance (e.g., that due to T790M or C797S resistance mutations). Some atypical EGFR mutations, such as the most frequent exon 20 insertions, exhibit relative resistance to earlier generation TKIs through steric hindrance. In this subgroup, newer TKIs, such as mobocertinib and the bi-specific antibody amivantamab have recently been approved, whereas less frequent atypical EGFR mutations remain understudied. In contrast to EGFR, HER2 has long remained a challenging target, but better structural understanding has led to the development of newer generations of TKIs. The recent FDA approval of the antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab-deruxtecan for pretreated patients with HER2 mutant NSCLC has been an important therapeutic breakthrough. HER3 and HER4 also exert oncogenic potential, and targeted treatment approaches are being developed, particularly for HER3. Overall, strategies to inhibit the oncogenic function of ERBB receptors in NSCLC are currently evolving at an unprecedented pace; therefore, this review summarizes current treatment standards and discusses the outlook for future developments.

Non-small Cell Lung Cancer with EGFR or HER2 Exon 20 Insertion Mutations: Diagnosis and Treatment Options

Molecular testing is performed upon diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) because of the large success of targeted therapies for oncogenic mutations. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are the most commonly identified mutation in NSCLC, and EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations (exon20ins) are the third most common mutation in EGFR following EGFR exon 19 deletions and exon 21 L858R mutations. EGFR exon20ins have regularly demonstrated resistance to classical EGFR inhibition. Two treatments-mobocertinib and amivantamab-have recently been the first drugs to be approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treatment of lung cancers with these mutations following platinum-based therapy. Research surrounding these two drugs demonstrates strong efficacy, but with an intense array of side effects. Another targetable driver mutation is the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) exon20ins, representing approximately 2-3% of NSCLC patients. This mutation has been heavily studied in vitro as well as clinically, and trastuzumab deruxtecan was just recently granted accelerated FDA approval based on the high efficacy demonstrated in the Destiny-Lung01 study. However, similar to their EGFR counterparts, HER2 inhibitors also have evidence of toxicity in clinical studies. In this paper, we discuss the limited response of EGFR and HER2 exon20ins to a wide range of standard treatment regimens, such as platinum-based chemotherapy and classic EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, as well as immunotherapy. We also review recently approved and upcoming targeted therapeutic options, considering what research is presently being done regarding efficacy and the reduction of side effects, as well as the agents' risks and benefits for incorporation into an approved treatment regimen.

Aptamer-siRNA chimeras: Promising tools for targeting HER2 signaling in cancer

RNA interference is a transformative approach and has great potential in the development of novel and more efficient cancer therapeutics. Immense prospects exist in the silencing of HER2 and its downstream genes which are overexpressed in many cancers, through exogenously delivered siRNA. However, there is still a long way to exploit the full potential and versatility of siRNA therapeutics due to the challenges associated with the stability and delivery of siRNA targeted to specific sites. Aptamers offer several advantages as a vehicle for siRNA delivery, over other carriers such as antibodies. In this review, we discuss the progress made in the development and applications of aptamer-siRNA chimeras in HER2 targeting and gene silencing. A schematic workflow is also provided which will provide ample insight for all those researchers who are new to this field. Also, we think that a mechanistic understanding of the HER2 signaling pathway is crucial in designing extensive investigations aimed at the silencing of a wider array of genes. This review is expected to stimulate more research on aptamer-siRNA chimeras targeted against HER2 which might arm us with potential effective therapeutic interventions for the management of cancer.

