1
|
Ho C, Samlowski W. Outcome of an Accelerated Treatment Algorithm for Patients Developing Diarrhea as a Complication of Ipilimumab-Based Cancer Immunotherapy in a Community Practice. Curr Oncol 2024; 31:3529-3545. [PMID: 38920743 PMCID: PMC11202529 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31060260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2024] [Revised: 06/12/2024] [Accepted: 06/14/2024] [Indexed: 06/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Immune-mediated diarrhea represents a serious complication of checkpoint inhibitor therapy, especially following ipilimumab-based treatment. Efficient diagnosis and control of diarrhea remains an ongoing challenge. We developed an accelerated management paradigm for patients with ipilimumab-induced diarrhea. Patients who developed significant diarrhea (>five loose stools/day) were presumed to be developing immune colitis. Therapy was interrupted and patients were treated with a methylprednisolone dose pack. If diarrhea was not completely resolved, high-dose steroids and infliximab were promptly added. Only non-responding patients underwent further evaluation for infection or other causes of diarrhea. A total of 242 patients were treated with ipilimumab-based regimens. Forty-six developed significant diarrhea (19%) and thirty-four (74.4%) had a rapid resolution of diarrhea following glucocorticosteroid and infliximab treatment. The median time to resolution of diarrhea was only 8.5 ± 16.4 days. Accelerated treatment for presumed immune-mediated diarrhea resulted in the rapid control of symptoms in the majority of patients. There were no intestinal complications or deaths. Immunosuppressive therapy for diarrhea did not appear to decrease the remission rate or survival. After the control of diarrhea, most patients were able to continue their planned immunotherapy. Further testing in 11/46 patients with unresponsive diarrhea revealed additional diagnoses, allowing their treatment to be adjusted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clarice Ho
- School of Medicine, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557, USA;
| | - Wolfram Samlowski
- School of Medicine, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557, USA;
- Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89148, USA
- Kerkorian School of Medicine, University of Nevada Las Vegas (UNLV), Las Vegas, NV 89106, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Janssen JC, van Dijk B, de Joode K, Aarts MJB, van den Berkmortel FWPJ, Blank CU, Boers-Sonderen MJ, van den Eertwegh AJM, de Groot JWB, Jalving M, de Jonge MJA, Joosse A, Kapiteijn E, Kamphuis-Huismans AM, Naipal KAT, Piersma D, Rikhof B, Westgeest HM, Vreugdenhil G, Oomen-de Hoop E, Mulder EEAP, van der Veldt AAM. Safe Stop IPI-NIVO trial: early discontinuation of nivolumab upon achieving a complete or partial response in patients with irresectable stage III or metastatic melanoma treated with first-line ipilimumab-nivolumab - study protocol. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:632. [PMID: 38783238 PMCID: PMC11112744 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12336-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 05/03/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with irresectable stage III or metastatic melanoma presenting with poor prognostic factors are usually treated with a combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), consisting of ipilimumab and nivolumab. This combination therapy is associated with severe immune related adverse events (irAEs) in about 60% of patients. In current clinical practice, patients are usually treated with ICIs for up to two years or until disease progression or the occurrence of unacceptable AEs. The incidence of irAEs gradually increases with duration of treatment. While durable tumour responses have been observed after early discontinuation of treatment, no consensus has been reached on optimal treatment duration. The objective of the Safe Stop IPI-NIVO trial is to evaluate whether early discontinuation of ICIs is safe in patients with irresectable stage III or metastatic melanoma who are treated with combination therapy. METHODS The Safe Stop IPI-NIVO trial is a nationwide, multicentre, prospective, single-arm, interventional study in the Netherlands. A total of 80 patients with irresectable stage III or metastatic melanoma who are treated with combination therapy of ipilimumab-nivolumab and have a complete or partial response (CR/PR) according to RECIST v1.1 will be included to early discontinue maintenance therapy with anti-PD-1. The primary endpoint is the rate of ongoing response at 12 months after start of ICI. Secondary endpoints include ongoing response at 24 months, disease control at different time points, melanoma specific and overall survival, the incidence of irAEs and health-related quality of life. DISCUSSION From a medical, healthcare and economic perspective, overtreatment should be prevented and shorter treatment duration of ICIs is preferred. If early discontinuation of ICIs is safe for patients who are treated with the combination of ipilimumab-nivolumab, the treatment duration of nivolumab could be shortened in patients with a favourable tumour response. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT05652673, registration date: 08-12-2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J C Janssen
- Department of Medical Oncology and Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam, 3015GD, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - B van Dijk
- Department of Medical Oncology and Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam, 3015GD, The Netherlands
| | - K de Joode
- Department of Medical Oncology and Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam, 3015GD, The Netherlands
| | - M J B Aarts
- Department of Medical Oncology, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - C U Blank
- Department of Medical Oncology, NKI-AvL, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden UMC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - A J M van den Eertwegh
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J W B de Groot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Isala Zwolle, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - M Jalving
- Department of Medical Oncology, UMC Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - M J A de Jonge
- Department of Medical Oncology and Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam, 3015GD, The Netherlands
| | - A Joosse
- Department of Medical Oncology and Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam, 3015GD, The Netherlands
| | - E Kapiteijn
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden UMC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - K A T Naipal
- Department of Medical Oncology and Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam, 3015GD, The Netherlands
| | - D Piersma
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - B Rikhof
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | - H M Westgeest
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amphia Ziekenhuis, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - G Vreugdenhil
- Department of Medical Oncology, Maxima Medisch Centrum Veldhoven, Veldhoven, The Netherlands
| | - E Oomen-de Hoop
- Department of Medical Oncology and Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam, 3015GD, The Netherlands
| | - E E A P Mulder
- Department of Medical Oncology and Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam, 3015GD, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Astrid A M van der Veldt
- Department of Medical Oncology and Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam, 3015GD, The Netherlands.
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Roccuzzo G, Sarda C, Pala V, Ribero S, Quaglino P. Prognostic biomarkers in melanoma: a 2023 update from clinical trials in different therapeutic scenarios. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2024; 24:379-392. [PMID: 38738539 DOI: 10.1080/14737159.2024.2347484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2023] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Over the past decade, significant advancements in the field of melanoma have included the introduction of a new staging system and the development of immunotherapy and targeted therapies, leading to changes in substage classification and impacting patient prognosis. Despite these strides, early detection remains paramount. The quest for dependable prognostic biomarkers is ongoing, given melanoma's unpredictable nature, especially in identifying patients at risk of relapse. Reliable biomarkers are critical for informed treatment decisions. AREAS COVERED This review offers a comprehensive review of prognostic biomarkers in the context of clinical trials for immunotherapy and targeted therapy. It explores different clinical scenarios, including adjuvant, metastatic, and neo-adjuvant settings. Key findings suggest that tumor mutational burden, PD-L1 expression, IFN-γ signature, and immune-related factors are promising biomarkers associated with improved treatment responses. EXPERT OPINION Identifying practical prognostic factors for melanoma therapy is challenging due to the tumor's heterogeneity. Promising biomarkers include tumor mutational burden (TMB), circulating tumor DNA, and those characterizing the tumor microenvironment, especially the immune component. Future research should prioritize large-scale, prospective studies to validate and standardize these biomarkers, emphasizing clinical relevance and real-world applicability. Easily accessible biomarkers have the potential to enhance the precision and effectiveness of melanoma management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriele Roccuzzo
- Department of Medical Sciences, Section of Dermatology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Cristina Sarda
- Department of Medical Sciences, Section of Dermatology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Valentina Pala
- Department of Medical Sciences, Section of Dermatology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Simone Ribero
- Department of Medical Sciences, Section of Dermatology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Pietro Quaglino
- Department of Medical Sciences, Section of Dermatology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Vargas GM, Shafique N, Xu X, Karakousis G. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes as a prognostic and predictive factor for Melanoma. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2024; 24:299-310. [PMID: 38314660 PMCID: PMC11134288 DOI: 10.1080/14737159.2024.2312102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 02/06/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) have been investigated as prognostic factors in melanoma. Recent advancements in assessing the tumor microenvironment in the setting of more widespread use of immune checkpoint blockade have reignited interest in identifying predictive biomarkers. This review examines the function and significance of TILs in cutaneous melanoma, evaluating their potential as prognostic and predictive markers. AREAS COVERED A literature search was conducted on papers covering tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in cutaneous melanoma available online in PubMed and Web of Science from inception to 1 December 2023, supplemented by citation searching. This article encompasses the assessment of TILs, the role of TILs in the immune microenvironment, TILs as a prognostic factor, TILs as a predictive factor for immunotherapy response, and clinical applications of TILs in the treatment of cutaneous melanoma. EXPERT OPINION Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes play a heterogeneous role in cutaneous melanoma. While they have historically been associated with improved survival, their status as independent prognostic or predictive factors remains uncertain. Novel methods of TIL assessment, such as determination of TIL subtypes and molecular signaling, demonstrate potential for predicting therapeutic response. Further, while their clinical utility in risk-stratification in melanoma treatment shows promise, a lack of consensus data hinders standardized application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Neha Shafique
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Xiaowei Xu
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Giorgos Karakousis
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ko B, Tao K, Brennan L, Rakhade S, Chan CX, Moone JY, Zhu R, Sher A, Wang S, Bracero Y, Fullerton B, McLellan B, Geskin LJ, Saenger YM. Evaluating the efficacy of combination and single-agent immunotherapies in real-world patterns of disease progression and survival of metastatic melanoma patients. Melanoma Res 2024; 34:134-141. [PMID: 38181115 PMCID: PMC10906191 DOI: 10.1097/cmr.0000000000000945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/07/2024]
Abstract
The objective of this study is to describe survival outcomes in patients with metastatic melanoma in a real-world setting receiving combination and single-agent immunotherapy outside the clinical trial context. We conducted a retrospective single-institution study of patients with metastatic melanoma in a real-world setting. Survival was calculated using log-rank test. Contingency tables were analyzed using Fisher's Exact test. CD8 + T-cell densities were measured using quantitative immunofluorescence and analyzed using Mann-Whitney U test. The median overall survival (OS) for 132 patients was 45.3 months. Brain metastasis did not confer a higher risk of death relative to liver and/or bone disease (39.53 versus 30.00 months, respectively; P = 0.687). Anti-PD-1 monotherapy was the most common first-line treatment, received by 49.2% of patients. There was no significant difference in OS between patients receiving single-agent anti-PD-1 and combination anti-PD-1 plus CTLA-4 (39.4 months versus undefined; P = 0.643). Patients treated with combination therapy were more likely to be alive without progression at the last follow-up than those who received monotherapy (70.4% versus 49.2%; P = 0.0408). Median OS was 21.8 months after initiation of second-line therapy after anti-PD-1 monotherapy. CD8+ T-cell densities were higher in patients who achieved disease control on first-line immunotherapy ( P = 0.013). In a real-world setting, patients with metastatic melanoma have excellent survival rates, and treatment benefit can be achieved even after progression on first-line therapy. Combination immunotherapy may produce more favorable long-term outcomes in a real-world setting. High pretreatment CD8+ T-cell infiltration correlates with immunotherapy efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian Ko
- National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Kevin Tao
- Montefiore Einstein Cancer Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx
| | - Lachlan Brennan
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York
| | - Swanand Rakhade
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York
| | - Cynthia X. Chan
- Division of Dermatology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx
| | | | - Richard Zhu
- Division of Dermatology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx
| | - Ariel Sher
- Division of Dermatology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx
| | - Samuel Wang
- Montefiore Einstein Cancer Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx
| | - Yadriel Bracero
- Montefiore Einstein Cancer Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx
| | - Ben Fullerton
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York
| | - Beth McLellan
- Division of Dermatology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx
| | - Larisa J. Geskin
- Department of Dermatology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Yvonne M. Saenger
- Montefiore Einstein Cancer Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Poletto S, Paruzzo L, Nepote A, Caravelli D, Sangiolo D, Carnevale-Schianca F. Predictive Factors in Metastatic Melanoma Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: From Clinical Practice to Future Perspective. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 16:101. [PMID: 38201531 PMCID: PMC10778365 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16010101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Revised: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
The introduction of immunotherapy revolutionized the treatment landscape in metastatic melanoma. Despite the impressive results associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), only a portion of patients obtain a response to this treatment. In this scenario, the research of predictive factors is fundamental to identify patients who may have a response and to exclude patients with a low possibility to respond. These factors can be host-associated, immune system activation-related, and tumor-related. Patient-related factors can vary from data obtained by medical history (performance status, age, sex, body mass index, concomitant medications, and comorbidities) to analysis of the gut microbiome from fecal samples. Tumor-related factors can reflect tumor burden (metastatic sites, lactate dehydrogenase, C-reactive protein, and circulating tumor DNA) or can derive from the analysis of tumor samples (driver mutations, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, and myeloid cells). Biomarkers evaluating the immune system activation, such as IFN-gamma gene expression profile and analysis of circulating immune cell subsets, have emerged in recent years as significantly correlated with response to ICIs. In this manuscript, we critically reviewed the most updated literature data on the landscape of predictive factors in metastatic melanoma treated with ICIs. We focus on the principal limits and potentiality of different methods, shedding light on the more promising biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Poletto
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, AOU S. Luigi Gonzaga, 10043 Orbassano, Italy;
| | - Luca Paruzzo
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, 10124 Turin, Italy; (L.P.); (D.S.)
