1
|
Ju S, Rokohl AC, Guo Y, Yao K, Fan W, Heindl LM. Personalized treatment concepts in extraocular cancer. ADVANCES IN OPHTHALMOLOGY PRACTICE AND RESEARCH 2024; 4:69-77. [PMID: 38590555 PMCID: PMC10999489 DOI: 10.1016/j.aopr.2024.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2023] [Revised: 02/10/2024] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024]
Abstract
Background The periocular skin is neoplasms-prone to various benign and malignant. Periocular malignancies are more aggressive and challenging to cure and repair than those in other skin areas. In recent decades, immunotherapy has significantly advanced oncology, allowing the autoimmune system to target and destroy malignant cells. Skin malignancies, especially periocular tumors, are particularly sensitive to immunotherapy. This technique has dramatically impacted the successful treatment of challenging tumors. Main text Extraocular cancers, including eyelid (basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, melanoma, merkel cell carcinoma), conjunctival tumors (conjunctival melanoma, ocular surface squamous neoplasia) and other rare tumors, are unique and challenging clinical situations. Several genetic alterations associated with the pathogenesis of these diseases have been identified, and molecular mechanism are essential for the development of the immunotherapy agents, such as Hedgehog pathway inhibitors (vismodegib and sonidegib) for basal cell carcinoma, BRAF/MEK inhibitors (vemurafenib, dabrafenib, and encorafenib) for melanoma, and immune checkpoint inhibitors (Avelumab, pembrolizumab) for Merkel cell carcinoma. Conclusions The optimal treatment for periocular skin cancer depends on the type and size of the tumor and whether it involves orbital and adnexal structures. Adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy with chemotherapy-targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors should be considered based on tumor type, tumor molecular profile, expected response rate, and candidacy for systemic treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sitong Ju
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Straße, Cologne, Germany
| | - Alexander C. Rokohl
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Straße, Cologne, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Aachen-Bonn-Cologne-Duesseldorf, Cologne, Germany
| | - Yongwei Guo
- Eye Center, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Ke Yao
- Eye Center, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Wanlin Fan
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Straße, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ludwig M. Heindl
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Straße, Cologne, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Aachen-Bonn-Cologne-Duesseldorf, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Milman T, Grossniklaus HE, Goldman-Levy G, Kivelä TT, Coupland SE, White VA, Mudhar HS, Eberhart CG, Verdijk RM, Heegaard S, Gill AJ, Jager MJ, Rodríguez-Reyes AA, Esmaeli B, Hodge JC, Cree IA. The 5th Edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Tumours of the Eye and Orbit. Ocul Oncol Pathol 2023; 9:71-95. [PMID: 37900189 PMCID: PMC10601864 DOI: 10.1159/000530730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Tatyana Milman
- Departments of Ophthalmology and Pathology, Wills Eye Hospital, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Hans E. Grossniklaus
- Departments of Ophthalmology and Pathology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Gabrielle Goldman-Levy
- World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, Lyon, France
| | - Tero T. Kivelä
- Ophthalmic Pathology Laboratory, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Sarah E. Coupland
- George Holt Chair of Pathology/Consultant Histopathologist, Liverpool Clinical Laboratories, Liverpool University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Valerie A. White
- World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, Lyon, France
| | - Hardeep Singh Mudhar
- National Specialist Ophthalmic Pathology Service (NSOPS), Department of Histopathology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK
| | - Charles G. Eberhart
- Departments of Pathology and Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Robert M. Verdijk
- Section Ophthalmic Pathology, Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Steffen Heegaard
- Department of Pathology, Eye Pathology Section and Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anthony J. Gill
