Organ-Specific Immune-Related Adverse Events Associated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Monotherapy Versus Combination Therapy in Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

A watch-and-wait approach for metachronous multiple colon cancer following neoadjuvant immunotherapy: a case report

The application of immunotherapy for treating colorectal cancer (CRC) is currently a research hotspot, and neoadjuvant immunotherapy has shown initial success in treating CRC. The watch-and-wait (W&W) approach is often used after achieving a clinical complete response (cCR) following preoperative treatment of low rectal cancer. However, thus far, the W&W approach has not been reported for patients with colon cancer. Here, we report the case of a 64-year-old patient with heterogeneous multigenic CRC who achieved cCR after five sessions of neoadjuvant immunotherapy before surgery. A W&W approach was used to spare the patient from surgery. A 64-year-old male presented with intermittent abdominal pain. A colonoscopy examination detected an irregular cauliflower-like mass near the hepatic flexure of the ascending colon. The biopsy results indicated adenocarcinoma of the ascending colon. The patient was administered pembrolizumab (200 mg, ivgtt, q3w). After one cycle of treatment, the intestinal obstruction symptoms disappeared, and the treatment was continued for additional three sessions. After complete clinical remission of the tumor was confirmed, the W&W approach was adopted. Follow-up CT scans and colonoscopy examinations confirmed no local tumor regeneration or metastasis. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy is effective for patients with DNA mismatch repair gene deficiency and/or microsatellite instability high with a high rate of cCR or pathologic complete response. The W&W approach may also be suitable for patients with colon cancer. The safety and feasibility of watch and wait in patients with colon cancer need to be verified by more clinical data.

Development and Validation of a Prediction Model for Thyroid Dysfunction in Patients During Immunotherapy

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to develop and validate a predictive model for assessing the risk of thyroid toxicity following treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on a cohort of 586 patients diagnosed with malignant tumors who received programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors. The patients were randomly divided into training and validation cohorts in a 7:3 ratio. Logistic regression analyses were performed on the training set to identify risk factors of thyroid dysfunction, and a nomogram was developed based on these findings. Internal validation was performed using K-fold cross-validation on the validation set. The performance of the nomogram was assessed in terms of discrimination and calibration. Additionally, decision curve analysis was utilized to demonstrate the decision efficiency of the model.

RESULTS

Our clinical prediction model consisted of 4 independent predictors of thyroid immune-related adverse events, namely baseline thyrotropin (TSH, OR = 1.427, 95%CI:1.163-1.876), baseline thyroglobulin antibody (TgAb, OR = 1.105, 95%CI:1.035-1.180), baseline thyroid peroxidase antibody (TPOAb, OR = 1.172, 95%CI:1.110-1.237), and baseline platelet count (platelet, OR = 1.004, 95%CI:1.000-1.007). The developed nomogram achieved excellent discrimination with an area under the curve of 0.863 (95%CI: 0.817-0.909) and 0.885 (95%CI: 0.827-0.944) in the training and internal validation cohorts respectively. Calibration curves exhibited a good fit, and the decision curve indicated favorable clinical benefits.

CONCLUSION

The proposed nomogram serves as an effective and intuitive tool for predicting the risk of thyroid immune-related adverse events, facilitating clinicians making individualized decisions based on patient-specific information.

Enhanced Intratumoral Delivery of Immunomodulator Monophosphoryl Lipid A through Hyperbranched Polyglycerol-Coated Biodegradable Nanoparticles

Immunomodulatory agents have significant potential to enhance cancer treatment but have demonstrated limited efficacy beyond the preclinical setting owing to poor pharmacokinetics and toxicity associated with systemic administration. Conversely, when locally delivered, immunomodulatory agents require repeated administration to optimize immune stimulation. To overcome these challenges, we encapsulated the toll-like receptor 4 agonist monophosphoryl lipid A (MPLA) within hyperbranched polyglycerol-coated biodegradable nanoparticles (NPs) engineered for gradual drug release from the NP core, resulting in a more persistent stimulation of antitumor immune responses while minimizing systemic side effects. In a model of malignant melanoma, we demonstrate that hyperbranched polyglycerol-NP encapsulation significantly improves the antitumor efficacy of MPLA by enhancing its ability to remodel the tumor microenvironment. Relative to free MPLA, hyperbranched polyglycerol-coated NP-encapsulated MPLA significantly increased the NK cell- and cytotoxic T-cell-mediated antitumor immune response and tuned the tumor-draining lymph nodes toward a T helper 1 response. Furthermore, when combined with local delivery of a chemotherapeutic agent, hyperbranched polyglycerol-NP-MPLA induces the conversion of an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment to immunogenic tumor microenvironment and significantly improves survival.

Hepatobiliary complications of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have dramatically changed the landscape of cancer therapy. Over the last decade, both their primary focus in trials and clinical application have exponentially risen, with repeated demonstrations of their efficacy in improving survival in various cancer types. The adverse effects of these drugs on various organ systems were recognised in early phase studies. Given their relatively new emergence on the market, there has been increasing interest into short- and long-term effects and management of ICIs in real-world settings. ICI-related hepatobiliary toxicities are often challenging to diagnose and difficult to distinguish from other causes of deranged liver biochemical tests. The aim of this review is to provide an up-to-date and detailed exploration of the hepatobiliary complications of ICIs, including pathogenesis and approaches to diagnosis and management.

Multiple immune-related adverse events secondary to checkpoint inhibitor therapy in patients with advanced cancer: association with treatment effectiveness

Introduction

Checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) are widely used in cancer treatment with a potential of causing immune-related adverse events (IRAEs). Several studies have reported a positive correlation between development of IRAEs and improved survival outcome. However, few studies have focused on the potential role of multiple IRAEs on treatment effectiveness. This study aimed at investigating the association between multiple IRAEs and treatment effectiveness in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in advanced cancer patients.

Methods

We performed a retrospective cohort study at three Swedish centers. All patients (n=600) treated with PD-L1 or PD-1 inhibitor, in monotherapy or in combination for advanced cancer between January 2017 and December 2021 were included. Multiple IRAEs were defined as IRAEs involving more than one organ system either simultaneously or sequentially. Time-depending Cox-regression model to mitigate the risk for immortal time bias (ITB) was applied.

Results

The major tumor types were non-small cell lung cancer (205 patients; 34.2%) and malignant melanoma (196 patients; 32.7%). Of all patients,32.8% developed single IRAE and 16.2% multiple IRAEs. Patients with multiple IRAEs showed significantly improved PFS (Hazard Ratio, HR=0.78 95% Confidence Interval, CI: 0.57-0.98) and OS (HR=0.65 95% CI: 0.44-0.95) compared to patients with single IRAE or no IRAE (HR=0.46 95% CI:0.34-0.62 for PFS vs HR=0.41 95% CI: 0.28-0.60 for OS).

Conclusion

In conclusion, our data supports a stronger association between development of multiple as opposed to single IRAEs and clinical effectiveness in advanced cancer patients treated with CPIs.

