1
|
Li G, Tholance Y, Mallouk N, Waeckel L, Flandrin P, Bali B, Badet L, Cornillon P. Quantification of Urinary Exosomal Prostate-Specific Antigen for the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer Using Clinical Laboratory-Based Techniques: Protocol for a Case-Control Study. JMIR Res Protoc 2024; 13:e63551. [PMID: 39024018 PMCID: PMC11425016 DOI: 10.2196/63551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2024] [Revised: 07/15/2024] [Accepted: 07/16/2024] [Indexed: 07/20/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men and represents a major public health problem. The current method for the diagnosis or screening of prostate cancer is invasive and costly. There have been renewed and innovative studies searching for urinary biomarkers to aid in the diagnosis of prostate cancer, especially with technologies based on urinary exosomes. However, technologies based on urine exosomes usually need expensive machines such as an ultracentrifuge and they are difficult to standardize, which hinder their application in clinical laboratories. We have optimized and standardized the isolation of urinary exosomes with the precipitation method. We have found that urinary exosomal prostate-specific antigen (PSA) can be quantified by automatic Elecsys total PSA technique. OBJECTIVE In this study, our objective is to utilize urinary exosomes from prostate cancer for the development of a test to aid in its diagnosis. METHODS Exosomes from the prostate cancer cell line LNCaP was used to set up the technique. To analyze urine samples from patients, the methods include the collection of first-void urine using the Colli-Pee device, the isolation of urine exosomes using the optimized precipitation method, and the quantification of exosomal PSA by Elecsys total PSA. RESULTS This will be a 2-year study. We will start including patients and controls in the last quarter of 2024. We expect the results to be published in the second quarter of 2027. CONCLUSIONS This is the first study to quantify urinary exosomal PSA using the Elecsys total PSA technique for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. This study emphasizes techniques that are suitable for implementation in clinical laboratories, which will facilitate the application of urinary exosomes to simplify and improve the diagnosis and screening of prostate cancer. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) PRR1-10.2196/63551.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guorong Li
- Department of Urology, North Hospital, CHU Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Yannick Tholance
- Laboratory of Biochemistry, North Hospital, CHU Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Nora Mallouk
- Center of Electronic Microscopy, CMES, Faculty of Medicine, University of Jean Monnet, Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Louis Waeckel
- Department of Urology, North Hospital, CHU Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France
- Laboratory of Flow Cytometry, Immunology Laboratory, North Hospital, CHU Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Pascale Flandrin
- Laboratory of Molecular Biology, North Hospital, CHU Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Bruno Bali
- Department of Urology, North Hospital, CHU Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Lionel Badet
- Department of Urology, North Hospital, CHU Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Pierre Cornillon
- Department of Medical Oncology, North Hospital, CHU Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pavlovic B, Bräutigam K, Dartiguenave F, Martel P, Rakauskas A, Cesson V, Veit M, Oechslin P, Gu A, Hermanns T, Saba K, Poyet C, Hötker AM, Rupp NJ, Valerio M, Derré L, Eberli D, Banzola I. Urine biomarkers can predict prostate cancer and PI-RADS score prior to biopsy. Sci Rep 2024; 14:18148. [PMID: 39103428 PMCID: PMC11300834 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-68026-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2024] [Indexed: 08/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) based screening of prostate cancer (PCa) needs refinement. The aim of this study was the identification of urinary biomarkers to predict the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score and the presence of PCa prior to prostate biopsy. Urine samples from patients with elevated PSA were collected prior to prostate biopsy (cohort = 99). The re-analysis of mass spectrometry data from 45 samples was performed to identify urinary biomarkers to predict the PI-RADS score and the presence of PCa. The most promising candidates, i.e. SPARC-like protein 1 (SPARCL1), Lymphatic vessel endothelial hyaluronan receptor 1 (LYVE1), Alpha-1-microglobulin/bikunin precursor (AMBP), keratin 13 (KRT13), cluster of differentiation 99 (CD99) and hornerin (HRNR), were quantified by ELISA and validated in an independent cohort of 54 samples. Various biomarker combinations showed the ability to predict the PI-RADS score (AUC = 0.79). In combination with the PI-RADS score, the biomarkers improve the detection of prostate carcinoma-free men (AUC = 0.89) and of those with clinically significant PCa (AUC = 0.93). We have uncovered the potential of urinary biomarkers for a test that allows a more stringent prioritization of mpMRI use and improves the decision criteria for prostate biopsy, minimizing patient burden by decreasing the number of unnecessary prostate biopsies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Blaz Pavlovic
