Resistance to Ceftazidime/Avibactam, Meropenem/Vaborbactam and Imipenem/Relebactam in Gram-Negative MDR Bacilli: Molecular Mechanisms and Susceptibility Testing

Burkholderia cepacia complex in cystic fibrosis: critical gaps in diagnosis and therapy

Burkholderia cepacia complex (Bcc) is a bacterial group with 'natural' multi-antimicrobial resistance. This complex has generated epidemic outbreaks across the world. In people with cystic fibrosis (CF), Bcc can cause severe lung infections that lead to accelerated lung damage, which can be complicated by necrotizing pneumonia accompanied by high fevers, leucocytosis, and bacteraemia, which commonly causes fatal outcomes. Specifically, infection by Burkholderia cenocepacia is considered an exclusion criterion for lung transplantation. The species of Bcc exhibit both genetic and phenotypic hypervariability that complicate their accurate microbiological identification. Automated methods such as MALDI-TOF can err in the determination of species. Their slow growth even in selective agars and the absence of international consensuses on the optimal conditions for their isolation make early diagnosis a difficult challenge to overcome. The absence of correlations between antibiograms and clinical results has resulted in the absence of standardized cut-off values of antimicrobial susceptibility, a fact that brings a latent risk since incorrect antibiotic therapy can induce the selection of more aggressive variants that worsen the clinical picture of the host, added to the absence of a clear therapeutic guide for the eradication of pulmonary infections by Bcc in patients with CF, resulting in frequently ineffective treatments. There is an urgent need to standardize methods and diagnostic tools that would allow an early and accurate diagnosis, as well as to perform clinical studies of the effectiveness of available antibiotics to eradicate Bcc infections, which would allow us to establish standardized therapeutic schemes for Bcc-infected patients.

Improved Blue Carba test and Carba NP test for detection and classification of major Class A and B carbapenemases, including dual producers, among Gram-negative bacilli

Prompt and precise identification of carbapenemase-producing organisms is crucial for guiding clinical antibiotic treatments and limiting transmission. Here, we propose modifying the Blue Carba test (BCT) and Carba NP-direct (CNPd) to identify molecular carbapenemase classes, including dual carbapenemase strains, by adding specific Class A and Class B inhibitors. We tested 171 carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative bacilli strains-21 in Class A (KPC, NMC, SME), 58 in Class B (IMP, VIM, NDM, SPM), and 92 with dual carbapenemase production (KPC+NDM, KPC+IMP, KPC+VIM), all previously positive with BCT or CNPd. We also included 13 carbapenemase non-producers. β-lactamases were previously characterized by PCR. The improved BCT/CNPd methods detect imipenem hydrolysis from an imipenem-cilastatin solution, using pH indicators and Class A (avibactam) and/or Class B (EDTA) inhibitors. Results were interpreted visually based on color changes. CNPd achieved 99.4% sensitivity and 100% specificity in categorizing carbapenemases, while BCT had 91.8% sensitivity and 100% specificity. Performance varied by carbapenemase classes: both tests classified all Class A-producing strains. For Class B, the CNP test identified 57/58 strains (98.3%), whereas the BCT test, 45/58 strains (77.6%), with non-fermenters posing the greatest detection challenge. For Classes A plus B dual producers, both tests performed exceptionally well, with only one indeterminate strain for the BCT. The statistical comparison showed both methods had similar times to a positive result, with differences based on the carbapenemase class or bacterial group involved. This improved assay rapidly distinguishes major Class A or Class B carbapenemase producers among Gram-negative bacilli, including dual-class combinations, in less than 2 hours.

IMPORTANCE

Rapid and accurate identification of carbapenemase-producing organisms is of vital importance in guiding appropriate clinical antibiotic treatments and curbing their transmission. The emergence of negative bacilli carrying multiple carbapenemase combinations during and after the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic has posed a challenge to the conventional biochemical tests typically used to determine the specific carbapenemase type in the isolated strains. Several initiatives have aimed to enhance colorimetric methods, enabling them to independently identify the presence of Class A or Class B carbapenemases. Notably, no previous efforts have been made to distinguish both classes simultaneously. Additionally, these modifications have struggled to differentiate between carriers of multiple carbapenemases, a common occurrence in many Latin American countries. In this study, we introduced specific Class A and Class B carbapenemase inhibitors into the Blue Carba test (BCT) and Carba NP-direct (CNP) colorimetric assays to identify the type of carbapenemase, even in cases of multiple carbapenemase producers within these classes. These updated assays demonstrated exceptional sensitivity and specificity (≥ 90%) all within a rapid turnaround time of under 2 hours, typically completed in just 45 minutes. These in-house enhancements to the BCT and CNP assays present a rapid, straightforward, and cost-effective approach to determining the primary carbapenemase classes. They could serve as a viable alternative to molecular biology or immuno-chromatography techniques, acting as an initial diagnostic step in the process.

Identifying Novel Therapeutics for the Resistant Mutant "F533L" in PBP3 of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Using ML Techniques

Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) is a highly infectious and antibiotic-resistant bacterium, which causes acute and chronic nosocomial infections. P. aeruginosa exhibits multidrug resistance due to the emergence of resistant mutants. The bacterium takes advantage of intrinsic and acquired resistance mechanisms to resist almost every antibiotic. To overcome the drug-resistance problem, there is a need to develop effective drugs against antibiotic-resistant mutants. Therefore, in this study, we selected the F533L mutation in PBP3 (penicillin-binding protein 3) because of its important role in β-lactam recognition. To target this mutation, we screened 147 antibacterial compounds from PubChem through a machine-learning model developed based on the decision stump algorithm with 75.75% accuracy and filtered out 55 compounds. Subsequently, out of 55 compounds, 47 compounds were filtered based on their drug-like activity. These 47 compounds were subjected to virtual screening to obtain binding affinity compounds. The binding affinity range of all 47 compounds was -11.3 to -4.6 kcal mol-1. The top 10 compounds were examined according to their binding with the mutation point. A molecular dynamic simulation of the top 8 compounds was conducted to understand the stability of the compounds containing the mutated PBP3. Out of 8 compounds, 3 compounds, namely, macozinone, antibacterial agent 71, and antibacterial agent 123, showed good stability and were validated by RMSD, RMSF, and binding-free analysis. The findings of this study revealed promising antibacterial compounds against the F533L mutant PBP3. Furthermore, developments in these compounds may pave the way for novel therapeutic interventions.

Evolution of blaKPC Under the Pressure of Carbapenems and Ceftazidime/Avibactam in a Patient With Persistent Bacteremia Caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae

A 30-year-old Korean man with myelodysplastic syndrome admitted hospital due to undifferentiated fever and recurrent skin lesions. He received combination therapy with high doses of meropenem, tigecycline and amikacin, yielding carbapenem resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) harboring K. pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-2 from blood cultures on hospital day (HD) 23. Ceftazidime/avibactam was started at HD 37 and CRKP was eradicated from blood cultures after 5 days. However, ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant CRKP carrying KPC-44 emerged after 26 days of ceftazidime/avibactam treatment and then ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant, carbapenem-susceptible K. pneumoniae carrying KPC-135 was isolated on HD 65. The 3-D homology of KPC protein showed that hot spot changes in the omega loop could be attributed to ceftazidime/avibactam resistance and loss of carbapenem resistance. Whole genome sequencing of serial isolates supported that phenotypic variation was due to clonal evolution than clonal replacement. The treatment regimen was changed from CAZ/AVI to meropenem-based therapy (meropenem 1 g iv q 8 hours and amikacin 600 mg iv per day) starting with HD 72. CAZ/AVI-susceptible CRKP was presented again from blood cultures on HD 84, and the patient expired on HD 85. This is the first Korean report on the acquisition of ceftazidime/avibactam resistance through the emergence of blaKPC variants.