Cost-Effectiveness of Pyrotinib Plus Capecitabine versus Lapatinib Plus Capecitabine for the Treatment of HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer in China: A Scenario Analysis of Health Insurance Coverage

Background: The overexpression of the human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) gene is present in 20~25% of breast cancer (BC) patients, contributing to an inferior prognosis. Recent clinical trials showed that pyrotinib has promising antitumor activities and acceptable tolerability for those patients (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03080805 and NCT02422199). Therefore, this study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of pyrotinib plus capecitabine versus lapatinib plus capecitabine for patients with HER2-positive metastatic BC after prior trastuzumab. Methods: A lifetime-partitioned survival model was established to evaluate health and economic outcomes with different treatment strategies. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Data were derived from the published literature, clinical trials, expert opinions, and other local charges. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the findings. Scenario analyses were developed to make further evaluations. Results: The pyrotinib regimen had significant advantages over the lapatinib regimen after enrolling in the National Reimbursement Drug List (NRDL), with cost savings of USD 15,599.27 and a gain of 0.53 QALYs. Meanwhile, before enrolling in NRDL, the pyrotinib regimen afforded the same QALYs at a higher incremental cost of USD 45,400.64 versus the lapatinib regimen, producing an ICER of USD 85,944.79 per QALY. Scenario analyses yielded similar results. Sensitivity analyses suggested stability in the cost-effectiveness findings. Conclusions: Compared to lapatinib plus capecitabine, the pyrotinib plus capecitabine enrolled in NRDL is a cost-effective alternative second-line treatment for patients with HER2-positive metastatic BC in China.

Temporal Heterogeneity of HER2 Expression and Spatial Heterogeneity of 18F-FDG Uptake Predicts Treatment Outcome of Pyrotinib in Patients with HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer

Background: This study aimed to evaluate tumor heterogeneity of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and investigate its impact on the efficacy of pyrotinib in patients with HER2-positive MBC. Methods: MBC patients who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT before pyrotinib treatment were included. Temporal and spatial tumor heterogeneity was evaluated by the discordance between primary and metastatic immunohistochemistry (IHC) results and baseline 18F-FDG uptake heterogeneity (intertumoral and intratumoral heterogeneity indexes: HI-inter and HI-intra), respectively. Progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated by the Kaplan−Meier method and compared by a log-rank test. Results: A total of 572 patients were screened and 51 patients were included. In 36 patients with matched IHC results, 25% of them had HER2 status conversion. Patients with homogenous HER2 positivity had the longest PFS, followed by patients with gained HER2 positivity, while patients with HER2 negative conversion could not benefit from pyrotinib (16.8 vs. 13.7 vs. 3.6 months, p < 0.0001). In terms of spatial heterogeneity, patients with high HI-intra and HI-inter had significantly worse PFS compared to those with low heterogeneity (10.6 vs. 25.3 months, p = 0.023; 11.2 vs. 25.3 months, p = 0.040). Conclusions: Temporal heterogeneity of HER2 status and spatial heterogeneity of 18F-FDG uptake could predict the treatment outcome of pyrotinib in patients with HER2-positive MBC, which provide practically applicable methods to assess tumor heterogeneity and guidance for treatment decisions.

Efficacy and safety of pyrotinib-containing regimen in the patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: A multicenter real-world study

BACKGROUND

Pyrotinib, a novel irreversible epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (EGFR)/HER2 dual tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has shown promising antitumor efficacy with tolerable toxicity in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in several clinical trials. However, the clinical trials do not usually well reflect the patients in real clinical settings. Despite several small-sample studies in real world, the data on pyrotinib as first-line and third-or-later-line treatment and the efficacy comparison of pyrotinib combined with different regimens are still lacking. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of pyrotinib for the HER2-positive MBC in real world to replenish more comprehensive data.

METHODS

A total of 172 HER2-positive MBC patients treated with pyrotinib-based therapy were recruited from multiple centers in nonclinical trial settings from September 2017 to June 2020.

