Prognostic Markers in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Treated with Nivolumab

Radiomic biomarkers for platinum-refractory head and neck cancer in the era of immunotherapy

OBJECTIVE

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are recommended as the first-line therapy for platinum-refractory head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), a disease with a poor prognosis. However, biomarkers in this situation are rare. The objective was to identify radiomic features-associated biomarkers to guide the prognosis and treatment opinions in the era of ICI.

METHODS

A total of 31 platinum-refractory HNSCC patients were retrospectively enrolled. Of these, 65.5% (20/31) received ICI-based therapy and 35.5% (11/31) did not. Radiomic features of the primary site at the onset of recurrent metastatic (R/M) status were extracted. Prognostic and predictive radiomic biomarkers were analysed.

RESULTS

The median overall survival from R/M status (R/M OS) was 9.6 months. Grey-level co-occurrence matrix-associated texture features were the most important in identifying the patients with or without 9-month R/M death. A radiomic risk-stratification model was established and equally separated the patients into high-, intermittent- and lower-risk groups (1-year R/M death rate, 100.0% vs. 70.8% vs. 27.1%, p = 0.001). Short-run high grey-level emphasis (SRHGE) was more suitable than programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in selecting whether patients received ICI-based therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiomic features were effective prognostic and predictive biomarkers. Future studies are warranted.

Clinical, genomic and immune microenvironmental determinants of nivolumab response in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Background

In view of improving biomarkers predicting the efficacy of immunotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC), this multicenter retrospective study aimed to identify clinical, tumor microenvironmental, and genomic factors that are related to therapeutic response to the anti- Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) antibody, nivolumab, in patients with R/M HNSCC.

Methods

The study compared 53 responders and 47 non-responders, analyzing formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples using 14-marker multiplex immunohistochemistry and targeted gene sequencing.

Results

Of 100 patients included, responders had significantly lower smoking and alcohol index, higher incidence of immune related adverse events, and higher PD-1 ligand (PD-L1) expression in immune cells as well as PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) than non-responders. The frequency of natural killer cells was associated with nivolumab response in patients with prior cetuximab use, but not in cetuximab-naïve status. Age-stratified analysis showed nivolumab response was linked to high CPS and lymphoid-inflamed profiles in patients aged ≥ 65. In contrast, lower NLR in peripheral blood counts was associated with response in patients aged < 65. Notably, TP53 mutation-positive group had lower CPS and T cell densities, suggesting an immune-excluded microenvironment. Patients with altered tumor suppressor gene pathways, including TP53, CDKN2A, and SMAD4 mutations, had lower CPS, higher smoking index, and were associated with poor responses.

Conclusion

Nivolumab treatment efficacy in HNSCC is influenced by a combination of clinical factors, age, prior treatment, immune environmental characteristics, and gene mutation profiles.

Serum Albumin as an Independent Predictor of Long-Term Survival in Patients with Recurrent and Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated with Nivolumab

Background: Nivolumab has been shown to improve the overall survival (OS) of patients with recurrent and metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC). However, there is a need to identify factors associated with long-term survival (beyond 2 years) in these patients. This study investigated the relationship between pretreatment factors and long-term survival in patients with R/M HNSCC treated with nivolumab. Methods: Forty-nine patients with R/M HNSCC who were treated with nivolumab were retrospectively reviewed. Baseline characteristics, clinical data, and survival outcomes were evaluated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with long-term survival (OS ≥ 2 years). Results: The median OS in the overall cohort was 11.0 months, and the 2-year survival rate was 34.7%. Long-term survivors (OS ≥ 2 years) had significantly higher proportions of patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) scores of 0 or 1, serum albumin levels ≥ 3.5 g/dL, and neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio (NER) < 32.0 compared to non-long-term survivors. On multivariate analysis, serum albumin levels ≥ 3.5 g/dL, in addition to ECOG-PS score of 0 or 1, were independent predictors of long-term survival. Conclusions: Pretreatment serum albumin levels may be useful for predicting long-term survival in R/M HNSCC patients treated with nivolumab.

