Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors-combined antiangiogenic drugs in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta analysis

New advances in the study of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors-induced liver injury

The application of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has made extraordinary achievements in tumor treatment. Among them, programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors can improve the prognosis of advanced tumors, and have been widely used in clinical practice to treat many types of cancers. However, excessive immune response can also induce immune-related adverse events (irAEs) involving many organs. Of these, immune-related liver injury is the relatively common and carries the highest morbidity, which has attracted the attention of hepatologists all over the world. The incidence of this type of liver injury depends specifically on factors such as the type of drug being combined, viral infection, type of cancer and liver transplantation. Although there is no unanimity on the mechanism of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-induced liver injury, in this review, we also summarize the current evidence that provides insights into the pathogenesis of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-induced liver injury, including the fact that PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors cause reactivation of CTLs, aberrant presentation of autoantigens, hepatic immune tolerance environment is disrupted, and cytokine secretion, among other effects. Patients usually develop liver injury after the use of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, and clinical symptoms mainly include weakness, muscle pain, nausea and vomiting, and jaundice. Histologically, the main manifestation is lobular hepatitis with lobular inflammatory infiltration. Since the specific biomarkers for PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-associated liver injury have not been identified yet, alpha-fetoprotein, IL-6, and IL-33 have the potential to be biomarkers for predicting this type of liver injury in the future, but this requires further research. We also describe the examination and treatment of this type of liver injury, which usually includes eliminating related influencing factors, regularly monitoring liver function, temporarily retaining or permanently stopping ICIs treatment according to the severity of toxicity, and using corticosteroids. This review may provide useful information for the future clinical practice of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors.

Changing landscape of anti-angiogenic therapy: Novel approaches and clinical perspectives

Targeting angiogenesis has remained one of the important aspects in disease biology in general and cancer in particular. Currently (June 2023), over 593 clinical trials have been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov having inference of term 'angiogenesis'. A panel of 14 anti-angiogenic drugs have been approved by FDA for the treatment of variety of cancers and other human ailments. Although the anti-angiogenic therapy (AAT) has gained significant clinical attention as a promising approach in the treatment of various diseases, particularly cancer, however, sizable literature has accumulated in the recent past describing the aggressive nature of tumours after the drug holidays, evolving drug resistance and off-target toxicities. Nevertheless, the emergence of inscrutable compensatory or alternative angiogenic mechanisms is limiting the efficacy of anti-angiogenic drugs and focussing the therapeutic regime as a puzzle of 'Lernaean hydra'. This review offers an overview of recent updates on the efficacy of antiangiogenic therapy and the current clinical performance of aaRTK inhibitors. Additionally, it also explores the changing application landscape of AAT, focusing on its role in diabetic nephropathy, age-related macular degeneration and other neovascular ocular disorders. Combination therapy with antiangiogenic drugs and immune check point inhibitors (ICIs) has emerged as a potential strategy to enhance the therapeutic index of cancer immunotherapy. While clinical studies have demonstrated the clinical efficacy of this approach, they also highlight the complex and sometimes unpredictable adverse events associated with it. Normalizing tumour vasculature has been identified as a key factor in unlocking the full potential of ICIs, thereby providing hope for improved treatment outcomes. The future prospects and challenges of AAT have been described with special reference to integration of technological advances for enhancing its efficacy and applications beyond its discovery.

Efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with anti-angiogenic therapy for the unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma and the benefit for hepatitis B virus etiology subgroup: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related death, worldwide. The predominant causative factor for HCC is hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. We conducted a meta-analysis to estimate the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with anti-angiogenic therapy for the first-line treatment of the unresectable HCC and to evaluate the benefits of different geographic regions and etiology stratifications.

METHODS

Randomized clinical trials published up to 12th November 2022 were searched by online databases. Moreover, effects of hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were extracted from included studies. Pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI for objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 3057 patients from five phase III randomized clinical trials were collected and reviewed for this meta-analysis. The pooled HR of OS (HR = 0.71; 95% CI: 0.60-0.85) and PFS (HR = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.53-0.77) demonstrated significantly better benefit in PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combination group than targeted monotherapy to treat unresectable HCC. In addition, combination therapy showed better ORR and DCR, with ORs of 3.29 (95% CI: 1.92-5.62) and 1.88 (95% CI: 1.35-2.61), respectively. The subgroup analysis indicated that PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combination therapy was significantly superior to anti-angiogenic monotherapy for HBV-related HCC in terms of OS (HR = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.55-0.74) and PFS (HR = 0.53; 95% CI:0.47-0.59), while there was no significant difference in patients with HCV (OS, HR = 0.81, p = 0.1) or non-viral (OS, HR = 0.91, p = 0.37; PFS, HR = 0.77, p = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Meta-analysis revealed for the first-time that PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combination therapy for unresectable HCC was associated with better clinical outcomes than anti-angiogenic monotherapy, especially for HBV infection and Asian population.

