1
|
McAlpine RG, Sacchet MD, Simonsson O, Khan M, Krajnovic K, Morometescu L, Kamboj SK. Development of a digital intervention for psychedelic preparation (DIPP). Sci Rep 2024; 14:4072. [PMID: 38374177 PMCID: PMC10876638 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-54642-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Accepted: 02/14/2024] [Indexed: 02/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Psychedelic substances induce profound alterations in consciousness. Careful preparation is therefore essential to limit adverse reactions, enhance therapeutic benefits, and maintain user safety. This paper describes the development of a self-directed, digital intervention for psychedelic preparation. Drawing on elements from the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) framework for developing complex interventions, the design was informed by a four-factor model of psychedelic preparedness, using a person-centred approach. Our mixed-methods investigation consisted of two studies. The first involved interviews with 19 participants who had previously attended a 'high-dose' psilocybin retreat, systematically exploring their preparation behaviours and perspectives on the proposed intervention. The second study engaged 28 attendees of an ongoing psilocybin retreat in co-design workshops, refining the intervention protocol using insights from the initial interviews. The outcome is a co-produced 21-day digital course (Digital Intervention for Psychedelic Preparation (DIPP)), that is organised into four modules: Knowledge-Expectation, Psychophysical-Readiness, Safety-Planning, and Intention-Preparation. Fundamental components of the course include daily meditation practice, supplementary exercises tied to the weekly modules, and mood tracking. DIPP provides a comprehensive and scalable solution to enhance psychedelic preparedness, aligning with the broader shift towards digital mental health interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosalind G McAlpine
- Clinical Psychopharmacology Unit, Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
| | - Matthew D Sacchet
- Meditation Research Program, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Otto Simonsson
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden
| | - Maisha Khan
- Clinical Psychopharmacology Unit, Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Katarina Krajnovic
- Clinical Psychopharmacology Unit, Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Larisa Morometescu
- Clinical Psychopharmacology Unit, Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Sunjeev K Kamboj
- Clinical Psychopharmacology Unit, Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
McAlpine RG, Blackburne G, Kamboj SK. Development and psychometric validation of a novel scale for measuring 'psychedelic preparedness'. Sci Rep 2024; 14:3280. [PMID: 38332334 PMCID: PMC10853197 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-53829-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Preparing participants for psychedelic experiences is crucial for ensuring these experiences are safe and, potentially beneficial. However, there is currently no validated measure to assess the extent to which participants are well-prepared for such experiences. Our study aimed to address this gap by developing, validating, and testing the Psychedelic Preparedness Scale (PPS). Using a novel iterative Delphi-focus group methodology ('DelFo'), followed by qualitative pre-test interviews, we incorporated the perspectives of expert clinicians/researchers and of psychedelic users to generate items for the scale. Psychometric validation of the PPS was carried out in two large online samples of psychedelic users (N = 516; N = 716), and the scale was also administered to a group of participants before and after a 5-7-day psilocybin retreat (N = 46). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis identified four factors from the 20-item PPS: Knowledge-Expectations, Intention-Preparation, Psychophysical-Readiness, and Support-Planning. The PPS demonstrated excellent reliability (ω = 0.954) and evidence supporting convergent, divergent and discriminant validity was also obtained. Significant differences between those scoring high and low (on psychedelic preparedness) before the psychedelic experience were found on measures of mental health/wellbeing outcomes assessed after the experience, suggesting that the scale has predictive utility. By prospectively measuring modifiable pre-treatment preparatory behaviours and attitudes using the PPS, it may be possible to determine whether a participant has generated the appropriate mental 'set' and is therefore likely to benefit from a psychedelic experience, or at least, less likely to be harmed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosalind G McAlpine
- Clinical Psychopharmacology Unit, Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
| | - George Blackburne
- Clinical Psychopharmacology Unit, Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK
- Experimental Psychology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Sunjeev K Kamboj
