1
|
Wessely A, Koch EAT, Vera J, Berking C, Heppt MV. Identifying biomarkers and novel therapeutic targets in uveal melanoma. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2024; 22:29-32. [PMID: 37902386 DOI: 10.1111/ddg.15225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2022] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023]
Abstract
Uveal melanoma (UM) is an orphan cancer despite being the most common eye tumor in adults. Patients often present to skin cancer centers for treatment of metastatic disease although there are significant genetic, biological, and clinical differences from cutaneous melanoma. The treatments most commonly used for metastatic UM are tebentafusp and combined immune checkpoint blockade, both of which yield low response rates and may be accompanied by high treatment costs and significant immune-related toxicities. Thus, it is of paramount importance to identify biomarkers and clinical profiles predictive of treatment response and to find novel therapeutic targets. The use of immune checkpoint blockade showed more favorable outcomes in patients with extrahepatic disease and normal levels of serum lactate dehydrogenase in a panel of retrospective studies, making its use more reasonable in this subgroup. To identify novel drug targets, we will analyze the expression and relevance of neural crest transcription factors in patient bio-specimens using next-generation nanopore sequencing. Computer algorithms and network-based analysis will facilitate the identification of druggable targets which will subsequently be validated in patient-derived short-term cell cultures. This approach will help to find novel and personalized treatments for UM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anja Wessely
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nürnberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum für Immuntherapie (DZI), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Elias A T Koch
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nürnberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum für Immuntherapie (DZI), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Julio Vera
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nürnberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum für Immuntherapie (DZI), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Carola Berking
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nürnberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum für Immuntherapie (DZI), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Markus V Heppt
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nürnberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum für Immuntherapie (DZI), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wessely A, Koch EAT, Vera J, Berking C, Heppt MV. Identifizierung von Biomarkern und neuen therapeutischen Zielen beim Aderhautmelanom: Identifying biomarkers and novel therapeutic targets in uveal melanoma. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2024; 22:29-33. [PMID: 38212929 DOI: 10.1111/ddg.15225_g] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2022] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2024]
Abstract
ZusammenfassungDas Uveamelanom (UM) ist eine seltene Krebserkrankung, obwohl es der häufigste Tumor des Auges bei Erwachsenen ist. Die Patienten werden meist in Hautkrebszentren zur Behandlung der metastasierten Erkrankung vorgestellt. Es gibt jedoch erhebliche genetische, biologische und klinische Unterschiede zum kutanen Melanom. Die bei metastasiertem UM am häufigsten eingesetzten Therapien sind Tebentafusp und die kombinierte Immuncheckpoint‐Blockade, die beide niedrige Ansprechraten aufweisen und mit hohen Behandlungskosten und erheblichen immunbedingten Toxizitäten verbunden sein können. Daher ist es von größter Bedeutung, einerseits Biomarker und klinische Profile zu identifizieren, die das Ansprechen auf die Behandlung vorhersagen können und andererseits neue therapeutische Ziele zu finden. Der Einsatz der Immuncheckpoint‐Blockade zeigte in einer Reihe retrospektiver Studien günstigere Ergebnisse bei Patienten mit extrahepatischer Metastasierung und normalen Laktatdehydrogenase‐Werten im Serum, so dass ihr Einsatz in dieser Subgruppe sinnvoller scheint. Um neue Zielmoleküle für Medikamente zu identifizieren, werden wir die Expression und Relevanz von Transkriptionsfaktoren der Neuralleiste in Bioproben von Patienten mit Next‐Generation‐Sequenzierung der dritten Generation analysieren. Computeralgorithmen und netzwerkbasierte Analysen werden die Identifizierung von Zielstrukturen für Medikamente erleichtern, die anschließend in Kurzzeit‐Zellkulturen von Patienten validiert werden. Dieser Ansatz wird dazu beitragen, neue und personalisierte Behandlungen für das UM zu finden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anja Wessely
- Hautklinik, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum für Immuntherapie (DZI), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Elias A T Koch
- Hautklinik, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum für Immuntherapie (DZI), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Julio Vera
- Hautklinik, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum für Immuntherapie (DZI), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Carola Berking
- Hautklinik, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum für Immuntherapie (DZI), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Markus V Heppt
- Hautklinik, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum für Immuntherapie (DZI), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Glaser N, Petzold A, Wessely A, Kaufmann MD, Koch EAT, Knorr H, Voskens C, Heppt MV, Berking C, Erdmann M. Threshold Optimization for Tumor Markers S100b and MIA in Uveal Melanoma - A Single Center Analysis. Anticancer Res 2023; 43:4525-4532. [PMID: 37772590 DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.16646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Revised: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common malignant tumor of the eye in adults. Metastases develop in 50% of the patients, predominantly in the liver. In UM, the cut-off concentrations of the blood-based tumor markers S100b and MIA are inconclusive. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this retrospective monocenter study, we statistically evaluated 1,878 S100b and 1,768 MIA measurements in 244 patients with UM from 2011-2020. Threshold optimization was performed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS A total of 171 patients with non-metastatic UM (nmUM) and 73 patients with metastatic UM (mUM) showed no differences in sex, age at diagnosis or the affected eye. In mUM, 80% of the patients developed metastases to the liver at a median of 46 months after initial diagnosis. The sensitivity and specificity of S100b was 16.10% and 94.52%, and that of MIA was 31.86% and 81.42%, respectively. ROC curves revealed poor values for the area under the curve of 0.57 for S100b and 0.55 for MIA. The optimal cut-off concentration to detect metastases was 0.14 μg/l for S100b and 17.4 ng/ml for MIA. With at least one tumor marker elevated, optimized sensitivity was 20.40% and specificity 96.76%. CONCLUSION Current thresholds for S100b and MIA in UM are not able to detect early metastatic disease and require additional diagnostics to clarify false positive results. Threshold optimization considering both S100b and MIA results in a better diagnostic validity with an acceptable specificity and a poor sensitivity. Highly sensitive blood-based and imaging methods to detect metastases early in UM are urgently needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naemi Glaser
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Anne Petzold
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Anja Wessely
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Matthias D Kaufmann
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen - European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Elias A T Koch
