ESC, ALK, HOT and LOT: Three Letter Acronyms of Emerging Renal Entities Knocking on the Door of the WHO Classification

Genotype Phenotype Correlation of Renal Tumors in the Cancer Genome Atlas Database

Morphological features are critical in evaluation of renal tumors and directing molecular workup. The objective of this study was to review histomorphology of renal tumors with molecular alterations of known subtypes. Renal tumors in The Cancer Genome Atlas were reviewed to identify tumors with defining molecular alterations. Single representative digital slides and pathology reports were reviewed and morphologic features recorded. Sixty tumors were identified with molecular alterations in genes characteristic of defined renal cell carcinoma (RCC) subtypes. Findings included the presence of both low- and high-grade histology in TFE3 rearranged RCCs, TFEB amplified RCCs, succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) mutated RCCs and RCCs with mutations in mismatch repair genes. Three ELOC mutated RCCs were identified, one of which demonstrated infiltrative features. Pseudostratification of nuclei in fumarate hydratase mutated RCCs and nuclear grooves in SDH mutated RCCs were intriguing findings not previously reported. Mucinous features were noted in NF2, KRAS, and SDH mutated and ALK rearranged tumors. Significant morphologic overlap was noted across most categories with limited clues for subclassification. Whereas the number of diagnostic entities for kidney tumors continues to increase, many of these have overlapping features, highlighting the significant role molecular characterization currently plays and will continue to play in the future.

Frequency and clinicopathologic features of renal low-grade oncocytic tumour and eosinophilic vacuolated tumour: reclassification of 605 eosinophilic tumours including patients managed with active surveillance

AIMS

Low-grade oncocytic tumour (LOT) and eosinophilic vacuolated tumour (EVT) are recently described emerging entities, which demonstrate distinct features but are not yet recognised as separate neoplasms in the fifth WHO classification. Published series to date have been largely multi-institutional and based on surgically resected tumours. This study aims to determine the frequency, clinicopathologic features and outcome of LOT and EVT in a single institutional series of oncocytic/eosinophilic renal neoplasms, including patients managed with active surveillance and non-surgical intervention.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Cases were identified from a consecutive institutional series of in-house renal tumours diagnosed on biopsy and/or nephrectomy (2003-2023). Tumours with a diagnosis or differential diagnosis of oncocytoma, chromophobe renal cell carcinoma or oncocytic neoplasm not otherwise specified (including LOT, EVT and tumours with overlapping hybrid features) were retrospectively reviewed and classified/reclassified.In total, 605 oncocytic/eosinophilic renal neoplasms were reviewed, among which 33 LOT (5.5%) and 5 EVT (0.8%) were identified. LOT were CK7+, CD117- and GATA3+ (94%). EVT were CD117+, CK7 focal+ (80%) and cathepsin K+ (80%). At the median follow-up of 34 months (range 2-253) and 56 months (range 8-90) for LOT and EVT, respectively, there was no evidence of recurrence following ablation/surgical resection, metastasis or death from disease for all patients, including the 22 managed with active surveillance (20 LOT and 2 EVT).

CONCLUSIONS

LOT and EVT comprised a minority of oncocytic renal neoplasms in this series. We report a large institutional series including patients managed non-surgically, with no adverse outcome, adding to the existing literature indicating a benign outcome.

Renal mass biopsy - a practical and clinicopathologically relevant approach to diagnosis

Advancements in imaging modalities have increased the frequency of renal mass discovery. Imaging has typically been considered sufficient to guide management for a large proportion of these tumours, but renal mass biopsies (RMBs) have an increasing role in determining malignancy and can be a valuable tool for preventing unnecessary surgery in patients with benign tumours. A structured approach should be used to help to navigate the expanding repertoire of renal tumours, many of which are molecularly defined. In terms of tumour subtyping, the pathologist's strategy should focus on stratifying patients into clinically different prognostic groups according to our current knowledge of tumour behaviour, including benign, low-grade or indolent, intermediate malignant or highly aggressive. Crucial pathological features and morphological mimicry of tumours can alter the tumour's prognostic group. Thus, pathologists and urologists can use RMB to select patients with tumours at a reduced risk of progression, which can be safely managed with active surveillance within a tailored imaging schedule, versus tumours for which ablation or surgical intervention is indicated. RMB is also crucial in the oncological setting to distinguish between different high-grade tumours and guide tailored management strategies.

ALK-Rearranged Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Multi-Institutional Study of 9 Cases With Expanding the Morphologic and Molecular Genetic Spectrum

ALK-rearranged renal cell carcinoma (ALK-RCC) is rare, molecularly defined RCC subtype in the recently published fifth edition of World Health Organization classification of tumors. In this study, we described 9 ALK-RCCs from a clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic aspect, supporting and extending upon the observations by previous studies regarding this rare subgroup of RCC. There were 6 male and 3 female patients with ages ranging from 14 to 59 years (mean, 34.4 years). None of the patients had sickle cell trait. The diagnosis was based on radical or partial nephrectomy specimen for 8 patients and on biopsy specimen for 1. Tumor size ranged from 2.5 to 7.2 cm (mean, 2.8 cm). Follow-up was available for 6 of 9 patients (6-36 months); 5 had no tumor recurrence or metastasis and 1 developed lung metastasis at 24 months. The patient was subsequently treated with resection of the metastatic tumor followed by crizotinib-targeted therapy, and he was alive without tumor 12 months later. Histologically, the tumors showed a mixed growth of multiple patterns, including papillary, solid, tubular, tubulocystic, cribriform, and corded, often set in a mucinous background. The neoplastic cells had predominantly eosinophilic cytoplasm. Focally, clear cytoplasm with polarized nuclei and subnuclear vacuoles (n = 1), and pale foamy cytoplasm (n = 1) were observed on the tumor cells. The biopsied tumor showed solid growth of elongated tubules merging with bland spindle cells. Other common and uncommon features included psammomatous microcalcifications (n = 5), rhabdoid cells (n = 4), prominent intracytoplasmic vacuoles (n = 4), prominent chronic inflammatory infiltrate (n = 3), signet ring cell morphology (n = 2), and pleomorphic cells (n = 2). By immunohistochemistry, all 9 tumors were diffusely positive for ALK(5A4) and 4 of 8 tested cases showed reactivity for TFE3 protein. By fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis, ALK rearrangement was identified in all the 9 tumors; none of the tested tumors harbored TFE3 rearrangement (0/4) or gains of chromosomes 7 and 17 (0/3). ALK fusion partners were identified by RNA-sequencing in all 8 cases analyzed, including EML4 (n = 2), STRN (n = 1), TPM3 (n = 1), KIF5B (n = 1), HOOK1 (n = 1), SLIT1 (n = 1), and TPM1(3'UTR) (n = 1). Our study further expands the morphologic and molecular genetic spectrum of ALK-RCC.

Low-grade oncocytic tumor: a review of radiologic and clinical features

PURPOSE

The 2022 World Health Organization classification of renal neoplasia expanded the spectrum of oncocytic neoplasms to encompass newly established and emerging entities; one of the latter is the low-grade oncocytic tumor (LOT). This study reports the radiologic appearance and clinical behavior of LOT.

METHODS

In this IRB-approved, HIPPA-compliant retrospective study, our institution's pathology database was searched for low-grade oncocytic tumors or neoplasms. Patient age, gender, and comorbidities were obtained from a review of electronic medical records, and imaging characteristics of the tumors were assessed through an imaging platform.

RESULTS

The pathology database search yielded 14 tumors in 14 patients. Four patients were excluded, as radiologic images were not available in three, and one did not fulfill diagnostic criteria after pathology re-review. The resulting cohort consisted of 10 tumors (median diameter 2.3 cm, range 0.7-5.1) in 10 patients (median age 68 years, range 53-91, six women). All tumors presented as a solitary, well-circumscribed, mass with solid components. All enhanced as much or almost as much as adjacent renal parenchyma; all but one enhanced heterogeneously. None had lymphadenopathy, venous invasion, or metastatic disease at presentation or at clinical follow-up (median, 22.2 months, range 3.4-71.6). Among five tumors undergoing active surveillance, mean increase in size was 0.4 cm/year at imaging follow-up (median 16.7 months, range 8.9-25.4).

CONCLUSION

LOT, a recently described pathologic entity in the kidney, can be considered in the differential diagnosis of an avidly and typically heterogeneously enhancing solid renal mass in an adult patient.

