Antibody-Drug Conjugates for the Treatment of Breast Cancer

Cardiac toxicity of brentuximab vedotin: a real-word disproportionality analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database

Brentuximab vedotin (BV) has obtained approval for the therapeutic management of classical Hodgkin lymphoma as well as systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Given the inherent constraints of conventional clinical trials, the correlation between BV and cardiac adverse events (AEs) remains enigmatic. The objective of this investigation is to comprehensively assess cardiac AEs attributed to BV by employing advanced data mining techniques, utilizing the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). The indices for the assessment of disproportionality encompass the reporting odds ratio (ROR), the proportional reporting ratio, the information component, and the empirical Bayesian geometric mean. Employing these sophisticated metrics, we gauged the extent of disproportionate occurrences. The dataset was sourced from the FAERS from the first quarter of 2012 to first quarter of 2023, facilitating a comprehensive analysis of the potential correlation between BV and cardiac AEs. This scrutiny encompassed a comparative analysis of both cardiac and non-cardiac AEs. A total of 495 cases of BV's cardiac AEs were discerned, with the identification of 31 preferred terms (PTs). Among these, 8 PTs emerged as conspicuous signals of cardiac AEs, notably encompassing ventricular hypokinesia (ROR 7.59), tachyarrhythmia (ROR 7.06), sinus tachycardia (ROR 6.18), cardiopulmonary failure (ROR 4.44), pericardial effusion (ROR 4.32), acute coronary syndrome (ROR 4.02), cardiomyopathy (ROR 3.30), and tachycardia (ROR 2.76). The manifestation of severe outcomes demonstrates a discernible correlation with the cardiac AEs (P < 0.001). Our investigation furnishes invaluable insights for healthcare practitioners to proactively mitigate the incidence of BV-associated cardiac AEs.

Trastuzumab deruxtecan in breast cancer

Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) consisting of a humanised, anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) monoclonal antibody covalently linked to a topoisomerase I inhibitor cytotoxic payload (DXd). The high drug-to-antibody ratio (8:1) ensures a high DXd concentration is delivered to target tumour cells, following internalisation of T-DXd and subsequent cleavage of its tetrapeptide-based linker. DXd's membrane-permeable nature enables it to cross cell membranes and potentially exert antitumour activity on surrounding tumour cells regardless of HER2 expression. T-DXd's unique mechanism of action is reflected in its efficacy in clinical trials in patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer (in heavily pretreated populations and in those previously treated with a taxane and trastuzumab), as well as HER2-low metastatic breast cancer. Thus, ADCs such as T-DXd have the potential to change the treatment paradigm of targeting HER2 in metastatic breast cancer, including eventually within the adjuvant/neoadjuvant setting.

Advancing HER2-low breast cancer management: enhancing diagnosis and treatment strategies

BACKGROUND

Recent evidence brought by novel anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) antibody-drug conjugates is leading to significant changes in HER2-negative breast cancer (BC) best practices. A new targetable category termed 'HER2-low' has been identified in tumors previously classified as 'HER2-negative'. Daily practice in pathology and medical oncology is expected to align to current recommendations, but patient access to novel anticancer drugs across geographies might be impeded due to local challenges.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An expert meeting involving ten regional pathology and oncology opinion leaders experienced in BC management in four Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) countries (Bulgaria, Croatia, Serbia, Slovenia) was held. Herein we summarized the current situation of HER2-low metastatic BC (mBC), local challenges, and action plans to prevent delays in patient access to testing and treatment based on expert opinion.

RESULTS

Gaps and differences at multiple levels were identified across the four countries. These included variability in the local HER2-low epidemiology data, certification of pathology laboratories and quality control, and reimbursement conditions of testing and anticancer drugs for HER2-negative mBC. While clinical decisions were aligned to international guidelines in use, optimal access to testing and innovative treatment was restricted due to significant delays in reimbursement or limitative reimbursement conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

Preventing delays in HER2-low mBC patient access to diagnosis and novel treatments is crucial to optimize outcomes. Multidisciplinary joint efforts and pro-active discussions between clinicians and decision makers are needed to improve care of HER2-low mBC patients in CEE countries.

[Treatment-related adverse events associated with antibody drug conjugate in breast cancer]

Therapeutic options for breast cancer have recently been enriched by new antibody-drug conjugates (ADC), which are now being utilized across all known molecular subtypes. ADCs represent a groundbreaking class of therapies that combine a cytotoxic agent with a monoclonal antibody via a combination molecule (linker). The primary objective is to selectively deliver chemotherapy to cells expressing the target antigen, thereby enhancing the therapeutic index. Trastuzumab-emtansine marked the pioneering use of this approach for HER2-overexpressed breast cancer. More recently, trastuzumab-deruxtecan and sacituzumab-govitecan have demonstrated efficacy in progression-free survival and overall survival in HER2-overexpressed and HER2-low breast cancer for the former, and HER2-non-overexpressed (including HER-low) for the latter. Numerous other ADCs are currently under development in breast cancer. While ADCs were initially designed to widen the therapeutic index and mitigate toxicities, managing ADC-related adverse events in the clinical setting remains a challenge. This review article aims to provide an overview of the toxicity profiles of these drugs already in current clinical practice or under development, drawing from results observed in various studies.