Susceptibility evaluation of novel beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations against carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae from bloodstream infections in hospitalized patients in Brazil

Novel beta-lactams/beta-lactamase inhibitors (BIBLI) combinations are commercially available and they have been used for treating carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) infections. Continuous surveillance of susceptibility profile and resistance mechanisms identification are necessary to monitor the evolution of resistance as these agents are used. The purpose of this study was to evaluate susceptibility rates to ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam in CRKP isolates from patients with bloodstream infection screened for a randomized clinical trial in Brazil. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined by gradient diffusion strip method for meropenem, ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam. Carbapenemase genes were detected by multiplex qPCR. KPC-producing isolates showing resistance to any BLBLI and NDM-producing isolates showing susceptibility to any BLBLI were further submitted to whole genome sequencing. From a total of 69 CRKP isolates, 39 were positive for blaKPC, 19 for blaNDM and 11 for blaKPC and blaNDM. KPC-producing isolates demonstrated susceptibility rates above 94% for all BLBLI. Two isolates with resistance to meropenem/vaborbactam showed a Gly and Asp duplication at OmpK36 protein and truncated ompK35 genes. All NDM-producing isolates, including KPC and NDM coproducers, demonstrated susceptibility rates for ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam of 0%, 9.1 to 21.1% and 9.1 to 26.3%, respectively. Five NDM-producing isolates that presented susceptibility to BLBLI also demonstrated alterations in porins. This study demonstrated that, although high susceptibility rates to the BLBLI were found, KPC-2 isolates can also demonstrate resistance due to porin mutations. Additionally, NDM-1 isolates can demonstrate susceptibility in vitro to the BLBLI.

Colistin: Lights and Shadows of an Older Antibiotic

The emergence of antimicrobial resistance represents a serious threat to public health and for infections due to multidrug-resistant (MDR) microorganisms, representing one of the most important causes of death worldwide. The renewal of old antimicrobials, such as colistin, has been proposed as a valuable therapeutic alternative to the emergence of the MDR microorganisms. Although colistin is well known to present several adverse toxic effects, its usage in clinical practice has been reconsidered due to its broad spectrum of activity against Gram-negative (GN) bacteria and its important role of "last resort" agent against MDR-GN. Despite the revolutionary perspective of treatment with this old antimicrobial molecule, many questions remain open regarding the emergence of novel phenotypic traits of resistance and the optimal usage of the colistin in clinical practice. In last years, several forward steps have been made in the understanding of the resistance determinants, clinical usage, and pharmacological dosage of this molecule; however, different points regarding the role of colistin in clinical practice and the optimal pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets are not yet well defined. In this review, we summarize the mode of action, the emerging resistance determinants, and its optimal administration in the treatment of infections that are difficult to treat due to MDR Gram-negative bacteria.

Complete Genome Sequence of a Klebsiella pneumoniae Strain Carrying Novel Variant blaKPC-203, Cross-Resistant to Ceftazidime/Avibactam and Cefiderocol, but Susceptible to Carbapenems, Isolated in Italy, 2023

BACKGROUND

Klebsiella pneumoniae is a concerning pathogen, responsible for hospital-associated outbreaks. Multi drug resistant (MDR) strains are especially hard to treat. We conducted whole-genome sequencing on a MDR K. pneumoniae strain in order to identify genomic features potentially linked to its phenotype.

METHODS

DNA sequencing was performed on the Illumina iSeq 100 platform. Genome assembly was carried out with SPAdes. The genome was annotated with RASTtk. Typing was performed with MLST and Kaptive. Antibiotic resistance genes were detected with AMRFinderPlus and Abricate, and further verified with BLAST.

RESULTS

The strain exhibited resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam and cefiderocol, but remained susceptible to carbapenems. The strain belonged to sequence type ST101, serotype O1:K17. The analysis of antibiotic resistance genes indicated that the strain carried a novel KPC variant, designated as KPC-203, featuring a EL deletion at amino acid position 166-167, within the Ω-loop, and a nine-amino-acid insertion (LAVYTRAPM) at position 259. Sequence alterations were found in porin genes ompK35 and ompK36. Unlike molecular testing, which was able to detect the KPC-203 variant, all phenotypic carbapenemase detection methods achieved negative results.

CONCLUSIONS

KPC-203, a novel KPC variant, showed a sequence modification in a cephalosporin resistance-associated hotspot. Interestingly, such alterations typically correlate with the restoration of carbapenem susceptibility. We hypothesize that KPC-203 likely led to resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam and cefiderocol, while maintaining susceptibility to carbapenems.

Synergistic Activity of Temocillin and Fosfomycin Combination against KPC-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae Clinical Isolates

Infections caused by KPC-producing K. pneumoniae continue to pose a significant clinical challenge due to their emerging resistance to new antimicrobials. We investigated the association between two drugs whose roles have been repurposed against multidrug-resistant bacteria: fosfomycin and temocillin. Temocillin exhibits unusual stability against KPC enzymes, while fosfomycin acts as a potent "synergizer". We conducted in vitro antimicrobial activity studies on 100 clinical isolates of KPC-producing K. pneumoniae using a combination of fosfomycin and temocillin. The results demonstrated synergistic activity in 91% of the isolates. Subsequently, we assessed the effect on Galleria mellonella larvae using five genetically different KPC-Kp isolates. The addition of fosfomycin to temocillin increased larvae survival from 73 to 97% (+Δ 32%; isolate 1), from 93 to 100% (+Δ 7%; isolate 2), from 63 to 86% (+Δ 36%; isolate 3), from 63 to 90% (+Δ 42%; isolate 4), and from 93 to 97% (+Δ 4%; isolate 10). Among the temocillin-resistant KPC-producing K. pneumoniae isolates (24 isolates), the addition of fosfomycin reduced temocillin MIC values below the resistance breakpoint in all isolates except one. Temocillin combined with fosfomycin emerges as a promising combination against KPC-producing K. pneumoniae, warranting further clinical evaluation.

First report of KPC variants conferring ceftazidime-avibactam resistance in Colombia: introducing KPC-197

Resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) due to Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) variants is increasing worldwide. We characterized two CZA-resistant clinical Klebsiella pneumoniae strains by antimicrobial susceptibility test, conjugation assays, and WGS. Isolates belonged to ST258 and ST45, and produced a KPC-31 and a novel variant KPC-197, respectively. The novel KPC variant presents a deletion of two amino acids on the Ω-loop (del_168-169_EL) and an insertion of two amino acids in position 274 (Ins_274_DS). Continued surveillance of KPC variants conferring CZA resistance in Colombia is warranted.

IMPORTANCE

Latin America and the Caribbean is an endemic region for carbapenemases. Increasingly high rates of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) have established ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) as an essential antimicrobial for the treatment of infections due to MDR Gram-negative pathogens. Although other countries in the region have reported the emergence of CZA-resistant KPC variants, this is the first description of such enzymes in Colombia. This finding warrants active surveillance, as dissemination of these variants could have devastating public health consequences.

Friends or foes? Novel antimicrobials tackling MDR/XDR Gram-negative bacteria: a systematic review

Gram-negative bacteria have been one of the most studied classes in the field of microbiology, especially in the context of globally alarming antimicrobial resistance levels to these pathogens over the course of the past decades. With high numbers of these microorganisms being described as multidrug-resistant (MDR), or even extended-drug-resistant (XDR) bacteria, specialists in the field have been struggling to keep up with higher prevalence of difficult-to-treat infections caused by such superbugs. The FDA approval of novel antimicrobials, such as cefiderocol (FDC), ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T), ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA), imipenem/relebactam (IMR), sulbactam/durlobactam (SUL-DUR) and phase 3 clinical trials' results of aztreonam/avibactam (ATM-AVI) has proven that, while all these substances provide encouraging efficacy rates, antibiotic resistance keeps up with the pace of drug development. Microorganisms have developed more extensive mechanisms of resistance in order to target the threat posed by these novel antimicrobials, thus equiring researchers to be on a constant lookout for other potential drug candidates and molecule development. However, these strategies require a proper understanding of bacterial resistance mechanisms to gain a comprehensive outlook on the issue. The present review aims to highlight these six antibiotic agents, which have brought hope to clinicians during the past decade, discussing general properties of these substances, as well as mechanisms and patterns of resistance, while also providing a short overview on further directions in the field.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#searchadvanced, Identifier CRD42024505832.