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Zürich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Konstantin Bräutigam
- Institute of Tissue Medicine and Pathology, University of Bern, Murtenstrasse 31, 3008, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zürich, 8091, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Florence Dartiguenave
- Department of Urology, Urology Research Unit and Urology Biobank, University Hospital of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1005, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Paul Martel
- Department of Urology, Urology Research Unit and Urology Biobank, University Hospital of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1005, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Arnas Rakauskas
- Department of Urology, Urology Research Unit and Urology Biobank, University Hospital of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1005, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Valérie Cesson
- Department of Urology, Urology Research Unit and Urology Biobank, University Hospital of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1005, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Markus Veit
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Zürich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Pascal Oechslin
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Zürich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Alexander Gu
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Zürich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Hermanns
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Zürich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Karim Saba
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Zürich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Cédric Poyet
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Zürich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Andreas M Hötker
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Niels J Rupp
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zürich, 8091, Zürich, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Zürich, Pestalozzistrasse 3, 8032, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Massimo Valerio
- Department of Urology, Urology Research Unit and Urology Biobank, University Hospital of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1005, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1205, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Laurent Derré
- Department of Urology, Urology Research Unit and Urology Biobank, University Hospital of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1005, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Eberli
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Zürich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Irina Banzola
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Zürich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zürich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kofanova O, Paul S, Pexaras A, Bellora C, Petersons A, Schmitt M, Baker Berjaoui M, Qaoud Y, Kenk M, Wagner H, Fleshner N, Betsou F. Biospecimen Qualification in a Clinical Biobank of Urological Diseases. Biopreserv Biobank 2024; 22:257-267. [PMID: 37878356 DOI: 10.1089/bio.2022.0190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Development of novel biomarkers for diagnosis of disease and assessment of treatment efficacy utilizes a wide range of biospecimens for discovery research. The fitness of biospecimens for the purpose of biomarker development depends on the clinical characteristics of the donor and on a number of critical and potentially uncontrolled pre-analytical variables. Pre-analytical factors influence the reliability of the biomarkers to be analyzed and can seriously impact analytic outcomes. Sample quality stratification assays and tools can be utilized by biorepositories to minimize bias resulting from samples' inconsistent quality. In this study, we evaluated the quality of biobanked specimens by comparing analytical outcomes at 1, 5, and 10 years after collection. Our results demonstrate that currently available assays and tools can be used by biobank laboratories to support objective biospecimen qualification. We have established a workflow to monitor the quality of different types of biospecimens and, in this study, present the results of a qualification exercise applied to fluid samples and their derivatives in the context of urological diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olga Kofanova