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Alessandro Nepote
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, AOU S. Luigi Gonzaga, 10043 Orbassano, Italy;
| | - Daniela Caravelli
- Medical Oncology Division, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCs, 10060 Candiolo, Italy; (D.C.); (F.C.-S.)
| | - Dario Sangiolo
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, 10124 Turin, Italy; (L.P.); (D.S.)
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Warburton L, Reid A, Amanuel B, Calapre L, Millward M, Gray E. Detectable ctDNA at the time of treatment cessation of ipilimumab and nivolumab for toxicity predicts disease progression in advanced melanoma patients. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1280730. [PMID: 38179171 PMCID: PMC10766351 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1280730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/01/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) has led to unprecedented outcomes for melanoma patients but is associated with toxicity. ICI resumption after high grade irAEs poses a significant challenge in the clinical management of melanoma patients and there are no biomarkers that can help identify patients that might benefit from resuming treatment. This study aims to determine if circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) levels at the time of treatment-limiting irAE could guide treatment decisions in this clinical context. Methods This is a retrospective exploratory biomarker study from 34 patients treated with combination ICI for stage IV melanoma. Patients had a treatment-limiting toxicity and a baseline plasma collection prior to commencing ICI and within 6 weeks of stopping therapy. Blood samples were tested for ctDNA at baseline and cessation therapy. Results Median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) have not been reached (24-month PFS rate 54% and OS rate 72.3%). PD occurred in 47% (16/34) of patients. Median PFS with detectable ctDNA from plasma collected at the time of toxicity was 6.5 months while not reached (NR) with undetectable levels (HR: 4.0, 95% CI 0.95-17.5, p=0.0023). Median OS with detectable ctDNA at cessation for toxicity was 19.4 months and NR for undetectable ctDNA (HR: 3.9, 95%CI 20.8-18.6, p=0.024). Positive ctDNA at the time of cessation was highly specific (specificity 0.94, 95% CI 0.74-0.99, PPV 0.88, 95% CI 0.53-0.99). However, ctDNA negativity has low sensitivity as a predictor of ongoing disease control (sensitivity 0.437, 95% CI 0.23-0.67). Notably, 4/9 (44%) ctDNA negative patients who had disease progression had brain only disease progression. Conclusions Undetectable ctDNA and CR on imaging after stopping immunotherapy for toxicity results in high rates of long-term durable control. For patients with immunotherapy related toxicity, who have persistent ctDNA at 8 - 12 weeks, the risk of disease progression is significant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lydia Warburton
- Centre for Precision Health, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, WA, Australia
| | - Anna Reid
- Centre for Precision Health, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia
- School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia
| | - Benhur Amanuel
- Anatomical Pathology, PathWest, Queen Elizabeth II (QEII) Medical Centre, Nedlands, WA, Australia
- School of Biomedical Science, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
| | - Leslie Calapre
- Centre for Precision Health, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia
- School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia
| | - Michael Millward
- School of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
| | - Elin Gray
- Centre for Precision Health, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia
- School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Su M, Yang Y, Wang P. Efficacy and safety of the combined use of ipilimumab and nivolumab for melanoma patients with brain metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol 2023; 45:761-769. [PMID: 37228242 DOI: 10.1080/08923973.2023.2215403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Accepted: 05/14/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Immune checkpoint inhibitors have advanced immunotherapy for melanoma patients.Objective: This study evaluates efficacy and safety of ipilimumab and nivolumab combination (IN) for melanoma brain metastases (MBM) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS Literature search was conducted in electronic databases and studies were included if they reported efficacy and safety of IN in MBM patients or prognostic information related to brain metastases. Outcomes evaluated were objective response rate (ORR), complete remission/stable disease/progressive disease rates, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), incidence rates of adverse events, and hazard ratios of disease progression or mortality between IN-treated patients with and without brain metastasis. RESULTS Intracranial ORR was higher in IN-treated MBM patients than with control therapies (nivolumab or ipilimumab plus fotemustine). IN treatment led to longer PFS and OS in than control treatments. Five-year OS of IN-treated MBM patients was up to 51% compared to 34% for nivolumab. Outcomes were better for treatment naïve and asymptomatic patients. Whereas many studies reported significantly higher mortality or progression risk with IN treatment in MBM patients compared to non-MBM melanoma patients, many others did not find this risk significant. Incidence of grade 3/4 adverse events in IN-treated MBM patients was: diarrhea or colitis (16%), hepatitis (15%), rash (8%), increased alanine transaminase (8%), increased aspartate aminotransferase (7%), increased lipase (6%), increased amylase (4%), fatigue (3%), hypophysitis (2%), pneumonitis (2%), headache (2%), nausea or vomiting (1%), and neutropenia (1%). CONCLUSION IN is an efficacious and safer treatment option for MBM patients, especially for asymptomatic and treatment naïve patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mengmeng Su
- Department of Radiotherapy, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yuyan Yang
- Department of Radiotherapy, Peking University International Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Peng Wang
- Department of Radiotherapy, Peking University International Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Dummer R, Corrie P, Gutzmer R, Meniawy TM, Del Vecchio M, Lebbé C, Guida M, Dutriaux C, Dreno B, Meyer N, Ferrucci PF, Dalle S, Khattak MA, Grob JJ, Briscoe K, Larkin J, Mansard S, Lesimple T, Guidoboni M, Sabatini S, Richtig E, Herbst R, Lobo M, Askelson M, Ascierto PA, Maio M. First-Line, Fixed-Duration Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Followed by Nivolumab in Clinically Diverse Patient Populations With Unresectable Stage III or IV Melanoma: CheckMate 401. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:3917-3929. [PMID: 37307514 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.02199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2022] [Revised: 03/17/2023] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 06/14/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To address the paucity of data in patients with historically poor outcomes, we conducted the single-arm phase IIIb CheckMate 401 study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of nivolumab plus ipilimumab followed by nivolumab monotherapy in clinically diverse patient populations with advanced melanoma. METHODS Treatment-naive patients with unresectable stage III-IV melanoma received nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg once every 3 weeks (four doses) followed by nivolumab 3 mg/kg (240 mg following a protocol amendment) once every 2 weeks for ≤24 months. The primary end point was the incidence of grade 3-5 select treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Overall survival (OS) was a secondary end point. Outcomes were evaluated in subgroups defined by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), brain metastasis status, and melanoma subtype. RESULTS In total, 533 patients received at least one dose of study drug. Grade 3-5 select TRAEs affecting the GI (16%), hepatic (15%), endocrine (11%), skin (7%), renal (2%), and pulmonary (1%) systems occurred in the all-treated population; similar incidence rates were observed across all subgroups. At 21.6 months' median follow-up, 24-month OS rates were 63% in the all-treated population, 44% in the ECOG PS 2 subgroup (including patients with cutaneous melanoma only), 71% in the brain metastasis subgroup, 36% in the ocular/uveal melanoma subgroup, and 38% in the mucosal melanoma subgroup. CONCLUSION Nivolumab plus ipilimumab followed by nivolumab monotherapy was tolerable in patients with advanced melanoma and poor prognostic characteristics. Efficacy was similar between the all-treated population and patients with brain metastases. Reduced efficacy was observed in patients with ECOG PS 2, ocular/uveal melanoma, and/or mucosal melanoma, highlighting the continued need for novel treatment options for these difficult-to-treat patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Pippa Corrie
- Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Ralf Gutzmer
- Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
- Johannes-Wesling Medical Center, Ruhr University Bochum Campus, Minden, Germany
| | - Tarek M Meniawy
- Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital and the University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
| | | | - Céleste Lebbé
- Université Paris Cité and AP-HP, Department of Dermato-oncology, INSERM U976, Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | - Nicolas Meyer
- Institut Universitaire and CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | | | | | - Muhammad Adnan Khattak
- Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, Australia
- Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Jean-Jacques Grob
- Aix-Marseille University and Hospital de la Timone AP-HM, Marseille, France
| | - Karen Briscoe
- North Coast Cancer Institute, Coffs Harbour, New South Wales, Australia
| | - James Larkin
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Massimo Guidoboni
- Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori IRCCS, Meldola, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Paolo A Ascierto
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Michele Maio
- University of Siena and Center for Immuno-Oncology, Department of Oncology, University Hospital, Siena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abler D, Courlet P, Dietz M, Gatta R, Girard P, Munafo A, Wicky A, Jreige M, Guidi M, Latifyan S, De Micheli R, Csajka C, Prior JO, Michielin O, Terranova N, Cuendet MA. Semiautomated Pipeline to Quantify Tumor Evolution From Real-World Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Imaging. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2023; 7:e2200126. [PMID: 37146261 PMCID: PMC10281365 DOI: 10.1200/cci.22.00126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2022] [Revised: 11/04/2022] [Accepted: 02/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/07/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE A semiautomated pipeline for the collection and curation of free-text and imaging real-world data (RWD) was developed to quantify cancer treatment outcomes in large-scale retrospective real-world studies. The objectives of this article are to illustrate the challenges of RWD extraction, to demonstrate approaches for quality assurance, and to showcase the potential of RWD for precision oncology. METHODS We collected data from patients with advanced melanoma receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors at the Lausanne University Hospital. Cohort selection relied on semantically annotated electronic health records and was validated using process mining. The selected imaging examinations were segmented using an automatic commercial software prototype. A postprocessing algorithm enabled longitudinal lesion identification across imaging time points and consensus malignancy status prediction. Resulting data quality was evaluated against expert-annotated ground-truth and clinical outcomes obtained from radiology reports. RESULTS The cohort included 108 patients with melanoma and 465 imaging examinations (median, 3; range, 1-15 per patient). Process mining was used to assess clinical data quality and revealed the diversity of care pathways encountered in a real-world setting. Longitudinal postprocessing greatly improved the consistency of image-derived data compared with single time point segmentation results (classification precision increased from 53% to 86%). Image-derived progression-free survival resulting from postprocessing was comparable with the manually curated clinical reference (median survival of 286 v 336 days, P = .89). CONCLUSION We presented a general pipeline for the collection and curation of text- and image-based RWD, together with specific strategies to improve reliability. We showed that the resulting disease progression measures match reference clinical assessments at the cohort level, indicating that this strategy has the potential to unlock large amounts of actionable retrospective real-world evidence from clinical records.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Abler
- Department of Oncology, Precision Oncology Center, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Institute of Informatics, School of Management, University of Applied Sciences Western Switzerland (HES-SO), Sierre, Switzerland
| | - Perrine Courlet
- Department of Oncology, Precision Oncology Center, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Centre for Research and Innovation in Clinical Pharmaceutical Sciences, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Matthieu Dietz
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Department, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- INSERM U1060, CarMeN Laboratory, University of Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Roberto Gatta
- Department of Oncology, Precision Oncology Center, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Pascal Girard
- Translational Medicine, Merck Institute of Pharmacometrics, Lausanne, Switzerland, an Affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Alain Munafo
- Translational Medicine, Merck Institute of Pharmacometrics, Lausanne, Switzerland, an Affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Alexandre Wicky
- Department of Oncology, Precision Oncology Center, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Mario Jreige
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Department, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Monia Guidi
- Centre for Research and Innovation in Clinical Pharmaceutical Sciences, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Service of Clinical Pharmacology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Sofiya Latifyan
- Service of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Rita De Micheli
