Slump in Hospital Admissions for Stroke, a Fact of an Uncertain Nature That Requires Explanation

Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Prehospital Emergency Care for Adults with Stroke and Transient Ischaemic Attack: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

COVID-19 has challenged global health care systems and resulted in prehospital delays for time-sensitive emergencies, like stroke and transient ischemic attacks (TIA). However, there are conflicting international reports on the level of effect of the pandemic on ambulance response intervals and emergency call volumes for these conditions.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to synthesize the international evidence on the effect of COVID-19 on ambulance response intervals and emergency call volume for suspected stroke and TIA.

METHODS

Following a published protocol, we conducted a systematic search of six databases through May 31, 2022. We re-ran this search on April 14, 2023, to check for any new papers. We considered for inclusion peer-reviewed quantitative studies comparing prehospital emergency care for adults with suspected stroke/TIA before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Two authors screened title/abstract and full text articles. One author carried out data extraction, with a random selection of articles being checked by another author. We calculated overall pooled estimates of ambulance intervals (activation, response, patient care, and total prehospital intervals) and stroke/TIA emergency call volume. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses included location and stroke/TIA diagnosis. Two authors assessed study quality using the appropriate Joanna Briggs Institute tool. We worked with patient and public involvement contributors and clinical and policy stakeholders throughout the review.

RESULTS

Of 4,083 studies identified, 52 unique articles met the inclusion criteria. Mean response interval (-1.29 min [-2.19 to -0.38]) and mean total prehospital interval (-6.42 min [-10.60 to -2.25]) were shorter in the pre-COVID-19 period, compared to the COVID-19 period. Furthermore, there was a higher incidence rate of emergency call volume for suspected stroke/TIA per day pre-COVID-19 compared with the COVID-19 period (log IRR = 0.17 [0.02 to 0.33]). Ambulance response interval definitions and terminology varied between regions and countries.

CONCLUSIONS

Our review indicates that prehospital delays for suspected stroke/TIA increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. Furthermore, emergency call volume for suspected stroke/TIA decreased during this period. In order to minimize delays in future pandemics or other health care emergencies future research may involve understanding the potential reasons for these delays.

Association of the COVID-19 pandemic on stroke admissions and treatment globally: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted insufficiencies and gaps within healthcare systems globally. In most countries, including high-income countries, healthcare facilities were over-run and occupied with too few resources beyond capacity. We carried out a systematic review with a primary aim to identify the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on the presentation and treatment of stroke globally in populations≥65 years of age.

DESIGN

A systematic review was completed. In total, 38 papers were included following full-text screening.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, MEDLINE and Embase.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Eligible studies included observational and real-world evidence publications with a population who have experienced stroke treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic. Exclusion criteria included studies comparing the effect of the COVID-19 infection on stroke treatment and outcomes.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Primary outcome measures extracted were the number of admissions, treatment times and patient outcome. Secondary outcomes were severity on admission, population risk factors and destination on discharge. No meta-analysis was performed.

RESULTS

This review demonstrated that 84% of studies reported decreased admissions rates during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, among those admitted, on average, had higher severity of stroke. Additionally, in-hospital stroke treatment pathways were affected by the implementation of COVID-19 protocols, which resulted in increased treatment times in 60% of studies and increased in-hospital mortality in 82% of studies by 100% on average. The prevalence of stroke subtype (ischaemic or haemorrhagic) and primary treatment methods (thrombectomy or thrombolysis) did not vary due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

CONCLUSIONS

During the COVID-19 pandemic, many populations hesitated to seek medical attention, decreasing hospital admissions for less severe strokes and increasing hospitalisation of more severe cases and mortality. The effect of the pandemic on society and healthcare systems needs to be addressed to improve stroke treatment pathways and prepare for potential future epidemics.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021248564.

Emergency hospital admissions, prognosis, and population mortality in Norway during the first wave of the Covid-19 epidemic

Background:

During the first wave of the Covid-19 epidemic, a national lockdown was established in Norway, and inhabitants were asked to contact healthcare only if absolutely necessary. We investigated hospital admissions and mortality due to non-Covid-19 disease during the lockdown compared to previous years.

Methods:

We compared the number of emergency admissions and in-hospital fatality for diagnoses probably unaffected (acute myocardial infarction, acute abdominal conditions, cerebrovascular diseases) and affected by the lockdown (infections, injuries) in the South-Eastern Health Region of Norway during weeks 12–22, 2020, compared to the mean of the same period in the years 2017–2019. We also compared population mortality March–May 2020, to the mean of the same period in years 2017–2019.

Results:

A total of 280,043 emergency admissions were observed; 20,911 admissions probably unaffected, and 30,905 admissions probably affected by the lockdown. Admissions due to diagnoses probably unaffected was reduced by 12% (95% confidence interval (CI) 9–15%), compared to 2017–2019. Admissions for diagnoses probably affected was reduced by 30% (95% CI 28–32%). There was a 34% reduction in in-hospital fatality due to acute myocardial infarction (95% CI 4–56%), 19% due to infections (95% CI 1–33%), and no change for the other diagnoses, compared to 2017–2019. The risk of in-hospital mortality to total mortality was lower for acute myocardial infarction (relative risk 0.85, 95% CI 0.73–0.99) and injuries (relative risk 0.83, 95% CI 0.70–0.98).

