Comparison of Radiomics-Based Machine-Learning Classifiers in Diagnosis of Glioblastoma From Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma

The radiomics nomogram predicts the prognosis of pancreatic cancer patients with hepatic metastasis after chemoimmunotherapy

OBJECTIVE

To construct a prognostic model based on MR features and clinical data to evaluate the progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR) of pancreatic cancer patients with hepatic metastases who received chemoimmunotherapy.

METHODS

105 pancreatic cancer patients with hepatic metastases who received chemoimmunotherapy were assigned to the training set (n = 52), validation set (n = 22), and testing set (n = 31). Multi-lesion volume of interest were delineated, multi-sequence radiomics features were extracted, and the radiomics models for predicting PFS, OS and ORR were constructed, respectively. Clinical variables were extracted, and the clinical models for predicting PFS, OS and ORR were constructed, respectively. The nomogram was jointly constructed by radiomics model and clinical model.

RESULT

The ORR exhibits no significant correlation with either PFS or OS. The area under the curve (AUC) of nomogram for predicting 6-month PFS reached 0.847 (0.737-0.957), 0.786 (0.566-1.000) and 0.864 (0.735-0.994) in the training set, validation set and testing set, respectively. The AUC of nomogram for predicting 1-year OS reached 0.770 (0.635-0.906), 0.743 (0.479-1.000) and 0.818 (0.630-1.000), respectively. The AUC of nomogram for predicting ORR reached 0.914 (0.828-1.00), 0.938 (0.840-1.00) and 0.846 (0.689-1.00), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The prognostic models based on MR imaging features and clinical data are effective in predicting the PFS, OS and ORR of chemoimmunotherapy in pancreatic cancer patients with hepatic metastasis, and can be used to evaluate the prognosis of patients.

Radiomics for differentiation of gliomas from primary central nervous system lymphomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and objective

Numerous radiomics-based models have been proposed to discriminate between central nervous system (CNS) gliomas and primary central nervous system lymphomas (PCNSLs). Given the heterogeneity of the existing models, we aimed to define their overall performance and identify the most critical variables to pilot future algorithms.

Methods

A systematic review of the literature and a meta-analysis were conducted, encompassing 12 studies and a total of 1779 patients, focusing on radiomics to differentiate gliomas from PCNSLs. A comprehensive literature search was performed through PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus databases. Overall sensitivity (SEN) and specificity (SPE) were estimated. Event rates were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis, and the heterogeneity was assessed using the χ2 test.

Results

The overall SEN and SPE for differentiation between CNS gliomas and PCNSLs were 88% (95% CI = 0.83 - 0.91) and 87% (95% CI = 0.83 - 0.91), respectively. The best-performing features were the ones extracted from the Gray Level Run Length Matrix (GLRLM; ACC 97%), followed by those obtained from the Neighboring Gray Tone Difference Matrix (NGTDM; ACC 93%), and shape-based features (ACC 91%). The 18F-FDG-PET/CT was the best-performing imaging modality (ACC 97%), followed by the MRI CE-T1W (ACC 87% - 95%). Most studies applied a cross-validation analysis (92%).

Conclusion

The current SEN and SPE of radiomics to discriminate CNS gliomas from PCNSLs are high, making radiomics a helpful method to differentiate these tumor types. The best-performing features are the GLRLM, NGTDM, and shape-based features. The 18F-FDG-PET/CT imaging modality is the best-performing, while the MRI CE-T1W is the most used.

Fully automated MR-based virtual biopsy of primary CNS lymphomas

Background

Primary central nervous system lymphomas (PCNSL) pose a challenge as they may mimic gliomas on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) imaging, compelling precise differentiation for appropriate treatment. This study focuses on developing an automated MRI-based workflow to distinguish between PCNSL and gliomas.

Methods

MRI examinations of 240 therapy-naive patients (141 males and 99 females, mean age: 55.16 years) with cerebral gliomas and PCNSLs (216 gliomas and 24 PCNSLs), each comprising a non-contrast T1-weighted, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted sequence were included in the study. HD-GLIO, a pre-trained segmentation network, was used to generate segmentations automatically. To validate the segmentation efficiency, 237 manual segmentations were prepared (213 gliomas and 24 PCNSLs). Subsequently, radiomics features were extracted following feature selection and training of an XGBoost algorithm for classification.

Results

The segmentation models for gliomas and PCNSLs achieved a mean Sørensen-Dice coefficient of 0.82 and 0.80 for whole tumors, respectively. Three classification models were developed in this study to differentiate gliomas from PCNSLs. The first model differentiated PCNSLs from gliomas, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.99 (F1-score: 0.75). The second model discriminated between high-grade gliomas and PCNSLs with an AUC of 0.91 (F1-score: 0.6), and the third model differentiated between low-grade gliomas and PCNSLs with an AUC of 0.95 (F1-score: 0.89).