Multicenter retrospective study of nivolumab for recurrent/metastatic oral squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

Immunotherapy with nivolumab for patients with recurrent/metastatic oral squamous cell carcinoma has not been evaluated. Here, we aimed to examine the efficacy, safety, and prognostic factors of nivolumab in these patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This multicenter retrospective observational study involved patients who received nivolumab between April 2017 and June 2019. The patient characteristics were evaluated for association with progression-free and overall survival. Progression-free and overall survival rates were calculated; parameters that were significant in the univariate analysis were used as explanatory variables. Independent factors for progression-free and overall survival were identified using multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Totally, 143 patients were included. The overall response and disease control rates were 27.3% and 46.2%, respectively. The median, 1- and 2-year progression-free survival rates were 2.7 months, 25.4%, and 19.2%, respectively; those for overall survival were 11.2 months, 47.3%, and 33.6%, respectively. The independent factors affecting progression-free survival were performance status and immune-related adverse event occurrence, whereas those affecting overall survival were performance status, target disease, and number of previous lines of systemic cancer therapy. Eight patients reported grade ≥3 immune-related adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Nivolumab was effective for recurrent/metastatic oral squamous cell carcinoma treatment and was well tolerated by patients.

THE PROGNOSTIC ROLE OF PRE-TREATMENT PLATELET-TO-LYMPHOCYTE RATIO IN HEAD AND NECK SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA: META-ANALYSIS AND TRIAL SEQUENTIAL ANALYSIS

BACKGROUND

Evidence suggests that inflammation contributes to tumor development, from onset to progression and metastasis. Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) is a composite parameter that provides information from two distinct cellular elements, platelets, and lymphocytes. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the prognostic role of the PLR, in terms of overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and progression-free survival (PFS), in patients with primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated with surgery followed or not by adjuvant therapies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This systematic review was performed according to the guidelines reported in the Cochrane Handbook and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. Meta-analysis of OS and DFS was performed using the inverse of variance test. Random-effect models were used on the basis of high heterogeneity. Risk of bias assessment, quality of evidence within studies (GRADE) and trial sequential analysis (TSA) were also performed.

RESULTS

The analysis revealed that a higher value of pretreatment PLR correlates with a statistically significant decrease of OS (HR, 1.85; 95% CI: [1.23, 2.80]; P < .00001), confirmed by TSA. The meta-analysis reports an association between high PLR and DFS (HR,1.46; 95% CI: [1.03, 2.06]; P = .003); but TSA suggests that it his should be considered as a false positive. Further studies are needed to validate the efficacy of PLR in predicting CSS and PFS outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Pretreatment PLR is an independent prognostic factor for OS in HNSCC.

Pembrolizumab versus methotrexate, docetaxel, or cetuximab in recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (KEYNOTE-040): Subgroup analysis by pattern of disease recurrence

BACKGROUND

In the phase 3 KEYNOTE-040 study, pembrolizumab prolonged OS versus chemotherapy in previously treated recurrent or metastatic (R/M) HNSCC. We present a post hoc subgroup analysis by disease recurrence pattern: recurrent-only, recurrent and metastatic (recurrent-metastatic), and metastatic-only HNSCC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients had HNSCC that progressed during or after platinum-containing treatment for R/M disease or had recurrence or progression within 3-6 months of previous platinum-containing definitive therapy for locally advanced disease. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W or investigator's choice of standards of care (SOC): methotrexate, docetaxel, or cetuximab. Outcomes included OS, PFS, ORR, and DOR. The data cutoff was May 15, 2017.

RESULTS

There were 125 patients (pembrolizumab, 53; SOC, 72) in the recurrent-only subgroup, 204 in the recurrent-metastatic subgroup (pembrolizumab, 108; SOC, 96), and 166 in the metastatic-only subgroup (pembrolizumab, 86; SOC, 80). The hazard ratio (95% CI) for death for pembrolizumab versus SOC was 0.83 (0.55-1.25) in the recurrent-only, 0.78 (0.58-1.06) in the recurrent-metastatic, and 0.74 (0.52-1.05) in the metastatic-only subgroups. PFS was similar between treatment arms in all subgroups. ORR was 22.6% for pembrolizumab versus 16.7% for SOC in the recurrent-only, 10.2% versus 6.3% in the recurrent-metastatic, and 15.1% versus 8.8% in the metastatic-only subgroups. DOR was numerically longer with pembrolizumab in all subgroups.