- Department of Pathology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Cancer Diagnosis and Pathology Group, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Royal North Shore Hospital St Leonards NSW, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
- NSW Health Pathology, Department of Anatomical Pathology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards NSW, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
| | - Martine J. Jager
- Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Abelardo A. Rodríguez-Reyes
- Ophthalmic Pathology Service, Asociación para Evitar la Ceguera en México, I.A.P. Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Bita Esmaeli
- Orbital Oncology and Ophthalmic Plastic Surgery, Department of Plastic Surgery, MDAnderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Ian A. Cree
- World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, Lyon, France
| | - on behalf of the WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board
- Departments of Ophthalmology and Pathology, Wills Eye Hospital, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Departments of Ophthalmology and Pathology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
- World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, Lyon, France
- Ophthalmic Pathology Laboratory, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
- George Holt Chair of Pathology/Consultant Histopathologist, Liverpool Clinical Laboratories, Liverpool University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
- National Specialist Ophthalmic Pathology Service (NSOPS), Department of Histopathology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK
- Departments of Pathology and Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Section Ophthalmic Pathology, Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Eye Pathology Section and Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Pathology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Cancer Diagnosis and Pathology Group, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Royal North Shore Hospital St Leonards NSW, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
- NSW Health Pathology, Department of Anatomical Pathology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards NSW, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
- Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Ophthalmic Pathology Service, Asociación para Evitar la Ceguera en México, I.A.P. Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Mexico City, Mexico
- Orbital Oncology and Ophthalmic Plastic Surgery, Department of Plastic Surgery, MDAnderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chang E, Demirci H, Demirci FY. Genetic Aspects of Conjunctival Melanoma: A Review. Genes (Basel) 2023; 14:1668. [PMID: 37761808 PMCID: PMC10530751 DOI: 10.3390/genes14091668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2023] [Revised: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Conjunctival melanoma (CM) is a rare but aggressive cancer. Over the past decade, molecular studies using rapidly advancing technologies have increasingly improved our understanding of CM genetics. CMs are mainly characterized by dysregulated MAPK and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathways, driven by commonly mutated (BRAF, NRAS, NF1) or less commonly mutated (KIT, PTEN) genes. Another group of genes frequently mutated in CMs include TERT and ATRX, with known roles in telomere maintenance and chromatin remodeling/epigenetic regulation. Uveal melanoma-related genes (BAP1, SF3B1, GNAQ/11) can also be mutated in CMs, albeit infrequently. Additional CM-related mutated genes have increasingly been identified using more comprehensive genetic analyses, awaiting further confirmation in additional/larger studies. As a tumor arising in a partly sun-exposed mucosal tissue, CM exhibits a distinct genomic profile, including the frequent presence of an ultraviolet (UV) signature (and high mutational load) and also the common occurrence of large structural variations (distributed across the genome) in addition to specific gene mutations. The knowledge gained from CM genetic studies to date has led to new therapeutic avenues, including the use of targeted and/or immuno-therapies with promising outcomes in several cases. Accordingly, the implementation of tumor genetic testing into the routine clinical care of CM patients holds promise to further improve and personalize their treatments. Likewise, a growing knowledge of poor prognosis-associated genetic changes in CMs (NRAS, TERT, and uveal melanoma signature mutations and chromosome 10q deletions) may ultimately guide future strategies for prognostic testing to further improve clinical outcomes (by tailoring surveillance and considering prophylactic treatments in patients with high-risk primary tumors).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Chang