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen - European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Harald Knorr
- Department of Ophthalmology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Caroline Voskens
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen - European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Markus V Heppt
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen - European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Carola Berking
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen - European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Michael Erdmann
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany;
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen - European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Koch EAT, Petzold A, Wessely A, Dippel E, Eckstein M, Gesierich A, Gutzmer R, Hassel JC, Knorr H, Kreuzberg N, Leiter U, Loquai C, Meier F, Meissner M, Mohr P, Pföhler C, Rahimi F, Schadendorf D, Schlaak M, Thoms KM, Ugurel S, Utikal J, Weichenthal M, Schuler-Thurner B, Berking C, Heppt MV. Liver-directed treatment is associated with improved survival and increased response to immune checkpoint blockade in metastatic uveal melanoma: results from a retrospective multicenter trial. Front Med 2023; 17:878-888. [PMID: 37432641 DOI: 10.1007/s11684-023-0993-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/12/2023]
Abstract
Metastases of uveal melanoma (UM) spread predominantly to the liver. Due to low response rates to systemic therapies, liver-directed therapies (LDT) are commonly used for tumor control. The impact of LDT on the response to systemic treatment is unknown. A total of 182 patients with metastatic UM treated with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) were included in this analysis. Patients were recruited from prospective skin cancer centers and the German national skin cancer registry (ADOReg) of the German Dermatologic Cooperative Oncology Group (DeCOG). Two cohorts were compared: patients with LDT (cohort A, n = 78) versus those without LDT (cohort B, n = 104). Data were analyzed for response to treatment, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). The median OS was significantly longer in cohort A than in cohort B (20.1 vs. 13.8 months; P = 0.0016) and a trend towards improved PFS was observed for cohort A (3.0 vs. 2.5 months; P = 0.054). The objective response rate to any ICB (16.7% vs. 3.8%, P = 0.0073) and combined ICB (14.1% vs. 4.5%, P = 0.017) was more favorable in cohort A. Our data suggest that the combination of LDT with ICB may be associated with a survival benefit and higher treatment response to ICB in patients with metastatic UM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elias A T Koch
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nürnberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Östliche Stadtmauerstraße 30, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Anne Petzold
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nürnberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Östliche Stadtmauerstraße 30, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Anja Wessely
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nürnberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Östliche Stadtmauerstraße 30, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Edgar Dippel
- Department of Dermatology, Ludwigshafen Medical Center, 67059, Ludwigshafen, Germany
| | - Markus Eckstein
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nürnberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Östliche Stadtmauerstraße 30, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Anja Gesierich
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Würzburg, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Ralf Gutzmer
- Skin Cancer Center Minden, Department of Dermatology, Mühlenkreiskliniken AöR, Ruhr University, Bochum Campus Minden, 32423, Minden, Germany
| | - Jessica C Hassel
- Skin Cancer Center, Department of Dermatology and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Harald Knorr
- Department of Ophthalmology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Nicole Kreuzberg
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Skin Cancer Center at the Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO) Köln Bonn, University Hospital of Cologne, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ulrike Leiter
- Department of Dermatology, Center for Dermatooncology, University Hospital Tübingen, 72056, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Carmen Loquai
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Mainz, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Friedegund Meier
- Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Center Dresden and National Center for Tumor Diseases & Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | - Markus Meissner
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Goethe University, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Peter Mohr
- Department of Dermatology, Elbeklinikum, 21614, Buxtehude, Germany
| | - Claudia Pföhler
- Department of Dermatology, Saarland University Medical School, 66421, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Farnaz Rahimi
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Munich University Hospital (LMU), 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Dirk Schadendorf
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site, Essen/Düsseldorf, Germany, 45147
| | - Max Schlaak
- Department of Dermatology, Venerology and Allergology, Charité -Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Kai-Martin Thoms
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Goettingen, 37075, Goettingen, Germany
| | - Selma Ugurel
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site, Essen/Düsseldorf, Germany, 45147
| | - Jochen Utikal
- Skin Cancer Unit, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karl University of Heidelberg, and DKFZ Hector Cancer Institute at the University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Michael Weichenthal
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, 24105, Kiel, Germany
| | - Beatrice Schuler-Thurner
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nürnberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Östliche Stadtmauerstraße 30, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Carola Berking
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nürnberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Östliche Stadtmauerstraße 30, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Markus V Heppt
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nürnberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
- Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Östliche Stadtmauerstraße 30, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Koch EAT, Berking C, Erber R, Erdmann M, Kiesewetter F, Schliep S, Heppt MV. Standardized Computer-Assisted Analysis of 5-hmC Immunoreactivity in Dysplastic Nevi and Superficial Spreading Melanomas. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:14711. [PMID: 37834158 PMCID: PMC10572721 DOI: 10.3390/ijms241914711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Revised: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023] Open
Abstract
5-Hydroxymethylcytosine (5-hmC) is an important intermediate of DNA demethylation. Hypomethylation of DNA is frequent in cancer, resulting in deregulation of 5-hmC levels in melanoma. However, the interpretation of the intensity and distribution of 5-hmC immunoreactivity is not very standardized, which makes its interpretation difficult. In this study, 5-hmC-stained histological slides of superficial spreading melanomas (SSM) and dysplastic compound nevi (DN) were digitized and analyzed using the digital pathology and image platform QuPath. Receiver operating characteristic/area under the curve (ROCAUC) and t-tests were performed. A p-value of <0.05 was used for statistical significance, and a ROCAUC score of >0.8 was considered a "good" result. In total, 92 5-hmC-stained specimens were analyzed, including 42 SSM (45.7%) and 50 DN (54.3%). The mean of 5-hmC-positive cells/mm2 for the epidermis and dermo-epidermal junction and the entire lesion differed significantly between DN and SSM (p = 0.002 and p = 0.006, respectively) and showed a trend towards higher immunoreactivity in the dermal component (p = 0.069). The ROCAUC of 5-hmC-positive cells of the epidermis and dermo-epidermal junction was 0.79, for the dermis 0.74, and for the entire lesion 0.76. These results show that the assessment of the epidermal with junctional expression of 5-hmC is slightly superior to dermal immunoreactivity in distinguishing between DN and SSM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elias A. T. Koch