Incidence of antibody-drug conjugate-related fatigue in patients with breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Numerous studies have reported the efficacy of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) for treating breast cancer. However, during cytotoxic drug treatment, long-term disabling fatigue is common. Moreover, studies in the relevant literature have indicated that fatigue can significantly increase the incidence of depression and sleep disorders. Therefore, this meta-analysis aims to evaluate the incidence of fatigue in breast cancer survivors treated with ADCs.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for articles and conference abstracts published before March 16, 2023. Further, two authors independently extracted data from the included studies. The primary outcome of this study was the incidence of all-grade fatigue caused by the use of ADCs in patients with breast cancer. Finally, a random-effects model was used to calculate the incidence and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the outcome.

RESULTS

Overall, 7963 patients from 31 studies were included in this meta-analysis to assess the incidence of fatigue caused by the use of approved and marketed ADCs in patients with breast cancer. Notably, the incidence of all-grade fatigue during ADC monotherapy was 39.84% (95% CI, 35.09%-44.69%). In subgroup analyses, among ADCs, the incidence of trastuzumab deruxtecan-induced fatigue was the highest, with an all-grade fatigue incidence of 47.05% (95% CI, 42.38%-51.75%). Meanwhile, the incidence of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1)-induced all-grade fatigue was 35.17% (95% CI, 28.87%-41.74%), which was the lowest among ADCs. Further, the incidence of all-grade fatigue due to sacituzumab govitecan was 42.82% (95% CI, 34.54%-51.32%), which was higher than that due to T-DM1. Moreover, the incidence of fatigue was higher with T-DM1 combination therapy than with monotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians have highlighted the high incidence of ADC-related fatigue and its negative impact on patients' physical and mental health, making fatigue an important research variable. The results of this study will further contribute to a comprehensive understanding of ADCs, which have some clinical importance and are of great benefit to patients with breast cancer.

The therapeutic potential of natural metabolites in targeting endocrine-independent HER-2-negative breast cancer

Breast cancer (BC) is a heterogenous disease, with prognosis and treatment options depending on Estrogen, Progesterone receptor, and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2 (HER-2) status. HER-2 negative, endocrine-independent BC presents a significant clinical challenge with limited treatment options. To date, promising strategies like immune checkpoint inhibitors have not yielded breakthroughs in patient prognosis. Despite being considered archaic, agents derived from natural sources, mainly plants, remain backbone of current treatment. In this context, we critically analyze novel naturally-derived drug candidates, elucidate their intricate mechanisms of action, and evaluate their pre-clinical in vitro and in vivo activity in endocrine-independent HER-2 negative BC. Since pre-clinical research success often does not directly correlate with drug approval, we focus on ongoing clinical trials to uncover current trends. Finally, we demonstrate the potential of combining cutting-edge technologies, such as antibody-drug conjugates or nanomedicine, with naturally-derived agents, offering new opportunities that utilize both traditional cytotoxic agents and new metabolites.

Drug conjugates for the treatment of lung cancer: from drug discovery to clinical practice

A drug conjugate consists of a cytotoxic drug bound via a linker to a targeted ligand, allowing the targeted delivery of the drug to one or more tumor sites. This approach simultaneously reduces drug toxicity and increases efficacy, with a powerful combination of efficient killing and precise targeting. Antibody‒drug conjugates (ADCs) are the best-known type of drug conjugate, combining the specificity of antibodies with the cytotoxicity of chemotherapeutic drugs to reduce adverse reactions by preferentially targeting the payload to the tumor. The structure of ADCs has also provided inspiration for the development of additional drug conjugates. In recent years, drug conjugates such as ADCs, peptide‒drug conjugates (PDCs) and radionuclide drug conjugates (RDCs) have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The scope and application of drug conjugates have been expanding, including combination therapy and precise drug delivery, and a variety of new conjugation technology concepts have emerged. Additionally, new conjugation technology-based drugs have been developed in industry. In addition to chemotherapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy, drug conjugate therapy has undergone continuous development and made significant progress in treating lung cancer in recent years, offering a promising strategy for the treatment of this disease. In this review, we discuss recent advances in the use of drug conjugates for lung cancer treatment, including structure-based drug design, mechanisms of action, clinical trials, and side effects. Furthermore, challenges, potential approaches and future prospects are presented.

Antibody-drug conjugates in HER-2 negative breast cancers with poor prognosis

Antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) comprise a rapidly growing class of targeted drugs that selectively deliver a cytotoxic agent to cancer cells, reducing the side effects associated with conventional chemotherapy. Breast cancer (BC) is a heterogeneous entity. The need for effective therapies for HER-2 negative BCs with poor prognosis, such as triple-negative or endocrine-resistant BC, remains unmet due to the lack of potential targets for treatments. These BC subtypes are not candidates for hormonal or anti-HER-2 agents. However, ongoing clinical trials exploring the use of ADCs with a wide range of targets have shown potential for this treatment modality. In this review, we present the current state of knowledge regarding the role of ADC and speculate on novel approaches including ADC combination therapies, new molecular targets, and the role of other subclasses of ADCs (bicycle drug conjugates, bispecific ADCs, immune modulating ADCs) in this clinical scenario.