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, USA
| | - Hakan Demirci
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, USA
| | - F. Yesim Demirci
- Department of Human Genetics, School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mudhar HS, Milman T, Stevenson S, Watson M, Kim J, Magan T, Salvi SM, Harley U, Lally SE, Shields CL. PRAME expression by immunohistochemistry and reverse transcription quantitative PCR in conjunctival melanocytic lesions-a comprehensive clinicopathologic study of 202 cases and correlation of cytogenetics with PRAME expression in challenging conjunctival melanocytic lesions. Hum Pathol 2023; 134:1-18. [PMID: 36804828 DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2023.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Revised: 01/28/2023] [Accepted: 02/04/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2023]
Abstract
This study examined PRAME (preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma) expression by immunohistochemistry and reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) in 202 histologically unequivocal conjunctival melanocytic lesions: 76 nevi, 29 benign melanoses, 25 low-grade conjunctival intraepithelial melanocytic lesions (LGCMIL), 26 high-grade conjunctival melanocytic intraepithelial lesions/in-situ melanoma (HGCMIL), and 46 invasive melanomas. PRAME score 0 was seen in 96% of nevi (73/76), 96% of benign melanoses (28/29), and 88% of LGCMIL (22/25). PRAME score 4 was seen in 50% HGCMIL (13/26) and 76% invasive melanomas (35/46). PRAME score 4 had a sensitivity of 50% and specificity of 100% in differentiating between HGCMIL and benign melanosis/LGCMIL. PRAME score 4 had a sensitivity of 76% and specificity of 100% in differentiating between melanoma and nevi. Relative quantification of PRAME mRNA expression by RT-qPCR was performed on 49 cases (24%): 17 nevi, 3 benign melanoses, 5 LGCMIL, 9 HGCMIL, and 15 invasive melanomas. The analysis generated two distinct groupings with 'high' relative PRAME expression for the HGCMIL and invasive melanoma and 'low/zero' expression for nevi, benign melanosis, and LGCMIL. Thirty-three challenging conjunctival melanocytic lesions that had previous fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis were studied: 18 nevi, 12 melanomas in a nevus, 2 nevoid melanomas, and 1 in-situ melanoma. All nevi (100%) showed concordance between negative FISH and PRAME (scores 0-3). Four of 13 melanomas (31%; in-situ, invasive, isolated, and in association with nevus) showed concordance between positive FISH and PRAME score 4. In conclusion, PRAME score 4 has 100% specificity for the diagnosis of HGCMIL and melanoma. PRAME is limited in its sensitivity in the evaluation of challenging melanocytic lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hardeep Singh Mudhar
- National Specialist Ophthalmic Pathology Service (NSOPS), Dept of Histopathology, E-Floor, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield S10 2JF, England, UK.
| | - Tatyana Milman
- Department of Pathology, Wills Eye Hospital, Sidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
| | - Sarah Stevenson
- Sheffield Diagnostic Genetics Service, Sheffield Children's Hospital, Sheffield S10 2TH, England, UK; The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, England, UK.
| | - Mark Watson
- Sheffield Diagnostic Genetics Service, Sheffield Children's Hospital, Sheffield S10 2TH, England, UK.
| | - Julie Kim
- Department of Pathology, Wills Eye Hospital, Sidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
| | - Tejal Magan
- Department of Pathology, Wills Eye Hospital, Sidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
| | - Sachin M Salvi
- Sheffield Ocular Oncology Service, Dept of Ophthalmology, A Floor, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield S10 2JF, UK.
| | - Umiya Harley
- Sheffield Ocular Oncology Service, Dept of Ophthalmology, A Floor, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield S10 2JF, UK.