Inflammatory bowel disease increases the risk of hepatobiliary pancreatic cancer: A two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis of European and East Asian populations

BACKGROUND

Both inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and hepato-pancreato-biliary cancers (HPBC) have been established to cause a huge socioeconomic burden. Epidemiological studies have revealed a close association between IBD and HPBC.

METHODS

Herein, we utilized inverse-variance weighting to conduct a two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis. We sought to investigate the link between various subtypes of IBD and HPBC. To ensure the accuracy and consistency of our findings, we conducted heterogeneity tests, gene pleiotropy tests, and sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

Compared to the general population, IBD patients in Europe exhibited a 1.22-fold increased incidence of pancreatic cancer (PC) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1.0022-1.4888 (p = 0.0475). We also found a 1.14-fold increased incidence of PC in Crohn's disease (CD) patients with (95% CI: 1.0017-1.3073, p = 0.0472). In the East Asian population, the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was 1.28-fold higher (95% CI = 1.0709-1.5244, p = 0.0065) in IBD patients than in the general population. Additionally, ulcerative colitis (UC) patients displayed 1.12-fold (95% CI: 1.1466-1.3334, p < 0.0001) and 1.31-fold (95% CI: 1.0983-1.5641, p = 0.0027) increased incidences of HCC and cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), respectively. Finally, the incidence of PC was 1.19-fold higher in CD patients than in the general population (95% CI = 1.0741-1.3132, p = 0.0008).

CONCLUSION

Our study validated that IBD is a risk factor for HPBC. This causal relationship exhibited significant heterogeneity in different European and East Asian populations.

Potential Immunotherapy Targets for Liver-Directed Therapies, and the Current Scope of Immunotherapeutics for Liver-Related Malignancies

Liver cancer, including hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, is increasing in incidence and mortality across the globe. An improved understanding of the complex tumor microenvironment has opened many therapeutic doors and led to the development of novel pharmaceuticals targeting cellular signaling pathways or immune checkpoints. These interventions have significantly improved tumor control rates and patient outcomes, both in clinical trials and in real-world practice. Interventional radiologists play an important role in the multidisciplinary team given their expertise in minimally invasive locoregional therapy, as the bulk of these tumors are usually in the liver. The aim of this review is to highlight the immunological therapeutic targets for primary liver cancers, the available immune-based approaches, and the contributions that interventional radiology can provide in the care of these patients.

Robotic-assisted versus standard laparoscopic radical cystectomy in bladder cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) versus laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) in the treatment of bladder cancer.

Methods

Two researchers independently searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and CBM using the index words to identify the qualified studies which included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized controlled trials (prospective and retrospective studies), and the investigators scanned references of these articles to prevent missing articles. Differences in clinical outcomes between the two procedures were analyzed by calculating odds risk (OR) and mean difference (MD) with an associated 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results

Sixteen comparative studies were included in the meta-analysis with 1467 patients in the RARC group and 897 patients in the LRC group. The results indicated that RARC could significantly decrease blood loss (P = 0.01; MD: -82.56, 95% CI: -145.04 to -20.08), and complications 90 days or more after surgery, regardless of whether patients were Grade ≤ II (P = 0.0008; OR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.48 to 0.82) or Grade ≥ III (P = 0.006; OR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.40 to 0.86), as well as overall complications (P: 0.01; OR = 0.52; 95% CI: 0.32 to 0.85). However, there was no statistical difference between the two groups at total operative time, intraoperative complications, transfusion rate, short-term recovery, hospital stay, complications within 30 days of surgery, and bladder cancer-related mortality.

Conclusions

The meta-analysis demonstrates that RARC is a safe and effective treatment for bladder cancer, like LRC, and patients with RARC benefit from less blood loss and fewer long-term complications related to surgery, and should be considered a viable alternative to LRC. There still need high-quality, larger sample, multi-centric, long-term follow-up RCTs to confirm our conclusion.