A review of the mechanisms that confer antibiotic resistance in pathotypes of E. coli

The dissemination of antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli poses a significant threat to public health worldwide. This review provides a comprehensive update on the diverse mechanisms employed by E. coli in developing resistance to antibiotics. We primarily focus on pathotypes of E. coli (e.g., uropathogenic E. coli) and investigate the genetic determinants and molecular pathways that confer resistance, shedding light on both well-characterized and recently discovered mechanisms. The most prevalent mechanism continues to be the acquisition of resistance genes through horizontal gene transfer, facilitated by mobile genetic elements such as plasmids and transposons. We discuss the role of extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) and carbapenemases in conferring resistance to β-lactam antibiotics, which remain vital in clinical practice. The review covers the key resistant mechanisms, including: 1) Efflux pumps and porin mutations that mediate resistance to a broad spectrum of antibiotics, including fluoroquinolones and aminoglycosides; 2) adaptive strategies employed by E. coli, including biofilm formation, persister cell formation, and the activation of stress response systems, to withstand antibiotic pressure; and 3) the role of regulatory systems in coordinating resistance mechanisms, providing insights into potential targets for therapeutic interventions. Understanding the intricate network of antibiotic resistance mechanisms in E. coli is crucial for the development of effective strategies to combat this growing public health crisis. By clarifying these mechanisms, we aim to pave the way for the design of innovative therapeutic approaches and the implementation of prudent antibiotic stewardship practices to preserve the efficacy of current antibiotics and ensure a sustainable future for healthcare.

In vitro activity of meropenem-vaborbactam plus aztreonam against metallo-β-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae

We evaluated the in vitro activity of meropenem-vaborbactam plus aztreonam (MEV-ATM) against 140 metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates. Among them, 25 isolates (17.9%) displayed minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) ≥ 8 µg/mL, while 112 (80.0%) had MIC ≤ 2 µg/mL. Genomic analysis and subsequent gene cloning experiments revealed OmpK36 134-135GD-insertion and increased carbapenemase gene (blaNDM-1 and blaOXA-48-like) copy numbers are the main factors responsible for MEV-ATM non-susceptibility. Notably, MEV-ATM is actively against aztreonam-avibactam-resistant mutants due to CMY-16 mutations.

A novel KPC-166 in ceftazidime/avibactam resistant ST307 Klebsiella pneumoniae causing an outbreak in intensive care COVID Unit, Italy

INTRODUCTION

Aim of the study was the molecular characterization of 21 ceftazidime/avibactam resistant (CZA-R) Klebsiella pneumoniae strains, collected in the period October 2021-March 2022 from an Intensive Care COVID Unit in a Northern Italian Hospital.

METHODS

After growth on selective/chromogenic culture media and susceptibility tests assessment, resistance genes content was ascertained for all the isolates by the HybriSpot 12 multiplexing, PCR and Whole-Genome Sequencing (WGS). Clonality was assessed by PFGE and MLST according to the Pasteur scheme. A SNPs-based phylogenetic tree was obtained comparing representative isolates and global genomes. The blaKPC gene horizontal transmission was evaluated by conjugation experiments. blaKPC-166 was cloned in a pCR2.1 vector and transformed in chemically competent TOP10 cells.

RESULTS

Sixteen inpatients resulted positive for colonization and/or infection by KPC-producing K. pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) strains. The 21 CZA-R KPC-Kp isolates obtained showed MDR phenotype; susceptibility to meropenem was always retained. All the CZA-R KPC-Kp presented a novel blaKPC variant, named blaKPC-166, showing a single nucleotide substitution (T811C) compared to the blaKPC-94; but related to blaKPC-2.

TWO DIFFERENT PULSOTYPES WERE DETECTED

A in 18/21 and B in 1/21 cases, two strains from the same patient being untypable by PFGE. Interestingly, the outbreak was sustained by the high-risk clone ST307, although the ST22, ST6342, ST6418 and ST6811 have also been identified and associated to KPC-166. Worryingly, blaKPC-166 could be transferred horizontally and, after cloning, it conferred resistance to CZA.

DISCUSSION

This novel variant confers CZA-resistance and carbapenems susceptibility restoration. As KPC-166 was found expressed by multiple Kp clones, greater efforts should be made to prevent the further dissemination of such strains in Italian clinical settings.

Antimicrobial and Diagnostic Stewardship of the Novel β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Inhibitors for Infections Due to Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales Species and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections are a major public health threat due to the limited therapeutic options available. The introduction of the new β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors (BL/BLIs) has, however, altered the treatment options for such pathogens. Thus, four new BL/BLI combinations-namely, ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, imipenem/relebactam, and ceftolozane/tazobactam-have been approved for infections attributed to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales species and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Nevertheless, although these antimicrobials are increasingly being used in place of other drugs such as polymyxins, their optimal clinical use is still challenging. Furthermore, there is evidence that resistance to these agents might be increasing, so urgent measures should be taken to ensure their continued effectiveness. Therefore, clinical laboratories play an important role in the judicious use of these new antimicrobial combinations by detecting and characterizing carbapenem resistance, resolving the presence and type of carbapenemase production, and accurately determining the minimum inhibitor concentrations (MICs) for BL/BLIs. These three targets must be met to ensure optimal BL/BLIs use and prevent unnecessary exposure that could lead to the development of resistance. At the same time, laboratories must ensure that results are interpreted in a timely manner to avoid delays in appropriate treatment that might be detrimental to patient safety. Thus, we herein present an overview of the indications and current applications of the new antimicrobial combinations and explore the diagnostic limitations regarding both carbapenem resistance detection and the interpretation of MIC results. Moreover, we suggest the use of alternative narrower-spectrum antibiotics based on susceptibility testing and present data regarding the effect of synergies between BL/BLIs and other antimicrobials. Finally, in order to address the absence of a standardized approach to using the novel BL/BLIs, we propose a diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm, which can be modified based on local epidemiological criteria. This framework could also be expanded to incorporate other new antimicrobials, such as cefiderocol, or currently unavailable BL/BLIs such as aztreonam/avibactam and cefepime/taniborbactam.

Activity of imipenem/relebactam and comparators against KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and imipenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa

PURPOSE

Relebactam is a novel β-lactamase inhibitor, which, when combined with imipenem/cilastatin, is active against both class A and class C β-lactamases. To evaluate in vitro antimicrobial activity of imipenem/relebactam against a collection of recent clinical isolates of carbapenem-non-susceptible P. aeruginosa and K. pneumoniae ST258 and ST512 KPC producers belonging to different lineages from hospitals in Southern Spain.

METHODS

Six hundred and seventy-eight isolates were tested: 265 K. pneumoniae (230 ST512/KPC-3 and 35 ST258/KPC-3) and 413 carbapenem-non-susceptible P. aeruginosa. Imipenem, piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime, cefepime, aztreonam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, meropenem, amikacin, ciprofloxacin, colistin, and ceftazidime/avibactam were used as comparators against P. aeruginosa. Against K. pneumoniae ceftazidime, cefepime, aztreonam, and ceftolozane/tazobactam were not tested, and tigecycline was studied instead. MICs were determined in duplicate by broth microdilution according to EUCAST guidelines.

RESULTS

Imipenem/relebactam displayed potent in vitro activity against both sequence types of KPC-3-producing K. pneumoniae. MIC50 and MIC90 values were 0.25 mg/L and 1 mg/L, respectively, with percent of susceptible isolates >97%. Only three K. pneumoniae ST512/KPC-3 isolates and one ST258/KPC-3 were resistant to imipenem/relebactam. Relebactam sensitized 98.5% of K. pneumoniae isolates resistant to imipenem. The activity of imipenem/relebactam against P. aeruginosa was moderate (susceptibility rate: 62.7%). Analysis of the acquired and mutational resistome of isolates with high levels of resistance to imipenem/relebactam has not shown a clear association between them.

CONCLUSION

Imipenem/relebactam showed excellent activity against K. pneumoniae KPC-3. The activity of imipenem/relebactam against imipenem-resistant P. aeruginosa was moderate.

Rapid Detection of Ceftazidime/Avibactam Susceptibility/Resistance in Enterobacterales by Rapid CAZ/AVI NP Test

We developed a novel culture-based test, the Rapid CAZ/AVI NP test, for rapid identification of ceftazidime/avibactam susceptibility/resistance in Enterobacterales. This test is based on glucose metabolization upon bacterial growth in the presence of a defined concentration of ceftazidime/avibactam (128/53 μg/mL). Bacterial growth is visually detectable by a red to yellow color change of red phenol, a pH indicator. A total of 101 well characterized enterobacterial isolates were used to evaluate the test performance. This test showed positive percent agreement of 100% and negative percent agreement of 98.5% with overall percent agreement of 99%, by comparison with the MIC gradient strip test (Etest) taken as the reference standard method. The Rapid CAZ/AVI NP test had only 1.5% major errors and 0% extremely major errors. This test is rapid (result within 2 hours 45 minutes), reliable, affordable, easily interpretable, and easy to implement in clinical microbiology laboratories without requiring any specific equipment.

