Neuroimaging Studies of Antidepressant Placebo Effects: Challenges and Opportunities

Placebo stimulates neuroplasticity in depression: implications for clinical practice and research

Neither psychological nor neuroscientific investigations have been able to fully explain the paradox that placebo is designed to be inert in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), yet appears to be effective in evaluations of clinical interventions in all fields of medicine and alternative medicine. This article develops the Neuroplasticity Placebo Theory, which posits that neuroplasticity in fronto-limbic areas is the unifying factor in placebo response (seen in RCTs) and placebo effect (seen in clinical interventions) where it is not intended to be inert. Depression is the disorder that has the highest placebo response of any medical condition and has the greatest potential for understanding how placebos work: recent developments in understanding of the pathophysiology of depression suggest that fronto-limbic areas are sensitized in depression which is associated with a particularly strong placebo phenomenon. An innovative linkage is made between diverse areas of the psychology and the translational psychiatry literature to provide supportive evidence for the Neuroplasticity Placebo Theory. This is underpinned by neuro-radiological evidence of fronto-limbic change in the placebo arm of antidepressant trials. If placebo stimulates neuroplasticity in fronto-limbic areas in conditions other than depression - and results in a partially active treatment in other areas of medicine - there are far reaching consequences for the day-to-day use of placebo in clinical practice, the future design of RCTs in all clinical conditions, and existing unwarranted assertions about the efficacy of antidepressant medications. If fronto-limbic neuroplasticity is the common denominator in designating placebo as a partially active treatment, the terms placebo effect and placebo response should be replaced by the single term "placebo treatment."

Neural connectivity moderators and mechanisms of ketamine treatment among treatment-resistant depressed patients: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Intravenous (IV) ketamine has emerged as a rapid and effective treatment for TRD. However, the specific neural mechanisms of ketamine's effects in humans remains unclear. Although neuroplasticity is implicated as a mechanism of action in animal models, relatively few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in TRD patients have examined ketamine's impact on functional connectivity, a posited functional marker of neuroplasticity-particularly in the context of a mood-induction paradigm (termed miFC).

METHODS

152 adults with TRD (63% female; 37% male) were randomly allocated to receive a single infusion of ketamine or saline in a 2:1 ratio. We examined changes in connectivity (from baseline to 24-h post-infusion) that differed by treatment, and whether clinical treatment response at 24-h post-infusion was uniquely related (among patients allocated to ketamine relative to saline) to (1) pre-treatment connectivity and (2) changes in connectivity. We examined both miFC and rsFC, using prefrontal cortex and limbic seed regions. We also conducted a multiverse analysis to examine findings most robust against analytic decisions.

FINDINGS

Across both miFC and rsFC, ketamine was associated with greater in prefrontal/limbic connectivity compared to saline, and lower baseline connectivity of limbic and prefrontal regions predicted greater treatment response in patients receiving ketamine. Greater connectivity increases in participants receiving ketamine was uniquely related to greater treatment response. In addition, certain findings were identified as being reproducible against different analytic decisions in multiverse analyses.

INTERPRETATION

Our findings identify specific neural connectivity patterns impacted by ketamine and were uniquely related to outcomes following ketamine (relative to saline). These findings generally support prominent neuroplasticity models of ketamine's therapeutic efficacy. These findings lay new groundwork for understanding how to enhance and optimize ketamine treatments and develop novel rapid-acting treatments for depression.

FUNDING

This research was supported by NIH grant R01MH113857 and by the Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute at the University of Pittsburgh (UL1-TR-001857).

Circadian rhythm biomarker from wearable device data is related to concurrent antidepressant treatment response

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is associated with circadian rhythm disruption. Yet, no circadian rhythm biomarkers have been clinically validated for assessing antidepressant response. In this study, 40 participants with MDD provided actigraphy data using wearable devices for one week after initiating antidepressant treatment in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Their depression severity was calculated pretreatment, after one week and eight weeks of treatment. This study assesses the relationship between parametric and nonparametric measures of circadian rhythm and change in depression. Results show significant association between a lower circadian quotient (reflecting less robust rhythmicity) and improvement in depression from baseline following first week of treatment (estimate = 0.11, F = 7.01, P = 0.01). There is insufficient evidence of an association between circadian rhythm measures acquired during the first week of treatment and outcomes after eight weeks of treatment. Despite this lack of association with future treatment outcome, this scalable, cost-effective biomarker may be useful for timely mental health care through remote monitoring of real-time changes in current depression.