- Service of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Chantal Csajka
- Centre for Research and Innovation in Clinical Pharmaceutical Sciences, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Western Switzerland, University of Geneva, University of Lausanne, Geneva, Switzerland
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - John O. Prior
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Department, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Olivier Michielin
- Department of Oncology, Precision Oncology Center, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Nadia Terranova
- Translational Medicine, Merck Institute of Pharmacometrics, Lausanne, Switzerland, an Affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Michel A. Cuendet
- Department of Oncology, Precision Oncology Center, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lodde GC, Jansen P, Herbst R, Terheyden P, Utikal J, Pföhler C, Ulrich J, Kreuter A, Mohr P, Gutzmer R, Meier F, Dippel E, Weichenthal M, Sucker A, Placke JM, Zaremba A, Albrecht LJ, Kowall B, Galetzka W, Becker JC, Tasdogan A, Zimmer L, Livingstone E, Hadaschik E, Schadendorf D, Ugurel S, Griewank K. Characterisation and outcome of RAC1 mutated melanoma. Eur J Cancer 2023; 183:1-10. [PMID: 36773463 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2022] [Revised: 01/08/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Activating hot spot R29S mutations in RAC1, a small GTPase influencing several cellular processes including cell proliferation and cytoskeleton rearrangement, have been reported in up to 9% of sun-exposed melanomas. Clinical characteristics and treatment implications of RAC1 mutations in melanoma remain unclear. METHODS We investigated the largest set (n = 64) of RAC1 mutated melanoma patients reported to date, including a retrospective single institution cohort (n = 34) from the University Hospital Essen and a prospective multicentre cohort (n = 30) from the translational study Tissue Registry in Melanoma (TRIM; CA209-578), for patient and tumour characteristics as well as therapy outcomes. RESULTS From 3037 sequenced melanoma samples screened RAC1 mutations occurred in ∼2% of samples (64/3037). The most common RAC1 mutation was P29S (95%, 61/64). The majority of tumours had co-occuring MAP kinase mutations (88%, 56/64); mostly activating NRAS (47%, 30/64) mutations, followed by activating BRAF (28%, 18/64) and NF1 (25%, 16/64) mutations. RAC1 mutated melanomas were almost exclusively of cutaneous origin (84%, 54/64) or of unknown primary (MUP, 14%, 9/64). C > T alterations were the most frequent mutation type identified demonstrating a UV-signature for RAC1 mutated melanoma. Most patients with unresectable disease (39) received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) (77%, 30/39). Objective response rate of first-line treatment in patients with stage III/IV disease was 21%; median overall survival was 47.8 months. CONCLUSIONS RAC1 mutated melanomas are rare, mostly of cutaneous origin and frequently harbour concomitant MAP kinase mutations, particularly in NRAS. Patients with advanced disease benefit from systemic treatment with ICI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georg C Lodde
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Philipp Jansen
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; Department of Dermatology and Allergology, UK Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
| | - Rudolf Herbst
- Department of Dermatology, Helios Klinikum Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany.
| | | | - Jochen Utikal
- Skin Cancer Unit, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Ruprecht-Karl University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany, DFKZ-Hector Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany; German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Claudia Pföhler
- Saarland University Medical School, Homburg, Department of Dermatology, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
| | - Jens Ulrich
- Department of Dermatology and Skin Cancer Center, Harzklinikum Dorothea Christiane Erxleben, Quedlinburg, Germany.
| | - Alexander Kreuter
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, HELIOS St. Elisabeth Klinik Oberhausen, University Witten/Herdecke, Oberhausen, Germany.
| | - Peter Mohr
- Dermatological Center Buxtehude, Elbe Kliniken Buxtehude, Buxtehude, Germany.
| | - Ralf Gutzmer
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology, Allergology and Phlebology, University Hospital Mühlenkreiskliniken Minden, Minden, Germany.
| | - Friedegund Meier
- Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Centre Dresden and National Center for Tumor Diseases, Dresden, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Germany, National Center for Tumor Diseases Dresden (NCT/UCC), Germany, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany; German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Edgar Dippel
- Department of Dermatology, Ludwigshafen Medical Center, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
| | - Michael Weichenthal
- Department of Dermatology, Skin Cancer Center, Schleswig-Holstein University Hospital, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
| | - Antje Sucker
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Jan-Malte Placke
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Anne Zaremba
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Lea Jessica Albrecht
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Bernd Kowall
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Wolfgang Galetzka
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Jürgen C Becker
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; Translational Skin Cancer Research, University Medicine Essen, Essen, Germany; German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Alpaslan Tasdogan
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Lisa Zimmer
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Elisabeth Livingstone
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Eva Hadaschik
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Dirk Schadendorf
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Selma Ugurel
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Klaus Griewank
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Amaro A, Reggiani F, Fenoglio D, Gangemi R, Tosi A, Parodi A, Banelli B, Rigo V, Mastracci L, Grillo F, Cereghetti A, Tastanova A, Ghosh A, Sallustio F, Emionite L, Daga A, Altosole T, Filaci G, Rosato A, Levesque M, Maio M, Pfeffer U, Croce M. Guadecitabine increases response to combined anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 treatment in mouse melanoma in vivo by controlling T-cells, myeloid derived suppressor and NK cells. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2023; 42:67. [PMID: 36934257 PMCID: PMC10024396 DOI: 10.1186/s13046-023-02628-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2022] [Accepted: 02/21/2023] [Indexed: 03/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The combination of Programmed Cell Death 1 (PD-1) and Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Antigen 4 (CTLA-4) blockade has dramatically improved the overall survival rate for malignant melanoma. Immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs) limit the tumor's immune escape yet only for approximately a third of all tumors and, in most cases, for a limited amount of time. Several approaches to overcome resistance to ICBs are being investigated among which the addition of epigenetic drugs that are expected to act on both immune and tumor cells. Guadecitabine, a dinucleotide prodrug of a decitabine linked via phosphodiester bond to a guanosine, showed promising results in the phase-1 clinical trial, NIBIT-M4 (NCT02608437). METHODS We used the syngeneic B16F10 murine melanoma model to study the effects of immune checkpoint blocking antibodies against CTLA-4 and PD-1 in combination, with and without the addition of Guadecitabine. We comprehensively characterized the tumor's and the host's responses under different treatments by flow cytometry, multiplex immunofluorescence and methylation analysis. RESULTS In combination with ICBs, Guadecitabine significantly reduced subcutaneous tumor growth as well as metastases formation compared to ICBs and Guadecitabine treatment. In particular, Guadecitabine greatly enhanced the efficacy of combined ICBs by increasing effector memory CD8+ T cells, inducing effector NK cells in the spleen and reducing tumor infiltrating regulatory T cells and myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSC), in the tumor microenvironment (TME). Guadecitabine in association with ICBs increased serum levels of IFN-γ and IFN-γ-induced chemokines with anti-angiogenic activity. Guadecitabine led to a general DNA-demethylation, in particular of sites of intermediate methylation levels. CONCLUSIONS These results indicate Guadecitabine as a promising epigenetic drug to be added to ICBs therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adriana Amaro
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi, 10, 16132, Genova, Italy
| | - Francesco Reggiani
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi, 10, 16132, Genova, Italy
| | - Daniela Fenoglio
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi, 10, 16132, Genova, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Rosaria Gangemi
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi, 10, 16132, Genova, Italy
| | - Anna Tosi
- Immunology and Molecular Oncology Diagnostics, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - Alessia Parodi
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi, 10, 16132, Genova, Italy
| | - Barbara Banelli
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi, 10, 16132, Genova, Italy
| | - Valentina Rigo
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi, 10, 16132, Genova, Italy
| | - Luca Mastracci
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi, 10, 16132, Genova, Italy
| | - Federica Grillo
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi, 10, 16132, Genova, Italy
| | - Alessandra Cereghetti
- Department of Dermatology, University of Zurich, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Aizhan Tastanova
- Department of Dermatology, University of Zurich, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Adhideb Ghosh
- Functional Genomics Center Zurich, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Fabio Sallustio
- Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy
| | - Laura Emionite
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi, 10, 16132, Genova, Italy
| | - Antonio Daga
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi, 10, 16132, Genova, Italy
| | - Tiziana Altosole
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi, 10, 16132, Genova, Italy
| | - Gilberto Filaci
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi, 10, 16132, Genova, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Antonio Rosato
- Immunology and Molecular Oncology Diagnostics, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, Padova, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Mitchell Levesque
- Department of Dermatology, University of Zurich, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Ulrich Pfeffer
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi, 10, 16132, Genova, Italy.
| | - Michela Croce
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi, 10, 16132, Genova, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
PD-L1 Tumor Expression as a Predictive Biomarker of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors’ Response and Survival in Advanced Melanoma Patients in Brazil. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:diagnostics13061041. [PMID: 36980349 PMCID: PMC10047789 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13061041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2022] [Revised: 02/15/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) agents are prominent immunotherapies for the treatment of advanced melanoma. However, they fail to promote any durable clinical benefit in a large cohort of patients. This study assessed clinical and molecular predictors of ICB response and survival in advanced melanoma. A retrospective analysis was performed on 210 patients treated with PD-1 or CTLA-4 inhibitors at Barretos Cancer Hospital, Brazil. PD-L1 expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissues collected prior to ICB therapy. Patients were divided into responders (complete and partial response and stable disease for more than 6 months) and non-responders (stable disease for less than 6 months and progressive disease). Among them, about 82% underwent anti-PD-1 immunotherapy, and 60.5% progressed after the ICB treatment. Patients that received ICB as first-line therapy showed higher response rates than previously treated patients. Higher response rates were further associated with superficial spreading melanomas and positive PD-L1 expression (>1%). Likewise, PD-L1 positive expression and BRAF V600 mutations were associated with a higher overall survival after ICB therapy. Since ICBs are expensive therapies, evaluation of PD-L1 tumor expression in melanoma patients should be routinely assessed to select patients that are most likely to respond.
Collapse
|
14
|
Real Check RIO: A Real-World Analysis of Nivolumab in First Line Metastatic Melanoma Assessing Efficacy, Safety and Predictive Factors. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15041265. [PMID: 36831607 PMCID: PMC9953812 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15041265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2023] [Revised: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 02/14/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2023] Open
Abstract
We performed a retrospective study on 51 metastatic melanoma patients treated with Nivolumab in first line, at the Regional Institute of Oncology (RIO) Iasi, Romania between April 2017 and December 2019. We studied the efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy on a treatment-naive population. After a median follow-up of 36 months, the median progression free survival (PFS) was 26 months (95% CI, 15-36) and the median overall survival (OS) was 31 months (95% CI, 20.1-41.8). At 12 months after the initiation of immunotherapy, the percentage of patients alive was 70%, and at 24 months 62.5%. The most common adverse events observed were dermatological (23.5%) and grade ≥3 was identified in 4 (6.8%) patients. Multivariate analysis indicated that the presence of liver metastases (HR 4.42; 95% CI: 1.88-10.4, p = 0.001) and a neutrophils/lymphocytes ratio (NLR) were associated with poor survival (HR 3.21; 95% CI: 1.04-9.87, p = 0.04). Although retrospective data on a small group of patients were analyzed, we can conclude that our results in RIO are similar to those described in clinical trials and other real-world studies. Our study highlights the potential usefulness of liver metastases and NLR as novel predictive factors in clinical decision-making.
