Immune Checkpoint Blockade for Metastatic Uveal Melanoma: Patterns of Response and Survival According to the Presence of Hepatic and Extrahepatic Metastasis

Genomic heterogeneity and ploidy identify patients with intrinsic resistance to PD-1 blockade in metastatic melanoma

The introduction of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has markedly improved outcomes for advanced melanoma. However, many patients develop resistance through unknown mechanisms. While combination ICB has improved response rate and progression-free survival, it substantially increases toxicity. Biomarkers to distinguish patients who would benefit from combination therapy versus aPD-1 remain elusive. We analyzed whole-exome sequencing of pretreatment tumors from four cohorts (n = 140) of ICB-naïve patients treated with aPD-1. High genomic heterogeneity and low ploidy robustly identified patients intrinsically resistant to aPD-1. To establish clinically actionable predictions, we optimized and validated a predictive model using ploidy and heterogeneity to confidently identify (90% PPV) patients with intrinsic resistance to and worse survival on aPD-1. We further observed that three of seven (43%) patients predicted to be intrinsically resistant to single-agent PD-1 ICB responded to combination ICB, suggesting that these patients may benefit disproportionately from combination ICB. These findings highlight the importance of heterogeneity and ploidy, nominating an approach toward clinical actionability.

The Current State of Systemic Therapy of Metastatic Uveal Melanoma

Uveal melanoma (UM) is genetically a distinct tumor compared to cutaneous melanoma (CM), and due to its low mutational burden, it is far less perceptible to the immune system. Thus, treatments that have revolutionized the treatment of CM remain widely inefficient in metastatic UM or only demonstrate effectiveness in a small subpopulation of patients. To this end, the therapeutic benefit of immune checkpoint blockade is very limited and may come at the expense of severe immune-related adverse events that could potentially affect all organ systems. Notably, tebentafusp, an entirely novel class of anti-cancer drugs, has received official authorization for the treatment of metastatic UM. It is the first agent that demonstrated a survival advantage in a randomized controlled trial of metastatic UM patients. Despite the survival benefit and approval, the restriction of tebentafusp to HLA-A*02:01-positive patients and the low objective response rate indicate the persistent need for additional therapies. Thus, liver-directed therapies are commonly used for tumor control of hepatic metastases and represent a central pillar of the daily management of liver-dominant disease. Further, promising data from targeted therapies independent of MEK-inhibitors, such as the combination of darovasertib and crizotinib, raise hope for additional options in metastatic UM in the future. This narrative review provides a timely and comprehensive overview of the current treatment landscape for metastatic UM.

Melanoma-specific survival of patients with uveal melanoma and liver metastases diagnosed between 2005 and 2021

Background

Uveal melanoma is the most common malignant tumor of the eye in adults. About half of the patients develop distant metastases, most commonly liver metastases (>90%). These are associated with poorer overall survival compared to patients with extrahepatic metastases.

Patients and methods

In this retrospective study, patients diagnosed with metastatic uveal melanoma between January 2005 and December 2021 and treated at the Center for Dermato-oncology at the University of Tübingen, were included. The total cohort was divided into two groups. Group 1, in which the first diagnosis of metastasis was between 2005 and 2015 and group 2 with first metastasis between 2016 and 2021. Melanoma-specific survival (MSS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method, test for differences was performed by the log-rank test.

Results

A total of 167 patients were included in the study. Since more than 90% of patients had developed liver metastases as their first site of metastasis, we focused our analysis on patients with liver metastases. Median MSS was 28 months (95% confidence interval (CI) (22.8-33.2 months)) in patients receiving first-line liver-directed therapy (n = 89) compared to 10 months (95% CI (8.4-11.6 months)) for patients with first-line systemic therapy (n = 45). The best MSS was found in patients of group 2 and liver-directed therapy as first-line treatment. Since survival with first-line liver-directed therapy was significantly better in group 2, subsequent systemic therapies must also be considered, especially immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Conclusion

This analysis revealed that MSS has improved significantly in recent years. In our analysis, first-line liver-directed therapy was associated with improved survival compared to first-line systemic therapy. Further studies are urgently needed, for example, to investigate the combination of immune checkpoint inhibition or tebentafusp with liver-specific procedures from the outset.