Conclusions

This study serves as a pilot investigation presenting an automated virtual biopsy workflow that distinguishes PCNSLs from cerebral gliomas. Prior to clinical use, it is necessary to validate the results in a prospective multicenter setting with a larger number of PCNSL patients.

Predicting micropapillary or solid pattern of lung adenocarcinoma with CT-based radiomics, conventional radiographic and clinical features

BACKGROUND

To build prediction models with radiomics features, clinical/conventional radiographic signs and combined scores for the discrimination of micropapillary or solid subtypes (high-risk subtypes) of lung adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled 351 patients with and without high-risk subtypes. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression with cross-validation was performed to determine the optimal features of radiomics model. Missing clinical data were imputed by Multiple Imputation with Chain Equations (MICE). Clinical model with radiographic signs was built and scores of both models were integrated to establish combined model. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves, area under ROC curves and decision curve analysis (DCA) were plotted to evaluate the model performance and clinical application.

RESULTS

Stratified splitting allocated 246 patients into training set. MICE for missing values obtained complete and unbiased data for the following analysis. Ninety radiomic features and four clinical/conventional radiographic signs were used to predict the high-risk subtypes. The radiomic model, clinical model and combined model achieved AUCs of 0.863 (95%CI: 0.817-0.909), 0.771 (95%CI: 0.713-0.713) and 0.872 (95%CI: 0.829-0.916) in the training set, and 0.849 (95%CI: 0.774-0.924), 0.778 (95%CI: 0.687-0.868) and 0.853 (95%CI: 0.782-0.925) in the test set. Decision curve showed that the radiomic and combined models were more clinically useful when the threshold reached 37.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiomics features could facilitate the prediction of subtypes of lung adenocarcinoma. A simple combination of radiomics and clinical scores generated a robust model with high performance for the discrimination of micropapillary or solid subtype of lung adenocarcinoma.

Machine learning models based on multi-parameter MRI radiomics for prediction of molecular glioblastoma: a new study based on the 2021 World Health Organization classification

BACKGROUND

The 2021 World Health Organization (WHO) classification considers a histological low grade glioma with specific molecular characteristics as molecular glioblastoma (mGBM). Accurate identification of mGBM will aid in risk stratification of glioma patients.

PURPOSE

To explore the value of machine learning models based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics features in predicting mGBM.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In total, 166 patients histologically diagnosed as low-grade diffuse glioma (WHO II and III) were included in the study. Fifty-three cases were reclassified as mGBM based on molecular status. Four dimensionality reduction methods including distance correlation (DC), gradient boosted decision tree (GBDT), least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and minimal redundancy maximal relevance (MRMR) were used to select the optimal signatures. Six machine learning algorithms including support vector machine (SVM), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), neural network (NN), logistic regression (LR), K-nearest neighbour (KNN) and decision tree (DT) were used to develop the classifiers. The relative SD was used to evaluate the stability of the models, and the area under the curve values in the independent test group were used to evaluate their performances.

RESULTS

NN_DC was determined as the optimal classifier due to the highest area under the curve of 0.891 in the test group. The classification accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of NN_DC were 0.915, 0.842, 0.950, 0.889 and 0.927, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Machine learning models can predict mGBM non-invasively, which may help to develop personalized treatment strategies for neurosurgeons and provide an effective tool for accurate stratification in clinical trials.

Deep learning-based overall survival prediction model in patients with rare cancer: a case study for primary central nervous system lymphoma

PURPOSE

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare, aggressive form of extranodal non-Hodgkin lymphoma. To predict the overall survival (OS) in advance is of utmost importance as it has the potential to aid clinical decision-making. Though radiomics-based machine learning (ML) has demonstrated the promising performance in PCNSL, it demands large amounts of manual feature extraction efforts from magnetic resonance images beforehand. deep learning (DL) overcomes this limitation.

METHODS

In this paper, we tailored the 3D ResNet to predict the OS of patients with PCNSL. To overcome the limitation of data sparsity, we introduced data augmentation and transfer learning, and we evaluated the results using r stratified k-fold cross-validation. To explain the results of our model, gradient-weighted class activation mapping was applied.

