MiT Family Translocation Renal Cell Carcinoma: from the Early Descriptions to the Current Knowledge

The New WHO Category of "Molecularly Defined Renal Carcinomas": Clinical and Diagnostic Features and Management Implications

The evolution of classification of renal tumors has been impacted since the turn of the millennium by rapid progress in histopathology, immunohistochemistry, and molecular genetics. Together, these features have enabled firm recognition of specific, classic types of renal cell carcinomas, such as clear cell renal cell carcinoma, that in current practice trigger histologic-type specific management and treatment protocols. Now, the fifth Edition World Health Classification's new category of "Molecularly defined renal carcinomas" changes the paradigm, defining a total of seven entities based specifically on their fundamental molecular underpinnings. These tumors, which include TFE3-rearranged, TFEB-altered, ELOC-mutated, fumarate hydratase-deficient, succinate dehydrogenase-deficient, ALK-rearranged, and SMARCB1-deficient renal medullary carcinoma, encompass a wide clinical and histopathologic phenotypic spectrum of tumors. Already, important management aspects are apparent for several of these entities, while emerging therapeutic angles are coming into view. A brief, clinically-oriented introduction of the entities in this new category, focusing on relevant diagnostic, molecular, and management aspects, is the subject of this review.

Renal mass biopsy - a practical and clinicopathologically relevant approach to diagnosis

Advancements in imaging modalities have increased the frequency of renal mass discovery. Imaging has typically been considered sufficient to guide management for a large proportion of these tumours, but renal mass biopsies (RMBs) have an increasing role in determining malignancy and can be a valuable tool for preventing unnecessary surgery in patients with benign tumours. A structured approach should be used to help to navigate the expanding repertoire of renal tumours, many of which are molecularly defined. In terms of tumour subtyping, the pathologist's strategy should focus on stratifying patients into clinically different prognostic groups according to our current knowledge of tumour behaviour, including benign, low-grade or indolent, intermediate malignant or highly aggressive. Crucial pathological features and morphological mimicry of tumours can alter the tumour's prognostic group. Thus, pathologists and urologists can use RMB to select patients with tumours at a reduced risk of progression, which can be safely managed with active surveillance within a tailored imaging schedule, versus tumours for which ablation or surgical intervention is indicated. RMB is also crucial in the oncological setting to distinguish between different high-grade tumours and guide tailored management strategies.

Clear cell and non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma in young adults: clinicopathological features, survival outcomes and prognostic factors

OBJECTIVES

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is infrequent among young adults. Few studies reported the outcome of RCC in young adults by pathological subtypes. The purpose of this study was to explore the clinicopathological features, survival outcomes and prognostic factors of young adult patients with clear cell (CCRCC) and non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (NCCRCC).

METHODS

This study included young adult patients aged 18-40 years who were diagnosed as renal cell carcinoma (RCC) between 2012 and 2022 at Peking University Third Hospital. All patients underwent either partial nephrectomy or radical nephrectomy, and some received adjuvant therapy. A comparative analysis was performed to investigate the differences in clinicopathological characteristics between the cohort of CCRCC and NCCRCC. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was utilized to plot survival curves for young adults with RCC. The univariate and multifactorial prognostic analyses were conducted using the log-rank test and COX proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

A total of 300 RCC patients aged 18-40 years were performed, of which 201 were diagnosed with CCRCC (67%) and 99 were diagnosed with NCCRCC(33%). The NCCRCC included 29 cases (9.7%) of chromophobe RCC, 28 cases (9.3%) of MiT family translocation RCC, 22 cases (7.3%) of papillary RCC, 11 cases (3.7%) of low malignant potential multifocal cystic RCC, and 6 cases of unclassified RCC (2.0%), 2 cases of mucinous tubule and spindle cell carcinoma (0.7%), and 1 case of FH-deficient RCC (0.3%).The mean age was 33.4 ± 6.1 years old. The overall and progression free 5-year survival rate was 99.1 and 95.3%, respectively. The NCCRCC cohort demonstrated a statistically significant decrease in progression-free survival (PFS) rate when compared to the CCRCC cohort (p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference observed in overall survival (OS) (p = 0.069). Pathological stage was a significant independent predictor for OS (p = 0.045). Pathological stage and nuclear grade were both independent predictors for PFS (p = 0.020; p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical and pathological features of young adults diagnosed with CCRCC exhibit notable distinctions from those of NCCRCC patients. The survival outcome was significantly influenced by the pathological stage, while both the nuclear grade and pathological stage had a significant impact on tumor progression. This study offered significant contributions to the understanding of the clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic determinants of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in young adults.

Fumarate Hydratase-Deficient Renal Cell Carcinoma with Nucleolar Pattern of GATA3 Immunoexpression: Report of 2 Cases

Fumarate hydratase-deficient renal cell carcinoma (FH-deficient RCC) is a rare aggressive type of renal cell carcinoma. The significant morphologic overlap with other types of renal neoplasia and the limited availability of FH and 2-succinylcholine immunostains for diagnostic use outside large referral centers have created numerous diagnostic pitfalls. As FH-deficient RCC can be associated with hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell cancer syndrome, the importance of an accurate diagnosis goes beyond the prognosis and treatment of an individual patient. We present 2 patients with FH-deficient RCC showing a peculiar pattern of GATA3 immunoexpression restricted to tumor nucleoli. If confirmed in further larger studies, this could provide an additional diagnostic clue for considering the FH-deficient RCC diagnosis, and given the frequent papillary morphology and possible hilar location can lead to the misdiagnosis as high-grade urothelial carcinoma, and is an important diagnostic pitfall to be aware of.

TFE3-Splicing Factor Fusions Represent Functional Drivers and Druggable Targets in Translocation Renal Cell Carcinoma

TFE3 is a member of the basic helix-loop-helix leucine zipper MiT transcription factor family, and its chimeric proteins are associated with translocation renal cell carcinoma (tRCC). Despite the variety of gene fusions, most TFE3 fusion partner genes are related to spliceosome machinery. Dissecting the function of TFE3 fused to spliceosome machinery factors (TFE3-SF) could direct the development of effective therapies for this lethal disease, which is refractory to standard treatments for kidney cancer. Here, by using a combination of in silico structure prediction, transcriptome profiling, molecular characterization, and high-throughput high-content screening (HTHCS), we interrogated a number of oncogenic mechanisms of TFE3-SF fusions. TFE3-SF fusions drove the transformation of kidney cells and promoted distinct oncogenic phenotypes in a fusion partner-dependent manner, differentially altering the transcriptome and RNA splicing landscape and activating different oncogenic pathways. Inhibiting TFE3-SF dimerization reversed its oncogenic activity and represented a potential target for therapeutic intervention. Screening the FDA-approved drugs library LOPAC and a small-molecule library (Microsource) using HTHCS combined with FRET technology identified compounds that inhibit TFE3-SF dimerization. Hit compounds were validated in 2D and 3D patient-derived xenograft models expressing TFE3-SF. The antihistamine terfenadine decreased cell proliferation and reduced in vivo tumor growth of tRCC. Overall, these results unmask therapeutic strategies to target TFE3-SF dimerization for treating patients with tRCC.

SIGNIFICANCE

TFE3-splicing factor fusions possess both transcription and splicing factor functions that remodel the transcriptome and spliceosome and can be targeted with dimerization inhibitors to suppress the growth of translocation renal cell carcinoma.

Advanced renal cell carcinoma management: the Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG) and the Latin American Renal Cancer Group (LARCG) consensus update

PURPOSE

Renal cell carcinoma is an aggressive disease with a high mortality rate. Management has drastically changed with the new era of immunotherapy, and novel strategies are being developed; however, identifying systemic treatments is still challenging. This paper presents an update of the expert panel consensus from the Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group and the Latin American Renal Cancer Group on advanced renal cell carcinoma management in Brazil.

METHODS

A panel of 34 oncologists and experts in renal cell carcinoma discussed and voted on the best options for managing advanced disease in Brazil, including systemic treatment of early and metastatic renal cell carcinoma as well as nonclear cell tumours. The results were compared with the literature and graded according to the level of evidence.