Hepatitis-related adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients: an observational, retrospective, pharmacovigilance study using the FAERS database

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), including anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1 and anti-CTLA-4 antibodies, have become a standard treatment for multiple cancer types. However, ICIs can induce immune-related adverse events, with hepatitis-related adverse events (HRAEs) being of particular concern. Our objective is to identify and characterize HRAEs that exhibit a significant association with ICIs using real-world data. Methods: In this observational and retrospective pharmacovigilance study, we extracted real-world adverse events reports from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database spanning from the first quarter of 2004 to the first quarter of 2023. We conducted both Frequentist and Bayesian methodologies in the framework of disproportionality analysis, which included the reporting odds ratios (ROR) and information components (IC) to explore the intricate relationship between ICIs and HRAEs. Results: Through disproportionality analysis, we identified three categories of HRAEs as being significantly related with ICIs, including autoimmune hepatitis (634 cases, ROR 19.34 [95% CI 17.80-21.02]; IC025 2.43), immune-mediated hepatitis (546 cases, ROR 217.24 [189.95-248.45]; IC025 4.75), and hepatitis fulminant (80 cases, ROR 4.56 [3.65-5.70]; IC025 0.49). The median age of patients who report ICI-related HRAEs was 63 years (interquartile range [IQR] 53.8-72), with a fatal outcome observed in 24.9% (313/1,260) of these reports. Cases pertaining to skin cancer, lung cancer, and kidney cancer constituted the majority of these occurrences. Patients treated with anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 antibodies exhibited a higher frequency of immune-mediated hepatitis in comparison to those undergoing anti-CTLA-4 monotherapy, with a ROR of 3.59 (95% CI 1.78-6.18). Moreover, the dual ICI therapy demonstrated higher reporting rates of ICI-related HRAEs compared to ICI monotherapy. Conclusion: Our findings confirm that ICI treatment carries a significant risk of severe HRAEs, in particular autoimmune hepatitis, immune-mediated hepatitis, and hepatitis fulminant. Healthcare providers should exercise heightened vigilance regarding these risks when managing patients receiving ICIs.

Efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1/PD-L1-based dual immunotherapies versus PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor alone in patients with advanced solid tumor: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Numerous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have investigated PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-based combination therapies. The debate surrounding the potential additive clinical benefits of combination of two immune-oncology (IO) therapies for cancer patients persists.

METHODS

Both published and grey sources of randomized clinical trials that compared anti-PD-1/PD-L1-based immunotherapy combinations with monotherapy in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors were encompassed. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS) and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs).

RESULTS

Our analysis encompassed 31 studies comprising 10,341 patients, which covered 12 distinct immune-oncology combination regimens. Across all patients, the immunotherapy combinations exhibited the capability to enhance the ORR (OR = 1.23 [95% CI 1.13-1.34]) and extend PFS (HR = 0.91 [95% CI 0.87-0.95]). However, the observed enhancement in OS (HR = 0.96 [95% CI 0.91-1.01]) was of no significance. Greater benefits in terms of PFS (HR = 0.82 [95% CI 0.72 to 0.93]) and OS (HR = 0.85 [95% CI 0.73 to 0.99]) may be particularly pronounced in cases where PD-L1 expression is negative. Notably, despite a heightened risk of any-grade TRAEs (OR = 1.72 [95% CI 1.40-2.11]) and grade greater than or equal to 3 TRAEs (OR = 2.01 [95% CI 1.67-2.43]), toxicity was generally manageable.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that incorporating an additional immunotherapy agent with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors can elevate the response rate and reduce the risk of disease progression, all while maintaining manageable toxicity. However, there remains a challenge in translating these primary clinical benefits into extended overall survival.

Incidence of thyroid dysfunction caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has been associated with many adverse reactions. Thyroid dysfunction, the most common adverse reaction of the endocrine system, has also attracted significant attention. This study aimed to analyse the effect of ICIs combined with chemotherapy on thyroid function in patients with TNBC.

METHODS

As of November 4, 2023, we searched the PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases for clinical trials of ICIs combined with chemotherapy for the treatment of TNBC. The incidence of hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism was calculated using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

In the final analysis, 3,226 patients from 19 studies were included. The total incidence of all-grade hypothyroidism induced by the combination of ICIs and chemotherapy in treating TNBC (12% (95% confidence intervals(CI): 0.10-0.15)) was higher than that of hyperthyroidism (5% (95% CI: 0.04-0.06)). Pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy caused the highest incidence of all grades of hypothyroidism for 13% (95% CI: 0.05-0.06). Durvalumab combined with chemotherapy caused the highest incidence of all grades of hyperthyroidism, at 7% (95% CI: 0.03-0.11). ICIs combined with chemotherapy caused a higher incidence of all grades of hypothyroidism in advanced TNBC (15% (95% CI: 0.13-0.17)) than in early stage TNBC (10% (95% CI: 0.07-0.13)).

CONCLUSION

In TNBC, the incidence of hypothyroidism caused by the combination of ICIs and chemotherapy was significantly higher than that caused by hyperthyroidism. Pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy resulted in the highest incidence of hypothyroidism. The incidence of hypothyroidism in patients with advanced TNBC was significantly higher than that in patients with early stage TNBC. In addition, ICIs combined with chemotherapy resulted in 16 out of 3,226 patients experiencing grade ≥ 3 thyroid dysfunction. Although the incidence of severe thyroid dysfunction is low, it requires attention.

PROSPERO

CRD42023477933.

Advancements in the research of immune checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Esophageal cancer (EC) has a high mortality rate and poor prognosis. Most patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage or with distant metastasis, making surgery impossible. Traditional curative radiotherapy and chemotherapy have limited efficacy. In recent years, with the development of clinical trials, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown promising results in treating advanced and metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients. ICIs have gradually become a primary therapeutic approach for EC. This review summarizes and provides an overview of the current research status and progress of ICIs in the treatment of advanced ESCC patients.

Management of liver and gastrointestinal toxicity induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors: Position statement of the AEEH-AEG-SEPD-SEOM-GETECCU

The development of the immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is one of the most remarkable achievements in cancer therapy in recent years. However, their exponential use has led to an increase in immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Gastrointestinal and liver events encompass hepatitis, colitis and upper digestive tract symptoms accounting for the most common irAEs, with incidence rates varying from 2% to 40%, the latter in patients undergoing combined ICIs therapy. Based on the current scientific evidence derived from both randomized clinical trials and real-world studies, this statement document provides recommendations on the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of the gastrointestinal and hepatic ICI-induced adverse events.

Polygenic risk score for ulcerative colitis predicts immune checkpoint inhibitor-mediated colitis

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-mediated colitis (IMC) is a common adverse event of treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). We hypothesize that genetic susceptibility to Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) predisposes to IMC. In this study, we first develop a polygenic risk scores for CD (PRSCD) and UC (PRSUC) in cancer-free individuals and then test these PRSs on IMC in a cohort of 1316 patients with ICI-treated non-small cell lung cancer and perform a replication in 873 ICI-treated pan-cancer patients. In a meta-analysis, the PRSUC predicts all-grade IMC (ORmeta=1.35 per standard deviation [SD], 95% CI = 1.12-1.64, P = 2×10-03) and severe IMC (ORmeta=1.49 per SD, 95% CI = 1.18-1.88, P = 9×10-04). PRSCD is not associated with IMC. Furthermore, PRSUC predicts severe IMC among patients treated with combination ICIs (ORmeta=2.20 per SD, 95% CI = 1.07-4.53, P = 0.03). Overall, PRSUC can identify patients receiving ICI at risk of developing IMC and may be useful to monitor patients and improve patient outcomes.

Management of liver and gastrointestinal toxicity induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors: Position statement of the AEEH-AEG-SEPD-SEOM-GETECCU

The development of the immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is one of the most remarkable achievements in cancer therapy in recent years. However, their exponential use has led to an increase in immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Gastrointestinal and liver events encompass hepatitis, colitis and upper digestive tract symptoms accounting for the most common irAEs, with incidence rates varying from 2 % to 40 %, the latter in patients undergoing combined ICIs therapy. Based on the current scientific evidence derived from both randomized clinical trials and real-world studies, this statement document provides recommendations on the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of the gastrointestinal and hepatic ICI-induced adverse events.

Adverse events of immune checkpoint therapy alone versus when combined with vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors: a pooled meta-analysis of 1735 patients

Background

Combining immune checkpoint therapy (ICT) and vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors (VEGFi) may result in increased treatment-related and immune-related adverse events (TRAEs and irAEs) compared to ICT alone. This metanalysis was conducted to identify prospective phase II or III clinical studies that evaluated the toxicity profile of ICT + VEGFi compared to ICT alone.