RESULTS

We obtained the best performance (the standard error) on post-contrast T1-weighted (T1Gd)-area under curve [Formula: see text], accuracy [Formula: see text], precision [Formula: see text], recall [Formula: see text] and F1-score [Formula: see text], while compared with ML-based models on clinical data and radiomics data, respectively, further confirming the stability of our model. Also, we observed that PCNSL is a whole-brain disease and in the cases where the OS is less than 1 year, it is more difficult to distinguish the tumor boundary from the normal part of the brain, which is consistent with the clinical outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

All these findings indicate that T1Gd can improve prognosis predictions of patients with PCNSL. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time to use DL to explain model patterns in OS classification of patients with PCNSL. Future work would involve collecting more data of patients with PCNSL, or additional retrospective studies on different patient populations with rare diseases, to further promote the clinical role of our model.

Integrative Prognostic Machine Learning Models in Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), an incurable B-cell malignancy, benefit from accurate pretreatment disease stratification. We curated an extensive database of 862 patients diagnosed between 2014 and 2022. A machine learning (ML) gradient-boosted model incorporated baseline features from clinicopathologic, cytogenetic, and genomic data with high predictive power discriminating between patients with indolent or responsive MCL and those with aggressive disease (AUC ROC = 0.83). In addition, we utilized the gradient-boosted framework as a robust feature selection method for multivariate logistic and survival modeling. The best ML models incorporated features from clinical and genomic data types highlighting the need for correlative molecular studies in precision oncology. As proof of concept, we launched our most accurate and practical models using an application interface, which has potential for clinical implementation. We designated the 20-feature ML model-based index the "integrative MIPI" or iMIPI and a similar 10-feature ML index the "integrative simplified MIPI" or iMIPI-s. The top 10 baseline prognostic features represented in the iMIPI-s are: lactase dehydrogenase (LDH), Ki-67%, platelet count, bone marrow involvement percentage, hemoglobin levels, the total number of observed somatic mutations, TP53 mutational status, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance level, beta-2 microglobulin, and morphology. Our findings emphasize that prognostic applications and indices should include molecular features, especially TP53 mutational status. This work demonstrates the clinical utility of complex ML models and provides further evidence for existing prognostic markers in MCL.

Significance

Our model is the first to integrate a dynamic algorithm with multiple clinical and molecular features, allowing for accurate predictions of MCL disease outcomes in a large patient cohort.

Bibliometric research on the developments of artificial intelligence in radiomics toward nervous system diseases

Background

The growing interest suggests that the widespread application of radiomics has facilitated the development of neurological disease diagnosis, prognosis, and classification. The application of artificial intelligence methods in radiomics has increasingly achieved outstanding prediction results in recent years. However, there are few studies that have systematically analyzed this field through bibliometrics. Our destination is to study the visual relationships of publications to identify the trends and hotspots in radiomics research and encourage more researchers to participate in radiomics studies.

Methods

Publications in radiomics in the field of neurological disease research can be retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection. Analysis of relevant countries, institutions, journals, authors, keywords, and references is conducted using Microsoft Excel 2019, VOSviewer, and CiteSpace V. We analyze the research status and hot trends through burst detection.

Results

On October 23, 2022, 746 records of studies on the application of radiomics in the diagnosis of neurological disorders were retrieved and published from 2011 to 2023. Approximately half of them were written by scholars in the United States, and most were published in Frontiers in Oncology, European Radiology, Cancer, and SCIENTIFIC REPORTS. Although China ranks first in the number of publications, the United States is the driving force in the field and enjoys a good academic reputation. NORBERT GALLDIKS and JIE TIAN published the most relevant articles, while GILLIES RJ was cited the most. RADIOLOGY is a representative and influential journal in the field. "Glioma" is a current attractive research hotspot. Keywords such as "machine learning," "brain metastasis," and "gene mutations" have recently appeared at the research frontier.

Conclusion

Most of the studies focus on clinical trial outcomes, such as the diagnosis, prediction, and prognosis of neurological disorders. The radiomics biomarkers and multi-omics studies of neurological disorders may soon become a hot topic and should be closely monitored, particularly the relationship between tumor-related non-invasive imaging biomarkers and the intrinsic micro-environment of tumors.

Differentiating glioblastoma from primary central nervous system lymphoma of atypical manifestation using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: A comparative study

Background

The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic efficiency of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of single parameters, unimodality, and bimodality in distinguishing glioblastoma (GBM) from atypical primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) based on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) enhancement, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), and proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (¹H-MRS) findings.

Methods

The cohort included 108 patients pathologically diagnosed with GBM and 54 patients pathologically diagnosed with PCNSL. Pretreatment morphological MRI, DWI, DSC, DTI and MRS were all performed on each patient. The quantitative parameters of multimodal MRI were measured and compared between the patients in the GBM and atypical PCNSL groups, and those parameters showing a significant difference (p < 0.05) between patients in the GBM and atypical PCNSL groups were used to develop one-parameters, unimodality, and bimodality models. We evaluated the efficiency of different models in distinguishing GBM from atypical PCNSL by performing receiver operating characteristic analysis (ROC).