Collapse
|
15
|
ter Maat L, van Duin IA, Elias SG, Leiner T, Verhoeff JJ, Arntz ER, Troenokarso MF, Blokx WA, Isgum I, de Wit GA, van den Berkmortel FW, Boers-Sonderen MJ, Boomsma MF, van den Eertwegh FJ, de Groot JWB, Piersma D, Vreugdenhil A, Westgeest HM, Kapiteijn E, van Diest PJ, Pluim J, de Jong PA, Suijkerbuijk KP, Veta M. CT radiomics compared to a clinical model for predicting checkpoint inhibitor treatment outcomes in patients with advanced melanoma. Eur J Cancer 2023; 185:167-177. [PMID: 36996627 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.02.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Revised: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Predicting checkpoint inhibitors treatment outcomes in melanoma is a relevant task, due to the unpredictable and potentially fatal toxicity and high costs for society. However, accurate biomarkers for treatment outcomes are lacking. Radiomics are a technique to quantitatively capture tumour characteristics on readily available computed tomography (CT) imaging. The purpose of this study was to investigate the added value of radiomics for predicting clinical benefit from checkpoint inhibitors in melanoma in a large, multicenter cohort. METHODS Patients who received first-line anti-PD1±anti-CTLA4 treatment for advanced cutaneous melanoma were retrospectively identified from nine participating hospitals. For every patient, up to five representative lesions were segmented on baseline CT, and radiomics features were extracted. A machine learning pipeline was trained on the radiomics features to predict clinical benefit, defined as stable disease for more than 6 months or response per RECIST 1.1 criteria. This approach was evaluated using a leave-one-centre-out cross validation and compared to a model based on previously discovered clinical predictors. Lastly, a combination model was built on the radiomics and clinical model. RESULTS A total of 620 patients were included, of which 59.2% experienced clinical benefit. The radiomics model achieved an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.607 [95% CI, 0.562-0.652], lower than that of the clinical model (AUROC=0.646 [95% CI, 0.600-0.692]). The combination model yielded no improvement over the clinical model in terms of discrimination (AUROC=0.636 [95% CI, 0.592-0.680]) or calibration. The output of the radiomics model was significantly correlated with three out of five input variables of the clinical model (p < 0.001). DISCUSSION The radiomics model achieved a moderate predictive value of clinical benefit, which was statistically significant. However, a radiomics approach was unable to add value to a simpler clinical model, most likely due to the overlap in predictive information learned by both models. Future research should focus on the application of deep learning, spectral CT-derived radiomics, and a multimodal approach for accurately predicting benefit to checkpoint inhibitor treatment in advanced melanoma.
Collapse
|
16
|
Carril-Ajuria L, Colomba E, Romero-Ferreiro C, Cerbone L, Ratta R, Barthelemy P, Vindry C, Fléchon A, Cherifi F, Boughalem E, Linassier C, Fornarini G, Rebuzzi SE, Gross-Goupil M, Saldana C, Martin-Soberón M, de Velasco G, Manneh R, Pernaut C, Sanchez de Torre A, Flippot R, Escudier B, Albiges L. Frontline immune checkpoint inhibitor-based combination therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients with poor performance status. Eur J Cancer 2023; 180:21-29. [PMID: 36527973 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.11.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Revised: 11/09/2022] [Accepted: 11/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immune checkpoint inhibitor-based combination therapy (ICI-based combination) is a new standard of care for metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in the frontline setting. Patients with poor performance status (PS) (≥2) were excluded from pivotal trials. Hence, the activity and safety of ICI-based combination therapy in this group of patients is still unknown. METHODS We performed a multicentre retrospective study of PS ≥2 mRCC patients who received frontline ICI-based combination, either nivolumab-ipilimumab (NI) or pembrolizumab-axitinib (AP). Patients' characteristics, clinical outcomes, and toxicity were collected. We analysed overall response rate (ORR), median progression-free survival (mPFS), median overall survival (mOS) and grade ≥3 adverse events (G ≥ 3AEs). The association between the predictive biomarker IPI (immune prognostic index) and ORR/PFS/OS was also evaluated. RESULTS We identified 70 mRCC patients with PS ≥2 treated with ICI-based combination across 14 institutions between October 2017 and December 2021, including 45 and 25 patients were treated with NI and AP, respectively. Median age at diagnosis was 63 years, 51 (73%) were male, only 17 (24%) had prior nephrectomy, 50 (71%) had synchronous metastatic disease at diagnosis, and 16 (23%) had brain metastases. Sixty-one (87%) and 9 (13%) patients had ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) PS 2 and 3, respectively, and 25 (36%) and 45 (64%) patients were intermediate and poor International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk, respectively. Among all, 91% were clear cell RCC, 7 patients had sarcomatoid features. At the time of the analysis (median follow-up 11.1 months), 41% patients were dead. Median PFS and mOS in the entire cohort were 5.4 months and 16.0 months, respectively; ORR was 31%. No significant differences in ORR, PFS, OS, or G ≥3AEs were seen between NI and AP. The intermediate and poor IPI groups were significantly associated with reduced ORR and shorter PFS. CONCLUSION We report the first cohort of PS ≥2 mRCC patients treated with frontline ICI-based combination therapy. The survival outcomes in our cohort were inferior to that reported in pivotal trials. No significant differences in ORR, PFS, OS or toxicity were seen between NI and AP. Prospective real-world studies are needed to confirm these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Emeline Colomba
- Medical Oncology Department, Institute Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Carmen Romero-Ferreiro
- Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria, Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain; Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, 28223 Madrid, Spain
| | - Luigi Cerbone
- Medical Oncology Department, Institute Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Philippe Barthelemy
- Medical Oncology, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg/ICANS, Strasbourg, France
| | | | - Aude Fléchon
- Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, 69008 Lyon, France
| | | | - Elouen Boughalem
- Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest, 49055 Angers, France
| | - Claude Linassier
- Medical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours, Tours, France
| | - Giuseppe Fornarini
- Medical Oncology, U.O. Oncologia Medica 1 RCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Sara E Rebuzzi
- Medical Oncology, U.O. Oncologia Medica 1 RCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Marine Gross-Goupil
- Medical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Saint-André, Bordeaux, France
| | - Carolina Saldana
- Medical Oncology, Hôpital Henri Mondor, APHP, Univ Paris Est Creteil, Créteil, France
| | | | | | - Ray Manneh
- Sociedad de Oncología y Hematología del Cesar, Valledupar, Colombia
| | - Cristina Pernaut
- Medical Oncology, University Hopital Severo Ochoa, Leganés, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Ronan Flippot
- Medical Oncology Department, Institute Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Bernard Escudier
- Medical Oncology Department, Institute Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Laurence Albiges
- Medical Oncology Department, Institute Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Takahashi A, Namikawa K, Ogata D, Jinnai S, Nakano E, Yamazaki N. Updated analysis of nivolumab and ipilimumab combination therapy in Japanese patients with advanced melanoma. J Dermatol 2022; 50:525-535. [PMID: 36514836 DOI: 10.1111/1346-8138.16669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2022] [Revised: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 11/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
The efficacy and safety of nivolumab and ipilimumab (N + I) combination therapy for Japanese patients with advanced unresectable melanoma was re-evaluated in clinical practice. One hundred Japanese patients with advanced melanoma were included. The overall response rate was 24%; complete response (CR), 6%; partial response, 18%. The response rates were 33.3% in the systemic therapy-naïve and 15.4% in the prior-treatment groups, and 16.1% for patients who were treated with first-line anti-programmed death 1 antibody monotherapy followed by second-line N + I therapy after progression of the disease. The response rate for cutaneous melanoma was 32.7%, and 47.8% in the naïve group. Response rates for non-acral, acral, and mucosal melanoma were 34.9%, 25%, and 16.7%, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) for all patients was 3.25 months (6.5 and 2.5 months in the naïve and prior-treatment groups, respectively). Median overall survival (OS) was 14.5 months (25.25 and 7.5 months in the naïve and prior-treatment groups, respectively). There were no significant differences in PFS or OS for patients with non-acral, acral, or mucosal melanoma. The 3-year PFS and OS were both 100% in patients who achieved CR with combination therapy. Adverse events occurred in 89% and were grade three or higher in 56% of cases. Although direct comparisons cannot be made due to different patient backgrounds, N + I combination therapy in Japanese patients in clinical practice tended to be inferior when compared to global study and non-Asian patients in clinical practice. The highest response rate was in the cutaneous melanoma therapy-naïve group. The best tumor response was associated with survival outcome, and the PFS and OS were good in cases where CR was obtained. The proportion of grade three and four adverse events was as high as that in the global study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akira Takahashi
- Department of Dermatologic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan.,Department of Dermatologic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kenjiro Namikawa
- Department of Dermatologic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Dai Ogata
- Department of Dermatologic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shunichi Jinnai
- Department of Dermatologic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan.,Department of Dermatologic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Eiji Nakano
- Department of Dermatologic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naoya Yamazaki
- Department of Dermatologic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Zhang Z, Rafei-Shamsabadi D, Lehr S, Buettner N, Diehl R, Huzly D, Pinato DJ, Thimme R, Meiss F, Bengsch B. Incidence and severity of immune-related hepatitis after dual checkpoint therapy is linked to younger age independent of herpes virus immunity. J Transl Med 2022; 20:582. [PMID: 36503532 PMCID: PMC9743538 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-022-03755-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2022] [Accepted: 11/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Dual immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy can result in immune-related-adverse events (irAE) such as ICB-hepatitis. An expansion of effector-memory (TEM) CD4 T cells associated with antiviral immunity against herpesviridae was implicated in ICB-hepatitis. Notably, these memory subsets are frequently associated with age. Here, we sought to understand baseline patient, immune and viral biomarkers associated with the development of ICB-hepatitis to identify currently lacking baseline predictors and test if an expansion of TEM or positive serology against herpesviridae can predict ICB-hepatitis. METHODS A discovery (n = 39) and validation cohort (n = 67) of patients with advanced melanoma undergoing anti-PD-1&anti-CTLA4 combination therapy (total n = 106) were analyzed for baseline clinical characteristics, occurrence of irAE and oncological outcomes alongside serological status for CMV, EBV and HSV. Immune populations were profiled by high-parametric flow cytometry (n = 29). RESULTS ICB-hepatitis occurred in 59% of patients within 100 days; 35.9% developed severe (CTCAE 3-4) hepatitis. Incidence of ICB-hepatitis was higher in the younger (< 55y: 85.7%) compared to older (> = 55y: 27.8%) age group (p = 0.0003), occured earlier in younger patients (p < 0.0001). The association of younger age with ICB-Hepatitis was also observed in the validation cohort (p = 0.0486). Incidence of ICB-hepatitis was also associated with additional non-hepatic irAE (p = 0.018), but neither positive IgG serostatus for CMV, EBV or HSV nor TEM subsets despite an association of T cell subsets with age. CONCLUSION Younger age more accurately predicts ICB-hepatitis after anti-PD-1&anti-CTLA4 checkpoint therapy at baseline compared to herpes virus serology or TEM subsets. Younger patients should be carefully monitored for the development of ICB-hepatitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhen Zhang
- grid.7708.80000 0000 9428 7911Faculty of Medicine, Clinic for Internal Medicine II, Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Endocrinology, and Infectious Disease, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - David Rafei-Shamsabadi
- grid.7708.80000 0000 9428 7911Faculty of Medicine, Department of Dermatology and Venereology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Saskia Lehr