Eosinophilic Solid and Cystic Renal Cell Carcinoma-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma (ESC-RCC) is a novel and uncommon type of renal cell carcinoma, which has been recently recognized and introduced as a distinct entity in the WHO 2022 kidney tumor classification. Previously known as "unclassified RCC", followed by "tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC)-associated RCC", ESC-RCC is now a distinct category of kidney tumor, with its own name, with specific clinical manifestations, and a unique morphological, immunohistochemical and molecular profile. Due to its recent introduction and the limited available data, the diagnosis of ESC-RCC is still a complex challenge, and it is probably frequently misdiagnosed. The secret of diagnosing this tumor lies in the pathologists' knowledge, and keeping it up to date through research, thereby limiting the use of outdated nomenclature. The aim of our case-based review is to provide a better understanding of this pathology and to enrich the literature with a new case report, which has some particularities compared to the existing cases.

Diagnostic Biomarkers in Renal Cell Tumors According to the Latest WHO Classification: A Focus on Selected New Entities

The fifth edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification for urogenital tumors, released in 2022, introduces some novelties in the chapter on renal epithelial tumors compared to the previous 2016 classification. Significant changes include the recognition of new disease entities and adjustments in the nomenclature for certain pathologies. Notably, each tumor entity now includes minimum essential and desirable criteria for reliable diagnosis. This classification highlights the importance of biological and molecular characterization alongside traditional cytological and architectural features. In this view, immunophenotyping through immunohistochemistry (IHC) plays a crucial role in bridging morphology and genetics. This article aims to present and discuss the role of key immunohistochemical markers that support the diagnosis of new entities recognized in the WHO classification, focusing on critical topics associated with single markers, in the context of specific tumors, such as the clear cell capillary renal cell tumor (CCPRCT), eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma (ESC-RCC), and so-called "other oncocytic tumors", namely the eosinophilic vacuolated tumor (EVT) and low-grade oncocytic tumor (LOT). Their distinctive characteristics and immunophenotypic profiles, along with insights regarding diagnostic challenges and the differential diagnosis of these tumors, are provided. This state-of-the-art review offers valuable insights in biomarkers associated with novel renal tumors, as well as a tool to implement diagnostic strategies in routine practice.

The WHO 2022 Classification of Renal Neoplasms (5th Edition): Salient Updates

The first categorization for renal tumours was made by the WHO in 1981 and included only renal cell carcinoma (RCC). After that, classification was continuously altered over five decades. The WHO 2022 Classification of Urinary and Male Genital Tumours 2022 (5th edition) is molecular-driven and contains major revisions compared to the earlier classification from 2016. This revised edition divided renal tumours into four major broad categories: clear cell renal tumours, papillary renal cell tumours, oncocytic and chromophobe renal tumours, and collecting duct tumours. 'Other renal tumours' and 'molecularly defined renal carcinomas' are two other categories that were also included. Transcription factor binding to IGHM enhancer 3 (TFE3)-rearranged, TFEB-altered, elongin C (ELOC)-mutated (formerly TCEB1)-mutated, fumarate hydratase (FH)-deficient, succinate dehydrogenase (SDH)-deficient, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearranged, and SWI/SNF-related matrix-associated actin-dependent regulator of chromatin subfamily B member 1 (SMARCB1)-deficient renal cell carcinomas are molecularly defined entities. Eosinophilic vacuolated tumours and low-grade oncocytic tumours are classified as emerging entities. Molecularly characterized renal tumours include those with SMARCB1 deficiencies, TFE3 rearrangements, TFEB alterations, ALK rearrangements, ELOC mutations, etc. Thyroid-like follicular carcinoma, eosinophilic vacuolated tumour, and low-grade oncocytic tumour are a few emerging entities of renal tumours. Improved therapy targets for each kidney tumour can be achieved using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and molecular definition updates. This study aims to highlight new developments in the WHO 2022 categorization of renal tumours with regard to diagnostic, morphological, molecular, IHC, clinical, and prognostic updates.

Actual encounters of the kidney kind: Exploring 48 cases of renal collision tumors through the lens of literature

Multiple tumors of different lineages merging into a single mass, termed collision tumors, are considered a rare phenomenon in the kidney. Tumor components, or partners, may be malignant (including metastatic disease), borderline, or benign. We report the largest cohort to date of 48 cases. The cases were identified from the archives of three institutions in the last 16 years, including 43 (90%) with 2 tumor partners (dyad) and 5 (10%) with 3 partners (triad), totaling 101 individual neoplasms. The majority of cases involved immunohistochemical workup, and 5 underwent FISH or molecular studies. Forty (83%) cases featured a malignant entity, including all triads. Twenty dyads and two triads were composed entirely of malignant tumors. The most common malignant partner was clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) (N = 19) followed by papillary RCC (N = 17). Nine (19%) cases featured borderline entities, including 5 multilocular cystic neoplasms of low malignant potential and 6 clear cell papillary renal cell tumors. Twenty one (44%) cases contained a benign partner, including 6 benign dyads. Papillary adenoma (N = 13) and oncocytoma (N = 8) were most common. Epithelial tumors were present in all 48 cases, and non-epithelial neoplasms in 9 cases (19%). Our cohort includes many novel combinations and collision partners with rare entities such as SDH-deficient RCC, TFE3-rearranged RCC, eosinophilic solid and cystic RCC, and acquired cystic disease associated RCC. A comprehensive literature review and analysis of collision tumor phenomenon in kidney placed these cases in context suggesting that collision tumors of the kidney are more common than previously recognized.

ALK-rearranged renal cell carcinoma (ALK-RCC): Evaluation of histomorphological and immunohistochemical features by analysis of 276 renal cell carcinoma cases in Turkey

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement-associated renal cell carcinoma (ALK-RCC) is characterized by ALK fusion at chromosome 2p23. It has recently been included as a recognized entity with the 5th edition of the WHO classification urinary and male genital tumor. However, our knowledge about ALK-RCC is limited due to the small number of reported cases. In our study, we aimed to contribute the histomorphological and immunohistochemical features of ALK-rearranged renal cell carcinoma cases. We reviewed 276 cases diagnosed as RCC in order to detect ALKRCCs.We used immunohistochemistry to screen ALK rearrangement and then confirmed the ALK rearrangement by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) method. ALK was immunohistochemically positive in 8 of 276 cases. ALK rearrangement was detected by FISH in 3 of 8 cases. These cases were previously diagnosed as clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CRCC), papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC), and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (ChRCC). Their histomorphological findings were diverse, and all three cases exhibited different immunohistochemical findings. Survival of these patients ranged between 6 and 24 months. ALK immunohistochemical findings were also different in each case as perinuclear, weak cytoplasmic, and membranous.ALK RCCs appear to be very rare tumors with heterogeneous histomorphological and immunohistochemical features. Although immunohistochemistry may be useful to detect ALK positivity, genetic evaluation is required to confirm the diagnosis. With identifying ALK-RCCs, ALK inhibitors, which are currently used in the treatment of lung adenocarcinomas, can be used as a targeted therapy option in ALK-RCCs.

Evaluation of an institutional series of low-grade oncocytic tumor (LOT) of the kidney and review of the mutational landscape of LOT

The 2022 WHO classification of urinary and male genital tumors introduced several novel kidney entities exhibiting eosinophilic/oncocytic features with specific mutational backgrounds. Thus, molecular techniques, such as next-generation sequencing (NGS), became more commonly used for their evaluation. We studied 12 low-grade oncocytic tumors (LOT) of the kidney (from 11 patients), identified in a cohort of 210 eosinophilic/oncocytic renal tumors, diagnosed in our institution between October 2019 and May 2023, which represented 5.7% (12/210) of all eosinophilic/oncocytic renal tumors during this period. We reviewed their clinicopathologic, histologic, and immunohistochemical features, as well as their mutational profiles. We also reviewed the literature on NGS-derived data of LOT, by selecting papers in which LOT diagnosis was rendered according to the criteria proposed initially. Median age was 65 years (mean: 63.5; range 43-79) and median tumor size was 2.0 cm (mean: 2.2; range: 0.9-3.1). All tumors were positive for PAX8, CK7, and GATA3, and negative or focally positive for CD117/KIT. We found the following gene mutations: MTOR ((6/11), 54.5%)), TSC1 ((2/11), 18.2%)), and 1 had both NOTCH1 and NOTCH4 ((1/11), 9.1%)). Wild-type status was found in 2/11 (18.2%) patients and one tumor was not analyzable. A review of 8 previous studies that included 79 LOTs revealed frequent mutations in the genes that regulate the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway: MTOR (32/79 (40.5%)), TSC1 (21/79 (26.6%)), and TSC2 (9/79 (11.4%)). Other mutated genes included PIK3CA, NF2, and PTEN, not typically known to affect the mTOR pathway, but potentially acting as upstream and downstream effectors. Our study shows that LOT is increasingly diagnosed in routine practice when applying the appropriate diagnostic criteria. We also confirm that the mTOR pathway is strongly implicated in the pathogenesis of this tumor mainly through MTOR, TCS1, and TSC2 mutations, but other genes could also be involved in the pathway activation, especially in LOTs without "canonical" mutations.

