1
|
Almeida-Santos AC, Duarte B, Tedim AP, Teixeira MJ, Prata JC, Azevedo RMS, Novais C, Peixe L, Freitas AR. The healthy human gut can take it all: vancomycin-variable, linezolid-resistant strains and specific bacteriocin-species interplay in Enterococcus spp. Appl Environ Microbiol 2024:e0169924. [PMID: 39699199 DOI: 10.1128/aem.01699-24] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2024] [Accepted: 11/19/2024] [Indexed: 12/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Enterococcus spp. are opportunistic human pathogens colonizing the human gut and a significant reservoir for the continuous adaptation of hospital clones. However, studies on the features of enterococci species co-colonizing healthy individuals are scarce. We investigated the prevalence, antibiotic resistance, and bacteriocin profiles of Enterococcus species in fecal samples from healthy adults in Portugal using culture-based methods, WGS, and bacteriocin inhibition assays. Results were compared with data from a 2001 study in the same region. Enterococcus spp. (n = 315; 24% MDR) were recovered from all volunteers. Enterococcus lactis was the prevalent species (75%), followed by Enterococcus faecalis (65%) and Enterococcus faecium (47%). E. lactis prevalence increased 2.5-fold since 2001. Linezolid resistance genes (optrA/poxtA) were detected in E. faecium and Enterococcus thailandicus isolates, while a vancomycin-variable E. faecium was also identified. Virulence and plasmid profiles were diverse across species, with evidence of exchange of virulence markers and plasmid replicons between E. faecium and E. lactis. Bacteriocin gene repertoires were extensive and species-specific. Higher numbers of bacteriocin genes were associated with stronger inhibition profiles, and 25% of E. faecium and E. lactis isolates were capable of inhibiting relevant VRE clones. This study unveils the co-occurrence and ecological dynamics of Enterococcus species in the healthy human gut, reinforcing its role as a reservoir for key antibiotic resistance genes and potentially pathogenic strains. The shift toward E. lactis prevalence and the detection of linezolid resistance genes in healthy individuals underscore the need for ongoing surveillance of the gut microbiome to guide public health strategies and antibiotic stewardship efforts.IMPORTANCEThis study highlights the role of Enterococcus species in the healthy human gut, revealing important insights into their prevalence and antibiotic resistance. It emphasizes that the human gut serves as a significant reservoir for antibiotic-resistant strains and shows a notable increase and prevalence of Enterococcus lactis, which has been underappreciated due to identification challenges. The research also underscores the bacteriocins' role in microbial competition, where commensal strains inhibit clinical VRE, potentially aiding the restoration of the gut microbiota, after antibiotic treatment. The findings accentuate the need for ongoing surveillance to track changes in gut bacteria, especially with the emergence of resistance genes to last resort antibiotics. Such monitoring is crucial for shaping public health strategies and managing the growing threat of antibiotic-resistant infections. Profiling bacteriocins at the species and strain level can identify ecological adaptation factors and inform strategies to target high-risk clones.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana C Almeida-Santos
- UCIBIO, Unidade de Ciências Biomoleculares Aplicadas, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Laboratório Associado i4HB, Instituto para a Saúde e a Bioeconomia, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Bárbara Duarte
- UCIBIO, Unidade de Ciências Biomoleculares Aplicadas, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Laboratório Associado i4HB, Instituto para a Saúde e a Bioeconomia, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Ana P Tedim
- Grupo de Investigación Biomédica en Sepsis - BioSepsis, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES, CB22/06/00035), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Maria J Teixeira
- Laboratório Associado i4HB, Instituto para a Saúde e a Bioeconomia, Instituto Universitário de Ciências da Saúde, IUCS-CESPU, Gandra, Portugal
- UCIBIO, Unidade de Ciências Biomoleculares Aplicadas, Instituto Universitário de Ciências da Saúde (1H-TOXRUN, IUCS-CESPU), Gandra, Portugal
| | - Joana C Prata
- Laboratório Associado i4HB, Instituto para a Saúde e a Bioeconomia, Instituto Universitário de Ciências da Saúde, IUCS-CESPU, Gandra, Portugal
- UCIBIO, Unidade de Ciências Biomoleculares Aplicadas, Instituto Universitário de Ciências da Saúde (1H-TOXRUN, IUCS-CESPU), Gandra, Portugal
| | - Rui M S Azevedo
- Laboratório Associado i4HB, Instituto para a Saúde e a Bioeconomia, Instituto Universitário de Ciências da Saúde, IUCS-CESPU, Gandra, Portugal
- UCIBIO, Unidade de Ciências Biomoleculares Aplicadas, Instituto Universitário de Ciências da Saúde (1H-TOXRUN, IUCS-CESPU), Gandra, Portugal