- Clinical Psychopharmacology Unit, Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Downey AE, Boyd M, Chaphekar AV, Woolley J, Raymond-Flesch M. "But the reality is it's happening": A qualitative study of eating disorder providers about psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy. Int J Eat Disord 2023; 56:2142-2148. [PMID: 37551650 DOI: 10.1002/eat.24041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Revised: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study invited providers who care for patients with eating disorders to inform engagement, communication, and collaboration with psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy interventions. METHOD Medical and mental health providers who treat patients with eating disorders were recruited via professional referral networks and participant driven sampling from across California to participate in one of five focus groups. Discussion topics included prior knowledge of psychedelic therapy, interest/concerns related to psilocybin therapy, and opportunities for collaboration. Study team members completed iterative rounds of coding with a grounded theory approach. RESULTS A total of 32 participants reported a range of familiarity with psychedelics. Some raised concerns about the risks of administering psilocybin to malnourished patients and to those with psychological comorbidities. Despite these concerns, participants were hopeful to see psilocybin therapy as a treatment for patients with eating disorders. In anticipating challenges, providers had concerns about equity in access to care among publicly insured and non-English speaking patients. They requested opportunities for continuing education about psilocybin therapy. DISCUSSION Our findings demonstrate provider interest in psilocybin therapy for the treatment of patients with eating disorders. As psilocybin therapy interventions are developed, providers caring for patients with eating disorders value collaboration to improve longitudinal patient outcomes. PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE This study invited healthcare providers of patients with eating disorders to discuss their thoughts around the use of psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy in this population. Findings will help inform emerging psilocybin therapy clinical trials with the goal of successful translation and adoption in real world clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda E Downey
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Maxine Boyd
- Department of Psychological Science, Loyola Marymount University, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Anita V Chaphekar
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Joshua Woolley
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
- San Francisco Veteran's Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Marissa Raymond-Flesch
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
- Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Teodorowski P, Gleason K, Gregory JJ, Martin M, Punjabi R, Steer S, Savasir S, Vema P, Murray K, Ward H, Chapko D. Participatory evaluation of the process of co-producing resources for the public on data science and artificial intelligence. RESEARCH INVOLVEMENT AND ENGAGEMENT 2023; 9:67. [PMID: 37580823 PMCID: PMC10426152 DOI: 10.1186/s40900-023-00480-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 08/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The growth of data science and artificial intelligence offers novel healthcare applications and research possibilities. Patients should be able to make informed choices about using healthcare. Therefore, they must be provided with lay information about new technology. A team consisting of academic researchers, health professionals, and public contributors collaboratively co-designed and co-developed the new resource offering that information. In this paper, we evaluate this novel approach to co-production. METHODS We used participatory evaluation to understand the co-production process. This consisted of creative approaches and reflexivity over three stages. Firstly, everyone had an opportunity to participate in three online training sessions. The first one focused on the aims of evaluation, the second on photovoice (that included practical training on using photos as metaphors), and the third on being reflective (recognising one's biases and perspectives during analysis). During the second stage, using photovoice, everyone took photos that symbolised their experiences of being involved in the project. This included a session with a professional photographer. At the last stage, we met in person and, using data collected from photovoice, built the mandala as a representation of a joint experience of the project. This stage was supported by professional artists who summarised the mandala in the illustration. RESULTS The mandala is the artistic presentation of the findings from the evaluation. It is a shared journey between everyone involved. We divided it into six related layers. Starting from inside layers present the following experiences (1) public contributors had space to build confidence in a new topic, (2) relationships between individuals and within the project, (3) working remotely during the COVID-19 pandemic, (4) motivation that influenced people to become involved in this particular piece of work, (5) requirements that co-production needs to be inclusive and accessible to everyone, (6) expectations towards data science and artificial intelligence that researchers should follow to establish public support. CONCLUSIONS The participatory evaluation suggests that co-production around data science and artificial intelligence can be a meaningful process that is co-owned by everyone involved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kelly Gleason
- Imperial Cancer Research UK Lead Nurse, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Jonathan J Gregory
- Computational Oncology Group, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Martha Martin
- School of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Kabelo Murray
- School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Northwest London, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Helen Ward