Recent Advances in Renal Tumors with TSC/mTOR Pathway Abnormalities in Patients with Tuberous Sclerosis Complex and in the Sporadic Setting

A spectrum of renal tumors associated with frequent TSC/mTOR (tuberous sclerosis complex/mechanistic target of rapamycin) pathway gene alterations (in both the germline and sporadic settings) have recently been described. These include renal cell carcinoma with fibromyomatous stroma (RCC FMS), eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma (ESC RCC), eosinophilic vacuolated tumor (EVT), and low-grade oncocytic tumor (LOT). Most of these entities have characteristic morphologic and immunohistochemical features that enable their recognition without the need for molecular studies. In this report, we summarize recent advances and discuss their evolving complexity.

Kidney Tumors: New and Emerging Kidney Tumor Entities

This review summarizes current knowledge on several novel and emerging renal entities, including eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), RCC with fibromyomatous stroma, anaplastic lymphoma kinase-rearranged RCC, low-grade oncocytic renal tumor, eosinophilic vacuolated tumor, thyroidlike follicular RCC, and biphasic hyalinizing psammomatous RCC. Their clinical features, gross and microscopic morphology, immunohistochemistry, and molecular and genetic features are described. The diagnosis of most of them rests on recognizing their morphologic features using immunohistochemistry. Accurate diagnosis of these entitles will further reduce the category of "unclassifiable renal carcinomas/tumors" and will lead to better clinical management and improved patient prognostication.

Low-grade oncocytic tumour of the kidney is characterised by genetic alterations of TSC1, TSC2, MTOR or PIK3CA and consistent GATA3 positivity

Low-grade oncocytic tumour (LOT) of the kidney has recently emerged as a potential novel tumour type. Despite similarity to oncocytoma or eosinophilic chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, it shows diffuse keratin 7 immunohistochemistry (IHC) and negative KIT (CD117), which differs from both. We aimed to identify the molecular characteristics of these tumours. Seventeen tumours (one male, 16 female, nine previously published) fitting the original description of this entity (solid eosinophilic cell morphology, often with areas of tumour cells loosely stretched in oedematous stroma, and the above IHC features) were analysed with a next-generation sequencing panel of 324 cancer-associated genes from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue. All tumours harboured at least one alteration in either TSC1 (n = 7, 41%), TSC2 (n = 2, 12%), MTOR (n = 5, 29%) or PIK3CA (n = 4, 24%). Four tumours harboured a second alteration, including two NF2, one each in conjunction with MTOR and TSC2 alterations, one PTEN with TSC1 alteration and one tumour with both MTOR and TSC1 alterations. No other renal cancer-related or recurring gene alterations were identified. In addition to the previously described IHC findings, 16 of 16 were positive for GATA3. Eleven patients with follow-up had no metastases or recurrent tumours. Recurrent tuberous sclerosis/MTOR pathway gene alterations in LOT support its consideration as a distinct morphological, immunohistochemical and genetic entity. PIK3CA is another pathway member that may be altered in these tumours. Further study will be necessary to determine whether tumour behaviour or syndromic associations differ from those of oncocytoma and chromophobe carcinoma, warranting different clinical consideration.

TSC/MTOR mutated renal cell carcinoma with leiomyomatous stroma is a distinct entity: a comprehensive study of 12 cases

The 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Tumors of the Urinary System includes renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with leiomyomatous stroma (RCC-LS) as a provisional category. Recent studies have shown that this category includes at least 4 subtypes: clear cell (CCRCC), clear cell papillary renal cell tumor (CCPRCT), ELOC (TCEB1) mutated, and a subtype of RCC with TSC/MTOR mutations. The most recent 2022 World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Tumors of the Urinary System includes ELOC mutated RCC-LS as a distinct entity but does not address any other renal tumors with smooth muscle stroma. We reviewed >500 cases of RCC with clear cell phenotype and identified 12 cases that exhibited prominent smooth muscle stroma, of which 4 of the cases had been previously reported. Review of the H&E revealed that all of the tumors were circumscribed with nested, solid, tubular, and tubulopapillary architecture. The epithelium was intimately embedded in the rich smooth muscle stroma. WHO/ISUP grade corresponded to grade 3 and 4. Nuclei were randomly distributed and the cytoplasm had predominantly clear and occasionally flocculent appearance. Immunohistochemically, all the cases showed membranous CAIX staining, although the pattern was combined cup and box-shaped. CK7 was positive in all cases ranging from 25% to 100% of cells. Membranous and apical staining of CD10 was present in all cases. Next generation sequencing (NGS) of these cases identified mutations in TSC1 (n = 4), TSC2 (n = 3), and MTOR (n = 4) with one case exhibiting loss of TSC1. This descriptive study, although small, demonstrates the difficulty in applying the current WHO provisional criteria at a single institution. Given the heterogeneity seen with these cases, we suggest following up an immunohistochemical panel of CAIX, CK7, and CD10 with molecular diagnostic studies to assist in the diagnosis of TSC/MTOR associated RCC-LS, which we believe is a distinct entity.

Eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma: a single Indian tertiary center experience of three cases of a newly described entity

Background

Among adult malignant tumors, renal cell carcinoma accounts for 2–3% and has the worst prognosis among common urologic tumors. Recently, an eosinophilic, solid and cystic (ESC) renal cell carcinoma (RCC) histological subtype has been described and proposed as an entity separate than the 16 subtypes described in the 2016 WHO classification. The aim of the present study is to share our experience of three such cases of this newly described entity.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed our cases of renal cell carcinoma and describe the presentation, diagnosis and management with follow-up details of ESC RCC.

Results

Our three patients presented at an advanced stage with flank pain or mass, and one patient had metastasis. All patients underwent radical nephrectomy, diagnosis proved by histopathological examination with immunohistochemistry (IHC), with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm in all three cases. On IHC, CK 20 was positive in two cases and one patient with CK 20, CK 7 negative and PAX 8 positive.

Conclusions

ESC RCC is a newly described entity, with increasing incidence probably due to better diagnosis. Previously, 66 such cases are described, with female predominance, lower stage and indolent behavior. Only four cases with metastasis are described.

Kidney Tumors: New and Emerging Kidney Tumor Entities

This review summarizes current knowledge on several novel and emerging renal entities, including eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), RCC with fibromyomatous stroma, anaplastic lymphoma kinase-rearranged RCC, low-grade oncocytic renal tumor, eosinophilic vacuolated tumor, thyroidlike follicular RCC, and biphasic hyalinizing psammomatous RCC. Their clinical features, gross and microscopic morphology, immunohistochemistry, and molecular and genetic features are described. The diagnosis of most of them rests on recognizing their morphologic features using immunohistochemistry. Accurate diagnosis of these entitles will further reduce the category of "unclassifiable renal carcinomas/tumors" and will lead to better clinical management and improved patient prognostication.

How New Developments Impact Diagnosis in Existing Renal Neoplasms

In recent years, several emerging diagnostic entities have been described in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, our understanding of well-known and established entities has also grown. Clear cell papillary RCC is now relabeled as a tumor rather than carcinoma in view of its nonaggressive behavior. Renal tumors with a predominantly infiltrative pattern are very important for recognition, as most of these have aggressive behavior, including fumarate hydratase-deficient RCC, SMARCB1-deficient medullary carcinoma, collecting duct carcinoma, urothelial carcinoma, and metastases from other cancers.

The 2022 World Health Organization Classification of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs-Part A: Renal, Penile, and Testicular Tumours

The fifth edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of urogenital tumours (WHO "Blue Book"), published in 2022, contains significant revisions. This review summarises the most relevant changes for renal, penile, and testicular tumours. In keeping with other volumes in the fifth edition series, the WHO classification of urogenital tumours follows a hierarchical classification and lists tumours by site, category, family, and type. The section "essential and desirable diagnostic criteria" included in the WHO fifth edition represents morphologic diagnostic criteria, combined with immunohistochemistry and relevant molecular tests. The global introduction of massive parallel sequencing will result in a diagnostic shift from morphology to molecular analyses. Therefore, a molecular-driven renal tumour classification has been introduced, taking recent discoveries in renal tumour genomics into account. Such novel molecularly defined epithelial renal tumours include SMARCB1-deficient medullary renal cell carcinoma (RCC), TFEB-altered RCC, Alk-rearranged RCC, and ELOC-mutated RCC. Eosinophilic solid and cystic RCC is a novel morphologically defined RCC entity. The diverse morphologic patterns of penile squamous cell carcinomas are grouped as human papillomavirus (HPV) associated and HPV independent, and there is an attempt to simplify the morphologic classification. A new chapter with tumours of the scrotum has been introduced. The main nomenclature of testicular tumours is retained, including the use of the term "germ cell neoplasia in situ" (GCNIS) for the preneoplastic lesion of most germ cell tumours and division from those not derived from GCNIS. Nomenclature changes include replacement of the term "primitive neuroectodermal tumour" by "embryonic neuroectodermal tumour" to separate these tumours clearly from Ewing sarcoma. The term "carcinoid" has been changed to "neuroendocrine tumour", with most examples in the testis now classified as "prepubertal type testicular neuroendocrine tumour".