| | - Sarah E Lally
- Ocular Oncology Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Sidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
| | - Carol L Shields
- Ocular Oncology Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Sidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lodde GC, Jansen P, Möller I, Sucker A, Hassel JC, Forschner A, Eckardt J, Meier F, Reinhardt L, Kähler KC, Ziemer M, Schlaak M, Rahimi F, Schatton K, Meiss F, Gutzmer R, Pföhler C, Terheyden P, Schilling B, Sachse M, Heppt MV, Sindrilaru A, Leiter U, Zaremba A, Thielmann CM, Ugurel S, Zimmer L, Hadaschik E, Bechrakis NE, Schadendorf D, Westekemper H, Livingstone E, Griewank KG. Genetic characterization of advanced conjunctival melanoma and response to systemic treatment. Eur J Cancer 2022; 166:60-72. [PMID: 35279471 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2021] [Accepted: 01/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Conjunctival melanoma is a rare type of ocular melanoma, which is prone to local recurrence and metastasis and can lead to patient death. Novel therapeutic strategies have revolutionized cutaneous melanoma management. The efficacy of these therapies in conjunctival melanoma, however, has not been evaluated in larger patient cohorts. METHODS In this multi-center retrospective cohort study with additional screening of the ADOREG database, data were collected from 34 patients with metastatic conjunctival melanoma who received targeted therapy (TT) (BRAF ± MEK inhibitors) or immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) (anti-PD-1 ± anti-CTLA4). In 15 cases, tissue was available for targeted next-generation-sequencing (611 genes) and RNA sequencing. Driver mutations, tumor mutational burden, copy number variations and inflammatory/IFNγ gene expression signatures were determined. RESULTS Genetic characterization identified frequent BRAF (46.7%, 7/15), NRAS (26.7%, 4/15), NF1 (20%, 3/15), and TERT promoter (46.7%, 7/15) mutations. UV associated C>T and CC>TT mutations were common. Median follow-up time after start of first TT or ICI therapy was 13.2 months. In 26 patients receiving first-line ICI, estimated one-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 42.0%, PFS and overall survival (OS) 6.2 and 18.0 months, respectively. First-line TT was given to 8 patients, estimated one-year PFS rate was 54.7%, median PFS and OS 12.6 and 29.1 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Our findings support the role of UV irradiation in conjunctival melanoma and the genetic similarity with cutaneous melanoma. Conjunctival melanoma patients with advanced disease benefit from both targeted therapies (BRAF ± MEK inhibitors) and immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georg C Lodde
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Philipp Jansen
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Inga Möller
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Antje Sucker
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Jessica C Hassel
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Andrea Forschner
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
| | - Julia Eckardt
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Friedegund Meier
- Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Centre Dresden and National Center for Tumor Diseases, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität (TU), Dresden, Germany.
| | - Lydia Reinhardt
- Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Centre Dresden and National Center for Tumor Diseases, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität (TU), Dresden, Germany.
| | - Katharina C Kähler
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
| | - Mirjana Ziemer
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
| | - Max Schlaak
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Berlin, Germany; Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, LMU University Hospital Munich, Germany.
| | - Farnaz Rahimi
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, LMU University Hospital Munich, Germany.
| | - Kerstin Schatton
- Heinrich-Heine-University, Medical Faculty, Department of Dermatology, Düsseldorf, Germany.
| | - Frank Meiss
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany;University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
| | - Ralf Gutzmer
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology, Allergology and Phlebology, University Hospital Mühlenkreiskliniken Minden, Minden, Germany.
| | - Claudia Pföhler
- Saarland University Medical School, Department of Dermatology and Skin Cancer Center, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
| | - Patrick Terheyden
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
| | - Bastian Schilling
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
| | - Michael Sachse
- Department of Dermatology, Allergology and Phlebology, Klinikum Bremerhaven Reinkenheide, Germany.
| | - Markus V Heppt
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-7 Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Anca Sindrilaru
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Ulm, Germany.
| | - Ulrike Leiter
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
| | - Anne Zaremba
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Carl M Thielmann
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Selma Ugurel
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Lisa Zimmer
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Eva Hadaschik
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | | | - Dirk Schadendorf
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Partner Site Essen and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | | | - Elisabeth Livingstone
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Klaus G Griewank
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Nardou K, Nicolas M, Kuttler F, Cisarova K, Celik E, Quinodoz M, Riggi N, Michielin O, Rivolta C, Turcatti G, Moulin AP. Identification of New Vulnerabilities in Conjunctival Melanoma Using Image-Based High Content Drug Screening. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14061575. [PMID: 35326726 PMCID: PMC8946509 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14061575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Revised: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Recent evidence suggests that numerous similarities exist between the genomic landscapes of both conjunctival and cutaneous melanoma. Since alterations of several components of the MAP kinases, PI3K/mTOR, and cell cycle pathways have been reported in conjunctival melanoma, we decided to assess the sensitivity of conjunctival melanoma to targeted inhibition mostly of kinase inhibitors. A high content drug screening assay based on automated fluorescence microscopy was performed in three conjunctival melanoma cell lines with different genomic backgrounds with 489 kinase inhibitors and 53 other inhibitors. IC50 and apoptosis induction were respectively assessed for 53 and 48 compounds. The genomic background influenced the response to MAK and PI3K/mTOR inhibition, more specifically cell lines with BRAF V600E mutations were more sensitive to BRAF/MEK inhibition, while CRMM2 bearing the NRASQ61L mutation was more sensitive to PI3k/mTOR inhibition. All cell lines demonstrated sensitivity to cell cycle inhibition, being more pronounced in CRMM2, especially with polo-like inhibitors. Our data also revealed new vulnerabilities to Hsp90 and Src inhibition. This study demonstrates that the genomic background partially influences the response to targeted therapy and uncovers a large panel of potential vulnerabilities in conjunctival melanoma that may expand available options for the management of this tumor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katya Nardou
- Jules-Gonin Eye Hospital, University of Lausanne, 1004 Lausanne, Switzerland; (K.N.); (M.N.)
