Therapeutic Cancer Vaccination With a Peptide Derived From the Calreticulin Exon 9 Mutations Induces Strong Cellular Immune Responses in Patients With CALR-Mutant Chronic Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Mutant Calreticulin in MPN: Mechanistic Insights and Therapeutic Implications

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

More than a decade following the discovery of Calreticulin (CALR) mutations as drivers of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), advances in the understanding of CALR-mutant MPN continue to emerge. Here, we summarize recent advances in mehanistic understanding and in targeted therapies for CALR-mutant MPN.

RECENT FINDINGS

Structural insights revealed that the mutant CALR-MPL complex is a tetramer and the mutant CALR C-terminus is exposed on the cell surface. Targeting mutant CALR utilizing antibodies is the leading therapeutic approach, while mutant CALR-directed vaccines are also in early clinical trials. Additionally, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells directed against mutant CALR are under evaluation in preclinical models. Approaches addressing the cellular effects of mutant CALR beyond MPL-JAK-STAT activation, such as targeting the unfolded protein response, proteasome, and N-glycosylation pathways, have been tested in preclinical models. In CALR-mutant MPN, the path from discovery to mechanistic understanding to direct therapeutic targeting has advanced rapidly. The longer-term goal remains clonally-selective therapies that modify the disease course in patients.

Shaping the Future of Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Therapy: Immune-Based Strategies and Targeted Innovations

Numerous cutting-edge immunotherapy approaches have been developed for hematological malignancies, such as immune-checkpoint inhibitors for lymphomas, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T-cell treatments for B-cell cancers, and monoclonal antibody therapies for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, achieving similar breakthroughs in MPNs has proven challenging. The key obstacles include the absence of universally expressed and MPN-specific surface markers, significant cellular and molecular variability among both individual patients and across different MPN subtypes, and the failure of treatments to stimulate an anti-tumor immune response due to the immune system disruptions caused by the myeloid neoplasm. Currently, there are several innovative therapies in clinical trials for MPNs. These include new JAK inhibitors with greater specificity for JAK2, as well as "add-on" medications designed to enhance the effectiveness of ruxolitinib, in both patients who are new to the drug and in those who have shown suboptimal responses. Additionally, there is ongoing exploration of novel therapeutic targets. In this review, we will explore the immunotherapy approaches that are currently used in clinical practice for MPNs, as well as emerging strategies that are likely to change the treatment of these diseases in the coming years.

What are the therapeutic options for previously treated myelofibrosis?

INTRODUCTION

The disruption of the JAK/STAT signaling pathway is a defining feature of myelofibrosis (MF). The introduction of JAK inhibitors (JAKi) has transformed the therapeutic approach to MF, becoming essential to treatment and reshaping the management landscape. While JAKi are now the preferred first-line treatment for most patients, various management options are available for those who do not respond to initial therapy.

AREAS COVERED

This review focuses on management options for patients with MF, with particular emphasis on therapeutic strategies following the failure of first-line JAKi. It provides a comprehensive overview of the current treatment landscape, including alternative JAKi and other approaches. The review is based on an extensive literature search using available databases (PubMed, Cochrane …) and relevant web resources (clinicaltrials.gov).

EXPERT OPINION

Ruxolitinib benefits in MF often diminish after 3-4 years, with complications like thrombocytopenia and anemia. Three newer JAKi offer alternatives with similar efficacy and varied side effects. Stem cell transplantation is a curative option for a minority, ideally timed at peak response to JAKi. Research aims to enhance first-line treatments and restore responses in resistant patients. Future therapies may include novel combinations or immunotherapies targeting specific mutations, requiring collaboration between patient, clinical, and pharmaceutical communities.

The CALR mutations enhance the expression of the immunosuppressive proteins GARP and LAP on peripheral blood lymphocytes through increased binding of activated platelets

Recently, an antibody which inhibits the glycoprotein A repetitions predominant (GARP)-mediated release of active transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ) from the TGFβ propeptide latency-associated peptide (LAP) showed preclinical activity in a murine model of the chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). Consequently, we investigated the expression of the immunosuppressive molecules LAP and GARP on peripheral blood lymphocytes from 56 MPN patients and 11 healthy donors (HD). We found that lymphocytes from patients with MPN express higher levels of LAP and GARP with no strong differences found between the different MPN diagnoses. The impact of clinical parameters on the expression of LAP and GARP by lymphocytes showed that patients with calreticulin (CALR)mut MPN have increased expression compared with HD and patients with the Januskinase2 (JAK2) mutation. The fraction of lymphocytes bound to activated platelets (aPLT) strongly correlate to LAP and GARP expression suggesting that it is not the lymphocytes themselves but aPLT, which confer the increased expression of GARP and LAP on MPN patient lymphocytes. Notably, no differences in neither platelet counts nor anti-thrombotic therapy was identified between patients with JAK2- and CALRmut patients. Analysis of platelet gene expression failed to identify differences in expression of relevant genes between JAK2- and CALRmut patients.

Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon

Essential thrombocythaemia (ET) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by an increased risk of vascular complications and a tendency to progress to myelofibrosis and acute leukaemia. ET patients have traditionally been stratified into two thrombosis risk categories based on age older than 60 years and a history of thrombosis. More recently, the revised IPSET-thrombosis scoring system, which accounts for the increased risk linked to the JAK2 mutation, has been incorporated into most expert recommendations. However, there is increasing evidence that the term ET encompasses different genomic entities, each with a distinct clinical course and prognosis. Moreover, the effectiveness and toxicity of cytoreductive and anti-platelet treatments differ depending on the molecular genotype. While anti-platelets and conventional cytoreductive agents, mainly hydroxycarbamide (hydroxyurea), anagrelide and pegylated interferon, remain the cornerstone of treatment, recent research has shed light on the effectiveness of novel therapies that may help improve outcomes. This comprehensive review focuses on the evolving landscape of treatment strategies in ET, with an emphasis on the role of molecular profiling in guiding therapeutic decisions. Besides evidence-based management according to revised IPSET-thrombosis stratification, we also provide specific observations for those patients with CALR-, MPL-mutated and triple-negative ET, as well as cases with high-risk mutations.

Antibody targeting of mutant calreticulin in myeloproliferative neoplasms

Mutations in calreticulin are one of the key disease-initiating mutations in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). In MPN, mutant calreticulin translates with a novel C-terminus that leads to aberrant binding to the extracellular domain of the thrombopoietin receptor, MPL. This cell surface neoantigen has become an attractive target for immunological intervention. Here, we summarize recent advances in the development of mutant calreticulin targeting antibodies as a novel therapeutic approach in MPN.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with CALR-mutated myelofibrosis: a study of the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of EBMT

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is curative for myelofibrosis (MF) but assessing risk-benefit in individual patients is challenging. This complexity is amplified in CALR-mutated MF patients, as they live longer with conventional treatments compared to other molecular subtypes. We analyzed outcomes of 346 CALR-mutated MF patients who underwent allo-HCT in 123 EBMT centers between 2005 and 2019. After a median follow-up of 40 months, the estimated overall survival (OS) rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 81%, 71%, and 63%, respectively. Patients receiving busulfan-containing regimens achieved a 5-year OS rate of 71%. Non-relapse mortality (NRM) at 1, 3, and 5 years was 16%, 22%, and 26%, respectively, while the incidence of relapse/progression was 11%, 15%, and 17%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that older age correlated with worse OS, while primary MF and HLA mismatched transplants had a near-to-significant trend to decreased OS. Comparative analysis between CALR- and JAK2-mutated MF patients adjusting for confounding factors revealed better OS, lower NRM, lower relapse, and improved graft-versus-host disease-free and relapse-free survival (GRFS) in CALR-mutated patients. These findings confirm the improved prognosis associated with CALR mutation in allo-HCT and support molecular profiling in prognostic scoring systems to predict OS after transplantation in MF.

Updates on accelerated and blast phase myeloproliferative neoplasms: Are we making progress?

Management approaches for accelerated and blast phase myeloproliferative neoplasms remain challenging for clinicians and patients alike. Despite many therapeutic advances, outcomes for those patients who are not allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplant eligible remain, in general, very poor. Estimated survival rates for such blast phase patients is frequently reported as less than 6 months. No specific immunological, genomic or clinicopathological signature currently exists that accurately predicts the risk and timing of transformation, which frequently induces a high degree of anxiety among patients and clinicians alike. Within this review article, we provide an up-to-date summary of current understanding of the underlying pathogenesis of accelerated and blast phase disease and discuss current therapeutic approaches and realistic outcomes. Finally, we discuss how the horizon may look with the introduction of more novel agents into the clinical arena.

Recent advances in therapies for primary myelofibrosis

Primary myelofibrosis (PMF), polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET) form the classical BCR-ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) that are driven by a constitutive activation of JAK2 signaling. PMF as well as secondary MF (post-ET and post-PV MF) are the most aggressive MPNs. Presently, there is no curative treatment, except allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. JAK inhibitors, essentially ruxolitinib, are the therapy of reference for intermediate and high-risk MF. However, presently the current JAK inhibitors behave mainly as anti-inflammatory drugs, improving general symptoms and spleen size without major impact on disease progression. A better understanding of the genetics of MF, the biology of its leukemic stem cells (LSCs), the mechanisms of fibrosis and of cytopenia and the role of inflammatory cytokines has led to new approaches with the development of numerous therapeutic agents that target epigenetic regulation, telomerase, apoptosis, cell cycle, cytokines and signaling. Furthermore, the use of a new less toxic form of interferon-α has been revived, as it is presently one of the only molecules that targets the mutated clone. These new approaches have different aims: (a) to provide alternative therapy to JAK inhibition; (b) to correct cytopenia; and (c) to inhibit fibrosis development. However, the main important goal is to find new disease modifier treatments, which will profoundly modify the progression of the disease without major toxicity. Presently the most promising approaches consist of the inhibition of telomerase and the combination of JAK2 inhibitors (ruxolitinib) with either a BCL2/BCL-xL or BET inhibitor. Yet, the most straightforward future approaches can be considered to be the development of and/or selective inhibition of JAK2V617F and the targeting MPL and calreticulin mutants by immunotherapy. It can be expected that the therapy of MF will be significantly improved in the coming years.