RESULTS

Adjuvant treatments benefit patients with a high risk of recurrence after surgery, and the agents used are pembrolizumab and sunitinib, with a preference for pembrolizumab. Neoadjuvant treatment is exceptional, even in initially unresectable cases. First-line treatment is mainly based on tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs); the choice of treatment is based on the International Metastatic Database Consortium (IMCD) risk score. Patients at favourable risk receive ICIs in combination with TKIs. Patients classified as intermediate or poor risk receive ICIs, without preference for ICI + ICIs or ICI + TKIs. Data on nonclear cell renal cancer treatment are limited. Active surveillance has a place in treating favourable-risk patients. Either denosumab or zoledronic acid can be used for treating metastatic bone disease.

CONCLUSION

Immunotherapy and targeted therapy are the standards of care for advanced disease. The utilization and sequencing of these therapeutic agents hinge upon individual risk scores and responses to previous treatments. This consensus reflects a commitment to informed decision-making, drawn from professional expertise and evidence in the medical literature.

Prognosis and Clinicopathological Characters of Adult TFEB-Altered Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Single Center Experience of 18 Cases

INTRODUCTION

TFEB-altered renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a rare entity characterized by the rearrangement of the TFEB gene or TFEB amplified. The therapeutic implications and long-term survival of TFEB-altered RCC remain unclear, especially for metastatic cases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The current study initially enrolled 7604 consecutive RCC patients at our center and a total of 248 patients were selected for FISH and immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis. Eventually, eighteen TFEB-altered RCC patients were identified. We then reported the clinical, morphological, IHC, and radiological features of these cases.

RESULTS

The median age at initial diagnosis was 45 years, ranging from 18 years to 66 years. The majority of the TFEB-altered RCC patients were male (61.1%), with localized disease (T1-2N0M0, 77.8%). The median split TFEB fluorescent signal was 24%, ranging from 15%-80%. The morphological characteristics of TFEB-altered RCC were variable, with acinar, papillary, solid, or nest patterns. IHC and magnetic resonance imaging features of TFEB-altered RCC were nonspecific. Nine patients with localized disease received partial nephrectomy and five patients with localized disease received radical nephrectomy. During the median follow-up of 67 months, no signs of recurrence or metastasis were found in these patients. Two patients had distant metastasis and received axitinib plus PD-1 immunotherapy. One of them died at 40-month follow-up and another still alive at 88-month follow-up.

CONCLUSION

TFEB-altered RCC is an extremely rare variant, exhibited mixed morphological characteristics. The radiological feature lack specificity, resembling clear cell RCC or papillary RCC. Genetic analyses including FISH analysis is crucial in the diagnosis of TFEB-altered RCC. For localized TFEB-altered RCC, both radical nephrectomy and partial nephrectomy conferred satisfactory prognosis. For metastatic TFEB-altered RCC, immunotherapy-based drug combinations could be a promising treatment strategy.

Treatment of metastatic TFE3 microphthalmia transcription factor translocation renal cell carcinoma: a case report

Background

Microphthalmia-associated transcription factor/transcription factor E (MiTF/TFE) translocation renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a rare type of non-clear cell RCC (nccRCC), which is more common in females. Currently, there is no standardized treatment for advanced metastatic microphthalmia translocation RCC (MiT-RCC). The main treatment modalities include surgery, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor or vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) inhibitors, mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors, and targeted therapy against the mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) factor signaling pathway.

Case Description

We present the case of an 8-year-old male patient with hematuria and paroxysmal urinary pain. Based on tumor genetic testing results and targeted drug matching analysis, the patient underwent tumor biopsy, tumor radical surgery with vascular osteotomy, and cervicothoracic lymph node dissection. The patient was then treated with a combination of immunotherapy [sintilimab, a drug directed against programmed cell death receptor-1 (PD-1)] and VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) (from pazopanib to sunitinib). Throughout the 10 cycles of conventional chemotherapy (seven courses of sintilimab since the start of the third chemotherapy treatment), the patient's condition remained stable, with no tumor recurrence at the primary site. However, in the later stages, the patient developed a large amount of ascites, and the family requested discontinuation of treatment, ultimately leading to the patient's death.

Conclusions

In this case report, we summarize the therapeutic strategy of a young patient with metastatic transcription factor E3 (TFE3) MiT-RCC. For this disease, early immunotherapy and the use of precision-targeted drugs may have a favorable impact on the survival prognosis of the patient but may still be of less benefit in children with advanced multiple metastases. Therefore, further research on tumor driver genes, among other treatment components, is urgently needed to improve precision therapy.

A nomogram based on TFE3 IHC results and clinical factors as a preliminary screening scheme for TFE3-rearranged renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

TFE3 immunohistochemistry (TFE3-IHC) is controversial in the diagnosis of TFE3-rearranged renal cell carcinoma (TFE3-rearranged RCC). This study is to investigate the accuracy and sensitivity of IHC and establish a predictive model to diagnose TFE3-rearranged RCC.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis was performed by collecting IHC and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) results from 228 patients. IHC results were evaluated using three scoring systems. Scoring system 1 is graded based on nuclear staining intensity, scoring system 2 is graded based on the percentage of stained tumor cell nuclei, and scoring system 3 is graded based on both the nuclear staining intensity and the percentage. We collected patients' IHC results and clinical information. Important variables were screened based on univariate logistic regression analysis. Then, independent risk factors were established through multivariate logistic regression, and a nomogram model was constructed. The model was validated in internal test set and external validation set. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve), calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were generated to assess discriminative ability of the model.

RESULTS

The accuracy of IHC based on three scoring systems were 0.829, 0.772, and 0.807, respectively. The model included four factors including age, gender, lymph node metastasis and IHC results. Area under the curve (AUC) values were 0.935 for the training set, 0.934 for the internal test set, 0.933 for all 228 patients, and 0.916 for the external validation set.

CONCLUSIONS

TFE3 IHC has high accuracy in the diagnosis of TFE3-rearranged RCC. Clinical information such as age and lymph node metastasis are independent risk factors, which can be used as a supplement to the results of TFE3 IHC. This study confirms the value of IHC in the diagnosis of TFE3-rearranged RCC. The accuracy of the diagnosis can be improved by incorporating IHC with other clinical risk factors.

Comparative genomics incorporating translocation renal cell carcinoma mouse model reveals molecular mechanisms of tumorigenesis

Translocation renal cell carcinoma (tRCC) most commonly involves an ASPSCR1-TFE3 fusion, but molecular mechanisms remain elusive and animal models are lacking. Here, we show that human ASPSCR1-TFE3 driven by Pax8-Cre (a credentialed clear cell RCC driver) disrupted nephrogenesis and glomerular development, causing neonatal death, while the clear cell RCC failed driver, Sglt2-Cre, induced aggressive tRCC (as well as alveolar soft part sarcoma) with complete penetrance and short latency. However, in both contexts, ASPSCR1-TFE3 led to characteristic morphological cellular changes, loss of epithelial markers, and an epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Electron microscopy of tRCC tumors showed lysosome expansion, and functional studies revealed simultaneous activation of autophagy and mTORC1 pathways. Comparative genomic analyses encompassing an institutional human tRCC cohort (including a hitherto unreported SFPQ-TFEB fusion) and a variety of tumorgraft models (ASPSCR1-TFE3, PRCC-TFE3, SFPQ-TFE3, RBM10-TFE3, and MALAT1-TFEB) disclosed significant convergence in canonical pathways (cell cycle, lysosome, and mTORC1) and less established pathways such as Myc, E2F, and inflammation (IL-6/JAK/STAT3, interferon-γ, TLR signaling, systemic lupus, etc.). Therapeutic trials (adjusted for human drug exposures) showed antitumor activity of cabozantinib. Overall, this study provides insight into MiT/TFE-driven tumorigenesis, including the cell of origin, and characterizes diverse mouse models available for research.

From the regulatory mechanism of TFEB to its therapeutic implications

Transcription factor EB (TFEB), known as a major transcriptional regulator of the autophagy-lysosomal pathway, regulates target gene expression by binding to coordinated lysosomal expression and regulation (CLEAR) elements. TFEB are regulated by multiple links, such as transcriptional regulation, post-transcriptional regulation, translational-level regulation, post-translational modification (PTM), and nuclear competitive regulation. Targeted regulation of TFEB has been victoriously used as a treatment strategy in several disease models such as ischemic injury, lysosomal storage disorders (LSDs), cancer, metabolic disorders, neurodegenerative diseases, and inflammation. In this review, we aimed to elucidate the regulatory mechanism of TFEB and its applications in several disease models by targeting the regulation of TFEB as a treatment strategy.