CONCLUSION

Pembrolizumab provided numerically longer OS and durable responses in all subgroups compared with SOC, suggesting that patients with previously treated R/M HNSCC benefit from pembrolizumab regardless of recurrence pattern.

Elevated eosinophils proportion as predictor of immune-related adverse events after ipilimumab and nivolumab treatment of advanced and metastatic renal cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

Ipilimumab and nivolumab treatment against advanced and metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) causes severe and lethal immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Predicting irAEs might improve clinical outcomes, however no practical biomarkers exist. This study examined whether eosinophils could be effective biomarkers for ≥grade 2 irAEs in RCC.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 75 patients with RCC treated with ipilimumab and nivolumab between August 2018 and March 2021 in a multicenter study. Eosinophils were examined before and 2 weeks after treatment, and immediately after irAEs development. The optimal cut-off value for ≥grade 2 irAEs was determined by a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Univariate and multivariate analyses were undertaken to identify predictors of ≥grade 2 irAEs.

RESULTS

Two weeks after treatment, eosinophils were significantly upregulated in patients who had experienced ≥grade 2 irAEs than in those who had not experienced irAEs (mean, 5.7% vs. 3.2%; p < 0.05). The optimal cut-off value for eosinophils against ≥grade 2 irAEs was 3.0% (area under the curve = 0.69). In multivariate analyses, an eosinophil level ≥ 3.0% was a risk factor for ≥grade 2 irAEs (odds ratio 4.18, 95% confidence interval 1.16-15.1). The eosinophil level 2 weeks after treatment was upregulated by the onset of any type of irAEs including endocrine, gastrointestinal, pulmonary and skin disorders.

CONCLUSIONS

An increased eosinophil level 2 weeks after treatment might be an effective biomarker for ≥grade 2 irAEs in patients with RCC treated with ipilimumab and nivolumab.

Site of distant metastasis affects the prognosis with recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with Nivolumab

BACKGROUND

Nivolumab is approved for the treatment of recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC). However, the influence of the site of distant metastasis on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor in R/M HNSCC remains unclear. We investigated the prognosis of R/M HNSCC patients treated with nivolumab, focusing on the site of distant metastasis.

METHODS

We reviewed the data of R/M HNSCC patients treated with nivolumab between April 2017 and June 2020 at Saitama Prefectural Cancer Center. The differences in the prognosis were evaluated according to the site of distant metastasis.

RESULTS

Of the 41 patients enrolled, 26 (63.4%) had lung metastasis, 7 (17.1%) had bone metastasis, and 4 (9.8%) had liver metastasis. Ten patients (24.4%) had single-organ distant metastasis (lung metastasis in all cases). Univariate analysis identified lung metastasis alone (single-organ distant metastasis) was associated with a significantly better prognosis [HR0.37 (95% CI) 0.14-0.97 p = 0.04], while liver metastasis was associated with a significantly worse prognosis [HR3.86 (95% CI) 1.26-11.8 p = 0.02]. Multivariate analysis identified lung metastasis alone and liver metastasis as independent prognostic factors. While 7 patients (70%) with lung metastasis alone could be continued on nivolumab treatment or received subsequent chemotherapy, only 1 patient (25%) with liver metastasis received subsequent chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

The site of distant metastasis affects the prognosis of R/M HNSCC patients treated with nivolumab. Lung metastasis alone appears to be associated with a better prognosis, in that it allows easier transition to subsequent chemotherapy, while liver metastasis associates with a worse prognosis.

