Goblet Cell Adenocarcinoma of the Appendix: A Systematic Review and Incidence and Survival of 1,225 Cases From an English Cancer Registry

Predictors of Recurrence in Nonmetastatic Appendiceal Epithelial Cancers: An Updated Single-Center Experience Over 25 Years

BACKGROUND

Appendiceal epithelial tumors are rare and encompass a broad set of adenocarcinoma histologies, including mucinous (mAC), colonic-type (cAC), and goblet cell (GCA) adenocarcinomas. It has previously been reported that nodal disease predicted recurrence in patients with nonmetastatic appendiceal adenocarcinomas, supporting diagnostic laparoscopy with right hemicolectomy for staging and assessment for risk of recurrence. In this update, we sought to identify predictors of nodal disease on initial diagnostic pathology in nonmetastatic adenocarcinomas.

METHODS

Patients with nonmetastatic appendiceal adenocarcinoma at a single institution from 1994 to 2020 were included. Clinicopathologic characteristics that predict recurrence and lymph node metastasis were analyzed. Workup included staging laparoscopy with right hemicolectomy, seriel imaging and biochemical monitoring.

RESULTS

A total of 147 patients with mAC (18%), cAC (22%), and GCAs (59%) were included. After median follow-up of 53 months, 23 (16%) patients recurred, most commonly in the peritoneal cavity (17/23, 74%). Recurrence rates were higher among node-positive patients (59% vs. 5%, P < 0.001). Nodal disease was more common in mAC (27%) and cAC (37%) than in GCA (11%); however, adenocarcinoma grade was not associated with nodal involvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Nodal metastasis was more common in mAC and cAC compared with GCA and was the only significant predictor of recurrence in appendix cancer.

[Appendiceal goblet cell adenocarcinoma: Has the controversy come to an end?]

In 2019, the 5th edition of the WHO classification of digestive tumours has retained the terminology "goblet cell adenocarcinoma" (GCA) to designate a tumour whose amphicrine nature owed it more than ten denominations since its initial description among which the most tenacious "goblet cell carcinoid" is no longer recommended today. This rare tumour represents 15-19% of appendicular tumours. Its incidence is rising. The positive diagnosis is based on morphological examination and mandatory identification of a low-grade component of glands comprising goblet cells stained by PAS and Alcian blue. The appendix must be entirely examined. Global tumour grade (low, intermediate, high) is based on the proportions of low-grade and high-grade components. This tumour's immunohistochemical profile is particular because of expression of CK20 and often CK7 as well as neuroendocrine markers. It is often an incidental finding on a surgical specimen, among individuals aged 50 or more years, presenting with a locally advanced stage with vascular and perineural invasion. Lymph node metastases are present in a third of cases. Non-specific mutations of ARID1A and genes of the Wnt pathway may be identified. GCA is not associated with microsatellite instability or Lynch syndrome. Its prognosis is intermediate. Surgery is the reference therapy based on the stage. The main differential diagnoses are colorectal adenocarcinoma NOS, mucinous adenocarcinoma and signet ring cell adenocarcinoma. Patients are referred to the RENAPE expert network.

Mutational Features and Tumor Microenvironment Alterations in High-Grade Appendiceal Cancers Treated With Iterative Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy

PURPOSE

High-grade appendiceal adenocarcinomas (HGAA) with peritoneal metastases (PMs) are associated with poor survival. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a novel treatment approach for unresectable HGAA-PM. However, its influence on immunogenomic profiles has not yet been fully explored.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We obtained 79 samples of metastatic peritoneal tumor deposits from patients diagnosed with HGAA and performed whole-exome sequencing, RNA sequencing, and immunoprofiling before and after HIPEC. Tumor biopsies were subjected to immunogenomic profiling to detect mutational signatures and immune populations associated with oncologic outcomes.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients with HGAA-PMs were included in the study. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.7 months (2.7-25.3) and the median overall survival was 11.4 months (4.7-42). Mucin-associated genes (MUC16, MUC3A, and MUC5AC) and titin (TTN) had the highest mutation frequencies. Mutational signatures such as single-base substitution 29 and doublet-base substitution 11 were present in >50% of single-base and double-base mutations. Higher PD-L1 coexpression on CD8+ T cells demonstrated a higher PFS both intratumorally (P = .019) and at the margin (P = .025).

CONCLUSION

HIPEC-associated mutational signatures were identified in HGAA-PMs. Elevated PD-L1+ cytotoxic T-cell populations after HIPEC had better PFS, offering valuable insights for prognostication in the context of HIPEC treatment.