Exploiting the Carboxylate-Binding Pocket of β-Lactamase Enzymes Using a Focused DNA-Encoded Chemical Library

β-Lactamase enzymes hydrolyze and thereby provide bacterial resistance to the important β-lactam class of antibiotics. The OXA-48 and NDM-1 β-lactamases cause resistance to the last-resort β-lactams, carbapenems, leading to a serious public health threat. Here, we utilized DNA-encoded chemical library (DECL) technology to discover novel β-lactamase inhibitors. We exploited the β-lactamase enzyme-substrate binding interactions and created a DECL targeting the carboxylate-binding pocket present in all β-lactamases. A library of 106 compounds, each containing a carboxylic acid or a tetrazole as an enzyme recognition element, was designed, constructed, and used to identify OXA-48 and NDM-1 inhibitors with micromolar to nanomolar potency. Further optimization led to NDM-1 inhibitors with increased potencies and biological activities. This work demonstrates that the carboxylate-binding pocket-targeting DECL, designed based on substrate binding information, aids in inhibitor identification and led to the discovery of novel non-β-lactam pharmacophores for the development of β-lactamase inhibitors for enzymes of different structural and mechanistic classes.

Functional features of KPC-109, a novel 270-loop KPC-3 mutant mediating resistance to avibactam-based β-lactamase inhibitor combinations and cefiderocol

OBJECTIVES

To investigate a ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA)-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (NE368), isolated from a patient exposed to CZA, expressing a novel K. pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-3 variant (KPC-109).

METHODS

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed by reference broth microdilution. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) analysis of NE368 was performed combining a short- and long-reads approach (Illumina and Oxford Nanopore Technologies). Functional characterization of KPC-109 was performed to investigate the impact of KPC-109 production on the β-lactam resistance phenotype of various Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae strains, including derivatives of K. pneumoniae with OmpK35 and OmpK36 porin alterations. Horizontal transfer of the KPC-109-encoding plasmid was investigated by conjugation and transformation experiments.

RESULTS

K. pneumoniae NE368 was isolated from a patient after repeated CZA exposure, and showed resistance to CZA, fluoroquinolones, piperacillin/tazobactam, expanded-spectrum cephalosporins, amikacin, carbapenems and cefiderocol. WGS revealed the presence of a large chimeric plasmid of original structure (pKPN-NE368), encoding a novel 270-loop mutated KPC-3 variant (KPC-109; ins_270_KYNKDD). KPC-109 production mediated resistance/decreased susceptibility to avibactam-based combinations (with ceftazidime, cefepime and aztreonam) and cefiderocol, with a trade-off on carbapenem resistance. However, in the presence of porin alterations commonly encountered in high-risk clonal lineages of K. pneumoniae, KPC-109 was also able to confer clinical-level resistance to carbapenems. Resistance of NE368 to cefiderocol was likely contributed by KPC-109 production acting in concert with a mutated EnvZ sensor kinase. The KPC-109-encoding plasmid did not appear to be conjugative.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings expand current knowledge about the diversity of emerging KPC enzyme variants with 270-loop alterations that can be encountered in the clinical setting.

Efficacy and safety of novel carbapenem-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations: imipenem-cilastatin/relebactam results from randomized controlled trials

Background

Gram-negative bacteria is a global public health problem. Treatment options include novel beta-lactamase inhibitors.

Objectives

The objective of this study was to collect information on the efficacy and safety of novel β-lactamase inhibitor combinations such as imipenem-cilastatin/relebactam (IMI/REL).

Methods

In order to comprehensively evaluate the clinical, microbiological, and adverse events outcomes, a meta-analysis was conducted on clinical trials comparing novel β-lactamase inhibitor combinations with existing comparator therapies.

Results

Four studies comprising 948 patients were included in the analysis. IMI/REL therapy demonstrated similar clinical responses to comparators across various treatment visits, including discontinuation of intravenously administered therapy visits [DCIV, RR = 1.00 (0.88, 1.12)], early follow-up visits [EFU, RR = 1.00 (0.89, 1.14)], late follow-up visits [LFU, RR = 1.00 (0.88, 1.13)]. Moreover, no significant difference in the microbiologic response of MITT patients was observed between IMI/REL and comparators across DCIV [RR = 0.99 (0.89, 1.11)], EFU [RR = 1.01 (0.95, 1.07)], and LFU visits [RR = 1.00 (90.94, 1.07)]. In terms of safety, therapy with IMI/REL and comparators exhibited similar risks of at least one adverse event (AE), drug-related AEs, and discontinuation due to AEs. The incidence of serious AEs (SAEs) was significantly lower in the IMI/REL group compared to the comparison groups. The predominant AEs were gastrointestinal disorders, with no significant difference observed between the IMI/REL group and comparators.

Conclusion

The clinical and microbiologic response to IMI/REL in the treatment of bacterial infection was comparable to that of the comparator. Furthermore, the incidence of AEs and the tolerability of IMI/REL were similar among the comparators. Based on these findings, IMI/REL can be considered as a viable alternative treatment option.

In Vitro Evaluation of Increasing Avibactam Concentrations on Ceftazidime Activity against Ceftazidime/Avibactam-Susceptible and Resistant KPC-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae Clinical Isolates

The novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (βL-βLICs) are one of the last-line resources available against multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacteria. Among βL-βLICs, ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ-AVI) demonstrated strong activity against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE). Avibactam was proven to restore bactericidal activity of ceftazidime, inhibiting both KPC and OXA-48-like β-lactamases. Despite this, emergence of CAZ-AVI-resistant strains in Enterobacterales has been reported. Herein, we evaluated the in vitro ceftazidime activity in the presence of increasing concentrations of avibactam by the broth microdilution method against CAZ-AVI-susceptible and resistant genome-characterized KPC-producing K. pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) clinical isolates. Strains expressing KPC and co-expressing KPC/OXA-181 carbapenemase were selected on the basis of the different phenotypic traits for novel βL-βLICs and cefiderocol. Notably, avibactam at 8 mg/L maintained the MIC of ceftazidime above the clinical breakpoint in 14 out of 15 (93%) KPC-Kp resistant to CAZ-AVI. A high concentration of avibactam (i.e., 64 mg/L) is required to observe a bactericidal activity of ceftazidime against 9 out of 15 (60%) CAZ-AVI-resistant isolates. In vitro evaluation showed that with the increase in the concentration of avibactam, ceftazidime showed high activity against CAZ-AVI-susceptible strains. High concentrations of avibactam in vivo are required for ceftazidime to be active against CAZ-AVI-resistant KPC-Kp.

Approaches to Testing Novel β-Lactam and β-Lactam Combination Agents in the Clinical Laboratory

The rapid emergence of multi-drug resistant Gram-negative pathogens has driven the introduction of novel β-lactam combination agents (BLCs) to the antibiotic market: ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, imipenem-relebactam, cefiderocol, and sulbactam-durlobactam. These agents are equipped with innovative mechanisms that confer broad Gram-negative activity, notably against certain challenging carbapenemases. While their introduction offers a beacon of hope, clinical microbiology laboratories must navigate the complexities of susceptibility testing for these agents due to their diverse activity profiles against specific β-lactamases and the possibility of acquired resistance mechanisms in some bacterial isolates. This review explores the complexities of these novel antimicrobial agents detailing the intricacies of their application, providing guidance on the nuances of susceptibility testing, interpretation, and result reporting in clinical microbiology laboratories.

Treatment and diagnosis of severe KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae infections: a perspective on what has changed over last decades

Antimicrobial resistance is a global health threat. Among Gram-negative bacteria, resistance to carbapenems, a class of β-lactam antibiotics, is usually a proxy for difficult-to-treat resistance, since carbapenem-resistant organisms are often resistant to many classes of antibiotics. Carbapenem resistance in the Gram-negative pathogen Klebsiella pneumoniae is mostly due to the production of carbapenemases, enzymes able to hydrolyze carbapenems, and K. pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-type enzymes are overall the most prevalent carbapenemases in K. pneumoniae. In the last decade, the management of severe infections due to KPC-producing K. pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) in humans has presented many peculiar challenges to clinicians worldwide. In this perspective, we discuss how the treatment of severe KPC-Kp infections has evolved over the last decades, guided by the accumulating evidence from clinical studies, and how recent advances in diagnostics have allowed to anticipate identification of KPC-Kp in infected patients.KEY MESSAGESIn the last decade, the management of severe infections due to KPC-Kp has presented many peculiar challenges to clinicians worldwideFollowing the introduction in clinical practice of novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations and novel β-lactams active against KPC-producing bacteria, the management of severe KPC-Kp infections has witnessed a remarkable evolutionTreatment of severe KPC-Kp infections is a highly dynamic process, in which the wise use of novel antimicrobials should be accompanied by a continuous refinement based on evolving clinical evidence and laboratory diagnostics.