- School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Northwest London, Imperial College London, London, UK
- National Institute for Health Research Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| | - Dorota Chapko
- School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Northwest London, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Spriggs MJ, Murphy-Beiner A, Murphy R, Bornemann J, Thurgur H, Schlag AK. ARC: a framework for access, reciprocity and conduct in psychedelic therapies. Front Psychol 2023; 14:1119115. [PMID: 37251069 PMCID: PMC10211333 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1119115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2022] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2023] Open
Abstract
The field of psychedelic assisted therapy (PAT) is growing at an unprecedented pace. The immense pressures this places on those working in this burgeoning field have already begun to raise important questions about risk and responsibility. It is imperative that the development of an ethical and equitable infrastructure for psychedelic care is prioritized to support this rapid expansion of PAT in research and clinical settings. Here we present Access, Reciprocity and Conduct (ARC); a framework for a culturally informed ethical infrastructure for ARC in psychedelic therapies. These three parallel yet interdependent pillars of ARC provide the bedrock for a sustainable psychedelic infrastructure which prioritized equal access to PAT for those in need of mental health treatment (Access), promotes the safety of those delivering and receiving PAT in clinical contexts (Conduct), and respects the traditional and spiritual uses of psychedelic medicines which often precede their clinical use (Reciprocity). In the development of ARC, we are taking a novel dual-phase co-design approach. The first phase involves co-development of an ethics statement for each arm with stakeholders from research, industry, therapy, community, and indigenous settings. A second phase will further disseminate the statements for collaborative review to a wider audience from these different stakeholder communities within the psychedelic therapy field to invite feedback and further refinement. By presenting ARC at this early stage, we hope to draw upon the collective wisdom of the wider psychedelic community and inspire the open dialogue and collaboration upon which the process of co-design depends. We aim to offer a framework through which psychedelic researchers, therapists and other stakeholders, may begin tackling the complex ethical questions arising within their own organizations and individual practice of PAT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meg J. Spriggs
- Division of Psychiatry, Department of Brain Sciences, Centre for Psychedelic Research, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
- Drug Science, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ashleigh Murphy-Beiner
- Division of Psychiatry, Department of Brain Sciences, Centre for Psychedelic Research, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Roberta Murphy
- Division of Psychiatry, Department of Brain Sciences, Centre for Psychedelic Research, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
- South West London and St George’s Mental Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Julia Bornemann
- Division of Psychiatry, Department of Brain Sciences, Centre for Psychedelic Research, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
- Drug Science, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Anne K. Schlag
- Division of Psychiatry, Department of Brain Sciences, Centre for Psychedelic Research, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
- Drug Science, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Murphy R, Kettner H, Zeifman R, Giribaldi B, Kartner L, Martell J, Read T, Murphy-Beiner A, Baker-Jones M, Nutt D, Erritzoe D, Watts R, Carhart-Harris R. Therapeutic Alliance and Rapport Modulate Responses to Psilocybin Assisted Therapy for Depression. Front Pharmacol 2022; 12:788155. [PMID: 35431912 PMCID: PMC9009076 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.788155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2021] [Accepted: 12/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Across psychotherapeutic frameworks, the strength of the therapeutic alliance has been found to correlate with treatment outcomes; however, its role has never been formally assessed in a trial of psychedelic-assisted therapy. We aimed to investigate the relationships between therapeutic alliance and rapport, the quality of the acute psychedelic experience and treatment outcomes. Methods: This 2-arm double-blind randomized controlled trial compared escitalopram with psychedelic-assisted therapy for moderate-severe depressive disorder (N = 59). This analysis focused on the psilocybin condition (n = 30), who received two oral doses of 25 mg psilocybin, 3-weeks apart, with psychological preparation, in-session support, and integration therapy. A new psychedelic therapy model, called “Accept-Connect-Embody” (ACE), was developed in this trial. The primary outcome was depression severity 6 weeks post treatment (Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, QIDS-SR-16). Path analyses tested the hypothesis that therapeutic alliance (Scale To Assess the Therapeutic Relationship Patient Version, STAR-P) would predict depression outcomes via its influence on the acute psychedelic experience, specifically emotional-breakthrough (EBI) and mystical-type experiences (MEQ). The same