RESULTS

The median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 172 patients was 8.83 months. The patients, receiving first-line pyrotinib treatment, had the longest mPFS (20.93 months) compared with those receiving second-line (8.67 months, p = 0.0339) and third-or-later-line (7.13 months, p = 0.0075) treatments, respectively. Prior treatment with lapatinib (p = 0.012) and site of metastasis (visceral vs. nonvisceral) (p = 0.033) were the independent prognostic factors for PFS. The prior treatment with lapatinib compared with lapatinib-native treatment (5.96 vs. 10.97 months, p = 0.0036) and those with visceral metastasis compared with nonvisceral metastasis (8.40 vs. 23.70 months, p = 0.0138) had worse mPFS. Among 146 patients evaluated for efficacy, 2.1%, 58.9%, and 32.9% showed complete response, partial response, and stable disease, respectively. Adverse events occurred in 92.4% of the patients with 33.3% Grade 3 and higher adverse events and diarrhea (57.0%), anemia (44.8%), and leukopenia (40.7%) as the most frequent ones.

CONCLUSIONS

Pyrotinib-containing regimen could effectively treat HER2-positive MBC with acceptable toxicity, including the patients who progressed after lapatinib treatment and with brain metastasis.

Molecular perspective on targeted therapy in breast cancer: a review of current status

Breast cancer is categorized at the molecular level according to the status of certain hormone and growth factor receptors, and this classification forms the basis of current diagnosis and treatment. The development of resistance to treatment and recurrence of the disease have led researchers to develop new therapies. In recent years, most of the research in the field of oncology has focused on the development of targeted therapies, which are treatment methods developed directly against molecular abnormalities. Promising advances have been made in clinical trials investigating the effect of these new treatment modalities and their combinations with existing therapeutic treatments in the treatment of breast cancer. Monoclonal antibodies, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, antibody–drug conjugates, PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway inhibitors, cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors, anti-angiogenic drugs, PARP inhibitors are among the targeted therapies used in breast cancer treatment. In this review, we aim to present a molecular view of recently approved target agents used in breast cancer.

Pyrotinib plus capecitabine for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer and brain metastases (PERMEATE): a multicentre, single-arm, two-cohort, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer have a high risk of developing brain metastases. Efficacious treatment options are scarce. We investigated the activity and safety of pyrotinib plus capecitabine in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer and brain metastases.

METHODS

We did a multicentre, single-arm, two-cohort, phase 2 trial in eight tertiary hospitals in China. Patients aged 18 years or older who had radiotherapy-naive HER2-positive brain metastases (cohort A) or progressive disease after radiotherapy (cohort B), with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, received pyrotinib 400 mg orally once daily, and capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 orally twice daily for 14 days, followed by 7 days off every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was confirmed intracranial objective response rate by investigator assessment according to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours (version 1.1). Activity and safety were analysed in patients with at least one dose of study drug. The study is ongoing, but recruitment is complete. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03691051.

FINDINGS

Between Jan 29, 2019, and July 10, 2020, we enrolled 78 women: 51 (86%) of 59 patients in cohort A and 18 (95%) of 19 patients in cohort B had previous exposure to trastuzumab. Median follow-up duration was 15·7 months (IQR 9·7-19·0). The intracranial objective response rate was 74·6% (95% CI 61·6-85·0; 44 of 59 patients) in cohort A and 42·1% (20·3-66·5; eight of 19 patients) in cohort B. The most common grade 3 or worse treatment-emergent adverse event was diarrhoea (14 [24%] in cohort A and four [21%] in cohort B). Two (3%) patients in cohort A and three (16%) in cohort B had treatment-related serious adverse events. No treatment-related deaths occurred.

INTERPRETATION

To our knowledge, this is the first prospective study showing the activity and safety of pyrotinib plus capecitabine in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer and brain metastases, especially in radiotherapy-naive population. This combination deserves further validation in a randomised, controlled trial.

FUNDING

National Cancer Centre Climbing Foundation Key Project of China, Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals.

TRANSLATION

For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Prognostic value of tumor mutation burden and the relationship between tumor mutation burden and immune infiltration in HER2+ breast cancer: a gene expression-based study

BACKGROUND

Whether tumor mutation burden (TMB) correlated with improved survival outcomes or promotion of immunotherapies remained controversy in various malignancies. We aimed to explore the prognostic value of TMB and the relationship between TMB and immune infiltration in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer (BC).