- grid.7708.80000 0000 9428 7911Faculty of Medicine, Department of Dermatology and Venereology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Nico Buettner
- grid.7708.80000 0000 9428 7911Faculty of Medicine, Clinic for Internal Medicine II, Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Endocrinology, and Infectious Disease, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Rebecca Diehl
- grid.7708.80000 0000 9428 7911Faculty of Medicine, Department of Dermatology and Venereology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Daniela Huzly
- grid.5963.9Institute of Virology, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg University Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - David J Pinato
- grid.413629.b0000 0001 0705 4923Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK ,grid.16563.370000000121663741Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - Robert Thimme
- grid.7708.80000 0000 9428 7911Faculty of Medicine, Clinic for Internal Medicine II, Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Endocrinology, and Infectious Disease, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Frank Meiss
- grid.7708.80000 0000 9428 7911Faculty of Medicine, Department of Dermatology and Venereology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Bertram Bengsch
- grid.7708.80000 0000 9428 7911Faculty of Medicine, Clinic for Internal Medicine II, Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Endocrinology, and Infectious Disease, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany ,grid.5963.9Signalling Research Centres BIOSS and CIBSS, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany ,grid.7497.d0000 0004 0492 0584Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Mercurio AC, Maniar AB, Wei AZ, Carvajal RD. Targeting the IL-2 pathway for the treatment of mucosal melanoma. Expert Opin Orphan Drugs 2022. [DOI: 10.1080/21678707.2022.2134776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ann C. Mercurio
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology & Oncology, 177 Fort Washington Avenue, 10032, New York, NY, USA
- New York Medical College, School of Medicine, 40 Sunshine Cottage Road, 10595, Valhalla, NY, USA
| | - Ashray B. Maniar
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology & Oncology, 177 Fort Washington Avenue, 10032, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alexander Z. Wei
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology & Oncology, 177 Fort Washington Avenue, 10032, New York, NY, USA
| | - Richard D. Carvajal
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology & Oncology, 177 Fort Washington Avenue, 10032, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Watson AS, Goutam S, Stukalin I, Ewanchuk BW, Sander M, Meyers DE, Pabani A, Cheung WY, Heng DYC, Cheng T, Monzon JG, Navani V. Association of Immune-Related Adverse Events, Hospitalization, and Therapy Resumption With Survival Among Patients With Metastatic Melanoma Receiving Single-Agent or Combination Immunotherapy. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2245596. [PMID: 36480204 PMCID: PMC9856439 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.45596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) due to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) have been shown to be positively associated with survival. Among patients with metastatic melanoma, evidence supporting this association has been conflicting, while ipilimumab-nivolumab combination ICB has been examined only in small clinical cohorts. OBJECTIVE To examine the association between irAEs and survival among patients with metastatic melanoma, in particular for those receiving combination ICB. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A retrospective cohort of 492 consecutive patients with metastatic melanoma treated with ICB at 2 tertiary and 4 regional cancer centers in Alberta, Canada, from August 1, 2013, to May 31, 2020, was observed. Patients were aged 18 years or older with metastatic melanoma agnostic to primary site, who received 1 or more doses of an anti-programmed cell death protein 1 agent as single or combination ICB. Clinically significant irAEs requiring systemic corticosteroids and/or treatment delay were captured. To minimize immortal time bias, only patients surviving 12 weeks after ICB initiation were included in survival analyses. Statistical analysis was conducted on December 10, 2021. EXPOSURES Development of irAEs requiring systemic corticosteroids and/or treatment delay. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), with the association of irAE development with OS assessed via Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses. The association of hospitalization for irAEs and ICB resumption after irAE with OS was examined. RESULTS Among 492 patients, the median age of those with irAEs was 61.8 years (IQR, 52.9-72.1 years), and the median age of those without irAEs was 65.5 years (IQR, 56.5-76.9 years), while sex distribution was comparable (137 of 198 men [69.2%] with irAEs vs 183 of 294 men [62.2%] without irAEs). There was an association between irAEs and OS both in the overall cohort (with irAEs: median OS, 56.3 months [95% CI, 38.2 months to not evaluable] vs without irAEs: median OS, 18.5 months [95% CI, 14.4-23.2 months]; P < .001) and in the 124 patients (25.2%) receiving combination ICB (with irAEs: median OS, 56.2 months [95% CI, 52.2 months to not evaluable] vs without irAEs: median OS, 19.0 months [95% CI, 6.6 months to not evaluable]; P < .001). Hospitalization for irAE did not alter this positive association with OS compared with outpatient treatment (median OS, not evaluable [95% CI, 31.5 months to not evaluable] vs median OS, 52.2 months [95% CI, 35.2 months to not evaluable]; P = .53), while resumption of ICB was associated with longer OS than not resuming ICB (median, 56.3 months [95% CI, 40.8 months to not evaluable] vs 31.5 months [95% CI, 21.0 months to not evaluable]; P = .009). A favorable independent association of irAEs with OS was confirmed in multivariable analysis (hazard ratio for death, 0.382 [95% CI, 0.254-0.576]; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This study suggests an association between irAEs and OS for patients with metastatic melanoma, including those treated with combination ICB and those with severe irAEs requiring hospitalization. The potential benefit associated with ICB resumption after irAEs warrants further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander S. Watson
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Siddhartha Goutam
- Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Igor Stukalin
- Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | | | - Michael Sander
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Daniel E. Meyers
- Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Aliyah Pabani
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Winson Y. Cheung
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Daniel Y. C. Heng
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Tina Cheng
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jose G. Monzon
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Vishal Navani
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Serra-Bellver P, Versluis JM, Oberoi HK, Zhou C, Slattery TD, Khan Y, Patrinely JR, Pires da Silva I, Martínez-Vila C, Cook N, Graham DM, Carlino MS, Menzies AM, Arance AM, Johnson DB, Long GV, Pickering L, Larkin JMG, Blank CU, Lorigan P. Real-world outcomes with ipilimumab and nivolumab in advanced melanoma: a multicentre retrospective study. Eur J Cancer 2022; 176:121-132. [PMID: 36215945 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2022] [Revised: 09/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess efficacy and toxicity of combination immunotherapy with ipilimumab plus nivolumab in routine practice in a retrospective multicentre cohort of patients with advanced melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS This retrospective analysis included patients with advanced melanoma treated with ipilimumab and nivolumab between October 2015 and January 2020 at six centres in Australia, Europe and the United States of America. We describe efficacy outcomes (overall survival [OS], progression-free survival [PFS] and objective response rate [ORR]) in treatment-naïve and pre-treated patients, with and without brain metastases, plus treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) in all patients treated. RESULTS A total of 697 patients were identified; 472 were treatment-naïve of which 138 (29.2%) had brain metastases, and 225 were previously treated of which 102 (45.3%) had brain metastases. At baseline, 32.3% had stage M1c and 34.4% stage M1d disease. Lactate dehydrogenase was high in 280 patients (40.2%). With a median follow-up of 25.9 months, median OS in the 334 treatment-naïve patients without brain metastases was 53.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 40.8-NR) and 38.7 months (95% CI 18.6-NR) for the 138 treatment-naïve patients with brain metastases. For the entire cohort the ORR was 48%, for treatment-naïve patients without brain metastases ORR was 56.6% with a median PFS of was 13.7 months (95% CI 9.6-26.5). Median PFS was 7.9 months (95% CI 5.8-10.4) and OS 38 months (95% CI 31-NR) for the entire cohort. Grade 3-4 trAE were reported in 44% of patients, and 4 (0.7%) treatment-related deaths (1 pneumonitis, 2 myocarditis and 1 colitis) were recorded. CONCLUSION The outcome and toxicity of combination immunotherapy with ipilimumab and nivolumab in a real-world patient population are similar to those reported in pivotal trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricio Serra-Bellver
- Department of Medical Oncology, Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
| | - Judith M Versluis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Honey K Oberoi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Cong Zhou
- Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute Cancer Biomarker Centre, University of Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Timothy D Slattery
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Yasir Khan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - James R Patrinely
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Inês Pires da Silva
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney and the Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Westmead and Blacktown Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - C Martínez-Vila
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Natalie Cook
- Department of Medical Oncology, Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Donna M Graham
- Department of Medical Oncology, Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Matteo S Carlino
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney and the Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Westmead and Blacktown Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Alexander M Menzies
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney and the Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, Australia
| | - Ana M Arance
- Institut D'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Douglas B Johnson
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Georgina V Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney and the Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, Australia
| | - Lisa Pickering
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - James M G Larkin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Christian U Blank
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Paul Lorigan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Early Effects of Nivolumab and Ipilimumab Combined Immunotherapy in the Treatment of Metastatic Melanoma in Poland: A Multicenter Experience. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10102528. [PMID: 36289790 PMCID: PMC9598919 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10102528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2022] [Revised: 09/29/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Nivolumab and ipilimumab combination became the first-line standard in advanced melanoma. We assessed its efficacy in a real-life study in Poland. In a one-year follow-up, we evaluated the medical records of 50 melanoma patients treated with that modality in five oncology centers. We recorded therapy outcomes and adverse events (AEs) after 3 and 12 months of therapy. At the first checkpoint, the disease control rate (DCR) was recorded in 58% (n = 29) of patients, but the same number of patients (n = 29, 58%) stopped immunotherapy due to disease progression (PD, n = 14, 48.3%), toxicity (n = 11, 37.9%) or death (n = 4, 13.8%). Among patients with DCR after the induction phase, 8 (27.6%) terminated due to toxicity, and 21 (72.4%) continued. However, at the 12-month checkpoint, only 14 patients (27% of all) were still receiving immunotherapy. In 7 (33.3%) it was discontinued due to PD (n = 2), toxicity (n = 2, 28.6% each), or death (n = 3, 42.9%). AEs occurred in 66.7% (n = 34) of patients; severe (grade 3 or 4) in half of them. Interestingly, those with AEs had an 80% lower risk of death (hazard ratio [HR] 0.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.07−0.57, p = 0.001) and PD (HR 0.2, 95%CI 0.09−0.47, p < 0.0001). In the entire group of patients, after a 12-month follow-up, the median overall survival was not reached (NR, range: 6.8 months-NR) and progression-free survival was 6.3 (range: 3-NR) months. Our results demonstrate that combined immunotherapy is less effective in real-life than in pivotal trials. However, early responders will likely continue the therapy after a one-year follow-up. AEs occurrence might be a predictor of clinical effectiveness.