μ Opioid Antagonist Naltrexone Partially Abolishes the Antidepressant Placebo Effect and Reduces Orbitofrontal Cortex Encoding of Reinforcement

BACKGROUND

Like placebo analgesia, the antidepressant placebo effect appears to involve cortical and subcortical endogenous opioid signaling, yet the mechanism through which opioid release affects mood remains unclear. The orbitofrontal cortex (OFC)-which integrates various attributes of a stimulus to predict associated outcomes-has been implicated in placebo effects and is rich in μ opioid receptors. We hypothesized that naltrexone blockade of μ opioid receptors would blunt OFC-dependent antidepressant placebo effects.

METHODS

Twenty psychotropic-free patients with major depressive disorder completed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study of 1 oral dose of 50 mg of naltrexone or matching placebo immediately before completing 2 sessions of the antidepressant placebo functional magnetic resonance imaging task. This task manipulates placebo-associated expectancies and their reinforcement while assessing expected and actual mood improvement.

RESULTS

Behaviorally, manipulations of antidepressant placebo expectancies and their reinforcement had positive, interactive effects on participants' expectancy and mood ratings. The high-expectancy condition recruited the dorsolateral and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, as well as dorsal attention stream regions. Interestingly, increased dorsolateral and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex brain responses appeared to attenuate the antidepressant placebo effect. The administration of 1 oral dose of naltrexone, compared with placebo, partially abolished the interaction of the expectancy and reinforcement manipulation on mood and blocked reinforcement-induced responses in the right central OFC.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show preliminary evidence for the role of μ opioid central OFC modulation in antidepressant placebo effects by positively biasing the value of placebo based on reinforcement and enhancing subsequent hedonic experiences.

Comorbid Chronic Pain and Depression: Shared Risk Factors and Differential Antidepressant Effectiveness

The bidirectional relationship between depression and chronic pain is well-recognized, but their clinical management remains challenging. Here we characterize the shared risk factors and outcomes for their comorbidity in the Australian Genetics of Depression cohort study (N = 13,839). Participants completed online questionnaires about chronic pain, psychiatric symptoms, comorbidities, treatment response and general health. Logistic regression models were used to examine the relationship between chronic pain and clinical and demographic factors. Cumulative linked logistic regressions assessed the effect of chronic pain on treatment response for 10 different antidepressants. Chronic pain was associated with an increased risk of depression (OR = 1.86 [1.37-2.54]), recent suicide attempt (OR = 1.88 [1.14-3.09]), higher use of tobacco (OR = 1.05 [1.02-1.09]) and misuse of painkillers (e.g., opioids; OR = 1.31 [1.06-1.62]). Participants with comorbid chronic pain and depression reported fewer functional benefits from antidepressant use and lower benefits from sertraline (OR = 0.75 [0.68-0.83]), escitalopram (OR = 0.75 [0.67-0.85]) and venlafaxine (OR = 0.78 [0.68-0.88]) when compared to participants without chronic pain. Furthermore, participants taking sertraline (OR = 0.45 [0.30-0.67]), escitalopram (OR = 0.45 [0.27-0.74]) and citalopram (OR = 0.32 [0.15-0.67]) specifically for chronic pain (among other indications) reported lower benefits compared to other participants taking these same medications but not for chronic pain. These findings reveal novel insights into the complex relationship between chronic pain and depression. Treatment response analyses indicate differential effectiveness between particular antidepressants and poorer functional outcomes for these comorbid conditions. Further examination is warranted in targeted interventional clinical trials, which also include neuroimaging genetics and pharmacogenomics protocols. This work will advance the delineation of disease risk indicators and novel aetiological pathways for therapeutic intervention in comorbid pain and depression as well as other psychiatric comorbidities.

Accelerated brain aging predicts impulsivity and symptom severity in depression

Multiple structural and functional neuroimaging measures vary over the course of the lifespan and can be used to predict chronological age. Accelerated brain aging, as quantified by deviations in the MRI-based predicted age with respect to chronological age, is associated with risk for neurodegenerative conditions, bipolar disorder, and mortality. Whether age-related changes in resting-state functional connectivity are accelerated in major depressive disorder (MDD) is unknown, and, if so, it is unclear if these changes contribute to specific cognitive weaknesses that often occur in MDD. Here, we delineated age-related functional connectivity changes in a large sample of normal control subjects and tested whether brain aging is accelerated in MDD. Furthermore, we tested whether accelerated brain aging predicts individual differences in cognitive function. We trained a support vector regression model predicting age using resting-state functional connectivity in 710 healthy adults aged 18-89. We applied this model trained on normal aging subjects to a sample of actively depressed MDD participants (n = 109). The difference between predicted brain age and chronological age was 2.11 years greater (p = 0.015) in MDD patients compared to control participants. An older MDD brain age was significantly associated with increased impulsivity and, in males, increased depressive severity. Unexpectedly, accelerated brain aging was also associated with increased placebo response in a sham-controlled trial of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation targeting the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex. Our results indicate that MDD is associated with accelerated brain aging, and that accelerated aging is selectively associated with greater impulsivity and depression severity.