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (C.B.); (M.E.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen—European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany;
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Carola Berking
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (C.B.); (M.E.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen—European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany;
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Ramona Erber
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen—European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany;
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Michael Erdmann
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (C.B.); (M.E.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen—European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany;
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Stefan Schliep
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (C.B.); (M.E.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen—European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany;
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Markus V. Heppt
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (C.B.); (M.E.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen—European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany;
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Koch EAT, Steeb T, Bender-Säbelkampf S, Busch D, Feustel J, Kaufmann MD, Maronna A, Meder C, Ronicke M, Toussaint F, Wellein H, Berking C, Heppt MV. Poor Adherence to Self-Applied Topical Drug Treatment Is a Common Source of Low Lesion Clearance in Patients with Actinic Keratosis-A Cross-Sectional Study. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12113813. [PMID: 37298008 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12113813] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Revised: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 05/29/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many treatments for actinic keratosis (AK) have been proven efficient in clinical trials. However, patients with AK may still experience unsatisfactory therapeutic outcomes in clinical practice. OBJECTIVES To investigate patient adherence to self-applied topical interventions for AK and to explore factors associated with adherence in a real-world setting. METHODS A cross-sectional study was conducted. Patients presenting with AK were asked to complete a self-administered questionnaire about their last topical AK treatment. RESULTS A total of 113 patients participated with a median age of 78.5 years (range 58-94). Fifty-four patients (47.8%) received topical diclofenac, ten (8.8%) imiquimod, nine (8%) 5-fluorouracil, nine (8%) 5-fluorouracil plus salicylic acid, and eight (7.1%) photodynamic therapy. The non-adherence rate was 46.9% (n = 53), and only 30.9% (n = 35) used the topical treatments according to the summary of product characteristics (SmPC). These subgroups were compared. Patients of the non-compliant group were significantly less informed about the application time of the specific topical intervention (p = 0.002) and adjusted the timeframe (p < 0.001) and application frequency of the therapy (p = 0.02) independently of their physician. Conversely, patients reporting a sufficient pre-treatment consultation (p = 0.019) generally complied with the SmPC compliance application. CONCLUSIONS A thorough pre-treatment consultation can help to increase treatment adherence and ensure lesion clearance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elias A T Koch
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nürnberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Theresa Steeb
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nürnberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sophia Bender-Säbelkampf
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nürnberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Dorothee Busch
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nürnberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Janina Feustel
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nürnberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Matthias D Kaufmann
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nürnberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Andreas Maronna
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nürnberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Christine Meder
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nürnberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Moritz Ronicke
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nürnberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Frédéric Toussaint
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nürnberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Hedwig Wellein
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nürnberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Carola Berking
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nürnberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Markus V Heppt
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nürnberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Koch EAT, Erdmann M, Berking C, Kiesewetter F, Kramer R, Schliep S, Heppt MV. Standardized Computer-Assisted Analysis of PRAME Immunoreactivity in Dysplastic Nevi and Superficial Spreading Melanomas. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:ijms24076388. [PMID: 37047361 PMCID: PMC10094429 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24076388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2023] [Revised: 03/21/2023] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023] Open
Abstract
PRAME (PReferentially expressed Antigen in MElanoma) is a cancer testis antigen that is frequently expressed in melanoma compared to benign melanocytic proliferations and nevi. However, the interpretation of the intensity and distribution of PRAME immunostaining is not standardized a lot, which makes interpretation difficult. PRAME-stained histological slides of superficial spreading melanomas (SSM) and dysplastic nevi (DN) were digitized and analyzed using the digital pathology and image platform QuPath. t-tests and ROC AUCs were performed with SPSS. A p-value of <0.05 was used for statistical significance, and a ROC AUC score of >0.8 was considered a good result. A cut-off score was defined in an evaluation cohort and subsequently analyzed in an independent validation cohort. In total, 81 PRAME-stained specimens were included. The evaluation cohort included 32 (50%) SSM and 32 (50%) DN, and the mean of PRAME-positive cells/mm2 for the entire lesion was 455.3 (SD 428.2) in SSM and 60.5 (SD 130.1; p < 0.001) in DN. The ROC AUC of PRAME-positive cells of the entire lesion was 0.866, and in the epidermis it was 0.901. The defined cut-off score to distinguish between DN and SSM was 97.67 cells/mm2. In the validation cohort, 16 out of 17 cases (94.1%) were correctly classified by the cut-off score. The computer-aided assessment of PRAME immunostaining is a useful tool in dermatopathology to distinguish between DN and SSM. Lesions with a moderate expression and indifferent morphologic features will remain a challenge for dermatopathologists.