- Integrated Biobank of Luxembourg (IBBL), Luxembourg Institute of Health (LIH), Dudelange, Luxembourg
| | - Sangita Paul
- McCain GU BioBank (MGB), University Health Network-Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Achilleas Pexaras
- Integrated Biobank of Luxembourg (IBBL), Luxembourg Institute of Health (LIH), Dudelange, Luxembourg
| | - Camille Bellora
- Integrated Biobank of Luxembourg (IBBL), Luxembourg Institute of Health (LIH), Dudelange, Luxembourg
| | - Ala Petersons
- Integrated Biobank of Luxembourg (IBBL), Luxembourg Institute of Health (LIH), Dudelange, Luxembourg
| | - Margaux Schmitt
- Integrated Biobank of Luxembourg (IBBL), Luxembourg Institute of Health (LIH), Dudelange, Luxembourg
| | - Mohamad Baker Berjaoui
- McCain GU BioBank (MGB), University Health Network-Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Yazan Qaoud
- McCain GU BioBank (MGB), University Health Network-Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Miran Kenk
- McCain GU BioBank (MGB), University Health Network-Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Heidi Wagner
- McCain GU BioBank (MGB), University Health Network-Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Neil Fleshner
- McCain GU BioBank (MGB), University Health Network-Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Fay Betsou
- Integrated Biobank of Luxembourg (IBBL), Luxembourg Institute of Health (LIH), Dudelange, Luxembourg
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Amparore D, DE Cillis S, Granato S, Ortenzi M, Della Corte M, Sica M, Piana A, Verri P, DE Luca S, Manfredi M, Fiori C, Mengozzi G, Bergamaschi E, Mariella G, Occhipinti S, Porpiglia F. Urinary PSA-ZINC biomarker outperforms standard of care in early detection of prostate cancer. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2024; 76:340-350. [PMID: 38864687 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.24.05783-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Urine is a promising biological fluid for prostate cancer (PCa) diagnostics due to its non-invasive collection and wide range of biomarkers. The aim of this study was to assess the role of urinary PSA (uPSA) and urinary Zinc (uZinc) as biomarkers for the diagnosis of PCa in combination with routine parameters of standard of care (SOC - blood PSA, abnormal DRE, age) and MRI in patients candidates for prostate biopsy. METHODS Urine samples after prostatic massages were collected from men with suspected PCa scheduled for prostate biopsy. Quantification of uPSA was performed by ECLIA platform and confirmed by ELISA assay, while uZinc measurement was evaluated by ICP-MS and confirmed by colorimetric in vitro assay. Six multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed to assess diagnostic performance of uPSA and uZinc (urine), SOC and MRI alone, and combination of MRI+SOC, MRI+urine and SOC+MRI+urine. The discriminative power of the logistic models was assessed by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUC). RESULTS Two hundred thirty-eight patients were included in the analysis; 145 of them were diagnosed with PCa. Urine test showed a better discrimination of HS from CP, in respect of uPSA and uZinc alone, both for PCa of any grade and Gleason Score ≥7 (4+3) (AUC 0.804 and 0.823 respectively). ROC curve combining SOC+MRI+urine showed an AUC=0.882, that is statistically different from SOC or MRI alone, or MRI+SOC (P=0.0001, P=0.0001, and P=0.008 respectively). PCa risk algorithm designed considering SOC+MRI+urine results in potential reduction of 57% of unnecessary biopsies compared to the current standard parameters. CONCLUSIONS The loss of uPSA and Zinc production and secretion during neoplastic transformation of the prostate could potentially represent a hallmark of PCa. Its combination with age, PSA and DRE, as well as with mpMRI could represent an interesting approach to improve the diagnostic accuracy of PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniele Amparore
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy -
| | - Sabrina DE Cillis
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Stefano Granato
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Michele Ortenzi
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Marcello Della Corte
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Michele Sica
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Alberto Piana
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Paolo Verri