| | - Carla Novais
- UCIBIO, Unidade de Ciências Biomoleculares Aplicadas, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Laboratório Associado i4HB, Instituto para a Saúde e a Bioeconomia, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Luísa Peixe
- UCIBIO, Unidade de Ciências Biomoleculares Aplicadas, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Laboratório Associado i4HB, Instituto para a Saúde e a Bioeconomia, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Ana R Freitas
- UCIBIO, Unidade de Ciências Biomoleculares Aplicadas, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Laboratório Associado i4HB, Instituto para a Saúde e a Bioeconomia, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Laboratório Associado i4HB, Instituto para a Saúde e a Bioeconomia, Instituto Universitário de Ciências da Saúde, IUCS-CESPU, Gandra, Portugal
- UCIBIO, Unidade de Ciências Biomoleculares Aplicadas, Instituto Universitário de Ciências da Saúde (1H-TOXRUN, IUCS-CESPU), Gandra, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lopes J, de Lencastre H, Conceição T. Genomic analysis of Enterococcus faecium from non-clinical settings: antimicrobial resistance, virulence, and clonal population in livestock and the urban environment. Front Microbiol 2024; 15:1466990. [PMID: 39323892 PMCID: PMC11422121 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1466990] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2024] [Accepted: 08/20/2024] [Indexed: 09/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Enterococci are commensals of the gastrointestinal tract of humans and animals that evolved into opportunistic pathogens with high antimicrobial resistance and virulence. Multidrug-resistant Enterococcus is a major cause of hospital-acquired infections worldwide. For this reason, the characterization of non-clinical reservoirs of Enterococci and their epidemiological link to resistant hospital isolates is crucial for controlling their spread. Methods A total of 295 samples collected from livestock (pigs and cows, n = 135) and environment (public buses, passengers hands, and urban environments, n = 160) were screened for Enterococcus spp. E. faecium antimicrobial resistance profiles, virulence potential, and clonal population were further characterized. Results Enterococci were detected in 90.5% (n = 267) of the samples, with a higher prevalence in livestock (100%) than the environment (82.5%, p < 0.0001), but none of the isolates exhibited vancomycin resistance. E. faecalis was the most prevalent species (51.7%), predominantly found in livestock (62.2%), while E. faecium was more common in the environment. Of the 59 E. faecium isolates, 78% showed resistance to ≥3 antibiotic classes and contained associated resistance genes, namely tetracyclines (tetM and tetL), beta-lactams (mutations in pbp5), and high-level resistance to aminoglycosides (ant(6)-Ia and aac(6')-aph(2″)). A wide array of virulence factors was detected among E. faecium, associated with adherence, biofilm formation, and adaptation to host response, while hospital-associated virulence markers, such as IS16, were less frequent, probably due to the non-clinical nature of the isolates. Clonal population analysis revealed a diverse E. faecium population. Although no direct epidemiological link could be traced between our isolates and specific clinical isolates, infection-associated genetic backgrounds were identified in non-clinical isolates: one isolate from pigs belonged to CC17 (ST32), while four isolates belonged to CC94, including one recovered from pigs (ST296), one from cows (ST2206), one from the urban environment (ST1205), and other from buses (ST800). Discussion This study underscores a high prevalence of clinically relevant Enterococcus species among healthy livestock and the environment. Despite the absence of vancomycin resistance and limited hospital infection-associated clonal lineages, the presence of E. faecium with significant virulence potential and resistance to critical antibiotics in human and veterinary medicine highlights the need for continuing surveillance of non-clinical reservoirs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jéssica Lopes
- Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica António Xavier, Universidade Nova de Lisboa (ITQB NOVA), Oeiras, Portugal
| | - Hermínia de Lencastre
- Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica António Xavier, Universidade Nova de Lisboa (ITQB NOVA), Oeiras, Portugal
- Laboratory of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Teresa Conceição
- Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica António Xavier, Universidade Nova de Lisboa (ITQB NOVA), Oeiras, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zaidi SEZ, Zaheer R, Zovoilis A, McAllister TA. Enterococci as a One Health indicator of antimicrobial resistance. Can J Microbiol 2024; 70:303-335. [PMID: 38696839 DOI: 10.1139/cjm-2024-0024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/04/2024]