Collapse
|
8
|
Petzold A, Steeb T, Wessely A, Koch EAT, Vera J, Berking C, Heppt MV. Is tebentafusp superior to combined immune checkpoint blockade and other systemic treatments in metastatic uveal melanoma? A comparative efficacy analysis with population adjustment. Cancer Treat Rev 2023; 115:102543. [PMID: 36931146 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2023.102543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Revised: 03/09/2023] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 03/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Distinct systemic treatments exist for metastatic uveal melanoma. Tebentafusp and combined immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) with ipilimumab plus anti-PD-1 antibodies are the most commonly used treatment options but their comparative efficacy is unclear. The aim of this study is to compare currently available systemic treatments regarding overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) with a focus on the comparison of tebentafusp versus combined ICB. METHODS The protocol for this study was defined a priori and registered online in the PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews (CRD42022308356, date of registration: 7.2.2022). We performed a systematic literature search in Medline, Embase, and Central to identify eligible studies reporting Kaplan-Meier curves or individual-level survival data showing OS and PFS for metastatic uveal melanoma patients treated with systemic treatments. Kaplan-Meier curves were digitized using the "WebPlotDigitizer" program. Individual-level survival data were subsequently remodelled and pooled for distinct treatment groups. To compare the OS of tebentafusp versus combined ICB, we used matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC), two-stage MAIC (2SMAIC), and simulated treatment comparison (STC) together with digitized individual-level survival data as population-adjusted models. RESULTS Overall, 55 independent studies were included of which 2,682 patients were evaluable for OS and 2,258 for PFS. Tebentafusp showed the highest median OS (mOS) of 22.4 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 19.9-29.6) compared to combined ICB (mOS: 15.7 months (95% CI: 14.4-17.9)), anti-PD-(L)1 antibody (mOS: 10.9 months (95% CI: 9.8-13.4)), chemotherapy (mOS: 9.95 months (95% CI: 8.9-11.2)), targeted therapies (mOS: 8.86 months (95% CI: 7.5-10.8)), and anti-CTLA-4 antibody (mOS: 7.8 months (95% CI: 6.8-9.3). The median PFS (mPFS) was similar among the treatment groups ranging from 2.7 months to 3.4 months. For the comparison of tebentafusp versus combined ICB, the hazard ratio (HR) was 0.641 (95% CI: 0.449-0.915) in the unadjusted model, whereas the population-adjusted models showed a HR of 0.386 (95% CI: 0.236-0.631) using MAIC, 0.378 (95% CI: 0.234-0.612) applying 2SMAIC and 0.284 (95% CI: 0.184-0.440) using STC. CONCLUSIONS Tebentafusp achieved the best results compared to combined ICB and other systemic treatments, although these results have to be interpreted with caution due to the approximative methodical approach and high heterogeneity of included studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Petzold
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany; Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Theresa Steeb
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany; Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Anja Wessely
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany; Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Elias A T Koch
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany; Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Julio Vera
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany; Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Carola Berking
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany; Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Markus V Heppt
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany; Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Müller K, Berking C, Voskens C, Heppt MV, Heinzerling L, Koch EAT, Kramer R, Merkel S, Schuler-Thurner B, Schellerer V, Steeb T, Wessely A, Erdmann M. Conventional and three-dimensional photography as a tool to map distribution patterns of in-transit melanoma metastases on the lower extremity. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023; 10:1089013. [PMID: 36744147 PMCID: PMC9892836 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1089013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Accepted: 01/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Background In melanoma, in-transit metastases characteristically occur at the lower extremity along lymphatic vessels. Objectives The objective of this study was to evaluate conventional or three-dimensional photography as a tool to analyze in-transit metastasis pattern of melanoma of the lower extremity. In addition, we assessed risk factors for the development of in-transit metastases in cutaneous melanoma. Methods In this retrospective, monocentric study first we compared the clinical data of all evaluable patients with in-transit metastases of melanoma on the lower extremity (n = 94) with melanoma patients without recurrence of disease (n = 288). In addition, based on conventional (n = 24) and three-dimensional photography (n = 22), we defined the specific distribution patterns of the in-transit metastases on the lower extremity. Results Using a multivariate analysis we identified nodular melanoma, tumor thickness, and ulceration as independent risk factors to develop in-transit metastases ITM (n = 94). In patients with melanoma on the lower leg (n = 31), in-transit metastases preferentially developed along anatomically predefined lymphatic pathways. In contrast when analyzing in-transit metastases of melanoma on the foot (n = 15) no clear pattern could be visualized. In addition, no difference in distance between in-transit metastases and primary melanoma on the foot compared to the lower leg was observed using three-dimensional photography (n = 22). Conclusion A risk-adapted follow-up of melanoma patients to detect in-transit metastases can be applied by knowledge of the specific lymphatic drainage of the lower extremity. Our current analysis suggests a more complex lymphatic drainage of the foot.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kilian Müller
- Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Carola Berking
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany,Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen–European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Caroline Voskens
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany,Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen–European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Markus V. Heppt
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany,Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen–European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Lucie Heinzerling
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Elias A. T. Koch
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany,Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen–European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Rafaela Kramer
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany,Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen–European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Susanne Merkel
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen–European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany,Department of Surgery, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Beatrice Schuler-Thurner
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany,Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen–European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Vera Schellerer
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Theresa Steeb