Collapse
|
23
|
Dobre EG, Constantin C, Neagu M. Skin Cancer Research Goes Digital: Looking for Biomarkers within the Droplets. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12071136. [PMID: 35887633 PMCID: PMC9323323 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12071136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2022] [Revised: 07/12/2022] [Accepted: 07/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Skin cancer, which includes the most frequent malignant non-melanoma carcinomas (basal cell carcinoma, BCC, and squamous cell carcinoma, SCC), along with the difficult to treat cutaneous melanoma (CM), pose important worldwide issues for the health care system. Despite the improved anti-cancer armamentarium and the latest scientific achievements, many skin cancer patients fail to respond to therapies, due to the remarkable heterogeneity of cutaneous tumors, calling for even more sophisticated biomarker discovery and patient monitoring approaches. Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR), a robust method for detecting and quantifying low-abundance nucleic acids, has recently emerged as a powerful technology for skin cancer analysis in tissue and liquid biopsies (LBs). The ddPCR method, being capable of analyzing various biological samples, has proved to be efficient in studying variations in gene sequences, including copy number variations (CNVs) and point mutations, DNA methylation, circulatory miRNome, and transcriptome dynamics. Moreover, ddPCR can be designed as a dynamic platform for individualized cancer detection and monitoring therapy efficacy. Here, we present the latest scientific studies applying ddPCR in dermato-oncology, highlighting the potential of this technology for skin cancer biomarker discovery and validation in the context of personalized medicine. The benefits and challenges associated with ddPCR implementation in the clinical setting, mainly when analyzing LBs, are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena-Georgiana Dobre
- Faculty of Biology, University of Bucharest, Splaiul Independentei 91–95, 050095 Bucharest, Romania;
- Correspondence:
| | - Carolina Constantin
- Immunology Department, “Victor Babes” National Institute of Pathology, 050096 Bucharest, Romania;
- Pathology Department, Colentina Clinical Hospital, 020125 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Monica Neagu
- Faculty of Biology, University of Bucharest, Splaiul Independentei 91–95, 050095 Bucharest, Romania;
- Immunology Department, “Victor Babes” National Institute of Pathology, 050096 Bucharest, Romania;
- Pathology Department, Colentina Clinical Hospital, 020125 Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Ma VT, Chamila Perera AA, Sun Y, Sitto M, Waninger JJ, Warrier G, Green MD, Fecher LA, Lao CD. Early Response Assessment in Advanced Stage Melanoma Treated with Combination Ipilimumab/Nivolumab. Front Immunol 2022; 13:860421. [PMID: 35874737 PMCID: PMC9296775 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.860421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2022] [Accepted: 06/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Standard combination ipilimumab/nivolumab (I/N) is given as 4 induction doses for advanced stage melanoma followed by nivolumab single-agent maintenance therapy. While many patients receive less than 4 doses due to immune-related toxicities, it is unclear if fewer doses of I/N may still provide long term clinical benefit. Our aim is to determine if response assessment after 1 or 2 doses of I/N can predict long-term survival and assess if fewer doses of I/N can lead to similar survival outcomes. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis on a cohort of patients with advanced melanoma who w0ere treated with standard I/N. Cox regression of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) models were performed to assess the relationship between response after 1 or 2 doses of I/N and risk of progression and/or death. Clinical benefit response (CBR) was assessed, defined as SD (stable disease) + PR (partial response) + CR (complete response) by imaging. Among patients who achieved a CBR after 1 or 2 doses of I/N, a multivariable Cox regression of survival was used to compare 1 or 2 vs 3 or 4 doses of I/N adjusted by known prognostic variables in advanced melanoma. Results 199 patients were evaluated. Patients with CBR after 1 dose of I/N had improved PFS (HR: 0.16, 95% CI 0.08-0.33; p<0.001) and OS (HR: 0.12, 0.05-0.32; p<0.001) compared to progressive disease (PD). Patients with CBR (vs PD) after 2 doses of I/N also had improved PFS (HR: 0.09, 0.05-0.16; p<0.001) and OS (HR: 0.07, 0.03-0.14; p<0.001). There was no survival risk difference comparing 1 or 2 vs 3 or 4 doses of I/N for PFS (HR: 0.95, 0.37-2.48; p=0.921) and OS (HR: 1.04, 0.22-4.78; p=0.965). Conclusions Early interval imaging with response during induction with I/N may be predictive of long-term survival in advanced stage melanoma. CBR after 1 or 2 doses of I/N is associated with favorable survival outcomes, even in the setting of fewer I/N doses received. Further studies are warranted to evaluate if electively administering fewer combination I/N doses despite tolerance in select patients may balance the benefits of therapy while decreasing toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent T. Ma
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Medical Oncology, and Palliative Care, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
- *Correspondence: Vincent T. Ma,
| | | | - Yilun Sun
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Merna Sitto
- Department of Medical Education, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Jessica J. Waninger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
- Department of Medical Education, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Govind Warrier
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Michael D. Green
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Veteran Affairs Ann Arbor Hospital System, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Leslie A. Fecher
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Christopher D. Lao
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ng MF, Simmons JL, Boyle GM. Heterogeneity in Melanoma. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14123030. [PMID: 35740696 PMCID: PMC9221188 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14123030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2022] [Revised: 06/14/2022] [Accepted: 06/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
There is growing evidence that tumour heterogeneity has an imperative role in cancer development, evolution and resistance to therapy. Continuing advancements in biomedical research enable tumour heterogeneity to be observed and studied more critically. As one of the most heterogeneous human cancers, melanoma displays a high level of biological complexity during disease progression. However, much is still unknown regarding melanoma tumour heterogeneity, as well as the role it plays in disease progression and treatment response. This review aims to provide a concise summary of the importance of tumour heterogeneity in melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mei Fong Ng
- Cancer Drug Mechanisms Group, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia; (M.F.N.); (J.L.S.)
- School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia
| | - Jacinta L. Simmons
- Cancer Drug Mechanisms Group, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia; (M.F.N.); (J.L.S.)
- School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia
- School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia
| | - Glen M. Boyle
- Cancer Drug Mechanisms Group, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia; (M.F.N.); (J.L.S.)
- School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia
- School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Aroldi F, Middleton MR. Long-Term Outcomes of Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in Metastatic Melanoma. Am J Clin Dermatol 2022; 23:331-338. [PMID: 35359259 DOI: 10.1007/s40257-022-00681-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Increasing knowledge about the biology of melanoma and of immunology has led to the development and regulatory approval of the immune checkpoint inhibitors ipilimumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab, which are indicated for the treatment of melanoma irrespective of the B-Raf proto-oncogene mutation status of the tumour. Only a subset of patients will respond, but those who do can expect long-lasting, previously unheard-of responses. Long-term survival results for the registration trials, including CheckMate 067, Keynote-006, and Keynote-001, have recently been published. In particular, the combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab showed an impressive 5-year overall survival of just over 50%. However, toxicity remains a significant concern, with some of the side effects being life threatening and/or life changing. In this review, we discuss the safety and efficacy data of all the agents currently approved for the first-line treatment of advanced melanoma, identifying factors that influence the choice of a single agent rather than combination therapy. We highlight the potential biomarkers of response, effects of long-term toxicity, and options after progression.
Collapse
|
27
|
Signorovitch J, Moshyk A, Zhao J, Le TK, Burns L, Gooden K, Hamilton M. Overall survival in the real-world and clinical trials: a case study validating external controls in advanced melanoma. Future Oncol 2022; 18:1321-1331. [PMID: 35048743 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2021-1054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Aims: We assessed the suitability of real-world data (RWD) as an external control for analysis of overall survival (OS) compared with clinical trial data (CTD) in advanced melanoma. Methods: OS among adults receiving ipilimumab for advanced melanoma was compared between trials (CTD group) and the Flatiron Health database (RWD group) using Cox models. Adjusted analyses accounted for differences in baseline factors; missing data were addressed through multiple imputation. Results: After adjusting for baseline factors and accounting for missingness, OS was similar in the CTD (n = 241) versus RWD groups (n = 816) (hazard ratio: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.75-1.26). Conclusion: Flatiron Health data is suitable to construct external control groups for OS in advanced melanoma trials after adjusting for baseline factors and missing data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Signorovitch
- Analysis Group, Inc., 111 Huntington Ave, Floor 14, Boston, MA 02199, USA
| | - Andriy Moshyk
- Bristol-Myers Squibb, 3401 Princeton Pike, Lawrenceville, NJ 08540, USA
| | - Jing Zhao
- Analysis Group, Inc., 111 Huntington Ave, Floor 14, Boston, MA 02199, USA
| | - Trong Kim Le
- Bristol-Myers Squibb, 3401 Princeton Pike, Lawrenceville, NJ 08540, USA
| | - Leah Burns
- Bristol-Myers Squibb, 3401 Princeton Pike, Lawrenceville, NJ 08540, USA
| | - Kyna Gooden
- Bristol-Myers Squibb, 3401 Princeton Pike, Lawrenceville, NJ 08540, USA
| | - Melissa Hamilton
- Bristol-Myers Squibb, 3401 Princeton Pike, Lawrenceville, NJ 08540, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Economopoulou P, Pantazopoulos A, Spathis A, Kotsantis I, Kyriazoglou A, Kavourakis G, Zakopoulou R, Chatzidakis I, Anastasiou M, Prevezanou M, Resteghini C, Licitra L, Bergamini C, Colombo E, Caspani F, Denaro N, Vecchio S, Bonomo P, Cossu Rocca M, Bertolini F, Ferrari D, Psyrri A, Bossi P. Immunotherapy in Nonendemic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Real-World Data from Two Nonendemic Regions. Cells 2021; 11:32. [PMID: 35011594 PMCID: PMC8750043 DOI: 10.3390/cells11010032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2021] [Revised: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a complex disease entity that mainly predominates in endemic regions. Real-world data with immunotherapy from nonendemic regions are limited. METHODS we collected data from patients with recurrent/metastatic (R/M) NPC treated at a center in Greece and 8 centers in Italy. Between 2016 and 2021, 46 patients who were treated with at least one cycle of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) were identified. Herein, we present our results and a review of the literature. RESULTS assessment of response was available in 42 patients. Overall, 11 patients responded to immunotherapy (Overall Response Rate-ORR 26.2%). Three patients had complete response (CR), and 8 patients had partial response (PR). Disease control rate (DCR) was 61.9%. Median Progression Free Survival (PFS) was 5.6 months and median Overall Survival (OS) was 19.1 months. Responders to ICI improved PFS and OS as compared to that of nonresponders. A lower probability of responding to ICI was shown in patients with more than three metastatic sites (p = 0.073), metastatic disease at initial diagnosis, (p = 0.039) or EBV DNA positive before ICI initiation, (p = 0.074). Decline in EBV DNA levels was found to be statistically significant associated with best response to ICI (p = 0.049). Safety was manageable. CONCLUSIONS among 46 patients with R/M NPC treated with immunotherapy in two nonendemic regions, ORR was 26.2% and durable responses were observed. Low disease burden could serve as a biomarker for response to ICI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Panagiota Economopoulou
- Section of Medical Oncology, Second Department of Internal Medicine, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece; (P.E.); (A.P.); (I.K.); (A.K.); (G.K.); (R.Z.); (I.C.); (M.A.); (M.P.)
| | - Anastasios Pantazopoulos
- Section of Medical Oncology, Second Department of Internal Medicine, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece; (P.E.); (A.P.); (I.K.); (A.K.); (G.K.); (R.Z.); (I.C.); (M.A.); (M.P.)
| | - Aris Spathis
- Second Department of Pathology, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece;
| | - Ioannis Kotsantis
- Section of Medical Oncology, Second Department of Internal Medicine, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece; (P.E.); (A.P.); (I.K.); (A.K.); (G.K.); (R.Z.); (I.C.); (M.A.); (M.P.)
| | - Anastasios Kyriazoglou
- Section of Medical Oncology, Second Department of Internal Medicine, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece; (P.E.); (A.P.); (I.K.); (A.K.); (G.K.); (R.Z.); (I.C.); (M.A.); (M.P.)
| | - George Kavourakis
- Section of Medical Oncology, Second Department of Internal Medicine, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece; (P.E.); (A.P.); (I.K.); (A.K.); (G.K.); (R.Z.); (I.C.); (M.A.); (M.P.)
| | - Roubini Zakopoulou
- Section of Medical Oncology, Second Department of Internal Medicine, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece; (P.E.); (A.P.); (I.K.); (A.K.); (G.K.); (R.Z.); (I.C.); (M.A.); (M.P.)
| | - Ioannis Chatzidakis
- Section of Medical Oncology, Second Department of Internal Medicine, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece; (P.E.); (A.P.); (I.K.); (A.K.); (G.K.); (R.Z.); (I.C.); (M.A.); (M.P.)
| | - Maria Anastasiou
- Section of Medical Oncology, Second Department of Internal Medicine, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece; (P.E.); (A.P.); (I.K.); (A.K.); (G.K.); (R.Z.); (I.C.); (M.A.); (M.P.)
| | - Maria Prevezanou
- Section of Medical Oncology, Second Department of Internal Medicine, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece; (P.E.); (A.P.); (I.K.); (A.K.); (G.K.); (R.Z.); (I.C.); (M.A.); (M.P.)
| | - Carlo Resteghini
- Head and Neck Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Via Venezian 1, 20133 Milan, Italy; (C.R.); (L.L.); (C.B.); (E.C.); (F.C.)
| | - Lisa Licitra
- Head and Neck Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Via Venezian 1, 20133 Milan, Italy; (C.R.); (L.L.); (C.B.); (E.C.); (F.C.)