Do we need an updated classification of oncocytic renal tumors? : Emergence of low-grade oncocytic tumor (LOT) and eosinophilic vacuolated tumor (EVT) as novel renal entities

The category of "oncocytic renal tumors'' includes well-recognized entities, such as renal oncocytoma (RO) and eosinophilic variant of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (eo-ChRCC), as well as a group of "gray zone" oncocytic tumors, with overlapping features between RO and eo-ChRCC that create ongoing diagnostic and classification problems. These types of renal tumors were designated in the past as "hybrid oncocytoma-chromophobe tumors". In a recent update, the Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) proposed the term "oncocytic renal neoplasm of low malignant potential, not further classified", for such solitary and sporadic, somewhat heterogeneous, but relatively indolent tumors, with equivocal RO/eo-ChRCC features. GUPS also proposed that the term "hybrid oncocytic tumor" be reserved for tumors found in a hereditary setting, typically arising as bilateral and multifocal ones (as in Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome). More recent developments in the "gray zone" of oncocytic renal tumors revealed that potentially distinct entities may have been "hidden" in this group. Recent studies distinguished two new entities: "Eosinophilic Vacuolated Tumor" (EVT) and "Low-grade Oncocytic Tumor" (LOT). The rapidly accumulated evidence on EVT and LOT has validated the initial findings and has expanded the knowledge on these entities. Both are uniformly benign and are typically found in a sporadic setting, but rarely can be found in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex. Both have readily distinguishable morphologic and immunohistochemical features that separate them from similar renal tumors, without a need for detailed molecular studies. These tumors very frequently harbor TSC/MTOR mutations that are however neither specific nor restricted to these two entities. In this review, we outline a proposal for a working framework on how to classify such low-grade oncocytic renal tumors. We believe that such framework will facilitate their handling in practice and will stimulate further discussions and studies to fully elucidate their spectrum.

Diagnosing Oncocytoma by Core Needle Biopsy: A Single-Center Experience

Background

Oncocytoma is one of the most common benign kidney tumors, accounting for 3–7% of all solid renal masses. Diagnosing oncocytomas using renal biopsy remains a controversy in the uro-pathologic community. With the increasing use of biopsies for assessment of renal lesions, reaching this pathologically benign diagnosis may prevent further surgical measures and have significant clinical benefit.

Objective

To demonstrate our center's results using renal biopsy to diagnose oncocytomas and to suggest that this diagnosis can be made with high success rates.

Design

, Setting, and Participants. From our center's database, we retrospectively identified and retrieved all cases of oncocytoma diagnosed between the years 2011 and 2020 by renal biopsy. Medical records of those patients were then reviewed to view follow-up meetings and imaging of the lesions biopsied. Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis. In 21 biopsies performed on 19 patients, diagnosis was supported by subsequent follow-up averaging at 3.44 years per patient. Results and Limitations. The lesions exhibited benign behavior during follow-up after biopsy, consistent with the diagnosis of oncocytoma.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrates that with good patient selection and proficient cooperation between urologists, radiologists and dedicated uro-pathologists, correctly diagnosing oncocytomas using RCB is a viable task. Patient Summary. Oncocytomas are benign lesions of the kidney. In our study, we reviewed all cases of oncocytomas pathologically diagnosed using renal biopsy from our center's database. We found that in subsequent follow-up later to biopsy, the lesions displayed benign behavior consistent with oncocytoma. The use of percutaneous biopsies to reach this diagnosis could save patients more extensive surgeries.

Papillary renal cell carcinoma: current and controversial issues

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

Papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) is the second most frequent renal cancer subtype and represents 15-20% of all RCC. Classification of pRCC is changing because novel tumour entities have been discovered in the last years. In this review, we summarise recent studies relevant for the understanding of the molecular complexity and the broader differential diagnosis of pRCC.

RECENT FINDINGS

It has been 25 years ago, that pRCC was morphologically subdivided into type 1 and type 2. Recently described tumour entities in the 2022 WHO classification challenged this concept and allow a new view on the molecular background in pRCC. Biphasic hyalinizing psammomatous RCC and papillary renal neoplasm with reversed polarity are emerging tumour entities derived from the new concept of molecularly defined RCC subtypes. Immune checkpoint inhibition and tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been introduced as the new backbone in the first-line treatment of advanced pRCCs. To identify novel targeted treatments for patients with pRCC it is crucial to investigate the specific molecular background of pRCC considering emerging pRCC subtypes.

SUMMARY

In the future, a deeper understanding of the correlation between molecular aberrations and new pRCC subtypes may improve the classification of pRCC patients and could reveal potential predictive biomarkers for each subgroup.

Eosinophilic Vacuolated Tumor of Kidney: Clinical Perspective of a New Pathologic Emerging Entity

The eosinophilic vacuolated tumor (EVT) of the kidney is a newly identified and pathological emerging entity. In this case report, EVT diagnosed due to a partial nephrectomy performed for a suspicious kidney mass in a 47-year-old patient is presented. A review of the literature and this case indicates that EVT, also called high-grade oncocytoma, does not show clinically aggressive behavior. However, in case of clinical suspicion, tumors with this oncocytic morphology should be treated with nephron-sparing treatment methods, considering that they may be hybrid malignancies.

Low-grade oncocytic tumor (LOT) - a new renal entity ready for a prime time: An updated review

Low-grade oncocytic tumor (LOT) of kidney has been recently proposed as a new renal entity. LOT was identified in the spectrum of oncocytic renal tumors with overlapping features between oncocytoma and eosinophilic chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, or it has been labelled as one of those entities in prior studies and in practice. LOT is often a single, relatively small tumor, found in a non-syndromic setting, but rare examples of multiple LOTs or admixed with other tumors have been found in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex. LOT typically has solid architecture, and it is composed of eosinophilic cells, with round to oval 'low-grade' nuclei, lacking irregularities and showing focal perinuclear halos. Sharp transition into edematous stromal areas, with scattered or loosely arranged cells are frequently found. LOT has a consistent immunohistochemical profile with diffuse reactivity for cytokeratin 7 and absent (or rarely weak) expression for CD117, a profile different from oncocytoma and eosinophilic chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. Similarly, in contrast to those entities, it also lacks or shows only weak expression for FOXI1. Recent studies have shown that LOT has a molecular/genetic profile different from other renal tumors, with frequent alterations affecting the MTOR/TSC pathway genes. LOT demonstrates either disomic pattern or deletions of 19p13, 19q13 and 1p36, and lacks complete chromosomal losses or gains. In all published studies to date, LOT has shown benign behavior. In this review, we summarize the evidence from recently published studies, which strongly supports the conclusion that LOT is a distinct and unique renal entity.

Activity of ALK Inhibitors in Renal Cancer with ALK Alterations: A Systematic Review

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) associated with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangements (ALK-RCC) is currently considered an “emerging or provisional” tumor entity by the last World Health Organization classification published in 2016. Although several studies assessing ALK-RCC’s clinical and histological characteristics have been published in recent years, only a few publications have evaluated the activity of ALK inhibitors (ALK-i) in this subgroup of patients. Considering the well-recognized efficacy of this evolving class of targeted therapies in other ALK-positive tumors, we conducted a systematic review to evaluate the reported activity of ALK-i in the ALK-RCC subtype. MEDLINE was searched from its inception to 7 January 2022 for case reports and case series on adult metastatic ALK-RCC patients treated with ALK-i whose therapeutic outcomes were available. A virtual cohort of ALK-RCC patients was created. Our results showed a favorable activity of first- and second-generation ALK-i in pretreated ALK-RCC patients in terms of either radiological response or performance status improvement. We hope that the present work will prompt the creation of large, multi-institutional clinical trials to confirm these promising early data.

Unclassified Oncocytic Renal Neoplasm with Rib and Liver Metastases: Metastatic Oncocytoma?

Renal tumors with oncocytic or chromophobe-like morphology can be a common source of diagnostic difficulty. In some series, they constitute the largest group of unclassified renal cell carcinomas, a term used for neoplasms that do not fit the current classification of renal tumors. We describe the histological, immunohistochemical, and molecular findings of an eosinophilic renal neoplasm which presented with rib and liver metastases, and provide a review of the literature. The possibility of a renal oncocytoma with metastases was initially considered but excluded on the basis of several morphological and immunohistochemical features. Additionally, the tumor did not correspond with other traditional or newly emerging categories of renal neoplasms. It was therefore regarded as an unclassified oncocytic renal neoplasm which demonstrated evidence of malignant potential due to the presence of multiple metastases.