Efficacy and Safety of the Melphalan/Hepatic Delivery System in Patients with Unresectable Metastatic Uveal Melanoma: Results from an Open-Label, Single-Arm, Multicenter Phase 3 Study

BACKGROUND

Uveal melanoma (UM) has a poor prognosis once liver metastases occur. The melphalan/Hepatic Delivery System (melphalan/HDS) is a drug/device combination used for liver-directed treatment of metastatic UM (mUM) patients. The purpose of the FOCUS study was to assess the efficacy and safety of melphalan/HDS in patients with unresectable mUM.

METHODS

Eligible patients with mUM received treatment with melphalan (3.0 mg/kg ideal body weight) once every 6 to 8 weeks for a maximum of six cycles. The primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR). The secondary end points included duration of response (DOR), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

The study enrolled 102 patients with mUM. Treatment was attempted in 95 patients, and 91 patients received treatment. In the treated population (n = 91), the ORR was 36.3 % (95 % confidence interval [CI], 26.44-47.01), including 7.7 % of patients with a complete response. Thus, the study met its primary end point because the lower bound of the 95 % CI for ORR exceeded the upper bound (8.3 %) from the benchmark meta-analysis. The median DOR was 14 months, and the median OS was 20.5 months, with an OS of 80 % at 1 year. The median PFS was 9 months, with a PFS of 65 % at 6 months. The most common serious treatment-emergent adverse events were thrombocytopenia (15.8 %) and neutropenia (10.5 %), treated mostly on an outpatient basis with observation. No treatment-related deaths were observed.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with melphalan/HDS provides a clinically meaningful response rate and demonstrates a favorable benefit-risk profile in patients with unresectable mUM (study funded by Delcath; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02678572; EudraCT no. 2015-000417-44).

Optimizing immune checkpoint blockade in metastatic uveal melanoma: exploring the association of overall survival and the occurrence of adverse events

Introduction

Despite recent advancements in the treatment of metastatic uveal melanoma (UM), the availability of further treatment options remains limited and the prognosis continues to be poor in many cases. In addition to tebentafusp, immune checkpoint blockade (ICB, PD-1 (+/-) CTLA-4 antibodies) is commonly used for metastatic UM, in particular in HLA-A 02:01-negative patients. However, ICB comes at the cost of potentially severe immune-related adverse events (irAE). Thus, the selection of patient groups that are more likely to benefit from ICB is desirable.

Methods

In this analysis, 194 patients with metastatic UM undergoing ICB were included. Patients were recruited from German skin cancer sites and the ADOReg registry. To investigate the association of irAE occurrence with treatment response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) two cohorts were compared: patients without irAE or grade 1/2 irAE (n=137) and patients with grade 3/4 irAE (n=57).

Results

In the entire population, the median OS was 16.4 months, and the median PFS was 2.8 months. Patients with grade 3/4 irAE showed more favorable survival than patients without or grade 1/2 irAE (p=0.0071). IrAE occurred in 44.7% (87/194), and severe irAE in 29.4% (57/194) of patients. Interestingly, irColitis and irHepatitis were significantly associated with longer OS (p=0.0031 and p=0.011, respectively).

Conclusions

This data may indicate an association between irAE and favorable survival outcomes in patients with metastatic UM undergoing ICB treatment and suggests that a reduced tolerance to tumor antigens could be linked to reduced tolerance to self-antigens.

The Future of Checkpoint Inhibitors in Uveal Melanoma: A Narrative Review

INTRODUCTION

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have made tremendous progress over the last decade in the treatment of cutaneous melanoma, but their application in uveal melanoma treatment is less successful, owing in part to the immunological privilege of the eye and the liver, the most frequent site of metastasis. Nevertheless, the therapeutic outcomes reported currently are less pessimistic.

METHODS

In this review, we provide an overview of recent studies of immune checkpoint inhibitors in uveal melanoma and its metastasis and classify studies in this field into three groups: monotherapy of immune checkpoint inhibitors, dual-agent immune checkpoint inhibitors, and immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with other systemic or regional therapies.

RESULTS

Briefly, monotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors performed poorly. Dual-agent immune checkpoint inhibitors had slightly better outcomes than traditional treatments, especially in specific patient populations. As for the combination therapy, the combination with other systemic therapies did not show superiority over dual-agent immune checkpoint inhibitors, but combination with hepatic regional therapies was quite promising. Moreover, research on emerging checkpoints is currently limited to the stage of mechanistic studies.