In vitro activity of ceftazidime-avibactam against clinical isolates of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa from sub-Saharan Africa: ATLAS Global Surveillance Program 2017-2021

OBJECTIVES

To report the in vitro susceptibility of Enterobacterales (n = 3905) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 1,109) isolates, collected from patients in sub-Saharan Africa (four countries) in 2017-2021, to a panel of 10 antimicrobial agents with a focus on ceftazidime-avibactam activity against resistant phenotypes and β-lactamase carriers.

METHODS

MICs were determined by CLSI broth microdilution and interpreted using both 2022 CLSI and EUCAST breakpoints. β-lactamase genes were identified in select β-lactam-nonsusceptible isolate subsets using multiplex PCR assays.

RESULTS

Among Enterobacterales, 96.2% of all isolates were ceftazidime-avibactam-susceptible (MIC90, 0.5 µg/mL), including all serine carbapenemase-positive (n = 127), 99.6% of ESBL-positive, carbapenemase-negative (n = 730), 91.9% of multidrug resistant (MDR; n = 1817), and 42.7% of DTR (difficult-to-treat resistance; n = 171) isolates. Metallo-β-lactamase (MBL) genes were identified in most (n = 136; 91.2%) ceftazidime-avibactam-resistant isolates (3.5% of all Enterobacterales isolates). Ceftazidime-avibactam percent susceptible values ranged from 99.5% (Klebsiella species other than Klebsiella pneumoniae) to 92.5% (K. pneumoniae) for the various Enterobacterial taxa examined. Greater than 90% of Enterobacterales isolates from each country (Cameroon, Ivory Coast, Nigeria, South Africa) were ceftazidime-avibactam-susceptible. Among P. aeruginosa, 88.9% of all isolates were ceftazidime-avibactam-susceptible (MIC90, 16 µg/mL). Most (88.5%) MBL-negative, meropenem-resistant (n = 78), 68.1% of MDR (n = 385), and 19.2% of DTR isolates (n = 99) were ceftazidime-avibactam-susceptible. MBL genes were identified in 43.1% of ceftazidime-avibactam-resistant isolates (n = 53; 4.8% of all P. aeruginosa isolates). Country-specific ceftazidime-avibactam percent susceptible values for P. aeruginosa ranged from 94.1% (Cameroon) to 76.2% (Nigeria).

CONCLUSION

Reference in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility testing demonstrated that most recent Enterobacterales (96%) and P. aeruginosa (89%) clinical isolates from four sub-Saharan African countries were ceftazidime-avibactam susceptible.

Carriage of multidrug-resistant carbapenemase-producing gram-negative bacteria in patients admitted to NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde hospitals: Implications for treatment

BACKGROUND

Infections caused by gram-negative carbapenemase-producing organisms (CPO) have become a global phenomenon. Screening of patients for CPO that was carried out at 48-h intervals enables early detection of carriers for infection control purposes and planning therapy.

METHODS

We investigated the bacterial flora detected on screening, the enzymes that conferred resistance and the proportion of patients who developed bacteraemia with CPO and their therapy.

RESULTS

In all, 27 patients had a positive screen for CPO. A small but significant (7.5%) proportion of patients were not detected on initial screening. Escherichia coli and Klebsiella were predominant. New-Delhi metallo β-lactamase and oxacillin carbapenemases were the main enzymatic mechanisms of resistance. Four (14.8%) patients developed bacteraemia with CPO (30- and 90-day survival 100% and 75%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

A single negative screen does not rule out colonisation. A significant proportion of patients colonised with CPO develop bacteraemia. Vigilance is needed to prevent the nosocomial spread of CPO.

Meropenem/Vaborbactam: β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combination, the Future in Eradicating Multidrug Resistance

Due to the fact that there is a steadily increasing trend in the area of antimicrobial resistance in microorganisms, there is a need to look for new treatment alternatives. One of them is the search for new β-lactamase inhibitors and combining them with β-lactam antibiotics, with the aim of increasing the low-dose efficacy, as well as lowering the resistance potential of bacterial strains. This review presents the positive effect of meropenem in combination with a vaborbactam (MER-VAB). This latest antibiotic-inhibitor combination has found particular use in the treatment of infections with the etiology of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), Gram-negative bacteria, with a high degree of resistance to available antimicrobial drugs.

Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae outbreak with monoclonal spread: Evaluation of resistance genes and ceftazidime-avibactam susceptibility

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) susceptibility, carbapenemase genes, and clonal relationship in carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CrKp) isolates.

METHODS

A total of 28 non-repetitive CrKp isolates with positive carbapenemase production determined by the modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM), were included in the study. Identification of the isolates was performed with MALDI-TOF MS (VITEK-MS, bioMerieux, France). The automated system (VITEK-2, bioMerieux) and gradient diffusion test (Etest, bioMerieux) were used to determine antibiotic susceptibility. The mCIM was performed according to CLSI (2021) recommendations. CAZ-AVI susceptibility was carried out using the standard disc diffusion method. Results were evaluated according to EUCAST 2022 criteria. The blaOXA-48, blaNDM, blaKPC, blaIMP and blaVIM genes were investigated by multiplex PCR. The clonal relationship between isolates was determined by both AP-PCR and PFGE methods.

RESULTS

Of the total 28 isolates, 89.3% were susceptible to CAZ-AVI. blaOXA-48 gene was found in 85.7% of the isolates, blaOXA-48+blaNDM gene in 10.7%, and blaNDM gene in 3.6%. blaKPC, blaIMP and blaVIM genes were not detected. Three clusters with three different genotypes were determined by the PFGE method. The largest cluster was Genotype A (n:24), followed by Genotype B (n:3), and Genotype C (n:1). AP-PCR was highly compatible with PFGE. The isolates of Genotype A, mostly from the intensive care unit (ICU), were evaluated as outbreak strains with monoclonal dissemination.

CONCLUSIONS

OXA-48 remains the most frequently detected enzyme in CrKp strains in our country. The ceftazidime-avibactam susceptibility rate of 89.3% indicates that this antibiotic is still effective against CrKp isolates. The unnoticed outbreak detected in our study revealed the severity of intra-hospital cross-contamination affecting different wards, including the ICU. Therefore, in order to limit the spread of CrKp isolates, it is of great importance to implement strict infection control measures, and molecular surveillance programs, especially in the ICU.

Global Resistance of Imipenem/Relebactam against Gram-Negative Bacilli: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Relebactam, previously known as MK-7655, is currently being tested in combination with imipenem as a class A and class C β-lactamase inhibitor, including KPC from Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Objective

The objective of the current study was to evaluate the activity of imipenem/relebactam against gram-negative bacilli.

Methods

After applying exclusion and inclusion criteria, 72 articles with full texts that describe the prevalence of imipenem/relebactam resistance were chosen for the meta-analysis and systematic review. Articles published between January 2015 and February 2023 were surveyed. The systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Scopus.

Results

The pooled estimation of 282,621 sample isolates revealed that the prevalence rate of imipenem/relebactam resistance is roughly 14.6% (95% CI, 0.116%-0.182%).

Conclusions

The findings of this analysis show that imipenem/relebactam resistance is rare in the majority of developed countries. Given that relebactam has proven to restore the activity of imipenem against current clinical isolates, further research into imipenem/relebactam is necessary.

A review of current antibiotic resistance and promising antibiotics with novel modes of action to combat antibiotic resistance

The emergence and transmission of antibiotic resistance is a global public health crisis with significant burden on healthcare systems, resulting in high mortality and economic costs. In 2019, almost five million deaths were associated with drug-resistant infections, and if left unchecked, the global economy could lose $100 trillion by 2050. To effectively combat this crisis, it is essential for all countries to understand the current situation of antibiotic resistance. In this review, we examine the current driving factors leading to the crisis, impact of critical superbugs in three regions, and identify novel mechanisms of antibiotic resistance. It is crucial to monitor the phenotypic characteristics of drug-resistant pathogens and describe the mechanisms involved in preventing the emergence of cross-resistance to novel antimicrobials. Additionally, maintaining an active pipeline of new antibiotics is essential for fighting against diverse antibiotic-resistant pathogens. Developing antibacterial agents with novel mechanisms of action is a promising way to combat increasing antibiotic-resistant pathogens.