Methods

A systematic search was performed across all cancer types and major databases until August 10, 2022, and screening was done by two independent investigators. Inclusion criteria included phase 2 or 3 studies with at least one arm of patients treated with combination therapy and one arm treated with monotherapy. Adverse event data were pooled using a restricted maximum likelihood fixed effects model, and heterogeneity using Cochran's Q (chi-square) test.

Results

7 out of 9366 studies met the inclusion criteria, and 808 and 927 patients were treated with ICT monotherapy and a combination of ICT with VEGFi, respectively. Only one study reported irAEs, so the analysis was restricted to TRAEs. The total number of TRAEs was significantly higher in the ICT + VEGFi group (RR:1.49; 95% CI 1.37 -1.62; p=1.5×10-21), and more frequent treatment withdrawals were attributed to TRAEs (RR:3.10; 95% CI 1.12-8.59; p=0.029). The highest TRAE effect size increases noted for rash (RR 6.50; 95% CI 3.76 - 11.25; p=2.1×10-11), hypertension (RR:6.07; 95% CI 3.69-10.00; p=1.3×10-12), hypothyroidism (RR:5.02; 95% CI 3.08 - 8.19; p=8.9×10-11), and diarrhea (RR:4.94; 95% CI 3.21-7.62; p=3.8×10-13). Other significantly more frequent TRAEs included nausea, anemia, anorexia, and proteinuria.

Conclusion

Combination therapy with ICT and VEGFi carries a higher risk of certain TRAEs, such as rash, hypertension, hypothyroidism, diarrhea, nausea, anorexia, and proteinuria, compared to ICT monotherapy. More granular details on the cause of AEs, particularly irAEs, should be provided in future trials of such regimens.

Fulminant ACTH decrease following diabetic ketoacidosis induced by immune checkpoint inhibitor combination therapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab: A case report

RATIONALE

The increasing use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for treating malignant tumors result in the concomitant rise of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). This case report may provide useful insight to understanding the etiology of ICI-induced hypophysitis, a severe irAE leading to potentially fatal secondary adrenal insufficiency.

PATIENT CONCERNS

An 81-year-old Japanese man was hospitalized for diabetic ketoacidosis following 4 courses of ICI combination therapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab for metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

DIAGNOSIS

Insulin secretion was depleted, leading to diagnosis of fulminant type 1 diabetes. Adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and cortisol levels were very high (60.8 pmol/L and 1575 nmol/L, respectively) upon admission. ACTH and cortisol returned to normal ranges on the 2nd day. On the 8th day, an ACTH loading test showed intact cortisol response (peak value 519 nmol/L). However, on the 14th day, there was a sharp decrease in ACTH and cortisol levels (10.5 pmol/L and 47 nmol/L, respectively) accompanied by fatigue and a drop in blood pressure to 97/63 mm Hg. As secondary adrenal insufficiency was suspected, hydrocortisone replacement was initiated. An ACTH loading test on the 17th day revealed low cortisol peak (peak value 232 nmol/L), indicating sudden disruption of adrenal function. Magnetic resonance imaging showed no abnormal findings and there was no other pituitary hormone deficiency. These findings, along with the patient clinical course, suggest that secondary adrenal insufficiency was caused by acute ACTH producing cell destruction as an irAE associated with ICI therapy.

INTERVENTIONS

The patient hyperglycemia and ketoacidosis were treated using extracellular fluid and insulin therapy. After development of adrenal insufficiency, hydrocortisone 20 mg was started, and the patient symptoms improved.

OUTCOMES

He was continued on insulin therapy, hydrocortisone, and reinitiated nivolumab.

LESSONS

This case provides a detailed course of the fulminant onset of ACTH deficiency during ICI administration, emphasizing the importance of close monitoring.

Thyroid Storm and Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Induced by Combined Ipilimumab and Nivolumab Immunotherapy: A Case Report

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionised the management of cancer, and they are being used in combination to improve survival outcomes. Combination therapy is, however, associated with an increase in the frequency and severity of immune-related adverse events such as endocrine disorders. We report a case of simultaneous onset thyroid storm and type 1 diabetes mellitus induced by ipilimumab and nivolumab therapy in a patient with advanced melanoma. This case report suggests that combination immunotherapy can trigger a robust immune reaction leading to the development of multiple life-threatening endocrinopathies, including rapid onset destructive thyroiditis and insulitis. Prompt identification and management are essential to prevent morbidity and mortality.

Polygenic risk score for ulcerative colitis predicts immune checkpoint inhibitor-mediated colitis

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a remarkable advancement in cancer therapeutics; however, a substantial proportion of patients develop severe immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Understanding and predicting irAEs is a key to advancing precision immuno-oncology. Immune checkpoint inhibitor-mediated colitis (IMC) is a significant complication from ICI and can have life-threatening consequences. Based on clinical presentation, IMC mimics inflammatory bowel disease, however the link is poorly understood. We hypothesized that genetic susceptibility to Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) may predispose to IMC. We developed and validated polygenic risk scores for CD (PRSCD) and UC (PRSUC) in cancer-free individuals and assessed the role of each of these PRSs on IMC in a cohort of 1,316 patients with non-small cell lung cancer who received ICIs. Prevalence of all-grade IMC in our cohort was 4% (55 cases), and for severe IMC, 2.5% (32 cases). The PRSUC predicted the development of all-grade IMC (HR=1.34 per standard deviation [SD], 95% CI=1.02-1.76, P=0.04) and severe IMC (HR=1.62 per SD, 95% CI=1.12-2.35, P=0.01). PRSCD was not associated with IMC or severe IMC. The association between PRSUC and IMC (all-grade and severe) was consistent in an independent pan-cancer cohort of patients treated with ICIs. Furthermore, PRSUC predicted severe IMC among patients treated with combination ICIs (OR = 2.20 per SD, 95% CI = 1.07-4.53, P=0.03). This is the first study to demonstrate the potential clinical utility of a PRS for ulcerative colitis in identifying patients receiving ICI at high risk of developing IMC, where risk reduction and close monitoring strategies could help improve overall patient outcomes.

Selected cutaneous adverse events in patients treated with ICI monotherapy and combination therapy: a retrospective pharmacovigilance study and meta-analysis

Introduction: Cutaneous adverse events are commonly reported immune-related adverse events (irAEs), some of which are serious or even life-threatening, and it is essential to study these specific cutaneous AEs to understand their characteristics and risk. Methods: We performed a meta-analysis of published clinical trials for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to evaluate the incidence of cutaneous adverse events, using data from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases. Results: A total of 232 trials with 45,472 patients were involved. Results showed that anti-PD-1 and targeted therapy combinations were associated with higher risk for most of the selected cutaneous adverse events. In addition, a retrospective pharmacovigilance study was conducted using the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Events System database. Reporting odds ratio (ROR) and Bayesian information components (IC) were used to perform the disproportionality analysis. Cases were extracted from January 2011 to September 2020. We identified 381 (20.24%) maculopapular rash, 213 (11.32%) vitiligo, 215 (11.42%) Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), and 165 (8.77%) toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) cases. For vitiligo, anti-PD-1/L1 combined with anti-CTLA-4 therapy showed the strongest signal (ROR: 55.89; 95% CI: 42.34-73.78; IC₀₂₅: 4.73). Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) was reported with the most significant association with combined anti-PD-1/L1 and VEGF (R)-TKIs (ROR: 18.67; 95% CI: 14.77-23.60; IC₀₂₅: 3.67). For SJS/TEN, antiPD-1 inhibitors showed the strongest signal (ROR: 3.07; 95% CI: 2.68-3.52; IC₀₂₅: 1.39). The median onset time of vitiligo and SJS/TEN was 83 and 24 days, respectively. Conclusion: Overall, in selected cutaneous AEs, each of them showed specific characteristics. It is necessary to realize their differences and take appropriate interventions in patients with different regimens.