Abstract
The rapid increase of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria in humans and livestock is concerning. Antimicrobials are essential for the treatment of disease in modern day medicine, and their misuse in humans and food animals has contributed to an increase in the prevalence of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria. Globally, antimicrobial resistance is recognized as a One Health problem affecting humans, animals, and environment. Enterococcal species are Gram-positive bacteria that are widely distributed in nature. Their occurrence, prevalence, and persistence across the One Health continuum make them an ideal candidate to study antimicrobial resistance from a One Health perspective. The objective of this review was to summarize the role of enterococci as an indicator of antimicrobial resistance across One Health sectors. We also briefly address the prevalence of enterococci in human, animal, and environmental settings. In addition, a 16S RNA gene-based phylogenetic tree was constructed to visualize the evolutionary relationship among enterococcal species and whether they segregate based on host environment. We also review the genomic basis of antimicrobial resistance in enterococcal species across the One Health continuum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sani-E-Zehra Zaidi
- Lethbridge Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge, AB T1J 4B1, Canada
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Lethbridge, 4401 University Drive, Lethbridge, AB T1K 3M4, Canada
- University of Manitoba, Department of Biochemistry and Medical Genetics, 745 Bannatyne Ave, Winnipeg
| | - Rahat Zaheer
- Lethbridge Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge, AB T1J 4B1, Canada
| | - Athanasios Zovoilis
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Lethbridge, 4401 University Drive, Lethbridge, AB T1K 3M4, Canada
- University of Manitoba, Department of Biochemistry and Medical Genetics, 745 Bannatyne Ave, Winnipeg
| | - Tim A McAllister
- Lethbridge Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge, AB T1J 4B1, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ladyhina V, Sternberg-Lewerin S, Andersson L, Rajala E. Antimicrobial resistance among indicator Enterococcus faecium and Escherichia coli in Swedish pig farms. Acta Vet Scand 2024; 66:34. [PMID: 39020377 PMCID: PMC11256653 DOI: 10.1186/s13028-024-00756-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2024] [Accepted: 07/09/2024] [Indexed: 07/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Monitoring the use of antimicrobials and the emergence of resistance in animals and people is important for the control of antimicrobial resistance, and for establishing sustainable and effective disease management practices. In this study, we used Enterococcus spp. and Escherichia coli as indicator species to investigate antimicrobial susceptibility patterns and how these change over time, on ten Swedish pig farms. Indoor environmental sock sampling was performed once a month during the entire production cycle of one batch of pigs on each farm, resulting in 60 samples collected in total. Selective culture for E. coli and Enterococcus spp. resulted in 122 isolates of E. coli, 74 isolates of E. faecium, but no isolates of E. faecalis. Microdilution was used to determine minimum inhibitory concentrations for twelve antimicrobial substances in E. coli and fifteen substances in E. faecium. The overall prevalence of resistance was low. Among the E. coli isolates, the proportions non-wild type (resistant, NWT) isolates were as follows: azithromycin and amikacin 1% (n = 1), trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole 2% (n = 3), ampicillin 6% (n = 7) and tetracycline 9% (n = 11). Among the E. faecium isolates, the NWT proportions were: teicoplanin, linezolid and gentamicin 1% (n = 1), daptomycin 3% (n = 2), erythromycin 26% (n = 19), tetracycline 27% (n = 20), quinupristin/dalfopristin 58% (n = 42). The resistance patterns differed between the farms, likely due to different antimicrobial use, biosecurity measures and source of the animals. The NWT prevalence among E. coli decreased over time, whereas no similar trend could be observed in E. faecium. The results of the current study illustrate the complex factors affecting the antimicrobial resistance patterns observed on each farm, indicating that specific practices and risk factors have an impact on the prevalence and type of antimicrobial resistance. Further studies of the farm environments in combination with antimicrobial use and other risk factor data are needed to elucidate the multifaceted drivers of antimicrobial resistance development on livestock farms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valeriia Ladyhina
- Division of Bacteriology and Food Safety, Department of Animal Biosciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 7054, 750 07, Uppsala, Sweden.