Peripheral lymphocytes and lactate dehydrogenase correlate with response and survival in head and neck cancers treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Little is known regarding associations between peripheral blood biomarkers (PBBMs) and survival, response, and toxicity in recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (R/M HNSCC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

METHODS

In this single-institution retrospective cohort study, a dataset of patients with R/M HNSCC treated with ICIs between 08/2012-03/2021 was established, including demographic and clinicopathologic characteristics. Pretreatment PBBMs were collected and evaluated for associations with grade ≥3 adverse events (G ≥ 3AE) by CTCAEv5, objective response (ORR) by RECIST 1.1, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS). Multivariable models for each outcome were created using elastic net variable selection.

RESULTS

Our study included 186 patients, with 51 (27%) demonstrating complete or partial response to immunotherapy. Multivariable models adjusted for ECOG performance status (PS), p16, and smoking demonstrated that pretreatment higher LDH and absolute neutrophils, as well as lower percent lymphocytes correlated with worse OS and PFS. Higher LDH and lower % lymphocytes also correlated with worse ORR.

CONCLUSIONS

In the largest study to date examining PBBMs in ICI-treated R/M HNSCCs, our variable selection method revealed PBBMs prognostic for survival and response to immunotherapy. These biomarkers warrant further investigation in a prospective study along with validation with CPS biomarker.

Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and peripheral blood biomarkers correlate with survival outcomes but not response among head and neck and salivary cancer treated with pembrolizumab and vorinostat

BACKGROUND

Associations between peripheral blood biomarkers and oncologic outcomes were explored in recurrent/metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HN) and salivary gland cancer (SGC) treated with pembrolizumab and vorinostat on a phase II trial (NCT02538510).

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Twenty-five HN and 25 SGCs were treated with pembrolizumab and vorinostat. Baseline peripheral blood was available in 21 HN and 20 SGCs and evaluated for associations with grade ≥3 adverse events (G ≥ 3AE) by CTCAEv4, objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

Higher pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and neutrophils, as well as lower pretreatment lymphocytes and T helper cells correlated with worse OS and PFS. Higher NLR further predicted increased rates of G ≥ 3AEs. No correlations with ORR were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

In a prospectively evaluated cohort of HN and SGCs treated with pembrolizumab and vorinostat, we observed novel associations between peripheral blood biomarkers and oncologic outcomes and toxicities.

Association of Pretreatment Neutrophil-to-Eosinophil Ratio with Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated with Nivolumab

BACKGROUND

There is a need to develop biomarkers for a more efficient use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Recently, it has been reported that peripheral blood components, including eosinophils, may be effective ICI biomarkers. This study was designed to evaluate the prognostic value of eosinophils for measuring the effects of nivolumab on recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included 47 patients with R/M HNSCC treated with nivolumab. Eosinophil-related biomarkers, such as absolute eosinophil count (AEC), relative eosinophil count (REC), and neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio (NER), were measured from the peripheral blood of the patients before nivolumab treatment. For each biomarker, the patients were divided into a high- and a low-value group according to their cutoff values, and these groups were compared.

RESULTS

Regarding AEC and REC, no significant improvement in the objective response rate (ORR) was observed between patients with AEC >0.9 × 103/μL and those with AEC <0.9 × 103/μL (p = 0.147) and between patients with REC >2.2% and those with REC <2.2% (p = 0.110). However, patients with NER <32 had improved ORR compared with those with NER >32 (P = 0.0361). Additionally, although patients with AEC >0.9 × 103/μL, REC >2.2%, and NER <32 had longer overall survival (OS) than those with AEC <0.9 × 103/μL, REC <2.2%, and NER >32, only patients with NER <32 showed prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) compared with those with NER >32 according to the Log rank test (p = 0.046, 0.027, and 0.035, respectively). Furthermore, the multivariate analysis revealed that baseline NER >32 (p = 0.027) was an independent prognostic factor for worse OS.

CONCLUSION

A pretreatment feature of low NER (NER <32) may predict better clinical outcomes in patients with R/M HNSCC treated with nivolumab.

Quality-of-Life Evaluation of Patients with Unresectable Locally Advanced or Locally Recurrent Head and Neck Carcinoma Treated with Head and Neck Photoimmunotherapy

Simple Summary

Head and neck photoimmunotherapy (HN-PIT) is a new treatment developed for local control of head and neck carcinoma. This study assessed the quality of life (QOL) of nine patients with unresectable locally advanced or locally recurrent head and neck carcinoma (LA/LR-HNC) treated with HN-PIT. QOL was compared before and 4 weeks after HN-PIT. There were no significant changes in all the QOL assessment parameters after treatment with HN-PIT. For patients with unresectable LA/LR-HNC, HN-PIT provided good local control without decreasing the QOL.