Progress and Challenges of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Hypophysitis

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a new type of antitumor drug which can achieve antitumor goals by blocking the binding of immune checkpoints to their ligands, thereby enhancing the activity of T cells. Meanwhile, ICIs block the binding of immune checkpoints to their ligands, disrupting the immune tolerance of T cells to self-antigens, which may lead to a series of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced hypophysitis (IH) is a relatively rare irAE. Due to the lack of specificity in clinical manifestations, it is difficult to accurately diagnose IH in a timely manner in clinical practice. However, the risk of adverse events, especially IH, for patients receiving ICIs has not been adequately investigated. Missed or delayed diagnosis may lead to poor prognosis or even adverse clinical outcomes. In this article, we summarize the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, diagnosis and treatment of IH.

Cutaneous adverse events in lung cancer patients on the therapy based on PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors: A prospective observational cohort study

AIM

This is a prospective study of cutaneous adverse events (CAEs) in lung cancer patients treated by programmed cell death-1(PD-1) inhibitors and programmed cell death-ligand 1(PD-L1) inhibitors-based single or combination therapy.

PATIENTS & METHODS

It were included that lung cancer patients who developed CAEs from January 2019 to July 2021 after applying PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in our institution.

RESULTS

A total of 107 patients with 112 CAEs were enrolled, of which 71 patients received PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy, 31 patients received PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic/targeted therapy, and 5 patients received PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors monotherapy. The median time to CAEs onset was 8.7w (0.3w-70.7w) for PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy, 10.1w (0.4w-103.0w) for PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic/targeted therapy, and 13.6w (0.7w-50.6w) for PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors monotherapy. The most common CAEs were reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation (RCCEP) (30.8%, 33/107), followed by eczematous (21.5%, 23/107) and pruritus only (15.9%, 17/107). 7 patients (6.5%, 7/107) had grade 3-4 CAE.

CONCLUSION

Most CAEs are mild to moderate and easily controlled. Early diagnosis and intervention for CAEs are important.

Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals distinct T cell populations in immune-related adverse events of checkpoint inhibitors

PD-1 is an inhibitory receptor in T cells, and antibodies that block its interaction with ligands augment anti-tumor immune responses. The clinical potential of these agents is limited by the fact that half of all patients develop immune-related adverse events (irAEs). To generate insights into the cellular changes that occur during anti-PD-1 treatment, we performed single-cell RNA sequencing of circulating T cells collected from patients with cancer. Using the K-nearest-neighbor-based network graph-drawing layout, we show the involvement of distinctive genes and subpopulations of T cells. We identify that at baseline, patients with arthritis have fewer CD8 TCM cells, patients with pneumonitis have more CD4 TH2 cells, and patients with thyroiditis have more CD4 TH17 cells when compared with patients who do not develop irAEs. These data support the hypothesis that different populations of T cells are associated with different irAEs and that characterization of these cells' pre-treatment has the potential to serve as a toxicity-specific predictive biomarker.

The Current status of steroid-refractory immune-checkpoint-inhibitor-related hepatotoxicity

ICI-related hepatotoxicity (IRH) is becoming more and more common as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have begun to be increasingly approved and used in combination with other anti-tumor drugs worldwide. Steroids are the first choice for the treatment of IRH, but the subsequent optimal treatment algorithm remains unclear if the disease progresses to steroid-refractory IRH. Therefore, in this paper we reviewed all the pertinent literature on steroid-refractory IRH to the greatest extent possible in an attempt to provide information on which to base an update of the treatment algorithm for steroid-refractory IRH.

Dual immune checkpoint inhibitors or combined with anti-VEGF agents in advanced, unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy did not show superiority of survival over standard therapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. The combination immunotherapy including dual immune checkpoint inhibitors or combined with anti-VEGF agents have become a trend, but not fully evaluated. This study aimed to evaluate and compare distinct combination immunotherapy on efficacy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane databases were systematically searched from inception to January 31, 2022. The primary endpoints were overall objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), six-month progression-free survival rate (PFSR6m) and one-year overall survival rate (OSR1y).

RESULTS

11 studies with 16 independent cohorts and 3342 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with first-line sorafenib, combination immunotherapy resulted in a significant improvement in ORR (RR, 2.74; 95%CI, 1.55-4.85; p = 0.0006), PFS (HR, 0.57; 95%CI, 0.49-0.65; p<0.0001) and OS (HR, 0.65; 95%CI, 0.52-0.82; p = 0.0002). Based on RECIST 1.1, the pooled ORR, PFSR6m and OSR1y for combination immunotherapy were 24.6% (95%CI: 20.3%-29.6%), 42.0% (95%CI: 34.2%-50.3%) and 61.8% (95%CI: 57.7%-65.7%), respectively. In distinct combination regimens, PD-1/L1 inhibitors plus anti-VEGF agents showed a significant superiority of clinical benefit than PD-1/L1 inhibitors plus CTLA-4 inhibitors (ORR: 25.2% vs 23.4%, p = 0.033; PFSR6m: 47.4% vs 23.2%, p<0.001; OSR1y: 65.1% vs 55.0%, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study was the first meta-analysis to demonstrate the better survival benefit and tolerable toxicity of combination immunotherapy than standard therapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Compared with PD-1/L1 inhibitors plus CTLA-4 inhibitors, the regimens of PD-1/L1 inhibitors plus anti-VEGF agents may be associated with a significantly better clinical benefit. The difference in long-term survival and response population between two distinct combination regimens required further exploration.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy in Oncology: Current Uses and Future Directions: JACC: CardioOncology State-of-the-Art Review

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a major class of immuno-oncology therapeutics that have significantly improved the prognosis of various cancers, both in (neo)adjuvant and metastatic settings. Unlike other conventional therapies, ICIs elicit antitumor effects by enhancing host immune systems to eliminate cancer cells. There are 3 approved ICI classes by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration: inhibitors targeting cytotoxic T lymphocyte associated antigen 4, programmed death 1/programmed death-ligand 1, and lymphocyte-activation gene 3, with many more in development. ICIs are commonly associated with distinct toxicities, known as immune-related adverse events, which can arise during treatment or less frequently be of late onset, usually relating to excessive activation of the immune system. Acute cardiovascular immune-related adverse events such as myocarditis are rare; however, data suggesting chronic cardiovascular sequelae are emerging. This review presents the current landscape of ICIs in oncology, with a focus on important aspects relevant to cardiology.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in esophageal cancer: Clinical development and perspectives

Esophageal cancer is the sixth most common cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. The standard treatment for unresectable esophageal cancer is systemic chemotherapy. However, the survival benefit is limited, with a median overall survival of less than 10 months. The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), including programmed cell death-1 antibodies, has revolutionized the treatment paradigm for esophageal cancer. Since demonstrating promising efficacy with manageable safety in several clinical trials, ICIs has finally reached the point where they can be used in various tumor stages in the clinical setting. ICIs are most promising treatments that can be expected to improve the prognosis in patients with esophageal cancer now and in the future. This review outlines the mechanisms, results of clinical trials, and prospects for future studies of ICIs in esophageal cancer. It also discusses clinical questions and challenges in the therapeutic development of ICIs.

The continuum of care of anticancer treatment-induced hypothyroidism in patients with solid non thyroid tumors: time for an intimate collaboration between oncologists and endocrinologists

INTRODUCTION

Hypothyroidism is a common adverse event of various anticancer treatment modalities, constituting a notable paradigm of the integration of the endocrine perspective into precision oncology.

AREAS COVERED

The present narrative review provides a comprehensive and updated overview of anticancer treatment-induced hypothyroidism in patients with solid non-thyroid tumors. A study search was conducted on the following electronic databases: PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus.com, ClinicalTrials.gov, and European Union Clinical Trials Register from 2011 until August 2021.