Results

Atypical PCNSL had lower minimum apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC_min), mean ADC (ADC_mean), relative ADC (rADC), mean relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV_mean), maximum rCBV (rCBV_max), fractional anisotropy (FA), axial diffusion coefficient (DA) and radial diffusion coefficient (DR) values and higher choline/creatine (Cho/Cr) and lipid/creatine (Lip/Cr) ratios than GBM (all p < 0.05). The rCBV_max, DTI and DSC + DTI data were optimal models of single-parameter, unimodality and bimodality for differentiation of GBM from atypical PCNSL, yielding areas under the curves (AUCs) of 0.905, 0.954, and 0.992, respectively.

Conclusions

Models of single-parameter, unimodality and bimodality based on muti multiparameter functional MRI may help to discriminate GBM from atypical PCNSL.

Radiomics-Based Machine Learning Model for Predicting Overall and Progression-Free Survival in Rare Cancer: A Case Study for Primary CNS Lymphoma Patients

Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma (PCNSL) is an aggressive neoplasm with a poor prognosis. Although therapeutic progresses have significantly improved Overall Survival (OS), a number of patients do not respond to HD–MTX-based chemotherapy (15–25%) or experience relapse (25–50%) after an initial response. The reasons underlying this poor response to therapy are unknown. Thus, there is an urgent need to develop improved predictive models for PCNSL. In this study, we investigated whether radiomics features can improve outcome prediction in patients with PCNSL. A total of 80 patients diagnosed with PCNSL were enrolled. A patient sub-group, with complete Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) series, were selected for the stratification analysis. Following radiomics feature extraction and selection, different Machine Learning (ML) models were tested for OS and Progression-free Survival (PFS) prediction. To assess the stability of the selected features, images from 23 patients scanned at three different time points were used to compute the Interclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and to evaluate the reproducibility of each feature for both original and normalized images. Features extracted from Z-score normalized images were significantly more stable than those extracted from non-normalized images with an improvement of about 38% on average (p-value < 10−12). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) showed that radiomics-based prediction overcame prediction based on current clinical prognostic factors with an improvement of 23% for OS and 50% for PFS, respectively. These results indicate that radiomics features extracted from normalized MR images can improve prognosis stratification of PCNSL patients and pave the way for further study on its potential role to drive treatment choice.

An integrative non-invasive malignant brain tumors classification and Ki-67 labeling index prediction pipeline with radiomics approach

BACKGROUND

The histological sub-classes of brain tumors and the Ki-67 labeling index (LI) of tumor cells are major factors in the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment management of patients. Many existing studies primarily focused on the classification of two classes of brain tumors and the Ki-67LI of gliomas. This study aimed to develop a preoperative non-invasive radiomics pipeline based on multiparametric-MRI to classify-three types of brain tumors, glioblastoma (GBM), metastasis (MET) and primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL), and to predict their corresponding Ki-67LI.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 153 patients with malignant brain tumors were involved. The radiomics features were extracted from three types of MRI (T1-weighted imaging (T1WI), fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (CE-T1WI)) with three masks (tumor core, edema, and whole tumor masks) and selected by a combination of Pearson correlation coefficient (CORR), LASSO, and Max-Relevance and Min-Redundancy (mRMR) filters. The performance of six classifiers was compared and the top three performing classifiers were used to construct the ensemble learning model (ELM). The proposed ELM was evaluated in the training dataset (108 patients) by 5-fold cross-validation and in the test dataset (45 patients) by hold-out. The accuracy (ACC), sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), F1-Score, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) indicators evaluated the performance of the models.

RESULTS

The best feature sets and ELM with the optimal performance were selected to construct the tri-categorized brain tumor aided diagnosis model (training dataset AUC: 0.96 (95% CI: 0.93, 0.99); test dataset AUC: 0.93) and Ki-67LI prediction model (training dataset AUC: 0.96 (95% CI: 0.94, 0.98); test dataset AUC: 0.91). The CE-T1WI was the best single modality for all classifiers. Meanwhile, the whole tumor was the most vital mask for the tumor classification and the tumor core was the most vital mask for the Ki-67LI prediction.

CONCLUSION

The developed radiomics models led to the precise preoperative classification of GBM, MET, and PCNSL and the prediction of Ki-67LI, which could be utilized in clinical practice for the treatment planning for brain tumors.

The application of machine learning to imaging in hematological oncology: A scoping review

Background

Here, we conducted a scoping review to (i) establish which machine learning (ML) methods have been applied to hematological malignancy imaging; (ii) establish how ML is being applied to hematological cancer radiology; and (iii) identify addressable research gaps.