Oncocytic renal neoplasms with diffuse keratin 7 immunohistochemistry harbor frequent alterations in the mammalian target of rapamycin pathway

Low-grade oncocytic tumor (LOT) has been recently proposed as a unique renal tumor. However, we have encountered tumors with more oncocytoma-like morphology that show diffuse keratin 7 reactivity, which we sought to characterize molecularly. Eighteen tumors with a diffuse keratin 7 positive and KIT negative pattern were identified from 184 with predominantly oncocytoma-like histology. These tumors were subjected to detailed immunohistochemical evaluation and 14 were evaluated using the Illumina^® HiSeq 4000 platform for 324 cancer-associated genes. Patients' ages ranged from 39 to 80 (median = 59.5 years) with a male to female ratio of 1.25:1. Morphology was predominantly oncocytoma-like with discrete nests, compared to the solid and edematous patterns described in LOT. Other than positive keratin 7 and negative KIT, the tumor cells were positive for PAX8, E-cadherin, AE1/AE3, Ber-EP4, AMACR, CD10, and MOC31, and were negative for other studied markers. FH and INI1 were normal. Eleven of 14 harbored genomic abnormalities, likely sporadic, primarily involving the MTOR pathway (73%). Overall, the alterations included MTOR activating mutation (n = 1), TSC1 inactivating mutation (n = 1), TSC2 mutation (p.X534 splice site, n = 1), STK11 (a negative regulator of the MTOR pathway) mutation (n = 1), both STK11 and TSC1 mutations (n = 1), biallelic loss of PTEN and TSC1 deletion (n = 1), and MET amplification and TSC1 inactivating mutation (n = 1). Amplification of FGFR3 was identified in one additional tumor. Other alterations included FOXP1 loss (n = 1), NF2 E427 homozygous loss (n = 1), and PI3KCA activating mutation (n = 1). At a median follow-up of 68 months (2-147 months) for 15 patients, all were alive without disease. Oncocytic renal tumors with diffuse keratin 7 labeling show frequent alterations in the TSC/MTOR pathway, despite more oncocytoma-like morphology than initially described in LOT, likely expanding the morphologic spectrum of the latter.

Eosinophilic vacuolated tumor (EVT) of kidney demonstrates sporadic TSC/MTOR mutations: next-generation sequencing multi-institutional study of 19 cases

A distinct renal tumor has recently been described as "high-grade oncocytic renal tumor" and "sporadic renal cell carcinoma with eosinophilic and vacuolated cytoplasm". The Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) consensus proposed a unifying name "eosinophilic vacuolated tumor" (EVT) for this emerging entity. In this multi-institutional study, we evaluated 19 EVTs, particularly their molecular features and mutation profile, using next-generation sequencing. All cases were sporadic and none of the patients had a tuberous sclerosis complex. There were 8 men and 11 women, with a mean age of 47 years (median 50; range 15-72 years). Average tumor size was 4.3 cm (median 3.8 cm; range 1.5-11.5 cm). All patients with available follow-up data (18/19) were alive and without evidence of disease recurrence or progression during the follow-up, ranging from 12 to 198 months (mean 56.3, median 41.5 months). The tumors were well circumscribed, but lacked a well-formed capsule, had nested to solid growth, focal tubular architecture, and showed ubiquitous, large intracytoplasmic vacuoles, round to oval nuclei, and prominent nucleoli. Immunohistochemically, cathepsin K, CD117, CD10, and antimitochondrial antigen were expressed in all cases. Other positive stains included: PAX8, AE1/AE3 and CK18. CK7 was typically restricted only to rare scattered cells. Vimentin, HMB45, melan-A, and TFE3 were negative in all cases. All tumors showed retained SDHB. All cases (19/19) showed non-overlapping mutations of the mTOR pathway genes: TSC1 (4), TSC2 (7), and MTOR (8); one case with MTOR mutation showed a coexistent RICTOR missense mutation. Low mutational rates were found in all samples (ranged from 0 to 6 mutations/Mbp). Microsatellite instability and copy number variations were not found in any of the 17 analyzable cases. EVT represents an emerging renal entity that shows a characteristic and readily identifiable morphology, consistent immunohistochemical profile, indolent behavior, and mutations in either TSC1, TSC2, or MTOR genes.

Germline and sporadic mTOR pathway mutations in low-grade oncocytic tumor of the kidney

Low-grade oncocytic tumor (LOT) of the kidney is a recently described entity with poorly understood pathogenesis. Using next-generation sequencing (NGS) and complementary approaches, we provide insight into its biology. We describe 22 LOT corresponding to 7 patients presenting with a median age of 75 years (range 63-86 years) and male to female ratio 2:5. All 22 tumors demonstrated prototypical microscopic features. Tumors were well-circumscribed and solid. They were composed of sheets of tumor cells in compact nests. Tumor cells had eosinophilic cytoplasm, round to oval nuclei (without nuclear membrane irregularities), focal subtle perinuclear halos, and occasional binucleation. Sharply delineated edematous stromal islands were often observed. Tumor cells were positive for PAX8, negative for CD117, and exhibited diffuse and strong cytokeratin-7 expression. Six patients presented with pT1 tumors. At a median follow-up of 29 months, four patients were alive without recurrence (three patients had died from unrelated causes). All tumors were originally classified as chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, eosinophilic variant (chRCC-eo). While none of the patients presented with known syndromic features, one patient with multiple bilateral LOTs was subsequently found to have a likely pathogenic germline TSC1 mutation. Somatic, likely activating, mutations in MTOR and RHEB were identified in all other evaluable LOTs. As assessed by phospho-S6 and phospho-4E-BP1, mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) was activated across all cases but to different extent. MTOR mutant LOT exhibited lower levels of mTORC1 activation, possibly related to mTORC1 dimerization and the preservation of a wild-type MTOR copy (retained chromosome 1). Supporting its distinction from related entities, gene expression analyses showed that LOT clustered separately from classic chRCC, chRCC-eo, and RO. In summary, converging mTORC1 pathway mutations, mTORC1 complex activation, and a distinctive gene expression signature along with characteristic phenotypic features support LOT designation as a distinct entity with both syndromic and non-syndromic cases associated with an indolent course.

Low-grade oncocytic renal tumor (LOT): mutations in mTOR pathway genes and low expression of FOXI1

Low-grade oncocytic renal tumor (LOT) is an emerging provisional entity, described as rare solid renal oncocytic/eosinophilic tumor sharing diffuse CK7 and negative CD117 immunoprofile. The links between LOT and other eosinophilic chromophobe like-renal cell carcinomas (RCC) are currently discussed. We sequenced tumoral DNA with a next generation sequencing panel for kidney cancer and carried out immunohistochemical analyses with CK7, CD117, SDHB, 4EBP1-P, S6K-P, and FOXI1 antibodies in a series of ten cases of LOT (9 females, 1 male; mean age at surgery: 66 years, 42.3 to 83.4) retrospectively diagnosed from a cohort of 272 tumors initially classified as chromophobe RCC (CHRCC). All LOT were single, without known hereditary predisposition, classified stage pT1 (70%), pT2 (20%) or pT3a (10%). Morphological features were similar to previous descriptions and clinical behavior was indolent for the six cases with available follow-up. We identified genetic variations in mTOR pathway related genes in 80% of cases, MTOR (7 cases) or TSC1 (1 case). Expression of FOXI1 was absent in all cases. In 9 LOT, 4EBP1-P and S6K-P were overexpressed, suggesting mTOR pathway activation.Our data highlights the major role of mTOR pathway in tumorigenesis of LOT mostly due to activating MTOR gene variations. Absence of FOXI1 expression is a strong argument to distinguish LOT from eosinophilic CHRCC and to bring them closer to other recently described FOXI1 negative eosinophilic-CHRCC like with MTOR/TSC mutations. Altogether, our data argue to consider LOT as a distinct entity with a favorable clinical outcome. However, in case of metastasis, an accurate diagnosis of LOT would be essential for the patient's management and could allow targeted therapy.

Renal Oncocytoma: The Diagnostic Challenge to Unmask the Double of Renal Cancer

Renal oncocytoma represents the most common type of benign neoplasm that is an increasing concern for urologists, oncologists, and nephrologists due to its difficult differential diagnosis and frequent overtreatment. It displays a variable neoplastic parenchymal and stromal architecture, and the defining cellular element is a large polygonal, granular, eosinophilic, mitochondria-rich cell known as an oncocyte. The real challenge in the oncocytoma treatment algorithm is related to the misdiagnosis due to its resemblance, at an initial radiological assessment, to malignant renal cancers with a completely different prognosis and medical treatment. Unfortunately, percutaneous renal biopsy is not frequently performed due to the possible side effects related to the procedure. Therefore, the majority of oncocytoma are diagnosed after the surgical operation via partial or radical nephrectomy. For this reason, new reliable strategies to solve this issue are needed. In our review, we will discuss the clinical implications of renal oncocytoma in daily clinical practice with a particular focus on the medical diagnosis and treatment and on the potential of novel promising molecular biomarkers such as circulating microRNAs to distinguish between a benign and a malignant lesion.