EXPERT OPINION

In patients with solid non-thyroid tumors, hypothyroidism is a common adverse event of radiotherapy, high dose interleukin 2 (HD IL-2), interferon alpha (IFN-α), bexarotene, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPi), and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), while chemotherapy may induce hypothyroidism more often than initially considered. The path forward for the management of anticancer treatment-induced hypothyroidism in patients with solid non-thyroid tumors is an integrated approach grounded on 5 pillars: prevention, vigilance, diagnosis, treatment and monitoring. Current challenges concerning anticancer treatment-induced hypothyroidism await counteraction, namely awareness of the growing list of related anticancer treatments, identification of predictive factors, counteraction of diagnostic pitfalls, tuning of thyroid hormone replacement, and elucidation of its prognostic significance. Close collaboration of oncologists with endocrinologists will provide optimal patient care.

Plasma Exchange for Severe Immune-Related Adverse Events from Checkpoint Inhibitors: An Early Window of Opportunity?

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment of several advanced malignancies leading to durable remission in a subset of patients. Their rapidly expanding use has led to an increased frequency of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). The pathogenesis of irAEs is poorly understood but may involve aberrant activation of T cells leading to inflammatory cytokine release or production of pathogenic antibodies leading to organ damage. Severe irAEs can be extremely debilitating and, in some cases, life threatening. IrAEs may not always be corticosteroid responsive or may require excessively high, often toxic, corticosteroid doses. Therapeutic plasma exchange (PLEX) is a treatment modality that has shown promising results for the management of certain severe irAEs, including irAEs that are not mentioned in current treatment guidelines. PLEX may attenuate ongoing irAEs and prevent delayed irAEs by accelerating clearance of the ICI, or by acutely removing pathogenic antibodies, cytokines, and chemokines. Here, we summarize examples from the literature in which PLEX was successfully used for the treatment of irAEs. We posit that timing may be a critical factor and that earlier utilization of PLEX for life-threatening irAEs may result in more favorable outcomes. In individuals at high risk for irAEs, the availability of PLEX as a potential therapeutic mitigation strategy may encourage life-saving ICI use or rechallenge. Future research will be critical to better define which indications are most amenable to PLEX, particularly to establish the optimal place in the sequence of irAE therapies and to assess the ramifications of ICI removal on cancer outcomes.

Real-World Adherence to Toxicity Management Guidelines for Immune-Related Adverse Events

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) affect immunologic homeostasis, leading to immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Early irAE detection and management can prevent significant morbidity and mortality. A retrospective chart review was performed to characterize irAEs associated with nivolumab, ipilimumab, and nivolumab plus ipilimumab in adult medical oncology patients in Nova Scotia Health-Central Zone from 2013–2020, and to describe adherence to toxicity management guidelines. Diarrhea/colitis, hepatitis, pneumonitis, nephrotoxicity, and cardiotoxicity were studied. Of 129 charts reviewed, 67 patients (51.9%) experienced at least one irAE for a total of 98 irAEs and a 1.5% fatality rate. Of these irAEs, 33.7% led to an emergency room visit. Patients were admitted to hospital and steroids were used in 24.5% and 35.7% of cases, respectively. In 17.3% of irAEs, ICIs were permanently discontinued. In 20.4% of irAEs, ICIs were held, and patients were monitored; while in 18.4%, ICIs were held until the irAE was Grade 0–1 (and until steroids were tapered). Almost 47% of irAEs were managed according to guidelines (14.3% were not), and 38.8% had no documented management. Patients receiving immunotherapy frequently experience irAEs with half of irAEs having documented management adhering to guidelines. As immunotherapy indications expand, it is important to ensure irAEs are documented and managed appropriately.

Adverse Events Associated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Overview of Systematic Reviews

BACKGROUND

Recognition and management of adverse events (AEs) associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) use by cancer patients requires expertise from multiple disciplines. Greater awareness of potential AEs may result in earlier recognition, appropriate management, and better patient outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of this overview of systematic reviews was to synthesize and consolidate systematic review evidence describing the incidence proportion and severity of AEs associated with various ICI therapies across different cancers.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of four databases was conducted to identify systematic reviews that describe the incidence proportion and severity of AEs related to ICI therapy in cancer patients. A systematic review was eligible if it included adults with cancer; on ICI alone or in combination with another ICI, chemotherapy, or targeted therapy; severity (graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) and incidence proportion of AEs and whether it reported its eligibility criteria. AEs of interest were identified through an iterative ranking exercise by key stakeholders and knowledge users. Extraction of PICOTTS elements and quality indicators (AMSTAR-2) were used to manage overlap of primary studies across systematic reviews at the outcome level. Cancer subtypes were mapped to drug class and AE severity.

RESULTS

Overall, 129 systematic reviews met the inclusion criteria for data mapping. Systematic reviews reported incidence proportions for more than 76 AEs, of which 34 were identified as AEs of interest. After overlap assessment, 65 systematic reviews were chosen for data extraction. The three AEs with the highest median incidence were fatigue (18.3%, interquartile range [IQR] 15.0-28.0%), diarrhea (15.3%, IQR 9.7-29.2%) and rash (14.4%, IQR 10.3-19.2%). The three AEs (high-grade) with the highest median incidence were diarrhea (1.5%, IQR 1.2-6.0%), colitis (1.3%, IQR 0.6-6.1%) and neutropenia (1.2%, IQR 0.4-3.3%). Incidence proportions of high-grade AEs were often considerably lower than all-grade AEs and combination therapy (ICI combinations or combinations of ICI with chemotherapy or targeted therapy) was responsible for some of the highest incidence proportions regardless of AE. Rare AEs and certain cancer subtypes were not well reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Early recognition of AEs associated with ICIs requires expertise from diverse specialists, not just oncologists. Greater awareness of potential AEs may result in earlier recognition, appropriate management, and better patient outcomes.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION

CRD42021231593.

Advances in Knowledge and Management of Immune-Related Adverse Events in Cancer Immunotherapy

Immune-oncologic (IO) therapy has revolutionized the treatment and management of oncologic disease. Immunotherapy functions by enhancing the host immune-systems ability to endogenously clear malignant cells, however, this activation can also lead to immune-mediated damage to healthy native tissues. These side effects are known as immune-related adverse events or irAEs and can even present with phenotypes similar to autoimmune diseases. IrAEs are the major consequence of checkpoint inhibitors and can have a significant impact on a patient's cancer treatment and long-term quality of life. The management of these irAEs follows a similar approach to autoimmune diseases. More specifically, the management is akin to that of autoimmune disease exacerbations. While there is an array of immune-suppressing agents that can be used, steroids, immunomodulators and IO discontinuation are cornerstones of irAE management. The exact approach and dosing are based on the severity and subtype of irAE presented. Within recent years, there has been a push to better prevent and manage irAEs when they arise. There has been an additional effort to increase the number of steroid-sparing agents available for irAE treatment given the consequences of long-term steroid therapy as well as patient contraindications to steroids. The goals of this review are to summarize irAE management, highlight significant advances made in recent years and emphasize the future directions that will optimize the use of IO therapy in oncology.

Defining the correlation between immune-checkpoint inhibitors-related adverse events and clinical outcomes: a narrative review

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have increased modern anticancer armamentarium portfolios, with 15%-60% of cancer patients deriving clinical benefit while others progress, including some occurrences of accelerated progressions. ICIs have also introduced a new pattern of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Recently, a mechanistic link was proposed in which patients who develop ICIs-related irAEs derive a survival benefit compared to those who do not, suggesting an overlap between toxicities and the treatment efficacy. Identifying predictive biomarkers to optimally identify patients who will benefit from ICIs is a contemporary research area in Oncology. However, the data remains sparse, with only several smaller studies showing a plausible direct proportionality of a therapeutic effect across tumours. In contrast, the overall survival and progression-free survival rate depend on the tumour type, degree of toxicities, duration of exposure, affected system/organs and inherent patient characteristics. Furthermore, the occurrence of irAEs appears to be more associated with a clinical benefit from programmed death 1 and programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitors than anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4. Several questions remain unanswered, including the association between survival benefit and specific type of organ system toxicities, toxicity grade, if the benefit is entirely due to immortal-time biases (ITBs), presence of patients confounding comorbidities like autoimmune diseases, and finally, immune heterogeneities. Considering ITB represents a key element in interpreting these studies since patients with precipitated death or with an earlier disease progresses rarely develop irAEs; in fact, such patients have not stayed in the study long enough to experience such irAEs. Conversely, patients that stayed in the study for a longer period have a higher risk of developing irAEs. Landmark analysis is key in these studies if a real association is to be found. Overall response and disease control rates are mainly higher in those who develop irAEs due to immune activation. So, this review aims to summarise the evidence from key studies that addressed this important clinical question.