Primary retroperitoneal renal cell carcinoma associated with transcription EB gene fusion

BACKGROUND

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with the distinct type of t(6;11) (p21;q12) translocation (transcription factor EB, TFEB) is a rare neoplasm. It is even less when talks about primary retroperitoneal TFEB RCCs. To our knowledge, no previous literature has been reported about this kind of RCCs. In this article, we report a case of primary retroperitoneal renal cell carcinoma associated with transcription EB gene fusion.

METHODS

A 73-year-old male patient presented with a retroperitoneal mass for more than one month.

RESULTS

Pathologically, the mass was soft and colorful, tumor cells showed a biphasic morphology characterized by nests of larger epithelioid cells surrounding intraluminal collections of smaller cells clustered around basement membrane materia. These tumor cells were positive for Pax-8, EMA, TFEB, CK, P504S, Vimentin and CD10 on immunohistochemical stain, and positive for TFEB on fluorescence in situ hybridization assay.

CONCLUSIONS

We reported the first case of primary retroperitoneal renal cell carcinoma associated with transcription EB gene fusion. The pathological feature of the case we reported was very typical. The best treatment at presentation is the total resection. Long-term follow-up study is needed in order to acquire better diagonitic quality and fulfill diagnostic requirements.

Therapeutic strategies and predictive models for Xp11.2 translocation/TFE3 gene fusion renal cell carcinoma in adults based on data of two Chinese medical centers

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to establish an effective predictive model for predicting Xp11.2 translocation/TFE3 gene fusion renal cell carcinoma (TFE3-RCC) and develop optimal therapeutic strategies.

METHODS

Data from 4961 patients diagnosed with renal cell carcinoma at two medical centers in China were retrospectively analyzed. A cohort of 1571 patients from Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Ra cohort) was selected to construct the model. Another cohort of 1124 patients from the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University was used for external validation (the Ha cohort). All patients with TFE3-RCC in both cohorts were included in the Ta cohort for the prognostic analysis. Univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of the predictive nomogram. The apparent performance of the model was validated. Decision curve analysis was also performed to assess the clinical utility of the developed model. Factors associated with progression and prognosis in the Ta cohort were analyzed using the log-rank method, and Cox regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to describe the effects of factors on prognosis and progression.

RESULTS

Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses demonstrated that age, sex, BMI, smoking, eosinophils, and LDL were independent predictors of TFE3-RCC. Therefore, a predictive nomogram for TFE3-RCC, which had good discriminatory power (AUC = 0.796), was constructed. External validation (AUC = 0.806) also revealed good predictive ability. The calibration curves displayed good consistency between the predicted and observed incidences of TFE3-RCC. Invasion of regional lymph nodes, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and surgical methods were independent factors associated with progression. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors are independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSION

This study not only proposed a high-precision clinical prediction model composed of various variables for the early diagnosis of Xp11.2 translocation/TFE3 gene fusion renal cell carcinoma but also optimized therapeutic strategies through prognostic analysis.

mTOR eosinophilic renal cell carcinoma: a distinctive tumor characterized by mTOR mutation, loss of chromosome 1, cathepsin-K expression, and response to target therapy

In the spectrum of oncocytic renal neoplasms, a subset of tumors with high-grade-appearing histologic features harboring pathogenic mutations in mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and hitherto clinical indolent behavior has been described. Three cases (2F,1 M) with histologically documented metastases (lymph node, skull, and liver) were retrieved and extensively investigated by immunohistochemistry, FISH, and next-generation sequencing. Tumors were composed of eosinophilic cells with prominent nucleoli (G3 by ISUP/WHO) arranged in solid to nested architecture. Additionally, there were larger cells with perinuclear cytoplasmic shrinkage and sparse basophilic Nissl-like granules, superficially resembling the so-called spider cells of cardiac rhabdomyomas. The renal tumors, including the skull and liver metastases, showed immunoexpression PAX8, CK8-18, and cathepsin-K, and negativity for vimentin. NGS identified mTOR genetic alterations in the three cases, including the skull and liver metastases. One patient was then treated with Everolimus (mTOR inhibitors) with clinical response (metastatic tumor shrinkage). We present a distinct renal tumor characterized by high-grade eosinophilic cells, cathepsin-K immunohistochemical expression, and harboring mTOR gene mutations demonstrating a malignant potential and showing responsiveness to mTOR inhibitors.

Case Reports of TFE3-Rearranged Renal Cell Carcinoma: FDG-PET Uptake Might Help Diagnosis

Translocation and transcription factor E3 (TFE3)-rearranged renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a rare subtype of RCCs characterised by the fusion of the TFE3 transcription factor genes on chromosome Xp11.2 with one of the multiple genes. TFE3-rearranged RCC occurs mainly in children and adolescents, although middle-aged cases are also observed. As computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of TFE3-rearranged RCC overlap with those of other RCCs, differential diagnosis is often challenging. In the present case reports, we highlighted the features of the fluorine-18-labelled fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with CT (FDG PET-CT) in TFE3-rearranged RCCs. Due to the rarity of the disease, FDG PET-CT features of TFE3-rearranged RCC have not yet been reported. In our cases, FDG PET-CT showed high standardised uptake values (SUVmax) of 7.14 and 6.25 for primary tumours. This might imply that TFE3-rearranged RCC has high malignant potential. This is conceivable when the molecular background of the disease is considered in terms of glucose metabolism. Our cases suggest that a high SUVmax of the primary tumour is a clinical characteristic of TFE3-rearranged RCCs.

Clinical Characteristics of Molecularly Defined Renal Cell Carcinomas

Kidney tumors comprise a broad spectrum of different histopathological entities, with more than 0.4 million newly diagnosed cases each year, mostly in middle-aged and older men. Based on the description of the 2022 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of renal cell carcinoma (RCC), some new categories of tumor types have been added according to their specific molecular typing. However, studies on these types of RCC are still superficial, many types of these RCC currently lack accurate diagnostic standards in the clinic, and treatment protocols are largely consistent with the treatment guidelines for clear cell RCC (ccRCC), which might result in worse treatment outcomes for patients with these types of molecularly defined RCC. In this article, we conduct a narrative review of the literature published in the last 15 years on molecularly defined RCC. The purpose of this review is to summarize the clinical features and the current status of research on the detection and treatment of molecularly defined RCC.

TFE3 gene rearrangement and protein expression contribute to a poor prognosis of renal cell carcinoma

Background

TFE3-rearranged renal cell carcinoma (TFE3-rearranged RCC) is a type of kidney cancer with a low incidence, with no consensus about whether it has a worse prognosis than clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). This study attempted to elucidate the impact of TFE3-rearranged RCC by analyzing its clinical features and prognosis.

Methods

Patients treated in Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital (SYSMH) who were suspected to be diagnosed with TFE3-rearranged RCC were divided into two groups, TFE3-rearranged RCC and ccRCC with positive TFE3 protein expression on immunohistochemistry [TFE3(+) ccRCC], by dual-color, break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). After balancing the baseline characteristics with TFE3(+) ccRCC using the propensity score matching (PSM) method in a ratio of 2, we selected patients diagnosed with ccRCC with negative TFE3 protein expression on immunohistochemistry [TFE3(-) ccRCC]. The impact of TFE3 gene rearrangement and protein expression on renal cell carcinoma was determined by feature comparison with a nonparametric test and survival analysis with the Kaplan‒Meier method.

Results

Among 37 patients suspected of having TFE3-rearranged RCC, 13 patients were diagnosed with TFE3-rearranged RCC, and 24 patients had TFE3(+) ccRCC. The recurrence and new metastasis of TFE3-rearranged RCC was relatively common, even if the tumor stage was early at the first diagnosis. Through feature comparison and survival analysis, we found that TFE3-rearranged RCC was quite similar to TFE3(+) ccRCC. Compared with TFE3(-) ccRCC, TFE3(+) ccRCC tended to have a larger tumor diameter (P = 0.011), higher neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (P = 0.017) and metastatic potential (P = 0.022), and worse overall survival (OS) (P = 0.043) and PFS (P = 0.016). The survival analysis showed that TFE3-rearranged RCC had a worse PFS than ccRCC (P = 0.002), and TFE3(+) RCC had a worse PFS than TFE3(-) RCC (P = 0.001). According to the stratification system based on the combination of TFE3 and lymphovascular invasion (LVI), we further found that the prognosis from good to poor was TFE3(-) LVI(-), TFE3(+) LVI(-), TFE3(+) LVI(+) and TFE3(-) LVI(+), with statistically significant differences in both OS (P = 0.001) and PFS (P < 0.001). In addition, we also reported two cases with poor prognosis, of which one was TFE3-rearranged RCC and the other was TFE3(+) ccRCC.