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Stefano DE Luca
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Matteo Manfredi
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Cristian Fiori
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Giulio Mengozzi
- Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory, Department of Laboratory Medicine, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Enrico Bergamaschi
- Laboratory of Toxicology and Industrial Epidemiology, Department of Public Health Sciences and Pediatrics, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Mariella
- Laboratory of Toxicology and Industrial Epidemiology, Department of Public Health Sciences and Pediatrics, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Sergio Occhipinti
- NIB biotec Srl, Innovation Center, Turin, Italy
- Department of Molecular Biotechnologies and Health Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Miglione A, Di Nardo F, Cavalera S, Serra T, Baggiani C, Cinti S, Anfossi L. Merging Lateral Flow Immunoassay with Electroanalysis as a Novel Sensing Platform: Prostate Specific Antigen Detection as Case of Study. Anal Chem 2024; 96:2297-2302. [PMID: 38289028 DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.3c04078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/15/2024]
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) strips as the most known point-of-care (POC) devices enabling rapid and easy detection of relevant biomarkers by nonspecialists. However, these diagnostic tests are usually associated with the qualitative detection of the biomarker of interest. Alternatively, electrochemical-based diagnostics, especially known for diabetes care, enable quantitative determination of biomarkers. From an analytical point perspective, the combination of the two approaches might represent a step forward for the POC world: in fact, electrochemical transduction is attractive to be integrated into LFIA strips due to its simplicity, high sensitivity, fast signal generation, and cost effectiveness. In this work, a LFIA strip has been combined with an electrochemical transduction, yielding an electrochemical LFIA (eLFIA). As a proof-of-concept method, the detection of prostate-specific antigen has been carried out by combining a printed-electrochemical strip with the traditional LFIA tests. The electrochemical detection has been based on the measurement of Au ions produced from the dissolution of the gold nanoparticles previously captured on the test line. The analytical performances obtained at LFIA and eLFIA were compared, highlighting how the use of differential pulse voltammetry allowed for a lower detection limit (2.5-fold), respectively, 0.38 and 0.15 ng/mL, but increasing the time of analysis. Although the correlation between the two architectures confirmed the satisfactory agreement of outputs, this technical note has been thought to provide the reader a fair statement with regard to the strength and drawbacks about combining the two (apparently) competitor devices in a diagnostics field, namely, LFIA and electrochemical strips.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonella Miglione
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Naples "Federico II", Via Domenico Montesano 49, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Fabio Di Nardo
- Department of Chemistry, Università degli Studi di Torino, 10124 Turin, Italy
| | - Simone Cavalera
- Department of Chemistry, Università degli Studi di Torino, 10124 Turin, Italy
| | - Thea Serra
- Department of Chemistry, Università degli Studi di Torino, 10124 Turin, Italy
| | - Claudio Baggiani
- Department of Chemistry, Università degli Studi di Torino, 10124 Turin, Italy
| | - Stefano Cinti
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Naples "Federico II", Via Domenico Montesano 49, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Laura Anfossi
- Department of Chemistry, Università degli Studi di Torino, 10124 Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Höti N, Lih TS, Dong M, Zhang Z, Mangold L, Partin AW, Sokoll LJ, Kay Li Q, Zhang H. Urinary PSA and Serum PSA for Aggressive Prostate Cancer Detection. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15030960. [PMID: 36765916 PMCID: PMC9913326 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15030960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2022] [Revised: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Serum PSA, together with digital rectal examination and imaging of the prostate gland, have remained the gold standard in urological practices for the management of and intervention for prostate cancer. Based on these adopted practices, the limitations of serum PSA in identifying aggressive prostate cancer has led us to evaluate whether urinary PSA levels might have any clinical utility in prostate cancer diagnosis. Utilizing the Access Hybritech PSA assay, we evaluated a total of n = 437 urine specimens from post-DRE prostate cancer patients. In our initial cohort, PSA tests from a total of one hundred and forty-six (n = 146) urine specimens were obtained from patients with aggressive (Gleason Score ≥ 8, n = 76) and non-aggressive (Gleason Score = 6, n = 70) prostate cancer. A second cohort, with a larger set of n = 291 urine samples from patients with aggressive (GS ≥ 7, n = 168) and non-aggressive (GS = 6, n = 123) prostate cancer, was also utilized in our study. Our data demonstrated that patients with aggressive disease had lower levels of urinary PSA compared to the non-aggressive patients, while the serum PSA levels were higher in patients with aggressive prostate disease. The discordance between serum and urine PSA levels was further validated by immuno-histochemistry (IHC) assay in biopsied tumors and in metastatic lesions (n = 62). Our data demonstrated that aggressive prostate cancer was negatively correlated with the PSA in prostate cancer tissues, and, unlike serum PSA, urinary PSA might serve a better surrogate for capitulating tissue milieus to detect aggressive prostate cancer. We further explored the utility of urine PSA as a cancer biomarker, either alone and in combination with serum PSA, and their ratio (serum to urine PSA) to predict disease status. Comparing the AUCs for the urine and serum PSA alone, we found that urinary PSA had a higher predictive power (AUC= 0.732) in detecting aggressive disease. Furthermore, combining the ratios between serum to urine PSA with urine and serum assay enhanced the performance (AUC = 0.811) in predicting aggressive prostate disease. These studies support the role of urinary PSA in combination with serum for detecting aggressive prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naseruddin Höti
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
- Department of Pathology, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA
| | - Tung-Shing Lih
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Mingming Dong
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Zhen Zhang
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA
| | - Leslie Mangold
- Department of Urology, The Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Alan W. Partin
- Department of Urology, The Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Lori J. Sokoll
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA
- Department of Urology, The Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Qing Kay Li
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA
| | - Hui Zhang
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA
- Department of Urology, The Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +410-502-8149; Fax: +443-287-6388
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Terracciano D, La Civita E, Athanasiou A, Liotti A, Fiorenza M, Cennamo M, Crocetto F, Tennstedt P, Schiess R, Haese A, Ferro M, Steuber T. New strategy for the identification of prostate cancer: The combination of Proclarix and the prostate health index. Prostate 2022; 82:1469-1476. [PMID: 35971798 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2022] [Revised: 06/10/2022] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Prostate health index (PHI) and, more recently, Proclarix have been proposed as serum biomarkers for prostate cancer (PCa). In this study, we aimed to evaluate Proclarix and PHI for predicting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). PATIENTS AND METHODS Proclarix and PHI were measured using samples of 344 men from two different centers. All patients underwent prostate biopsy, and among those, 188 men with PCa on biopsy had an additional radical prostatectomy (RP). All men had a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) between 2 and 10 ng/ml. Evaluation of area under the curve (AUC) and performance at predefined cut-offs of Proclarix and PHI risk scores as well as the linear combination thereof was performed to predict csPCa. PSA density was used as an independent comparator. RESULTS The cohort median age and PSA were 65 (interquartile range [IQR]: 60-71) and 5.6 (IQR: 4.3-7.2) ng/ml, respectively. CsPCa was diagnosed in 161 (47%) men based on the RP specimen. ROC analysis showed that Proclarix and PHI accurately predicted csPCa with no significant difference (AUC of 0.79 and 0.76, p = 0.378) but significantly better when compared to PSA density (AUC of 0.66, p < 0.001). When using specific cut-offs, Proclarix (cut-off 10) revealed higher specificity and positive predictive value than PHI (cut-off 27) at similar sensitivities. The combination of Proclarix and PHI provided a significant increase in the AUC (p ≤ 0.007) compared to the individual tests alone and the highest clinical benefit was achieved. CONCLUSION Results of this study show that both Proclarix and PHI accurately detect the presence of csPCa. The model combining Proclarix and PHI revealed the synergistic effect and improved the diagnostic performance of the individual tests.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela Terracciano