Conclusions:

Even though fewer patients were admitted to hospital, there was no increase in in-hospital fatality or population mortality, indicating that those who were most in need still received adequate care.

Trends in Stroke Presentations before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Meta-Analysis

Background and Purpose There are reports of decline in the rates of acute emergency presentations during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic including stroke. We performed a meta-analysis of the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on rates of stroke presentations and on rates of reperfusion therapy.Methods Following the Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines, we systematically searched the literature for studies reporting changes in stroke presentations and treatment rates before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Aggregated data were pooled using meta-analysis with random-effect models.Results We identified 37 observational studies (n=375,657). Pooled analysis showed decline in rates of all strokes (26.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 22.4 to 29.7) and its subtypes; ischemic (25.3%; 95% CI, 21.0 to 30.0), hemorrhagic (27.6%; 95% CI, 20.4 to 35.5), transient ischemic attacks (41.9%; 95% CI, 34.8 to 49.3), and stroke mimics (45.6%; 95% CI, 33.5 to 58.0) during months of pandemic compared with the pre-pandemic period. The decline was most evident for mild symptoms (40% mild vs. 25%–29% moderate/severe). Although rates of intravenous thrombolytic (IVT) and endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) decreased during pandemic, the likelihood of being treated with IVT and EVT did not differ between the two periods, both in primary and in comprehensive stroke centers (odds ratio [OR], 1.08; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.24 and OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.09, respectively).Conclusions Rates of all strokes types decreased significantly during pandemic. It is of paramount importance that general population should be educated to seek medical care immediately for stroke-like symptoms during COVID-19 pandemic. Whether delay in initiation of secondary prevention would affect eventual stroke outcomes in the long run needs further study.

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on haemorrhagic stroke admissions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

COVID-19 pandemic, a global health crisis, is disrupting the present medical environment. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on stroke hospitalisations, especially haemorrhagic stroke.

METHODS

The EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, Elsevier, Medline, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar electronic databases were searched for all relevant studies. Two researchers independently screened the studies, extracted data and assessed the quality of the included studies. Odds ratio (OR), total events, OR and 95% CI were considered as the effect size. A fixed-effects model was used to pool the study-specific estimate. The present study was performed by using Review Manager (V.5.3.0) software. We assessed the risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

RESULTS

A total of 17 studies with 14 445 cases were included. Overall, the number of stroke admissions is lower in the pandemic period versus the control period (6252 vs 8193). The difference of haemorrhagic stroke is significant, with 1233 of 6252 cases in the pandemic group and 1621 of 8193 cases in the control group. Intracerebral haemorrhage is present in 461 of 1948 cases in the pandemic group and 618 of 2734 cases in the control group. As for subarachnoid haemorrhage, the difference between the two groups is significant, with 70 of 985 cases in the pandemic group and 202 of 1493 cases in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of stroke admissions is lower in the pandemic period compared with the control period. There is a higher rate of haemorrhagic stroke in the pandemic period. Subgroup analysis identifies a significant increase in the occurrence of intracerebral haemorrhage in the pandemic period. Due to limited data and the impact of a single article, the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on subarachnoid haemorrhage is unclear.

"But it's a nice compromise" - Qualitative multi-centre study of barriers and facilitators to acute telestroke cooperation in a regional stroke network

BACKGROUND

Telemedical services can be used to complement on-site services when demand for specialists exceeds supply or when specialists are not evenly distributed across health systems. Using stroke as an example, this study aimed to explore how patients and staff experience telestroke cooperation in a stroke network in Germany.

METHODS

We conducted a qualitative multi-method and multi-centre study combining 32 non-participant observations at one hub and four spoke hospitals with 26 semi-structured interviews with hub and spoke staff as well as stroke patients and relatives. Observation protocols and interview transcripts were analysed to identify barriers and facilitators to telestroke cooperation from the perspectives of staff, patients and relatives.

RESULTS

In terms of barriers to telestroke cooperation, we found technological problems, providing the treatment for one patient from two sites, competing priorities between telestroke and in-house duties in the spoke hospitals, as well as difficulties in participating in the teleneurological examination via a videoconferencing system for older and disabled patients. In terms of facilitators, we found an overall very positive perception of telestroke provision by patients, good professional relationships within the network, and sharing of neurological expertise to be experienced as helpful for telestroke cooperation.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend better integration of telemedical services into the care pathway, fostering relationships within the network, improved technological support and resources, and more emphasis within networks, in public awareness efforts as well as in academia on the evaluation of telemedical services from the perspectives of patients and relatives, especially older patients and patients with disabilities.