Conclusions

This is a novel finding that both FISH confirmed TFE3 gene rearrangement-mediated TFE3-rearranged RCC and IHC confirmed positive TFE3 protein expression [TFE3(+)] contribute to a poor prognosis in RCC, suggesting more active treatment and careful follow-up for TFE3(+) RCC patients. The combination of TFE3 and LVI may be a new risk stratification system for RCC.

Clinico-pathological implications of the 2022 WHO Renal Cell Carcinoma classification

The new WHO classification of urogenital tumours published in 2022, contains significant revisions upon the previous 2016 version regarding Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC). While the most common histotype remains almost untouched, some of the main novelties concerns papillary RCC and oncocytic neoplasms. The main change is the introduction of a new category of molecularly-defined RCC, which includes TFE3-rearranged RCC, TFEB-rearranged, and TFEB-amplified RCC, FH-deficient RCC, SDH-deficient RCC, ALK-rearranged RCC, ELOC (formerly TCEB1)-mutated RCC, SMARCB1 (INI1)-deficient RCC. In this paper we analyze the current knowledge on emerging entities and molecularly-defined RCC to assess whether the current pathological classification offers the oncologist the possibility of selecting more specific and personalized treatments, from both those currently available, as well as those that will soon be available.

TRIM28 represses renal cell carcinoma cell proliferation by inhibiting TFE3/KDM6A-regulated autophagy

Autophagy plays a pivotal role in physiology and pathophysiology, including cancer. Mechanisms of autophagy dysregulation in cancer remain elusive. Loss-of-function of TRIM28, a multi-function protein, is seen in familial kidney malignancy, but the mechanism by which TRIM28 contributes to the etiology of kidney malignancy is unclear. In this study, we show TRIM28 retards kidney cancer cell proliferation through inhibiting autophagy. Mechanistically, we find TRIM28 promotes ubiquitination and proteasome-mediated degradation of transcription factor TFE3, which is critical for autophagic gene expression. Genetic activation of TFE3 due to gene fusion is known to cause human kidney malignancy, but whether and how transcription activation by TFE3 involves chromatin changes is unclear. Here, we find another mode of TFE3 activation in human renal carcinoma. We find that TFE3 is constitutively localized to the cell nucleus in human and mouse kidney cancer, where it increases autophagic gene expression and promotes cell autophagy as well as proliferation. We further uncover that TFE3 interacts with and recruits histone H3K27 demethylase KDM6A for autophagic gene upregulation. We reveal that KDM6A contributes to expression of TFE3 target genes through increasing H3K4me3 rather than demethylating H3K27. Collectively, in this study, we identify a functional TRIM28-TFE3-KDM6A signal axis which plays a critical role in kidney cancer cell autophagy and proliferation.

Emerging roles of TFE3 in metabolic regulation

TFE3 is a member of the MiT family of the bHLH-leucine zipper transcription factor. We previously focused on the role of TFE3 in autophagy and cancer. Recently, an increasing number of studies have revealed that TFE3 plays an important role in metabolic regulation. TFE3 participates in the metabolism of energy in the body by regulating pathways such as glucose and lipid metabolism, mitochondrial metabolism, and autophagy. This review summarizes and discusses the specific regulatory mechanisms of TFE3 in metabolism. We determined both the direct regulation of TFE3 on metabolically active cells, such as hepatocytes and skeletal muscle cells, and the indirect regulation of TFE3 through mitochondrial quality control and the autophagy-lysosome pathway. The role of TFE3 in tumor cell metabolism is also summarized in this review. Understanding the diverse roles of TFE3 in metabolic processes can provide new avenues for the treatment of some metabolism-related disorders.

TFEB ‐translocated and ‐amplified renal cell carcinoma with VEGFA co‐amplification: A case of long‐term control by multimodal therapy including a vascular endothelial growth factor‐receptor inhibitor

Introduction

Renal cell carcinoma with TFEB amplification is rare and reportedly aggressive. We herein report a case of renal cell carcinoma with TFEB translocation and amplification in which long-term control was achieved by multimodal therapy including a vascular endothelial growth factor -receptor inhibitor.

Case presentation

A 70-year-old man was referred to our institution for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma with multinodal metastases. Open nephrectomy and lymph node dissection were performed. Immunohistochemistry for transcription factor EB was positive, and fluorescent in situ hybridization revealed TFEB rearrangement and amplification. The diagnosis was TFEB-translocated and -amplified renal cell carcinoma. VEGFA amplification was also demonstrated by fluorescent in situ hybridization. The residual and recurrent tumors were treated and controlled for 52 months by vascular endothelial growth factor-receptor target therapy, radiation therapy, and additional surgery.

Conclusion

A good long-term response to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drug therapy may be due to VEGFA amplification and subsequent vascular endothelial growth factor overexpression.

Clinical and pathological heterogeneity of four common fusion subtypes in Xp11.2 translocation renal cell carcinoma

Background

Xp11.2 translocation renal cell carcinoma (Xp11.2 tRCC) is a group of rare and highly heterogeneous renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The translocation involving TFE3 and different fusion partners lead to overexpression of the chimeric protein. The purpose of this study is to explore the clinicopathological features of Xp11.2 tRCC with four common fusion subtypes.

Methods

We screened out 40 Xp11.2 tRCC patients from January 2007 to August 2021 in our institution. The diagnosis was initially confirmed by TFE3 immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay and their fusion partners were verified by RNA sequencing. Then the 40 cases were divided into two groups (DBHS family and non-DBHS family group) and a clinical comparison among the four common fusion subtypes was performed.

Results

Among the 40 cases, 11 cases with SFPQ-TFE3 gene fusion and 7 cases with NONO-TFE3 gene fusion were classified in DBHS group, the remaining cases with ASPL-TFE3 (11 cases) or PRCC-TFE3 (11 cases) gene fusion were classified in non-DBHS group. Lymph node (LN) metastasis (P=0.027) and distant metastasis (P=0.009) were more common seen in non-DBHS family group than DBHS family group and cases in DBHS family group have better progressive-free survival (PFS) (P=0.02). In addition, ASPL-TFE3 fusion was associated with worse outcome (P=0.03) while NONO-TFE3 fusion (P=0.04) predicted a better prognosis.

Conclusions

Different fusion partner genes may play a functional role in various morphology, molecular and biological features of Xp11.2 tRCCs. The impact of fusion partners on clinical characteristics of Xp11.2 tRCCs deserves further exploration.

Primary Alveolar Soft-Part Sarcoma of the Lung: A Case Report

Alveolar soft-part sarcoma is a rare type of soft tissue malignant tumor. Although the tumor can occur in many parts of the body, primary alveolar soft-part sarcoma of the lung is extremely rare. According to previous literature, only 3 cases of primary alveolar soft-part sarcoma of the lung were reported, and no comprehensive analysis was conducted on these cases. Here, we describe another case of alveolar soft-part sarcoma in the lung, where the negative results of immunohistochemical staining cause extreme difficulty in distinguishing this lesion from other tumors. A 30-year-old Chinese male presented with chest pain and dyspnea. Computed tomography revealed a pulmonary mass, and biopsy results showed vacuolar tumor cells with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm. A number of immunohistochemical markers were negative, but the tumor cells were positive for TFE3 and ASPSCR1::TFE3 fusion gene. No other tumor masses were found in the patient after whole-body scanning. The final diagnosis was primary alveolar soft-part sarcoma of the lung. Pathologists should consider the possibility of alveolar soft-part sarcoma in lung tumors with typical "organ like" or "acinar like" cell nests, where the tumor cells are large, vacuolated, and the nucleolus is obvious. After excluding metastasis from other sites, TFE3 immunohistochemical staining and ASPSCR1::TFE3 fusion gene detection are recommended for the diagnosis of primary alveolar soft-part sarcoma.