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Evelina La Civita
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | | | - Antonietta Liotti
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Mariano Fiorenza
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Michele Cennamo
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Felice Crocetto
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Pierre Tennstedt
- Martini-Klinik, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ralph Schiess
- Proteomedix AG, Research & Development, Zurich-Schlieren, Switzerland
| | - Alexander Haese
- Martini-Klinik, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Matteo Ferro
- Division of Urology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Thomas Steuber
- Martini-Klinik, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Man YG, Mannion C, Jewett A, Hsiao YH, Liu A, Semczuk A, Zarogoulidis P, Gapeev AB, Cimadamore A, Lee P, Lopez-Beltran A, Montironi R, Massari F, Lu X, Cheng L. The most effective but largely ignored target for prostate cancer early detection and intervention. J Cancer 2022; 13:3463-3475. [PMID: 36313040 PMCID: PMC9608211 DOI: 10.7150/jca.72973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Accepted: 10/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Over the past two decades, the global efforts for the early detection and intervention of prostate cancer seem to have made significant progresses in the basic researches, but the clinic outcomes have been disappointing: (1) prostate cancer is still the most common non-cutaneous cancer in Europe in men, (2) the age-standardized prostate cancer rate has increased in nearly all Asian and African countries, (3) the proportion of advanced cancers at the diagnosis has increased to 8.2% from 3.9% in the USA, (4) the worldwide use of PSA testing and digital rectal examination have failed to reduce the prostate cancer mortality, and (5) there is still no effective preventive method to significantly reduce the development, invasion, and metastasis of prostate cancer… Together, these facts strongly suggest that the global efforts during the past appear to be not in a correlated target with markedly inconsistent basic research and clinic outcomes. The most likely cause for the inconsistence appears due to the fact that basic scientific studies are traditionally conducted on the cell lines and animal models, where it is impossible to completely reflect or replicate the in vivo status. Thus, we would like to propose the human prostate basal cell layer (PBCL) as “the most effective target for the early detection and intervention of prostate cancer”. Our proposal is based on the morphologic, immunohistochemical and molecular evidence from our recent studies of normal and cancerous human prostate tissues with detailed clinic follow-up data. We believe that the human tissue-derived basic research data may provide a more realistic roadmap to guide the clinic practice and to avoid the potential misleading from in vitro and animal studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan-gao Man
- Department of Pathology, Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, Nutley, NJ, USA,✉ Corresponding authors: Yan-gao Man., MD., PhD. E-mail: or or Liang Cheng., MD. E-mail: or
| | - Ciaran Mannion
- Department of Pathology, Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, Nutley, NJ, USA
| | - Anahid Jewett
- Tumor Immunology Laboratory, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, UCLA School of Dentistry and Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Yi-Hsuan Hsiao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan
| | - Aijun Liu
- Department of Pathology, Chinese PLA General Hospital 7 th Medical Center, Beijing, China
| | - Andrzej Semczuk
- II ND Department of Gynecology, Lublin Medical University, Lublin, Poland
| | - Paul Zarogoulidis
- Pulmonary-Oncology Department, "Theageneio" Cancer Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Andrei B. Gapeev
- Laboratory of Biological Effects of Non-Ionizing Radiation, Institute of Cell Biophysics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Russian Federation
| | - Alessia Cimadamore
- Section of Pathological Anatomy, Polytechnic University of the Marche Region, School of Medicine, United Hospitals, Ancona, Italy
| | - Peng Lee
- Department of Pathology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Pathology, New York Harbor Healthcare System, New York, NY, USA
| | - Antonio Lopez-Beltran
- Department of Morphological Sciences, Cordoba University Medical School, Cordoba, Spain