HPLC-DAD validated method for DM4 and its metabolite S-Me-DM4 quantification in biological matrix for clinical and pharmaceutical applications

The present study focuses on the development and validation of an HPLC-DAD methodology for the detection of a potent chemotherapeutic agent, Maytansinoid Ravtansine (DM4), and its metabolite, S-methyl-DM4 (S-Me-DM4), in plasma samples. Methodologically, after a simple protein precipitation with acetonitrile and after drying 1 mL of supernatant, the sample (suspended with N,N-Dimethylacetamide, DMA) was directly analyzed by HPLC under isocratic elution using a mobile phase comprising milliQ water and methanol (25:75, v:v), both acidified with 0.1 % v:v formic acid. Employing a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min and a reversed-phase GraceSmart RP18 column thermostated at 40 °C, we achieved complete resolution and separation of DM4 and S-Me-DM4 within 13 min. The optimized injection volume of 20 μL and the wavelength set at 254 nm were utilized for quantitative analyses. Rigorous validation has not only ensured its reliability and reproducibility but has also addressed potential limitations associated with methodological inconsistency. The limit of detection and quantification of the method were 0.025 and 0.06 μg/mL for both the analytes, respectively. The calibration curve showed a good linearity in the range 0.06-20 μg/mL. For both analytes, the intraday precision and trueness were 2.3-8.2 % and -1.1 to 3.1 %, respectively, while the interday values were 0.7-10.1 % and -10.4 to 7.5 %, respectively. The developed methodology enables the concurrent determination and quantification of free DM4 and its metabolite, free S-Me-DM4, making it a valuable tool for assessing the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of DM4-based therapies. In addition, the procedure was successfully applied to analyse the presence of free DM4 or its metabolite, free S-Me-DM4, in human plasma samples spiked with the 1959-sss/DM4 antibody-drug conjugate (ADC). The utilization of the herein validated methodology allowed to confirm the presence of these analytes, thereby providing insights into their potential release from the ADC structure.

Management of patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer after trastuzumab deruxtecan failure

The current treatment of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive advanced breast cancer (ABC) has been greatly impacted in the past decade by the introduction of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), which represent a relatively novel therapeutic class with the peculiar ability to deliver otherwise overtly toxic chemotherapeutics to tumor sites by exploiting the specificities of monoclonal antibodies. Indeed, drug engineering refinements in ADC design, such as through the introduction of cleavable linkers and hydrophobic payloads, resulted in improved patient outcomes in recent years. Two different ADCs, namely trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) and trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), have already entered clinical practice for the treatment of HER2-positive ABC. In this scenario, T-DXd has shown to portend better survival outcomes compared to T-DM1, while leaving a large unsought area of unmet medical need upon T-DXd failure. Treatment decision and benefit of cancer drugs following T-DXd still represent an area of clinical controversy, where a preclinical investigation and clinical development should be prioritized. As the pace of innovation is currently accelerating, and with novel ADC formulations advancing in early-phase clinical trials, the whole BC field is changing at an unprecedented rate, with potential broadenings of therapeutic indications. In this review, we present the clinical landscape of HER2-positive advanced BC and discuss our vision on how to tackle T-DXd resistance, providing a perspective on the priority areas of the cancer research in this setting.

Agnostic Approvals in Oncology: Getting the Right Drug to the Right Patient with the Right Genomics

(1) Background: The oncology field has drastically changed with the advent of precision medicine, led by the discovery of druggable genes or immune targets assessed through next-generation sequencing. Biomarker-based treatments are increasingly emerging, and currently, six tissue-agnostic therapies are FDA-approved. (2) Methods: We performed a review of the literature and reported the trials that led to the approval of tissue-agnostic treatments and ongoing clinical trials currently investigating novel biomarker-based approaches. (3) Results: We discussed the approval of agnostic treatments: pembrolizumab and dostarlimab for MMRd/MSI-H, pembrolizumab for TMB-H, larotrectinib and entrectinib for NTRK-fusions, dabrafenib plus trametinib for BRAF V600E mutation, and selpercatinib for RET fusions. In addition, we reported novel clinical trials of biomarker-based approaches, including ALK, HER2, FGFR, and NRG1. (4) Conclusions: Precision medicine is constantly evolving, and with the improvement of diagnostic tools that allow a wider genomic definition of the tumor, tissue-agnostic targeted therapies are a promising treatment strategy tailored to the specific tumor genomic profile, leading to improved survival outcomes.

Advances in Targeted Therapy of Breast Cancer with Antibody-Drug Conjugate

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are a potential and promising therapy for a wide variety of cancers, including breast cancer. ADC-based drugs represent a rapidly growing field of breast cancer therapy. Various ADC drug therapies have progressed over the past decade and have generated diverse opportunities for designing of state-of-the-art ADCs. Clinical progress with ADCs for the targeted therapy of breast cancer have shown promise. Off-target toxicities and drug resistance to ADC-based therapy have hampered effective therapy development due to the intracellular mechanism of action and limited antigen expression on breast tumors. However, innovative non-internalizing ADCs targeting the tumor microenvironment (TME) component and extracellular payload delivery mechanisms have led to reduced drug resistance and enhanced ADC effectiveness. Novel ADC drugs may deliver potent cytotoxic agents to breast tumor cells with reduced off-target effects, which may overcome difficulties related to delivery efficiency and enhance the therapeutic efficacy of cytotoxic cancer drugs for breast cancer therapy. This review discusses the development of ADC-based targeted breast cancer therapy and the clinical translation of ADC drugs for breast cancer treatment.

HER2-Low Breast Cancer: a New Subtype?