Abstract

Head and neck photoimmunotherapy (HN-PIT), a new treatment developed for local control of head and neck carcinoma, uses cetuximab sarotalocan sodium with a laser system to specifically destroy only tumor cells. No studies have examined the impact of HN-PIT on the quality of life (QOL) of patients with head and neck cancer. This study assessed the QOL of patients with unresectable locally advanced or locally recurrent head and neck carcinoma (LA/LR-HNC) treated with HN-PIT. Nine eligible patients with unresectable LA/LR-HNC who underwent HN-PIT at our institution between 20 January 2021 and 30 April 2022 were included in the study. They completed a QOL evaluation form. The primary endpoint was QOL assessment. The secondary endpoints were overall response rate, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival, and adverse events. QOL was compared before and 4 weeks after HN-PIT. There were no significant changes in all QOL assessment parameters after treatment with HN-PIT. The overall response rate was 89%, and safety was acceptable. For patients with unresectable LA/LR-HNC, HN-PIT provided good local control without decreasing the QOL. The addition of HN-PIT to conventional head and neck carcinoma treatment may lead to the prolongation of OS in head and neck carcinoma.

Single-center prospective study on the efficacy of nivolumab against platinum-sensitive recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Nivolumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor, is beneficial to patients with platinum-refractory recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M-HNSCC). However, platinum-sensitive R/M-HNSCC has not yet been studied. Hence, in this prospective study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of nivolumab in patients with platinum-sensitive R/M-HNSCC. This prospective single-arm study was conducted in a single institution in Japan. Patients with platinum-sensitive R/M-HNSCC (defined as head and neck cancer that recurred or metastasized at least 6 months after platinum-based chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy) were enrolled. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), immune-related adverse events (irAEs), and quality of life (QOL). This study was registered at the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000031324). Twenty-two patients with platinum-sensitive R/M-HNSCC were enrolled. The median OS was 17.4 months, and the 1-year OS rate was 73%. The median PFS was 9.6 months, 1-year PFS rate was 48%, and ORR was 36%. Sixteen irAEs were recorded in 12 patients; however, no grade 4 or 5 irAEs were observed. The QOL assessments revealed that nivolumab did not decrease the QOL of patients. Nivolumab is effective against platinum-sensitive R/M-HNSCC with acceptable safety.

An evidence mapping and scientometric analysis of the top-100 most cited clinical trials of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 drugs to treat cancers

OBJECTIVE

To gain a deeper understanding of the hot topics and future prospects of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors treatment of cancer through scientometric analysis of the top-100 most cited clinical trials.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched the Web of Science Core Collection database from 1980 to June 2019. Two reviewers independently screened the top-100 most cited clinical trials that defined by the National Institutes of Health starting from the most cited article. Title, year of publication, citations, type of cancer, and focused aspects of outcomes were extracted from included clinical trials. VOSviewer software (version 1.6.9) and Excel 2016 were used to do statistical analysis. The evidence mapping was used to present the relationship between cancers, drugs, citations, and outcomes, etc. RESULTS: The top-100 most cited clinical trials published from 2010 to 2018 in nine journals with high impact factor (IF) (IF₂₀₁₈:6.68-70.67), and Lancet Oncology (USA) published the most clinical trials (n = 29, IF₂₀₁₈ = 35.3856). The total number of citations of the top-100 most cited clinical trials was from 59 to 5606. 920 authors from 34 countries and 458 organizations participated in publishing the top-100 most cited clinical trials. The USA (n = 95) and Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (n = 31) contributed the most publications. Based on the evidence mapping, there are 25 different types of cancers (e.g. lung cancer, melanoma, and renal cell cancer) and five focused aspects of outcomes (e.g. safety and efficacy).