analysis was performed on the escitalopram arm to test specificity. Results: The strength of therapeutic alliance predicted pre-session rapport, greater emotional-breakthrough and mystical-type experience (maximum EBI and MEQ scores across the two psilocybin sessions) and final QIDS scores (β = −0.22, R2 = 0.42 for EBIMax; β = −0.19, R2 = 0.32 for MEQMax). Exploratory path models revealed that final depression outcomes were more strongly affected by emotional breakthrough during the first, and mystical experience during the second session. Emotional breakthrough, but not mystical experience, during the first session had a positive effect on therapeutic alliance ahead of the second session (β = 0.79, p < 0.0001). Therapeutic alliance ahead of the second session had a direct impact on final depression scores, not mediated by the acute experience, with a weaker alliance ahead of the second psilocybin session predicting higher absolute depression scores at endpoint (β = −0.49, p < 0.001) Discussion: Future research could consider therapist training and characteristics; specific participant factors, e.g., attachment style or interpersonal trauma, which may underlie the quality of the therapeutic relationship, the psychedelic experience and clinical outcomes; and consider how therapeutic approaches might adapt in cases of weaker therapeutic alliance. Clinical Trial Registration: This trial is registered at http://clinicaltrials.gov, identifier (NCT03429075).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberta Murphy
- Department of Brain Sciences, Centre for Psychedelic Research, Imperial College London, Faculty of Medicine, London, United Kingdom
- Medical Psychotherapy, South West London and St. Georges NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
- *Correspondence: Roberta Murphy,
| | - Hannes Kettner
- Department of Brain Sciences, Centre for Psychedelic Research, Imperial College London, Faculty of Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rick Zeifman
- Department of Brain Sciences, Centre for Psychedelic Research, Imperial College London, Faculty of Medicine, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Psychology, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Bruna Giribaldi
- Department of Brain Sciences, Centre for Psychedelic Research, Imperial College London, Faculty of Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Laura Kartner
- Department of Brain Sciences, Centre for Psychedelic Research, Imperial College London, Faculty of Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jonny Martell
- Department of Brain Sciences, Centre for Psychedelic Research, Imperial College London, Faculty of Medicine, London, United Kingdom
- Medical Psychotherapy and General Adult Psychiatry, Devon Partnership NHS Trust, Exeter, United Kingdom
| | - Tim Read
- Department of Brain Sciences, Centre for Psychedelic Research, Imperial College London, Faculty of Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ashleigh Murphy-Beiner
- Department of Brain Sciences, Centre for Psychedelic Research, Imperial College London, Faculty of Medicine, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway University, Surrey, United Kingdom
| | - Michelle Baker-Jones
- Department of Brain Sciences, Centre for Psychedelic Research, Imperial College London, Faculty of Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - David Nutt
- Department of Brain Sciences, Centre for Psychedelic Research, Imperial College London, Faculty of Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - David Erritzoe
- Department of Brain Sciences, Centre for Psychedelic Research, Imperial College London, Faculty of Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rosalind Watts
- Department of Brain Sciences, Centre for Psychedelic Research, Imperial College London, Faculty of Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Robin Carhart-Harris
- Department of Brain Sciences, Centre for Psychedelic Research, Imperial College London, Faculty of Medicine, London, United Kingdom
- Psychedelics Division Neuroscape, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Spriggs MJ, Douglass HM, Park RJ, Read T, Danby JL, de Magalhães FJC, Alderton KL, Williams TM, Blemings A, Lafrance A, Nicholls DE, Erritzoe D, Nutt DJ, Carhart-Harris RL. Study Protocol for "Psilocybin as a Treatment for Anorexia Nervosa: A Pilot Study". Front Psychiatry 2021; 12:735523. [PMID: 34744825 PMCID: PMC8563607 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.735523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2021] [Accepted: 09/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Anorexia nervosa (AN) is a serious and life-threatening psychiatric condition. With a paucity of approved treatments, there is a desperate need for novel treatment avenues to be explored. Here, we present (1) an overview of the ways through which Public Patient Involvement (PPI) has informed a trial of psilocybin-assisted therapy for AN and (2) a protocol for a pilot study of psilocybin-assisted therapy in AN currently underway at Imperial College London. The study aims to assess the feasibility, brain mechanisms and preliminary outcomes of treating anorexia nervosa with psilocybin. Methods: (1) PPI: Across two online focus groups, eleven individuals with lived experience of AN were presented with an overview of the protocol. Their feedback not only identified solutions to possible barriers for future participants, but also helped the research team to better understand the concept of "recovery" from the perspective of those with lived experience. (2) Protocol: Twenty female participants [21-65 years old, body mass index (BMI) 