Body Surface Mapping of Ventricular Repolarization Heterogeneity: An Ex-vivo Multiparameter Study

Electric Field-Based Spatial Analysis of Noncontact Unipolar Electrograms to Map Regional Activation-Repolarization Intervals

BACKGROUND

Spatial heterogeneity in repolarization plays an important role in generating and sustaining cardiac arrhythmias. Reliable determination of repolarization times remains challenging.

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to improve processing of densely sampled noncontact unipolar electrograms to yield reliable high-resolution activation and repolarization maps.

METHODS

Endocardial noncontact unipolar electrograms were both simulated and recorded in pig left ventricle. Electrical activity on the endocardial surface was processed in terms of a pseudo-electric field. Activation and repolarization times were calculated by using an amplitude-weighted average on QRS and T waves (ie, the E-field method). This was compared vs the conventional Wyatt method on unipolar electrograms. Timing maps were validated against timing on endocardial action potentials in a simulation study. In vivo, activation and repolarization times determined by using this alternative E-field method were validated against simultaneously recorded endocardial monophasic action potentials (MAPs).

RESULTS

Simulation showed that the E-field method provides viable measurements of local endocardial action potential activation and repolarization times. In vivo, correlation of E-field activation times with MAP activation times (rE = 0.76; P < 0.001) was similar to those of Wyatt (rWyatt = 0.80, P < 0.001; P[h1:rE > rWyatt] = 0.82); for repolarization times, correlation improved significantly (rE = 0.96, P < 0.001; rWyatt = 0.82, P < 0.001; P[h1:rE > rWyatt] < 0.00001). This resulted in improved correlations of activation-repolarization intervals to endocardial action potential duration on MAP (rE = 0.96, P < 0.001; rWyatt = 0.86, P < 0.001; P[h1:rE > rWyatt] < 0.00001). Spatial beat-to-beat variation of repolarization could only be calculated by using the E-field methodology and correlated well with the MAP beat-to-beat variation of repolarization (rE = 0.76; P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The E-field method substantially enhances information from endocardial noncontact electrogram data, allowing for dense maps of activation and repolarization times and derived parameters.

The basic heart anatomy and physiology from the cardiologist's perspective: Toward a better understanding of left ventricular mechanics, systolic, and diastolic function

A comprehensive understanding of the cardiac structure-function relationship is essential for proper clinical cardiac imaging. This review summarizes the basic heart anatomy and physiology from the perspective of a heart imager focused on myocardial mechanics. The main issues analyzed are the left ventricular (LV) architecture, the LV myocardial deformation through the cardiac cycle, the LV diastolic function basic parameters and the basic parameters of the LV deformation used in clinical practice for the LV function assessment.

Myocardial viability testing: all STICHed up, or about to be REVIVED?

Patients with ischaemic left ventricular dysfunction frequently undergo myocardial viability testing. The historical model presumes that those who have extensive areas of dysfunctional-yet-viable myocardium derive particular benefit from revascularization, whilst those without extensive viability do not. These suppositions rely on the theory of hibernation and are based on data of low quality: taking a dogmatic approach may therefore lead to patients being refused appropriate, prognostically important treatment. Recent data from a sub-study of the randomized STICH trial challenges these historical concepts, as the volume of viable myocardium failed to predict the effectiveness of coronary artery bypass grafting. Should the Heart Team now abandon viability testing, or are new paradigms needed in the way we interpret viability? This state-of-the-art review critically examines the evidence base for viability testing, focusing in particular on the presumed interactions between viability, functional recovery, revascularization and prognosis which underly the traditional model. We consider whether viability should relate solely to dysfunctional myocardium or be considered more broadly and explore wider uses of viability testingoutside of revascularization decision-making. Finally, we look forward to ongoing and future randomized trials, which will shape evidence-based clinical practice in the future.

Body Surface Potential Mapping: Contemporary Applications and Future Perspectives

Body surface potential mapping (BSPM) is a noninvasive modality to assess cardiac bioelectric activity with a rich history of practical applications for both research and clinical investigation. BSPM provides comprehensive acquisition of bioelectric signals across the entire thorax, allowing for more complex and extensive analysis than the standard electrocardiogram (ECG). Despite its advantages, BSPM is not a common clinical tool. BSPM does, however, serve as a valuable research tool and as an input for other modes of analysis such as electrocardiographic imaging and, more recently, machine learning and artificial intelligence. In this report, we examine contemporary uses of BSPM, and provide an assessment of its future prospects in both clinical and research environments. We assess the state of the art of BSPM implementations and explore modern applications of advanced modeling and statistical analysis of BSPM data. We predict that BSPM will continue to be a valuable research tool, and will find clinical utility at the intersection of computational modeling approaches and artificial intelligence.