The Continuum of Thyroid Disorders Related to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Still Many Pending Queries

BACKGROUND

Until more data are available to shed light on the thyroid disorders related to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPi) implemented for the treatment of hematological malignancies, the decision-making is guided by pertinent data derived mostly from solid tumors.

METHODS

The present review provides a comprehensive and updated overview of the thyroid disorders related to ICPi, namely to inhibitors of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death (PD) 1 (PD-1), and the ligand of the latter (PD-L1).

RESULTS

With the increasing recognition of ir thyroid disorders, many outstanding issues have emerged. Ir thyroid disorders are reminiscent of, but not identical to, thyroid autoimmunity. Interclass and intraclass ICPi differences regarding thyroid immunotoxicity await interpretation. The available data concerning the predictive value of thyroid autoantibodies for the development of ir thyroid disorders are inconclusive. Mounting data indicate an association of ir thyroid disorders with ICPi efficacy, but a causative link is still lacking. The path forward is a tailored approach, entailing: (i) the validation of tumor-specific, patient-specific, and ICPi-specific predictive factors; (ii) appropriate patient selection; (iii) the uncoupling of antitumor immunity from immunotoxicity; (iv) a multidisciplinary initiative; and (v) global registry strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

Untangling and harnessing the interrelationship of immuno-oncology with endocrinology underlying the ir thyroid disorders will yield the optimal patient care.

Differential Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Checkpoint Inhibitor Monotherapy and Combination Therapy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials

Background: As immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) transition to the forefront of cancer treatment, a better understanding of immune related adverse events (IRAEs) is essential to promote safe clinical practice. Dermatologic adverse events are the most common IRAEs and can lead to drug withdrawal and decreased quality of life. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the risk of the most prevalent dermatologic adverse events (pruritus and rash) among various ICI treatment regimens.

Methods: A systematic search of electronic databases was performed to identify qualified randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Data for any grade and high grade pruritus and rash were extracted for meta-analysis. Two reviewers independently assessed methodological quality. The relative risk summary and 95% confidence interval were calculated.

Results: 50 RCTs involving 29941 patients were analyzed. The risk of pruritus (2.15 and 4.21 relative risk respectively) and rash (1.61 and 3.89 relative risk respectively) developing from CTLA-4 or PD-1/-L1 inhibitor were increased compared to placebo, but this effect was not dose-dependent. PD-1/-L1 plus CTLA-4 inhibitor was associated with increased risk of pruritus (1.76 and 0.98 relative risk respectively) and rash (1.72 and 1.37 relative risk respectively) compared to either monotherapy. Compared with CTLA-4 inhibitor, PD-1/-L1 inhibitor had a significantly decreased risk of pruritus and rash in both monotherapy and combination therapy (0.65 and 0.29 relative risk respectively). No significant difference was found between PD-1/-L1 inhibitor combined with chemotherapy and PD-1/-L1 monotherapy in any grade and high grade rash (0.84 and 1.43 relative risk respectively). In subgroup analyses, PD-1 inhibitor was associated with reduced risk of pruritus and rash compared to PD-L1 inhibitor.

Conclusion: Our meta-analysis demonstrates a better safety profile for PD-1/-L1 inhibitor compared to CTLA-4 inhibitor in terms of pruritus and rash among both monotherapy and multiple combination therapies. PD-L1 inhibitor may contribute to an increased risk of pruritus and rash compared to PD-1 inhibitor.

Treatment-related adverse events of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitor-based combination therapies in clinical trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Numerous ongoing trials are testing anti-PD-1-based or anti-PD-L1-based cancer treatment combinations. Understanding the toxicity profiles of treatment-related adverse events is essential. The aim of this study was to comprehensively investigate the incidences and profiles of treatment-related adverse events across different combination therapies.

METHODS

We did a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing different chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and radiotherapy combinations with PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors. We searched Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for articles published in English between Jan 1, 2000, and May 21, 2020, investigating globally approved PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor-based combination therapies. Only prospective trials reporting overall incidence or tabulated data of treatment-related adverse events were included. Trials investigating sequential therapies, comprising three or more classes of therapies, and enrolling less than ten patients were excluded. The primary outcomes were overall incidences and profiles for all-grade and grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events by random-effect models. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed with I² statistics. The summary measures for main outcomes are incidences (95% CI). The 95% CI were calculated together with the incidence through a random-effects model with a logit transformation. The protocol is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020189617).

FINDINGS

We identified 2540 records, of which 161 studies (17 197 patients) met the inclusion criteria. The overall incidence of treatment-related adverse events in the chemotherapy combination was 97·7% (95% CI 96·4-98·5; I²=75%) for all-grade adverse events and 68·3% (60·7-75·0; I²=93%) for grade 3 or higher adverse events; in the targeted therapy combination was 94·5% (90·7-96·8; I²=86%) for all-grade adverse events and 47·3% (37·3-57·5; I²=93%) for grade 3 or higher adverse events; in the immunotherapy combination was 86·8% (80·9-91·1; I²=94%) for all-grade adverse events and 35·9% (29·5-42·9; I²=92%) for grade 3 or higher adverse events; and in the radiotherapy combination was 89·4% (69·0-96·9; I²=74%) for all-grade adverse events and 12·4% (4·4-30·6; I²=73%) for grade 3 or higher adverse events. For these four combination therapies, the most common all-grade adverse events were anaemia (45.4% [95% CI 32·4-59·1]), fatigue (34·3% [27·5-41·9]), fatigue (26·4% [19·2-35·2]), and dysphagia (30·0% [18·7-44·5]), respectively, and the most common grade 3 or higher adverse events were neutropenia (19·6% [13·5-27·7]), hypertension (9·3% [5·7-14·9]), lipase increased (7·2% [5·2-9·9]), and lymphopenia (10·3% [4·5-21·8]). All included randomised controlled trials had a low risk of bias.

INTERPRETATION

Our study provides comprehensive data on treatment-related adverse events of different PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor-based combination therapies. Our results provide an essential reference of toxicity profiles of PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor-based combination therapies for clinicians in routine practice of cancer care.

FUNDING

National Key Research and Development Programme, National Natural Science Foundation of China key program, National Natural Science Foundation of China general program, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Initiative for Innovative Medicine, Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission, Non-profit Central Research Institute Fund.

Clinical Course and Treatment Implications of Combination Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Mediated Hepatitis: A Multicentre Cohort

Background

Immune-related adverse events can occur after treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), limiting treatment persistence. We aimed to evaluate the clinical course of ICI-mediated hepatitis (IMH) associated with combination ipilimumab and nivolumab treatment.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study including consecutive patients with metastatic melanoma treated with ipilimumab and nivolumab between 2013 and 2018 was conducted at two tertiary care centres. IMH was defined by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). We determined the proportion of patients developing IMH, and compared the duration, treatment patterns and outcomes, stratified by hepatitis severity. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was used to evaluate time to hepatitis resolution, and a linear mixed-effects model was used to compare longitudinal outcomes by treatment.