CONCLUSION

We propose that immune checkpoint inhibitors remain alternative treatments for patients with uveal melanoma, but factors such as cost-effectiveness should also be taken into account. The combination therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors deserves to be further explored.

Size selection of intrahepatic lesions for cryoablation contributes to abscopal effect and long-term survival in patients with liver metastatic melanoma receiving PD-1 blockade therapy

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we aimed to examine parameters of cryoablation, tumor characteristics, and their correlations with distant tumor response and survival of liver metastatic melanoma patients receiving cryoablation and PD-1 blockade (cryo-PD-1) combination treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted among 45 melanoma patients who received combined PD-1 blockade therapy and cryoablation for liver metastasis from 2018 to 2022. Cox regression was utilized to determine the associations between factors and overall survival (OS). Changes in cytokines and immune cell compositions in peripheral blood samples following the combined treatment were investigated, along with their correlations with treatment response.

RESULTS

The mean cycle of cryo-PD-1 combination treatment was 2.2 (range, 1-6), and the 3-month overall response rate (RECIST 1.1 criteria) was 26.7%. Of the 21 patients who failed previous PD-1 blockade therapy after diagnosis of liver metastasis, 4 (19.0%) achieved response within 3 months since combination treatment. The diameter of ablated lesion  ≤ 30 mm, metastatic organs  ≤ 2, and pre-treatment LDH level  ≤ 300 U/L were independent prognostic factors for favorable OS. Further analysis showed patients with intrahepatic tumor size of 15-45 mm, and ablated lesion size of  ≤ 30 mm had significantly higher 3-month response rate (42.9% vs 12.5%; P = 0.022) and survival time (30.5 vs 14.2 months; P = 0.045) than their counterparts. The average increase in NLR among patients with ablated tumor size of  ≤ 3 cm and  > 3 cm were 3.59 ± 5.01 and 7.21 ± 12.57, respectively. The average increase in serum IL-6 levels among patients with ablated tumor size of  ≤ 3 cm and  > 3 cm were 8.62 ± 7.95 pg/ml and 15.40 ± 11.43 pg/ml, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Size selection of intrahepatic lesions for cryoablation is important in order to achieve abscopal effect and long-term survival among patients with liver metastatic melanoma receiving PD-1 blockade therapy.

Combination of radiotherapy and Anlotinib enhances benefit from immunotherapy to liver metastasis and abscopal tumor from lung cancer

Many studies have shown that liver metastasis can weaken the efficacy of immunotherapy. Immunotherapy combined with radiotherapy or anti-angiogenic therapy has been proven to have synergistic anti-tumor effects. So we devote to explore whether the combination of the three therapies can exert effective anti-tumor effects on liver metastasis. The clinical information of 118 patients with liver metastasis were collected to compare the intrahepatic progression-free survival between immunotherapy and immunotherapy combined with other treatments. We used Lewis lung cancer (LLC) cell to establish a mouse liver metastasis tumor model and record tumor burden and survival. Tumor-infiltrating immune cells detected by flow cytometry. RNA sequencing was performed and the proportion of immune cells were analyzed by TIMER2.0 database. Compared with immunotherapy group, the combination therapy group showed a trend for longer median intrahepatic progression-free survival. Radiotherapy combined with PD-1 inhibitor and Anlotinib can inhibit liver metastasis and subcutaneous tumor growth and prolong the survival compared with other groups in vivo. Compared with the anti-PD-1 treatment group, triple therapy can increase CD4+T, CD8+T, and IFN-γ+CD8+T cells and decrease infiltration of polymorphonuclear myeloid-derived suppressor cells (PMN-MDSC) in tumors. PPAR signaling pathway were significantly activated and CD8+T and dendritic cells (DC) were increased in the triple therapy group compared to the PD-1 inhibitor combined with Anlotinib group. Radiotherapy combined with PD-1 inhibitor and Anlotinib can effectively exert anti-tumor efficacy and reshape the tumor immune microenvironment by increasing the infiltration of anti-tumor immune cells and reducing the infiltration of immunosuppressive immune cells.