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Cristiana Bergamini
- Head and Neck Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Via Venezian 1, 20133 Milan, Italy; (C.R.); (L.L.); (C.B.); (E.C.); (F.C.)
| | - Elena Colombo
- Head and Neck Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Via Venezian 1, 20133 Milan, Italy; (C.R.); (L.L.); (C.B.); (E.C.); (F.C.)
| | - Francesca Caspani
- Head and Neck Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Via Venezian 1, 20133 Milan, Italy; (C.R.); (L.L.); (C.B.); (E.C.); (F.C.)
| | - Nerina Denaro
- Medical Oncology Santa Croce and Carle General Hospital Cuneo, 12100 Cuneo, Italy;
| | | | - Pierluigi Bonomo
- Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, 50134 Florence, Italy;
| | - Maria Cossu Rocca
- Department of Medical Oncology, Urogenital and Head and Neck Tumors Medical Treatment, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Federica Bertolini
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, 41125 Modena, Italy;
| | - Daris Ferrari
- Medical Oncology Unit, San Paolo Hospital, 20142 Milan, Italy;
| | - Amanda Psyrri
- Section of Medical Oncology, Second Department of Internal Medicine, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece; (P.E.); (A.P.); (I.K.); (A.K.); (G.K.); (R.Z.); (I.C.); (M.A.); (M.P.)
| | - Paolo Bossi
- Medical Oncology, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia, ASST-Spedali Civili, 25123 Brescia, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Jang SR, Nikita N, Banks J, Keith SW, Johnson JM, Wilson M, Lu-Yao G. Association Between Sex and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Outcomes for Patients With Melanoma. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e2136823. [PMID: 34854905 PMCID: PMC8640892 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.36823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized melanoma treatment and are now standard of care. Although sex is associated with immune function and immune-related diseases, the interaction between sex and ICIs is understudied. OBJECTIVE To examine whether cancer immunotherapy effectiveness varies between female and male patients with advanced melanoma treated with either nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination therapy or anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) therapy (namely, pembrolizumab or nivolumab). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS The study population consisted of 1369 older adults (aged ≥65 years) with a record of melanoma diagnosis from January 1, 1991, to December 31, 2015, in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare linked database. Patients with a diagnosis of stage III or stage IV melanoma and a claims record showing nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination therapy or anti-PD-1 therapy (ie, pembrolizumab or nivolumab) as their last type of ICI prescribed were included in the analyses. Patients were followed up through December 31, 2017, for the overall survival analysis. Statistical analysis was performed from September 19, 2019, to February 20, 2021. EXPOSURES Sex, last prescribed ICI, and prior use of ipilimumab. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was overall survival, defined as time from the index date until death from any cause, with patients censored at the end of the study (December 31, 2017). Cox proportional hazards regression modeling was used to examine the association of sex with ICI outcomes while adjusting for prior use of ipilimumab, age at ICI initiation, Charlson Comorbidity Index, cancer stage at the time of diagnosis, and autoimmune disease diagnosis. RESULTS Among the 1369 patients in the study (982 men [71.7%]; median age, 75 years [IQR, 69-82 years]), the outcome of nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination therapy depended on sex (Wald χ2 = 9.48; P = .009 for interaction). The mortality hazard ratio (HR) for women with prior ipilimumab use receiving combination therapy was 2.06 times (95% CI, 1.28-3.32; P = .003) higher than their male counterparts. No significant difference was observed between women and men receiving anti-PD-1 therapy with (HR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.68-1.38]; P = .85) or without prior ipilimumab use (HR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.67-1.07]; P = .16). For women with prior ipilimumab use, combination therapy was associated with 2.82 times higher mortality hazards than anti-PD-1 therapy (95% CI, 1.73-4.60). No statistically significant difference was seen in mortality risk between anti-PD-1 therapy and combination therapy for men. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This cohort study suggests that female patients with advanced melanoma may not benefit as much from combination ICIs as male patients would. Tumor mutation burden or estrogen level may serve as an important biomarker associated with ICI response in metastatic melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Se Ryeong Jang
- Franchise Health Economics and Market Access, Ethicon, Raritan, New Jersey
- College of Population Health, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Nikita Nikita
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Joshua Banks
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Scott W. Keith
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jennifer M. Johnson
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Melissa Wilson
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- St Luke’s Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, St Luke’s University Health Network, Easton, Pennsylvania
| | - Grace Lu-Yao
- College of Population Health, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Roudi R, D'Angelo A, Sirico M, Sobhani N. Immunotherapeutic treatments in hepatocellular carcinoma; achievements, challenges and future prospects. Int Immunopharmacol 2021; 101:108322. [PMID: 34735916 DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2021.108322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Revised: 10/25/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common and fatal malignancies with an alarming trend all around the world. Common therapeutic approaches in the early stage of disease are surgical resection, ablation, and liver transplantation. Due to the insidious identity of HCC, the majority of the patients are diagnosed at advanced stages, where tumor spreading, or distant metastasis unfortunately have already occurred. Immunotherapeutic options have elicited a promising approach in some malignancies with Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approving the first checkpoint inhibitor anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) ipilimumab for the treatment of melanoma ten years ago. In the past decade, many clinical trials have been investigating anti-CTLA-4 as well as anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) therapies in various solid tumors, including HCC. In this mini-review we will discuss the latest clinical data from clinical trials for immune-checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raheleh Roudi
- Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
| | - Alberto D'Angelo
- Department of Biology & Biochemistry, University of Bath, Bath BA2-7AX, UK
| | - Marianna Sirico
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Via P. Maroncelli 40, 47014 Meldola, Italy
| | - Navid Sobhani
- Department of Medicine, Section of Epidemiology and Population Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Washino S, Takeshita H, Inoue M, Kagawa M, Soma T, Yamada H, Kageyama Y, Miyagawa T, Kawakami S. Real-World Incidence of Immune-Related Adverse Events Associated with Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Observational Study. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10204767. [PMID: 34682890 PMCID: PMC8541457 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10204767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2021] [Revised: 10/15/2021] [Accepted: 10/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Real-world incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) associated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has been rarely demonstrated. The present study aims to report the safety outcomes of this combination therapy in the real-life population. We conducted a multi-institutional retrospective observational study that assessed the incidence and severity of irAEs associated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab in 41 Japanese patients with metastatic and/or locally advanced RCC. The irAEs were classified into endocrine and non-endocrine irAEs. The median age and follow-up period were 68 years and 13.0 months, respectively. Endocrine irAEs were observed in 66% of patients, including hypopituitarism in 44%, hyperthyroidism in 41%, and primary hypothyroidism in 22%, while non-endocrine irAEs were observed in 54%. All patients experiencing hypopituitarism presented with adrenocorticotropic hormone deficiency, causing secondary adrenal insufficiency, which required permanent corticosteroid replacement therapy. There was an association between the incidence of endocrine irAEs and high-grade non-endocrine irAEs other than skin-related irAEs (p = 0.027). When patients experienced two or more endocrine irAEs, they had a 35% chance of experiencing high-grade non-endocrine irAEs other than skin-related irAEs. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab may lead to a high prevalence of endocrine irAEs in “real-world” patients. Endocrine irAEs may be associated with non-endocrine irAEs other than skin-related irAEs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satoshi Washino
- Department of Urology, Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama 330-0834, Japan;
- Correspondence:
| | - Hideki Takeshita
- Department of Urology, Saitama Medical Center Saitama Medical University, Kawagoe 350-8550, Japan; (H.T.); (M.K.); (S.K.)
| | - Masaharu Inoue
- Department of Urology, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama 362-0806, Japan; (M.I.); (T.S.); (Y.K.)
| | - Makoto Kagawa
- Department of Urology, Saitama Medical Center Saitama Medical University, Kawagoe 350-8550, Japan; (H.T.); (M.K.); (S.K.)
| | - Takahiko Soma
- Department of Urology, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama 362-0806, Japan; (M.I.); (T.S.); (Y.K.)
| | - Hodaka Yamada
- Department of Endocrinology, Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama 330-0834, Japan;
| | - Yukio Kageyama
- Department of Urology, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama 362-0806, Japan; (M.I.); (T.S.); (Y.K.)
| | - Tomoaki Miyagawa
- Department of Urology, Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama 330-0834, Japan;
| | - Satoru Kawakami
- Department of Urology, Saitama Medical Center Saitama Medical University, Kawagoe 350-8550, Japan; (H.T.); (M.K.); (S.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Dobre EG, Constantin C, Costache M, Neagu M. Interrogating Epigenome toward Personalized Approach in Cutaneous Melanoma. J Pers Med 2021; 11:901. [PMID: 34575678 PMCID: PMC8467841 DOI: 10.3390/jpm11090901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2021] [Revised: 09/06/2021] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Epigenetic alterations have emerged as essential contributors in the pathogenesis of various human diseases, including cutaneous melanoma (CM). Unlike genetic changes, epigenetic modifications are highly dynamic and reversible and thus easy to regulate. Here, we present a comprehensive review of the latest research findings on the role of genetic and epigenetic alterations in CM initiation and development. We believe that a better understanding of how aberrant DNA methylation and histone modifications, along with other molecular processes, affect the genesis and clinical behavior of CM can provide the clinical management of this disease a wide range of diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers, as well as potential therapeutic targets that can be used to prevent or abrogate drug resistance. We will also approach the modalities by which these epigenetic alterations can be used to customize the therapeutic algorithms in CM, the current status of epi-therapies, and the preliminary results of epigenetic and traditional combinatorial pharmacological approaches in this fatal disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena-Georgiana Dobre
- Faculty of Biology, University of Bucharest, Splaiul Independentei 91–95, 050095 Bucharest, Romania; (M.C.); (M.N.)
| | - Carolina Constantin
- Immunology Department, “Victor Babes” National Institute of Pathology, 050096 Bucharest, Romania;
- Pathology Department, Colentina Clinical Hospital, 020125 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Marieta Costache
- Faculty of Biology, University of Bucharest, Splaiul Independentei 91–95, 050095 Bucharest, Romania; (M.C.); (M.N.)
| | - Monica Neagu
- Faculty of Biology, University of Bucharest, Splaiul Independentei 91–95, 050095 Bucharest, Romania; (M.C.); (M.N.)
- Immunology Department, “Victor Babes” National Institute of Pathology, 050096 Bucharest, Romania;
- Pathology Department, Colentina Clinical Hospital, 020125 Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Exploratory analysis of clinical benefit of ipilimumab and nivolumab treatment in patients with metastatic melanoma from a single institution. Clin Transl Oncol 2021; 24:319-330. [PMID: 34420138 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-021-02692-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 08/02/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We retrospectively analysed overall survival (OS) and potential predictive biomarkers of OS in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with ipilimumab plus nivolumab in a single institution. METHODS AND PATIENTS Electronic medical records of patients with advanced melanoma receiving ≥ 1 dose of a combined ipilimumab plus nivolumab regimen between March 3, 2016 and March 7, 2020 in a single institution, were reviewed. OS was analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Sub-group analyses were conducted to examine several endpoints according to relevant clinical, molecular and pathological variables using logistic and Cox models. RESULTS Forty-four cases were reviewed, 38 (86.4%), of whom had cutaneous melanoma, 21 (47.7%) were BRAF mutant, 21 (47.7%) presented high lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) values, 23 (52.3%) had ≥ 3 disease sites, and 10 (22.7%) patients had brain metastases. The median follow-up was 37.7 months, and the median OS was 21.1 months (95% CI 8.2-NR). In the multivariate analysis, the OS was significantly longer in patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of 0, LDH ≤ upper limit of normal, absence of liver metastases and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) < 5 (all p ≤ 0.05, log-rank test). These factors allowed the classification of patients into three prognostic risk groups (low/intermediate/high risk) for death. CONCLUSION Overall survival of real-world patients from our cohort receiving ipilimumab plus nivolumab was lower than in previous studies. The ECOG score, LDH values, the presence of liver metastases and the NLR were independent prognostic factors for survival.