A Novel Predictive Model of Pathological Lymph Node Metastasis Constructed with Preoperative Independent Predictors in Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma

Introduction: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is one of the most common urinary tumors. The risk of metastasis for patients with RCC is about 1/3, among which 30−40% have lymph node metastasis, and the existence of lymph node metastasis will greatly reduce the survival rate of patients. However, the necessity of lymph node dissection is still controversial at present. Therefore, a new predictive model is urgently needed to judge the risk of lymph node metastasis and guide clinical decision making before operation. Method: We retrospectively collected the data of 189 patients who underwent retroperitoneal lymph node dissection or enlarged lymph node resection due to suspected lymph node metastasis or enlarged lymph nodes found during an operation in Tongji Hospital from January 2016 to October 2021. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (lasso) regression analyses were used to identify preoperative predictors of pathological lymph node positivity. A nomogram was established to predict the probability of lymph node metastasis in patients with RCC before surgery according to the above independent predictors, and its efficacy was evaluated with a calibration curve and a DCA analysis. Result: Among the 189 patients, 54 (28.60%) were pN1 patients, and 135 (71.40%) were pN0 patients. Three independent impact factors were, finally, identified, which were the following: age (OR = 0.3769, 95% CI = 0.1864−0.7622, p < 0.01), lymph node size according to pre-operative imaging (10−20 mm: OR = 15.0040, 95% CI = 1.5666−143.7000, p < 0.05; >20 mm: OR = 4.4013, 95% CI = 1.4892−7.3134, p < 0.01) and clinical T stage (cT1−2 vs. cT3−4) (OR = 3.1641, 95% CI = 1.0336−9.6860, p < 0.05). The calibration curve and DCA (Decision Curve Analysis) showed the nomogram of this predictive model had good fitting. Conclusions: Low age, large lymph node size in pre-operative imaging and high clinical T stage can be used as independent predictive factors of pathological lymph node metastasis in patients with RCC. Our predictive nomogram using these factors exhibited excellent discrimination and calibration.

TFEB-associated renal cell carcinoma: A case report and literature review

RATIONALE

TFEB-associated renal cell carcinoma is very rare and belongs to the microphthalmia - associated transcription family translocation renal cell carcinoma.

PATIENT CONCERNS

Hospitalized for fever, a 29-year-old male patient had a left kidney lesion without any additional discomfort.

DIAGNOSES

Histopathological and immunohistochemical results were corresponding with TFEB renall cell carcinoma features.

INTERVENTIONS

Surgical resection of the tumor was performed.

OUTCOMES

After 8 months of follow-up, no tumor recurrence was observed.

LESSONS

TFEB-associated renal cell carcinoma is rare. The diagnosis is explicit. However, the optimal treatment needs to be further explored.

Proteogenomic characterization of MiT family translocation renal cell carcinoma

Microphthalmia transcription factor (MiT) family translocation renal cell carcinoma (tRCC) is a rare type of kidney cancer, which is not well characterized. Here we show the comprehensive proteogenomic analysis of tRCC tumors and normal adjacent tissues to elucidate the molecular landscape of this disease. Our study reveals that defective DNA repair plays an important role in tRCC carcinogenesis and progression. Metabolic processes are markedly dysregulated at both the mRNA and protein levels. Proteomic and phosphoproteome data identify mTOR signaling pathway as a potential therapeutic target. Moreover, molecular subtyping and immune infiltration analysis characterize the inter-tumoral heterogeneity of tRCC. Multi-omic integration reveals the dysregulation of cellular processes affected by genomic alterations, including oxidative phosphorylation, autophagy, transcription factor activity, and proteasome function. This study represents a comprehensive proteogenomic analysis of tRCC, providing valuable insights into its biological mechanisms, disease diagnosis, and prognostication.

Contemporary Clinical Definitions, Differential Diagnosis, and Novel Predictive Tools for Renal Cell Carcinoma

Despite significant progress regarding clinical detection/imaging evaluation modalities and genetic/molecular characterization of pathogenesis, advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains an incurable disease and overall RCC mortality has been steadily rising for decades. Concomitantly, clinical definitions have been greatly nuanced and refined. RCCs are currently viewed as a heterogeneous series of cancers, with the same anatomical origin, but fundamentally different metabolisms and clinical behaviors. Thus, RCC pathological diagnosis/subtyping guidelines have become increasingly intricate and cumbersome, routinely requiring ancillary studies, mainly immunohistochemistry. Meanwhile, RCC-associated-antigen targeted systemic therapy has been greatly diversified and emerging, novel clinical applications for RCC immunotherapy have already reported significant survival benefits, at least in the adjuvant setting. Even so, systemically disseminated RCCs still associate very poor clinical outcomes, with currently available therapeutic modalities only being able to prolong survival. In lack of a definitive cure for advanced RCCs, integration of the amounting scientific knowledge regarding RCC pathogenesis into RCC clinical management has been paramount for improving patient outcomes. The current review aims to offer an integrative perspective regarding contemporary RCC clinical definitions, proper RCC clinical work-up at initial diagnosis (semiology and multimodal imaging), RCC pathological evaluation, differential diagnosis/subtyping protocols, and novel clinical tools for RCC screening, risk stratification and therapeutic response prediction.

Epidemiology of Renal Cell Carcinoma: 2022 Update

CONTEXT

International variations in the rates of kidney cancer (KC) are considerable. An understanding of the risk factors for KC development is necessary to generate opportunities to reduce its incidence through prevention and surveillance.

OBJECTIVE

To retrieve and summarize global incidence and mortality rates of KC and risk factors associated with its development, and to describe known familial syndromes and genetic alterations that represent biologic risk factors.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic review was conducted via Medline (PubMed) and Scopus to include meta-analyses, reviews, and original studies regarding renal cell carcinoma, epidemiology, and risk factors.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Our narrative review provides a detailed analysis of KC incidence and mortality, with significant variations across time, geography, and sex. In particular, while KC incidence has continued to increase, mortality models have leveled off. Among the many risk factors, hypertension, obesity, and smoking are the most well established. The emergence of new genetic data coupled with observational data allows for integrated management and surveillance strategies for KC care.

CONCLUSIONS

KC incidence and mortality rates vary significantly by geography, sex, and age. Associations of the development of KC with modifiable and fixed risk factors such as obesity, hypertension, smoking, and chronic kidney disease (CKD)/end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) are well described. Recent advances in the genetic characterization of these cancers have led to a better understanding of the germline and somatic mutations that predispose patients to KC development, with potential for identification of therapeutic targets that may improve outcomes for these at-risk patients.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We reviewed evidence on the occurrence of kidney cancer (KC) around the world. Currently, the main avoidable causes are smoking, obesity, and high blood pressure. Although other risk factors also contribute, prevention and treatment of these three factors provide the best opportunities to reduce the risk of developing KC at present.

Clinicopathological features and prognosis of TFE3-positive renal cell carcinoma

Background

This study aimed to investigate the expression profile of TFE3 in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and the clinicopathological features as well as prognosis of TFE3-positive RCC.

Methods

Tissue sections from 796 patients with RCC were collected for immunohistochemical staining of TFE3. Molecular TFE3 rearrangement tests were also carried out on the TFE3-positive RCCs using fluorescence in situ hybridization and RNA-sequencing assays. Both clinicopathological features and follow-up information were collected for further analysis.

Results

The present study showed that 91 patients with RCC (91/796, 11.4%) were TFE3 positive expression but only 31 (31/91, 34.1%) of the patients were diagnosed with Xp11.2 translocation RCC. Further, it was found that the patients with TFE3-positive RCCs were more likely to develop lymph node and distant metastasis at diagnosis as well as presented a significantly higher WHO/ISUP nuclear grade and AJCC stage as compared with patients with TFE3-negative RCCs (p<0.01). Results of univariate and multivariate analyses showed that TFE3 positive expression was an independent prognostic factor associated with poor progression-free survival. Further, the findings of survival analysis showed that patients with positive TFE3 expression showed a shorter progression-free survival as compared with the patients with negative expression of TFE3 (p<0.001). In addition, results of the survival analysis found that there was no significant difference in progression-free survival between the Xp11.2 translocation RCC and TFE3-positive non-Xp11.2 translocation RCC groups (p=0.9607).