What's new in the WHO 2022 classification of kidney tumours?

The World Health Organization (WHO) 2022 classification of urinary and male genital tumours (5th edition) has significantly improved our understanding of the morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular characteristics of renal tumours. The aim of this review is to outline the most important changes and diagnostic updates in the WHO 2022 classification of kidney tumours. A major change in this edition is the grouping of renal tumours into broader categories that include "clear cell renal tumours", "papillary renal tumours", "oncocytic and chromophobe renal tumours", "collecting duct tumours" as well as adding two categories of "other renal tumours" and "molecularly defined renal carcinomas". Novel entities included in the WHO 2022 classification are eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma (ESC RCC), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearranged RCC and ELOC (formerly TCEB1)-mutated RCC. The category of "other renal tumours" includes a group of diverse, unrelated renal tumours that do not fit into other categories. The group of "molecularly defined renal carcinomas" reflects recent discoveries in the renal tumour genomics. These molecularly-defined renal entities demonstrate a set of morphologic features reflecting genotype-phenotype relationships. Final diagnosis of such entities rests on phenotypic and immunohistochemical (IHC) correlation, usually associated with IHC surrogate makers that reflect specific genetic abnormalities.

Low-grade oncocytic tumor of kidney harboring TSC/MTOR mutation: clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical and molecular characteristics support a distinct entity

Low-grade oncocytic tumor (LOT) has recently been described as a distinct renal tumor. LOT shows consistent morphologic features and a CK7-positive/CD117-negative immunophenotype. To examine the clinicopathological, immunohistochemical, and molecular features of LOT, we searched our institutional archives and identified seven cases of LOT. All patients were female, with a mean age of 66 years (range 44-79 years). The average tumor size was 3.2 cm (range 1.6-5.5 cm). Macroscopically, the tumors showed tan-brown and solid cut surfaces. Microscopically, the tumors showed compact nested to solid growth pattern, three cases with areas of edematous stroma containing loosely connected small clusters, cords or dispersed single tumor cells. The tumor cells had uniformly round to oval nuclei with eosinophilic cytoplasm, and showed perinuclear halos. Two cases focally had nuclear irregularities and binucleated cells were occasionally seen in three cases. Immunohistochemically, diffuse positivity for CK7 and lack of CD117 expression were present in all cases. All of the tumors were negative for CD10, CK20, vimentin, CA9, TFE3, TFEB, HMB45, and Melan-A. All tumors were positive for MTOR and negative for Cathepsin-K. FH and SDHB were retained. Next generation sequencing identified genetic variations in the MTOR pathway related genes: TSC1 (4/7), TSC2 (5/7), and MTOR (1/7). All patients were alive and without disease progression, after a mean follow-up of 43 months (range 6-89 months). LOT is an uncommon eosinophilic renal neoplasm with unique morphological and characteristic immunophenotypic features, and may represent an emerging separate renal entity characterized by mutations in the TSC/MTOR pathway.

TSC/mTOR Pathway Mutation Associated Eosinophilic/Oncocytic Renal Neoplasms: A Heterogeneous Group of Tumors with Distinct Morphology, Immunohistochemical Profile, and Similar Genetic Background

A number of recently described renal tumor entities share an eosinophilic/oncocytic morphology, somewhat solid architectural growth pattern, and tendency to present as low-stage tumors. The vast majority of such tumors follow a non-aggressive clinical behavior. In this review, we discuss the morphological, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic profiles of the three most recent novel/emerging renal entities associated with TSC/mTOR pathway mutations. These are eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma, eosinophilic vacuolated tumors, and low-grade oncocytic tumors, which belong to a heterogeneous group of renal tumors, demonstrating mostly solid architecture, eosinophilic/oncocytic cytoplasm, and overlapping morphological and immunohistochemical features between renal oncocytoma and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. All three tumors also share a molecular genetic background with mutations in the mTORC1 pathway (TSC1/TSC2/mTOR/RHEB). Despite the common genetic background, it appears that the tumors with TSC/mTOR mutations represent a diverse group of distinct renal neoplasms.

The Morphological Spectrum of Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma and Prevalence of Provisional/Emerging Renal Tumor Entities with Papillary Growth

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) represents a heterogeneous disease, encompassing an increasing number of tumor subtypes. Post-2016, the World Health Organization (WHO) classification recognized that the spectrum of papillary renal cell carcinoma is evolving and has long surpassed the dichotomic simplistic "type 1 versus type 2" classification. The differential diagnosis of pRCC includes several new provisional/emerging entities with papillary growth. Type 2 tumors have been cleared out of several confounding entities, now regarded as independent tumors with specific clinical and molecular backgrounds. In this work we describe the prevalence and characteristics of emerging papillary tumor entities in two renal tumor cohorts (one consisting of consecutive papillary tumors from a single institute, the other consisting of consultation cases from several centers). After a review of 154 consecutive pRCC cases, 58% remained type 1 pRCC, and 34% type 2 pRCC. Papillary renal neoplasm with reversed polarity (1.3%), biphasic hyalinizing psammomatous RCC (1.3%), and biphasic squamoid/alveolar RCC (4.5%) were rare. Among 281 consultation cases, 121 (43%) tumors had a dominant papillary growth (most frequently MiT family translocation RCCs, mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma and clear cell papillary RCC). Our data confirm that the spectrum of RCCs with papillary growth represents a major diagnostical challenge, frequently requiring a second expert opinion. Papillary renal neoplasm with reversed polarity, biphasic hyalinizing psammomatous RCC, and biphasic squamoid/alveolar RCC are rarely sent out for a second opinion, but correct classification and knowledge of these variants will improve our understanding of the clinical behavior of renal tumors with papillary growth.

Renal Cell Carcinoma in Tuberous Sclerosis Complex

Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) is an autosomal dominant disorder in which renal manifestations are prominent. There are three major renal lesions in TSC: angiomyolipomas, cysts, and renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Major recent advances have revolutionized our understanding of TSC-associated RCC, including two series that together include more than 100 TSC-RCC cases, demonstrating a mean age at onset of about 36 years, tumors in children as young as 7, and a striking 2:1 female predominance. These series also provide the first detailed understanding of the pathologic features of these distinctive tumors, which include chromophobe-like features and eosinophilia, with some of the tumors unclassified. This pathologic heterogeneity is distinctive and reminiscent of the pathologic heterogeneity in Birt-Hogg-Dube-associated RCC, which also includes chromophobe-like tumors. Additional advances include the identification of sporadic counterpart tumors that carry somatic TSC1/TSC2/mTOR mutations. These include unclassified eosinophilic tumors, eosinophilic solid cystic RCC (ESC-RCC), and RCC with leiomyomatous stroma (RCCLMS). A variety of epithelial renal neoplasms have been identified both in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) and in the nonsyndromic setting associated with somatic mutations in the TSC1 and TSC2 genes. Interestingly, whether tumors are related to a germline or somatic TSC1/2 mutation, these tumors often display similar morphologic and immunophenotypic features. Finally, recent work has identified molecular links between TSC and BHD-associated tumors, involving the TFEB/TFE3 transcription factors.

[Oncocytic tumours of the kidney-new differential diagnoses]

BACKGROUND

Recent developments in differential diagnosis have led to new knowledge about oncocytic renal neoplasms.

OBJECTIVES

Overview of differential diagnosis of oncocytic tumours.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a literature search on oncocytic renal tumours and mapped known tumour types. Possible differential diagnoses are discussed.

RESULTS

Besides the tumour types already acknowledged by the 2016 WHO classification, there is new evidence regarding the group of hard-to-classify oncocytic neoplasms. Findings point to immunohistochemical and molecular characteristics that may lead to the establishment of new entities in the future. In addition, important differential diagnosis can now be identified, facilitating specific therapies for oncocytic renal tumours.

CONCLUSION

A correct diagnosis of oncocytic renal tumours not only improves prognostic assessment (and, if necessary, specific therapies) but is also clinically relevant regarding a possible association with hereditary tumour syndromes.