METHODS

We downloaded somatic mutation data and clinical information for 216 HER2+ BC patients from the The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and cBioPortal databases. Patients were divided into high- and low-TMB groups through TMB calculation. Cox regression analysis was used to establish an immune- and mutant-related risk model based on 5-hub genes. The relationship between 5-hub genes mutants and the level of immune infiltration, as well as the relationship between the risk model and the immune microenvironment were analyzed by "TIMER" database.

RESULTS

TMB was negatively correlated with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), and high TMB may inhibit immune infiltration in HER2+ BC. Furthermore, risk score classified effectively patients into low- and high-risk groups in training and validation cohorts. The infiltration of CD4⁺ T cells and NK cells and the levels of immune checkpoint pathway genes were lower in the high-risk group, which indicated a poor prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher TMB correlated with poor survival outcomes and might inhibit the immune infiltrates in HER2+ BC. The 5-hub TMB-related signature conferred lower immune cells infiltration which deserved further validation.

EGFR and HER2 exon 20 insertions in solid tumours: from biology to treatment

Protein tyrosine kinases of the human epidermal growth factor receptor family, including EGFR and HER2, have emerged as important therapeutic targets in non-small-cell lung, breast and gastroesophageal cancers, and are of relevance for the treatment of various other malignancies (particularly colorectal cancer). Classic activating EGFR exon 19 deletions and exon 21 mutations, and HER2 amplification and/or overexpression, are predictive of response to matched molecularly targeted therapies, translating into favourable objective response rates and survival outcomes. By comparison, cancers with insertion mutations in exon 20 of either EGFR or HER2 are considerably less sensitive to the currently available tyrosine kinase inhibitors and antibodies targeting these receptors. These exon 20 insertions are structurally distinct from other EGFR and HER2 mutations, providing an explanation for this lack of sensitivity. In this Review, we first discuss the prevalence and pan-cancer distribution of EGFR and HER2 exon 20 insertions, their biology and detection, and associated responses to current molecularly targeted therapies and immunotherapies. We then focus on novel approaches that are being developed to more effectively target tumours driven by these non-classic EGFR and HER2 alterations.

Case Report: Effective Treatment With Pyrotinib and Capecitabine in a Heavily Pretreated Locally Advanced Breast Cancer Harboring Both HER2 Overexpression and Mutant

The prognosis for female patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) has improved with the emergence of novel drugs, especially for those who have HER2 overexpression or ERBB-2 amplification. Trastuzumab-based regimen has been the paradigm in guidelines as first-line therapy, whereas many patients got progressive disease after several cycles of treatment or rapidly progress because of primary resistance. Point mutations of ERBB2 gene occur in both HER2-amplication and non-amplification patients, with a 2% ratio in HER2 non-amplification cohort and 1.48% in HER2 amplication population. The acquired mutation ratio of ERBB2 substantially raised to 16.7%–17.7% in patients prior to trastuzumab treatment. ERBB2 mutation may be a critical reason of resistance and disease progression among the patients treated with anti-HER2 monoclonal trastuzumab or dual anti-HER2 antibodies with trastuzumab and pertuzumab, or tyrosine-kinase inhibitor. ERBB-2 mutation with L755S and V842I indicates resistance to trastuzumab, while that with L755S and K753I indicates resistance to lapatinib; these mutations maybe sensitive to pan-HER tyrosine-kinase inhibitors. A 48-year woman diagnosed with HER2-positive LABC developed trastuzumab resistance after three lines of trastuzumab cross-line treatment with partial response (PR) as the best response. The tissue was performed by next-generation sequencing (NGS), and the results discovered L755S in ERBB2 gene. Then, she received effective treatment with pyrotinib plus capecitabine and underwent mastectomy after six cycles of combined treatment with PR. Subsequently, breast mastectomy was performed, and she took pyrotinib plus capecitabine for 1 year and pyrotinib monotherapy for another 1 year as adjuvant therapy and achieved a long-term clinical benefit. In conclusion, pyrotinib is a potential neoadjuvant agent for patients who are heavily pretreated and harbor both ERBB2 amplification and ERBB2 mutant in locally advanced breast cancer.