| | - Susanna Sternberg-Lewerin
- Division of Bacteriology and Food Safety, Department of Animal Biosciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 7054, 750 07, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Linus Andersson
- Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology (IMBIM), Uppsala University, P.O. Box 582, 751 23, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Elisabeth Rajala
- Division of Bacteriology and Food Safety, Department of Animal Biosciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 7054, 750 07, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Almansour AM, Alhadlaq MA, Alzahrani KO, Mukhtar LE, Alharbi AL, Alajel SM. The Silent Threat: Antimicrobial-Resistant Pathogens in Food-Producing Animals and Their Impact on Public Health. Microorganisms 2023; 11:2127. [PMID: 37763971 PMCID: PMC10537193 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11092127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2023] [Revised: 08/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
The emergence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global health problem without geographic boundaries. This increases the risk of complications and, thus, makes it harder to treat infections, which can result in higher healthcare costs and a greater number of deaths. Antimicrobials are often used to treat infections from pathogens in food-producing animals, making them a potential source of AMR. Overuse and misuse of these drugs in animal agriculture can lead to the development of AMR bacteria, which can then be transmitted to humans through contaminated food or direct contact. It is therefore essential to take multifaceted, comprehensive, and integrated measures, following the One Health approach. To address this issue, many countries have implemented regulations to limit antimicrobial use. To our knowledge, there are previous studies based on AMR in food-producing animals; however, this paper adds novelty related to the AMR pathogens in livestock, as we include the recent publications of this field worldwide. In this work, we aim to describe the most critical and high-risk AMR pathogens among food-producing animals, as a worldwide health problem. We also focus on the dissemination of AMR genes in livestock, as well as its consequences in animals and humans, and future strategies to tackle this threat.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayidh M. Almansour
- Molecular Biology Division, Reference Laboratory for Microbiology, Executive Department of Reference Laboratories, Research and Laboratories Sector, Saudi Food and Drug Authority (SFDA), Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia; (M.A.A.); (K.O.A.); (A.L.A.)
| | - Meshari A. Alhadlaq
- Molecular Biology Division, Reference Laboratory for Microbiology, Executive Department of Reference Laboratories, Research and Laboratories Sector, Saudi Food and Drug Authority (SFDA), Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia; (M.A.A.); (K.O.A.); (A.L.A.)
| | - Khaloud O. Alzahrani
- Molecular Biology Division, Reference Laboratory for Microbiology, Executive Department of Reference Laboratories, Research and Laboratories Sector, Saudi Food and Drug Authority (SFDA), Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia; (M.A.A.); (K.O.A.); (A.L.A.)
| | - Lenah E. Mukhtar
- Antimicrobial Resistance Division, Reference Laboratory for Microbiology, Executive Department of Reference Laboratories, Research and Laboratories Sector, Saudi Food and Drug Authority (SFDA), Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia;
| | - Abdulmohsen L. Alharbi
- Molecular Biology Division, Reference Laboratory for Microbiology, Executive Department of Reference Laboratories, Research and Laboratories Sector, Saudi Food and Drug Authority (SFDA), Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia; (M.A.A.); (K.O.A.); (A.L.A.)
| | - Sulaiman M. Alajel
- Reference Laboratory for Microbiology, Executive Department of Reference Laboratories, Research and Laboratories Sector, Saudi Food and Drug Authority (SFDA), Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia;
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ha HTA, Nguyen PTL, Hung TTM, Tuan LA, Thuy BT, Lien THM, Thai PD, Thanh NH, Bich VTN, Anh TH, Hanh NTH, Minh NT, Thanh DP, Mai SNT, The HC, Trung NV, Thu NH, Duong TN, Anh DD, Ngoc PT, Bañuls AL, Choisy M, van Doorn HR, Suzuki M, Hoang TH. Prevalence and Associated Factors of optrA-Positive- Enterococcus faecalis in Different Reservoirs around Farms in Vietnam. Antibiotics (Basel) 2023; 12:954. [PMID: 37370273 PMCID: PMC10294904 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics12060954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Revised: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 05/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Linezolid is an antibiotic of last resort for the treatment of infections caused by Gram-positive bacteria, including vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Enterococcus faecalis, a member of enterococci, is a significant pathogen in nosocomial infections. E. faecalis resistance to linezolid is frequently related to the presence of optrA, which is often co-carried with fex, phenicol exporter genes, and erm genes encoding macrolide resistance. Therefore, the common use of antibiotics in veterinary might promote the occurrence of optrA in livestock settings. This is a cross-sectional study aiming to investigate the prevalence of optrA positive E. faecalis (OPEfs) in 6 reservoirs in farms in Ha Nam province, Vietnam, and its associated factors and to explore genetic relationships of OPEfs isolates. Among 639 collected samples, the prevalence of OPEfs was highest in flies, 46.8% (51/109), followed by chickens 37.3% (72/193), dogs 33.3% (17/51), humans 18.7% (26/139), wastewater 16.4% (11/67) and pigs 11.3%, (14/80). The total feeding area and total livestock unit of the farm were associated with the presence of OPEfs in chickens, flies, and wastewater. Among 186 OPEfs strains, 86% were resistant to linezolid. The presence of optrA was also related to the resistant phenotype against linezolid and levofloxacin of E. faecalis isolates. Close genotypic relationships identified by Pulsed Field Gel Electrophoresis between OPEfs isolates recovered from flies and other reservoirs including chickens, pigs, dogs, and wastewater suggested the role of flies in the transmission of antibiotic-resistant pathogens. These results provided warnings of linezolid resistance although it is not used in livestock.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hoang Thi An Ha
- Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam; (H.T.A.H.); (T.H.A.)