OPINION STATEMENT

Breast cancer (BC) guidelines subdivide the disease into three main groups, namely hormone receptor (HR)-positive HER2-negative, HER2-positive, and triple-negative BC (TNBC). The natural history of the HER2-positive subtype has changed since the introduction of HER-targeted therapies, which demonstrated benefit only in case of HER2 overexpression (IHC, score 3+) or gene amplification. Such observation may depend on direct drug inhibition of HER2 downstream signaling, which is needed for survival and proliferation in HER2-addicted BC. Clinically focused categories cannot comprehensively describe biology, as almost half of the currently defined HER2-negative BCs show some degree of IHC expression and have been recently renamed as HER2-low. Why? As technological breakthroughs enable the synthesis of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), target antigens may be viewed not only as a biological switch to be turned on-off by targeted drugs but also as an anchor for ADC docking and tethering. As trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) has already proven in the clinical trial DESTINY-Breast04, even fewer HER2 available receptors on cancer cells may be sufficient for a clinical benefit. So, for HR-negative HER2-low subtype (~40% of TNBCs), though only 58 patients had been enrolled in DESTINY-Breast04, the observed benefit, together with the dismal prognosis of TNBC, warrants the use of T-DXd. Notably, another topoisomerase-based ADC, sacituzumab govitecan, has already been granted approval for pretreated TNBC (ASCENT). As no head-to-head comparison has been performed, the choice relies on regulatory approvals at the time of patient assessment, critical appraisal of available evidence, and careful evaluation of possible cross-resistance with sequential use of ADCs. As for HR-positive HER2-low disease (~60% of HR-positive tumors), DESTINY-Breast04 provides solid evidence for T-DXd prioritization in either second or third treatment lines. Although the remarkable activity observed in this setting favorably compares with outcomes observed in treatment-naive patients, the ongoing DESTINY-Breast06 will clarify the role of T-DXd in this population.

Prognostic and Predictive Value of LIV1 Expression in Early Breast Cancer and by Molecular Subtype

Background: LIV1 is a transmembrane protein that may become a new therapeutic target through the development of antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs). Few studies are available regarding the assessment of LIV1 expression in clinical breast cancer (BC) samples. Methods: We analyzed LIV1 mRNA expression in 8982 primary BC. We searched for correlations between LIV1 expression and clinicopathological data, including disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), pathological complete response to chemotherapy (pCR), and potential vulnerability and actionability to anti-cancer drugs used or under development in BC. Analyses were performed in the whole population and each molecular subtype separately. Results: LIV1 expression was associated with good-prognosis features and with longer DFS and OS in multivariate analysis. However, patients with high LIV1 expression displayed a lower pCR rate than patients with low expression after anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy, including in multivariate analysis adjusted on grade and molecular subtypes. LIV1-high tumors were associated with higher probabilities of sensitivity to hormone therapy and CDK4/6 inhibitors and lower probabilities of sensitivity to immune-checkpoint inhibitors and PARP inhibitors. These observations were different according to the molecular subtypes when analyzed separately. Conclusions: These results may provide novel insights into the clinical development and use of LIV1-targeted ADCs by identifying prognostic and predictive value of LIV1 expression in each molecular subtype and associated vulnerability to other systemic therapies.

Future potential targets of antibody-drug conjugates in breast cancer

Metastatic breast cancer (BC) remains an incurable disease. Besides endocrine and targeted agents, chemotherapy is still a relevant therapeutic option for this disease. Recently, antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have shown to overcome the lack of tumor specificity and systemic toxicity typically associated with traditional chemotherapies, thus improving the therapeutic index. To effectively exploit this technological breakthrough, identification of optimal target antigens (Ags) is of utmost importance. To make the ideal target, differential expression of target Ags between healthy and cancer tissues, as well as specific mechanisms of ADC internalization after Ag-antibody interaction are required. Therefore, several in silico strategies to identify and characterize new promising candidate Ags have been developed. If initial in vitro and in vivo positive data are documented, thus providing a biological rationale for further Ag investigation, early phase clinical trials are designed. In BC, these strategies have already led to the development of effective ADCs, namely trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) and sacituzumab govitecan (SG), primarily targeting HER2 and TROP-2. However, promising new Ags are currently under investigation, with encouraging results especially coming from targeting HER3, FRα, Tissue Factor, LIV-1, ROR1-2, and B7-H4. In this review, we describe the landscape of emergent and future potential targets (i.e., other than HER2 and TROP-2) investigated in BC for ADC development. Predominant target expression, function, preclinical rationale, potential clinical implication, as well as preliminary clinical trial results are provided.

HER2-low expression in breast oncology: treatment implications in the smart chemotherapy era

Human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-low breast cancers, defined as tumors exhibiting a HER2 IHC score of 1+ or 2+ nonamplified, represent an emerging targetable entity in the clinicopathologic landscape of breast cancer. Traditionally considered as not sensitive to HER2-targeting agents, these tumors have shown to be susceptible to a new class of drugs, namely antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). Indeed, the DESTINY-Breast04 phase 3 trial demonstrated the remarkable activity of trastuzumab deruxtecan for treating both hormone-receptor (HR)-positive and triple-negative metastatic breast cancers that show HER2-low expression, reshaping treatment algorithms for these diseases. Concomitantly, the TROPiCS-02 and the ASCENT phase 3 trials have established the role of the anti-Trop-2 ADC sacituzumab govitecan for HR-positive and triple-negative breast cancer, respectively. A careful evaluation of these trials, with their inclusion/exclusion criteria, efficacy and toxicity results, is required in order to understand how best to treat HER2-low metastatic breast cancer in the context of a rapidly evolving therapeutic landscape. The purpose of this narrative review is to recapitulate the available evidence on the use of ADCs in the treatment of HER2-low breast cancer, providing a perspective on their current role in clinical practice.