Pronounced gut microbiota signatures in patients with JAK2V617F-positive essential thrombocythemia

Essential thrombocythemia (ET) is part of the Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms. It is characterized by an increased risk of thromboembolic events and also to a certain degree hypermetabolic symptoms. The gut microbiota is an important initiator of hematopoiesis and regulation of the immune system, but in patients with ET, where inflammation is a hallmark of the disease, it is vastly unexplored. In this study, we compared the gut microbiota via amplicon-based 16S rRNA gene sequencing of the V3-V4 region in 54 patients with ET according to mutation status Janus-kinase 2 (JAK2V617F)-positive vs JAK2V617F-negative patients with ET, and in 42 healthy controls (HCs). Gut microbiota richness was higher in patients with ET (median-observed richness, 283.5; range, 75-535) compared with HCs (median-observed richness, 191.5; range, 111-300; P < 0.001). Patients with ET had a different overall bacterial composition (beta diversity) than HCs (analysis of similarities [ANOSIM]; R = 0.063, P = 0.004). Patients with ET had a significantly lower relative abundance of taxa within the Firmicutes phylum compared with HCs (51% vs 59%, P = 0.03), and within that phylum, patients with ET also had a lower relative abundance of the genus Faecalibacterium (8% vs 15%, P < 0.001), an important immunoregulative bacterium. The microbiota signatures were more pronounced in patients harboring the JAK2V617F mutation, and highly similar to patients with polycythemia vera as previously described. These findings suggest that patients with ET may have an altered immune regulation; however, whether this dysregulation is induced in part by, or is itself inducing, an altered gut microbiota remains to be investigated. IMPORTANCE Essential thrombocythemia (ET) is a cancer characterized by thrombocyte overproduction. Inflammation has been shown to be vital in both the initiation and progression of other myeloproliferative neoplasms, and it is well known that the gut microbiota is important in the regulation of our immune system. However, the gut microbiota of patients with ET remains uninvestigated. In this study, we characterized the gut microbiota of patients with ET compared with healthy controls and thereby provide new insights into the field. We show that the gut microbiota of patients with ET differs significantly from that of healthy controls and the patients with ET have a lower relative abundance of important immunoregulative bacteria. Furthermore, we demonstrate that patients with JAK2V617F-positive ET have pronounced gut microbiota signatures compared with JAK2V617F-negative patients. Thereby confirming the importance of the underlying mutation, the immune response as well as the composition of the microbiota.

The pharmacotherapeutic management of patients with myelofibrosis: looking beyond JAK inhibitors

INTRODUCTION

The approach to myelofibrosis (MF) has been revolutionized in recent years, overcoming the traditional therapies, often not very effective. Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi - from ruxolitinib up to momelotinib) were the first class of drugs with considerable results.

AREAS COVERED

Ongoing, new molecules are being tested that promise to give hope even to those patients not eligible for bone marrow transplants who become intolerant or are refractory to JAKi, for which therapeutic hopes are currently limited. Telomerase, murine double minute 2 (MDM2), phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase δ (PI3Kδ), BCL-2/xL, and bromodomain and extra-terminal motif (BET) inhibitors are the drugs with promising results in clinical trials and close to closure with consequent placing on the market, finally allowing JAK to look beyond. The novelty of the MF field was searched in the PubMed database, and the recently completed/ongoing trials are extrapolated from the ClinicalTrial website.

EXPERT OPINION

From this point of view, the use of new molecules widely described in this review, probably in association with JAKi, will represent the future treatment of choice in MF, leaving, in any case, the potential new approaches actually in an early stage of development, such as the use of immunotherapy in targeting CALR, which is coming soon.

Therapeutic cancer vaccination against mutant calreticulin in myeloproliferative neoplasms induces expansion of specific T cells in the periphery but specific T cells fail to enrich in the bone marrow

Background

Therapeutic cancer vaccination against mutant calreticulin (CALR) in patients with CALR-mutant (CALRmut) myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) induces strong T-cell responses against mutant CALR yet fails to demonstrate clinical activity. Infiltration of tumor specific T cells into the tumor microenvironment is needed to attain a clinical response to therapeutic cancer vaccination.

Aim

Determine if CALRmut specific T cells isolated from vaccinated patients enrich in the bone marrow upon completion of vaccination and explore possible explanations for the lack of enrichment.

Methods

CALRmut specific T cells from four of ten vaccinated patients were expanded, enriched, and analyzed by T-cell receptor sequencing (TCRSeq). The TCRs identified were used as fingerprints of CALRmut specific T cells. Bone marrow aspirations from the four patients were acquired at baseline and at the end of trial. T cells were enriched from the bone marrow aspirations and analyzed by TCRSeq to identify the presence and fraction of CALRmut specific T cells at the two different time points. In silico calculations were performed to calculate the ratio between transformed cells and effector cells in patients with CALRmut MPN.

Results

The fraction of CALRmut specific T cells in the bone marrow did not increase upon completion of the vaccination trial. In general, the T cell repertoire in the bone marrow remains relatively constant through the vaccination trial. The enriched and expanded CALRmut specific T cells recognize peripheral blood autologous CALRmut cells. In silico analyses demonstrate a high imbalance in the fraction of CALRmut cells and CALRmut specific effector T-cells in peripheral blood.

Conclusion

CALRmut specific T cells do not enrich in the bone marrow after therapeutic cancer peptide vaccination against mutant CALR. The specific T cells recognize autologous peripheral blood derived CALRmut cells. In silico analyses demonstrate a high imbalance between the number of transformed cells and CALRmut specific effector T-cells in the periphery. We suggest that the high burden of transformed cells in the periphery compared to the number of effector cells could impact the ability of specific T cells to enrich in the bone marrow.