Immunoexpression of SDHB, FH, and CK20 among eosinophilic renal tumors: A tissue microarray study

BACKGROUND

Differential diagnosis can be a challenge for eosinophilic subtypes of renal cell tumors due to their overlapping histomorphological and immunohistochemical features. We aimed to investigate the frequency of rare variants of renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) such as succinate dehydrogenase-deficient RCC (SDDRCC), hereditary leiomyomatosis and RCC (HLRCC)-associated RCC, and eosinophilic, solid, and cystic RCC (ESCRCC) in our population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Renal tumors which could be considered in the eosinophilic tumor category were included: 91 conventional clear cell RCCs with eosinophilic cytoplasm, 72 papillary RCCs, 74 chromophobe RCCs, 88 oncocytomas, and 37 other rare subtypes. Using the tissue microarray method, succinate dehydrogenase B (SDHB), fumarate hydratase (FH), and cytokeratin 20 (CK20) antibodies were performed by immunohistochemistry. Immunohistochemistry was repeated on whole block sections for selected cases. The utility of these antibodies in the differential diagnosis was also investigated.

RESULTS

Loss of SDHB expression was detected in three tumors, two of which showed typical morphology for SDDRCC. In additional two tumors, SDHB showed weak cytoplasmic expression without a mitochondrial pattern (possible-SDHB deficient). None of the tumors showed loss of FH expression. Heterogeneous reactions were observed with SDHB and FH antibodies. Only one ESCRCC was detected with diffuse CK20 positivity.

CONCLUSION

SDDRCCs, HLRCC-associated RCCs, and ESCRCCs are very rare tumors depending on the population. Possible weak staining and focal loss of SDHB and FH expression should be kept in mind and genetic testing must be included for equivocal results.

Eosinophilic Vacuolated Tumor of the Kidney: A Review of Evolving Concepts in This Novel Subtype With Additional Insights From a Case With MTOR Mutation and Concomitant Chromosome 1 Loss

Recent advances in molecular genetics have expanded our knowledge of renal tumors and enabled a better classification. These studies have revealed that renal tumors with predominantly "eosinophilic/oncocytic" cytoplasm include several novel biological subtypes beyond the traditionally well-recognized renal oncocytoma and an eosinophilic variant of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. Herein, we present a comprehensive review of the eosinophilic vacuolated tumor (EVT) building upon a case report including radiology, histopathology, electron microscopy, and next-generation sequencing. EVTs are characterized by mTORC1 activation. We speculate that loss of chromosome 1 in EVT with MTOR mutation may be driven in part by an advantage conferred by loss of the remaining MTOR wild-type allele. mTORC1 is best known for its role in promoting protein translation and it is interesting that dilated cisterns of rough endoplasmic reticulum (ER) likely account for the cytoplasmic vacuoles seen by light microscopy. We present an integrated view of EVT as well as cues that can assist in the differential diagnosis.

Key Renal Neoplasms With a Female Predominance

Renal neoplasms largely favor male patients; however, there is a growing list of tumors that are more frequently diagnosed in females. These tumors include metanephric adenoma, mixed epithelial and stromal tumor, juxtaglomerular cell tumor, mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma, Xp11.2 (TFE3) translocation-associated renal cell carcinoma, and tuberous sclerosis complex (somatic or germline) associated renal neoplasms. The latter category is a heterogenous group with entities still being delineated. Eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma is the best-described entity, whereas, eosinophilic vacuolated tumor is a proposed entity, and the remaining tumors are currently grouped together under the umbrella of tuberous sclerosis complex/mammalian target of rapamycin-related renal neoplasms. The entities described in this review are often diagnostic considerations when evaluating renal mass tissue on biopsy or resection. For example, Xp11.2 translocation renal cell carcinoma is in the differential when a tumor has clear cell cytology and papillary architecture and occurs in a young or middle-aged patient. In contrast, tuberous sclerosis complex-related neoplasms often enter the differential for tumors with eosinophilic cytology. This review provides an overview of the clinical, gross, microscopic, immunohistochemical, genetic, and molecular alterations in key renal neoplasms occurring more commonly in females; differential diagnoses are also discussed regardless of sex predilection.

Low-grade oncocytic tumour expands the spectrum of renal oncocytic tumours and deserves separate classification: a review of 23 cases from a single tertiary institute

AIMS

Low-grade oncocytic tumour (LOT) has recently been introduced as a potential distinct entity.

METHODS

At the Indiana University department of pathology, primary renal epithelial neoplasms between 2005 and 2020 were searched after appropriate institutional review board permissions.

RESULTS

Twenty-three cases (male/female ratio 14/9) with a median age of 66 (23-84 years) were identified. The majority of patients underwent partial nephrectomy (15/23, 65%), with a median tumour size of 4.0 cm (2.2-10.5 cm). Only one case had infiltration beyond the kidney (perinephric fat). Solid/diffuse proliferation of tightly packed oncocytic tumour cells and occasional tubule formations, with an abrupt edematous change in the stroma with loosely connected small clusters of tumour cells. Along with diffuse CK7 expression with lack of CD117 in all cases, vimentin was positive in 8/23 cases (35%, 5 focal). CD10 was expressed in 6/13 (46%, 4 focal). Alpha-Methylacyl-CoA Racemase (AMACR) was positive in 5/8 (63%) cases. Focal but intense cytoplasmic colloidal iron stain was present in 3/20 (15%) cases. Luminal or cytoplasmic/perinuclear precipitation was observed in 8/20 (40%) cases. Succinate Dehydrogenase B (SDHB) was performed in 6 cases, with all retained expression.

CONCLUSIONS

LOT is a clinically indolent and potentially benign entity with distinguishable morphology and immunohistochemical profile that can be performed and be easily interpreted in most of surgical pathology settings. Additional studies with larger cohorts, comprehensive molecular evaluation and longer follow-up are needed to definitively recognise these tumours as a separate entity and to further address the possibility of active surveillance options in eligible patients.

Co-existence of ESC-RCC, EVT, and LOT as synchronous and metachronous tumors in six patients with multifocal neoplasia but without clinical features of tuberous sclerosis complex

Renal cell tumors with oncocytic phenotypes represent a daily challenge, with several novel, emerging, and provisional entities enriching the diagnostic repertoire. Eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma (ESC-RCC), low-grade oncocytic tumor (LOT), and eosinophilic vacuolated tumor (EVT) have been recognized as unique entities, although their distinctive nature remains controversial. Although most of these tumors are sporadic, rare reports of similar tumors in tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) have been published. We describe multifocal, often bilateral, tumors in six patients without personal or family history of syndromic diseases. More than 60 tumors in various combinations were identified in 10 nephrectomies and one biopsy encompassing ESC-RCC (n = 6), LOT (n = 14), EVT (n = 1), clear cell RCC with fibromyomatous stroma (n = 12), clear cell RCC (n = 2), angiomyolipomas (AMLs; n > 20), unclassified renal cell tumors (n = 2), papillary adenomas (n = 4), and renomedullary interstitial cell tumor (n = 1). TSC1 germline pathogenic mutations were confirmed in two patients. A tumor without germline testing in a third patient revealed TSC1 biallelic inactivation. Two additional patients had molecular testing, which excluded common renal mutations and syndromes. We provide the first evidence of co-existence in the same organ and unequivocal relatedness of ESC-RCC, EVT, and LOT. End-stage renal disease was present in three of six patients with precursor lesions to all above tumors within adjacent renal parenchyma. In conclusion, identification of multifocal tumors with TSC-like morphology, especially in association with AMLs, could be the first manifestation of clinically silent TSC guiding clinical recommendations for further genetic testing and/or treatment recommendations.

Novel, emerging and provisional renal entities: The Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) update on renal neoplasia

The Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) undertook a critical review of the recent advances in renal neoplasia, particularly focusing on the newly accumulated evidence post-2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification. In the era of evolving histo-molecular classification of renal neoplasia, morphology is still key. However, entities (or groups of entities) are increasingly characterized by specific molecular features, often associated either with recognizable, specific morphologies or constellations of morphologies and corresponding immunohistochemical profiles. The correct diagnosis has clinical implications leading to better prognosis, potential clinical management with targeted therapies, may identify hereditary or syndromic associations, which may necessitate appropriate genetic testing. We hope that this undertaking will further facilitate the identification of these entities in practice. We also hope that this update will bring more clarity regarding the evolving classification of renal neoplasia and will further reduce the category of "unclassifiable renal carcinomas/tumors". We propose three categories of novel entities: (1) "Novel entity", validated by multiple independent studies; (2) "Emerging entity", good compelling data available from at least two or more independent studies, but additional validation is needed; and (3) "Provisional entity", limited data available from one or two studies, with more work required to validate them. For some entities initially described using different names, we propose new terminologies, to facilitate their recognition and to avoid further diagnostic dilemmas. Following these criteria, we propose as novel entities: eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma (ESC RCC), renal cell carcinoma with fibromyomatous stroma (RCC FMS) (formerly RCC with leiomyomatous or smooth muscle stroma), and anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearrangement-associated renal cell carcinoma (ALK-RCC). Emerging entities include: eosinophilic vacuolated tumor (EVT) and thyroid-like follicular renal cell carcinoma (TLFRCC). Finally, as provisional entities, we propose low-grade oncocytic tumor (LOT), atrophic kidney-like lesion (AKLL), and biphasic hyalinizing psammomatous renal cell carcinoma (BHP RCC).