CONCLUSION

The USA was the dominant country. Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 drugs were widely used to treat lung cancer, melanoma, renal cell cancer, and Hodgkin lymphoma. More exploration should be done to explore the use of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 drugs to treat more type of cancers in future research.

Novel Prognostic Score for recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer patients treated with Nivolumab

Although several prognostic factors in nivolumab therapy have been reported in recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer (RM-HNC) patients, these factors remain controversial. Here, we conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study to investigate the impact of clinico-hematological factors on survival in RM-HNC patients treated with nivolumab. We reviewed 126 RM-HNC patients from seven institutes. We evaluated the prognostic effects of clinico-hematological factors on survival. The median overall survival (OS) was 12.3 months, and the 1 year-OS rate was 51.2%. Patients without immune-related adverse events, lower relative eosinophil count, worse best overall response, higher performance status, and higher modified Glasgow Prognostic Score had worse survival. The score, generated by combining these factors, was associated with survival. Patients with score of 4-5 had worse survival than those with score of 2-3 and 0-1 [adjusted HR for PFS: score of 4-5, 7.77 (3.98-15.15); score of 2-3, 3.44 (1.95-6.06), compared to score of 0-1], [adjusted HR for OS: score of 4-5, 14.66 (4.28-50.22); score of 2-3, 7.63 (2.29-25.37), compared to score of 0-1]. Our novel prognostic score utilizing clinico-hematological factors might be useful to establish an individual treatment strategy in RM-HNC patients treated with nivolumab therapy.

Effectiveness of nivolumab affected by prior cetuximab use and neck dissection in Japanese patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer: results from a retrospective observational study in a real-world setting

Background

To examine the effect of prior use of cetuximab and neck dissection on the effectiveness of nivolumab, we conducted a large-scale subgroup analysis in Japanese patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer.

Methods

Data on the effectiveness of nivolumab were extracted from patient medical records. All patients were analyzed for effectiveness by prior cetuximab use. In the analyses for prior neck dissection, only patients with locally advanced disease were included.

Results

Of 256 patients analyzed, 155 had received prior cetuximab. Nineteen of 50 patients with local recurrence underwent neck dissection. The objective response rate was 14.7 vs 17.2% (p = 0.6116), median progression-free survival was 2.0 vs 3.1 months (p = 0.0261), and median overall survival was 8.4 vs 12 months (p = 0.0548) with vs without prior cetuximab use, respectively. The objective response rate was 23.1 vs 25.9% (p = 0.8455), median progression-free survival was 1.8 vs 3.0 months (p = 0.6650), and median overall survival was 9.1 vs 9.9 months (p = 0.5289) with vs without neck dissection, respectively.

Conclusions

These findings support the use of nivolumab for patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer regardless of prior cetuximab use or neck dissection history.

Trial registration number

UMIN-CTR (UMIN000032600), Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03569436)

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10147-021-01900-4.

Predictive impact of C-reactive protein to albumin ratio for recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma receiving nivolumab

Although the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was reported to be a predictive biomarker for clinical outcomes in various types of cancer, including recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer (R/M HNSCC) treated with nivolumab, the usefulness of the pretreatment C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (CAR) as a prognostic marker remains to be clarified. This study aimed to analyze the clinical usability of the CAR in comparison with that of the NLR. 46 R/M HNSCC patients treated with nivolumab were retrospectively analyzed. The optimal cutoff value for the CAR was calculated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The optimal cutoff value for the CAR was set to 0.30. On multivariate analyses, a high CAR was significantly associated with poor overall survival (adjusted HR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.42–3.47; p < 0.01) and progression-free survival (adjusted HR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.38–2.80; p < 0.01). The overall response rate and disease control rate for the high CAR patients were lower than for the low CAR patients. The CAR had significantly higher area under the curve values than the NLR at 2 and 4 months. The pretreatment CAR might be an independent marker for prognosis and efficacy in R/M HNSCC patients treated with nivolumab.