Exploring avibactam and relebactam inhibition of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase D179N variant: role of the Ω loop-held deacylation water

Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-2 (KPC-2) presents a clinical threat as this β-lactamase confers resistance to carbapenems. Recent variants of KPC-2 in clinical isolates contribute to concerning resistance phenotypes. Klebsiella pneumoniae expressing KPC-2 D179Y acquired resistance to the ceftazidime/avibactam combination affecting both the β-lactam and the β-lactamase inhibitor yet has lowered minimum inhibitory concentrations for all other β-lactams tested. Furthermore, Klebsiella pneumoniae expressing the KPC-2 D179N variant also manifested resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam yet retained its ability to confer resistance to carbapenems although significantly reduced. This structural study focuses on the inhibition of KPC-2 D179N by avibactam and relebactam and expands our previous analysis that examined ceftazidime resistance conferred by D179N and D179Y variants. Crystal structures of KPC-2 D179N soaked with avibactam and co-crystallized with relebactam were determined. The complex with avibactam reveals avibactam making several hydrogen bonds, including with the deacylation water held in place by Ω loop. These results could explain why the KPC-2 D179Y variant, which has a disordered Ω loop, has a decreased affinity for avibactam. The relebactam KPC-2 D179N complex revealed a new orientation of the diazabicyclooctane (DBO) intermediate with the scaffold piperidine ring rotated ~150° from the standard DBO orientation. The density shows relebactam to be desulfated and present as an imine-hydrolysis intermediate not previously observed. The tetrahedral imine moiety of relebactam interacts with the deacylation water. The rotated relebactam orientation and deacylation water interaction could potentially contribute to KPC-mediated DBO fragmentation. These results elucidate important differences that could aid in the design of novel β-lactamase inhibitors.

Ceftazidime/Avibactam and Meropenem/Vaborbactam for the Management of Enterobacterales Infections: A Narrative Review, Clinical Considerations, and Expert Opinion

This comprehensive review examines the unique attributes, distinctions, and clinical implications of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) and meropenem-vaborbactam (MEM-VAB) against difficult-to-treat Enterobacterales infections. Our manuscript explores these antibiotics' pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, antimicrobial activities, in vitro susceptibility testing, and clinical data. Moreover, it includes a meticulous examination of comparative clinical and microbiological studies, assessed and presented to provide clarity in making informed treatment choices for clinicians. Finally, we propose an expert opinion from a microbiological and a clinical point of view about their use in appropriate clinical settings. This is the first review aiming to provide healthcare professionals with valuable insights for making informed treatment decisions when combating carbapenem-resistant pathogens.

Evaluation of VITEK® 2 AST cards (AST-N376 and AST-N397) for susceptibility testing of challenging Gram negatives

Due to the increasing diffusion of MDR/XDR Gram-negatives it is necessary to offer reliable antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST), which also include new drugs. Here we evaluated the performances of the VITEK®2 AST-N376 and the AST-N397 cards. A collection of 180 clinical Gram-negative bacteria, producing relevant resistance mechanisms, were tested using VITEK 2 and MERLIN, in parallel. Discrepancies between the 2 systems were solved by the reference broth microdilution method. The workflow timing of the VITEK®2 system was also assessed. Overall, the VITEK®2 cards proved to be reliable in determining AST for the molecules evaluated, even if compliance with ISO acceptance criteria for accuracy assessment was not reached for some combinations and showed a short hands-on time for panels preparation. In conclusion, VITEK®2 is a valid system that ensures accurate results for AST of the molecules evaluated in this study and speeds up the workflow in the laboratory of diagnostic microbiology.

Antibiotic-Resistant ESKAPE Pathogens and COVID-19: The Pandemic beyond the Pandemic

Antibacterial resistance is a renewed public health plague in modern times, and the COVID-19 pandemic has rekindled this problem. Changes in antibiotic prescribing behavior, misinformation, financial hardship, environmental impact, and governance gaps have generally enhanced the misuse and improper access to antibiotics during the COVID-19 pandemic. These determinants, intersected with antibacterial resistance in the current pandemic, may amplify the potential for a future antibacterial resistance pandemic. The occurrence of infections with multidrug-resistant (MDR), extensively drug-resistant (XDR), difficult-to-treat drug-resistant (DTR), carbapenem-resistant (CR), and pan-drug-resistant (PDR) bacteria is still increasing. The aim of this review is to highlight the state of the art of antibacterial resistance worldwide, focusing on the most important pathogens, namely Enterobacterales, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Klebsiella pneumoniae, and their resistance to the most common antibiotics.

Current Understanding of Potential Linkages between Biocide Tolerance and Antibiotic Cross-Resistance

Antimicrobials (e.g., antibiotics and biocides) are invaluable chemicals used to control microbes in numerous contexts. Because of the simultaneous use of antibiotics and biocides, questions have arisen as to whether environments commonly treated with biocides (e.g., hospitals, food processing, wastewater, agriculture, etc.) could act as a reservoir for the development of antibiotic cross-resistance. Theoretically, cross-resistance could occur if the mechanism of bacterial tolerance to biocides also resulted in antibiotic resistance. On the other hand, biocides would likely present a higher evolutionary barrier to the development of resistance given the different modes of action between biocides and antibiotics and the broad-based physicochemical effects associated with most biocides. Published studies have shown that the induction of biocide tolerance in a laboratory can result in cross-resistance to some antibiotics, most commonly hypothesized to be due to efflux pump upregulation. However, testing of environmental isolates for biocide tolerance and antibiotic cross-resistance has yielded conflicting results, potentially due to the lack of standardized testing. In this review, we aim to describe the state of the science on the potential linkage between biocide tolerance and antibiotic cross-resistance. Questions still remain about whether the directed evolution of biocide tolerance and the associated antibiotic cross-resistance in a laboratory are or are not representative of real-world settings. Thus, research should continue to generate informative data to guide policies and preserve these tools' utility and availability.

Whole-Genome Sequencing and Molecular Analysis of Ceftazidime-Avibactam-Resistant KPC-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae from Intestinal Colonization in Elderly Patients

Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) is an active antibiotic combination of a β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor against carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales. Reports of resistance to CAZ-AVI other than metallo-β-lactamases have increased in recent years. The aim of this study was to analyze KPC-Klebsiella pneumoniae (KP) isolates resistant to CAZ-AVI from the intestinal carriage of hospitalized elderly patients in Italy, in February 2018-January 2020. Characterization of CAZ-AVI-resistant KP isolates, including MLST, resistome, virulome and plasmid content, was performed by WGS analysis. Out of six CAZ-AVI-resistant KP isolates, three belonged to ST101 and three to ST512; two isolates produced KPC-3 (both ST512), four had mutated KPC-3 (KPC-31, in ST101 and ST512, and KPC-46, both ST101). All CAZ-AVI-resistant KP isolates were multidrug-resistant and carried several resistance genes. The yersiniabactin ybt9 gene cluster was present in all ST101 isolates, while, in ST512 isolates, no virulence genes were detected. Several plasmids were detected: IncF was present in all isolates, as well as IncR and Col440 in ST101 and IncX3 in ST512 isolates. In conclusion, it is important to monitor the circulation of K. pneumoniae resistant to CAZ-AVI to prevent the spread of clones causing difficult-to-treat infections. The presence of mutated KPC-3 in high-risk K. pneumoniae clones resistant to CAZ-AVI in hospitalized patients deserves attention.

Clonal dissemination of Klebsiella pneumoniae resistant to cefiderocol, ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam and imipenem/relebactam co-producing KPC and OXA-181 carbapenemase

Objectives

Herein, we describe the epidemiology of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Also, we report the emergence of an outbreak of Klebsiella pneumoniae strains co-producing KPC and OXA-181 carbapenemase, resistant to novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors (βL-βLICs) and cefiderocol.

Methods

CPE were collected during a period of 3 years from 2019 to 2021. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing for novel βL-βLICs and cefiderocol was performed by MIC test strips and microdilution with iron-depleted broth. WGS was performed on 10 selected isolates using the Illumina platform, and resistome analysis was carried out by a web-based pipeline.