| | - Michael Nicolas
- Jules-Gonin Eye Hospital, University of Lausanne, 1004 Lausanne, Switzerland; (K.N.); (M.N.)
| | - Fabien Kuttler
- Biomolecular Screening Facility, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland; (F.K.); (G.T.)
| | - Katarina Cisarova
- Medical Genetics Unit, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland;
| | - Elifnaz Celik
- Institute of Molecular and Clinical Ophthalmology Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland; (E.C.); (M.Q.); (C.R.)
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Basel, 4056 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Mathieu Quinodoz
- Institute of Molecular and Clinical Ophthalmology Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland; (E.C.); (M.Q.); (C.R.)
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Basel, 4056 Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Genetics and Genome Biology, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK
| | - Nicolo Riggi
- Experimental Pathology, Institute of Pathology, Lausanne University, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland;
| | - Olivier Michielin
- Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland;
| | - Carlo Rivolta
- Institute of Molecular and Clinical Ophthalmology Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland; (E.C.); (M.Q.); (C.R.)
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Basel, 4056 Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Genetics and Genome Biology, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK
| | - Gerardo Turcatti
- Biomolecular Screening Facility, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland; (F.K.); (G.T.)
| | - Alexandre Pierre Moulin
- Jules-Gonin Eye Hospital, University of Lausanne, 1004 Lausanne, Switzerland; (K.N.); (M.N.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
IGF-1R is a molecular determinant for response to p53 reactivation therapy in conjunctival melanoma. Oncogene 2022; 41:600-611. [PMID: 34785779 DOI: 10.1038/s41388-021-02111-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2021] [Revised: 09/27/2021] [Accepted: 10/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
As the p53 tumor suppressor is rarely mutated in conjunctival melanoma (CM), we investigated its activation as a potential therapeutic strategy. Preventing p53/Mdm2 interaction by Nutlin-3, the prototypical Mdm2 antagonist, or via direct siRNA Mdm2 depletion, increased p53 and inhibited viability in CM cell lines. The sensitivity to Nutlin-3 p53 reactivation with concomitant Mdm2 stabilization was higher than that achieved by siRNA, indicative of effects on alternative Mdm2 targets, identified as the cancer-protective IGF-1R. Nutlin-3 treatment increased the association between IGF-1R and β-arrestin1, the adaptor protein that brings Mdm2 to the IGF-1R, initiating receptor degradation in a ligand-dependent manner. Controlled expression of β-arrestin1 augmented inhibitory Nutlin-3 effects on CM survival through enhanced IGF-1R degradation. Yet, the effect of IGF-1R downregulation on cell proliferation is balanced by β-arrestin1-induced p53 inhibition. As mitomycin (MMC) is a well-established adjuvant treatment for CM, and it triggers p53 activation through genotoxic stress, we evaluated how these alternative p53-targeting strategies alter the cancer-relevant bioactivities of CM. In 2D and 3D in vitro models, Nutlin-3 or MMC alone, or in combination, reduces the overall cell tumor growth ~30%, with double treatment inhibition rate only marginally higher than single-drug regimens. However, histopathological evaluation of the 3D models revealed that Nutlin-3 was the most effective, causing necrotic areas inside spheroids and complete loss of nuclear staining for the proliferative marker Ki67. These findings were further validated in vivo; zebrafish xenografts demonstrate that Nutlin-3 alone has higher efficacy in restraining CM tumor cell growth and preventing metastasis. Combined, these results reveal that β-arrestin1 directs Mdm2 toward different substrates, thus balancing IGF-1R pro-tumorigenic and p53-tumor suppressive signals. This study defines a potent dual-hit strategy: simultaneous control of a tumor-promoter (IGF-1R) and tumor-suppressor (p53), which ultimately mitigates recurrent and metastatic potential, thus opening up targeted therapy to CM.