The Optimal Approach to Surgical Management of Goblet Cell Carcinoid of the Appendix: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Goblet cell carcinoid (GCC) is a rare and poorly understood appendiceal neoplasm, exhibiting mixed histological and aggressive clinical features. Current guidelines recommend right hemicolectomy in all cases, although there is conflicting evidence that appendicectomy alone may be sufficient. This review aims to identify the optimal surgical management for appendiceal GCC.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed by searching MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials. Randomised controlled trials, cohort studies or large case series (>5 patients) reporting clinical outcomes for patients undergoing surgical management of GCC of the appendix were included. Outcomes extracted included participant and tumour characteristics, type of surgery and survival data.

RESULTS

A total of 1341 studies were retrieved. After duplicate removal, 796 titles were screened for relevance prior to abstract and full text review. A total of six studies were included for analysis, comprising 3177 patients-1629 females and 1548 males. The median age ranged from 51 to 72 years. A total of 2329 patients underwent right hemicolectomy, while 824 were treated with appendicectomy only. Overall, the included studies report increased survival in patients undergoing right hemicolectomy compared to appendicectomy alone. A meta-analysis was not possible due to insufficient data reported in the published literature to date.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no consensus regarding the optimal surgical management of appendiceal GCC, as outcomes-based data comparing surgical interventions are lacking. It is possible that some patients with favourable features are overtreated. The absence of robust evidence to support a more conservative approach means that right hemicolectomy remains the standard of care for all patients, in keeping with current international guidelines. The rarity of this condition and limited data in the published studies remain barriers to evidence-based best clinical practice.

Case report: A rare case of coexistence of low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasia and goblet cell adenocarcinoma in the appendix

Background

Primary appendiceal tumors are rare. Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasia (LAMN) and goblet cell adenocarcinoma (GCA) account for 20% and 14% of primary appendiceal tumors, respectively. The coexistence of LAMN and GCA is an extremely rare event. This report presents a case of an elderly male patient with an appendiceal tumor composed of LAMN and GCA in the same appendix.

Case presentation

A 72-year-old male patient was admitted to our institution presenting with a history of abdominal pain localized to the right lower quadrant for two months. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) showed a large dilated thickened cystic mass in the appendix, along with a small duodenal diverticulum. Laboratory tests indicated elevated levels of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cancer antigen 199 (CA19-9) markers. The patient underwent a laparoscopic right hemicolectomy and exploration of the duodenal diverticulum, and there was no finding of perforation of the duodenal diverticulum. Focal positivity for chromogranin A (CgA) and synaptophysin (Syn) was observed in the tumor cells of GCA. The final pathological diagnosis revealed the coexistence of LAMN staged pT4a and grade 1 GCA staged pT3 in the appendix. Unfortunately, the patient died due to severe septic shock and circulatory failure secondary to a perforated duodenal diverticulum.

Conclusions

The coexistence of LAMN and GCA are extremely rare in the appendix and may result from the proliferation of two independent cellular lines. The coexistence of distinct neoplasms poses diagnostic and management challenges. Multidisciplinary team discussion may be essential in the effective management of these patients.

A rare goblet cell adenocarcinoma arising from Barrett's esophagus: the first reported case in the esophagus

Goblet cell adenocarcinoma (GCA) is a rare and distinctive amphicrine tumor comprised of goblet-like mucinous cells and neuroendocrine cells. It is believed to originate from pluripotent stem cells located at the base of crypts. GCA predominantly arises from the appendix, with a few reported cases in extra-appendiceal locations such as the colorectum, small intestine, and stomach. In this case report, we present a unique instance of a 64-year-old male who initially received a diagnosis of neuroendocrine carcinoma in the distal esophagus based on biopsy but, following resection, was subsequently re-diagnosed with GCA arising from Barrett's esophagus.

Current Status of Treatment among Patients with Appendiceal Tumors-Old Challenges and New Solutions?

The 5th edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of tumors of the digestive system distinguishes four categories of appendiceal tumors (ATs): serrated lesions and polyps, mucinous neoplasms, adenocarcinomas, and neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). The differential diagnosis of ATs can be challenging in medical practice, due to their rarity and lack of data from randomized controlled trials on a large, diverse group of patients. ATs are usually noted in specimens obtained during appendectomies due to clinical acute appendicitis. In the European population, most ATs (65%) occur over the age of 50 and among women (56.8%). According to histological type, 54.6% are neuroendocrine tumors (NETs); 26.8% cystic, mucinous, and serous neoplasms; and 18.6% adenocarcinoma not otherwise specified (NOS). On pathologic analysis, most AT findings are benign lesions or small NENs that do not require further therapeutic measures. The presence of appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (AMN) can lead to pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP). While the multimodal treatment for abdominal malignancies has evolved over the past several decades, the clinical workup and treatment of ATs remain a challenge. Therefore, this review aims to describe the diagnostic possibilities, molecular-based diagnosis, staging, differences in the treatment process, and prognostic factors associated with ATs.