Case Report: First longitudinal study of a patient with CALR positive clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential developing into pre-fibrotic myelofibrosis

Initial diagnosis of overt myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) represents the juncture during clonal evolution when symptoms or complications prompt an afflicted individual to seek medical attention. In 30-40% of the MPN subgroups essential thrombocythemia (ET) and myelofibrosis (MF), somatic mutations in the calreticulin gene (CALR) are drivers of the disease resulting in constitutive activation of the thrombopoietin receptor (MPL). In the current study, we describe a healthy CALR mutated individual during a 12 year follow-up from initial identification of CALR clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) to the diagnosis of pre-MF. The pre-diagnostic exponential development dynamics of the malignant clone demonstrated close correlation with the platelet counts, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte (NLR) ratio, and inversely correlated to hemoglobin and erythrocyte counts. Backward extrapolation of the growth rate indicated the potential for discovery of the malignant clone many years prior to presentation of overt disease, opening a window of opportunity for early treatment intervention. We did not find any additional mutations associated with MPNs and the current case report provides novel information regarding the development of a driver mutation and the association with blood cell counts prior to clinical manifestation of symptoms suggesting that pre-diagnostic dynamics may supplement future diagnostic criteria for early diagnosis and intervention in MPN patients.

Biology and therapeutic targeting of molecular mechanisms in MPNs

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorders characterized by activated Janus kinase (JAK)-signal transducer and activator of transcription signaling. As a result, JAK inhibitors have been the standard therapy for treatment of patients with myelofibrosis (MF). Although currently approved JAK inhibitors successfully ameliorate MPN-related symptoms, they are not known to substantially alter the MF disease course. Similarly, in essential thrombocythemia and polycythemia vera, treatments are primarily aimed at reducing the risk of cardiovascular and thromboembolic complications, with a watchful waiting approach often used in patients who are considered to be at a lower risk for thrombosis. However, better understanding of MPN biology has led to the development of rationally designed therapies, with the goal of not only addressing disease complications but also potentially modifying disease course. We review the most recent data elucidating mechanisms of disease pathogenesis and highlight emerging therapies that target MPN on several biologic levels, including JAK2-mutant MPN stem cells, JAK and non-JAK signaling pathways, mutant calreticulin, and the inflammatory bone marrow microenvironment.

Genetic basis and molecular profiling in myeloproliferative neoplasms

BCR::ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are clonal diseases originating from a single hematopoietic stem cell that cause excessive production of mature blood cells. The 3 subtypes, that is, polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and primary myelofibrosis (PMF), are diagnosed according to the World Health Organization (WHO) and international consensus classification (ICC) criteria. Acquired gain-of-function mutations in 1 of 3 disease driver genes (JAK2, CALR, and MPL) are the causative events that can alone initiate and promote MPN disease without requiring additional cooperating mutations. JAK2-p.V617F is present in >95% of PV patients, and also in about half of the patients with ET or PMF. ET and PMF are also caused by mutations in CALR or MPL. In ∼10% of MPN patients, those referred to as being "triple negative," none of the known driver gene mutations can be detected. The common theme between the 3 driver gene mutations and triple-negative MPN is that the Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK/STAT) signaling pathway is constitutively activated. We review the recent advances in our understanding of the early events after the acquisition of a driver gene mutation. The limiting factor that determines the frequency at which MPN disease develops with a long latency is not the acquisition of driver gene mutations, but rather the expansion of the clone. Factors that control the conversion from clonal hematopoiesis to MPN disease include inherited predisposition, presence of additional mutations, and inflammation. The full extent of knowledge of the mutational landscape in individual MPN patients is now increasingly being used to predict outcome and chose the optimal therapy.

Myelofibrosis

The clinical phenotype of primary and post-polycythemia vera and postessential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis (MF) is dominated by splenomegaly, symptomatology, a variety of blood cell alterations, and a tendency to develop vascular complications and blast phase. Diagnosis requires assessing complete cell blood counts, bone marrow morphology, deep genetic evaluations, and disease history. Driver molecular events consist of JAK2V617F, CALR, and MPL mutations, whereas about 8% to 10% of MF are "triple-negative." Additional myeloid-gene variants are described in roughly 80% of patients. Currently available clinical-based and integrated clinical/molecular-based scoring systems predict the survival of patients with MF and are applied for conventional treatment decision-making, indication to stem cell transplant (SCT) and allocation in clinical trials. Standard treatment consists of anemia-oriented therapies, hydroxyurea, and JAK inhibitors such as ruxolitinib, fedratinib, and pacritinib. Overall, spleen volume reduction of 35% or greater at week 24 can be achieved by 42% of ruxolitinib-, 47% of fedratinib-, 19% of pacritinib-, and 27% of momelotinib-treated patients. Now, it is time to move towards new paradigms for evaluating efficacy like disease modification, that we intend as a robust and unequivocal effect on disease biology and/or on patient survival. The growing number of clinical trials potentially pave the way for new strategies in patients with MF. Translational studies of some molecules showed an early effect on bone marrow fibrosis and on variant allele frequencies of myeloid genes. SCT is still the only curative option, however, it is associated with relevant challenges. This review focuses on the diagnosis, prognostication, and treatment of MF.