- Department of Microbiology, Vinh Medical University, Vinh 431000, Vietnam
| | - Phuong Thi Lan Nguyen
- National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam; (P.T.L.N.); (T.T.M.H.); (L.A.T.); (B.T.T.); (T.H.M.L.); (P.D.T.); (N.H.T.); (N.T.H.H.); (N.T.M.); (T.N.D.); (D.D.A.)
| | - Tran Thi Mai Hung
- National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam; (P.T.L.N.); (T.T.M.H.); (L.A.T.); (B.T.T.); (T.H.M.L.); (P.D.T.); (N.H.T.); (N.T.H.H.); (N.T.M.); (T.N.D.); (D.D.A.)
| | - Le Anh Tuan
- National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam; (P.T.L.N.); (T.T.M.H.); (L.A.T.); (B.T.T.); (T.H.M.L.); (P.D.T.); (N.H.T.); (N.T.H.H.); (N.T.M.); (T.N.D.); (D.D.A.)
| | - Bui Thanh Thuy
- National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam; (P.T.L.N.); (T.T.M.H.); (L.A.T.); (B.T.T.); (T.H.M.L.); (P.D.T.); (N.H.T.); (N.T.H.H.); (N.T.M.); (T.N.D.); (D.D.A.)
| | - Tran Hoang My Lien
- National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam; (P.T.L.N.); (T.T.M.H.); (L.A.T.); (B.T.T.); (T.H.M.L.); (P.D.T.); (N.H.T.); (N.T.H.H.); (N.T.M.); (T.N.D.); (D.D.A.)
| | - Pham Duy Thai
- National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam; (P.T.L.N.); (T.T.M.H.); (L.A.T.); (B.T.T.); (T.H.M.L.); (P.D.T.); (N.H.T.); (N.T.H.H.); (N.T.M.); (T.N.D.); (D.D.A.)
| | - Nguyen Ha Thanh
- National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam; (P.T.L.N.); (T.T.M.H.); (L.A.T.); (B.T.T.); (T.H.M.L.); (P.D.T.); (N.H.T.); (N.T.H.H.); (N.T.M.); (T.N.D.); (D.D.A.)
| | - Vu Thi Ngoc Bich
- Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam; (V.T.N.B.); (H.R.v.D.)
| | - Tran Hai Anh
- Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam; (H.T.A.H.); (T.H.A.)
| | - Ngo Thi Hong Hanh
- National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam; (P.T.L.N.); (T.T.M.H.); (L.A.T.); (B.T.T.); (T.H.M.L.); (P.D.T.); (N.H.T.); (N.T.H.H.); (N.T.M.); (T.N.D.); (D.D.A.)
| | - Nguyen Thi Minh
- National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam; (P.T.L.N.); (T.T.M.H.); (L.A.T.); (B.T.T.); (T.H.M.L.); (P.D.T.); (N.H.T.); (N.T.H.H.); (N.T.M.); (T.N.D.); (D.D.A.)
| | - Duy Pham Thanh
- Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam; (D.P.T.); (S.-N.T.M.); (H.C.T.)
| | - Si-Nguyen T. Mai
- Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam; (D.P.T.); (S.-N.T.M.); (H.C.T.)
| | - Hao Chung The
- Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam; (D.P.T.); (S.-N.T.M.); (H.C.T.)
| | - Nguyen Vu Trung
- Pasteur Institute in Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam;
| | | | - Tran Nhu Duong
- National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam; (P.T.L.N.); (T.T.M.H.); (L.A.T.); (B.T.T.); (T.H.M.L.); (P.D.T.); (N.H.T.); (N.T.H.H.); (N.T.M.); (T.N.D.); (D.D.A.)
| | - Dang Duc Anh
- National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam; (P.T.L.N.); (T.T.M.H.); (L.A.T.); (B.T.T.); (T.H.M.L.); (P.D.T.); (N.H.T.); (N.T.H.H.); (N.T.M.); (T.N.D.); (D.D.A.)
| | - Pham Thi Ngoc
- National Institute of Veterinary Research, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam;
| | - Anne-Laure Bañuls
- MIVEGEC (IRD-CNRS-Université de Montpellier), LMI DRISA, Centre IRD, 34394 Montpellier, France;
| | - Marc Choisy
- Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam; (D.P.T.); (S.-N.T.M.); (H.C.T.)
- Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 4BH, UK
| | - H. Rogier van Doorn
- Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam; (V.T.N.B.); (H.R.v.D.)
- Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 4BH, UK
| | - Masato Suzuki
- National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo 162-0052, Japan;
| | - Tran Huy Hoang
- Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam; (H.T.A.H.); (T.H.A.)
- National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam; (P.T.L.N.); (T.T.M.H.); (L.A.T.); (B.T.T.); (T.H.M.L.); (P.D.T.); (N.H.T.); (N.T.H.H.); (N.T.M.); (T.N.D.); (D.D.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ribeiro J, Silva V, Monteiro A, Vieira-Pinto M, Igrejas G, Reis FS, Barros L, Poeta P. Antibiotic Resistance among Gastrointestinal Bacteria in Broilers: A Review Focused on Enterococcus spp. and Escherichia coli. Animals (Basel) 2023; 13:1362. [PMID: 37106925 PMCID: PMC10135345 DOI: 10.3390/ani13081362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Revised: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Chickens can acquire bacteria at different stages, and bacterial diversity can occur due to production practices, diet, and environment. The changes in consumer trends have led to increased animal production, and chicken meat is one of the most consumed meats. To ensure high levels of production, antimicrobials have been used in livestock for therapeutic purposes, disease prevention, and growth promotion, contributing to the development of antimicrobial resistance across the resident microbiota. Enterococcus spp. and Escherichia coli are normal inhabitants of the gastrointestinal microbiota of chickens that can develop strains capable of causing a wide range of diseases, i.e., opportunistic pathogens. Enterococcus spp. isolated from broilers have shown resistance to at least seven classes of antibiotics, while E. coli have shown resistance to at least four. Furthermore, some clonal lineages, such as ST16, ST194, and ST195 in Enterococcus spp. and ST117 in E. coli, have been identified in humans and animals. These data suggest that consuming contaminated animal-source food, direct contact with animals, or environmental exposure can lead to the transmission of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria. Therefore, this review focused on Enterococcus spp. and E. coli from the broiler industry to better understand how antibiotic-resistant strains have emerged, which antibiotic-resistant genes are most common, what clonal lineages are shared between broilers and humans, and their impact through a One Health perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Ribeiro
- Microbiology and Antibiotic Resistance Team (MicroART), Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro (UTAD), 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal
- Associated Laboratory for Green Chemistry (LAQV-REQUIMTE), University NOVA of Lisbon, 2829-516 Lisbon, Portugal
- Centro de Investigação de Montanha (CIMO), Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, Campus de Santa Apolónia, 5300-253 Bragança, Portugal
- Laboratório Associado para a Sustentabilidade e Tecnologia em Regiões de Montanha (SusTEC), Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, Campus de Santa Apolónia, 5300-253 Bragança, Portugal
| | - Vanessa Silva
- Microbiology and Antibiotic Resistance Team (MicroART), Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro (UTAD), 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal
- Associated Laboratory for Green Chemistry (LAQV-REQUIMTE), University NOVA of Lisbon, 2829-516 Lisbon, Portugal
- Department of Genetics and Biotechnology, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro (UTAD), 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal
- Functional Genomics and Proteomics Unit, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro (UTAD), 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal
| | - Andreia Monteiro
- Microbiology and Antibiotic Resistance Team (MicroART), Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro (UTAD), 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal
| | - Madalena Vieira-Pinto
- Associate Laboratory for Animal and Veterinary Science (AL4AnimalS), University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro (UTAD), 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal
- Department of Veterinary Science, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro (UTAD), 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal
- Veterinary and Animal Research Centre (CECAV), University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro (UTAD), 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal
| | - Gilberto Igrejas
- Associated Laboratory for Green Chemistry (LAQV-REQUIMTE), University NOVA of Lisbon, 2829-516 Lisbon, Portugal
- Department of Genetics and Biotechnology, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro (UTAD), 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal
- Functional Genomics and Proteomics Unit, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro (UTAD), 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal
| | - Filipa S. Reis
- Centro de Investigação de Montanha (CIMO), Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, Campus de Santa Apolónia, 5300-253 Bragança, Portugal
- Laboratório Associado para a Sustentabilidade e Tecnologia em Regiões de Montanha (SusTEC), Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, Campus de Santa Apolónia, 5300-253 Bragança, Portugal
| | - Lillian Barros
- Centro de Investigação de Montanha (CIMO), Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, Campus de Santa Apolónia, 5300-253 Bragança, Portugal
- Laboratório Associado para a Sustentabilidade e Tecnologia em Regiões de Montanha (SusTEC), Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, Campus de Santa Apolónia, 5300-253 Bragança, Portugal
| | - Patrícia Poeta
- Microbiology and Antibiotic Resistance Team (MicroART), Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro (UTAD), 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal
- Associate Laboratory for Animal and Veterinary Science (AL4AnimalS), University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro (UTAD), 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal
- Veterinary and Animal Research Centre (CECAV), University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro (UTAD), 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Grudlewska-Buda K, Skowron K, Bauza-Kaszewska J, Budzyńska A, Wiktorczyk-Kapischke N, Wilk M, Wujak M, Paluszak Z. Assessment of antibiotic resistance and biofilm formation of Enterococcus species isolated from different pig farm environments in Poland. BMC Microbiol 2023; 23:89. [PMID: 36997857 PMCID: PMC10061711 DOI: 10.1186/s12866-023-02834-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 04/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Enteroccocus spp. are human opportunistic pathogens causing a variety of serious and life-threating infections in humans, including urinary tract infection, endocarditis, skin infection and bacteraemia. Farm animals and direct contact with them are important sources of Enterococcus faecalis (EFA) and Enterococcus faecium (EFM) infections among farmers, veterinarians and individuals working in breeding farms and abattoirs. The spread of antibiotic-resistant strains is one of the most serious public health concerns, as clinicians will be left without therapeutic options for the management of enterococcal infections. The aim of the study was to evaluate the occurrence and antimicrobial susceptibility of EFA and EFM strains isolated from a pig farm environment and to determine the biofilm formation ability of identified Enterococcus spp. strains. RESULTS A total numer of 160 enterococcal isolates were obtained from 475 samples collected in total (33.7%). Among them, 110 of genetically different strains were identified and classified into EFA (82; 74.5%) and EFM (28; 25.5%). Genetic similarity analysis revealed the presence of 7 and 1 clusters among the EFA and EFM strains, respectively. The highest percentage of EFA strains (16; 19.5%) was resistant to high concentrations of gentamicin. Among the EFM strains, the most frequent strains were resistant to ampicillin and high concentrations of gentamicin (5 each; 17.9%). Six (7.3%) EFA and 4 (14.3%) EFM strains showed vancomycin resistance (VRE - Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus). Linezolid resistance was found in 2 strains of each species. The multiplex PCR analysis was performed to identify the vancomycin resistant enterococci. vanB, vanA and vanD genotypes were detected in 4, 1 and 1 EFA strains, respectively. Four EFA VRE-strains in total, 2 with the vanA and 2 with the vanB genotypes, were identified. The biofilm analysis revealed that all vancomycin-resistant E. faecalis and E. faecium strains demonstrated a higher biofilm-forming capacity, as compared to the susceptible strains. The lowest cell count (5.31 log CFU / cm2) was reisolated from the biofilm produced by the vancomycin-sensitive strain EFM 2. The highest level of re-isolated cells was observed for VRE EFA 25 and VRE EFM 7 strains, for which the number was 7 log CFU / cm2 and 6.75 log CFU / cm2, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The irrational use of antibiotics in agriculture and veterinary practice is considered to be one of the key reasons for the rapid spread of antibiotic resistance among microorganisms. Owing to the fact that piggery environment can be a reservoir of antimicrobial resistance and transmission route of antimicrobial resistance genes from commensal zoonotic bacteria to clinical strains, it is of a great importance to public health to monitor trends in this biological phenomenon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katarzyna Grudlewska-Buda
- Department of Microbiology, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Toruń, Poland
| | - Krzysztof Skowron
- Department of Microbiology, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Toruń, Poland.
