The Prevalence and Factors Associated With Antipsychotic Polypharmacy in a Forensic Psychiatric Sample

Liraglutide 3.0 mg once daily for the treatment of overweight and obesity in patients hospitalised at a forensic psychiatric department: A 26-week open-label feasibility study

INTRODUCTION

Overweight and obesity constitute a major concern among patients treated at forensic psychiatric departments. The present clinical feasibility study aimed at investigating the extent to which glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) treatment with once-daily liraglutide 3.0 mg could be a feasible pharmacological treatment of these conditions in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders hospitalised in forensic psychiatry.

METHODS

The 26-week, open-label feasibility study included participants aged 18-65 years diagnosed with a severe mental illness and hospitalised at a forensic psychiatric department. At the time of inclusion, all participants fulfilled the indication for using liraglutide as a treatment for overweight and obesity. Participants' baseline examinations were followed by a 26-week treatment period with liraglutide injection once daily according to a fixed uptitration schedule of liraglutide, with a target dose of 3.0 mg. Each participant attended seven visits to evaluate the efficacy and adverse events. The primary endpoint was the number of "completers", with adherence defined as >80% injections obtained in the period, weeks 12-26. Determining whether liraglutide is a feasible treatment was pre-defined to a minimum of 75% completers.

RESULTS

Twenty-four participants were included in the study. Sex, male = 19 (79.2%). Mean age: 42.3 [25th and 75th percentiles: 39.1; 48.4] years; body mass index (BMI): 35.7 [31.7; 37.5] kg/m2; glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c): 37 [35; 39] mmol/mol. Eleven out of 24 participants (46%) completed the study. For the completers, the median net body weight loss after 26 weeks of participation was -11.4 kg [-15.4; -5.9]. The net difference in HbA1C and BMI was -2.0 mmol/mol [-4; -1] and -3.6 kg/m2 [-4.7; -1.8], respectively. The weight change and reduction in HbA1c and BMI were all statistically significant from baseline.

CONCLUSION

The study did not confirm our hypothesis that liraglutide is a feasible treatment for a minimum of 75% of the patients initiating treatment with liraglutide while hospitalised in a forensic psychiatric department. The high dropout rate may be due to the non-naturalistic setting of the clinical trial. For the proportion of patients compliant with the medication, liraglutide 3.0 mg was an efficient treatment for overweight.

Polypharmacy in antipsychotic pharmacological treatment among patients with dual diagnosis in Denmark

INTRODUCTION

Antipsychotic polypharmacy is prevalent, however literature on antipsychotic polypharmacy during treatment among patients with dual diagnosis is largely non-existent. This study aims to investigating the extent of antipsychotic polypharmacy dual diagnosis patients during hospitalisations.

METHODS

Utilizing cohort data from an integrated dual diagnosis in-patient facility from patients hospitalized between 1 March 2012, to 31 December 2016, we compared the mean antipsychotic medication administered at admission and discharge and examined covariate associations with logistic regressions.

RESULTS

The study identified 907 hospital admissions, of which 641 were the first for each patient during the period. At admission, 74.1% received antipsychotics; polypharmacy spanned psychiatric disorders. categories. Patients with affective or personality spectrum disorders were less likely to have antipsychotic polypharmacy upon admission compared to those with psychosis spectrum disorders. 2013-2016 admissions presented less polypharmacy than 2012. Mean antipsychotic numbers remained unchanged for >30-day hospitalizations. Patients admitted without antipsychotic polypharmacy with an affective spectrum disorder or aged 41-50 or over 51 years old were less likely to be discharged with antipsychotic polypharmacy when compared to patients with psychosis spectrum disorder or aged 18-30 years old.

CONCLUSION

Approximately three-quarters of admitted patients were treated with antipsychotic medication. Antipsychotic polypharmacy was observed across all psychiatric disorder categories, indicating potential off-label use. Addressing antipsychotic polypharmacy during treatment is challenging, even for specialised facilities. Rational antipsychotic prescribing, deprescribing protocols, and further prescription pattern research are needed.