Effects of calreticulin mutations on cell transformation and immunity

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are cancers involving dysregulated production and function of myeloid lineage hematopoietic cells. Among MPNs, Essential thrombocythemia (ET), Polycythemia Vera (PV) and Myelofibrosis (MF), are driven by mutations that activate the JAK-STAT signalling pathway. Somatic mutations of calreticulin (CRT), an endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-localized lectin chaperone, are driver mutations in approximately 25% of ET and 35% of MF patients. The MPN-linked mutant CRT proteins have novel frameshifted carboxy-domain sequences and lack an ER retention motif, resulting in their secretion. Wild type CRT is a regulator of ER calcium homeostasis and plays a key role in the assembly of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules, which are the ligands for antigen receptors of CD8+ T cells. Mutant CRT-linked oncogenesis results from the dysregulation of calcium signalling in cells and the formation of stable complexes of mutant CRT with myeloproliferative leukemia (MPL) protein, followed by downstream activation of the JAK-STAT signalling pathway. The intricate participation of CRT in ER protein folding, calcium homeostasis and immunity suggests the involvement of multiple mechanisms of mutant CRT-linked oncogenesis. In this review, we highlight recent findings related to the role of MPN-linked CRT mutations in the dysregulation of calcium homeostasis, MPL activation and immunity.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions: Novel Therapeutic Strategies in Development for Myelofibrosis

Development of myelofibrosis (MF) therapeutics has reached fruition as the transformative impact of JAK2 inhibitors in the MPN landscape is complemented/expanded by a profusion of novel monotherapies and rational combinations in the frontline and second line settings. Agents in advanced clinical development span various mechanisms of action (eg, epigenetic or apoptotic regulation), may address urgent unmet clinical needs (cytopenias), increase the depth/duration of spleen and symptom responses elicited by ruxolitinib, improve other aspects of the disease besides splenomegaly/constitutional symptoms (eg, resistance to ruxolitinib, bone marrow fibrosis or disease course), provide personalized strategies, and extend overall survival (OS). Ruxolitinib had a dramatic impact on the quality of life and OS of MF patients. Recently, pacritinib received regulatory approval for severely thrombocytopenic MF patients. Momelotinib is advantageously poised among JAK inhibitors given its differentiated mode of action (suppression of hepcidin expression). Momelotinib demonstrated significant improvements in anemia measures, spleen responses, and MF-associated symptoms in MF patients with anemia; and will likely receive regulatory approval in 2023. An array of other novel agents combined with ruxolitinib, such as pelabresib, navitoclax, parsaclisib, or as monotherapies (navtemadlin) are evaluated in pivotal phase 3 trials. Imetelstat (telomerase inhibitor) is currently evaluated in the second line setting; OS was set as the primary endpoint, marking an unprecedented goal in MF trials, wherein SVR35 and TSS50 at 24 weeks have been typical endpoints heretofore. Transfusion independence may be considered another clinically meaningful endpoint in MF trials given its correlation with OS. Overall, therapeutics are at the cusp of an exponential expansion and advancements that will likely lead to the golden era in treatment of MF.

An arginase1- and PD-L1-derived peptide-based vaccine for myeloproliferative neoplasms: A first-in-man clinical trial

Introduction

Arginase-1 (ARG1) and Programed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) play a vital role in immunosuppression in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) and directly inhibit T-cell activation and proliferation. We previously identified spontaneous T-cell responses towards PD-L1 and ARG1 derived peptide epitopes in patients with MPNs. In the present First-in-Man study we tested dual vaccinations of ARG1- derived and PD-L1-derived peptides, combined with Montanide ISA-51 as adjuvant, in patients with Janus Kinase 2 (JAK2) V617F-mutated MPN.

Methods

Safety and efficacy of vaccination with ARG1- derived and PD-L1-derived peptides with montanide as an adjuvant was tested in 9 patients with MPN The primary end point was safety and toxicity evaluation. The secondary end point was assessment of the immune response to the vaccination epitope (www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT04051307).

Results

The study included 9 patients with JAK2-mutant MPN of which 8 received all 24 planned vaccines within a 9-month treatment period. Patients reported only grade 1 and 2 vaccine related adverse events. No alterations in peripheral blood counts were identified, and serial measurements of the JAK2V617F allelic burden showed that none of the patients achieved a molecular response during the treatment period. The vaccines induced strong immune responses against both ARG1 and PD-L1- derived epitopes in the peripheral blood of all patients, and vaccine-specific skin-infiltrating lymphocytes from 5/6 patients could be expanded in vitro after a delayed-type hypersensitivity test. In two patients we also detected both ARG1- and PD-L1-specific T cells in bone marrow samples at the end of trial. Intracellular cytokine staining revealed IFNγ and TNFγ producing CD4+- and CD8+- T cells specific against both vaccine epitopes. Throughout the study, the peripheral CD8/CD4 ratio increased significantly, and the CD8+ TEMRA subpopulation was enlarged. We also identified a significant decrease in PD-L1 mRNA expression in CD14+ myeloid cells in the peripheral blood in all treated patients and a decrease in ARG1 mRNA expression in bone marrow of 6 out of 7 evaluated patients.

Conclusion

Overall, the ARG1- and PD-L1-derived vaccines were safe and tolerable and induced strong T-cell responses in all patients. These results warrant further studies of the vaccine in other settings or in combination with additional immune-activating treatments.

Anti-PD-L1/PD-L2 therapeutic vaccination in untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients with unmutated IgHV

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients with unmutated immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgHV) are at risk of early disease progression compared to patients with mutated IgHV. As a preventive strategy, we treated 19 previously untreated CLL patients with unmutated IgHV in a phase 1/2 trial (clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03939234) exploring the efficacy and toxicity of a therapeutic cancer vaccine containing peptides derived from programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and ligand 2 (PD-L2), hoping to restore immunological control of the disease. According to the International Workshop on Chronic lymphocytic Leukemia (iwCLL) response criteria, no patients obtained a response; however, during follow-up, one patient had complete normalization of the peripheral lymphocyte count and remained in biochemical remission after a follow-up time of 15 months. At the end of treatment, one patient had progressed, and 17 patients had stable disease. During follow-up with a median time of 23.5 months since inclusion, seven patients had progressed, and eight patients had stable disease. The median time to first treatment (TTFT) from diagnosis was 90.3 months with a median follow-up time of 50.1 months. This apparent favorable outcome in TTFT needs to be investigated in a randomized setting, as our population may have been biased. More than 80% of patients obtained vaccine-specific immune responses, confirming the immunogenicity of the vaccine. The vaccine was generally well tolerated with only grade I-II adverse events. Although there were some signs of clinical effects, the vaccine seems to be insufficient as monotherapy in CLL, possibly due to a high tumor burden. The efficacy of the vaccine should preferably be tested in combination with novel targeted therapies or as a consolidating treatment.