Molecular and functional imaging in cancer-targeted therapy: current applications and future directions

Targeted anticancer drugs block cancer cell growth by interfering with specific signaling pathways vital to carcinogenesis and tumor growth rather than harming all rapidly dividing cells as in cytotoxic chemotherapy. The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) system has been used to assess tumor response to therapy via changes in the size of target lesions as measured by calipers, conventional anatomically based imaging modalities such as computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and other imaging methods. However, RECIST is sometimes inaccurate in assessing the efficacy of targeted therapy drugs because of the poor correlation between tumor size and treatment-induced tumor necrosis or shrinkage. This approach might also result in delayed identification of response when the therapy does confer a reduction in tumor size. Innovative molecular imaging techniques have rapidly gained importance in the dawning era of targeted therapy as they can visualize, characterize, and quantify biological processes at the cellular, subcellular, or even molecular level rather than at the anatomical level. This review summarizes different targeted cell signaling pathways, various molecular imaging techniques, and developed probes. Moreover, the application of molecular imaging for evaluating treatment response and related clinical outcome is also systematically outlined. In the future, more attention should be paid to promoting the clinical translation of molecular imaging in evaluating the sensitivity to targeted therapy with biocompatible probes. In particular, multimodal imaging technologies incorporating advanced artificial intelligence should be developed to comprehensively and accurately assess cancer-targeted therapy, in addition to RECIST-based methods.

Resistance to Antibody-Drug Conjugates Targeting HER2 in Breast Cancer: Molecular Landscape and Future Challenges

The treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (mBC) with Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) and Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), two antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) targeting HER2, is burdened by progression of disease related to the acquisition of mechanisms of resistance. Resistance to T-DM1 is caused by the decrease of HER2 expression, the alteration of intracellular trafficking, the impairment of lysosome functions, the drug expulsion through efflux pumps and the activation of alternative signal pathways. Instead, the decrease of HER2 expression and SLX4 loss of function mutations represent the first evidences of mechanisms of resistance to T-DXd, according to the results of DAISY trial. Several strategies are under evaluation to overcome resistances to anti-HER2 ADCs and improve clinical outcomes in patients progressing on these agents: combinations with tyrosine kinase inhibitors, statins, immune checkpoint inhibitors and synthetic DNA-damaging agents are emerging as promising approaches. Furthermore, novel anti-HER2 ADCs with innovative structures and mechanisms of action are in development, in the attempt to further improve the activity and tolerability of currently available agents.

Antibody-Drug Conjugates: A New Therapeutic Approach for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive breast cancer subset associated with a worse prognosis and poor response to conventional chemotherapy. Despite recent advances in drug discovery, its management is still a challenge for clinicians, illuminating the unmet need to develop novel treatment approaches. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) are innovative oncology drugs that combine the specificity of monoclonal antibodies and the high efficacy of anticancer payloads, to deliver cytotoxic drugs selectively to cancer cells. Various ADCs were investigated for TNBC and have provided a promise for this aggressive women's cancer including the FDA-approved sacituzumab govitecan. In this chapter, we reviewed different ADCs studied for TNBC including their mechanisms of action, efficacy, and tolerability. Moreover, we have also discussed their therapeutic potential based on combinatorial approaches with other targeted therapies in early and metastatic TNBC.

Innovative Therapeutic Approaches for Patients with HER2-Positive Breast Cancer

Overexpression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), a transmembrane tyrosine kinase receptor, has been described in about 15-20% of breast cancer (BC) and is associated with poor outcomes. Trastuzumab is the first anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody (mAB) that blocks receptor activity but it also activates immune response against cancer cells, thus, revolutionizing the prognosis of patients with HER2-positive BC. Over the years, new therapies have been developed, including other mAbs and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) that required multimodal approaches with chemotherapy to optimize their anticancer activity. This chapter gives a comprehensive overview of the last advancements including new approaches and future combinations, which seem to be very promising in overcoming resistance to the traditional anti-HER2 treatments. A modern therapeutic algorithm should include treatment options based on tumour patterns and a patient-centred approach. A proper patient's selection is crucial to derive maximal benefits from a treatment strategy and emerging biomarkers should be integrated along with the HER2 status, which is currently the only validated biomarker in the context of HER2-positive disease. These biomarkers might include molecular features with reported prognostic/predictive significance, such as phosphatidylinositol 3' -kinase (PI3K) or mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways, programmed cell death protein ligand 1 (PD-L1), and tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), which all affect prognosis and response to treatments.

New Concepts in Cardio-Oncology

Cancer and cardiovascular disease are the two major causes of morbidity and mortality in worldwide. Discovering new therapeutic agents for the management of breast cancer (BC) has increased the numbers of cancer survivors but with the risk of cardiovascular adverse events (CV-AEs). All drugs can potentially damage the cardiovascular system, with different types of clinical manifestations from ischemic myocardial disease to vasculitis, thrombosis or pericarditis. An early detection of CV-AEs guarantees an earlier treatment, which is associated with better outcomes. Cardio-oncology field enlarged its studies to improve prevention, monitoring and treatment of all cardiotoxic manifestations related to old or modern oncological agents. A multidisciplinary approach with a close partnership between oncologists and cardiologists is essential for an optimal management and therapeutic decision-making. The aim of this chapter is to review all types of cardiotoxic manifestations related to novel and old agents approved for treatment of BC patients including chemotherapy, anti-HER2 agents, cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors, PolyADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, antiangiogenic drugs and immunotherapy. We also focused our discussion on prevention, monitoring, treatment, and management of CV-AEs.