Appendiceal Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: an Update for 2023

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarize the literature from the last 5 years on treatment of appendiceal neuroendocrine neoplasms (aNEN). Furthermore, to evaluate the prognostic significance of lymph node metastases, indications for adjuvant treatment, and challenges of the current follow-up regimen.

RECENT FINDINGS

Simple appendectomy is sufficient in tumors < 1 cm while extended surgery is indicated in tumors > 2 cm. In a multicenter study of aNENs measuring 1-2 cm, extended surgery offered no significant prognostic advantage and is now limited to incomplete tumor resection or high-grade G2 or G3 aNEN. Follow-up remains debatable, as the use of imaging and biomarkers lacks validation. While surgical procedure is well established in aNEN tumors < 1 cm and > 2 cm, the need for extended surgery in aNEN tumors 1-2 cm is questionable. Future studies should address the prognostic impact of lymph node metastases and the optimal design and duration of follow-up.

Gastric Amphicrine Carcinoma Showing Neuroendocrine and Pancreatic Acinar Cell Differentiation. Lesson from a Challenging Case Opening New Perspectives in the Diagnostic Work-Up of Gastric Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Amphicrine carcinomas are epithelial neoplasms composed of cells with co-existing exocrine-neuroendocrine phenotype and are challenging lesions from both diagnostic and therapeutic perspectives.Here, we report the case of a 63-year-old male patient with a gastric nodule that was endoscopically biopsied, revealing histological features of a type 3 well-differentiated gastric neuroendocrine tumor (NET). At imaging, the lesion was single and limited to the stomach, but did not present In-111Octreotide uptake, despite SSTR2A immunohistochemical expression. The patient underwent a wedge resection of the gastric wall, with a final pathological diagnosis of amphicrine carcinoma with pancreatic acinar cell and neuroendocrine features (pT1b). Predictive immunohistochemistry showed microsatellite stability and negative HER2 status. Hotspot targeted deep sequencing of 57 genes showed no somatic mutation, in agreement with the low mutational burden reported for gastric amphicrine carcinomas. Due to a low stage of the tumor and the poor performance status of the patient, no additional oncological treatment was administered. The patient was disease-free after 18 months.This unusual case highlights the importance of considering amphicrine carcinoma in the diagnostic work-up of gastric type 3 NET. This can be done by including in the immunohistochemical panel non-neuroendocrine markers, such as the pancreatic acinar cell and glandular ones. Correct pathological diagnosis is pivotal to determine the appropriate staging (NET vs exocrine one) for surgical and oncological management.

Recurrent gastric amphicrine tumor with neuroendocrine and pancreatic acinar cell differentiation and somatic MEN1 inactivation arisen during immunotherapy

Amphicrine neoplasms (ANs) are poorly understood epithelial malignancies composed of cells with co-existing exocrine-neuroendocrine features. Here, we report a recurrent mucin-producing gastric amphicrine tumor co-expressing neuroendocrine (chromogranin-A, synaptophysin, and CD56) and pancreatic acinar cell (BCL10 and trypsin) markers, arisen in a 64-year-old woman during adjuvant immunotherapy for melanoma. Ki-67 was < 2%. The gastric background context was atrophic gastritis. Next-generation sequencing showed MEN1 mutation (p.P71fs*42) coupled with loss of heterozygosity. The key lessons were as follows: (1) gastric ANs can show the co-existence of exocrine mucin-producing elements with neuroendocrine and pancreatic acinar differentiation; (2) they may represent a new entity arising in the context of atrophic gastritis and during immunotherapy; (3) they should be considered in the diagnostic workup of gastric neuroendocrine tumors; and (4) their molecular profile can show striking similarities with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors. These findings may be of help to improve the knowledge and the biological taxonomy of ANs.

Neoplasms of the Appendix

BACKGROUND

Neoplasms of the vermiform appendix are rare. They comprise a heterogeneous group of entities requiring differentkinds of treatment.

METHODS

This review is based on publications retrieved by a selective literature search in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochranedatabases.