Understanding the Neurocomputational Mechanisms of Antidepressant Placebo Effects

Over the last two decades, neuroscientists have used antidepressant placebo probes to examine the biological mechanisms implicated in antidepressant placebo effects. However, findings from these studies have not yet elucidated a model-based theory that would explain the mechanism through which antidepressant expectancies evolve to induce persistent mood changes. Emerging evidence suggests that antidepressant placebo effects may be informed by models of reinforcement learning (RL). Such that an individual's expectation of improvement is updated with the arrival of new sensory evidence, by incorporating a reward prediction error (RPE), which signals the mismatch between the expected (expected value) and perceived improvement. Consistent with this framework, neuroimaging studies of antidepressant placebo effects have demonstrated placebo-induced μ-opioid activation and increased blood-oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) responses in regions tracking expected values (e.g., ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC)) and RPEs (e.g., ventral striatum (VS)). In this study, we will demonstrate the causal contribution of reward learning signals (expected values and RPEs) to antidepressant placebo effects by experimentally manipulating expected values using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) targeting the vmPFC and μ-opioid striatal RPE signal using pharmacological approaches. We hypothesized that antidepressant placebo expectancies are represented in the vmPFC (expected value) and updated by means of μ-opioid-modulated striatal learning signal. In a 3 × 3 factorial double-blind design, we will randomize 120 antidepressant-free individuals with depressive symptoms to one of three between-subject opioid conditions: the μ-opioid agonist buprenorphine, the μ-opioid antagonist naltrexone, or an inert pill. Within each arm, individuals will be assigned to receive three within-subject counterbalanced forms of TMS targeting the vmPFC-intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation (TBS) expected to potentiate the vmPFC, continuous TBS expected to de-potentiate the vmPFC, or sham TBS. These experimental manipulations will be used to modulate trial-by-trial reward learning signals and related brain activity during the Antidepressant Placebo functional MRI (fMRI) Task to address the following aims: (1) investigate the relationship between reward learning signals within the vmPFC-VS circuit and antidepressant placebo effects; (2) examine the causal contribution of vmPFC expected value computations to antidepressant placebo effects; and (3) investigate the causal contribution of μ-opioid-modulated striatal RPEs to antidepressant placebo effects. The proposed study will be the first to investigate the causal contribution of μ-opioid-modulated vmPFC-VS learning signals to antidepressant placebo responses, paving the way for developing novel treatments modulating learning processes and objective means of quantifying and potentially reducing placebo effects during drug development.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04276259.

Greater Dynamic and Lower Static Functional Brain Connectivity Prospectively Predict Placebo Response in Pediatric Generalized Anxiety Disorder

Objectives: Placebo response is one of the most significant barriers to detecting treatment effects in pediatric (and adult) clinical trials focusing on affective and anxiety disorders. We sought to identify neurofunctional predictors of placebo response in adolescents with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) by examining dynamic and static functional brain connectivity. Methods: Before randomization to blinded placebo, adolescents, aged 12-17 years, with GAD (N = 25) underwent resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging. Whole brain voxelwise correlation analyses were used to determine the relationship between change in anxiety symptoms from baseline to week 8 and seed-based dynamic and static functional connectivity maps of regions in the salience and ventral attention networks (amygdala, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex [dACC], and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex [VLPFC]). Results: Greater dynamic functional connectivity variability in amygdala, dACC, VLPFC, and regions within salience, default mode, and frontoparietal networks was associated with greater placebo response. Lower static functional connectivity between amygdala and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, amygdala and medial prefrontal cortex, dACC and posterior cingulate cortex and greater static functional connectivity between VLPFC and inferior parietal lobule were associated with greater placebo response. Conclusion: Placebo response is associated with a distinct dynamic and static connectivity fingerprint characterized by "variable" dynamic but "weak" static connectivity in the salience, default mode, frontoparietal, and ventral attention networks. These data provide granular evidence of how circuit-based biotypes mechanistically relate to placebo response. Finding biosignatures that predict placebo response is critically important in clinical psychopharmacology and to improve our ability to detect medication-placebo differences in clinical trials.