Prognostic Value of Radiological Extranodal Extension Detected by Computed Tomography for Predicting Outcomes in Patients With Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancer Treated With Radical Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy

Lymph node or lymphoid aggregate? Impact on cancer resection quality, clinical prognosis, and tumor staging

The clinical outcome of most cancer patients depends on the stage of the primary tumor, the lymph node status, and if distant metastases are present. According to the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) and the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC), the Tumor Node Metastasis (TNM) classification of malignant tumors requires the examination of a minimum number of regional lymph nodes for each type of cancer to fulfill the criteria of high-quality surgical oncology. Due to the daily challenge of collecting an appropriate number of lymph nodes and time constraints when processing and assessing tissue samples, pathologists may be tempted to identify every histological lymphoid structure mimicking a lymph node as a "true" lymph node. Faced with this issue, we propose to resolve it by specifying histological characteristics to differentiate lymphoid aggregates from "true" lymph nodes. To find a minimum consensus, we suggest defining as lymph nodes only those lymphoid structures composed of lymphoid cells encapsulated by a complete or incomplete fibrous capsule.

Comprehensive Guide to Randomized Controlled Trials in Radiology: Everything You Need to Know

Evidence-based medicine integrates clinical research, personal expertise, and patient values. The most robust forms of clinical evidence, such as randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective studies, provide the strongest support for medical decision-making. RCTs are vital in radiology for evaluating new imaging technologies, contrast agents, and therapeutic procedures, despite challenges in translating preclinical findings to clinical practice. This guide discusses the history, principles, methodologies, and applications of RCTs in radiology, highlighting their role in advancing the field and supporting evidence-based practice.

The prognostic value of image-identified extranodal extension in laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinoma following definitive (chemo-)radiotherapy

OBJECTIVES

Clinical extranodal extension (cENE) is a cN modifier in TNM-8 for laryngo-hypopharygeal carcinoma (LHC). We hypothesize that image-detected ENE (iENE) can provide additional prognostic value over cENE in LHC.

METHODS

Baseline CTs/MRIs of cN+ LHC patients treated with definitive (chemo-)radiotherapy between 2010-2019 were re-reviewed by a neuroradiologist using internationally accepted criteria for iENE-positive/negative (iENE+/iENE-). Overall survival (OS) was compared by iENE status. Multivariable analysis (MVA) was performed to confirm the prognostic value of iENE, adjusted for known potential confounders.

RESULTS

A total of 232 LHC patients were identified, including 154 iENE-/cENE-, 60 iENE+/cENE-, and 18 iENE+/cENE+. A higher proportion of iENE+ (vs iENE-) patients had lymph node (LN) size > 3 cm [53 (67 %) vs 4 (3 %)], >=5 LNs [51 (65 %) vs 33 (21 %)], and retropharyngeal LN [12 (15 %) vs 6 (4 %)] (all p < 0.01). Median follow-up was 4.8 years. iENE+/cENE- and iENE+/cENE+patients had similarly low 5-year OS [28 % (18-44) and 29 % (13-63)] vs iENE-/cENE- [53 % (45-62)] (p < 0.001). On MVA, mortality risk was higher with iENE+vs iENE- [hazard ratio (HR) 2.22 (95 % CI 1.47-3.36)]. The prognostic value of iENE remained with MVA in larynx (n = 124) (HR 2.51 [1.35-4.68], p = 0.004] or hypopharynx (n = 108) (HR 1.87 [1.02-3.43], p = 0.04) patients, separately.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study confirms the independent prognostic importance of iENE for LHC following definitive (chemo-)radiotherapy beyond TNM-8 cN status that already contains the cENE parameter. Further research is needed to explore whether iENE could replace cENE for future cN classification.

Advances and residual knowledge gaps in the neck management of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients with advanced nodal disease undergoing definitive (chemo)radiotherapy for their primary

PURPOSE

Substantial changes have been made in the neck management of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) in the past century. These have been fostered by changes in cancer epidemiology and technological progress in imaging, surgery, or radiotherapy, as well as disruptive concepts in oncology. We aimed to review changes in nodal management, with a focus on HNSCC patients with nodal involvement (cN+) undergoing (chemo)radiotherapy.