New immunotherapy approaches as the most effective treatment for uveal melanoma

Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary intraocular malignancy in adults. Conventional methods of UM treatment are based on chemotherapy and radiotherapy, which have been able to control tumor growth in a limited way. But due to the inadequacy and many side effects of these treatments, many UM patients die during treatment, and approximately 50% of patients develop metastasis. Meanwhile, the 2-year survival rate of these patients from the time of metastasis is 8%. Since immunotherapy has the potential to be the most specific and efficient method in the treatment of tumors, it is considered an attractive and promising research field in the treatment of UM. This review highlights recent advances in UM immunotherapy and provides new immunological approaches on how to overcome the challenges of UM immunotherapy.

Identifizierung von Biomarkern und neuen therapeutischen Zielen beim Aderhautmelanom: Identifying biomarkers and novel therapeutic targets in uveal melanoma

Das Uveamelanom (UM) ist eine seltene Krebserkrankung, obwohl es der häufigste Tumor des Auges bei Erwachsenen ist. Die Patienten werden meist in Hautkrebszentren zur Behandlung der metastasierten Erkrankung vorgestellt. Es gibt jedoch erhebliche genetische, biologische und klinische Unterschiede zum kutanen Melanom. Die bei metastasiertem UM am häufigsten eingesetzten Therapien sind Tebentafusp und die kombinierte Immuncheckpoint‐Blockade, die beide niedrige Ansprechraten aufweisen und mit hohen Behandlungskosten und erheblichen immunbedingten Toxizitäten verbunden sein können. Daher ist es von größter Bedeutung, einerseits Biomarker und klinische Profile zu identifizieren, die das Ansprechen auf die Behandlung vorhersagen können und andererseits neue therapeutische Ziele zu finden. Der Einsatz der Immuncheckpoint‐Blockade zeigte in einer Reihe retrospektiver Studien günstigere Ergebnisse bei Patienten mit extrahepatischer Metastasierung und normalen Laktatdehydrogenase‐Werten im Serum, so dass ihr Einsatz in dieser Subgruppe sinnvoller scheint. Um neue Zielmoleküle für Medikamente zu identifizieren, werden wir die Expression und Relevanz von Transkriptionsfaktoren der Neuralleiste in Bioproben von Patienten mit Next‐Generation‐Sequenzierung der dritten Generation analysieren. Computeralgorithmen und netzwerkbasierte Analysen werden die Identifizierung von Zielstrukturen für Medikamente erleichtern, die anschließend in Kurzzeit‐Zellkulturen von Patienten validiert werden. Dieser Ansatz wird dazu beitragen, neue und personalisierte Behandlungen für das UM zu finden.

Liver-directed treatment is associated with improved survival and increased response to immune checkpoint blockade in metastatic uveal melanoma: results from a retrospective multicenter trial

Metastases of uveal melanoma (UM) spread predominantly to the liver. Due to low response rates to systemic therapies, liver-directed therapies (LDT) are commonly used for tumor control. The impact of LDT on the response to systemic treatment is unknown. A total of 182 patients with metastatic UM treated with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) were included in this analysis. Patients were recruited from prospective skin cancer centers and the German national skin cancer registry (ADOReg) of the German Dermatologic Cooperative Oncology Group (DeCOG). Two cohorts were compared: patients with LDT (cohort A, n = 78) versus those without LDT (cohort B, n = 104). Data were analyzed for response to treatment, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). The median OS was significantly longer in cohort A than in cohort B (20.1 vs. 13.8 months; P = 0.0016) and a trend towards improved PFS was observed for cohort A (3.0 vs. 2.5 months; P = 0.054). The objective response rate to any ICB (16.7% vs. 3.8%, P = 0.0073) and combined ICB (14.1% vs. 4.5%, P = 0.017) was more favorable in cohort A. Our data suggest that the combination of LDT with ICB may be associated with a survival benefit and higher treatment response to ICB in patients with metastatic UM.

Immuno-oncology approaches in uveal melanoma: tebentafusp and beyond

Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common ocular malignancy in adults, associated with the poorest prognosis, with metastatic disease occurring in up to 50% of patients. In contrast to metastatic cutaneous melanoma, the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors is associated with poor outcomes in metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM). Tebentafusp, a bispecific molecule, has recently become the first treatment in decades to improve overall survival for mUM. This review summarises the existing and emerging immuno-oncology approaches for the treatment of mUM, and biomarkers of response and resistance to the same. Finally, we propose future research directions that could maximise treatment benefit to a wider pool of patients with UM.