Methods

The review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. The inclusion criteria were (i) pediatric and adult patients with suspected or confirmed hematological malignancy undergoing imaging (population); (ii) any study using ML techniques to derive models using radiological images to apply to the clinical management of these patients (concept); and (iii) original research articles conducted in any setting globally (context). Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 criteria were used to assess diagnostic and segmentation studies, while the Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess the quality of observational studies.

Results

Of 53 eligible studies, 33 applied diverse ML techniques to diagnose hematological malignancies or to differentiate them from other diseases, especially discriminating gliomas from primary central nervous system lymphomas (n=18); 11 applied ML to segmentation tasks, while 9 applied ML to prognostication or predicting therapeutic responses, especially for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. All studies reported discrimination statistics, but no study calculated calibration statistics. Every diagnostic/segmentation study had a high risk of bias due to their case-control design; many studies failed to provide adequate details of the reference standard; and only a few studies used independent validation.

Conclusion

To deliver validated ML-based models to radiologists managing hematological malignancies, future studies should (i) adhere to standardized, high-quality reporting guidelines such as the Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging; (ii) validate models in independent cohorts; (ii) standardize volume segmentation methods for segmentation tasks; (iv) establish comprehensive prospective studies that include different tumor grades, comparisons with radiologists, optimal imaging modalities, sequences, and planes; (v) include side-by-side comparisons of different methods; and (vi) include low- and middle-income countries in multicentric studies to enhance generalizability and reduce inequity.

Progress of radiological‑pathological workflows in the differential diagnosis between primary central nervous system lymphoma and high‑grade glioma (Review)

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) and high‑grade glioma (HGG) are distinct entities of the CNS with completely distinct treatments. The treatment of PCNSL is chemotherapy‑based, while surgery is the first choice for HGG. However, the clinical features of the two entities often overlap, and a clear pathological diagnosis is important for subsequent management, especially for the management of PCNSL. Stereotactic biopsy is recognized as one of the minimally invasive alternatives for evaluating the involvement of the CNS. However, in the case of limited tissue materials, the differential diagnosis between the two entities is still difficult. In addition, some patients are too ill to tolerate a needle biopsy. Therefore, combining imaging, histopathology and laboratory examinations is essential in order to make a clear diagnosis as soon as possible. The present study reviews the progress of comparative research on both imaging and laboratory tests based on the pathophysiological changes of the two entities, and proposes an integrative and optimized diagnostic process, with the purpose of building a better understanding for neurologists, hematologists, radiologists and pathologists.

Classifying primary central nervous system lymphoma from glioblastoma using deep learning and radiomics based machine learning approach - a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Glioblastoma (GBM) and primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) are common in elderly yet difficult to differentiate on MRI. Their management and prognosis are quite different. Recent surge of interest in predictive analytics, using machine learning (ML) from radiomic features and deep learning (DL) for diagnosing, predicting response and prognosticating disease has evinced interest among radiologists and clinicians. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the deep learning &amp; ML algorithms in classifying PCNSL from GBM.

Methods

The authors performed a systematic review of the literature from MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane central trials register for the search strategy in accordance with PRISMA guidelines to select and evaluate studies that included themes of ML, DL, AI, GBM, PCNSL. All studies reporting on ML algorithms or DL that for differentiating PCNSL from GBM on MR imaging were included. These studies were further narrowed down to focus on works published between 2018 and 2021. Two researchers independently conducted the literature screening, database extraction and risk bias assessment. The extracted data was synthesised and analysed by forest plots. Outcomes assessed were test characteristics such as accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and balanced accuracy.

Results

Ten articles meeting the eligibility criteria were identified addressing use of ML and DL in training and validation classifiers to distinguish PCNSL from GBM on MR imaging. The total sample size was 1311 in the included studies. ML approach was used in 6 studies while DL in 4 studies. The lowest reported sensitivity was 80%, while the highest reported sensitivity was 99% in studies in which ML and DL was directly compared with the gold standard histopathology. The lowest reported specificity was 87% while the highest reported specificity was 100%. The highest reported balanced accuracy was 100% and the lowest was 84%.

Conclusions

Extensive search of the database revealed a limited number of studies that have applied ML or DL to differentiate PCNSL from GBM. Of the currently published studies, Both DL &amp; ML algorithms have demonstrated encouraging results and certainly have the potential to aid neurooncologists in taking preoperative decisions in the future leading to not only reduction in morbidities but also be cost effective.