Results

A total of 63 patients were included. Thirty-two patients (51%) developed IMH (34% Grade 1–2, 66% Grade 3–4), at a median of 34 days (IQR 20 to 43.5 days) after the first dose. Baseline FIB4 index ≥1.45 was associated with IMH (OR 3.71 [95% CI: 1.03 to 13.38], P = 0.04). Ninety-four per cent (30/32) of patients had liver enzyme normalization after a median duration of 43 days (IQR 26 to 70 days). Corticosteroid use was not associated with faster IMH resolution or less ICI discontinuation. A total of 24 patients died during the study; no deaths were attributable to hepatitis-related complications. Fifty-three per cent (17/32) of patients resumed anti-PD-1 monotherapy and three patients developed IMH recurrence.

Conclusions

Approximately half of the patients treated with combination ipilimumab and nivolumab developed IMH in this cohort. However, most patients experienced uncomplicated IMH resolution.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Associated Hepatotoxicity in Primary Liver Cancer Versus Other Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Overall risks of hepatotoxicity with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have yet to be compared in primary liver cancers to other solid tumors.

METHODS

We reviewed data from the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases, and assessed the risk of hepatotoxicity associated with ICIs.

RESULTS

A total of 117 trials were eligible for the meta-analysis, including 7 trials with primary liver cancers. The most common hepatotoxicity was ALT elevation (incidence of all grade 5.29%, 95% CI 4.52-6.20) and AST elevation (incidence of all grade 5.88%, 95% CI 4.96-6.97). The incidence of all grade ALT and AST elevation was 6.01% and 6.84% for anti-PD-1 (95% CI 5.04-7.18/5.69-8.25) and 3.60% and 3.72% for anti-PD-L1 (95% CI 2.72-4.76/2.82-4.94; p< 0.001/p<0.001). The incidence of ≥ grade 3 ALT and AST elevation was 1.54% and 1.48% for anti-PD-1 (95% CI 1.19-1.58/1.07-2.04) and 1.03% and 1.08% for anti-PD-L1 (95% CI 0.71-1.51/0.80-1.45; p= 0.002/p<0.001). The incidence of all grade ALT and AST elevation was 13.3% and 14.2% in primary liver cancers (95% CI 11.1-16.0 and 9.93-20.36) vs. 4.92% and 5.38% in other solid tumors (95% CI 4.21-5.76 and 4.52-5.76 in other solid tumors; p <0.001/p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our study indicates that anti-PD-1 is associated with a higher risk of all- and high-grade hepatotoxicity compared to anti-PD-L1, and primary liver cancers are associated with a higher risk of all- and high-grade hepatotoxicity compared to other solid tumors.

Organ-specific Adverse Events of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy, with Special Reference to Endocrinopathies

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are potent and promising immunotherapeutic agents that are increasingly used for the management of various types of advanced cancers. The widespread approval of this group of drugs simultaneously revealed immune-related adverse events as unique side-effects. Endocrinopathies are one of the most common immune-related adverse events. The precise pathogenic mechanisms for these endocrinopathies are still unclear. Though few of the endocrinopathies are reversible, calling for only symptom control, most are irreversible, requiring multiple long-term hormone replacement therapies. However, in contrast to other organ-specific immune-related adverse events, patients with endocrinopathies can continue their immune checkpoint therapy, provided the hormone replacement therapy is adequate and the symptoms are controlled. Though patients who have developed immune-related adverse events demonstrate superior antitumor activity and overall survival, due to the high morbidity associated with the immune-related adverse events, researchers are trying to uncouple the antitumour activity associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy from the immune-related adverse events, to preserve antitumour activity without adverse events.

Inflammatory and immune checkpoint markers are associated with the severity of aortic stenosis

Objective

Aortic stenosis (AS) is a disease characterized by narrowing of the aortic valve (AV) orifice. In relation to this disease, the purpose of this study was to elucidate the relationships among factors such as expression of programmed cell death-1 ligand (PD-L1, which is the ligand of PD-1 protein; together, they play a central role in the inhibition of T lymphocyte function), clinicopathologic characteristics, infiltrating immune cells, and disease severity.

Methods

We performed immunohistochemical analysis on the surgically-resected AVs of 53 patients with AS. We used the resultant data to identify relationships among PD-L1 expression, disease severity, and the infiltration of immune cells including cluster of differentiation (CD8)-positive T lymphocytes, cluster of differentiation 163 (CD163)-positive macrophages, and forkhead box protein 3 (FOXP3)-positive regulatory T lymphocytes (Tregs).

Results

PD-L1 expression in resected AVs was significantly associated with being nonsmoker, valve calcification, and the infiltration of CD8-positive T cells and CD163-positive macrophages. Disease severity and valve calcification were significantly associated with low infiltration of FOXP3-positive Tregs and high infiltration of CD8-positive T cells and CD163-positive macrophages. Moreover, calcified AVs with high PD-L1 expression showed active inflammation without FOXP3-positive Tregs but with high levels of CD8-positive T lymphocytes and CD163-positive macrophages.

Conclusions

Immune cell infiltration in the AVs and expression of the immune checkpoint protein PD-L1 were associated with the calcification of AS and disease severity.

Fatal Adverse Events Associated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have previously been reported to have a promising potential in terms of the improvement of outcomes in non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Fatal adverse events (FAEs) of ICIs are relatively uncommon, and the incidence and risk in NSCLC remain unclear. In the present study, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the risk of FAEs in NSCLC patients administered with ICIs.

Methods: Potentially relevant studies were identified in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library database from inception to September 16, 2020. The systematic review and meta-analysis included randomized controlled trials that reported treatment-related FAEs in NSCLC. The pooled incidence and risk ratios (RRs) were calculated to evaluate prospective risk.

Results: Twenty clinical trials that included a total of 13,483 patients were selected for the meta-analysis. The overall incidence of FAEs was 0.65% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.31–1.07, I² = 50.2%] in ICI monotherapy, 1.17% (95% CI = 0.74–1.69, I² = 56.3%) in chemotherapy, and 2.01% (95% CI = 1.42–2.69, I² = 5.9%) in the combination therapy (ICI and chemotherapy). ICI monotherapy was associated with lower incidence of FAEs caused by blood system disorders (RR = 0.23, 95% CI = 0.07–0.73, P = 0.013, I² = 0%) and infectious diseases (RR = 0.29, 95% CI = 0.13–0.63, P = 0.002, I² = 0%). The incidence of pneumonitis significantly increased in immunotherapy (RR = 5.72, 95% CI = 1.14–28.80, P = 0.03, I² = 0%).

Conclusions: The results of the present study demonstrate that ICI monotherapy decreases the risk of FAEs, whereas the combined regimens with chemotherapy have the opposite tendency as compared to conventional chemotherapy. While the patients who received chemotherapy suffered the risks of death mainly from myelosuppression and infection, those who received immunotherapy were mainly threatened by immune-related pneumonitis.

Case Report: Pseudoprogression With Nivolumab and Bevacizumab Followed by Recurrent Immune-Related Pneumonitis in Urothelial Carcinoma With Lung Metastasis

Background

Combination therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and antiangiogenic agents is generally effective and well tolerated and might be effective for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC). However, ICI treatment is often associated with unique responses, such as pseudoprogression and ICI-related pneumonitis (CIP), which may influence clinical decision making and affect treatment. Although there have been many studies on the mechanism of pseudoprogression and CIP, the characteristics and relationship of these special events in a clinical setting remain rarely reported.

Case Presentation

Here, we present a patient with lung metastatic UC who underwent surgery and two lines of chemotherapy. The programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor nivolumab and antiangiogenics agent bevacizumab were used as maintenance treatments. The patient experienced pseudoprogression after 2 PD-1 inhibitor cycles. The lesions in both lungs were enlarged on computed tomography (CT) imaging, and treatments were continued for another two cycles, after which the tumor size decreased to below baseline, followed by a durable response. However, after 4 months of pseudoprogression, the patient then developed CIP. The CIP was responsive to glucocorticoid therapy but recurred during ICI rechallenge, leading to the termination of immune therapy. Ultimately, the patient achieved durable, stable disease for over 18 months without further anticancer treatment.