Arginase-1 targeting peptide vaccine in patients with metastatic solid tumors - A phase I trial

BACKGROUND

Arginase-1-producing cells inhibit T cell-mediated anti-tumor responses by reducing L-arginine levels in the tumor microenvironment. T cell-facilitated elimination of arginase-1-expressing cells could potentially restore L-arginine levels and improve anti-tumor responses. The activation of arginase-1-specific T cells may convert the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and induce or strengthen local Th1 inflammation. In the current clinical study, we examined the safety and immunogenicity of arginase-1-based peptide vaccination.

METHODS

In this clinical phase I trial, ten patients with treatment-refractory progressive solid tumors were treated. The patients received an arginase-1 peptide vaccine comprising three 20-mer peptides from the ARG1 immunological "hot spot" region in combination with the adjuvant Montanide ISA-51. The vaccines were administered subcutaneously every third week (maximum 16 vaccines). The primary endpoint was to evaluate safety assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 4.0 and laboratory monitoring. Vaccine-specific immune responses were evaluated using enzyme-linked immune absorbent spot assays and intracellular cytokine staining on peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Clinical responses were evaluated using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1.

RESULTS

The vaccination was feasible, and no vaccine-related grade 3-4 adverse events were registered. Nine (90%) of ten patients exhibited peptide-specific immune responses in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Six (86%) of the seven evaluable patients developed a reactive T cell response against at least one of the ARG1 peptides during treatment. A phenotypic classification revealed that arginase-1 vaccine-specific T cells were both CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells. Two (20%) of ten patients obtained stable disease for respectively four- and seven months on vaccination treatment.

CONCLUSION

The peptide vaccine against arginase-1 was safe. Nine (90%) of ten patients had measurable peptide-specific responses in the periphery blood, and two (20%) of ten patients attained stable disease on protocol treatment.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03689192, identifier NCT03689192.

Perspective: Pivotal translational hematology and therapeutic insights in chronic myeloid hematopoietic stem cell malignancies

Despite much of the past 2 years being engulfed by the devastating consequences of the SAR-CoV-2 pandemic, significant progress, even breathtaking, occurred in the field of chronic myeloid malignancies. Some of this was show-cased at the 15th Post-American Society of Hematology (ASH) and the 25th John Goldman workshops on myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) held on 9th-10th December 2020 and 7th-10th October 2021, respectively. The inaugural Post-ASH MPN workshop was set out in 2006 by John Goldman (deceased) and Tariq Mughal to answer emerging translational hematology and therapeutics of patients with these malignancies. Rather than present a resume of the discussions, this perspective focuses on some of the pivotal translational hematology and therapeutic insights in these diseases.

Novel Therapies in Myelofibrosis: Beyond JAK Inhibitors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss the current treatment paradigm, review novel targets, and summarize completed and ongoing clinical trials that may lead to a paradigm shifts in the management of myelofibrosis (MF).

RECENT FINDINGS

In addition to the recent approval and ongoing late-stage development of multiple novel JAK inhibitors, recent clinical studies demonstrate therapeutic potential of targeting multiple alternate proteins and pathways including BET, MDM2, telomerase, BCL2, LSD1, PI3K, SMAC, and PTX2 in patients with MF. MF is a myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by clonal proliferation of myeloid cells and bone marrow fibrosis often causing cytopenias, extramedullary hematopoiesis resulting in hepatosplenomegaly, and increased pro-inflammatory cytokine production driving systemic symptoms. A significant proportion of morbidity and mortality is related to the propensity to transform to acute leukemia. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is the only curative therapy; however, due to the high associated mortality, this treatment is not an option for the majority of patients with MF. Currently, there are three targeted Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved therapies for MF which include ruxolitinib, fedratinib, and pacritinib, all part of the JAK inhibitor class. Many patients are unable to tolerate, do not respond, or develop resistance to existing therapies, leaving a large unmet medical need. In this review, we discuss the current treatment paradigm and novel therapies in development for the treatment of MF. We review the scientific rationale of each targeted pathway. We summarize updated clinical data and ongoing trials that may lead to FDA approval of these agents.