Multi-task learning-based feature selection and classification models for glioblastoma and solitary brain metastases

Purpose

To investigate the diagnostic performance of feature selection via a multi-task learning model in distinguishing primary glioblastoma from solitary brain metastases.

Method

The study involved 187 patients diagnosed at Xiangya Hospital, Yunnan Provincial Cancer Hospital, and Southern Cancer Hospital between January 2010 and December 2018. Radiomic features were extracted from conventional magnetic resonance imaging including T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted sequences. We proposed a new multi-task learning model using these three sequences as three tasks. Multi-series fusion was performed to complement the information from different dimensions in order to enhance model robustness. Logical loss was used in the model as the data-fitting item, and the feature weights were expressed in the logical loss space as the sum of shared weights and private weights to select the common features of each task and the characteristics having an essential impact on a single task. A diagnostic model was constructed as a feature selection method as well as a classification method. We calculated accuracy, recall, precision, and area under the curve (AUC) and compared the performance of our new multi-task model with traditional diagnostic model performance.

Results

A diagnostic model combining the support vector machine algorithm as a classification algorithm and our model as a feature selection method had an average AUC of 0.993 in the training set, with AUC, accuracy, precision, and recall rates respectively of 0.992, 0.920, 0.969, and 0.871 in the test set. The diagnostic model built on our multi-task model alone, in the training set, had an average AUC of 0.987, and in the test set, the AUC, accuracy, precision, and recall rates were 0.984, 0.895, 0.954, and 0.838.

Conclusion

It is feasible to implement the multi-task learning model developed in our study using logistic regression to differentiate between glioblastoma and solitary brain metastases.

Application of Artificial Intelligence Methods for Imaging of Spinal Metastasis

Spinal metastasis is the most common malignant disease of the spine. Recently, major advances in machine learning and artificial intelligence technology have led to their increased use in oncological imaging. The purpose of this study is to review and summarise the present evidence for artificial intelligence applications in the detection, classification and management of spinal metastasis, along with their potential integration into clinical practice. A systematic, detailed search of the main electronic medical databases was undertaken in concordance with the PRISMA guidelines. A total of 30 articles were retrieved from the database and reviewed. Key findings of current AI applications were compiled and summarised. The main clinical applications of AI techniques include image processing, diagnosis, decision support, treatment assistance and prognostic outcomes. In the realm of spinal oncology, artificial intelligence technologies have achieved relatively good performance and hold immense potential to aid clinicians, including enhancing work efficiency and reducing adverse events. Further research is required to validate the clinical performance of the AI tools and facilitate their integration into routine clinical practice.

Differentiation of malignant brain tumor types using intratumoral and peritumoral radiomic features

Tumor infiltration of central nervous system (CNS) malignant tumors may extend beyond visible contrast enhancement. This study explored tumor habitat characteristics in the intratumoral and peritumoral regions to distinguish common malignant brain tumors such as glioblastoma, primary central nervous system lymphoma, and brain metastases. The preoperative MRI data of 200 patients with solitary malignant brain tumors were included from two datasets for training. Quantitative radiomic features from the intratumoral and peritumoral regions were extracted for model training. The performance of the model was evaluated using data (n = 50) from the third clinical center. When combining the intratumoral and peritumoral features, the Adaboost model achieved the best area under the curve (AUC) of 0.91 and accuracy of 76.9% in the test cohort. Based on the optimal features and classifier, the model in the binary classification diagnosis achieves AUC of 0.98 (glioblastoma and lymphoma), 0.86 (lymphoma and metastases), and 0.70 (glioblastoma and metastases) in the test cohort, respectively. In conclusion, quantitative features from non-enhanced peritumoral regions (especially features from the 10-mm margin around the tumor) can provide additional information for the characterization of regional tumoral heterogeneity, which may offer potential value for future individualized assessment of patients with CNS tumors.

A Systematic Review of the Current Status and Quality of Radiomics for Glioma Differential Diagnosis

Simple Summary

Gliomas can be difficult to discern clinically and radiologically from other brain lesions (either neoplastic or non-neoplastic) since their clinical manifestations as well as preoperative imaging features often overlap and appear misleading. Radiomics could be extremely helpful for non-invasive glioma differential diagnosis (DDx). However, implementation in clinical practice is still distant and concerns have been raised regarding the methodological quality of radiomic studies. In this context, we aimed to summarize the current status and quality of radiomic studies concerning glioma DDx in a systematic review. In total, 42 studies were selected and examined in our work. Our study revealed that, despite promising and encouraging results, current studies on radiomics for glioma DDx still lack the quality required to allow its introduction into clinical practice. This work could provide new insights and help to reach a consensus on the use of the radiomic approach for glioma DDx.

