Determinants of quality of life of cancer patients at a tertiary care medical city in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Utility and Implementation of the Distress Thermometer for Cancer Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study From Saudi Arabia

Background Cancer patients suffer from variable degrees of distress. The distress thermometer (DT) is a valuable tool for screening those patients for distress. Few studies have addressed the utility of DT in screening cancer patients in Saudi Arabia. We aimed to measure the distress level of adult cancer patients utilizing the DT and identify the appropriate measures and interventions required to improve this population's well-being. Methods This cross-sectional study was carried out at the oncology center of King Saud University Medical City (KSUMC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Enrollment criteria were Saudi adults (≥14 years old), with a diagnosis of cancer, who gave informed consent. They were screened for distress using the DT and its associated problem list (PL). A workflow for a psycho-oncology supportive program was suggested. Results Using DT at a cut-off score of ≥4, 22% of patients had significant distress. The most frequent problems reported were loss/change of physical activity, swelling/edema, change in eating, family health problems, and child care. The multivariable binary regression analysis showed that sadness, depression, worry/anxiety, fear, loss of interest, change in appearance, taking care of myself, swelling/edema, and memory/concentration problems were independent factors for significant distress in our cohort. The suggested workflow could effectively be implemented among cancer patients. Conclusion The current study's findings support previous reports concerning the utility of DT in screening cancer patients for distress. A considerable number of Saudi cancer patients suffered from significant distress, which was significantly related to the emotional, spiritual, social, and religious aspects of their problems. We suggested a workflow by which cancer centers can implement DT screening after developing a plan for timely distress evaluation, with further proper management and referrals accordingly. Additional studies are warranted.

Quality of Life of Patients With Cancer at the Beni Mellal Oncology Center

OBJECTIVES

Cancer and its treatments significantly impact individuals' lives and quality of life (QOL). Research on QOL examines these effects, encompassing physical, psychological, and social aspects. Understanding QOL factors is vital for both patients and clinicians. The evaluation of QOL of patients with cancer and its associated predictive factors has not been previously investigated within the Beni Mellal-Khenifra region of Morocco. Our primary aim was to assess the QOL experienced by patients while simultaneously identifying the determinants and predictors influencing it.

METHODS

Patients were enrolled in a cross-sectional study conducted at the Beni Mellal Oncology Center. Each participant was required to fill out the Moroccan Arabic version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 questionnaire, along with a supplemental questionnaire gathering sociodemographic information. A linear regression analysis was executed to ascertain predictors of the Global Health Status (GHS) and 5 functional scales. The statistical analysis was carried out using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) v25 software.

RESULTS

Our study included 369 patients, with an average age of 52.89. The mean score on the QLQC30 GHS Scale was 64.97. Notably, this score exhibited positive correlations with emotional, social, and role functioning scales, while demonstrating negative correlations with prostate and lung cancers, as well as the presence of pain. Furthermore, the presence of fatigue exhibited associations with all functioning scales, except for social functioning.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients exhibited a favorable GHS. However, it is noteworthy that prostate cancer, lung cancer, the presence of pain, and diminished emotional, social, and role functioning emerged as independent factors significantly associated with poorer GHS.

Understanding the Quality of Life Among Patients With Cancer in Saudi Arabia: Insights From a Cross-Sectional Study

INTRODUCTION

Cancer patients' quality of life (QoL) significantly influences treatment response and mortality rates. Understanding QoL domains among patients with cancer and what affects it can help create interventions that improve QoL and ease patients' experience. This study measures the OoL among patients with cancer and influencing factors.

METHODS

A prospective cross-sectional questionnaire-based study included cancer patients aged >18 currently receiving treatment. The questionnaire collected social and economic data, followed by the validated Arabic version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30). Means and standard deviations for described numeric variables and frequencies and percentages described categorical variables. Analysis of variance, F-tests, and P-values were reported.

RESULTS

Among 182 cancer patients, 60% were female. Younger patients exhibited higher QoL in physical and role functioning (P = .016 and .03) and experienced more significant financial impact (P = .0144). Females reported more adverse effects from cancer symptoms, including fatigue, nausea, vomiting, and pain (36.7% vs 25.5%, P = .005; 20.6% vs 11.5%, P = .0186; 34.7% vs 25.1%, P = .0281). Single patients had superior QoL in physical functioning compared to others (P = .0127). Patients traveling long distances were more likely to face adverse financial consequences (P = .007). Asthmatic patients exhibited lower QoL in physical, role, and cognitive functioning (72.3 vs 37.8, P = .0147; 76.4 vs 22.2, P = .0024; 84.7 vs 44.4, P = .0038) and reported increased dyspnea and appetite loss (16 vs 55.6 and 26.1 vs 66.7, both P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Factors influencing QoL in Saudi cancer patients include age, marital status, gender, hospital distance, and chronic conditions. Thus emphasizing the necessity for personalized care strategies to enhance outcomes and alleviate the overall burden of cancer care.