Cathepsin K: A Novel Diagnostic and Predictive Biomarker for Renal Tumors

Simple Summary

Our understanding of renal tumors has increased in the last years with the description of several novel entities. The expanding morphological spectrum complicates the pathologist’s diagnosis, often requiring immunohistochemical analysis. The role of cathepsin K immunoexpression is widened as a diagnostic tool in several renal tumors. This review describes the usefulness of cathepsin K in the differential diagnosis of renal neoplasms, highlighting the biological knowledge underpinning its expression. Moreover, cathepsin K seems to be a downstream marker of different genetic alterations, with a possible role as a predictive marker that may prospectively guide the development of therapeutic approaches as a molecular target.

Abstract

Cathepsin K is a papain-like cysteine protease with high matrix-degrading activity. Among several cathepsins, cathepsin K is the most potent mammalian collagenase, mainly expressed by osteoclasts. This review summarizes most of the recent findings of cathepsin K expression, highlighting its role in renal tumors for diagnostic purposes and as a potential molecular target. Indeed, cathepsin K is a recognized diagnostic tool for the identification of TFE3/TFEB-rearranged renal cell carcinoma, TFEB-amplified renal cell carcinoma, and pure epithelioid PEComa/epithelioid angiomyolipoma. More recently, its expression has been observed in a subgroup of eosinophilic renal neoplasms molecularly characterized by TSC/mTOR gene mutations. Interestingly, both TSC mutations or TFE3 rearrangement have been reported in pure epithelioid PEComa/epithelioid angiomyolipoma. Therefore, cathepsin K seems to be a downstream marker of TFE3/TFEB rearrangement, TFEB amplification, and mTOR pathway activation. Given the established role of mTOR inhibitors as a pharmacological option in renal cancers, cathepsin K could be of use as a predictive marker of therapy response and as a potential target. In the future, uropathologists may implement the use of cathepsin K to establish a diagnosis among renal tumors with clear cells, papillary architecture, and oncocytic features.

Classification of renal cell tumors – current concepts and use of ancillary tests: recommendations of the Brazilian Society of Pathology

Classification of renal cell carcinomas has become more challenging. The 2016 WHO classification included 14 different subtypes and 4 emerging/provisional entities, and recent literature indicates new entities to be incorporated. Nomenclature is based on cytoplasmic appearance, architecture, combination of morphologies, anatomic location, underlying disease, familial syndromes, and specific genetic alterations. Immunohistochemistry is useful in selected cases while it can be insufficient in entities that require molecular confirmation of a specific gene alteration. The aim of these recommendations is to provide a reasonable and optimized approach for the use of ancillary tests in subtyping renal tumors, particularly in resource-limited settings.

TSC/MTOR-mutated eosinophilic renal tumors are a distinct entity that is CK7+/CK20-/vimentin-: a validation study

Unclassified renal cell carcinoma (RCC) accounts for ∼10% of renal tumors, and the most common histologic finding in these cases is eosinophilic cytoplasm. We previously demonstrated that a subset of eosinophilic renal tumors with heterogeneous morphology and immunohistochemical (IHC) staining harbored pathogenic mutations in tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) or mammalian target of rapamycin (MTOR) as the primary defining mutation. We identified an additional 8 cases of eosinophilic tumors with unusual morphology that were originally diagnosed as chromophobe RCC (CHRCC) or CHRCC, eosinophilic variant. As a comparison, we included four classic CHRCC cases and one CHRCC, eosinophilic variant case. Gross examination revealed solid or solid and cystic patterns. The solid areas were composed of eosinophilic tumor cells divided by congested vessels, whereas the cystic areas were lined by cytologically bland eosinophilic cells with septae containing nests, ribbons, and single eosinophilic tumor cells. The tumor cells had abundant granular eosinophilic cytoplasm with round nuclei and inconspicuous nucleoli. IHC analysis demonstrated diffuse staining for CK7 and negative staining for CK20 and vimentin. Next-generation sequencing identified pathogenic variants in three genes: TSC1, TSC2, and MTOR. They also lacked significant copy number variations in contrast to our control cases. We have demonstrated with our expanded study that cases previously diagnosed as CHRCC or CHRCC, eosinophilic variant with discordant histology and IHC staining patterns may represent a separate subtype of RCC characterized by mutations in the TSC/MTOR pathway.

ALK rearranged renal cell carcinoma (ALK-RCC): a multi-institutional study of twelve cases with identification of novel partner genes CLIP1, KIF5B and KIAA1217

ALK rearranged renal cell carcinoma (ALK-RCC) has recently been included in 2016 WHO classification as a provisional entity. In this study, we describe 12 ALK-RCCs from 8 institutions, with detailed clinical, pathological, immunohistochemical (IHC), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and next generation sequencing (NGS) analyses. Patients' age ranged from 25 to 68 years (mean, 46.3 years). Seven patients were females and five were males (M:F = 1:1.4). Tumor size ranged from 17 to 70 mm (mean 31.5, median 25 mm). The pTNM stage included: pT1a (n = 7), pT1b (n = 1), and pT3a (n = 4). Follow-up was available for 9/12 patients (range: 2 to 153 months; mean 37.6 months); 8 patients were alive without disease and one was alive with distant metastases. The tumors demonstrated heterogeneous, 'difficult to classify' morphology in 10/12 cases, typically showing diverse architectural and cellular morphologies, including papillary, tubular, tubulocystic, solid, sarcomatoid (spindle cell), rhabdoid, signet-ring cell, and intracytoplasmic vacuoles, often set in a mucinous background. Of the remaining two tumors, one showed morphology resembling mucinous tubular and spindle cell renal cell carcinoma (MTSC RCC-like) and one was indistinguishable from metanephric adenoma. One additional case also showed a focal metanephric adenoma-like area, in an otherwise heterogeneous tumor. By IHC, all tumors were diffusely positive for ALK and PAX8. In both cases with metanephric adenoma-like features, WT1 and ALK were coexpressed. ALK rearrangement was identified in 9/11 tumors by FISH. ALK fusion partners were identified by NGS in all 12 cases, including the previously reported: STRN (n = 3), TPM3 (n = 3), EML4 (n = 2), and PLEKHA7 (n = 1), and also three novel fusion partners: CLIP1 (n = 1), KIF5B (n = 1), and KIAA1217 (n = 1). ALK-RCC represents a genetically distinct entity showing a heterogeneous histomorphology, expanded herein to include unreported metanephric adenoma-like and MTSC RCC-like variants. We advocate a routine ALK IHC screening for "unclassifiable RCCs" with heterogeneous features.

Characterization of a distinct low-grade oncocytic renal tumor (CD117-negative and cytokeratin 7-positive) based on a tertiary oncology center experience: the new evidence from China

To examine the clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical features of a group of newly defined low-grade oncocytic renal tumors (LOT) that have the "CD117 negative/cytokeratin (CK)7 positive" immunoprofile. We have queried our hospital database and found 4456 consecutive renal tumors between 2016 and 2019. Among these renal tumors, eight (8) cases meet the morphologic and immunohistochemical characterization for low-grade oncocytic renal tumor (LOT). The eight (8) patients' mean age is 56.6 years (range 39-70 years old), and the male to female ratio is 1:1. Macroscopically, these LOTs generally present with tan-brown and solid cut surfaces and demonstrate similar solid, compact nested growth pattern microscopically. Tumor cells exhibit oncocytic cytoplasm and uniformly rounded to oval nuclei. There are areas of edematous stroma containing dispersed single or small clustered tumor cells. All tumors are negative for CD117 and positive for CK7. Uniform reactivity is also found for BerEP4, cyclin D1, and SDHB. Besides, CD10, vimentin, and AMACR are either negative or only focally positive. All of the tumors are negative for CA9 and TFE. The Ki-67 index is less than 5% in the seven (7) internal cases. Seven (7) of the eight (8) patients who are available for follow-up are alive and without disease recurrence (mean follow-up period of 21.6 months, ranging from 6 to 43 months). We described a group of low-grade oncocytic renal tumors identified retrospectively in a large tertiary cancer center, which was probably the first report originated from China or even Asia in the English literature so far. These tumors demonstrated eosinophilic cytoplasm and low-grade appearing nuclei with a "CD117 negative/CK7 positive" immunoprofile. The incidence rate was about 3.7% of the oncocytic renal tumors and 0.18% of all the renal tumors that were received in our lab during the four-year period. It is necessary to separate this group of tumors by its characteristic morphologic and immunophenotypic features.