Impact of molecular profiling on the management of patients with myelofibrosis

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a chronic myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) characterized by a highly heterogeneous clinical course, which can be complicated by severe constitutional symptoms, massive splenomegaly, progressive bone marrow failure, cardiovascular events, and development of acute leukemia. Constitutive signaling through the JAK-STAT pathway plays a fundamental role in its pathogenesis, generally due to activating mutations of JAK2, CALR and MPL genes (i.e., the MPN driver mutations), present in most MF patients. Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) panel testing has shown that additional somatic mutations can already be detected at the time of diagnosis in more than half of patients, and that they accumulate along the disease course. These mutations, mostly affecting epigenetic modifiers or spliceosome components, may cooperate with MPN drivers to favor clonal dominance or influence the clinical phenotype, and some, such as high molecular risk mutations, correlate with a more aggressive clinical course with poor treatment response. The current main role of molecular profiling in clinical practice is prognostication, principally for selecting high-risk patients who may be candidates for transplantation, the only curative treatment for MF to date. To this end, contemporary prognostic models incorporating molecular data are useful tools to discriminate different risk categories. Aside from certain clinical situations, decisions regarding medical treatment are not based on patient molecular profiling, yet this approach may become more relevant in novel treatment strategies, such as the use of vaccines against the mutant forms of JAK2 or CALR, or drugs directed against actionable molecular targets.

Calreticulin mutant myeloproliferative neoplasms induce MHC-I skewing, which can be overcome by an optimized peptide cancer vaccine

The majority of JAK2V617F-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) have disease-initiating frameshift mutations in calreticulin (CALR), resulting in a common carboxyl-terminal mutant fragment (CALRMUT), representing an attractive source of neoantigens for cancer vaccines. However, studies have shown that CALRMUT-specific T cells are rare in patients with CALRMUT MPN for unknown reasons. We examined class I major histocompatibility complex (MHC-I) allele frequencies in patients with CALRMUT MPN from two independent cohorts. We observed that MHC-I alleles that present CALRMUT neoepitopes with high affinity are underrepresented in patients with CALRMUT MPN. We speculated that this was due to an increased chance of immune-mediated tumor rejection by individuals expressing one of these MHC-I alleles such that the disease never clinically manifested. As a consequence of this MHC-I allele restriction, we reasoned that patients with CALRMUT MPN would not efficiently respond to a CALRMUT fragment cancer vaccine but would when immunized with a modified CALRMUT heteroclitic peptide vaccine approach. We found that heteroclitic CALRMUT peptides specifically designed for the MHC-I alleles of patients with CALRMUT MPN efficiently elicited a CALRMUT cross-reactive CD8+ T cell response in human peripheral blood samples but not to the matched weakly immunogenic CALRMUT native peptides. We corroborated this effect in vivo in mice and observed that C57BL/6J mice can mount a CD8+ T cell response to the CALRMUT fragment upon immunization with a CALRMUT heteroclitic, but not native, peptide. Together, our data emphasize the therapeutic potential of heteroclitic peptide-based cancer vaccines in patients with CALRMUT MPN.

Management of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms in the Molecular Era: From Research to Practice

The 1960 discovery of the Philadelphia chromosome in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) marked the beginning of the modern genomic era of oncology. In the following years, the molecular underpinnings of CML were unraveled, culminating in the development of the first molecularly targeted therapy: imatinib. Imatinib revolutionized CML management, inducing deep molecular responses for most patients and aligning survival curves with those of age-matched control participants. Five additional tyrosine kinase inhibitors are now approved for CML: dasatinib, nilotinib, bosutinib, ponatinib, and asciminib (approved October 2021). The 2005 discovery of JAK2 mutations in myelofibrosis (MF) sparked enthusiasm that molecularly targeted therapies could have a similar impact in that disease. Three JAK inhibitors are now available for MF: ruxolitinib, fedratinib, and pacritinib (approved February 2022). JAK inhibitors are helpful for improving symptoms and splenomegaly but still only scratch the surface of MF pathophysiology. Clinical research testing novel agents, next-generation JAK inhibitors, and combinations of JAK inhibitors plus novel agents is moving at a tremendous pace in the hope that outcomes for patients with MF may mirror those with CML one day. This review provides an update on the status of clinical care and research for MF and addresses ongoing issues related to CML management.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions: Novel Therapies in Development for Myelofibrosis

Myeloproliferative neoplasms research has entered a dynamic and exciting era as we witness exponential growth of novel agents in advanced/early phase clinical trials for myelofibrosis (MF). Building on the success and pivotal role of ruxolitinib, many novel agents, spanning a wide range of mechanisms/targets (epigenetic regulation, apoptotic/intracellular signaling pathways, telomerase, bone marrow fibrosis) are in clinical development; several are studied in registrational trials and hold great potential to expand the therapeutic arsenal/shift the treatment paradigm if regulatory approval is granted. Insight into MF pathogenesis and its molecular underpinnings, preclinical studies demonstrating synergism of ruxolitinib with investigational agents, urgent unmet clinical needs (cytopenias, loss of response to JAK inhibitors); and progressive disease fueled the rapid rise of innovative therapeutics. New strategies include pairing ruxolitinib with erythroid maturation agents to manage anemia (luspatercept), designing rational combinations with ruxolitinib to boost responses in both the frontline and suboptimal response settings (pelabresib, navitoclax, parsaclisib), treatment with non-JAK inhibitor monotherapy in the second-line setting (navtemadlin, imetelstat), novel JAK inhibitors tailored to subgroups with challenging unmet needs (momelotinib and pacritinib for anemia and thrombocytopenia, respectively); and agents potentially enhancing longevity (imetelstat). Beyond typical endpoints evaluated in MF clinical trials (spleen volume reduction ≥ 35%, total symptom score reduction ≥ 50%) thus far, emerging endpoints include overall survival, progression-free survival, transfusion independence, anemia benefits, bone marrow fibrosis and driver mutation allele burden reduction. Novel biomarkers and additional clinical features are being sought to assess new agents and tailor emerging therapies to appropriate patients. New strategies are needed to optimize the design of clinical trials comparing novel combinations to standard agent monotherapy.