Is tebentafusp superior to combined immune checkpoint blockade and other systemic treatments in metastatic uveal melanoma? A comparative efficacy analysis with population adjustment

BACKGROUND

Distinct systemic treatments exist for metastatic uveal melanoma. Tebentafusp and combined immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) with ipilimumab plus anti-PD-1 antibodies are the most commonly used treatment options but their comparative efficacy is unclear. The aim of this study is to compare currently available systemic treatments regarding overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) with a focus on the comparison of tebentafusp versus combined ICB.

METHODS

The protocol for this study was defined a priori and registered online in the PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews (CRD42022308356, date of registration: 7.2.2022). We performed a systematic literature search in Medline, Embase, and Central to identify eligible studies reporting Kaplan-Meier curves or individual-level survival data showing OS and PFS for metastatic uveal melanoma patients treated with systemic treatments. Kaplan-Meier curves were digitized using the "WebPlotDigitizer" program. Individual-level survival data were subsequently remodelled and pooled for distinct treatment groups. To compare the OS of tebentafusp versus combined ICB, we used matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC), two-stage MAIC (2SMAIC), and simulated treatment comparison (STC) together with digitized individual-level survival data as population-adjusted models.

RESULTS

Overall, 55 independent studies were included of which 2,682 patients were evaluable for OS and 2,258 for PFS. Tebentafusp showed the highest median OS (mOS) of 22.4 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 19.9-29.6) compared to combined ICB (mOS: 15.7 months (95% CI: 14.4-17.9)), anti-PD-(L)1 antibody (mOS: 10.9 months (95% CI: 9.8-13.4)), chemotherapy (mOS: 9.95 months (95% CI: 8.9-11.2)), targeted therapies (mOS: 8.86 months (95% CI: 7.5-10.8)), and anti-CTLA-4 antibody (mOS: 7.8 months (95% CI: 6.8-9.3). The median PFS (mPFS) was similar among the treatment groups ranging from 2.7 months to 3.4 months. For the comparison of tebentafusp versus combined ICB, the hazard ratio (HR) was 0.641 (95% CI: 0.449-0.915) in the unadjusted model, whereas the population-adjusted models showed a HR of 0.386 (95% CI: 0.236-0.631) using MAIC, 0.378 (95% CI: 0.234-0.612) applying 2SMAIC and 0.284 (95% CI: 0.184-0.440) using STC.

CONCLUSIONS

Tebentafusp achieved the best results compared to combined ICB and other systemic treatments, although these results have to be interpreted with caution due to the approximative methodical approach and high heterogeneity of included studies.

Case Report: MSS colorectal extrahepatic (non-liver) metastases as the dominant population for immunotherapy combined with multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Background

The microsatellite stability(MSS) subtype of Colorectal Cancer(CRC) represents approximately 95% of mCRC cases. Immunotherapy was not as encouraging as the data for MSS mCRC cancer. We report the treatment of a series of patients with extrahepatic metastasis of MSS colorectal cancer, which can provide reference and guidance for the treatment of non-hepatic metastasis of MSS colorectal.

Case presentation

This report describes 8 typical cases of successful MSS treatment with lung metastases of CRC. We systematically reviewed the clinical data and detailed medical history of one of these patients with extrahepatic metastasis from MSS colorectal cancer, and reviewed the literature to analyze and discuss the related epidemiological features, mechanisms and recent research findings of the special subgroup of the population.

Conclusions

Although MSS colon rectal cancer is still known as a cold tumor in the industry, immunotherapy combined with multi-targeted anti-vascular tyrosine kinase inhibitors had brought clinical benefits to patients with non-hepatic metastases from MSS colorectal cancer.

BAG2 Is a Novel Prognostic Biomarker and Promising Immunotherapy Target in Uveal Melanoma

BACKGROUND

The importance of BAG2 in malignancy is gradually being recognized, however, information on its role in uveal melanoma (UVM) is limited. We aimed to elucidate its function and potential mechanism of action in UVM.

METHODS

Using the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and GEO-related datasets, we analyzed the differential expression of BAG2 in tumors, combined with clinical information and methylation data to analyze the prognostic value of BAG2, differential methylation and its association with UVM metastasis. In addition, correlation analysis explored the immunological characteristics of BAG2 in UVM and the response to immunotherapy. Finally, a prognostic model of ferroptosis- related genes was constructed and validated.

