Association between antihypertensive drugs and oral cancer: a drug target Mendelian randomization study

Causal associations of MICB, CTSA, and MMP9 proteins with oral cancer: Mendelian randomization study

Oral cancer (ORCA) is the most prevalent histological subtype of oral malignancies in which immune modulation is relevant. The goal of this work was to employ Mendelian randomization (MR) to investigate the causal connection between the immune-related proteins MICB, CTSA, MMP9, and ORCA. The Open GWAS database of the Integrative Epidemiology Unit (IEU) was accessed to collect GWAS data for ORCA (ieu-b-4961), MICB (prot-a-1898), CTSA (prot-a-717) and MMP9 (prot-a-1921). From 372,373 samples, the ORCA dataset comprises 7,723,107 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). MICB, CTSA, and MMP9 all have 10,534,735 SNPs and 3,301 sample sizes. Then, the primary SVMR implementation approaches were weighted mode, simple mode, inverse variance weighted (IVW), weighted median, and MR-Egger. IVW was the most effective technique. A sensitivity study was also carried out to assess the correctness of SVMR data, with special focus devoted to heterogeneity, horizontal pleiotropy, and Leave-One-Out (LOO). MVMR was eventually implemented as well. A Mendelian randomization analysis of the three exposure factors in the dataset (ieu-b-94, ebi-a-GCST012237) was also performed to validate the study results. According to the SVMR results, there was a noteworthy causal interaction between ORCA and MICB (P = 0.0014), MMP9 (P = 0.0343), and CTSA (P = 0.0003). Furthermore, odds ratios (ORs) values revealed that MMP9 (OR = 1.0005) was an ORCA risk factor, whereas MICB (OR = 0.9994) and CTSA (OR = 0.9993) were security factors. The robustness of the SVMR findings was confirmed by the p-values of the heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropy, both of which were greater than 0.05. The MVMR result did not affect any of the safety or hazard features of these three exposure factors. However, the P value for MMP9 was greater than 0.05, implying that MICB and CTSA may have a greater influence on ORCA than MMP9. The validation outcomes in both datasets harmonized with the findings from previous research, thereby solidifying the reliability of results. Our investigation provided a crucial resource for further research on the subject by demonstrating a causal relationship between ORCA and MICB, CTSA, and MMP9.

The causal relationship between anti-diabetic drugs and gastrointestinal disorders: a drug-targeted mendelian randomization study

BACKGROUND

The incidence of diabetic gastrointestinal diseases is increasing year by year. This study aimed to investigate the causal relationship between antidiabetic medications and gastrointestinal disorders, with the goal of reducing the incidence of diabetes-related gastrointestinal diseases and exploring the potential repurposing of antidiabetic drugs.

METHODS

We employed a two-sample Mendelian randomization (TSMR) design to investigate the causal association between antidiabetic medications and gastrointestinal disorders, including gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), gastric ulcer (GU), chronic gastritis, acute gastritis, Helicobacter pylori infection, gastric cancer (GC), functional dyspepsia (FD), irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), ulcerative colitis (UC), Crohn's disease (CD), diverticulosis, and colorectal cancer (CRC). To identify potential inhibitors of antidiabetic drug targets, we collected single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with metformin, GLP-1 receptor agonists, SGLT2 inhibitors, DPP-4 inhibitors, insulin, and its analogs, thiazolidinediones, sulfonylureas, and alpha-glucosidase inhibitors from published genome-wide association study statistics. We then conducted a drug-target Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis using inverse variance weighting (IVW) as the primary analytical method to assess the impact of these inhibitors on gastrointestinal disorders. Additionally, diabetes was selected as a positive control.

RESULTS

Sulfonylureas were found to significantly reduce the risk of CD (IVW: OR [95% CI] = 0.986 [0.978, 0.995], p = 1.99 × 10- 3), GERD (IVW: OR [95% CI] = 0.649 [0.452, 0.932], p = 1.90 × 10- 2), and chronic gastritis (IVW: OR [95% CI] = 0.991 [0.982, 0.999], p = 4.50 × 10- 2). However, they were associated with an increased risk of GU development (IVW: OR [95%CI] = 2 0.761 [1.259, 6.057], p = 1 0.12 × 10- 2).