METHODS

A narrative review was conducted to review current advances and address knowledge gaps in the multidisciplinary management of the cN+ neck in the context of (chemo)radiotherapy.

RESULTS

Metastatic neck nodes are associated with poorer prognosis and poorer response to radiotherapy, and have therefore been systematically treated by surgery. Radical neck dissection (ND) has gradually evolved toward more personalized and less morbid approaches, i.e., from functional to selective ND. Omission of ND has been made feasible by use of positron-emission tomography/computed tomography to monitor the radiation response in cN+ patients. Human papillomavirus-driven oropharyngeal cancers and their cystic nodes have shown dramatically better prognosis than tobacco-related cancers, justifying a specific prognostic classification (AJCC) creation. Finally, considering the role of lymph nodes in anti-tumor immunity, de-escalation of ND and prophylactic nodal irradiation in combination are intense areas of investigation. However, the management of bulky cN3 disease remains an issue, as aggressive multidisciplinary strategies or innovative combined treatments have not yet significantly improved their prognosis.

CONCLUSION

Personalized neck management is an increasingly important aspect of the overall therapeutic strategies in cN+ HNSCC.

Criteria for the diagnosis of extranodal extension detected on radiological imaging in head and neck cancer: Head and Neck Cancer International Group consensus recommendations

Extranodal extension of tumour on histopathology is known to be a negative prognostic factor in head and neck cancer. Compelling evidence suggests that extranodal extension detected on radiological imaging is also a negative prognostic factor. Furthermore, if imaging detected extranodal extension could be identified reliably before the start of treatment, it could be used to guide treatment selection, as patients might be better managed with non-surgical approaches to avoid the toxicity and cost of trimodality therapy (surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy together). There are many aspects of imaging detected extranodal extension that remain unresolved or are without consensus, such as the criteria to best diagnose them and the associated terminology. The Head and Neck Cancer International Group conducted a five-round modified Delphi process with a group of 18 international radiology experts, representing 14 national clinical research groups. We generated consensus recommendations on the terminology and diagnostic criteria for imaging detected extranodal extension to harmonise clinical practice and research. These recommendations have been endorsed by 19 national and international organisations, representing 34 countries. We propose a new classification system to aid diagnosis, which was supported by most of the participating experts over existing systems, and which will require validation in the future. Additionally, we have created an online educational resource for grading imaging detected extranodal extensions.

Extranodal extension in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: need for accurate pretherapeutic staging to select optimum treatment and minimize toxicity

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In 2017, the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) introduced the inclusion of extracapsular nodal extension (ENE) into the N staging of nonviral head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), while retaining the traditional N classification based on the number and sizes of metastatic nodes. The extent of ENE was further defined as microscopic ENE (ENEmi) and major ENE (ENEma) based on extent of disease beyond the nodal capsule (≤ or > 2 mm). This article reviews the evidence and progress made since these changes were introduced.

RECENT FINDINGS

The 'gold standard' for evaluation ENE is histopathologic examination, the current preferred primary treatment of patients with HNSCC is by radiation-based therapy ± chemotherapy or biotherapy. The current pretreatment staging is by imaging, which needs improved reliability of radiologic rENE assessment with reporting needs to consider both sensitivity and specificity (currently computed tomography images have high-specificity but low-sensitivity). Adjuvant chemotherapy is indicated for patients with ENEma to enhance disease control, whereas for patients with ENEmi, there is a need to assess the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy. Evidence that the presence of pENE in HPV-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma is an independent prognostic factor and should be considered for inclusion in future AJCC editions has recently emerged.

SUMMARY

There remains a paucity of data on the reliability of imaging in the staging of rENE, more so the for the accurate assessment of ENEmi. Optimistic early results from use of artificial intelligence/deep learning demonstrate progress and may pave the way for better capabilities in tumor staging, treatment outcome prediction, resulting in improved survival outcomes.