Small Molecule Kinase Inhibitor Drugs (1995-2021): Medical Indication, Pharmacology, and Synthesis

The central role of dysregulated kinase activity in the etiology of progressive disorders, including cancer, has fostered incremental efforts on drug discovery programs over the past 40 years. As a result, kinase inhibitors are today one of the most important classes of drugs. The FDA approved 73 small molecule kinase inhibitor drugs until September 2021, and additional inhibitors were approved by other regulatory agencies during that time. To complement the published literature on clinical kinase inhibitors, we have prepared a review that recaps this large data set into an accessible format for the medicinal chemistry community. Along with the therapeutic and pharmacological properties of each kinase inhibitor approved across the world until 2020, we provide the synthesis routes originally used during the discovery phase, many of which were only available in patent applications. In the last section, we also provide an update on kinase inhibitor drugs approved in 2021.

The Efficacy of Pyrotinib as a Third- or Higher-Line Treatment in HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients Exposed to Lapatinib Compared to Lapatinib-Naive Patients: A Real-World Study

Background: Pyrotinib is a novel irreversible pan-ErbB receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Evidence of the efficacy of pyrotinib-based treatments for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in patients exposed to lapatinib is limited.

Methods: Ninety-four patients who received pyrotinib as a third- or higher-line treatment for HER2-positive MBC were included in this retrospective study. The primary and secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS). Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis were implemented to balance important patient characteristics between groups.

Results: Thirty (31.9%) patients were pretreated with lapatinib and subsequently received pyrotinib as an anti-HER2 treatment, and 64 (68.1%) patients did not receive this treatment. The OS and PFS indicated a beneficial trend in lapatinib-naive group compared to lapatinib-treated group in either the original cohort (PFS: 9.02 vs 6.36 months, p = 0.05; OS: 20.73 vs 14.35 months, p = 0.08) or the PSM (PFS: 9.02 vs 6.08 months, p = 0.07; OS: 19.07 vs 18.00 months, p = 0.61) or IPTW (PFS: 9.90 vs 6.17 months, p = 0.05; OS: 19.53 vs 15.10 months, p = 0.08) cohorts. Subgroup analyses demonstrated lapatinib treatment-related differences in PFS in the premenopausal subgroup and the no prior trastuzumab treatment subgroup, but no significant differences were observed in OS.

Conclusion: Pyrotinib-based therapy demonstrated promising effects in HER2-positive MBC patients in a real-world study, especially in lapatinib-naive patients, and also some activity in lapatinib-treated patients.

A common goal to CARE: Cancer Advocates, Researchers, and Clinicians Explore current treatments and clinical trials for breast cancer brain metastases

Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in women worldwide. Approximately one-tenth of all patients with advanced breast cancer develop brain metastases resulting in an overall survival rate of fewer than 2 years. The challenges lie in developing new approaches to treat, monitor, and prevent breast cancer brain metastasis (BCBM). This review will provide an overview of BCBM from the integrated perspective of clinicians, researchers, and patient advocates. We will summarize the current management of BCBM, including diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring. We will highlight ongoing translational research for BCBM, including clinical trials and improved detection methods that can become the mainstay for BCBM treatment if they demonstrate efficacy. We will discuss preclinical BCBM research that focuses on the intrinsic properties of breast cancer cells and the influence of the brain microenvironment. Finally, we will spotlight emerging studies and future research needs to improve survival outcomes and preserve the quality of life for patients with BCBM.