| | - Rodolfo Montironi
- Molecular Medicine and Cell Therapy Foundation, Department of Clinical & Molecular Sciences, Polytechnic University of the Marche Region, Ancona, Italy
| | - Francesco Massari
- Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Xin Lu
- Department of Biological Sciences, Boler-Parseghian Center for Rare and Neglected Diseases, Harper Cancer Research Institute, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA.,Tumor Microenvironment and Metastasis Program, Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Liang Cheng
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Brown University Medical School
- Lifespan Academic Medical Center, RI, USA.,✉ Corresponding authors: Yan-gao Man., MD., PhD. E-mail: or or Liang Cheng., MD. E-mail: or
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wang Y, Gao Y, Song Y. Microfluidics-Based Urine Biopsy for Cancer Diagnosis: Recent Advances and Future Trends. ChemMedChem 2022; 17:e202200422. [PMID: 36040297 DOI: 10.1002/cmdc.202200422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2022] [Revised: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Urine biopsy, allowing for the detection, analysis and monitoring of numerous cancer-associated urinary biomarkers to provide insights into cancer occurrence, progression and metastasis, has emerged as an attractive liquid biopsy strategy with enormous advantages over traditional tissue biopsy, such as noninvasiveness, large sample volume, and simple sampling operation. Microfluidics enables precise manipulation of fluids in a tiny chip and exhibits outstanding performance in urine biopsy owing to its minimization, low cost, high integration, high throughput and low sample consumption. Herein, we review recent advances in microfluidic techniques employed in urine biopsy for cancer detection. After briefly summarizing the major urinary biomarkers used for cancer diagnosis, we provide an overview of the typical microfluidic techniques utilized to develop urine biopsy devices. Some prospects along with the major challenges to be addressed for the future of microfluidic-based urine biopsy are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanping Wang
- Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Sino-French Engineer School, CHINA
| | - Yanfeng Gao
- Nanjing University, College of Engineering and Applied Sciences, CHINA
| | - Yujun Song
- Nanjing University, Biomedical Engineering, 22 Hankou Road, 210093, Nanjing, CHINA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rios-Colon L, Chijioke J, Niture S, Afzal Z, Qi Q, Srivastava A, Ramalinga M, Kedir H, Cagle P, Arthur E, Sharma M, Moore J, Deep G, Suy S, Collins SP, Kumar D. Leptin modulated microRNA-628-5p targets Jagged-1 and inhibits prostate cancer hallmarks. Sci Rep 2022; 12:10073. [PMID: 35710817 PMCID: PMC9203512 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-13279-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2022] [Accepted: 05/23/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are single-stranded non-coding RNA molecules that play a regulatory role in gene expression and cancer cell signaling. We previously identified miR-628-5p (miR-628) as a potential biomarker in serum samples from men with prostate cancer (PCa) (Srivastava et al. in Tumour Biol 35:4867–4873, 10.1007/s13277-014-1638-1, 2014). This study examined the detailed cellular phenotypes and pathways regulated by miR-628 in PCa cells. Since obesity is a significant risk factor for PCa, and there is a correlation between levels of the obesity-associated hormone leptin and PCa development, here we investigated the functional relationship between leptin and miR-628 regulation in PCa. We demonstrated that exposure to leptin downregulated the expression of miR-628 and increased cell proliferation/migration in PCa cells. We next studied the effects on cancer-related phenotypes in PCa cells after altering miR-628 expression levels. Enforced expression of miR-628 in PCa cells inhibited cell proliferation, reduced PCa cell survival/migration/invasion/spheroid formation, and decreased markers of cell stemness. Mechanistically, miR-628 binds with the JAG1-3′UTR and inhibits the expression of Jagged-1 (JAG1). JAG1 inhibition by miR-628 downregulated Notch signaling, decreased the expression of Snail/Slug, and modulated epithelial-mesenchymal transition and invasiveness in PC3 cells. Furthermore, expression of miR-628 in PCa cells increased sensitivity towards the drugs enzalutamide and docetaxel by induction of cell apoptosis. Collectively our data suggest that miR-628 is a key regulator of PCa carcinogenesis and is modulated by leptin, offering a novel therapeutic opportunity to inhibit the growth of advanced PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leslimar Rios-Colon