Results

Between January 2019 and December 2021, we collected 1430 carbapenemase producers from 957 patients with infections due to CPE. KPC was the most common carbapenemase, followed by VIM, OXA-48 and NDM. During 2021, we identified 78 K. pneumoniae co-producing KPC and OXA-181 carbapenemases in 60 patients, resistant to meropenem/vaborbactam and imipenem/relebactam. Resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam and cefiderocol was observed respectively in 7 and 8 out of the 10 sequenced K. pneumoniae. Genome analysis showed that all isolates were clonally related, shared a common porin and plasmid content, and carried blaOXA-181 and blaKPC carbapenemases. Specifically, 4 out of 10 isolates carried blaKPC-3, while 6 harboured mutated blaKPC. Of note, KPC producers resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam and harbouring mutated blaKPC exhibited higher MICs of cefiderocol (median MIC 16 mg/L, IQR 16-16) than strains harbouring WT blaKPC-3 (cefiderocol 9 mg/L, IQR 1.5-16).

Conclusions

Our results highlight the need for continuous monitoring of CPE to limit widespread MDR pathogens carrying multiple mechanisms conferring resistance to novel antimicrobial molecules.

Antimicrobial Peptides in Infectious Diseases and Beyond-A Narrative Review

Despite recent medical research and clinical practice developments, the development of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) significantly limits therapeutics for infectious diseases. Thus, novel treatments for infectious diseases, especially in this era of increasing AMR, are urgently needed. There is ongoing research on non-classical therapies for infectious diseases utilizing alternative antimicrobial mechanisms to fight pathogens, such as bacteriophages or antimicrobial peptides (AMPs). AMPs are evolutionarily conserved molecules naturally produced by several organisms, such as plants, insects, marine organisms, and mammals, aiming to protect the host by fighting pathogenic microorganisms. There is ongoing research regarding developing AMPs for clinical use in infectious diseases. Moreover, AMPs have several other non-medical applications in the food industry, such as preservatives, animal husbandry, plant protection, and aquaculture. This review focuses on AMPs, their origins, biology, structure, mechanisms of action, non-medical applications, and clinical applications in infectious diseases.

MALDI-TOF MS-Based KPC Direct Detection from Patients' Positive Blood Culture Bottles, Short-Term Cultures, and Colonies at the Hospital

Carbapenemase resistance in Enterobacterales is a global public health problem and rapid and effective methods for detecting these resistance mechanisms are needed urgently. Our aim was to evaluate the performance of a MALDI-TOF MS-based "Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase" (KPC) detection protocol from patients' positive blood cultures, short-term cultures, and colonies in healthcare settings. Bacterial identification and KPC detection were achieved after protein extraction with organic solvents and target spot loading with suitable organic matrices. The confirmation of KPC production was performed using susceptibility tests and bla_KPC amplification using PCR and sequencing. The KPC direct detection (KPC peak at approximately 28.681 Da) from patients' positive blood cultures, short-term cultures, and colonies, once bacterial identification was achieved, showed an overall sensibility and specificity of 100% (CI95: [95%, 100%] and CI95: [99%, 100%], respectively). The concordance between hospital routine bacterial identification protocol and identification using this new methodology from the same extract used for KPC detection was ≥92%. This study represents the pioneering effort to directly detect KPC using MALDI-TOF MS technology, conducted on patient-derived samples obtained from hospitals for validation purposes, in a multi-resistance global context that requires concrete actions to preserve the available therapeutic options and reduce the spread of antibiotic resistance markers.

Synergistic Activity of Cefiderocol in Combination with Piperacillin-Tazobactam, Fosfomycin, Ampicillin-Sulbactam, Imipenem-Relebactam and Ceftazidime-Avibactam against Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria

Limited treatment options are among the main reasons why antimicrobial resistance has become a leading major public health problem. In particular, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriales (CRE), Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii have been included by the World Health Organization (WHO) among the pathogens for which new therapeutic agents are needed. The combination of antibiotics represents an effective strategy to treat multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogen infections. In this context, the aim of this study is to evaluate the in vitro activity of cefiderocol (CFD) in combination with different antimicrobial molecules against a collection of well-characterized clinical strains, exhibiting different patterns of antimicrobial susceptibility. Clinical strains were genomically characterized using Illumina iSeq100 platform. Synergy analyses were performed by combining CFD with piperacillin-tazobactam (PIP-TAZ), fosfomycin (FOS), ampicillin-sulbactam (AMP-SULB), ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI), meropenem-vaborbactam (MER-VAB) and imipenem-relebactam (IMI-REL). Our results demonstrated the synergistic effect of CFD in combination with FOS and CAZ-AVI against CRE and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CR-Ab) clinical strains owing CFD-resistant profile, while the CFD and AMP-SULB combination was effective against CR-Pa strain displaying AMP-SULB-resistant profile. Moreover, the combination of CAZ-AVI/SULB showed synergistic activity in CAZ-AVI-resistant CRE strain. In conclusion, although further analyses are needed to confirm these results, our work showed the efficacy of CFD when used for synergistic formulations.

What to Do with the New Antibiotics?

Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria-related infections have become a real public health problem and have exposed the risk of a therapeutic impasse. In recent years, many new antibiotics have been introduced to enrich the therapeutic armamentarium. Among these new molecules, some are mainly of interest for the treatment of the multidrug-resistant infections associated with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ceftolozane/tazobactam and imipenem/relebactam); others are for carbapenem-resistant infections associated with Enterobacterales (ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam); and finally, there are others that are effective on the majority of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (cefiderocol). Most international guidelines recommend these new antibiotics in the treatment of microbiologically documented infections. However, given the significant morbidity and mortality of these infections, particularly in the case of inadequate therapy, it is important to consider the place of these antibiotics in probabilistic treatment. Knowledge of the risk factors for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (local ecology, prior colonization, failure of prior antibiotic therapy, and source of infection) seems necessary in order to optimize antibiotic prescriptions. In this review, we will assess these different antibiotics according to the epidemiological data.

Comparison of Broth Microdilution, Disk Diffusion and Strip Test Methods for Cefiderocol Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing on KPC-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae

The aim of this study was to compare the reference broth microdilution (BMD) method with the Disk Diffusion (DD) test and strip test against a collection of 75 well-characterized Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) clinical strains to assess cefiderocol (CFD) antimicrobial activity. Whole-genome sequencing was performed on KPC-Kp strains by Illumina iSeq100 platform. The Categorical Agreement (CA) between the BMD method and DD test was 92% (69/75) with a Major Error (ME) of 16.7% (6/36). Additionally, the CA between the BMD method and test strip was 90.7% (68/75) with a Very Major Error (VME) of 17.9% (7/39) and 82.7% (62/75) between the strip test and DD with a ME of 30.2%. KPC-Kp strains showing resistance to CFD were 27 out of 75 (36%) by three methods. Specifically, 51.9% (14/27) of KPC-Kp resistant to CFD harbored bla_KPC-3, while 48.1% (13/27) harbored mutated bla_KPC-3. Moreover, KPC-Kp strains carrying a mutated bla_KPC-3 gene exhibited high MIC values (p value < 0.001) compared to wild-type bla_KPC-3. In conclusion, the DD test resulted as a valid alternative to the BMD method to determine the in vitro susceptibility to CFD, while the strip test exhibited major limitations.

The primary pharmacology of ceftazidime/avibactam: resistance in vitro

This article reviews resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam as an aspect of its primary pharmacology, linked thematically with recent reviews of the basic in vitro and in vivo translational biology of the combination (J Antimicrob Chemother 2022; 77: 2321-40 and 2341-52). In Enterobacterales or Pseudomonas aeruginosa, single-step exposures to 8×  MIC of ceftazidime/avibactam yielded frequencies of resistance from <∼0.5 × 10-9 to 2-8 × 10-9, depending on the host strain and the β-lactamase harboured. β-Lactamase structural gene mutations mostly affected the avibactam binding site through changes in the Ω-loop: e.g. Asp179Tyr (D179Y) in KPC-2. Other mutations included ones proposed to reduce the permeability to ceftazidime and/or avibactam through changes in outer membrane structure, up-regulated efflux, or both. The existence, or otherwise, of cross-resistance between ceftazidime/avibactam and other antibacterial agents was also reviewed as a key element of the preclinical primary pharmacology of the new agent. Cross-resistance between ceftazidime/avibactam and other β-lactam-based antibacterial agents was caused by MBLs. Mechanism-based cross-resistance was not observed between ceftazidime/avibactam and fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides or colistin. A low level of general co-resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam was observed in MDR Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa. For example, among 2821 MDR Klebsiella spp., 3.4% were resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam, in contrast to 0.07% of 8177 non-MDR isolates. Much of this was caused by possession of MBLs. Among 1151 MDR, XDR and pandrug-resistant isolates of P. aeruginosa from the USA, 11.1% were resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam, in contrast to 3.0% of 7452 unselected isolates. In this case, the decreased proportion susceptible was not due to MBLs.

