Application basis of combining antiangiogenic therapy with radiotherapy and immunotherapy in cancer treatment

Radiation Therapy With Combination Therapy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Antiangiogenic Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

PURPOSE

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with antiangiogenic therapy have limited efficacy in treating advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The synergistic effect of systemic therapy and radiation therapy (RT) might resolve this problem. We aimed to investigate the effect of RT on the treatment outcomes of ICIs and antiangiogenic combination therapy in patients with advanced-stage HCC.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This retrospective observational study analyzed the medical records of 194 patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage C HCC who were admitted to our center from August 2018 to June 2022 and received ICIs combined with antiangiogenic therapy as the first-line treatment. Patients who were administered RT for tumor thrombus or symptomatic metastases within 8 weeks of the commencement of combination therapy were allocated to the RT group, whereas those who did not receive RT were assigned to the non-radiation therapy (NRT) group. Propensity score matching was used to mitigate selection bias. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints included objective response rate, disease control rate (DCR), local PFS, out-of-field PFS, and treatment-related adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 76 patients diagnosed with advanced-stage HCC and treated with ICIs and antiangiogenic therapy were included in the study, with 33 patients in the RT group and 43 patients in the non-RT group. After propensity score matching, 29 matched patient pairs were generated. The median follow-up was 15.5 months, and the RT sites were mainly located on the tumor thrombus (55.2%) and extrahepatic metastatic lesions (48.3%). The median PFS was 8.3 months (95% CI, 5.4-11.3) in the RT group and 4.2 months (95% CI, 3.4-5.0) in the NRT group (P < .001). The median OS was not reached in the RT group and was 9.7 months (95% CI, 4.1-15.3) in the NRT group (P = .002). The objective response rate was 75.9% (95% CI, 56.5-89.7) in the RT group and 24.1% (95% CI, 10.3-43.5) in the NRT group (P < .001). The DCR was 100% in the RT group and 75.9% (95% CI, 56.5-89.7) in the NRT group (P = .005). The median local PFS and out-of-field PFS were 13.2 months (95% CI, 6.3-20.1) and 10.8 months (95% CI, 7.0-14.7), respectively. RT was an independent prognostic factor for PFS (hazard ratio = 0.33; 95% CI, 0.17-0.64; P < .001) and OS (hazard ratio = 0.28; 95% CI, 0.11-0.68; P = .005), respectively. The rates of any grade treatment-related adverse events were similar between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In comparison to the combination of ICIs and antiangiogenic therapy, the inclusion of RT has been observed to improve the DCR and survival outcomes in patients with advanced-stage HCC. The safety profile of this triple therapy was satisfactory.

Overview of tumor immunotherapy based on approved drugs

Tumor immunotherapy has become a new hotspot for cancer treatment. Various immunotherapies, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors, oncolytic viruses (OVs), cytokines, and cancer vaccines, have been used to treat tumors. They operate through different mechanisms, along with certain toxicities and side effects. Understanding the mechanisms by which immunotherapy modulates the immune system is essential for improving the efficacy and managing these adverse effects. This article discusses various currently approved cancer immunotherapy mechanisms and related agents approved by the Food and Drug Administration, the European Medicines Agency, and the Medicines and Medical Devices Agency. We also review the latest progress in immune drugs approved by the National Medical Products Administration, including monoclonal antibodies, cytokines, OVs, and chimeric antigen receptor-T cell therapy, to help understand the clinical application of tumor immunotherapy.

Knowledge mapping of immunotherapy for thyroid cancer from 1980 to 2022: A review

With the gradual development of immunotherapy for thyroid cancer, relevant research has increased. To better understand the current situation, development trend, evolution process, and research hotspots of this field, we conducted this comprehensive bibliometrics visual analysis. We retrieved papers published from 1980 to 2022 from Web of Science Core Collection on January 31, 2023. CiteSpace, Pajek, VOSviewer, R-Bibliometrix, and Scimago Graphics are the tools to perform the analysis. Analysis methods mainly include co-occurrence analysis and cluster analysis. Analysis objects are countries or regions, institutions, authors, journals, and keywords, etc. In terms of publication number, the recent decade has witnessed rapid growth. USA was the most prolific country and has the most influence in the cooperation team. Sweden took the lead in focus on this research field and lasted for 21 years. Garden State Cancer Center was released most papers (28). INSERM played a major role in institutional cooperation. Goldenberg DM published the most papers (48), with H-Index 25 and G-Index 43. Journal of Nuclear Medicine has the greatest papers published (41). The average impactor factor of the top 10 journals is 7.2058. The top keywords with high burst strength are: radioimmunotherapy (14.85), monoclonal antibody (13.78), non hodgkins lymphoma (12.54). The research field of immunotherapy for thyroid cancer will be further developed. This study provides a valuable reference for future research in the field.

Recombinant Endostatin as a Potential Radiosensitizer in the Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most prevalent type of lung cancer, which is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Over the past decades, tumour angiogenesis has been intensely studied in the treatment of NSCLC due to its fundamental role in cancer progression. Several anti-angiogenic drugs, such as recombinant endostatin (RE), have been evaluated in several preclinical and clinical trials, with mixed and often disappointing results. However, there is currently an emerging interest in RE due to its ability to create a vascular normalization window, which could further improve treatment efficacy of the standard NSCLC treatment. This review provides an overview of preclinical and clinical studies that combined RE and radiotherapy for NSCLC treatment. Furthermore, it highlights the ongoing challenges that have to be overcome in order to maximize the benefit; as well as the potential advantage of combinations with particle therapy and immunotherapy, which are rapidly gaining momentum in the treatment landscape of NSCLC. Different angiogenic and immunosuppressive effects are observed between particle therapy and conventional X-ray radiotherapy. The combination of RE, particle therapy and immunotherapy presents a promising future therapeutic triad for NSCLC.