15 kg/m2 or above] will receive three oral doses of psilocybin (up to 25 mg) over a 6-week period delivered in a therapeutic environment and enveloped by psychological preparation and integration. We will work with participant support networks (care teams and an identified support person) throughout and there will be an extended remote follow-up period of 12 months. Our two-fold primary outcomes are (1) psychopathology (Eating Disorder Examination) across the 6-month follow-up and (2) readiness and motivation to engage in recovery (Readiness and Motivation Questionnaire) across the 6-week trial period. Neurophysiological outcome measures will be: (1) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) brain changes from baseline to 6-week endpoint and (2) post-acute changes in electroencephalography (EEG) activity, including an electrophysiological marker of neuronal plasticity. Discussion: The results of this pilot study will not only shed light on the acceptability, brain mechanisms, and impression of the potential efficacy of psilocybin as an adjunct treatment for AN but will be essential in shaping a subsequent Randomised Control Trial (RCT) that would test this treatment against a suitable control condition. Clinical Trial Registration: identifier: NCT04505189.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meg J. Spriggs
- Centre for Psychedelic Research, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Hannah M. Douglass
- Centre for Psychedelic Research, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rebecca J. Park
- OxBREaD Research Group, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Tim Read
- Centre for Psychedelic Research, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jennifer L. Danby
- Centre for Psychedelic Research, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Kirsty L. Alderton
- Centre for Psychedelic Research, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Tim M. Williams
- Centre for Psychedelic Research, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Allan Blemings
- Centre for Psychedelic Research, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Adele Lafrance
- School of Rural and Northern Health, Laurentian University, Sudbury, ON, Canada
| | - Dasha E. Nicholls
- Division of Psychiatry, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - David Erritzoe
- Centre for Psychedelic Research, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - David J. Nutt
- Centre for Psychedelic Research, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Robin L. Carhart-Harris
- Centre for Psychedelic Research, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bornemann J, Close JB, Spriggs MJ, Carhart-Harris R, Roseman L. Self-Medication for Chronic Pain Using Classic Psychedelics: A Qualitative Investigation to Inform Future Research. Front Psychiatry 2021; 12:735427. [PMID: 34867525 PMCID: PMC8632941 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.735427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2021] [Accepted: 10/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Chronic Pain is among the leading causes of disability worldwide with up to 60% of patients suffering from comorbid depression. Psychedelic-assisted therapy has recently been found effective in treating a host of mental health issues including depression and has historically been found to be useful in treating pain. Reports of self-medication for chronic pain using psychedelic drugs have been widely documented, with anecdotal evidence indicating widespread success in a range of pathologies. Aims: In preparation for an upcoming trial, to better understand how those with lived experience of chronic pain self-medicate with psychedelic drugs, and to establish, in detail, their therapeutic protocols and practices for success. Methods: As part of patient-involvement (PI) for an upcoming trial in this population, 11 individuals who reported self-medicating with psychedelic drugs took part in a 1-h semi-structured discussion, which was then transcribed and thematically analyzed. Results: Across a range of psychedelic substances and doses, reported pain scores improved substantially during and after psychedelic experiences. Two processes, Positive Reframing and Somatic Presence, were reliably identified as playing a role in improvements in mental wellbeing, relationship with pain, and physical (dis)comfort. Inclusion of other strategies such as mindfulness, breathwork, and movement were also widely reported. Due to the data's subjective nature, this paper is vulnerable to bias and makes no claims on causality or generalisability. Together, these results have been used to inform study design for a forthcoming trial. Conclusion: This pre-trial PI work gives us confidence to test psychedelic therapy for chronic pain in a forthcoming controlled trial. The results presented here will be instrumental in improving our ability to meet the needs of future study participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Bornemann
- Centre for Psychedelic Research, Division of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - James B Close
- Centre for Psychedelic Research, Division of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Meg J Spriggs
- Centre for Psychedelic Research, Division of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Robin Carhart-Harris
- Centre for Psychedelic Research, Division of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.,Psychedelics Division, Neurology, Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Leor Roseman
- Centre for Psychedelic Research, Division of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|