Pyrotinib Treatment in Patients With HER2-positive Metastatic Breast Cancer and Brain Metastasis: Exploratory Final Analysis of Real-World, Multicenter Data

PURPOSE

Patients with HER2-positive (HER2⁺) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) have poor prognoses. Pyrotinib has shown promising antitumor activity in MBC to improve progression-free survival (PFS). However, findings based on real-world data to analyze whether pyrotinib affects overall survival (OS) remain scarce.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

This real-world study is an exploratory analysis of brain metastasis (BM) and the final update of our preceding study of 168 patients with HER2⁺ MBC. PFS, OS, tumor mutation burden (TMB), clinical benefit rate (CBR), and overall response rate (ORR) were analyzed.

RESULTS

Pyrotinib treatment led to a median PFS time of 8.00 months and a median OS of 19.07 months in the 168 participants. High TMB was associated with poor OS (P = 0.0072) and PFS (P = 0.0028). In the 39 patients with BM, the median PFS and OS were 8.67 and 13.93 months, respectively. The surgery/radiation (S/R) group of patients with BM had prolonged survival (PFS: 9.97 vs. 7.73 months P = 0.19; OS: 20.67 vs. 12.43 months P = 0.021) compared with the no surgery/no radiation group (NS/NR). The CBR was 58.6% (S/R) vs. 41.4% (NS/NR), while the ORR was 24.1% (S/R) vs. 31.0% (NS/NR).

CONCLUSIONS

Pyrotinib shows promise as a novel pan-HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) for the treatment of BM and should be evaluated further. Surgical or radiotherapy in combination with pyrotinib was found to statistically improve OS in our cohort. TMB could be an exploratory biomarker for predicting PFS and OS, but its clinical application still needs further verification.

Oncogenic driver mutations in non-small cell lung cancer: Past, present and future

Lung cancer, of which non-small lung cancer is the most common subtype, represents the leading cause of cancer related-death worldwide. It is now recognized that a significant proportion of these patients present alterations in certain genes that drive oncogenesis. In recent years, more of these so-called oncogenic drivers have been identified, and a better understanding of their biology has allowed the development new targeted agents. This review aims to provide an update about the current landscape of driver mutation in non-small-cell lung cancer. Alterations in Kirsten rat sarcoma, epidermal growth factor receptor, MET, anaplastic lymphoma kinase, c-ROS oncogene 1, v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B, neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase, human epidermal growth factor 2, neuregulin-1 and rearranged during transfection are discussed, as well as agents targeting these alterations. Current standards of treatment as well as promising future strategies are presented. Currently, more than fifteen targeted agents are food and Drug administration-approved for seven oncogenic drivers in non-small-cell lung cancer, highlighting the importance of actively searching for these mutations. Continuous and future efforts made in defining the biology of each of these alterations will help to elucidate their respective resistance mechanisms, and to define the best treatment strategy and therapeutic sequence.

Pyrotinib Combined With Vinorelbine in HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

Introduction

Pyrotinib plus capecitabine has been approved in China for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Meanwhile, vinorelbine is another important chemotherapy option for MBC available in oral and intravenous forms. Thus, pyrotinib plus vinorelbine may represent a new treatment option, particularly for patients with failed capecitabine treatment. This study reported the first real-world data for pyrotinib plus vinorelbine therapy in HER2+ MBC.

Methods

HER2+ MBC patients (n = 97) treated with pyrotinib plus vinorelbine in six institutions across China from May 2018 to June 2020 were enrolled. Progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and toxicity profiles were determined.

Results

Sixty-seven percent of patients received more than two lines of systematic therapy. Nearly all patients (97.9%) had received trastuzumab and 50.5% were administered lapatinib. When combined with pyrotinib, 74.2% received oral and 25.8% received intravenous vinorelbine. Median PFS (mPFS) was 7.8 (range, 4.7–10.8) months for all patients. The mPFS in patients administered pyrotinib as second-line therapy and third-or-higher-line therapy were 12.0 and 6.4 months, respectively. Patients who received pyrotinib plus oral or intravenous vinorelbine had similar mPFS (7.8 vs. 6.4 months, p = 0.871). The 23 patients with brain metastases had mPFS of 6.3 (range, 3.4–9.2) months. Lapatinib-naïve patients had significantly longer PFS than lapatinib-treated patients (10.8 months vs. 5.6 months, p = 0.020). Median OS was not achieved. The ORR for 96 patients was 34.3%. Common grade 3 and 4 adverse events were diarrhea (22.7%), neutropenia (7.2%), and leukopenia (4.1%).