Definitive Radiotherapy in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancer with Clinical Extranodal Extension

Purpose

The extranodal extension (ENE) in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is a potential poor prognostic factor. Clinical ENE (cENE) was incorporated in the HNSCC staging system in the 8th edition of AJCC. There is not much evidence to support the treatment of HNSCC with cN3b with radiotherapy in radical intent. This study aims to assess the treatment outcome in patients of HNSCC with cN3b disease treated with definitive radiotherapy.

Method

Forty-five HNSCC patients with cN3b disease treated with definitive radiotherapy with or without concurrent chemotherapy between January 2018 to December 2018 were retrospectively evaluated.

Results

The median age of the study patients was 60 years (40-75years). Only 35 patients (77.8%) could complete the prescribed course of treatment, and the leading common cause of non-completion was treatment-related toxicities. After a median follow-up period of 9.3 months (range 2-33), the median OS and PFS were 22.6 months and 7.2 months, respectively. Fourteen patients (31.1%) in our study developed grade III/IV mucositis, and 11 (24.4%) developed severe grade III/IV dermatitis. The locoregional failure constituted 24 patients (53.3%).

Conclusion

The treatment outcome of HNSCC with cN3b disease is inferior. A personalized and subjective approach should be undertaken before choosing radiotherapy with a radical intent in this group of patients.

Free-Breathing StarVIBE Sequence for the Detection of Extranodal Extension in Head and Neck Cancer: An Image Quality and Diagnostic Performance Study

(1) Background: This study aims to evaluate the image quality of abnormal cervical lymph nodes in head and neck cancer and the diagnostic performance of detecting extranodal extension (ENE) using free-breathing StarVIBE. (2) Methods: In this retrospective analysis, 80 consecutive head and neck cancer patients underwent StarVIBE before neck dissection at an academic center. Image quality was compared with conventional VIBE available for 28 of these patients. A total of 73 suspicious metastatic lymph nodes from 40 patients were found based on morphology and enhancement pattern on StarVIBE. Sensitivity (SN), specificity (SP), and odds ratios were calculated for each MR feature from StarVIBE to predict pathologic ENE. (3) Results: StarVIBE showed significantly superior image quality, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) for enlarged lymph nodes compared to VIBE. The MR findings of "invading adjacent planes" (SN, 0.54; SP, 1.00) and "matted nodes" (SN, 0.72; SP, 0.89) emerged as notable observations. The highest diagnostic performance was attained by combining these two features (SN, 0.93; SP, 0.89). (4) Conclusions: This study confirms that StarVIBE offers superior image quality for abnormal lymph nodes compared to VIBE, and it can accurately diagnose ENE by utilizing a composite MR criterion in head and neck cancer.

Response assessment of post-treatment head and neck cancers to determine further management using NI-RADS (Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System): a subgroup analysis of a randomized controlled trial

Objective

Interpreting complex post-treatment changes in head and neck cancer (HNC) is challenging with further added perplexity due to variable interobserver interpretation and hence evolved the NI-RADS lexicon. We evaluated the accuracy of NI-RADS in predicting disease status on 1st post-treatment follow-up CECT in a homogenous cohort of those who received only chemoradiation.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of imaging was done for LASHNC patients who received radical chemoradiation in an open-label, investigator-initiated, phase 3 randomized trial (2012-2018) randomly assigned to either radical radiotherapy with concurrent weekly cisplatin (CRT) or CRT with the same schedule plus weekly nimotuzumab (NCRT). 536 patients were accrued, and 74 patients who did not undergo PET/CECT after 8 weeks post-CRT were excluded. After assessing 462 patients for eligibility to allocate NI-RADS at primary and node sites, 435 cases fell in the Primary disease cohort and 412 cases in the Node disease cohort. We evaluated sensitivity, disease prevalence, the positive and negative predictive value of the NI-RADS lexicon, and accuracy, which were expressed as percentages. We also prepared flow charts to determine concordance with allocated NI-RADS category and established accuracy with which it can identify disease status.