Collapse
|
8
|
Lally SE, Milman T, Orloff M, Dalvin LA, Eberhart CG, Heaphy CM, Rodriguez FJ, Lin CC, Dockery PW, Shields JA, Shields CL. Mutational Landscape and Outcomes of Conjunctival Melanoma in 101 Patients. Ophthalmology 2022; 129:679-693. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2022.01.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2021] [Revised: 01/12/2022] [Accepted: 01/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
|
9
|
Nahon-Estève S, Bertolotto C, Picard-Gauci A, Gastaud L, Baillif S, Hofman P, Groulier A, Maschi C, Caujolle JP, Lassalle S, Martel A. Small but Challenging Conjunctival Melanoma: New Insights, Paradigms and Future Perspectives. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:5691. [PMID: 34830847 PMCID: PMC8616295 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13225691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Revised: 11/01/2021] [Accepted: 11/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Although its incidence has increased over the last decades, conjunctival melanoma (CM) remains a rare but challenging periocular malignancy. While there is currently no recognized standard of care, "no-touch" surgical excision followed by adjuvant treatments is usually recommended. Despite its small size, managing CM is challenging for clinicians. The first challenge is the high risk of tumour local recurrence that occurs in about one third of the patients. The management of locally advanced CM (≥T2) or multiple recurrences may require mutilating surgeries such as orbital exenteration (OE). The second challenge is the metastatic spread of CM that occurs in about one quarter of patients, regardless of whether complete surgical excision is performed or not. This highlights the infiltrative and highly aggressive behaviour of CM. Recently, attention has been directed towards the use of eye-sparing strategies to avoid OE. Initially, wide conservative surgeries followed by customized brachytherapy or radiotherapy have appeared as viable strategies. Nowadays, new biological insights into CM have revealed similarities with cutaneous melanoma. These new findings have allowed clinicians to reconsider the management of locally advanced CM with "medical" eye-sparing treatment as well as the management of metastatic spread. The aim of this review was to summarize the current and future perspectives of treatment for CM based on recent biological findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sacha Nahon-Estève
- Ophthalmology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Université Côte d’Azur, 06000 Nice, France; (S.B.); (C.M.); (J.-P.C.); (A.M.)
- Department of Biology and Pathologies of Melanocytes, Team1, Equipe Labellisée Ligue 2020 and Equipe Labellisée ARC 2019, Centre Méditerranéen de Médecine Moléculaire, INSERM, 06200 Nice, France;
| | - Corine Bertolotto
- Department of Biology and Pathologies of Melanocytes, Team1, Equipe Labellisée Ligue 2020 and Equipe Labellisée ARC 2019, Centre Méditerranéen de Médecine Moléculaire, INSERM, 06200 Nice, France;
| | - Alexandra Picard-Gauci
- Dermatology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Université Côte d’Azur, 06000 Nice, France;
| | - Lauris Gastaud
- Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Centre, Oncology Department, Université Côte d’Azur, 06000 Nice, France;
| | - Stéphanie Baillif
- Ophthalmology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Université Côte d’Azur, 06000 Nice, France; (S.B.); (C.M.); (J.-P.C.); (A.M.)
| | - Paul Hofman
- FHU OncoAge, Institute for Research on Cancer and Aging, Nice (IRCAN), Université Côte d’Azur, 06000 Nice, France; (P.H.); (S.L.)
