Bio-psycho-social factors' associations with brain age: a large-scale UK Biobank diffusion study of 35,749 participants

Brain age as a biomarker for pathological versus healthy ageing - a REMEMBER study

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the potential clinical value of a new brain age prediction model as a single interpretable variable representing the condition of our brain. Among many clinical use cases, brain age could be a novel outcome measure to assess the preventive effect of life-style interventions.

METHODS

The REMEMBER study population (N = 742) consisted of cognitively healthy (HC,N = 91), subjective cognitive decline (SCD,N = 65), mild cognitive impairment (MCI,N = 319) and AD dementia (ADD,N = 267) subjects. Automated brain volumetry of global, cortical, and subcortical brain structures computed by the CE-labeled and FDA-cleared software icobrain dm (dementia) was retrospectively extracted from T1-weighted MRI sequences that were acquired during clinical routine at participating memory clinics from the Belgian Dementia Council. The volumetric features, along with sex, were combined into a weighted sum using a linear model, and were used to predict 'brain age' and 'brain predicted age difference' (BPAD = brain age-chronological age) for every subject.

RESULTS

MCI and ADD patients showed an increased brain age compared to their chronological age. Overall, brain age outperformed BPAD and chronological age in terms of classification accuracy across the AD spectrum. There was a weak-to-moderate correlation between total MMSE score and both brain age (r = -0.38,p < .001) and BPAD (r = -0.26,p < .001). Noticeable trends, but no significant correlations, were found between BPAD and incidence of conversion from MCI to ADD, nor between BPAD and conversion time from MCI to ADD. BPAD was increased in heavy alcohol drinkers compared to non-/sporadic (p = .014) and moderate (p = .040) drinkers.

CONCLUSIONS

Brain age and associated BPAD have the potential to serve as indicators for, and to evaluate the impact of lifestyle modifications or interventions on, brain health.

Accelerated Brain Aging Mediates the Association Between Psychological Profiles and Clinical Pain in Knee Osteoarthritis

Chronic pain is driven by factors across the biopsychosocial spectrum. Previously, we demonstrated that magnetic resonance images (MRI)-based brain-predicted age differences (brain-PAD: brain-predicted age minus chronological age) were significantly associated with pain severity in individuals with chronic knee pain. We also previously identified four distinct, replicable, multidimensional psychological profiles significantly associated with clinical pain. The brain aging-psychological characteristics interface in persons with chronic pain promises elucidating factors contributing to their poor health outcomes, yet this relationship is barely understood. That is why we examined the interplay between the psychological profiles in participants having chronic knee pain impacting function, brain-PAD, and clinical pain severity. Controlling for demographics and MRI scanner, we compared the brain-PAD among psychological profiles at baseline (n = 164) and over two years (n = 90). We also explored whether profile-related differences in pain severity were mediated by brain-PAD. Brain-PAD differed significantly between profiles (ANOVA's omnibus test, P = .039). Specifically, participants in the profile 3 group (high negative/low positive emotions) had an average brain-PAD ∼4 years higher than those in profile- (low somatic reactivity), with P = .047, Bonferroni-corrected, and than those in profile 2 (high coping), with P = .027, uncorrected. Repeated measures ANOVA revealed no significant change in profile-related brain-PAD differences over time, but there was a significant decrease in brain-PAD for profile 4 (high optimism/high positive affect), with P = .045. Moreover, profile-related differences in pain severity at baseline were partly explained by brain-PAD differences between profile 3 and 1, or 2; but brain-PAD did not significantly mediate the influence of variations in profiles on changes in pain severity over time. PERSPECTIVE: Accelerated brain aging could underlie the psychological-pain relationship, and psychological characteristics may predispose individuals with chronic knee pain to worse health outcomes via neuropsychological processes.

Brain asymmetries from mid- to late life and hemispheric brain age

The human brain demonstrates structural and functional asymmetries which have implications for ageing and mental and neurological disease development. We used a set of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) metrics derived from structural and diffusion MRI data in N=48,040 UK Biobank participants to evaluate age-related differences in brain asymmetry. Most regional grey and white matter metrics presented asymmetry, which were higher later in life. Informed by these results, we conducted hemispheric brain age (HBA) predictions from left/right multimodal MRI metrics. HBA was concordant to conventional brain age predictions, using metrics from both hemispheres, but offers a supplemental general marker of brain asymmetry when setting left/right HBA into relationship with each other. In contrast to WM brain asymmetries, left/right discrepancies in HBA are lower at higher ages. Our findings outline various sex-specific differences, particularly important for brain age estimates, and the value of further investigating the role of brain asymmetries in brain ageing and disease development.

Considerations on brain age predictions from repeatedly sampled data across time

INTRODUCTION

Brain age, the estimation of a person's age from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters, has been used as a general indicator of health. The marker requires however further validation for application in clinical contexts. Here, we show how brain age predictions perform for the same individual at various time points and validate our findings with age-matched healthy controls.

METHODS

We used densely sampled T1-weighted MRI data from four individuals (from two densely sampled datasets) to observe how brain age corresponds to age and is influenced by acquisition and quality parameters. For validation, we used two cross-sectional datasets. Brain age was predicted by a pretrained deep learning model.

RESULTS

We found small within-subject correlations between age and brain age. We also found evidence for the influence of field strength on brain age which replicated in the cross-sectional validation data and inconclusive effects of scan quality.

CONCLUSION

The absence of maturation effects for the age range in the presented sample, brain age model bias (including training age distribution and field strength), and model error are potential reasons for small relationships between age and brain age in densely sampled longitudinal data. Clinical applications of brain age models should consider of the possibility of apparent biases caused by variation in the data acquisition process.

Comparison of different neurite density metrics with brain asymmetry evaluation

The standard diffusion MRI model with intra- and extra-axonal water pools offers a set of microstructural parameters describing brain white matter architecture. However, non-linearities in the standard model and diffusion data contamination by noise and imaging artefacts make estimation of diffusion metrics challenging. In order to develop reliable diffusion approaches and to avoid computational model degeneracy, additional theoretical assumptions allowing stable numerical implementations are required. Advanced diffusion approaches allow for estimation of intra-axonal water fraction (AWF), describing a key structural characteristic of brain tissue. AWF can be interpreted as an indirect measure or proxy of neurite density and has a potential as useful clinical biomarker. Established diffusion approaches such as white matter tract integrity, neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI), and spherical mean technique provide estimates of AWF within their respective theoretical frameworks. In the present study, we estimated AWF metrics using different diffusion approaches and compared measures of brain asymmetry between the different metrics in a sub-sample of 182 subjects from the UK Biobank. Multivariate decomposition by mean of linked independent component analysis revealed that the various AWF proxies derived from the different diffusion approaches reflect partly non-overlapping variance of independent components, with distinct anatomical distributions and sensitivity to age. Further, voxel-wise analysis revealed age-related differences in AWF-based brain asymmetry, indicating less apparent left-right hemisphere difference with higher age. Finally, we demonstrated that NODDI metrics suffer from a quite strong dependence on used numerical algorithms and post-processing pipeline. The analysis based on AWF metrics strongly depends on the used diffusion approach and leads to poorly reproducible results.