Conclusion

This study found that nuclear TFE3 expression is not specific to the Xp11.2 translocation RCC. Moreover, the positive TFE3 expression is associated with tumor progression and poor prognosis in patients with RCC irrespective of the presence of TFE3 translocation.

Case Report: Clinical complete response of advanced renal cell carcinoma associated with Xp11.2 translocation/TFE3 gene fusion by treated by camrelizumab and axitinib: A rare case report

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) associated with Xp11.2 translocation/TFE3 gene fusions is a rare subtype of renal tumor. This entity predominantly occurs in juveniles, but rarely in adults. Xp11.2 translocation RCC (tRCC) patients with lymph node or organ metastasis are associated with poor prognosis, and the strategy remains controversial. Herein, we presented our experience with the diagnosis and treatment of an adult case of Xp11.2 tRCC. In our clinical practice, a 32-year-old male manifested fever and right flank paroxysmal blunt pain, and computed tomography showed an inhomogeneous mass, 6 cm in diameter, in the right kidney. Then right partial nephrectomy (PN) and renal hilar lymph node dissection by laparoscopic surgery were performed. Pathology revealed that the tumor cells were positive for TFE3 immunohistologically and positive for TFE3 break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridization assay. A splice site mutation c.1544-1G>T of protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor delta (PTPRD) was detected by next-generation sequencing and weak PTPRD expression was confirmed in tumor tissues compared to tumor periphery. This patient was diagnosed with stage III RCC and received immune checkpoint inhibitor (camrelizumab) in combination with tyrosine kinase inhibitor (axitinib) treatment for 1 year. He achieved a clinical complete response with no sign of recurrence or metastasis. PTPRD mutation might be a favorable indicator for Xp11.2 tRCC patients managed by PN and followed by the adjuvant therapy of immune checkpoint inhibitor and tyrosine kinase inhibitor.

MiTF/TFE Translocation Renal Cell Carcinomas: From Clinical Entities to Molecular Insights

MiTF/TFE translocation renal cell carcinoma (tRCC) is a rare and aggressive subtype of RCC representing the most prevalent RCC in the pediatric population (up to 40%) and making up 4% of all RCCs in adults. It is characterized by translocations involving either TFE3 (TFE3-tRCC), TFEB (TFEB-tRCC) or MITF, all members of the MIT family (microphthalmia-associated transcriptional factor). TFE3-tRCC was first recognized in the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of kidney cancers in 2004. In contrast to TFEB-tRCC, TFE3-tRCC is associated with many partners that can be detected by RNA or exome sequencing. Both diagnoses of TFE3 and TFEB-tRCC are performed on morphological and immunohistochemical features, but, to date, TFE break-apart fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) remains the gold standard for diagnosis. The clinical behavior of tRCC is heterogeneous and more aggressive in adults. Management of metastatic tRCC is challenging, especially in the younger population, and data are scarce. Efficacy of the standard of care-targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors remains low. Recent integrative exome and RNA sequencing analyses have provided a better understanding of the biological heterogeneity, which can contribute to a better therapeutic approach. We describe the clinico-pathological entities, the response to systemic therapy and the molecular features and techniques used to diagnose tRCC.

Comprehensive study of 9 novel cases of TFEB-amplified renal cell carcinoma: an aggressive tumor with frequent PDL1 expression

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES

First described in 2014, renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with TFEB amplification (6p21) is a rare molecular subgroup whose diagnosis is challenging. The prognosis and therapeutic implications remain unclear.

METHODS

We report here the clinical, histological, immunohistochemical and genetic features of 9 novel cases. The pathological and immunohistochemical features were centrally reviewed by expert uropathologists. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) confirmed the diagnosis and comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) was performed to determine quantitative genomic alterations. We also performed an exhaustive review of the literature and compiled our data.

RESULTS

TFEB-amplified RCC were locally advanced with initial lymph node involvement in one case and liver metastasis in another case. They were high-grade eosinophilic tumors with papillary/pseudopapillary architecture, frequent positivity for melanocytic markers and frequent PDL1 expression. FISH demonstrated high-level TFEB amplification in 6 cases. One case showed concomitant TFEB translocation. CGH analysis identified complex alterations with frequent losses of 1p, 2q, 3p, 6p, and frequent 6p and 8q gains. VEGFA co-amplification was identified in all cases with a lower level than TFEB. The prognosis was poor with five patients having lymph node or distant metastases.

CONCLUSION

TFEB-amplified RCC is a rare molecular subgroup with variable morphology whose diagnosis is confirmed by FISH analysis. The complex alterations identified by CGH are consistent with an aggressive clinical behavior. The co-amplification of VEGFA and the expression of PDL1 could suggest a potential benefit from antiangiogenics and targeted immunotherapy in combination for these aggressive tumors.

Both SUMOylation and ubiquitination of TFE3 fusion protein regulated by androgen receptor are the potential target in the therapy of Xp11.2 translocation renal cell carcinoma

Background

The aggressiveness of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) associated with Xp11.2 translocation/TFE3 gene fusion (Xp11.2 translocation RCC [Xp11.2 tRCC]) is age‐dependent, which is similar to the overall trend of reproductive endocrine hormones. Therefore, this study focused on the effect and potential mechanism of androgen and androgen receptor (AR) on the progression of Xp11.2 tRCC.

Methods

The effects of androgen and AR on the proliferation and migration of Xp11.2 tRCC cells were first evaluated utilising Xp11.2 tRCC cell lines and tissues. Because Transcription factor enhancer 3 (TFE3) fusion proteins play a key role in Xp11.2 tRCC, we focused on the regulatory role of AR and TFE3 expression and transcriptional activity.

Results

When Xp11.2 tRCC cells were treated with dihydrotestosterone, increased cell proliferation, invasion and migration were observed. Compared with clear cell RCC, the positive rate of AR in Xp11.2 tRCC tissues was higher, and its expression was negatively associated with the progression‐free survival of Xp11.2 tRCC. Further studies revealed that AR could positively regulate the transcriptional activity of TFE3 fusion proteins by small ubiquitin‐related modifier (SUMO)‐specific protease 1, inducing the deSUMOylation of TFE3 fusion. On the other hand, UCHL1 negatively regulated by AR plays a role in the deubiquitination degradation of the PRCC‐TFE3 fusion protein. Therefore, the combination of the AR inhibitor MDV3100 and the UCHL1 inhibitor 6RK73 was effective in delaying the progression of Xp11.2 tRCC, especially PRCC‐TFE3 tRCC.

Conclusions

Androgen and AR function as facilitators in Xp11.2 tRCC progression and may be a novel therapeutic target for Xp11.2 tRCC.

The combined use of AR antagonist MDV3100 and UCHL1 inhibitor 6RK73 increased both the SUMOylation and ubiquitination of the PRCC‐TFE3 fusion protein

The genomic landscape of pediatric renal cell carcinomas

Pediatric renal cell carcinomas (RCC) differ from their adult counterparts not only in histologic subtypes but also in clinical characteristics and outcome. However, the underlying biology is still largely unclear. For this reason, we performed whole-exome and transcriptome sequencing analyses on a cohort of 25 pediatric RCC patients with various histologic subtypes, including 10 MiT family translocation (MiT) and 10 papillary RCCs. In this cohort of pediatric RCC, we find only limited genomic overlap with adult RCC, even within the same histologic subtype. Recurrent somatic mutations in genes not previously reported in RCC were detected, such as in CCDC168, PLEKHA1, VWF, and MAP3K9. Our papillary pediatric RCCs, which represent the largest cohort to date with comprehensive molecular profiling in this age group, appeared as a distinct genomic subtype differing in terms of gene mutations and gene expression patterns not only from MiT-RCC but also from their adult counterparts.