The immune landscape in BCR-ABL negative myeloproliferative neoplasms: inflammation, infections and opportunities for immunotherapy

Breakpoint cluster region-Abelson (BCR-ABL) negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are chronic myeloid neoplasms initiated by the acquisition of gene mutation(s) in a haematopoietic stem cell, leading to clonal expansion and over-production of blood cells and their progenitors. MPNs encompass a spectrum of disorders with overlapping but distinct molecular, laboratory and clinical features. This includes polycythaemia vera, essential thrombocythaemia and myelofibrosis. Dysregulation of the immune system is key to the pathology of MPNs, supporting clonal evolution, mediating symptoms and resulting in varying degrees of immunocompromise. Targeting immune dysfunction is an important treatment strategy. In the present review, we focus on the immune landscape in patients with MPNs - the role of inflammation in disease pathogenesis, susceptibility to infection and emerging strategies for therapeutic immune modulation. Further detailed work is required to delineate immune perturbation more precisely in MPNs to determine how and why vulnerability to infection differs between clinical subtypes and to better understand how inflammation results in a competitive advantage for the MPN clone. These studies may help shed light on new designs for disease-modifying therapies.

Progression of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (MPN): Diagnostic and Therapeutic Perspectives

Classical BCR-ABL-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are a heterogeneous group of hematologic malignancies, including essential thrombocythemia (ET), polycythemia vera (PV), and primary myelofibrosis (PMF), as well as post-PV-MF and post-ET-MF. Progression to more symptomatic disease, such as overt MF or acute leukemia, represents one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality. There are clinically evident but also subclinical types of MPN progression. Clinically evident progression includes evolution from ET to PV, ET to post-ET-MF, PV to post-PV-MF, or pre-PMF to overt PMF, and transformation of any of these subtypes to myelodysplastic neoplasms or acute leukemia. Thrombosis, major hemorrhage, severe infections, or increasing symptom burden (e.g., pruritus, night sweats) may herald progression. Subclinical types of progression may include increases in the extent of bone marrow fibrosis, increases of driver gene mutational allele burden, and clonal evolution. The underlying causes of MPN progression are diverse and can be attributed to genetic alterations and chronic inflammation. Particularly, bystander mutations in genes encoding epigenetic regulators or splicing factors were associated with progression. Finally, comorbidities such as systemic inflammation, cardiovascular diseases, and organ fibrosis may augment the risk of progression. The aim of this review was to discuss types and mechanisms of MPN progression and how their knowledge might improve risk stratification and therapeutic intervention. In view of these aspects, we discuss the potential benefits of early diagnosis using molecular and functional imaging and exploitable therapeutic strategies that may prevent progression, but also highlight current challenges and methodological pitfalls.

Novel therapeutics and targets in myelofibrosis

Myelofibrosis is a myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by clonal proliferation of myeloid cells, bone marrow fibrosis and cytopenias, extramedullary hematopoiesis and hepatosplenomegaly, increased pro-inflammatory cytokine production, and systemic symptoms. Patients with MF also have a propensity toward leukemic transformation. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHCT) is the only curative therapy for patients with MF; however, transplant-related morbidity and mortality precludes this option for the majority of patients. In the last decade, two targeted therapies have been approved for the treatment of MF, both JAK2 inhibitors, ruxolitinib and fedratinib. Despite the clinical efficacy of these two compounds in terms of splenomegaly and symptom burden reduction, there remain many areas of unmet need in the treatment of myelofibrosis. In this review, we discuss the limitations of currently approved treatment options and novel therapeutic targets with drug candidates in late-stage (phase II or III) clinical development for the treatment of MF. We delve into the mechanism of action and scientific rational of each candidate agent as well as the available clinical data, and ongoing trials that could lead to the approval of some of these novel therapies.

PD-1 inhibition in advanced myeloproliferative neoplasms

This is the first report demonstrating the safety and lack of efficacy of pembrolizumab treatment in patients with advanced MPNs.

Pembrolizumab was associated with changes in the immune milieu that could potentially support antitumor immunity in patients with advanced MPNs.

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a clonal stem cell neoplasm characterized by abnormal JAK-STAT signaling, chronic inflammation, cytopenias, and risk of transformation to acute leukemia. Despite improvements in the therapeutic options for patients with MF, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation remains the only curative treatment. We previously demonstrated multiple immunosuppressive mechanisms in patients with MF, including increased expression of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) on T cells compared with healthy controls. Therefore, we conducted a multicenter, open-label, phase 2, single-arm study of pembrolizumab in patients with Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System category of intermediate-2 or greater primary, post-essential thrombocythemia or post-polycythemia vera myelofibrosis that were ineligible for or were previously treated with ruxolitinib. The study followed a Simon 2-stage design and enrolled a total of 10 patients, 5 of whom had JAK2^V617mutation, 2 had CALR mutation, and 6 had additional mutations. Most patients were previously treated with ruxolitinib. Pembrolizumab treatment was well tolerated, but there were no objective clinical responses, so the study closed after the first stage was completed. However, immune profiling by flow cytometry, T-cell receptor sequencing, and plasma proteomics demonstrated changes in the immune milieu of patients, which suggested improved T-cell responses that can potentially favor antitumor immunity. The fact that these changes were not reflected in a clinical response strongly suggests that combination immunotherapeutic approaches rather than monotherapy may be necessary to reverse the multifactorial mechanisms of immune suppression in myeloproliferative neoplasms. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03065400.