RESULTS

0.5% of all tumors of the gastrointestinal tract arise in the appendix. Their treatment depends on their histopathologicalclassification and tumor stage. The mucosal epithelium gives rise to adenomas, sessile serrated lesions, adenocarcinomas,goblet-cell adenocarcinomas, and mucinous neoplasms. Neuroendocrine neoplasms originate in neuroectodermal tissue. Adenomasof the appendix can usually be definitively treated by appendectomy. Mucinous neoplasms, depending on their tumorstage, may require additional cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemoperfusion (HIPEC). Adeno -carcinomas and goblet-cell adenocarcinomas can metastasize via the lymphatic vessels and the bloodstream and should thereforebe treated by oncological right hemicolectomy. Approximately 80% of neuroendocrine tumors are less than 1 cm in diameterwhen diagnosed and can therefore be adequately treated by appendectomy; right hemicolectomy is recommended if the patienthas risk factors for metastasis via the lymphatic vessels. Systemic chemotherapy has not been shown to be beneficial forappendiceal neoplasms in prospective, randomized trials; it is recommended for adenocarcinomas and goblet-cell adenocarcinomasof stage III or higher, in analogy to the treatment of colorectal carcinoma.

The Promise of Epigenetics Research in the Treatment of Appendiceal Neoplasms

Appendiceal cancers (AC) are a rare and heterogeneous group of malignancies. Historically, appendiceal neoplasms have been grouped with colorectal cancers (CRC), and treatment strategies have been modeled after CRC management guidelines due to their structural similarities and anatomical proximity. However, the two have marked differences in biological behavior and treatment response, and evidence suggests significant discrepancies in their respective genetic profiles. In addition, while the WHO classification for appendiceal cancers is currently based on traditional histopathological criteria, studies have demonstrated that histomorphology does not correlate with survival or treatment response in AC. Due to their rarity, appendiceal cancers have not been studied as extensively as other gastrointestinal cancers. However, their incidence has been increasing steadily over the past decade, making it crucial to identify new and more effective strategies for detection and treatment. Recent efforts to map and understand the molecular landscape of appendiceal cancers have unearthed a wealth of information that has made it evident that appendiceal cancers possess a unique molecular profile, distinct from other gastrointestinal cancers. This review focuses on the epigenetic landscape of epithelial appendiceal cancers and aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of knowledge of epigenetic changes across different appendiceal cancer subtypes, highlighting the challenges as well as the promise of employing epigenetics in the quest for the detection of biomarkers, therapeutic targets, surveillance markers, and predictors of treatment response and survival in epithelial appendiceal neoplasms.

Goblet cell adenocarcinoma: a case report and update regarding investigation and management

This article describes the case of a patient who presented with an acute abdomen. Histopathology of the ruptured appendix identified Goblet Cell Adenocarcinoma. The biology of this rare tumour is now better understood, leading to updated best practise regarding investigation, staging and management.

Goblet cell adenocarcinoma of the ascending colon: An underrecognized diagnostic pitfall

Goblet cell adenocarcinomas (GCA) are infrequent neoplasms of the digestive system that exhibit both mucinous and neuroendocrine differentiation. They predominate in the appendix and rarely involve the colon. Herein, the authors report a case of GCA involving the ascending colon in a 60-year-old woman who presented with severe anemia.

Assessment of Treatment Response after Pressurized Intra-Peritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) for Appendiceal Peritoneal Metastases

Background The aim of this study was to analyse survival and surrogates for oncological response after PIPAC for appendiceal tumours. Methods This retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients with appendiceal peritoneal metastases (PM) treated in experienced PIPAC centers. Primary outcome measure was overall survival (OS) from the date of diagnosis of PM and from the start of PIPAC. Predefined secondary outcome included radiological response (RECIST criteria), repeat laparoscopy and peritoneal cancer index (PCI), histological response assessed by the Peritoneal regression grading system (PRGS) and clinical response. Results Final analysis included 77 consecutive patients (208 PIPAC procedures) from 15 centres. Median OS was 30 months (23.00-46.00) from time of diagnosis and 19 months (13.00-28.00) from start of PIPAC. 35/77 patients (45%) had ≥3 procedures (pp: per protocol). Objective response at PIPAC3 was as follows: RECIST: complete response 4 (11.4%), 11 (31.4%) partial/stable; mean PRGS at PIPAC3: 1.8 ± 0.9. Median PCI: 21 (IQR 18-27) vs. 22 (IQR 17-28) at baseline (p = 0.59); 21 (60%) and 18 (51%) patients were symptomatic at baseline and PIPAC3, respectively (p = 0.873). Median OS in the pp cohort was 22.00 months (19.00-NA) from 1st PIPAC. Conclusion Patients with PM of appendiceal origin had objective treatment response after PIPAC and encouraging survival curves call for further prospective evaluation.