•

WES and RNA-seq of 25 pediatric RCCs with various histologic subtypes

•

Detected only limited genomic overlap with adult RCC

•

Revealed recurrent somatic mutations in genes not previously reported in RCC

•

Discovery of a CRK-PITPNA fusion gene in a pediatric papillary RCC

Eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma and renal cell carcinomas with TFEB alterations: a comparative study

AIMS

Eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma (ESC RCC) is a recently described renal tumour entity with frequent CK20 positivity, commonly harbouring TSC mutations. In contrast, frequency of CK20 expression and presence of TSC mutations are unclear in TFEB-amplified RCC and TFEB-translocated RCC, which frequently express Melan A. Herein, we provide a comparative analysis of 6 ESC RCC with 4 TFEB-amplified/translocated RCC.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We assessed the frequency of CK20 and Melan A expression by immunohistochemistry, and of TSC mutations by next generation sequencing. TFEB alterations were confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). All tumours showed voluminous eosinophilic cells with granular cytoplasm, prominent nucleoli, and most showed admixture of solid and cystic areas. CK20 expression was found in all 6 ESC RCC and in all RCCs with TFEB alterations. Melan A positivity was identified in 5/6 ESC RCC and 4/4 RCC with TFEB alterations. We found TSC mutations in 2 ESC RCCs, including in one case also harbouring a CIC fusion, and identified a TSC mutation in one TFEB-amplified RCC.

CONCLUSIONS

ESC RCC represents an emerging renal tumour entity with some histological, immunohistochemical and molecular overlap to TFEB-amplified/translocated RCC. FISH for TFEB aids in this differential diagnosis in challenging cases.

A review of neoplasms with MITF/MiT family translocations

Microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF/MiT) family is a group of basic helix-loop-helix leucine zipper (bHLH-LZ) transcription factors including TFE3 (TFEA), TFEB, TFEC and MITF. The first renal neoplasms involving MITF family translocation were renal cell carcinomas with chromosome translocations involving ASPL-TFE3/t(X;17)(p11.23;q25) or MALAT1-TFEB/t(6;11)(p21.1;q12), and now it is known as MiT family translocation RCC in 2016 WHO classification. Translocations involving MITF family genes also are found in other tumor types, such as perivascular epithelioid cell neoplasm (PEComa), Alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS), epithelioid hemangioendothelioma, ossifying fibromyxoid tumor (OFMT), and clear cell tumor with melanocytic differentiation and ACTIN-MITF translocation. In this review, we summarize the features of different types of neoplasms with MITF family translocations.

Clinicopathological features of non-conventional renal cell carcinoma histological subtypes: Learning points from a large contemporary series spanning over three decades

Purpose

To perform a retrospective review of the clinicopathological features of patients with conventional and non-conventional renal cell carcinoma (cRCC and ncRCC).

Materials and Methods

A large prospectively maintained uro-oncological registry was accessed to extract clinicopathological data of patients diagnosed with renal tumors who subsequently underwent nephrectomy from 1990–2019. Demographics and operative parameters were extracted. Analyses of overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were performed using the Kaplan–Meier method. Cox proportional-hazards analysis was used to identify risk factors which influenced survival.

Results

There were a total of 1,686 consecutive nephrectomies which was retrieved, with 1,286 cRCC and 400 ncRCC. The commonest ncRCC subtypes were papillary (n=198, 11.7%), clear cell papillary (n=50, 3.0%) and chromophobe (n=49, 2.9%) RCC. Kaplan–Meier estimates of OS were higher in cRCC (0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71–0.78) than ncRCC (hazard ratio, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.16–1.87). Among individual subtypes, chromophobe RCC had the highest 5-year OS (0.90; 95% CI, 0.79–1.0). Among ncRCC subtypes, acquired cystic RCC demonstrated the highest association with end-stage renal failure and hypertension, with the highest CSS. MiT family translocation RCC had the youngest mean age at presentation (45.6±12.8 y) and excellent CSS. Factors associated with increased OS in the entire cohort included shorter operative time, partial nephrectomy and lower tumor stages.

Conclusions

This study provides a comprehensive contemporary overview of ncRCCs which are yet poorly characterized, in comparison to cRCCs. Data from this study would contribute towards tailored patient counseling and healthcare resource planning.

The Latinx Disparity in Surgery for Kidney Cancer: Data from The South Texas Region

The South Texas region, with a predominantly Latinx population, has a very high incidence of renal cell carcinoma (RCC), including those with tumor extending into the major blood vessels called venous tumor thrombus (VTT). There is currently no data on outcomes of Latinx patients with VTT as most published studies are from predominantly Caucasian population. Therefore, we performed this study to fill an urgent, unmet need. We reviewed patients who underwent radical nephrectomy with removal of VTT (called tumor thrombectomy) between 2015 and 2020. We collected data on demographics, clinical, pathological characteristics and outcomes of patients. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate the associations between ethnicity and disease progression or survival. We identified 112 patients, of which 67 (62%) were Latinx, and 41 (38%) were non-Latinx. Approximately 60% of patients had Level II-IV VTT; Latinx presented with a higher level of tumor thrombus (p=0.046). Latinx patients had a higher rate of no insurance (11% vs. 27%, p=0.04) and were more likely to lost to follow-up after surgery (22.4% vs. 13.3%, p=0.23) compared to non-Latinx. Fewer Latinx received systemic therapy (28% vs. 42%; p=0.13). Ninety-day mortality for the entire cohort was 3.8%. The Latinx population in the South Texas region present late, with advanced thrombus level, and do not have access to systemic therapy. Given symptomatic disease, surgical treatment, if feasible, is their only option. Our results highlight disparate treatment patterns which require further investigation and health-care policy changes.

WHO 2022 Classification of Kidney Tumors: what is relevant? An update and future novelties for the pathologist

Classification systems reflect our technical abilities in the investigation of tumors and our current theories on tumor development. Herein, by providing a historical perspective on the evolution of classifying renal tumors, we assess the current WHO classification highlighting the novelties and the implications of these changes in daily clinical practice.

Gene Expression Analysis of Aggressive Adult Xp11.2 Translocation Renal Cell Carcinoma at Clinical Stage T1N0M0 to Identify Potential Prognostic and Therapeutic Biomarkers

Xp11.2 translocation renal cell carcinoma (tRCC), involving transcription factor E3 (TFE3) gene fusions, is a rare and aggressive RCC variant when present in adults and has been recently recognized as a unique entity in RCC. Biomarkers and treatment guidelines do not exist for patients with aggressive Xp11.2 tRCC. The aim was to identify and evaluate therapeutic biomarkers for aggressive Xp11.2 tRCC. RNA sequencing was performed using formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues from 11 adult patients with clinical T1N0M0 Xp11.2 tRCC, including three patients with aggressive characteristics (recurrence or cancer-specific death after nephrectomy). Thirty genes were differentially expressed between the aggressive and non-aggressive groups, even after adjustment, and were associated with KEGG pathways related to the aggressiveness of Xp11.2 tRCC. PIK3R2, involved in various KEGG pathways, including the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway, was overexpressed in the Xp11.2 tRCC cell lines UOK120 and UOK146. The PI3K pathway inhibitor LY294002 showed a significant therapeutic benefit. This study provides the first candidate biomarker, PIK3R2, for aggressive clinical T1N0M0 Xp11.2 tRCC. Furthermore, this study is the first to recommend a targeted drug, LY294002, for aggressive Xp11.2 tRCC based on the molecular pathophysiology.

Case Report: TFE3 Positive Xp11.2 Translocation Renal Cell Carcinoma (TRCC) – A Case Study and Review of the Literature

Microphthalmia-associated transcription factor renal cell cancer, also known as translocation renal cell cancer, belongs to the group of extremely rare non-clear-cell kidney neoplasms. Their incidence is lower in adulthood than in childhood. The only known risk factor for the development of this tumor is prior chemotherapy. In the operable stage of the disease, the prognosis depends on the status of regional lymph nodes. Interestingly lymph node positivity worsens the prognosis only in the adult patient population. Radical surgical excision is the best therapy in the early stage. The optimal treatment strategy for locally advanced and metastatic disease has not been established, given the lack of evidence in such a rare disease. We present the case of a patient with an aggressive course of this neoplasm treated with temsirolimus, who achieved 10-month control of this neoplasm accompanied by a discussion on other therapeutic possibilities.

Integrative clinical and molecular characterization of translocation renal cell carcinoma

Translocation renal cell carcinoma (tRCC) is a poorly characterized subtype of kidney cancer driven by MiT/TFE gene fusions. Here, we define the landmarks of tRCC through an integrative analysis of 152 patients with tRCC identified across genomic, clinical trial, and retrospective cohorts. Most tRCCs harbor few somatic alterations apart from MiT/TFE fusions and homozygous deletions at chromosome 9p21.3 (19.2% of cases). Transcriptionally, tRCCs display a heightened NRF2-driven antioxidant response that is associated with resistance to targeted therapies. Consistently, we find that outcomes for patients with tRCC treated with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitors (VEGFR-TKIs) are worse than those treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Using multiparametric immunofluorescence, we find that the tumors are infiltrated with CD8⁺ T cells, though the T cells harbor an exhaustion immunophenotype distinct from that of clear cell RCC. Our findings comprehensively define the clinical and molecular features of tRCC and may inspire new therapeutic hypotheses.