Her2low breast cancer. New opportunities and challenges

Background. Breast cancer is an increasingly prevalent cancer pathology. In developed countries, breast cancer hits almost every eighth woman and ranks first in the incidence of patients with malignant tumors. The success of breast cancer therapy is apparently connected with the effectiveness of a strategy of impact on typical breast cancer targets, such as estrogen and progesterone receptors, HER2/neu oncoprotein. Implementation of modern achievements of fundamental science into routine clinical practice will allow the prognosis of patients with breast cancer at both earlier and later stages (in cases of the metastatic lesion) to be improved. Purpose. To review modern literature sources that cover biological and clinical relevance of expanding molecular genetic classification of breast cancer for the purpose of singling out additional clinically significant breast cancer subtypes with special emphasis on HER2-low-positive tumors. Materials and methods. The literature search was performed manually by the keywords (breast cancer, HER2-low-positive breast cancer), and also literature sources from evidential databases PubMed, and Web of Science were reviewed. The data from meta-analyses, randomized trials, systematic reviews, cohort trials, and the data of fundamental works were taken into consideration. 41 literature sources were analyzed in total. We opted for the sources which were published over the last ten years. Results. Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease. Overexpression of the HER2 receptor is peculiar to 15–20% of breast tumors, usually due to amplification of the ERBB2 gene. Taking into account that the ERBB2 gene is a very powerful proto-oncogene, tumors with such phenotype are characterized by aggressive course and unfavorable prognosis. Starting from the 1990s, the development of target drugs aimed at the blockade of HER2 receptors beginning from monoclonal antibodies – trastuzumab, later – pertuzumab, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (lapatinib, neratinib, tucatinib) and the new class of antitumor drugs – conjugates of a monoclonal antibody with a cytostatic drug (trastuzumab emtansine, trastuzumab deruxtecan, trastuzumab duocarmazine) and their implementation into clinical practice changed the course and the prognosis of the patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. In opposition to earlier clinical trials, the results of the more modern ones demonstrate the clinical effectiveness of new antitumor drugs such as conjugates of HER2 monoclonal antibody with a cytostatic drug (trastuzumab deruxtekan, trastuzumab duokarmazine) not only in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer but also in some patients with metastatic breast cancer with low HER2 expression. In order to determine the patients who may potentially benefit from the new target drugs among the patients with HER2-negative breast cancer, a new concept of HER2/neu-low breast cancer has been suggested, which is used for the selection of patients in modern clinical trials, and in the measurable future it will be used in routine clinical practice. Conclusions. Today’s scientific data confirm biological and clinical relevance of expanding molecular genetic classification of breast cancer for the purpose of singling out additional clinically significant breast cancer subtypes with special emphasis on HER2-low-positive tumors. The development of a new class of antitumor drugs, namely conjugates of HER2 monoclonal antibody with a cytostatic drug (trastuzumab deruxtekan, trastuzumab duokarmazine) gives new therapeutic possibilities for patients with breast cancer, and also for patients with other types of malignant tumors.

Association of Endocrine Therapy for HR+/ERBB2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer With Survival Outcomes

IMPORTANCE

Evidence suggests that patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (ERBB2+ [formerly HER2+]) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) have different clinical characteristics and outcomes according to their hormone receptor (HR) status. The place of endocrine therapy (ET) for patients with HR+/ERBB2+ is still not clearly defined in this setting.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association of HR status and first-line inclusion of ET with outcomes among patients with ERBB2+ MBC.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This cohort study was an analysis of clinical data from the French clinical Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME) cohort, including patients with MBC who started treatment between 2008 and 2017. The last date of follow-up was June 18, 2020. Data were analyzed from May 2021 to May 2022.

EXPOSURES

Patients were treated with first-line ERBB2-targeted therapy and either chemotherapy (CT) with or without ET or ET alone. For the study of the association of maintenance ET with outcomes, we included patients treated with first-line ERBB2-targeted therapy with CT and with or without maintenance ET.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Median overall survival (OS) and median first-line progression-free survival (PFS) were reported using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards models and a propensity score were constructed to report and adjust for prognostic factors. Multivariable analysis included age at MBC, time to MBC, number of metastatic sites, type of metastases, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status.

RESULTS

Among 4145 women with ERBB2+ MBC, 2696 patients had HR+ (median [IQR] age, 58.0 [47.0-67.0] years) and 1449 patients had HR- (56.0 [47.0-64.0] years) tumors. The median OS for patients with HR+ vs HR- tumors was 55.9 months (95% CI, 53.7-59.4 months) vs 42.0 months (95% CI, 38.8-45.2 months), confirmed in multivariable analysis (hazard ratio, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.26-1.56; P < .001). The median PFS for patients with HR+ vs HR- tumors was 12.2 months (95% CI, 11.5-12.9 months) vs 9.8 months (95% CI, 9.2-11.0 months; P = .01), and the HR was 1.15 (95% CI, 1.06-1.26; P < .001). In multivariable analysis, no significant difference was found in OS or PFS for 1520 patients treated with ERBB2-targeted therapy with CT and with or without ET vs 203 patients receiving ERBB2-targeted therapy with ET, regardless of type of ERBB2-targeted therapy (trastuzumab or trastuzumab with pertuzumab). This result was confirmed by matching patients using a propensity score. Using the time-dependent ET variable among patients with ERBB2-targeted therapy with CT, those with maintenance ET had significantly better PFS (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.60-0.82; P < .001) and OS (hazard ratio, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.39-0.57; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

These results suggest that ET-containing first-line regimens may be associated with benefits among a subgroup of patients with HR+/ERBB2+ MBC.