RESULTS

BAG2 is significantly downregulated in multiple cancers including UVM. Prognostic analysis showed that BAG2 was an independent prognostic factor for UVM. Abnormal methylation of BAG2 may affect the metastasis of UVM and be significantly associated with poor prognosis. Immune analysis clarified that BAG2 was significantly associated with UVM immune cell infiltration and multiple immune checkpoints, and low expression of BAG2 was more beneficial in immunotherapy. In addition, the prognostic model of ferroptosis we constructed has good performance in predicting overall survival and metastasis-free survival of UVM.

CONCLUSIONS

BAG2 is an independent prognostic factor for UVM and may be a potential immune checkpoint for UVM.

Recent Advances and Challenges in Uveal Melanoma Immunotherapy

Simple Summary

Uveal melanoma is the most common primary intraocular malignancy in adults. Although it can be controlled locally, half of the patients still develop metastases. To date, there have been no standard therapeutic strategies for the prevention or treatment of metastases. Existing therapies, such as chemotherapy and targeted therapies, induce only minimal responses. This review focuses on newly published research on immunotherapy. We highlight expanding treatments and their clinical outcomes, as well as propose promising new treatments and feasible checkpoints. Based on these findings, we provide innovative insights into feasible strategies for the treatment of patients with uveal melanoma.

Abstract

Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary intraocular malignancy in adults. Compared to cutaneous melanoma (CM), which mainly harbors BRAF or NRAS mutations, UM predominantly harbors GNAQ or GNA11 mutations. Although primary UM can be controlled locally, approximately 50% of patients still develop metastases. To date, there have been no standard therapeutic strategies for the prevention or treatment of metastases. Unfortunately, chemotherapy and targeted therapies only induce minimal responses in patients with metastatic UM, with a median survival time of only 4–5 months after metastasis detection. Immunotherapy agents, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors, have achieved pioneering outcomes in CM but have shown limited effects in UM. Researchers have explored several feasible checkpoints to identify options for future therapies. Cancer vaccines have shown little in the way of therapeutic benefit in patients with UM, and there are few ongoing trials providing favorable evidence, but adoptive cell transfer-related therapies seem promising and deserve further investigation. More recently, the immune-mobilizing monoclonal T-cell receptor against the cancer molecule tebentafusp showed impressive antitumor effects. Meanwhile, oncolytic viruses and small molecule inhibitors have also gained ground. This review highlights recent progress in burgeoning treatments and provides innovative insights on feasible strategies for the treatment of UM.

Sclerostin Suppression Facilitates Uveal Melanoma Progression Through Activating Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling Via Binding to Membrane Receptors LRP5/LRP6

Objective

Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most frequent primary eye cancer in adults with a 50% mortality rate. Characterizing the fundamental signaling pathways that drive UM is of importance for the development of targeted therapy. This study aims to probe the impact of sclerostin (SOST) on malignant progression of UM and regulation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling.

Methods

Epithelial-type (n=20) and spindle-type (n=16) UM tissues were collected for immunohistochemical staining of SOST, Wnt-1, and β-catenin expressions. SOST was silenced in three UM cell lines (primary spindle-type OCM-1 cells, metastatic epithelial Mum-2B cells, and metastatic spindle-type Mum-2C cells) through transfecting specific siRNA. RT-qPCR and Western blot were presented for examining the levels of SOST, and markers in Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Flow cytometry, MTT, EdU, transwell, and tube formation assays were conducted, respectively. By implanting BALB/c nude murine models in situ, the function of SOST on tumor growth was investigated, followed by immunofluorescence double staining of SOST and LRP5/6.

Results

Low SOST expression as well as high Wnt-1 and β-catenin expressions were found in epithelial-type (high malignancy) than spindle-type (low malignancy) UM tissues. Silencing SOST activated the markers in Wnt/β-catenin signaling as well as accelerated cell cycle progression, migration, invasion, angiogenesis, and reduced apoptosis in UM cells. In situ tumor formation in murine eyes showed that SOST knockdown promoted tumor growth. Moreover, SOST interacted with LRP5/LRP6.

Conclusion

SOST silencing may facilitate the malignant progression of UM cells through activating Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Mechanistically, SOST may exert this function by interacting with LRP5/LRP6 membrane receptors.