Results

Out of 435 primary disease cohort, 92%, 55%, 48%,70% were concordant and had 100%, 72%, 70%, 82% accuracy in NI-RADS1 (n=12), NI-RADS2 (n=261), NIRADS3 (n=105), and NI-RADS 4 (n=60) respectively. Out of 412 nodes disease cohort, 95%, 90%, 48%, 70%were concordant and had 92%, 97%, 90%, 67% accuracy in NI-RADS1 (n=57), NI-RADS2 (n=255), NI-RADS3 (n=105) and NI-RADS4 (n=60) respectively. % concordance of PET/CT and CECT across all primary and node disease cohorts revealed that PET/CT was 91% concordant in primary NI-RADS2 as compared to 55% concordance of CECT whereas concordance of CECT was better with 57% in primary NI-RADS3 cohort as compared to PET/CT concordance of 41%.

Conclusion

The accuracy with which the NI-RADS lexicon performed in our study at node sites was better than that at the primary site. There is a great scope of research to understand if CECT performs better over clinical disease status in NI-RADS 3 and 4 categories. Further research should be carried out to understand if PET/CECT can be used for close interval follow-up in stage III/IV NI-RADS 2 cases.

Diagnostic challenges and prognostic implications of extranodal extension in head and neck cancer: a state of the art review and gap analysis

Extranodal extension (ENE) is a pattern of cancer growth from within the lymph node (LN) outward into perinodal tissues, critically defined by disruption and penetration of the tumor through the entire thickness of the LN capsule. The presence of ENE is often associated with an aggressive cancer phenotype in various malignancies including head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). In HNSCC, ENE is associated with increased risk of distant metastasis and lower rates of locoregional control. ENE detected on histopathology (pathologic ENE; pENE) is now incorporated as a risk-stratification factor in human papillomavirus (HPV)-negative HNSCC in the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) and the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) TNM classification. Although ENE was first described almost a century ago, several issues remain unresolved, including lack of consensus on definitions, terminology, and widely accepted assessment criteria and grading systems for both pENE and ENE detected on radiological imaging (imaging-detected ENE; iENE). Moreover, there is conflicting data on the prognostic significance of iENE and pENE, particularly in the context of HPV-associated HNSCC. Herein, we review the existing literature on ENE in HNSCC, highlighting areas of controversy and identifying critical gaps requiring concerted research efforts.

Imaging of Neck Nodes in Head and Neck Cancers - a Comprehensive Update

Cervical lymph node metastases from head and neck squamous cell cancers significantly reduce disease-free survival and worsen overall prognosis and, hence, deserve more aggressive management and follow-up. As per the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging manual, extranodal extension, especially in human papillomavirus-negative cancers, has been incorporated in staging as it is important in deciding management and significantly impacts the outcome of head and neck squamous cell cancer. Lymph node imaging with various radiological modalities, including ultrasound, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, has been widely used, not only to demonstrate nodal involvement but also for guided histopathological evaluation and therapeutic intervention. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, together with positron emission tomography, are used widely for the follow-up of treated patients. Finally, there is an emerging role for artificial intelligence in neck node imaging that has shown promising results, increasing the accuracy of detection of nodal involvement, especially normal-appearing nodes. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of the diagnosis and management of involved neck nodes with a focus on sentinel node anatomy, pathogenesis, imaging correlates (including radiogenomics and artificial intelligence) and the role of image-guided interventions.

Advanced Techniques in Head and Neck Cancer Imaging: Guide to Precision Cancer Management

Precision treatment requires precision imaging. With the advent of various advanced techniques in head and neck cancer treatment, imaging has become an integral part of the multidisciplinary approach to head and neck cancer care from diagnosis to staging and also plays a vital role in response evaluation in various tumors. Conventional anatomic imaging (CT scan, MRI, ultrasound) remains basic and focuses on defining the anatomical extent of the disease and its spread. Accurate assessment of the biological behavior of tumors, including tumor cellularity, growth, and response evaluation, is evolving with recent advances in molecular, functional, and hybrid/multiplex imaging. Integration of these various advanced diagnostic imaging and nonimaging methods aids understanding of cancer pathophysiology and provides a more comprehensive evaluation in this era of precision treatment. Here we discuss the current status of various advanced imaging techniques and their applications in head and neck cancer imaging.