Schizophrenia patients discharged on antipsychotic polypharmacy from a public psychiatric hospital in Taiwan, 2006-2021

The aim of this study was to identify the factors associated with antipsychotic polypharmacy (APP), investigate whether APP could affect the risk of rehospitalization, and explore temporal trends in APP use. Schizophrenia patients discharged from the study hospital between 2006 and 2021 (n = 16,722) were included in the analysis. The logistic regression model was employed to determine the predictors significantly associated with APP use. Survival analysis was used to compare time to rehospitalization between APP and antipsychotic monotherapy (AMT). The temporal trend of APP use was analyzed using the Cochran-Armitage Trend test. In comparison with the patients (n = 10,909) who were discharged on AMT, those (n = 5,813) on APP were significantly more likely to be male gender, to receive LAIs, to take clozapine, to take anticholinergic agents, to have a greater number of previous hospitalizations, and to have a higher CPZ equivalent dose of antipsychotic prescription. The prescription rate of APP significantly increased from 18.4 % in 2006 to 44.9 % in 2021. Compared with AMT, APP was associated with more clozapine use, more LAI use, higher doses of antipsychotics, and an increased risk of rehospitalization. In addition, the prescription of APP continued to increase during the study period.

Nationwide study on antipsychotic polypharmacy among forensic psychiatric patients

This nationwide retrospective cross-sectional study examines the prevalence of antipsychotic polypharmacy (APP) and demographic, forensic, and clinical factors associated with its practice among Greenlandic forensic psychiatric patients. We collected data from electronic patient files, court documents, and forensic psychiatric assessments. We defined APP as two or more concurrent prescriptions of antipsychotic medication. The study population of 74 patients had a mean age of 41.4 years, and 61 were men. All included patients had either schizophrenia or another ICD-10 F2-diagnosis. We used unpaired t-tests and Chi² or Fisher's exact test. The prevalence of APP was 35% (n = 26), and there was a significant association between APP and a prescription of clozapine (Chi², p = 0.010), olanzapine (Fisher's test, p = 0.003), and aripiprazole (Fisher's test, p = 0.013). Furthermore, we found a significant association between APP and prescription of a first-generation antipsychotic (FGA) (Chi², p = 0.011). Despite recommendations in guidelines, the use of APP is common practice. The majority of forensic psychiatric patients suffer from severe psychiatric disorders, often with other comorbidities, including substance use disorder. The severity and complexity in mental health render forensic psychiatric patients at high risk of APP treatment. Further knowledge on APP use is crucial to secure and further improve the psychopharmacological treatment for this group of patients.

Readmission Rates of Patients Discharged on Antipsychotic Polypharmacy Compared to Antipsychotic Monotherapy

Antipsychotic medications are used to treat many psychiatric conditions and are paramount for relapse prevention in patients with mental illnesses. Antipsychotic monotherapy (APM) is a commonly recommended approach, however there is no clear consensus on the use of antipsychotic polypharmacy (APP). A single-center retrospective review was conducted comparing readmission rates of behavioral health patients discharged on APP or APM between August 1st 2019 and July 31st 2021. The primary outcome was the one-year psychiatric readmission rate. Secondary outcomes included further readmission time frame stratification, olanzapine equivalent doses, and use of anticholinergic medications. The total readmission rate was 24.5% (24/98) in the APP group compared to 19.1% (107/560) in the APM group (p = 0.22). Patients discharged on APM were not found to have a statistically significant increase in readmission rate compared to patients discharged on APP. Further research is needed to assess the risks and benefits of APP.

PRN usage before and after discharge from a forensic inpatient unit: A series example of patients with intellectual disabilities

Adults living with intellectual and developmental disabilities are often prescribed psychotropic medication on an "as needed" basis (PRN) in response to behavioural challenges. In the present study we conducted a retrospective analysis of medication administration records in the 6-months preceding and following discharge of 11 adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities to community settings from forensic inpatient units within a mental health hospital. We found a significant reduction in the frequency of PRN usage after discharge. We propose potential reasons for the difference in PRN administration across settings and make suggestions for future research.