- Biobank BB-0033-00025, Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Université Côte d’Azur, 06000 Nice, France
| | - Anaïs Groulier
- Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Université Côte d’Azur, 06000 Nice, France;
| | - Célia Maschi
- Ophthalmology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Université Côte d’Azur, 06000 Nice, France; (S.B.); (C.M.); (J.-P.C.); (A.M.)
| | - Jean-Pierre Caujolle
- Ophthalmology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Université Côte d’Azur, 06000 Nice, France; (S.B.); (C.M.); (J.-P.C.); (A.M.)
| | - Sandra Lassalle
- FHU OncoAge, Institute for Research on Cancer and Aging, Nice (IRCAN), Université Côte d’Azur, 06000 Nice, France; (P.H.); (S.L.)
- Biobank BB-0033-00025, Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Université Côte d’Azur, 06000 Nice, France
| | - Arnaud Martel
- Ophthalmology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Université Côte d’Azur, 06000 Nice, France; (S.B.); (C.M.); (J.-P.C.); (A.M.)
- FHU OncoAge, Institute for Research on Cancer and Aging, Nice (IRCAN), Université Côte d’Azur, 06000 Nice, France; (P.H.); (S.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Histone Deacetylase (HDAC)-1, -2, -4, and -6 in Uveal Melanomas: Associations with Clinicopathological Parameters and Patients' Survival. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13194763. [PMID: 34638249 PMCID: PMC8507547 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13194763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Revised: 09/12/2021] [Accepted: 09/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Histone Deacetylases (HDACs) have been reportedly associated with tumor development and progression in several types of human malignancy, being currently investigated as potential targets of anti-cancer therapy. The aim of this study is to assess the clinical significance and prognostic role of the of HDAC-1, -2, -4, and -6 immunohistochemical expression, in 75 uveal melanoma (UM) cases. HDACs are differentially expressed in UMs, HDAC-2 being the most frequently expressed isoform, whereas cytoplasmic expression of class I HDAC isoforms is also observed. Additionally, HDAC-1 was associated with increased tumor size, HDAC-6 with mitotic index, and HDAC-2 with epithelioid cell morphology and presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, both parameters of adverse prognosis. Moreover, our data support a significant association of HDAC-2 with patients’ improved OS. These findings suggest that HDACs, and especially HDAC-2, may be implicated in the formation and progression of UM. Abstract Background: Uveal melanoma (UM) represents the most common primary intraocular malignancy in adults, exerting high metastatic potential and poor prognosis. Histone deacetylases (HDACs) play a key role in carcinogenesis, and HDAC inhibitors (HDACIs) are currently being explored as anti-cancer agents in clinical settings. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical significance of HDAC-1, -2, -4, and -6 expression in UM. Methods: HDAC-1, -2, -4, and -6 expression was examined immunohistochemically in 75 UM tissue specimens and was correlated with tumors’ clinicopathological characteristics, the presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILS), as well as with our patients’ overall survival (OS). Results: HDAC-2 was the most frequently expressed isoform (66%), whereas we confirmed in addition to the expected nuclear expression the presence of cytoplasmic expression of class I HDAC isoforms, namely HDAC-1 (33%) and HDAC-2 (9.5%). HDAC-4 and -6 expression was cytoplasmic. HDAC-1 nuclear expression was associated with increased tumor size (p = 0.03), HDAC-6 with higher mitotic index (p = 0.03), and nuclear HDAC-2 with epithelioid cell morphology (p = 0.03) and presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (p = 0.04). The association with the remaining parameters including Monosomy 3 was not significant. Moreover, the presence as well as the nuclear expression pattern of HDAC-2 were correlated with patients’ improved OS and remained significant in multivariate survival analysis. Conclusions: These findings provide evidence for a potential role of HDACs and especially HDAC-2 in the biological mechanisms governing UM evolution and progression.
Collapse
|