Development and validation of a novel prognostic score for elderly head-and-neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy or chemoradiation

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To establish a clinically feasible prognostic score and nomogram based on easily accessible clinical data that will aid decision-making in elderly head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients undergoing (chemo)radiotherapy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

284 elderly HNSCC patients (≥65 years) undergoing curative (chemo)radiotherapy were included for the development of a score predicting overall survival (OS) based on the beta regression coefficients from significant parameters in a multivariate Cox regression analysis with p < 0.1 as inclusion criterion. A second, external cohort of 217 elderly HNSCC patients receiving (chemo)radiotherapy was used for validation. Using the aggregated data (n = 501), a nomogram was developed to predict 2- and 4-year OS.

RESULTS

Karnofsky Performance Status (HR = 2.654; p < 0.001), Charlson Comorbidity Index (HR = 2.598; p < 0.001) and baseline C-reactive protein (CRP) level (HR = 1.634; p = 0.068) were prognostic for OS in the multivariate analysis. An OS score based on beta regression coefficients was created, in which reduced performance status, increased comorbidity burden and increased CRP levels were included, leading to 3 distinct survival groups. The median OS for the 3 groups amounted to 107, 28 and 6 months, respectively (p < 0.001). The developed score was able to significantly differentiate between a favorable (median OS = 130 months), intermediate (29 months) and unfavorable prognosis (9 months) also in the external validation cohort (p = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

We propose a novel, validated prognostic score based on easily accessible clinical data allowing stratification between prognostic groups of elderly HNSCC patients receiving (chemo)radiotherapy. The derived nomogram for the prediction of 2-year and 4-year OS may aid decision-making for this vulnerable population.

Effectiveness and safety of nivolumab in patients with head and neck cancer in Japanese real-world clinical practice: a multicenter retrospective clinical study

BACKGROUND

To fill the data gap between clinical trials and real-world settings, this study assessed the overall effectiveness and safety of nivolumab in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) during Japanese real-world clinical practice.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, retrospective study in Japanese patients with recurrent or metastatic HNC who received nivolumab for the first time between July and December 2017. Data on the clinical use, effectiveness, and safety of nivolumab were extracted from patient medical records.

RESULTS

Overall, 256 patients were enrolled in this study. The median duration of nivolumab treatment was 72.5 days, with patients receiving a median of 6.0 (range 1-27) doses. Median overall survival (OS) was 9.5 (95% confidence interval [CI] 8.2-12.0) months and the estimated 12-month OS rate was 43.2%. The objective response rate (ORR) was 15.7% overall and 21.1%, 7.1%, and 13.6% in patients with primary nasopharynx, maxillary sinus, and salivary gland tumors, respectively, who had been excluded from CheckMate 141. Grade ≥ 3 immune-related adverse events occurred in 5.9% of patients. No new safety signals were identified compared with adverse events noted in CheckMate 141.

CONCLUSIONS

The effectiveness and safety of nivolumab in real-world clinical practice are consistent with data from the CheckMate 141 clinical trial. Therapeutic response was also observed in the groups of patients excluded from CheckMate 141.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

UMIN-CTR (UMIN000032600), Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03569436).

Real-World, Long-Term Outcomes of Nivolumab Therapy for Recurrent or Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck and Impact of the Magnitude of Best Overall Response: A Retrospective Multicenter Study of 88 Patients

Simple Summary

No real-world, long-term outcomes of immunotherapy with nivolumab for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN) have yet been reported. Furthermore, the prognostic impact of the best overall response (BOR) of this therapy remains unclear. We conducted a multi-institutional cohort study of the long-term efficacy and safety of this therapy. We also evaluated the relationship between BOR and survival. Median follow-up time was 25.9 months. Median overall survival (OS) was 9.6 months, and two-year survival rate was 25.0%. Overall response rate was 18%, and disease control rate was 48%. For immune-related adverse events (irAEs), 38 irAEs were detected in 29 patients. The development of irAEs and better BOR were significantly associated with longer survival. These findings demonstrate the long-term efficacy and safety of nivolumab therapy for R/M SCCHN in a real-world setting. The magnitude of BOR and the development of irAEs might be useful surrogate markers of survival.