Prevalence and Factors Affecting the Use of Antipsychotics and Antipsychotic Polypharmacy in a Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Inpatient Service

Objective: We aimed to examine the antipsychotics used by patients hospitalized in the child and youth inpatient service providing tertiary care to investigate whether there is a difference between admission and discharge, polypharmacy, which antipsychotics are used, and which psychotropics are used concomitant with antipsychotics. Methods: Research data were collected retrospectively from all children and adolescents hospitalized in a child and adolescent psychiatry inpatient service in a university hospital in a 4-year period (2015-2019). The sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of the patients, the antipsychotics they used at admission and discharge, the other psychotropics concomitantly used with antipsychotics, and the side effects associated with antipsychotics during hospitalization were collected from the files of the 363 patients. Results: Patients on antipsychotics increased 12.1% from hospitalization to discharge. Antipsychotic polypharmacy increased from 16.2% at admission to 30.7% at discharge. Logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate the factors affecting antipsychotic and antipsychotic polypharmacy. Self-harm, aggression/violence, and extended hospitalization were factors associated with increased antipsychotic use. Psychotic symptoms, psychotic disorder, and extended hospitalization were factors associated with an increase in antipsychotic polypharmacy. Conclusions: Understanding the factors that may cause antipsychotic use and polypharmacy in inpatient services in children and adolescents may prevent unnecessary drug use and long-term side effects that may occur due to these drugs.

High Risk, High Dose?-Pharmacotherapeutic Prescription Patterns of Offender and Non-Offender Patients with Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder

Compared to acute or community settings, forensic psychiatric settings, in general, have been reported to make greater use of antipsychotic polypharmacy and/or high dose pharmacotherapy, including overdosing. However, there is a scarcity of research specifically on offender patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD), although they make up a large proportion of forensic psychiatric patients. Our study, therefore, aimed at evaluating prescription patterns in offender patients compared to non-offender patients with SSD. After initial statistical analysis with null-hypothesis significance testing, we evaluated the interplay of the significant variables and ranked them in accordance with their predictive power through application of supervised machine learning algorithms. While offender patients received higher doses of antipsychotics, non-offender patients were more likely to receive polypharmacologic treatment as well as additional antidepressants and benzodiazepines. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate a homogenous group of offender patients with SSD in comparison to non-offender controls regarding patterns of antipsychotic and other psychopharmacologic prescription patterns.

Maintenance Therapy of Psychosis Spectrum Disorders in a Real-World Setting: Antipsychotics Prescription Patterns and Long-Term Benzodiazepine Use

BACKGROUND

Maintenance therapy of patients with primary psychosis spectrum disorders (PSD) in the Western Balkans has received limited interest so far. The present study aimed to investigate long-term prescription patterns among outpatients with PSD.

METHODS

Information about prescription of antipsychotics (AP), benzodiazepines (BZD) and other psychotropic medication over a 6-month period was collected from outpatients (n = 134; ICD-10 diagnosis F20-29) recruited by a larger multi-site study, to find mean daily number of psychotropic drugs, AP prescription patterns (including AP daily dose, route of administration, monotherapy vs. polypharmacy) and BZD utilization (long-term add-on BZD therapy). Additionally, sex-differences in the variables were explored.

RESULTS

Clinically stable outpatients (age 41.7 ± 11.0; male 62.7%; duration of untreated illness 12.7 ± 8.7 years; mean number of lifetime hospitalizations 2.6 ± 0.7) were prescribed 2.8 ± 1.1 psychotropic medications daily. The mean 6-month AP dose was 14.2 ± 7.8 mg olanzapine equivalents. Long-acting injectable AP was prescribed to 25.2% of the patients. Long-term AP monotherapy was found in 52.7% patients and most of them were prescribed second generation AP (65.2%). Long-term AP polypharmacy (42.7%) was more common in males (p = 0.015). The most frequent co-prescription patterns were first generation AP plus clozapine. The highest rate of long-term AP co-prescription was found for BZD (in 42.7% cases, average 6-months daily dose of 2.8 ± 2.7 mg lorazepam equivalents) and anticholinergics (33.6%).

CONCLUSION

Existing appropriately designed interventions aiming to safely switch the inappropriate therapeutic regimens, i.e. very high prevalence of long-term AP polypharmacy and non-rational BZD co-prescription, should be implemented in the region of Western Balkans.