Abstract

Radiomics is a promising tool that may increase the value of imaging in differential diagnosis (DDx) of glioma. However, implementation in clinical practice is still distant and concerns have been raised regarding the methodological quality of radiomic studies. Therefore, we aimed to systematically review the current status of radiomic studies concerning glioma DDx, also using the radiomics quality score (RQS) to assess the quality of the methodology used in each study. A systematic literature search was performed to identify original articles focused on the use of radiomics for glioma DDx from 2015. Methodological quality was assessed using the RQS tool. Spearman’s correlation (ρ) analysis was performed to explore whether RQS was correlated with journal metrics and the characteristics of the studies. Finally, 42 articles were selected for the systematic qualitative analysis. Selected articles were grouped and summarized in terms of those on DDx between glioma and primary central nervous system lymphoma, those aiming at differentiating glioma from brain metastases, and those based on DDx of glioma and other brain diseases. Median RQS was 8.71 out 36, with a mean RQS of all studies of 24.21%. Our study revealed that, despite promising and encouraging results, current studies on radiomics for glioma DDx still lack the quality required to allow its introduction into clinical practice. This work could provide new insights and help to reach a consensus on the use of the radiomic approach for glioma DDx.

An Update on Neurosurgical Management of Primary CNS Lymphoma in Immunocompetent Patients

Primary central nervous system lymphomas (PCNSL) are rare CNS tumors that harbor a conspicuously longer diagnostic delay compared to other malignant brain tumors. The gold standard for diagnosis is stereotactic biopsy to acquire tissue for histopathological analysis and therefore neurosurgery plays a central role when reducing the diagnostic period is mandated. However, histopathological diagnosis could be complicated if the patient was preoperatively exposed to corticosteroids. Besides the histopathological result, diagnosis of a PCNSL also requires full diagnostic workup to exclude cerebral metastatic disease of a systemic lymphoma. Most reviews of PCNSL discuss recent advancements in systemic treatment options from an (neuro-)oncologic viewpoint, whereas our intention was to discuss the optimization of the diagnostic period and therefore describe current standards of imaging, summarizing the diagnostic workup, discussing the surgical workup and future diagnostic prospects as well as the influence of preoperative corticosteroid therapy to reduce the diagnostic delay of PCNSL patients.

Machine Learning in Differentiating Gliomas from Primary CNS Lymphomas: A Systematic Review, Reporting Quality, and Risk of Bias Assessment

BACKGROUND

Differentiating gliomas and primary CNS lymphoma represents a diagnostic challenge with important therapeutic ramifications. Biopsy is the preferred method of diagnosis, while MR imaging in conjunction with machine learning has shown promising results in differentiating these tumors.

PURPOSE

Our aim was to evaluate the quality of reporting and risk of bias, assess data bases with which the machine learning classification algorithms were developed, the algorithms themselves, and their performance.

DATA SOURCES

Ovid EMBASE, Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Web of Science Core Collection were searched according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

STUDY SELECTION

From 11,727 studies, 23 peer-reviewed studies used machine learning to differentiate primary CNS lymphoma from gliomas in 2276 patients.

DATA ANALYSIS

Characteristics of data sets and machine learning algorithms were extracted. A meta-analysis on a subset of studies was performed. Reporting quality and risk of bias were assessed using the Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) and Prediction Model Study Risk Of Bias Assessment Tool.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.961) and accuracy (91.2%) in external validation were achieved by logistic regression and support vector machines models using conventional radiomic features. Meta-analysis of machine learning classifiers using these features yielded a mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.944 (95% CI, 0.898-0.99). The median TRIPOD score was 51.7%. The risk of bias was high for 16 studies.

LIMITATIONS

Exclusion of abstracts decreased the sensitivity in evaluating all published studies. Meta-analysis had high heterogeneity.

CONCLUSIONS

Machine learning-based methods of differentiating primary CNS lymphoma from gliomas have shown great potential, but most studies lack large, balanced data sets and external validation. Assessment of the studies identified multiple deficiencies in reporting quality and risk of bias. These factors reduce the generalizability and reproducibility of the findings.

Multiparametric MRI-Based Radiomics Model for Predicting H3 K27M Mutant Status in Diffuse Midline Glioma: A Comparative Study Across Different Sequences and Machine Learning Techniques

Objectives

The performance of multiparametric MRI-based radiomics models for predicting H3 K27M mutant status in diffuse midline glioma (DMG) has not been thoroughly evaluated. The optimal combination of multiparametric MRI and machine learning techniques remains undetermined. We compared the performance of various radiomics models across different MRI sequences and different machine learning techniques.