The triple negative breast cancer drugs graveyard: a review of failed clinical trials 2017-2022

INTRODUCTION

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for 15-20% of breast cancers (BC) and has the worst prognosis. It is characterized by the absence of both hormone receptor (HR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). TNBC has more limited therapeutic options compared to other subtypes, meaning that there is still a long way to go to discover target treatments.

AREAS COVERED

Our review aims to summarize phase II/III clinical trials enrolling patients with TNBC that have been published between 2017 and 2022 but failed to reach their primary endpoint. We here try to emphasize the limitations and weaknesses noted in negative studies and to point out unexpected results which might be useful to enhance the therapeutic approach to TNBC disease.

EXPERT OPINION

A deeper understanding of the mechanisms behind TNBC heterogeneity allowed to enhance the knowledge of new prognostic and predictive biomarkers of response. However, it is also through several failed clinical trials that we were able to define new therapeutic approaches which improved TNBC patients' clinical outcomes. Nowadays, we still need to overcome several difficulties to fully recognize different intracellular and extracellular pathways that crosstalk in TNBC and the mechanisms of resistance to identify novel tailored-patients' therapies.

A round table discussion: clinical landscape of trastuzumab deruxtecan in breast cancer: a retrospective and prospective view

The treatment landscape of breast cancer has been greatly changed by the innovative targeting therapies. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) with a representative of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) are the most successful ones. The revolutionary next-generation design of ADC transformed to the unprecedented clinical data. The DESTINY-BREAST01 and DESTINY-BREAST03 trials have changed the standard of care for HER2-positve metastatic breast cancer (MBC). At the same time the clinical data of T-DXd in HER2-postive patients with brain metastasis (BM) is numerously gaining and challenging the current treatment concept for central nerve system (CNS) involved disease. The DESTINY-BREAST series trials have quickly expanded to first-line (1L) and early setting of breast cancer. The newly reported positive result of DESTINY-BREAST04 trial has also opening the door of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low era. The breast cancer experts are facing a world of massive data and rapidly changing. Therefore, round table discussion meeting is a great way to share the information and options of among oncologists. This time, the breast cancer experts in China gathered to discuss the important clinical advances of T-DXd and its impact to clinical practice. The meeting minutes were recorded and organized as the review article. This would provide insights to better understanding of the current data and shape the further research directions of breast cancer.

Histology-agnostic approvals for antibody-drug conjugates in solid tumours: is the time ripe?

Several antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have been recently approved to treat solid tumours. Since ADCs seem to have activity in multiple malignancies sharing the expression of a specific antigen, they may be mirroring the experience of histology-agnostic-targeted treatments. So, the possibility to interpret the activity of some ADCs across different cancer types in a biomarker-driven perspective arises. However, relevant biological, methodological, and regulatory challenges should be highlighted and addressed, in order to grant ADCs biomarker-driven regulatory approvals in the next future. In this review, we discuss challenges and opportunities posed by the pan-histological expansion of ADCs in solid tumours. In particular, we provide an overview about technological and manufacturing advancements; we offer up-to-date highlights of the current evidence from clinical trials investigating ADCs in solid tumours; we discuss the need for the identification of optimal predictive biomarkers, as well as major methodological, statistical, and regulatory considerations for a biomarker-driven histology-agnostic approach.

Immunotherapy for HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: Clinical Evidence and Future Perspectives

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among women worldwide, and HER2-positive breast cancer accounts for approximately 15% of all breast cancer diagnoses. The advent of HER2-targeting therapies has dramatically improved the survival of these patients, significantly reducing their risk of recurrence and death. However, as a significant proportion of patients ultimately develop resistance to these therapies, it is extremely important to identify new treatments to further improve their clinical outcomes. Immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment and history of several cancer types, and it has already been approved as a standard of care for patients with triple-negative breast cancer. Based on a strong preclinical rationale, immunotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer represents an intriguing field that is currently under clinical investigation. There is a close interplay between HER2-targeting therapies (both approved and under investigation) and the immune system, and several new immunotherapeutic strategies, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, CAR-T cells and therapeutic vaccines, are being studied in this disease. In this narrative review, we discuss the clinical evidence and the future perspectives of immunotherapy for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer.

Shedding light on triple-negative breast cancer with Trop2-targeted antibody-drug conjugates

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is well-known as the most aggressive subtype of breast cancer. Because TNBC does not express Her2, estrogen receptor, and progesterone receptors, there had been no effective U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved targeted therapy for it until PARP inhibitors and two PD-1/PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies were approved for treatment of TNBC. Most recently, an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), called sacituzumab govitecan (SG), was approved for the treatment of TNBC patients previously received chemotherapy with advanced disease. SG consists of an anti-trophoblast cell-surface antigen 2 (Trop2) antibody conjugated with a topoisomerase I inhibitor, SN-38, which is diffused out of the targeted Trop2 positive cancer cells and induces the bystander killing effect on surrounding cells regardless of their Trop2 expression status. In the Phase III clinical trial, TNBC patients treated with SG showed significantly longer progression-free and overall survival compared to those who were received chemotherapy. In the present review, we summarized the cellular function and signaling of Trop2, the mechanism of action of SG, and the clinical trials of SG that led to its quick approval for TNBC. In addition, we introduced the current ongoing clinical trials of SG as well as another Trop2 ADC, which has potential to overcome some disadvantages of SG.