| | - Justyna Bauza-Kaszewska
- Department of Microbiology and Food Technology, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Anna Budzyńska
- Department of Microbiology, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Toruń, Poland
| | - Natalia Wiktorczyk-Kapischke
- Department of Microbiology, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Toruń, Poland
| | - Monika Wilk
- Department of Microbiology, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Toruń, Poland
| | - Magdalena Wujak
- Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Toruń, Poland
| | - Zbigniew Paluszak
- Department of Microbiology and Food Technology, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Nüesch-Inderbinen M, Heyvaert L, Treier A, Zurfluh K, Cernela N, Biggel M, Stephan R. High occurrence of Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, and Vagococcus lutrae harbouring oxazolidinone resistance genes in raw meat-based diets for companion animals - a public health issue, Switzerland, September 2018 to May 2020. Euro Surveill 2023; 28:2200496. [PMID: 36757316 PMCID: PMC9912375 DOI: 10.2807/1560-7917.es.2023.28.6.2200496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/10/2023] Open
Abstract
IntroductionEnterococci harbouring genes encoding resistance to florfenicol and the oxazolidinone antimicrobial linezolid have emerged among food-producing animals and meat thereof, but few studies have analysed their occurrence in raw meat-based diets (RMBDs) for pets.AimWe aimed to examine how far RMBDs may represent a source of bacteria with oxazolidinone resistance genes.MethodsFifty-nine samples of different types of RMBDs from 10 suppliers (three based in Germany, seven in Switzerland) were screened for florfenicol-resistant Gram-positive bacteria using a selective culture medium. Isolates were phenotypically and genotypically characterised.ResultsA total of 27 Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, and Vagococcus lutrae isolates were obtained from 24 of the 59 samples. The optrA, poxtA, and cfr genes were identified in 24/27, 6/27 and 5/27 isolates, respectively. Chloramphenicol and linezolid minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) ranged from 24.0 mg/L-256.0 mg/L, and 1.5 mg/L-8.0 mg/L, respectively. According to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) breakpoints, 26 of 27 isolates were resistant to chloramphenicol (MICs ≥ 32 mg/L), and two were resistant to linezolid (MICs ≥ 8 mg/L). Multilocus sequence typing analysis of the 17 E. faecalis isolates identified 10 different sequence types (ST)s, with ST593 (n = 4 isolates) and ST207 (n = 2 isolates) occurring more than once, and two novel STs (n = 2 isolates). E. faecium isolates belonged to four different STs (168, 264, 822, and 1846).ConclusionThe high occurrence in our sample of Gram-positive bacteria harbouring genes encoding resistance to the critical antimicrobial linezolid is of concern since such bacteria may spread from companion animals to humans upon close contact between pets and their owners.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lore Heyvaert
- Department Veterinary and Biosciences, Faculty Veterinary Medicine, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Andrea Treier
- Institute for Food Safety and Hygiene, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Katrin Zurfluh
- Institute for Food Safety and Hygiene, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Nicole Cernela
- Institute for Food Safety and Hygiene, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michael Biggel
- Institute for Food Safety and Hygiene, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Roger Stephan
- Institute for Food Safety and Hygiene, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Onaran Acar B, Cengız G, Goncuoglu M. Vancomycin-variable enterococci in sheep and cattle isolates and whole-genome sequencing analysis of isolates harboring vanM and vanB genes. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH 2023; 24:182-192. [PMID: 38269016 PMCID: PMC10804430 DOI: 10.22099/ijvr.2023.47465.6855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Revised: 08/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Abstract
Background Vancomycin resistance encoded by the vanA/B/M genes in enterococci is clinically important because of the transmission of these genes between bacteria. While vancomycin resistance is determined by detecting only vanA and vanB genes by routine analyses, failure to detect vanM resistance causes vancomycin resistance to be overlooked, and clinically appropriate treatment cannot be provided. Aims The study aimed to examine the presence of vanM-positive enterococcal isolates in Ankara, Turkey, and to have detailed information about them with sequence analyses. Methods Caecal samples were collected from sheep and cattle during slaughter at different slaughterhouses in Ankara, Turkey. Enterococci isolates were identified, confirmed, and analyzed for the presence of vanA/B/M genes. Antibiotic resistance profiles of isolates were determined by the broth microdilution method. A whole genome sequence analysis of the isolates harboring the vanM and vanB genes was performed. Results 13.7% of enterococcal isolates were determined as Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis. 15% of these isolates contained vanB, and 40% were vanM-positive. S98b and C32 isolates were determined to contain 16 CRISPR-Cas elements. 80% of the enterococci isolates were resistant to nitrofurantoin and 15% to ciprofloxacin. The first vanM-positive vancomycin-variable enterococci (VVE) isolates from food-producing animals were identified, and the S98b strain has been assigned to Genbank with the accession number CP104083.1. Conclusion Therefore, new studies are needed to facilitate the identification of vanM-resistant enterococci and VVE strains.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B. Onaran Acar
- Department of Food Hygiene and Technology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ankara University, 06110, Altindag, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Mireshghi N, Jafari Z, Shojaei Sadi B. Molecular study of Shigella dysenteriae Aminoglycoside Resistance Genes Isolated from Children and its Expression Under the Influence of Curcumin Nanoparticle. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY 2023. [DOI: 10.30699/ijmm.17.1.50] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/18/2023]
|