[Psychotropic Drugs - Comparison of Application Practice in Forensic and General Psychiatry]

The psychopharmacological application practice in forensic and general psychiatry should be investigated comparatively.The 2014-2019 Pharmaco-Epidemiology and Vigilance (Pharmako-EpiVig) surveys of the Bavarian Institute for Data, Analysis and Quality Assurance (BIDAQ) from forensic psychiatry (n = 4,590) and general psychiatry (n = 5,136) of the Isar-Amper-Klinikum Munich East were evaluated.Mean age and diagnosis distribution of the patient clientele differed, as did substance selection and dosage, which was almost consistently higher in forensic psychiatry. In schizophrenic forensic patients, clozapine was given most frequently. In both specialties, the frequent use of valproate was striking.The results could be interpreted as an indication that forensic patients have more severe and refractory illnesses, and that in clinical practice overall a symptom-related anti-aggressive treatment seems to be significant.

Health behaviours of forensic mental health service users, in relation to smoking, alcohol consumption, dietary behaviours and physical activity-A mixed methods systematic review

WHAT IS KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT

People with mental disorders have increased risk of dying from diabetes and cardiovascular diseases compared to the general population. Diabetes and cardiovascular diseases are preventable by improved lifestyle regarding smoking, alcohol consumption, physical activity and dietary behaviours. Forensic mental health service users are treated for longer periods of time compared to non-forensic mental health service users, giving the opportunity to affect the lifestyle for a substantial period of time.

WHAT THE PAPER ADDS TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE

This review gathers existing research on forensic mental health service users' lifestyle regarding smoking, alcohol consumption, physical activity, and dietary behaviours and factors influencing it. The lifestyle was found to be unfavourable with many patients being smokers, having problematic alcohol consumption, being physically inactive and eating a diet of poor nutritional value and rich in calories. Therefore, it seems likely that an unfavourable lifestyle is one reason for the excess mortality from diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. Smoking cessation and improving dietary habits was perceived difficult, but nicotine replacement and practical advice was suggested to support a change.

WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The treatment period gives an opportunity to improve the lifestyle of forensic mental health service users to prevent diabetes and cardiovascular diseases in this high-risk group. We recommend a holistic approach, when planning the prevention activities, since activities that are perceived fun are more likely to succeed.

ABSTRACT

Introduction People with mental disorders have increased risk of dying from diabetes and cardiovascular diseases, both of which can be prevented by lifestyle. Aim To review existing research, in order to investigate the characteristics of, and factors that influence forensic mental health service users' (FMU) health behaviours. Method We searched PubMed, CINAHL, PsycInfo and Scopus for primary research on FMU's health behaviours regarding smoking, alcohol consumption, physical activity and dietary behaviours, and factors that influence them. Results We found 13 eligible studies. The findings consistently indicated the presence of unfavourable health behaviours in FMU: Smoking, problematic alcohol consumption, physical inactivity and a high-calorie diet of poor nutritional value. Changing smoking and dietary habits was perceived as difficult, but nicotine replacement and practical advice were suggested to support change. Discussion The existing research on FMU's health behaviours is sparse. In particular, there is a lack of research on factors that influence health behaviours. From our findings, it seems likely that FMU's unfavourable health behaviours contribute to their increased risk of dying from diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. Implications for practice FMU's health behaviours should be improved to prevent diabetes and cardiovascular diseases in this high-risk group.

Drug compliance and the Morisky Adherence Scale: An expression of concern and a warning

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Every prescriber knows that patients often do not take their medicines as prescribed. Hippocrates, the wise man of Kos, knew over two millennia ago. Our objective is to comment on the types of studies aimed at understanding and optimizing drug usage and to draw attention to the need to seek approval before using or citing the Morisky adherence scale.

COMMENT

The study of prescribing and how patients use their medicines is important. As part of this effort, the results of investigations of how patients adhere to drug prescriptions can be informative. However, the results are meaningful only if the methods used for doing the measurements are valid and made explicit. We were surprised when a team of our authors were threatened with legal action for citing the Morisky Adherence Scale and explaining how some authors had obtained their adherence scores. Adherence studies are but one facet of the study of prescribing aimed at improving clinical outcomes. Other aspects include investigating the quality of prescribing, and how unnecessary medicines can be deprescribed to improve the quality of care and reduce the risk of adverse effects.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

The study of optimal prescribing is an important endeavour and adherence studies are but one aspect. We report that using and citing the Morisky Adherence scale in any detail is a risky business. Prior approval is required unless one is prepared to pay up, retrospectively. We require all authors to certify they have no conflicts of interest with respect to the scale.