- Julius L. Chambers Biomedical/Biotechnology Research Institute (BBRI), North Carolina Central University, 1801 Fayetteville St., Durham, NC, 27707, USA.,Department of Cancer Biology, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA
| | - Juliet Chijioke
- Julius L. Chambers Biomedical/Biotechnology Research Institute (BBRI), North Carolina Central University, 1801 Fayetteville St., Durham, NC, 27707, USA
| | - Suryakant Niture
- Julius L. Chambers Biomedical/Biotechnology Research Institute (BBRI), North Carolina Central University, 1801 Fayetteville St., Durham, NC, 27707, USA
| | - Zainab Afzal
- Julius L. Chambers Biomedical/Biotechnology Research Institute (BBRI), North Carolina Central University, 1801 Fayetteville St., Durham, NC, 27707, USA
| | - Qi Qi
- Julius L. Chambers Biomedical/Biotechnology Research Institute (BBRI), North Carolina Central University, 1801 Fayetteville St., Durham, NC, 27707, USA
| | - Anvesha Srivastava
- Julius L. Chambers Biomedical/Biotechnology Research Institute (BBRI), North Carolina Central University, 1801 Fayetteville St., Durham, NC, 27707, USA
| | - Malathi Ramalinga
- Julius L. Chambers Biomedical/Biotechnology Research Institute (BBRI), North Carolina Central University, 1801 Fayetteville St., Durham, NC, 27707, USA
| | - Habib Kedir
- Julius L. Chambers Biomedical/Biotechnology Research Institute (BBRI), North Carolina Central University, 1801 Fayetteville St., Durham, NC, 27707, USA
| | - Patrice Cagle
- Julius L. Chambers Biomedical/Biotechnology Research Institute (BBRI), North Carolina Central University, 1801 Fayetteville St., Durham, NC, 27707, USA
| | - Elena Arthur
- Julius L. Chambers Biomedical/Biotechnology Research Institute (BBRI), North Carolina Central University, 1801 Fayetteville St., Durham, NC, 27707, USA
| | - Mitu Sharma
- Department of Cancer Biology, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA
| | - John Moore
- Julius L. Chambers Biomedical/Biotechnology Research Institute (BBRI), North Carolina Central University, 1801 Fayetteville St., Durham, NC, 27707, USA
| | - Gagan Deep
- Department of Cancer Biology, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA.,Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA
| | - Simeng Suy
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, 20057, USA
| | - Sean P Collins
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, 20057, USA
| | - Deepak Kumar
- Julius L. Chambers Biomedical/Biotechnology Research Institute (BBRI), North Carolina Central University, 1801 Fayetteville St., Durham, NC, 27707, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kulpakko J, Juusti V, Rannikko A, Hänninen PE. Detecting disease associated biomarkers by luminescence modulating phages. Sci Rep 2022; 12:2433. [PMID: 35165329 PMCID: PMC8844222 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-06433-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Assessment of risk for a given disease and the diagnosis of diseases is often based on assays detecting biomarkers. Antibody-based biomarker-assays for diseases such as prostate cancer are often ambiguous and biomarker proteins are frequently also elevated for reasons that are unspecific. We have opted to use luminescence modulating phages for the analysis of known acute inflammatory response biomarker CRP (C-reactive protein) and biomarkers of prostate cancer in urine samples. Firstly, CRP was used to simulate the detection process in a controlled chemical environment. Secondly, we tried to classify more challenging lethal prostate cancer samples from control samples. Our unique method utilizes a special biopanning process in order to create special phages capable of capturing a dye necessary for detection and potential biomarkers. As the biomarker-molecules interfere with the phages, dye is repelled from the phage network resulting in an altered reporter luminescence. These changes can be observed with an absorbance reader and even with the naked eye. The simple method could present an alternative for screening of disease biomarkers. For prostate cancer urine samples, we achieved a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 75% to detect Grade Group (GG) 4 and 5 prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janne Kulpakko
- Aqsens Health Ltd., Itäinen Pitkäkatu 4B, 20520, Turku, Finland. .,Laboratory of Biophysics and Medicity Research Laboratories, Institute of Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Turku, Tykistökatu 6A, 20520, Turku, Finland.
| | | | - Antti Rannikko
- Department of Urology, Helsinki University, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Pekka E Hänninen
- Aqsens Health Ltd., Itäinen Pitkäkatu 4B, 20520, Turku, Finland.,Laboratory of Biophysics and Medicity Research Laboratories, Institute of Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Turku, Tykistökatu 6A, 20520, Turku, Finland
| |
Collapse
|