TFE3 and TFEB-rearranged renal cell carcinomas: an immunohistochemical panel to differentiate from common renal cell neoplasms

TFE3/TFEB-rearranged renal cell carcinomas are characterized by translocations involving TFE3 and TFEB genes. Despite the initial description of typical morphology, their histological spectrum is wide, mimicking common subtypes of renal cell tumors. Thus, the diagnosis is challenging requiring the demonstration of the gene rearrangement, usually by FISH. However, this technique is limited in most laboratories and immunohistochemical TFE3/TFEB analysis is inconsistent. We sought to identify a useful immunohistochemical panel using the most common available markers to recognize those tumors. We performed an immunohistochemical panel comparing 27 TFE3-rearranged and 10 TFEB-rearranged renal cell carcinomas to the most common renal cell tumors (150 clear cell, 100 papillary, 50 chromophobe renal cell carcinomas, 18 clear cell papillary renal cell tumors, and 50 oncocytomas). When dealing with neoplasms characterized by cells with clear cytoplasm, CA9 is a helpful marker to exclude clear cell renal cell carcinoma. GATA3, AMACR, and CK7 are useful to rule out clear cell papillary renal cell tumor. CK7 is negative in TFE3/TFEB-rearranged renal cell carcinoma and positive in papillary renal cell carcinoma, being therefore useful in this setting. Parvalbumin and CK7/S100A1 respectively are of paramount importance when TFE3/TFEB-rearranged renal cell carcinoma resembles oncocytoma and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. Moreover, in TFEB-rearranged renal cell carcinoma, cathepsin K and melanogenesis markers are constantly positive, whereas TFE3-rearranged renal cell carcinoma stains for cathepsin K in roughly half of the cases, HMB45 in 8% and Melan-A in 22%. In conclusion, since TFE3/TFEB-rearranged renal cell carcinoma may mimic several histotypes, an immunohistochemical panel to differentiate them from common renal cell tumors should include cathepsin K, CA9, CK7, and parvalbumin.

Estradiol increases risk of topoisomerase IIβ-mediated DNA strand breaks to initiate Xp11.2 translocation renal cell carcinoma

Background

Xp11.2 translocation renal cell carcinoma (tRCC) is defined by translocation of the transcription factor E3 (TFE3) gene located on chromosome Xp11.2. Due to the high incidence in women, 17β-estradiol (E2) may be a factor influencing TFE3 breaks, and the topoisomerase II (TOP2) poison is considered one of the important risk factors in mediating DNA breaks. In this study, we investigated the potential pathogenesis of Xp11.2 tRCC using the renal epithelial cell line HK-2.

Methods

Immunofluorescence assay was performed to analyze DNA breaks by quantifying phosphorylation of H2AX (γH2AX), and the micronuclei (MN) assay was designed for monitoring chromosome breaks. The chromatin immunoprecipitation (CHIP) was used to detect whether proteins bound to specific DNA site, and the co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) was used to confirm whether proteins bound to other proteins. In some experiments, siRNA and shRNA were transfected to knockdown target genes.

Results

Our results demonstrated that DNA double-strand breaks were mediated by TOP2β in HK-2 cells, and this process could be amplified through estrogen receptor α (ERα)-dependent pathway induced by E2. After performing translocation site analysis using target region sequencing data in two Xp11.2 tRCC cell lines and ten Xp11.2 tRCC patients, we confirmed that TOP2β and ERα could both bind to TFE3 translocation sites directly to mediate DNA breaks in a E2-dependent manner. However, TOP2β and ERα were not observed to have direct interaction, indicating that their collaborative may be implemented in other ways. Besides, TFE3 was found to be upregulated through NRF1 with increasing E2 concentration, which could increase the risk of TFE3 breaks.

Conclusion

Our results indicate that E2 amplifies TOP2β-mediated TFE3 breaks by ERα-dependent pathway, and E2 upregulates TFE3 by NRF1 to increase the risk of TFE3 breaks. This suggests that E2 is an important pathogenic factor for Xp11.2 tRCC pathogenesis.

Diagnostic utility of one-stop fusion gene panel to detect TFE3/TFEB gene rearrangement and amplification in renal cell carcinomas

MiT family translocation renal cell carcinoma (MiT-RCC) harbors translocations involving the TFE3 or TFEB genes. RCC with TFEB amplification is also identified and is associated with a more aggressive clinical course. Accurate diagnosis of MiT-RCC is crucial for patient management. In this study, we evaluated the performance of the Archer FusionPlex assay for detection of MiT-RCC with TFE3 or TFEB translocations and TFEB amplifications. RNA was extracted from 49 RCC FFPE tissue samples with known TFE3/TFEB status (26 TFE3 FISH positive, 12 TFEB FISH positive, 4 TFEB amplified (1 case both split and amplified), and 8 FISH negative) using the Covaris extraction kit. Target enriched cDNA libraries were prepared using the Archer FusionPlex kit and sequenced on the Illumina NextSeq 550. We demonstrate that the age of the specimen, quality of RNA, and sequencing metrics are important for fusion detection. Fusions were identified in 20 of 21 cases less than 2 years old, and TFE3/TFEB rearrangements were detected in all cases with Fusion QC ≥ 100. The assay identified intrachromosomal inversions in two cases (TFE3-RBM10 and NONO-TFE3), usually difficult to identify by FISH assays. TFEB mRNA expression and the TFEB/TFE3 mRNA expression ratio were significantly higher in RCCs with TFEB fusion and TFEB gene amplification compared to tumors without TFEB fusion or amplification. A cutoff TFEB/TFE3 ratio of 0.5 resulted in 97.3% concordance to FISH results with no false negatives. Our study demonstrates that the FusionPlex assay successfully identifies TFE3 and TFEB fusions including intrachromosomal inversions. Age of the specimen and certain sequencing metrics are important for successful fusion detection. Furthermore, mRNA expression levels may be used for predicting cases harboring TFEB amplification, thereby streamlining testing. This assay enables accurate molecular detection of multiple subtypes of MiT-RCCs in a convenient workflow.

t(6; 11) renal cell carcinoma. A case report successfully diagnosed by using fluorescence in situ hybridization

INTRODUCTION

Definitive diagnosis of translocation renal cell carcinoma is challenging. We herein experienced a case of translocation(6;11) renal cell carcinoma, successfully diagnosed by using fluorescence in situ hybridization.

CASE PRESENTATION

During the follow-up of a 21-year-old man with Crohn's disease, computed tomography revealed a 40-mm mass in the right kidney. Since imaging could not exclude malignancy, needle biopsy was performed. The histological diagnosis from the biopsy specimen was renal cell carcinoma, but histological typing had not been done adequately. A laparoscopic partial nephrectomy was then performed. Transcription factor EB immunoreactivity was positive, transcription factor EB rearrangement was shown by break apart and fusion fluorescence in situ hybridization. As a result, a definitive diagnosis of t(6; 11) renal cell carcinoma was made. There has been no recurrence for 5 years.

CONCLUSION

Transcription factor EB immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization are useful diagnostic tools for renal tumors of young generation.

Long survival of a young patient with Xp11.2 translocation metastatic clear cell renal carcinoma: case report

INTRODUCTION

Xp11.2 translocation is a rare subtype of renal cell carcinoma (RCC), identified as a single entity only from 2004 by World Health Organization (WHO). These tumors involve pediatric age group and rarely patients over 40 years old. Children show indolent disease; adult population has invasive tumor at diagnosis with rapid progression.

CASE REPORT

We describe a case report of a young woman affected by metastatic clear cell renal carcinoma with Xp11.2 translocation. She achieved a longer stable disease (SD) to first line treatment with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, obtaining a progression free survival (PFS) of 21 months. After she received cabozantinib, sunitinib and then sorafenib.

CONCLUSIONS

The patient had an overall survival (OS) of 51 months, which is much higher than that reported in literature data. Unfortunately, the biology of Xp11.2 translocation RCC and its therapeutic management are still unclear.