Conclusions

Pyrotinib plus vinorelbine therapy demonstrated promising effects in HER2+ MBC with tolerable toxicity, particularly in patients with second-line treatment and without prior lapatinib treatment, as well as in patients with brain metastases. Oral vinorelbine is a useful alternative to the intravenous form when combined with pyrotinib.

Clinical Trial Registration

[ClinicalTrials.gov], identifier [NCT04517305].

Breast Cancer Therapeutics and Biomarkers: Past, Present, and Future Approaches

Breast cancer (BC) is the leading cause of cancer death in women and the second-most common cancer. An estimated 281 550 new cases of invasive BC will be diagnosed in women in the United States, and about 43 600 will die during 2021. Continual research has shed light on all disease areas, including tumor classification and biomarkers for diagnosis/prognosis. As research investigations evolve, new classes of drugs are emerging with potential benefits in BC treatment that are covered in this manuscript. The initial sections present updated classification and terminology used for diagnosis and prognosis, which leads to the following topics, discussing the past and present treatments available for BC. Our review will generate interest in exploring the complexity of the cell cycle and its association with cancer biology as part of the plethora of target factors toward developing newer drugs and effective therapeutic management of BC.

Management of Brain and Leptomeningeal Metastases from Breast Cancer

The management of breast cancer (BC) has rapidly evolved in the last 20 years. The improvement of systemic therapy allows a remarkable control of extracranial disease. However, brain (BM) and leptomeningeal metastases (LM) are frequent complications of advanced BC and represent a challenging issue for clinicians. Some prognostic scales designed for metastatic BC have been employed to select fit patients for adequate therapy and enrollment in clinical trials. Different systemic drugs, such as targeted therapies with either monoclonal antibodies or small tyrosine kinase molecules, or modified chemotherapeutic agents are under investigation. Major aims are to improve the penetration of active drugs through the blood-brain barrier (BBB) or brain-tumor barrier (BTB), and establish the best sequence and timing of radiotherapy and systemic therapy to avoid neurocognitive impairment. Moreover, pharmacologic prevention is a new concept driven by the efficacy of targeted agents on macrometastases from specific molecular subgroups. This review aims to provide an overview of the clinical and molecular factors involved in the selection of patients for local and/or systemic therapy, as well as the results of clinical trials on advanced BC. Moreover, insight on promising therapeutic options and potential directions of future therapeutic targets against BBB and microenvironment are discussed.

Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in the Combination Therapy of HER2 Positive Breast Cancer

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer (BC) accounts for about 20% to 30% of all BC subtypes and is characterized by invasive disease and poor prognosis. With the emergence of anti-HER2 target drugs, HER2-positive BC patient outcomes have changed dramatically. However, treatment failure is mostly due to drug resistance and the special treatment needs of different subgroups. Small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors can inhibit multiple targets of the human epidermal growth factor receptor family and activate PI3K/AKT, MAPK, PLC γ, ERK1/2, JAK/STAT, and other pathways affecting the expression of MDM2, mTOR, p27, and other transcription factors. This can help regulate the differentiation, apoptosis, migration, growth, and adhesion of normal cells and reverse drug resistance to a certain extent. These inhibitors can cross the blood-brain barrier and be administered orally. They have a good synergistic effect with effective drugs such as trastuzumab, pertuzumab, t-dm1, and cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors. These advantages have resulted in small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors attracting attention. The new small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor was investigated in multi-target anti-HER2 therapy, showed a good effect in preclinical and clinical trials, and to some extent, improved the prognosis of HER2-positive BC patients. Its use could lead to a de-escalation of treatment in some patients, possibly preventing unnecessary procedures along with the associated side effects and costs.