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany,Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen–European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Anja Wessely
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany,Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen–European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Michael Erdmann
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany,Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen–European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany,*Correspondence: Michael Erdmann,
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Koch EAT, Schaft N, Kummer M, Berking C, Schuler G, Hasumi K, Dörrie J, Schuler-Thurner B. A One-Armed Phase I Dose Escalation Trial Design: Personalized Vaccination with IKKβ-Matured, RNA-Loaded Dendritic Cells for Metastatic Uveal Melanoma. Front Immunol 2022; 13:785231. [PMID: 35185883 PMCID: PMC8854646 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.785231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2021] [Accepted: 01/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Uveal melanoma (UM) is an orphan disease with a mortality of 80% within one year upon the development of metastatic disease. UM does hardly respond to chemotherapy and kinase inhibitors and is largely resistant to checkpoint inhibition. Hence, further therapy approaches are urgently needed. To improve clinical outcome, we designed a trial employing the 3rd generation personalized IKKβ-matured RNA-transfected dendritic cell (DC) vaccine which primes T cells and in addition activates NK cells. This ongoing phase I trial [NCT04335890 (www.clinicaltrials.gov), Eudract: 2018-004390-28 (www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu)] investigates patients with treatment-naive metastatic UM. Monocytes are isolated by leukapheresis, differentiated to immature DCs, matured with a cytokine cocktail, and activated via the NF-κB pathway by electroporation with RNA encoding a constitutively active mutant of IKKβ. Three types of antigen-RNA are co-electroporated: i) amplified mRNA of the tumor representing the whole transcriptome, ii) RNA encoding driver mutations identified by exome sequencing, and iii) overexpressed non-mutated tumor antigens detected by transcriptome sequencing. This highly personalized DC vaccine is applied by 9 intravenous infusions in a staggered schedule over one year. Parallel to the vaccination, standard therapy, usually an immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) as mono (anti-PD-1) or combined (anti-CTLA4 and anti-PD-1) regimen is initiated. The coordinated vaccine-induced immune response encompassing tumor-specific T cells and innate NK cells should synergize with ICB, perhaps resulting in measurable clinical responses in this resistant tumor entity. Primary outcome measures of this trial are safety, tolerability and toxicity; secondary outcome measures comprise overall survival and induction of antigen-specific T cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elias A. T. Koch
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Region of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Niels Schaft
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Region of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Erlangen, Germany
- *Correspondence: Niels Schaft,
| | - Mirko Kummer
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Region of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Carola Berking
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Region of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Gerold Schuler
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Region of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Jan Dörrie
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Region of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Beatrice Schuler-Thurner
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Region of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Koch EAT, Petzold A, Wessely A, Dippel E, Erdmann M, Heinzerling L, Hohberger B, Knorr H, Leiter U, Meier F, Mohr P, Rahimi F, Schell B, Schlaak M, Terheyden P, Schuler-Thurner B, Ugurel S, Utikal J, Vera J, Weichenthal M, Ziller F, Berking C, Heppt MV. Clinical determinants of long-term survival in metastatic uveal melanoma. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2021; 71:1467-1477. [PMID: 34709438 PMCID: PMC9123041 DOI: 10.1007/s00262-021-03090-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2021] [Accepted: 10/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
This study aimed to identify prognostic factors in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma (UM) that were associated with long-term survival in a real-world setting. A total of 94 patients with metastatic UM were included from German skin cancer centers and the German national skin cancer registry (ADOReg). Data were analyzed for the response to treatment, progression-free survival, and overall survival (OS). Prognostic factors were explored with univariate Cox regression, log-rank, and χ2-tests. Identified factors were subsequently validated after the population was divided into two cohorts of short-term survival (< 2 years OS, cohort A, n = 50) and long-term survival (> 2 years OS, cohort B, n = 44). A poor ECOG performance status (hazard ratio [HR] 2.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0–3.9) and elevated serum LDH (HR 2.0, 95% CI 1.0–3.8) were associated with a poor OS, whereas a good response to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB, p < 0.001), radiation therapy (p < 0.001), or liver-directed treatments (p = 0.01) were associated with a prolonged OS. Long-term survivors (cohort B) showed a higher median number of organs affected by metastasis (p < 0.001), while patients with liver metastases only were more common in cohort A (40% vs. 9%; p = 0.002). A partial response to ICB was observed in 16% (12/73), being 21% (8/38) for combined ICB, 17% (1/6) for single CTLA4 inhibition, and 10% (3/29) for single PD1 inhibition. One complete response occurred in cohort B with combined ICB. We conclude that the response to ICB and the presence of extrahepatic disease were favorable prognostic factors for long-term survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elias A T Koch
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.,Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Anne Petzold
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.,Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Anja Wessely
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.,Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Edgar Dippel
- Department of Dermatology, Ludwigshafen Medical Center, Ludwigshafen, Germany
| | - Michael Erdmann
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.,Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Lucie Heinzerling
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.,Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Munich University Hospital (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Bettina Hohberger
- Department of Ophthalmology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Harald Knorr
- Department of Ophthalmology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Ulrike Leiter
- Department of Dermatology, Center for Dermatooncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Friedegund Meier
- Department of Dermatology, Skin Cancer Center, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Peter Mohr
- Department of Dermatology, Elbe Klinikum Buxtehude, Buxtehude, Germany
| | - Farnaz Rahimi
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Munich University Hospital (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Beatrice Schell
- Department of Dermatology, SRH Wald-Klinikum Gera, Gera, Germany
| | - Max Schlaak