Abstract

No real-world, long-term outcomes of immunotherapy with nivolumab for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN) have yet been reported. Furthermore, the prognostic impact of the best overall response (BOR) of this therapy remains unclear. We conducted a multi-institutional cohort study of the long-term efficacy and safety of this therapy and investigated prognostic factors associated with survival. Further, we evaluated the relationship between BOR and survival. Median follow-up time was 25.9 months. Median overall survival (OS) was 9.6 months, and two-year survival rate was 25.0%. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.7 months, and two-year PFS rate was 19.6%. BOR was assessed as complete response (CR) in 6%, partial response (PR) in 13%, stable disease (SD) in 30%, and progressive disease (PD) in 52% of the patients. Overall response rate was 18%, and disease control rate was 48%. For immune-related adverse events (irAEs), 38 irAEs were detected in 29 patients. On multivariate analysis, the development of irAEs was significantly associated with better OS and PFS. Better BOR was significantly associated with longer OS and PFS. These findings demonstrate the long-term efficacy and safety of nivolumab therapy for R/M SCCHN in a real-world setting. The magnitude of BOR and the development of irAEs might be useful surrogate markers of survival.

Eosinophil prognostic scores for patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab

Although nivolumab, a programmed cell death 1 (PD‐1) inhibitor, is a standard therapy for platinum‐refractory recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC), no definitive biomarkers have been reported thus far. This study aimed to select promising prognostic markers in nivolumab therapy and to create a novel prognostic scoring system. In this retrospective cohort study, we reviewed patients with R/M HNSCC who were treated with nivolumab from April 2017 to April 2019. We developed a prognostic score for immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy that was weighed using hazard ratio–based scoring algorithms. Significant variables were selected from the multivariate Cox proportional hazard analyses on overall survival (OS). A total of 85 patients with HNSCC were analyzed in the present study. The relative eosinophil count (REC), the ratio of eosinophil increase (REI), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) were selected as variables affecting the prognostic score. The patients were divided into four groups: very good (score = 0), good (score = 1), intermediate (score = 2), and poor (score = 3). The OS hazard ratios were 2.77, 10.18, and 33.21 for the good, intermediate, and poor risk groups compared with the very good risk group, respectively. The Eosinophil Prognostic Score is a novel prognostic score that is effective for predicting the prognosis of HNSCC patients treated with nivolumab. This score is more precise as it includes changes in biomarkers before and after the treatment.

Efficacy and safety of nivolumab in 100 patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer - a retrospective multicentre study

Background: No large-scale retrospective studies have examined the efficacy and safety of nivolumab. Objective: This retrospective study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of nivolumab administered to patients in multiple facilities. Material and methods: The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) and secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). For safety, adverse event occurrence rates by grade, deaths and severe adverse events were investigated. OS and PFS were also examined according to whether immune-related adverse events (irAEs) appeared. Statistical analysis was conducted using log-rank testing, with values of p < .05 considered significant. Results: Nivolumab was administered to 100 patients with a history of receiving platinum-based drugs. ORR was 13.5% and disease control rate was 49.0%. Median PFS was 3.7 months. Median OS was 9.6 months. For all grades, irAEs occurred in 30 patients. The 1-year survival rate in the subgroup without irAEs was 34.0%, compared to 52.6% with irAEs (p = .041). Conclusions and significance: The 1-year survival rate was better in patients who developed irAEs. This is a new finding for head and neck cancer. Appearance of irAEs could also be used as an indicator of expected therapeutic effect in head and neck cancer.

Current status of prognostic factors in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

In recent years, the induction of novel agents, including molecular-targeted agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors, have dramatically changed therapeutic options and their outcomes for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Several prognostic models based on the data of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with targeted agents or cytokine therapy have been useful in real clinical practice. Serum or peripheral blood markers related to inflammatory response have been reported to be associated with their prognosis or therapeutic efficacy. In addition to them, investigation for novel predictive factors that represent the efficacy of agents, the risk of adverse events and the prognosis are required for the advance of therapeutic strategies. The present review discusses the conventional prognostic models and clinical factors, and recent advances of the identification of some of the most promising molecules as novel biomarkers for metastatic renal cell carcinoma.