A One-Armed Phase I Dose Escalation Trial Design: Personalized Vaccination with IKKβ-Matured, RNA-Loaded Dendritic Cells for Metastatic Uveal Melanoma

Uveal melanoma (UM) is an orphan disease with a mortality of 80% within one year upon the development of metastatic disease. UM does hardly respond to chemotherapy and kinase inhibitors and is largely resistant to checkpoint inhibition. Hence, further therapy approaches are urgently needed. To improve clinical outcome, we designed a trial employing the 3^rd generation personalized IKKβ-matured RNA-transfected dendritic cell (DC) vaccine which primes T cells and in addition activates NK cells. This ongoing phase I trial [NCT04335890 (www.clinicaltrials.gov), Eudract: 2018-004390-28 (www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu)] investigates patients with treatment-naive metastatic UM. Monocytes are isolated by leukapheresis, differentiated to immature DCs, matured with a cytokine cocktail, and activated via the NF-κB pathway by electroporation with RNA encoding a constitutively active mutant of IKKβ. Three types of antigen-RNA are co-electroporated: i) amplified mRNA of the tumor representing the whole transcriptome, ii) RNA encoding driver mutations identified by exome sequencing, and iii) overexpressed non-mutated tumor antigens detected by transcriptome sequencing. This highly personalized DC vaccine is applied by 9 intravenous infusions in a staggered schedule over one year. Parallel to the vaccination, standard therapy, usually an immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) as mono (anti-PD-1) or combined (anti-CTLA4 and anti-PD-1) regimen is initiated. The coordinated vaccine-induced immune response encompassing tumor-specific T cells and innate NK cells should synergize with ICB, perhaps resulting in measurable clinical responses in this resistant tumor entity. Primary outcome measures of this trial are safety, tolerability and toxicity; secondary outcome measures comprise overall survival and induction of antigen-specific T cells.

Immune Checkpoint Blockade for Metastatic Uveal Melanoma: Re-Induction following Resistance or Toxicity

Re-induction with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) needs to be considered in many patients with uveal melanoma (UM) due to limited systemic treatment options. Here, we provide hitherto the first analysis of ICB re-induction in UM. A total of 177 patients with metastatic UM treated with ICB were included from German skin cancer centers and the German national skin cancer registry (ADOReg). To investigate the impact of ICB re-induction, two cohorts were compared: patients who received at least one ICB re-induction (cohort A, n = 52) versus those who received only one treatment line of ICB (cohort B, n = 125). In cohort A, a transient benefit of overall survival (OS) was observed at 6 and 12 months after the treatment start of ICB. There was no significant difference in OS between both groups (p = 0.1) with a median OS of 16.2 months (cohort A, 95% CI: 11.1-23.8) versus 9.4 months (cohort B, 95% CI: 6.1-14.9). Patients receiving re-induction of ICB (cohort A) had similar response rates compared to those receiving ICB once. Re-induction of ICB may yield a clinical benefit for a small subgroup of patients even after resistance or development of toxicities.

Combination of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Liver-Specific Therapies in Liver-Metastatic Uveal Melanoma: Can We Thus Overcome Its High Resistance?

Uveal Melanoma (UM) is a rare disease; however, it is the most common primary intraocular malignant tumor in adults. Hematogenous metastasis, occurring in up to 50% of cases, mainly to the liver (90%), is associated with poor clinical course and treatment failure. In contrast to dramatic benefits of immunotherapy in many tumor entities, as seen in cutaneous melanoma, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) do not achieve comparable results in Metastatic UM (MUM). The aim of this study was to investigate whether the combination of ICI with liver-directed therapies provides a potential survival benefit for those affected. This retrospective, single-center study, including n = 45 patients with MUM, compared the effect of combining ICI with liver-directed therapy ("Cohort 1") with respect to standard therapies ("Cohort 2") on overall survival (OS). Our results revealed a significant survival difference between Cohort 1 (median OS 22.5 months) and Cohort 2 (median OS 11.4 months), indicating that this combination may enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy and thus provide a survival benefit. There is an urgent need for randomized, prospective trials addressing the combination of liver-directed therapies and various strategies of immunotherapy (such as ICI; IMCgp100; personalized vaccines) in order to establish regimens which finally improve the prognosis of patients with MUM.