Collapse
|
34
|
Ksienski D, Truong PT, Wai ES, Croteau NS, Chan A, Patterson T, Clarkson M, Hackett S, Irons S, Lesperance M. Survival Outcomes Following Discontinuation of Ipilimumab and Nivolumab for Advanced Melanoma in a Population-based Cohort. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2021; 33:e561-e569. [PMID: 34226113 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2021.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2020] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Induction ipilimumab and nivolumab followed by maintenance nivolumab improve overall survival compared with ipilimumab alone in patients with advanced melanoma, but immune-related adverse events (irAE) occur commonly. The need for induction discontinuation because of irAE and the relationship between irAE and survival in non-trials patients are unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with unresectable stage III-IV melanoma receiving first-line combination immunotherapy at one of six centres between December 2017 and February 2020 outside of trials were identified retrospectively. Landmark 12-week Kaplan-Meier analyses and log-rank tests were used to evaluate associations between discontinuation of induction therapy on overall survival and time to treatment failure (TTF). Multivariable analysis of factors influencing overall survival and TTF was undertaken. RESULTS Among 95 patients, the median age was 62 years, 38.9% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥1 and 22.1% had brain metastases. The median follow-up for the whole cohort was 19.8 months by the reverse Kaplan-Meier method. Any grade and grade 3-4 irAE were noted in 78.9% and 44.2% of the cohort, respectively. 44.2% of patients completed induction immunotherapy, whereas 41.1% did not due to irAE. Twelve-week landmark overall survival and TTF were similar in patients who completed induction versus those who did not due to irAE. On multivariable analysis, any grade irAE (versus none) was associated with longer overall survival (hazard ratio = 0.35, 95% confidence interval 0.15-0.82, P = 0.02) and TTF (hazard ratio = 0.38, 95% confidence interval = 0.17-0.81, P = 0.01). Grade 3-4 irAE correlated with longer TTF (hazard ratio = 0.45, 95% confidence interval = 0.20-1.01, P = 0.05). CONCLUSION In this population-based cohort, discontinuation of induction immunotherapy as a result of irAE did not adversely affect overall survival or TTF. irAE observed during ipilimumab and nivolumab induction were associated with improved survival outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Ksienski
- BC Cancer-Victoria, British Columbia, Canada; University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada.
| | - P T Truong
- BC Cancer-Victoria, British Columbia, Canada; University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
| | - E S Wai
- BC Cancer-Victoria, British Columbia, Canada; University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
| | - N S Croteau
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology & Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
| | - A Chan
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer-Surrey, British Columbia, Canada
| | - T Patterson
- BC Cancer-Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| | - M Clarkson
- BC Cancer-Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| | - S Hackett
- BC Cancer-Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| | - S Irons
- BC Cancer-Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| | - M Lesperance
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Asher N, Israeli-Weller N, Shapira-Frommer R, Ben-Betzalel G, Schachter J, Meirson T, Markel G. Immunotherapy Discontinuation in Metastatic Melanoma: Lessons from Real-Life Clinical Experience. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13123074. [PMID: 34203061 PMCID: PMC8234591 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13123074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2021] [Revised: 06/13/2021] [Accepted: 06/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Metastatic melanoma patients derive unprecedented benefit from immunotherapy, and some of them are even considered cured. Currently, there is no consensus on the safety nor on the timing of treatment discontinuation in this population. This is a real-world study on 106 advanced melanoma patients who were treated with immunotherapy for a median of 15.2 months, and who discontinued treatments in the absence of disease progression. We found that after a median follow up of 20.8 m from discontinuation, 32% had progressed. The results of this study reveal the key factors to bear in mind when considering an elective treatment cessation. Namely, patients with non-CR as best response and patients treated in an advanced-line setting should be treated for longer periods, and elective discontinuation should not take place prior to 18 m. Abstract Background: Immunotherapy has revolutionized outcomes for melanoma patients, by significantly prolonging survival and probably even curing a fraction of metastatic patients. In daily practice, treatment for responding patients is often discontinued due to treatment-limiting toxicity, or electively, following a major tumor response. To date, the criteria for a safe stop and the optimal duration of treatment remain unclear. Patients and methods: This is a real-world single-site cohort of 106 advanced melanoma patients who were treated with immunotherapy and who discontinued treatments in the absence of disease progression. Here, we describe their long-term outcomes, and analyze the differential characteristics between patients who ultimately experienced progression and those who remained in unmaintained durable response. Results: Patients were treated with anti-PD-1 monotherapy (81%) or in combination with ipilimumab (19%) for a median of 15.2 m (range, 0.7–42.3 m). Upon discontinuation, 75.5% had achieved a complete response (CR). After a median follow-up of 20.8 m (range, 6–58) from discontinuation, 32% experienced disease progression. Median time to progression was 8.5 m (range, 1.5–37). Response to re-induction with anti-PD-1 was observed in 47%. On multivariate analysis, achieving a non-CR response, immunotherapy given in advanced line, and shorter treatment duration were significantly associated with lesser progression-free survival. Conclusions: This is one of the few reports on real-world melanoma patients who discontinued immunotherapy while responding to treatment. This study reveals the key factors to bear in mind when considering an elective treatment cessation. Specifically, patients with non-CR as best response and patients treated in an advanced-line setting should be treated for longer periods, and elective discontinuation should not take place prior to 18 m.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nethanel Asher
- Ella Lemelbaum Institute for Immuno-Oncology in Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan 526000, Israel; (R.S.-F.); (G.B.-B.); (J.S.); (T.M.)
- Correspondence: (N.A.); (G.M.); Tel.: +97-25-2666-9283 (N.A.); Fax: +97-235304934 (N.A.)
| | - Noa Israeli-Weller
- Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva 49100, Israel;
| | - Ronnie Shapira-Frommer
- Ella Lemelbaum Institute for Immuno-Oncology in Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan 526000, Israel; (R.S.-F.); (G.B.-B.); (J.S.); (T.M.)
| | - Guy Ben-Betzalel
- Ella Lemelbaum Institute for Immuno-Oncology in Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan 526000, Israel; (R.S.-F.); (G.B.-B.); (J.S.); (T.M.)
| | - Jacob Schachter
- Ella Lemelbaum Institute for Immuno-Oncology in Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan 526000, Israel; (R.S.-F.); (G.B.-B.); (J.S.); (T.M.)
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 6997801, Israel
| | - Tomer Meirson
- Ella Lemelbaum Institute for Immuno-Oncology in Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan 526000, Israel; (R.S.-F.); (G.B.-B.); (J.S.); (T.M.)
- Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Zfat 1311502, Israel
| | - Gal Markel
- Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva 49100, Israel;
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 6997801, Israel
- The Department of Clinical Microbiology and Immunology, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 6997801, Israel
- Correspondence: (N.A.); (G.M.); Tel.: +97-25-2666-9283 (N.A.); Fax: +97-235304934 (N.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Piercey O, Tomaszewski JM, Smith K. Intracranial response after extracranial radiation in a patient with rapidly progressing metastatic melanoma. BMJ Case Rep 2021; 14:e240921. [PMID: 34088687 PMCID: PMC8183279 DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2020-240921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Growing literature supports the synergistic effect of radiation as a primer for renewed enhanced systemic immunological responses in patients receiving immunotherapy for metastatic melanoma. Radiographic regression of extracranial tumours after treatment of intracranial metastatic lesions has been reported and these observations point to an abscopal effect that traverses the blood-brain barrier. We describe a patient with rapidly progressing metastatic melanoma despite combined immune checkpoint blockade, who achieved a complete metabolic response of both his extracranial and intracranial disease after the commencement of palliative radiation to his axilla. This is the first published case, to our knowledge, of a sustained, complete intracranial abscopal response from extracranial radiation. We discuss potential mechanistic relations between radiation, the blood-brain barrier and the abscopal effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Piercey
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Kortnye Smith
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Ballarat Regional Integrated Cancer Centre, Ballarat Health Services, Ballarat, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Percik R, Nethanel A, Liel Y. Capillary-leak syndrome: an unrecognized early immune adverse effect of checkpoint-inhibitors treatment. Immunotherapy 2021; 13:653-659. [PMID: 33847145 DOI: 10.2217/imt-2020-0332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Capillary-leak syndrome is strongly associated with cytokine activity states. It is an ill-recognized adverse effect of checkpoint inhibitors treatment, which are typically associated with cellular immune response. We describe two patients with capillary leak syndrome following immune checkpoint inhibitors treatment. We present linking mechanisms between checkpoint inhibitors, cellular immunity, cytokine action and endothelial damage. We suggest that capillary-leak syndrome is a unique adverse effect of immunotherapy, resulting from complex interactions between cellular and cytokine activation and that its expression is probably depending on inherent host immune variabilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth Percik
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Endo-Oncology Clinic, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Asher Nethanel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- The Ella Lemelbaum Institute for Immuno-Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| | - Yair Liel
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of The Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Immune Check-Point Inhibitors and Standard Chemoradiotherapy in Definitive Head and Neck Cancer Treatment. J Pers Med 2021; 11:jpm11050393. [PMID: 34068797 PMCID: PMC8151395 DOI: 10.3390/jpm11050393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2021] [Revised: 04/22/2021] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
In head and neck cancer management, there is a need for tailored approaches to optimally implement clinical outcomes. Based on the assumption that efficacy and long-term toxicity are not satisfactory for standard concurrent platinum-based chemoradiotherapy, several trials have been designed to test whether induction immunotherapy and/or concomitant immunotherapy and radiotherapy result in improved survival and toxicity outcomes. Here, we present an overview of the most recent concomitant therapeutic strategies for head and neck cancer, focusing on the knowledge available regarding check-point inhibitors. The aim is to present the characteristics of the main check-point inhibitors and to summarize the clinical trials on the combination of immune check-point inhibitors and (chemo)radiotherapy in the definitive HNC setting, in order to provide a useful clinical tool for further research.
Collapse
|
39
|
Jim HSL, Eisel SL, Hoogland AI, Shaw S, King JC, Dicker AP. Use of a Cancer Registry to Evaluate Patient-Reported Outcomes of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 13:E103. [PMID: 33396286 PMCID: PMC7795027 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13010103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2020] [Accepted: 12/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are increasingly used for advanced lung cancer, but few studies have reported on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) outside the context of a clinical trial. The goal of the current study was to assess PROs in participants of a lung cancer registry who had been treated with an ICI. Patients participating in the GO2 Foundation's Lung Cancer Registry who reported receiving atezolizumab, durvalumab, nivolumab, or pembrolizumab were invited to participate in a survey about their experiences during treatment. Quality of life was evaluated using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). Common symptomatic adverse events were evaluated using an item bank generated for ICIs. Internationally, 226 patients (mean age 61, 75% female) participated. Patients reported worse quality of life at the time of assessment than U.S. population and cancer normative samples. The most common moderate to severe adverse events during ICI treatment were fatigue (41%), aching joints (27%), and aching muscles (20%). Due to toxicity, 25% reported a treatment delay, 11% an emergency room visit, and 9% a hospitalization. This study is among the first to our knowledge to report on PROs of ICIs outside the context of a clinical trial. Results suggest higher rates of adverse events than previously reported in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather S. L. Jim
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Tampa, FL 33612, USA; (S.L.E.); (A.I.H.)
| | - Sarah L. Eisel
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Tampa, FL 33612, USA; (S.L.E.); (A.I.H.)
| | - Aasha I. Hoogland
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Tampa, FL 33612, USA; (S.L.E.); (A.I.H.)
| | - Sandra Shaw
- GO2 Foundation for Lung Cancer, Washington, DC 20006, USA; (S.S.); (J.C.K.)
| | - Jennifer C. King
- GO2 Foundation for Lung Cancer, Washington, DC 20006, USA; (S.S.); (J.C.K.)
| | - Adam P. Dicker
- Jefferson Center for Digital Health, Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA;
| |
Collapse
|