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicated that sulfonylureas had a positive effect on the prevention of CD, GERD, and chronic gastritis but a negative effect on the development of gastric ulcers. However, our research found no causal evidence for the impact of metformin, GLP-1 agonists, SGLT2 inhibitors, DPP 4 inhibitors, insulin and its analogs, thiazolidinediones, or alpha-glucosidase inhibitors on gastrointestinal diseases.

A causal association between lipid-lowering medications and rotator cuff syndrome: a drug-targeted mendelian randomization study

Background: Previous research has suggested that dyslipidemia may be a risk factor for rotator cuff syndrome (RCS), and lipid-lowering drugs may aid in its treatment, though conclusions have not been definitive. Mendelian randomization is a statistical method that explores the causal relationships between exposure factors and diseases. It overcomes the confounding issues inherent in traditional observational studies, thereby providing more reliable causal inferences. We employed this method to investigate whether hyperlipidemia is a risk factor for rotator cuff syndrome and whether lipid-lowering drugs can effectively treat this condition. Methods: Genetic variations linked to lipid traits low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), triglyceride (TG), and total cholesterol (TC) were acquired from the UK Biobank and the Global Lipids Genetics Consortium (GLGC). Data on genetic variation in rotator cuff syndrome were obtained from FinnGen, including 24,061 patients and 275,212 controls. In the next step, we carried out two-sample Mendelian randomization analyses to determine whether lipid traits correlate with rotator cuff syndrome risk. Additionally, we performed drug-target Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses on 10 drug targets related to rotator cuff syndrome. For the drug targets that showed significant results, further analysis was done using Summary-data-based Mendelian Randomization (SMR) and colocalization techniques. We performed a mediation analysis to identify potential mediators between HMG-CoA reductase (HMGCR) and RCS. Results: No causative link was established between these lipid traits and rotator cuff syndrome. However, a significant association has been identified where HMGCR inhibition corresponds to a reduced risk of rotator cuff disease (OR = 0.68, [95% CI, 0.56-0.83], p = 1.510 × 10-4). Additionally, enhanced expression of HMGCR in muscle tissues is also linked to a decreased risk of rotator cuff syndrome (OR = 0.88, [95% CI, 0.76-0.99], p = 0.03). Body mass index (BMI) mediated 22.97% of the total effect of HMGCR on RCS. Conclusion: This study does not support low-density LDL-C, TG, and TC as risk factors for rotator cuff syndrome. HMGCR represents a potential pharmaceutical target for preventing and treating rotator cuff syndrome. The protective action of statins on the rotator cuff syndrome might not be associated with their lipid-lowering properties.

Exploring the causal relationship between antihypertensive drugs and glioblastoma by combining drug target Mendelian randomization study, eQTL colocalization, and single-cell RNA sequencing

Recent reports indicate a potential oncogenic role of antihypertensive drugs in common cancers. However, it remains uncertain whether this phenomenon influences the risk of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). This study aimed to assess the potential causal effects of blood pressure (BP) and antihypertensive drugs on GBM. Genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics for systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and GBM in Europeans were downloaded. To represent the effects of antihypertensive drugs, we utilized single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with SBP/DBP adjacent to the coding regions of different antihypertensive drugs as instrumental variables to model five antihypertensive drugs, including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, calcium channel blockers, β-receptor blockers (BBs), and thiazide diuretics. Positive control studies were performed using GWAS data in chronic heart failure. The primary method for causality estimation was the inverse-variance-weighted method. Mendelian randomization analysis showed that BBs with the β1-adrenergic receptor (ADRB1) as a therapeutic target could significantly reduce the risk of GBM by mediating DBP (OR = 0.431, 95% CI: 0.267-0.697, p < .001) and that they could also significantly reduce the risk of GBM by mediating SBP (OR = 0.595, 95% CI: 0.422-0.837, p = .003). Sensitivity analysis and colocalization analysis reinforced the robustness of these findings. Finally, the low expression of the ADRB1 gene in malignant gliomas was found by GBM data from TCGA and single-cell RNA sequencing, which most likely contributed to the poor prognosis of GBM patients. In summary, our study provides preliminary evidence of some causal relationship between ADRB1-targeted BBs and glioblastoma development. However, more studies are needed to validate these findings and further reveal the complex relationship between BP and GBM.