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Munich University Hospital (LMU), Munich, Germany.,Department of Dermatology, Venerology and Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität, Berlin, Germany
| | - Patrick Terheyden
- Department of Dermatology, Allergology and Venereology, University Medical Center of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Beatrice Schuler-Thurner
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.,Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Selma Ugurel
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Duisurg, Germany
| | - Jochen Utikal
- Skin Cancer Unit, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karl University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Julio Vera
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.,Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Michael Weichenthal
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Fabian Ziller
- Department of Dermatology, DRK Krankenhaus Rabenstein, Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Carola Berking
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.,Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Markus V Heppt
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany. .,Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Koch EAT, Petzold A, Wessely A, Dippel E, Gesierich A, Gutzmer R, Hassel JC, Haferkamp S, Hohberger B, Kähler KC, Knorr H, Kreuzberg N, Leiter U, Loquai C, Meier F, Meissner M, Mohr P, Pföhler C, Rahimi F, Schadendorf D, Schell B, Schlaak M, Terheyden P, Thoms KM, Schuler-Thurner B, Ugurel S, Ulrich J, Utikal J, Weichenthal M, Ziller F, Berking C, Heppt MV. Immune Checkpoint Blockade for Metastatic Uveal Melanoma: Patterns of Response and Survival According to the Presence of Hepatic and Extrahepatic Metastasis. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13133359. [PMID: 34283061 PMCID: PMC8268645 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13133359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2021] [Revised: 06/27/2021] [Accepted: 06/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since there is no standardized and effective treatment for advanced uveal melanoma (UM), the prognosis is dismal once metastases develop. Due to the availability of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) in the real-world setting, the prognosis of metastatic UM has improved. However, it is unclear how the presence of hepatic and extrahepatic metastasis impacts the response and survival after ICB. METHODS A total of 178 patients with metastatic UM treated with ICB were included in this analysis. Patients were recruited from German skin cancer centers and the German national skin cancer registry (ADOReg). To investigate the impact of hepatic metastasis, two cohorts were compared: patients with liver metastasis only (cohort A, n = 55) versus those with both liver and extra-hepatic metastasis (cohort B, n = 123). Data were analyzed in both cohorts for response to treatment, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). The survival and progression probabilities were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank tests, χ2 tests, and t-tests were performed to detect significant differences between both cohorts. RESULTS The median OS of the overall population was 16 months (95% CI 13.4-23.7) and the median PFS, 2.8 months (95% CI 2.5-3.0). The median OS was longer in cohort B than in cohort A (18.2 vs. 6.1 months; p = 0.071). The best objective response rate to dual ICB was 13.8% and to anti-PD-1 monotherapy 8.9% in the entire population. Patients with liver metastases only had a lower response to dual ICB, yet without significance (cohort A 8.7% vs. cohort B 16.7%; p = 0.45). Adverse events (AE) occurred in 41.6%. Severe AE were observed in 26.3% and evenly distributed between both cohorts. CONCLUSION The survival of this large cohort of patients with advanced UM was more favorable than reported in previous benchmark studies. Patients with both hepatic and extrahepatic metastasis showed more favorable survival and higher response to dual ICB than those with hepatic metastasis only.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elias A. T. Koch
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (E.A.T.K.); (A.P.); (A.W.); (B.S.-T.); (C.B.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Anne Petzold
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (E.A.T.K.); (A.P.); (A.W.); (B.S.-T.); (C.B.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Anja Wessely
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (E.A.T.K.); (A.P.); (A.W.); (B.S.-T.); (C.B.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Edgar Dippel
- Department of Dermatology, Ludwigshafen Medical Center, 67059 Ludwigshafen, Germany;
| | - Anja Gesierich
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany;
| | - Ralf Gutzmer
- Skin Cancer Center Minden, Department of Dermatology, Mühlenkreiskliniken AöR, Ruhr University Bochum Campus Minden, 32423 Minden, Germany;
| | - Jessica C. Hassel
- Skin Cancer Center, Department of Dermatology and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany;
| | - Sebastian Haferkamp
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany;
| | - Bettina Hohberger
- Department of Ophthalmology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (B.H.); (H.K.)
| | - Katharina C. Kähler
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany; (K.C.K.); (M.W.)
| | - Harald Knorr
- Department of Ophthalmology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (B.H.); (H.K.)
| | - Nicole Kreuzberg
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Skin Cancer Center at the Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO) Köln Bonn, University Hospital of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany;
| | - Ulrike Leiter
- Department of Dermatology, Center for Dermatooncology, University Hospital Tübingen, 72056 Tübingen, Germany;
| | - Carmen Loquai
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany;
| | - Friedegund Meier
- Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Centre Dresden and National Center for Tumor Diseases & Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, 01307 Dresden, Germany;
| | - Markus Meissner
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Goethe University, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany;
| | - Peter Mohr
- Department of Dermatology, Elbeklinikum, 21614 Buxtehude, Germany;
| | - Claudia Pföhler
- Department of Dermatology, Saarland University Medical School, 66421 Homburg/Saar, Germany;
| | - Farnaz Rahimi
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Munich University Hospital (LMU), 81377 Munich, Germany;
| | - Dirk Schadendorf
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (D.S.); (S.U.)
- German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Beatrice Schell
- Department of Dermatology, SRH Wald-Klinikum Gera, 07548 Gera, Germany;
| | - Max Schlaak
- Department of Dermatology, Venerology and Allergology, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Patrick Terheyden
- Department of Dermatology, University of Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany;
| | - Kai-Martin Thoms
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Goettingen, 37075 Goettingen, Germany;
| | - Beatrice Schuler-Thurner
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (E.A.T.K.); (A.P.); (A.W.); (B.S.-T.); (C.B.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Selma Ugurel
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (D.S.); (S.U.)
| | - Jens Ulrich
- Department of Dermatology, Harzklinikum Dorothea Christiane Erxleben, 06484 Quedlinburg, Germany;
| | - Jochen Utikal
- Skin Cancer Unit, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 68167 Heidelberg, Germany;
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karl University of Heidelberg, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Michael Weichenthal
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany; (K.C.K.); (M.W.)