Conclusions

Our case shows that pseudoprogression can occur in UC during immunotherapy even when combined with an effective antiangiogenic agent. In addition, pseudoprogression may be correlated with future adverse effects and a durable response. In the management of CIP, early rechallenge with ICIs may lead to CIP recurrence, which could be more severe and needs to be treated early and with appropriate drugs. Clinicians should be aware of atypical responses to ICIs and adjust the treatment plan accordingly.

Organ-specific Adverse Events of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy, with Special Reference to Endocrinopathies

Collapse

Immunostimulatory Effects of Radiotherapy for Local and Systemic Control of Melanoma: A Review

Recently, modern therapies involving immune checkpoint inhibitors, cytokines, and oncolytic virus have been developed. Because of the limited treatment effect of modern therapy alone, the immunostimulatory effect of radiotherapy attracted increasing attention. The combined use of radiotherapy and modern therapy has been examined clinically and non-clinically, and its effectiveness has been confirmed recently. Because melanomas have high immunogenicity, better therapeutic outcomes are desired when using immunotherapy. However, sufficient therapeutic effects have not yet been achieved. Thus far, radiotherapy has been used only for local control of tumors. Although extremely rare, radiotherapy has also been reported for systemic control, i.e., abscopal effect. This is thought to be due to an antitumor immune response. Therefore, we herein summarize past information on not only the mechanism of immune effects on radiotherapy but also biomarkers reported in case reports on abscopal effects. We also reviewed the animal model suitable for evaluating abscopal effects. These results pave the way for further basic research or clinical studies on new treatment methods for melanoma. Currently, palliative radiation is administered to patients with metastatic melanoma for local control. If it is feasible to provide both systemic and local control, the treatment benefit for the patients is very large.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Related Pneumonitis

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are novel agents that have been proved efficacious in a variety of cancer types, but they are associated with a unique set of organ-specific, immune-related adverse events. Among them, immune-related pneumonitis requires special attention because it is difficult to diagnose and potentially lethal. Accumulating real-world epidemiological data suggest that immune-related pneumonitis is more frequent than previously reported. Its diagnosis requires exclusion of other causes and assessment of radiographic features on high-resolution CT of the chest. Management of immune-related pneumonitis is based on the use of immunosuppressants. Future research should be focused on finding predictive biomarkers for immune-related pneumonitis as well as optimizing its management.

Immune manifestations with checkpoint inhibitors in a single Brazilian center: experience and literature review

Objectives

The presence of autoimmune events were recorded in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Materials & Methods

Retrospective study in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) during the period of 2012-2019.

Results

A total of 554 patients received ICIs of which 123 developed an immune related adverse event. Twenty one (17%) with toxicity were identified as having a pre-existing autoimmune disease and 88 required treatment with corticosteroids or hormone replacement. Thirty two (26%) out of 123 had to temporarily discontinue ICIs due to autoimmune manifestations. Endocrine and skin manifestations were the most prevalent immune disorders in our cohort. In melanoma better efficacy was seen in patients with immune toxicity.

Conclusion

Autoimmune diseases appear in patients receiving ICIs in this real world experience. Our results differ from other series on the frequency of autoimmunity. Complete discontinuation of ICIs due to autoimmunity was rare.

Feasibility of Integrating a Mobile Decision-Support App into a Multicomponent CME Initiative: Developing Clinician Competence at the Point of Care

Mobile health (mHealth) technologies such as smartphone applications are increasingly being adopted in the healthcare setting to support the delivery of evidence-based care. Given the approaching ubiquity of mHealth tools in medical practice, it is incumbent on the continuing medical education (CME) community to understand how these tools can be leveraged to develop clinician knowledge and competence, and how we can assess these educational outcomes. In this report, we describe our experience developing and incorporating a mobile decision-support tool into multiple activity formats within the European Immuno-Oncology Clinic Companion CME initiative.

Managing Ipilimumab-Induced Hypophysitis: Challenges and Current Therapeutic Strategies

Over the past years, progress has been made in cancer immunotherapy following the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) that have been proved effective in the management of many malignancies. Ipilimumab, a monoclonal antibody against cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4), has been approved for the treatment of advanced melanoma but has been associated with the development of several endocrine immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Hypophysitis is the most common endocrine irAE related to ipilimumab with a reported incidence ranging from 1.8% to 17%. The mechanism underlying ipilimumab-induced hypophysitis implicates immune, inflammatory and genetic factors, but there are still some points that are not well understood and remain to be elucidated. The diagnosis is based mainly on clinical, biochemical and imaging data. The majority of patients display multiple hormone deficiencies that may recover or persist for a prolonged period of time with corticotroph deficiency usually being permanent. Immune-related hypopituitarism is treated with replacement of deficient hormones while in severe forms of hypophysitis treatment with high-dose glucocorticoids may be required. Proper evaluation and registration of patients in clinical trials and further investigation are needed to precisely clarify the pathophysiology of the ICI-related hypophysitis, define predictive factors and ameliorate the management and outcome of the disease.

Safety, efficacy and prognostic impact of immune checkpoint inhibitors in older patients with genitourinary cancers

INTRODUCTION

Immunosenescence might impact immunotherapy (IT) in patients with advanced age. However, pivotal studies were not powered for this clinical question. Our aim is to explore toxicity (primary objective) and activity (secondary objective) of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with renal cell (RCC) and urothelial carcinoma (UC) older than 75 years compared to the younger population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients treated at our tertiary care Uro-oncology Department with atezolizumab, pembrolizumab, nivolumab or ipilimumab were retrospectively analyzed. Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were determined and graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v.4.0). Disease Control rate (DCR) was assessed according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.1). IrAEs and DCR were compared between patients ≥75 vs. <75 years, chi-squared test. Impact of age and other key clinical parameters on irAEs and DCR were tested in a binary logistic regression employing a backward selection. Impact of irAEs on oncological prognosis was assessed in log-rank and Cox regression analyses.

RESULTS

We included 99 patients treated between 11/2015 and 01/2019. Frequency of irAEs (36.4% vs. 39.4%) and DCR (59.4% vs. 41.0%) was comparable between patients ≥75 vs. <75 years. Advanced age was not associated with irAEs or worse DCR. IrAEs occurrence correlated with better disease-specific survival in the univariate and multivariate analyses. IrAEs could be successfully treated with corticosteroids in 78.9% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

ICIs seem to be both safe and efficacious in an aging population with metastatic RCC or UC. Occurrence of irAEs predicted better prognosis.

Biological Factors behind Melanoma Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Modern immunotherapy together with targeted therapy has revolutionized the treatment of advanced melanoma. Inhibition of immune checkpoints significantly improved the median overall survival and gave hope to many melanoma patients. However, this treatment has three serious drawbacks: high cost, serious side effects, and an effectiveness limited only to approximately 50% of patients. Some patients do not derive any or short-term benefit from this treatment due to primary or secondary resistance. The response to immunotherapy depends on many factors that fall into three main categories: those associated with melanoma cells, those linked to a tumor and its microenvironment, and those classified as individual ontogenic and physiological features of the patient. The first category comprises expression of PD-L1 and HLA proteins on melanoma cells as well as genetic/genomic metrics such as mutational load, (de)activation of specific signaling pathways and epigenetic factors. The second category is the inflammatory status of the tumor: “hot” versus “cold” (i.e., high versus low infiltration of immune cells). The third category comprises metabolome and single nucleotide polymorphisms of specific genes. Here we present up-to-date data on those biological factors influencing melanoma response to immunotherapy with a special focus on signaling pathways regulating the complex process of anti-tumor immune response. We also discuss their potential predictive capacity.