CAR-T cell therapy for triple-negative breast cancer and other solid tumors: preclinical and clinical progress

INTRODUCTION

Most breast cancer-related deaths arise from triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Molecular heterogeneity, aggressiveness and the lack of effective therapies are major hurdles to therapeutic progress. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells have emerged as a promising immunotherapeutic strategy in TNBC. This approach combines the antigen specificity of an antibody with the effector function of T cells.

AREAS COVERED

This review examines the opportunities provided by CAR-T cell therapies in solid tumors. Emerging targets, ongoing clinical trials, and prospective clinical implications in TNBC are considered later. An emphasis is placed on the key challenges and possible solutions for this therapeutic approach.

EXPERT OPINION

A challenge for CAR-T cell therapy is the selection of the optimal targets to minimize on-target/off-tumor toxicity. Tumor escape via antigen loss and intrinsic heterogeneity is a further hurdle. TROP2, GD2, ROR1, MUC1 and EpCAM are promising targets. Persistence and trafficking to tumor cells may be enhanced by the implementation of CARs with a chemokine receptor and/or constitutively activated interleukin receptors. Fourth-generation CARs (TRUCKs) may redirect T-cells for universal cytokine-mediated killing. Combinatorial approaches and the application of CARs to other immune cells could revert the suppressive immune environment that characterizes solid neoplasms.

Emetogenicity of Antibody-Drug Conjugates (ADCs) in Solid Tumors with a Focus on Trastuzumab Deruxtecan: Insights from an Italian Expert Panel

Simple Summary

Four antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are approved for the treatment of solid tumors, improving the therapeutic index. Despite their high selectivity, nausea and vomiting are the most frequently observed side effects. A deeper understanding of the potential risk for nausea and vomiting is crucial, as they can affect patients’ quality of life and treatment adherence. Prophylaxis with the potential combination of antiemetic therapy with complementary non-pharmacological approaches are even more important, considering that ADC therapies are generally given continuously until disease progression or the occurrence of toxicities.

Abstract

In the past decade, nine antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have been approved for the treatment of various tumors, four of which specifically for solid malignancies. ADCs deliver the cytotoxic payload to the cancer site, thereby improving chemotherapy efficacy while reducing systemic drug exposure and toxicity. With their high selectivity, ADCs are associated with a manageable side-effect profile, with nausea and vomiting being among the most frequent toxicities, although this may vary according to the respective ADC and the associated payload. Information about the emetic risk of the new ADC compounds is limited. Three virtual focus groups of Italian oncologists were held to raise awareness on the importance of an antiemetic prophylaxis regimen to prevent and mitigate ADC-associated emesis and its sequelae. After reviewing published evidence and guidelines, the three expert panels shared their experience on the early use of ADCs gained through the participation in specific clinical trials and their clinical practice. The following issues were discussed: antiemetic therapy during trastuzumab deruxtecan treatment, with a protocol adopted at the San Raffaele Hospital (Milan, Italy); the use of steroids; the management of anticipatory nausea during trastuzumab deruxtecan therapy; nutritional counselling; and effective doctor–patient communication. The experts acknowledged that recommendations should be drug-specific, and formulated opinion-based advice intended to guide physicians in their daily practice until further evidence emerges.

HER2 Low, Ultra-low, and Novel Complementary Biomarkers: Expanding the Spectrum of HER2 Positivity in Breast Cancer

HER2 status in breast cancer is assessed to select patients eligible for targeted therapy with anti-HER2 therapies. According to the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and College of American Pathologists (CAP), the HER2 test positivity is defined by protein overexpression (score 3+) at immunohistochemistry (IHC) and/or gene amplification at in situ hybridization (ISH). The introduction of novel anti-HER2 compounds, however, is changing this paradigm because some breast cancers with lower levels of protein expression (i.e. score 1+/2+ with no gene amplification) benefited from HER2 antibody-drug conjugates (ADC). Recently, a potential for HER2 targeting in HER2 "ultra-low" (i.e. score 0 with incomplete and faint staining in ≤10% of tumor cells) and MutL-deficient estrogen receptor (estrogen receptor)-positive/HER2-negative breast cancers has been highlighted. All these novel findings are transforming the traditional dichotomy of HER2 status and have dramatically raised the expectations in this field. Still, a more aware HER2 status assessment coupled with the comprehensive characterization of the clinical and molecular features of these tumors is required. Here, we seek to provide an overview of the current state of HER2 targeting in breast cancers beyond the canonical HER2 positivity and to discuss the practical implications for pathologists and oncologists.

Therapeutic vaccines for breast cancer: Has the time finally come?

The ability to exploit the immune system as a weapon against cancer has revolutionised the treatment of cancer patients, especially through immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, ICIs demonstrated a modest benefit in treating breast cancer (BC), with the exception of certain subsets of triple-negative BCs. An immune-suppressive tumour microenvironment (TME), typically present in BC, is an important factor in the poor response to immunotherapy.

After almost two decades of poor clinical trial results, cancer vaccines (CVs), an active immunotherapy, have come back in the spotlight because of some technological advancements, ultimately boosted by coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. In particular, neoantigens are emerging as the preferred targets for CVs, with gene-based and viral vector–based platforms in development. Moreover, lipid nanoparticles proved to be immunogenic and efficient delivery vehicles.

Past clinical trials investigating CVs focused especially on the metastatic disease, where the TME is more likely compromised by inhibitory mechanisms. In this sense, favouring the use of CVs as monotherapy in premalignant or in the adjuvant setting and establishing combination treatments (i.e. CV plus ICI) in late-stage disease are promising strategies. This review provides a full overview of the past and current breast cancer vaccine landscape.