Colonization by ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae following therapy in critically ill patients

OBJECTIVES

Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI)-based treatments have been associated with the emergence of resistance in KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) isolates after antimicrobial exposure. Here, we evaluated the CAZ-AVI resistance development in KPC-Kp isolated from patients treated with CAZ-AVI-based therapy.

METHODS

We enrolled adult patients treated with CAZ-AVI-based regimens between January 2020 and January 2021. Carbapenemase-producing isolates collected from clinical samples and rectal swabs were evaluated for CAZ-AVI resistance development after antimicrobial exposure. KPC-Kp developing CAZ-AVI resistance and parental susceptible strains were genomically characterized. Whole genome sequencing was performed by using the Illumina iSeq100 platform and genomes were analyzed for antimicrobial-resistance genes, plasmid and porins sequences.

RESULTS

We enrolled 90 patients treated with CAZ-AVI-based therapy and 62.2% (56/90) of them were colonized by KPC-producers before CAZ-AVI-based treatment and 6.6% acquired colonization during therapy. Six (6.6%) patients developed infections because of resistant KPC-Kp after CAZ-AVI exposure and 3 (3.3%) of them developed CAZ-AVI resistance in the rectum. Development of resistance among KPC in the rectum occurred after 32 (IQR, 9-35) days of therapy and after 30 (IQR, 22-40) days in clinical specimens. Genetic analysis demonstrated that the development of CAZ-AVI resistance was associated with mutated bla_KPC-3 (bla_KPC-31, bla_KPC-53, bla_KPC-89, and bla_KPC-130) and phylogenetic analysis demonstrated a close genomic relationship between KCP-Kp collected from rectum and clinical samples of the same patient.

DISCUSSION

Antimicrobial exposure induce a higher incidence of CAZ-AVI resistance development in the blood and respiratory tract than in the rectum (6.7% vs. 3.3%) of CAZ-AVI-treated patients and genome analysis showed that resistance was associated with mutated bla_KPC-3 variants.

Genomic Characterization of KPC-31 and OXA-181 Klebsiella pneumoniae Resistant to New Generation of β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations

BACKGROUND

Carbapenem resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (cr-Kp) causes serious infections associated with a high mortality rate. The clinical efficacy of ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA), meropenem/vaborbactam (M/V), and imipenem/relebactam (I/R) against cr-Kp is challenged by the emergence of resistant strains, making the investigation and monitoring of the main resistance mechanisms crucial. In this study, we reported the genome characterization of a Klebsiella pneumoniae strain isolated from a critically ill patient and characterized by a multidrug resistant (MDR) profile, including resistance to CZA, M/V, and I/R.

METHODS

An antimicrobial susceptibility test (AST) was performed by an automated system and E-test and results were interpreted following the EUCAST guidelines. Genomic DNA was extracted using a genomic DNA extraction kit and it was sequenced using the Illumina Nova Seq 6000 platform. Final assembly was manually curated and carefully verified for detection of antimicrobial resistance genes, porins modifications, and virulence factors.

RESULTS

The K. pneumoniae isolate belonged to sequence type ST512 and harbored 23 resistance genes, conferring resistance to all antibiotic classes, including blaKPC-31 and blaOXA-181, leading to carbapenems resistance. The truncation of OmpK35 and mutation OmpK36GD were also observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The genomic characterization demonstrated the high resistant profile of new cr-Kp coharboring class A and D carbapenemases. The presence of KPC-31, as well as the detection of OXA-181 and porin modifications, further limit the therapeutic options, including the novel combinations of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor antibiotics in patients with severe pneumonia caused by cr-Kp.

Epidemiology and In Vitro Activity of Ceftazidime/Avibactam, Meropenem/Vaborbactam and Imipenem/Relebactam against KPC-Producing K. pneumoniae Collected from Bacteremic Patients, 2018 to 2020

The management of KPC-producing K. pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) in bloodstream infections (BSIs) represent a serious clinical challenge. In this study, the aim is to assess the incidence of resistance to novel β-lactams-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (βL-βLICs), such as ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI), meropenem-vaborbactam (MER-VAB) and imipenem-relebactam (IMI-REL), in KPC-Kp strains collected during a three-year period from patients with bacteremia. KPC-Kp strains resistant to βL-βLICs were selected for whole-genome sequencing. A total of 133 K. pneumoniae strains were isolated, and KPC-Kp strains were the most represented (87.2%). In 2018, resistance to CAZ-AVI and MER-VAB was 6.5% and 14.5%, respectively. In 2019, KPC-Kp resistance to CAZ-AVI and MER-VAB remained at low levels, with values of 12.9% and 3.2%, respectively. During 2020, CAZ-AVI resistance was detected in 2/23 of KPC-Kp strains (8.7%). IMI-REL was the most active βL-βLIC, inhibiting >98% of the isolates, while CAZ-AVI and MER-VAB inhibited 87−93% and 85−97% of the KPC producers, respectively. Correlations between genotypic traits and resistance to βL-βLICs showed that KPC-Kp strains resistant to CAZ-AVI harbored a mutation within the blaKPC-3 gene, while all KPC-Kp strains resistant to CAZ-AVI, MER-VAB and/or IMI-REL carried the blaKPC-3 gene. Moreover, genetic analysis of porin genes showed that 14/16 of KPC-Kp resistant isolates possessed a truncated OmpK35 and glycine (G) and aspartic acid (D) insertions at positions 134−135 within OmpK36, whereas 2/16 displayed truncated OmpK35 and OmpK36 porins. Novel βL-βLICs are promising agents against KPC-Kp infections; however, the emergence of resistance to these agents highlights the need for continuous surveillance and application of enhanced antimicrobial stewardship.

Nosocomial outbreak by NDM-1-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae highly resistant to cefiderocol, Florence, Italy, August 2021 to June 2022

A nosocomial outbreak by cefiderocol (FDC)-resistant NDM-1-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (NDM-Kp) occurred in a large tertiary care hospital from August 2021-June 2022 in Florence, Italy, an area where NDM-Kp strains have become endemic. Retrospective analysis of NDM-Kp from cases observed in January 2021-June 2022 revealed that 21/52 were FDC-resistant. The outbreak was mostly sustained by clonal expansion of a mutant with inactivated cirA siderophore receptor gene, which exhibited high-level resistance to FDC (MIC ≥ 32 mg/L) and spread independently of FDC exposure.

Genome characterization of a Klebsiella pneumoniae co-producing OXA-181 and KPC-121 resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, imipenem/relebactam and cefiderocol isolated from a critically ill patient

OBJECTIVES

Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) represent a public health concern. The limited antimicrobial options against CPE have led to the development of novel antimicrobial molecules. In the present study, we characterized the genetic determinants associated with the resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ-AVI), meropenem/vaborbactam (MER-VAB), imipenem/relebactam (IMI-REL) and cefiderocol (CFD) in a carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae strain isolated from a critically ill patient.

METHODS

Genomic DNA was sequenced using Illumina iSeq 100 and Minion Oxford Nanopore platforms. Assemblies were performed with a de novo approach using short-read, hybrid and long-lead assembly approaches. Final assembly was manually curated and carefully verified. Circular elements were screened for antimicrobial-resistance genes, porins, virulence factors and prophage regions.

RESULTS

KPC-Kp (KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae) BO743 was resistant to all novel β-lactams including CAZ-AVI, MER-VAB, IMI-REL and CFD. The genome of strain BO743 is composed of a single chromosome of 5 347 606 bp and three circular plasmids of 363 634 bp (pBO743-363Kb), 120 290 bp (pBO743-120Kb) and 54 339 bp (pBO743-54Kb). Sequence analysis demonstrated that KPC-Kp BO743 co-harboured blaOXA-181 and novel blaKPC-121 located, respectively, on the pBO743-54Kb and pBO743-120Kb plasmids. KPC-121 differed by a serine insertion at position 181 than KPC-3.

CONCLUSION

The description of the genome of KPC-Kp cross-resistant to novel βL-βLICs and cefiderocol reveals the presence of numerous antimicrobial resistance genes including blaOXA-181 and novel variant blaKPC-121. The characterization of this multidrug-resistant phenotype provides evidence that needs further attention and monitoring of such MDR clinical isolates.