| | - Fabian Ziller
- Department of Dermatology, DRK Krankenhaus Rabenstein, 09117 Chemnitz, Germany;
| | - Carola Berking
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (E.A.T.K.); (A.P.); (A.W.); (B.S.-T.); (C.B.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Markus V. Heppt
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (E.A.T.K.); (A.P.); (A.W.); (B.S.-T.); (C.B.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-9131-85-35747
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
Introduction: Actinic keratosis (AK) are proliferations of atypical keratinocytes that may eventually progress to cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Therefore, AK requires consequent and early treatment. Areas covered: A variety of effective approaches is currently available for the clearance of AK. These interventions may be applied either in a lesion-directed or field-directed mode as AK can occur as single or multiple lesions. Field-directed approaches typically comprise topical drug-mediated interventions which aim at eliminating all visible lesions and also at clearing subclinical changes of the actinically damaged field. However, most treatment options are associated with local adverse events such as erythema, scaling, pain, and rarely with systemic symptoms. This expert review provides a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of the safety considerations of the commonly prescribed topical treatment agents cyclooxygenase inhibitors, 5-fluorouracil, imiquimod, ingenol mebutate, and photodynamic therapy. All these therapies have been proven efficient, yet they differ considerably regarding their safety profile. Expert opinion: In the future, safety concerns will relate to long-term and irreversible adverse drug events instead of application site reactions. In particular, the rate of treatment-associated non-melanoma skin cancers will increasingly come into focus and warrant investigation in postmarketing surveillance trials with a long-term follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elias A T Koch
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.,Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Anja Wessely
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.,Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Theresa Steeb
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.,Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Carola Berking
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.,Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Markus V Heppt
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.,Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Wessely A, Steeb T, Heppt F, Hornung A, Kaufmann MD, Koch EAT, Toussaint F, Erdmann M, Berking C, Heppt MV. A Critical Appraisal of Evidence- and Consensus-Based Guidelines for Actinic Keratosis. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 28:950-960. [PMID: 33617511 PMCID: PMC7985770 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol28010093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2021] [Revised: 02/10/2021] [Accepted: 02/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Actinic keratoses (AK) are common lesions of the skin that can be effectively treated with several lesion- and field-directed treatments. Clinical practice guidelines assist physicians in choosing the appropriate treatment options for their patients. Here, we aimed to systematically identify and evaluate the methodological quality of currently available guidelines for AK. Guidelines published within the last 5 years were identified in a systematic search of guideline databases, Medline and Embase. Then, six independent reviewers evaluated the methodological quality using the tools "Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation" (AGREE II) and "Recommendation EXcellence" (AGREE-REX). The Kruskal-Wallis (H) test was used to explore differences among subgroups and Spearman's correlation to examine the relationship between individual domains. Three guidelines developed by consortia from Canada, Germany and the United Kingdom were eligible for the evaluation. The German guideline achieved the highest scores, fulfilling 65 to 92% of the criteria in AGREE II and 67 to 84% in AGREE-REX, whereas the Canadian guideline scored 31 to 71% of the criteria in AGREE II and 33 to 46% in AGREE-REX. The domains "stakeholder involvement" and "values and preferences" were identified as methodological weaknesses requiring particular attention and improvement in future guideline efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anja Wessely
- Department of Dermatology, Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (A.W.); (T.S.); (F.H.); (A.H.); (M.D.K.); (E.A.T.K.); (F.T.); (M.E.); (C.B.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Theresa Steeb
- Department of Dermatology, Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (A.W.); (T.S.); (F.H.); (A.H.); (M.D.K.); (E.A.T.K.); (F.T.); (M.E.); (C.B.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Franz Heppt
- Department of Dermatology, Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (A.W.); (T.S.); (F.H.); (A.H.); (M.D.K.); (E.A.T.K.); (F.T.); (M.E.); (C.B.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Annkathrin Hornung
- Department of Dermatology, Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (A.W.); (T.S.); (F.H.); (A.H.); (M.D.K.); (E.A.T.K.); (F.T.); (M.E.); (C.B.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Matthias D. Kaufmann
- Department of Dermatology, Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (A.W.); (T.S.); (F.H.); (A.H.); (M.D.K.); (E.A.T.K.); (F.T.); (M.E.); (C.B.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Elias A. T. Koch
- Department of Dermatology, Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (A.W.); (T.S.); (F.H.); (A.H.); (M.D.K.); (E.A.T.K.); (F.T.); (M.E.); (C.B.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Frédéric Toussaint
- Department of Dermatology, Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (A.W.); (T.S.); (F.H.); (A.H.); (M.D.K.); (E.A.T.K.); (F.T.); (M.E.); (C.B.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Michael Erdmann
- Department of Dermatology, Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (A.W.); (T.S.); (F.H.); (A.H.); (M.D.K.); (E.A.T.K.); (F.T.); (M.E.); (C.B.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Carola Berking
- Department of Dermatology, Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (A.W.); (T.S.); (F.H.); (A.H.); (M.D.K.); (E.A.T.K.); (F.T.); (M.E.); (C.B.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Markus V. Heppt
- Department of Dermatology, Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (A.W.); (T.S.); (F.H.); (A.H.); (M.D.K.); (E.A.T.K.); (F.T.); (M.E.); (C.B.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-9131-85-35747
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
SARS-CoV-2, causing the lethal disease COVid-19, is a public health emergency in the 2020 global pandemic. The outbreak and fast spreading of SARS-CoV-2 have a high morbidity and mortality specifically in elder patients with chronic diseases such as diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension, chronic kidney disease, and organ transplanted patients with immunosuppressive therapy. Preliminary results support different treatments such as chloroquine and convalescent plasma infusion in severe cases, with good outcome. On the other hand, the efficacy of supplementation with active vitamin D, an immunomodulator hormone with antiinflammatory and antimicrobial effects, is unproven. A recent study reported that vitamin D attains antiviral effects, via blocking viral replication directly. SARS-CoV-2 primarily uses the immune evasion process during infection via the envelope spike glycoprotein, which is followed by a cytokine storm, causing severe acute respiratory disease syndrome and death. SARS-CoV-2, by using the well-known angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 by the protein spike, as the host receptor to enter into alveolar, myocardial, and renal epithelial cells, can be disrupted by vitamin D. However, the correlation between vitamin D levels and COVID-19 deaths in previous studies was insignificant. Retrospective studies demonstrated a correlation between vitamin D status and COVID-19 severity and mortality, while other studies did not find this correlation. Studies have shown that, vitamin D reduces the risk of acute viral respiratory tract infections and pneumonia via direct inhibition of viral replication, antiinflammatory and immunomodulatory effects. The data available today regarding the beneficial protective effect of vitamin D is unclear and with conflicting results. Large randomized control trials are necessary to test this hypothesis. In this review, we will explain the cross talk between the active vitamin D and the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2, and summarize the data from the literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nakhoul Farid
- Nephrology and Hypertension Division, Baruch Padeh Poriya medical Center, Erlangen, Germany.