Methods

A total of 102 patients with pathologically confirmed DMG were retrospectively enrolled (27 with H3 K27M-mutant and 75 with H3 K27M wild-type). Radiomics features were extracted from eight sequences, and 18 feature sets were conducted by independent combination. There were three feature matrix normalization algorithms, two dimensionality-reduction methods, four feature selectors, and seven classifiers, consisting of 168 machine learning pipelines. Radiomics models were established across different feature sets and machine learning pipelines. The performance of models was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves with area under the curve (AUC) and compared with DeLong’s test.

Results

The multiparametric MRI-based radiomics models could accurately predict the H3 K27M mutant status in DMG (highest AUC: 0.807–0.969, for different sequences or sequence combinations). However, the results varied significantly between different machine learning techniques. When suitable machine learning techniques were used, the conventional MRI-based radiomics models shared similar performance to advanced MRI-based models (highest AUC: 0.875–0.915 vs. 0.807–0.926; DeLong’s test, p > 0.05). Most models had a better performance when generated with a combination of MRI sequences. The optimal model in the present study used a combination of all sequences (AUC = 0.969).

Conclusions

The multiparametric MRI-based radiomics models could be useful for predicting H3 K27M mutant status in DMG, but the performance varied across different sequences and machine learning techniques.

Beyond Glioma: The Utility of Radiomic Analysis for Non-Glial Intracranial Tumors

Simple Summary

Tumor qualities, such as growth rate, firmness, and intrusion into healthy tissue, can be very important for operation planning and further treatment. Radiomics is a promising new method that allows the determination of some of these qualities on images performed before surgery. In this article, we provide a review of the use of radiomics in various tumors of the central nervous system, such as metastases, lymphoma, meningioma, medulloblastoma, and pituitary tumors.

Abstract

The field of radiomics is rapidly expanding and gaining a valuable role in neuro-oncology. The possibilities related to the use of radiomic analysis, such as distinguishing types of malignancies, predicting tumor grade, determining the presence of particular molecular markers, consistency, therapy response, and prognosis, can considerably influence decision-making in medicine in the near future. Even though the main focus of radiomic analyses has been on glial CNS tumors, studies on other intracranial tumors have shown encouraging results. Therefore, as the main focus of this review, we performed an analysis of publications on PubMed and Web of Science databases, focusing on radiomics in CNS metastases, lymphoma, meningioma, medulloblastoma, and pituitary tumors.

AI-Driven Image Analysis in Central Nervous System Tumors-Traditional Machine Learning, Deep Learning and Hybrid Models

The interpretation of imaging in medicine in general and in oncology specifically remains problematic due to several limitations which include the need to incorporate detailed clinical history, patient and disease-specific history, clinical exam features, previous and ongoing treatment, and account for the dependency on reproducible human interpretation of multiple factors with incomplete data linkage. To standardize reporting, minimize bias, expedite management, and improve outcomes, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has gained significant prominence in imaging analysis. In oncology, AI methods have as a result been explored in most cancer types with ongoing progress in employing AI towards imaging for oncology treatment, assessing treatment response, and understanding and communicating prognosis. Challenges remain with limited available data sets, variability in imaging changes over time augmented by a growing heterogeneity in analysis approaches. We review the imaging analysis workflow and examine how hand-crafted features also referred to as traditional Machine Learning (ML), Deep Learning (DL) approaches, and hybrid analyses, are being employed in AI-driven imaging analysis in central nervous system tumors. ML, DL, and hybrid approaches coexist, and their combination may produce superior results although data in this space is as yet novel, and conclusions and pitfalls have yet to be fully explored. We note the growing technical complexities that may become increasingly separated from the clinic and enforce the acute need for clinician engagement to guide progress and ensure that conclusions derived from AI-driven imaging analysis reflect that same level of scrutiny lent to other avenues of clinical research.

Machine Learning-Based Radiomics in Neuro-Oncology

In the last decades, modern medicine has evolved into a data-centered discipline, generating massive amounts of granular high-dimensional data exceeding human comprehension. With improved computational methods, machine learning and artificial intelligence (AI) as tools for data processing and analysis are becoming more and more important. At the forefront of neuro-oncology and AI-research, the field of radiomics has emerged. Non-invasive assessments of quantitative radiological biomarkers mined from complex imaging characteristics across various applications are used to predict survival, discriminate between primary and secondary tumors, as well as between progression and pseudo-progression. In particular, the application of molecular phenotyping, envisioned in the field of radiogenomics, has gained popularity for both primary and secondary brain tumors. Although promising results have been obtained thus far, the lack of workflow standardization and availability of multicenter data remains challenging. The objective of this review is to provide an overview of novel applications of machine learning- and deep learning-based radiomics in primary and secondary brain tumors and their implications for future research in the field.