- Diabetes and Metabolism Lab, Baruch Padeh Poriya Medical Center, Erlangen, Germany.
- Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel.
| | - Nakhoul Rola
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Elias A T Koch
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Nakhoul Nakhoul
- Ophtalmology Division, Baruch Padeh Poriya Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Steeb T, Koch EAT, Wessely A, Wiest LG, Schmitz L, Berking C, Heppt MV. Chemical peelings for the treatment of actinic keratosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2020; 35:641-649. [PMID: 32745330 DOI: 10.1111/jdv.16844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2020] [Accepted: 07/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Actinic keratosis (AK) is a common precancerous lesion of the skin that may be treated with chemical peelings. Despite their long-standing usage and clinical experience, no evidence-based recommendation regarding the efficacy and safety of chemical peelings for AK exists. OBJECTIVES To systematically review and synthesize the current knowledge on chemically exfoliative peelings as interventions for AK. METHODS We performed a systematic literature research in Medline, Embase and CENTRAL and hand-searched pertinent trial registers for eligible records until 5 August 2019. Results from individual studies were pooled using a random-effects model or described in a qualitative synthesis. The risk of bias was estimated with the tools provided by the Cochrane Collaboration (randomized and non-randomized trials) and the Evidence Project (single-arm trials). RESULTS Four randomized controlled trials, two non-randomized controlled trials and two single-arm studies with a total sample size of n = 170 patients were included. Trichloroacetic acid (TCA) plus Jessner's solution showed significantly lower participant complete clearance (RR 0.36, 95% CI: 0.14-0.90, two studies, I2 = 0%, P = 0.03) and lower lesion clearance (RR 0.92, 95% CI: 0.85-0.99, one study, P = 0.03) compared to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 5% cream. TCA as monotherapy showed lower lesion complete clearance (RR 0.75, 95% CI: 0.69-0.82, two studies, I2 = 7%, P < 0.001) and lower mean lesion reduction per patient compared to conventional photodynamic therapy (cPDT) (MD -20.48, 95% CI: -31.55 to -9.41, two studies, I2 = 43%, P = 0.0003). Pain was more pronounced in patients treated with cPDT in comparison with TCA (MD -1.71 95% CI: -3.02 to -0.41, two studies, I2 = 55%, P = 0.01). In the single-arm studies, 5-FU plus glycolic acid showed 92% lesion clearance and phenol peeling 90.6% participant complete clearance. All studies showed a high risk for bias. CONCLUSIONS Future high-quality studies and a standardization of peeling protocols are warranted to determine the value of chemical peelings in the treatment of AK.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Steeb
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - E A T Koch
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - A Wessely
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - L G Wiest
- Private Practice of Dermatology, Munich, Germany
| | - L Schmitz
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Ruhr-University, Bochum, Germany.,Institute of Dermatopathology, MVZ Corius DermPathBonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - C Berking
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - M V Heppt
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Steeb T, Wessely A, Harlaß M, Heppt F, Koch EAT, Leiter U, Garbe C, Schöffski O, Berking C, Heppt MV. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Interventions for Actinic Keratosis from Post-Marketing Surveillance Trials. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9072253. [PMID: 32679902 PMCID: PMC7408895 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9072253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2020] [Revised: 07/12/2020] [Accepted: 07/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Multiple interventions are available for the treatment of actinic keratosis (AK) showing high efficacy in pivotal trials. However, data from post-marketing surveillance studies have received little attention until now. Here, we systematically investigate interventions for AK from post-marketing surveillance trials as a proxy for real-world efficacy and tolerability. A systematic literature search was conducted in Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL. Pertinent trial registers were hand-searched until 25 March 2020. Results were pooled using a random-effects model to calculate pooled proportions and relative risks (RR) or were described qualitatively. Eleven records with a total sample size of n = 4109 were included. Three of the studies had an active-controlled design, while seven were single-armed. Participant complete clearance ranged from 23.1% for diclofenac sodium 3% gel to 88.9% for ingenol mebutate 0.05% gel. The lesion-specific clearance rate for photodynamic therapy (PDT) was 74% (95% confidence interval (CI) 56–87%). The recurrence rate was significantly higher for diclofenac sodium 3% in comparison to imiquimod 5% cream (RR 1.10, 95% CI 1.02–1.1.8) and ranged from 10.6% for ingenol mebutate 0.015% gel to 23.5% for PDT. Few patients discontinued the trials due to adverse events. The results from the majority of the post-marketing surveillance studies deviated from those of pivotal trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theresa Steeb
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (T.S.); (A.W.); (F.H.); (E.A.T.K.); (C.B.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Anja Wessely
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (T.S.); (A.W.); (F.H.); (E.A.T.K.); (C.B.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Matthias Harlaß
- Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, 6211 LK Maastricht, The Netherlands;
| | - Franz Heppt
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (T.S.); (A.W.); (F.H.); (E.A.T.K.); (C.B.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Elias A. T. Koch
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (T.S.); (A.W.); (F.H.); (E.A.T.K.); (C.B.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Ulrike Leiter
- Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (U.L.); (C.G.)
| | - Claus Garbe
- Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (U.L.); (C.G.)
| | - Oliver Schöffski
- School of Business, Economics and Society, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 90403 Nürnberg, Germany;
| | - Carola Berking
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (T.S.); (A.W.); (F.H.); (E.A.T.K.); (C.B.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Markus V. Heppt
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (T.S.); (A.W.); (F.H.); (E.A.T.K.); (C.B.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-9131-8535747
| |
Collapse
|