1
|
Lodde GC, Hassel J, Wulfken LM, Meier F, Mohr P, Kähler K, Hauschild A, Schilling B, Loquai C, Berking C, Hüning S, Eckardt J, Gutzmer R, Reinhardt L, Glutsch V, Nikfarjam U, Erdmann M, Beckmann CL, Stang A, Kowall B, Galetzka W, Roesch A, Ugurel S, Zimmer L, Schadendorf D, Forschner A, Livingstone E. Adjuvant treatment and outcome of stage III melanoma patients: Results of a multicenter real-world German Dermatologic Cooperative Oncology Group (DeCOG) study. Eur J Cancer 2023; 191:112957. [PMID: 37487400 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.112957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2023] [Revised: 06/19/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Clinical trials demonstrated significantly improved recurrence-free survival (RFS) of melanoma patients receiving adjuvant treatment. As data from controlled trials are based on selected populations, we investigated adjuvantly treated stage III melanoma patients under real-world conditions. PATIENTS AND METHODS In a prior multicenter cohort study, stage III-IV melanoma patients were analysed for their choice of adjuvant therapy. In this follow-up study, we examined RFS, overall and melanoma-specific survival (MSS) and response to the subsequent treatment of 589 stage III patients (232 BRAF-mutated) receiving adjuvant PD-1 inhibitors (PD1; n = 479) or targeted therapy (TT; n = 110). RESULTS The median follow-up of the total cohort was 25.7 months. The main reason for premature discontinuation of adjuvant therapy was disease progression in PD1- (28.8%, n = 138/479) and adverse events in TT-treated patients (28.2%, n = 31/110). Among BRAF-mutated patients, RFS at 24 months was 49% (95% CI 40.6-59.0%) for PD1- and 67% (95% CI 58-77%) for TT-treated patients. The risk of recurrence was higher for BRAF-mutated PD1 than TT (hazard ratio 1.99; 95% CI 1.34-2.96; hazard ratio adjusted for age, sex and tumour stage, 2.21; 95% CI 1.48-3.30). Twenty-four months MSS was 87% (95% CI 81.0-94.1) for PD1 and 92% (95% CI 86.6-97.0) for TT. Response to subsequent systemic treatment for unresectable disease was 22% for all PD1- and 16% for TT-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS PD1-treated patients had more and earlier recurrences than TT patients. In BRAF-mutated patients, adjuvant TT might prevent early recurrences more effectively than PD1 treatment. Management of recurrence despite adjuvant treatment is challenging, with low response to current therapeutic options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georg C Lodde
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Northrhine-Westphalia, Germany
| | - Jessica Hassel
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Lena M Wulfken
- Skin Cancer Center Hannover, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Niedersachsen, Germany
| | - Friedegund Meier
- Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Centre Dresden and National Center for Tumor Diseases, Dresden, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU, Dresden, Saxony, Germany
| | - Peter Mohr
- Department of Dermatology, Elbe Kliniken Stade-Buxtehude, Buxtehude, Niedersachsen, Germany
| | - Katharina Kähler
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Kiel, Kiel, Schleswig Holstein, Germany
| | - Axel Hauschild
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Kiel, Kiel, Schleswig Holstein, Germany
| | - Bastian Schilling
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Bavaria, Germany
| | - Carmen Loquai
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Rhineland Palatinate, Germany
| | - Carola Berking
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, CCC-Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Erlangen, Bavaria, Germany
| | - Svea Hüning
- Department of Dermatology, Klinikum Dortmund gGmbH, Dortmund, Northrhine-Westphalia, Germany
| | - Julia Eckardt
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Ralf Gutzmer
- Skin Cancer Center Hannover, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Niedersachsen, Germany; Department of Dermatology, Johannes Wesling Medical Center, Ruhr University Bochum, Minden, Niedersachsen, Germany
| | - Lydia Reinhardt
- Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Centre Dresden and National Center for Tumor Diseases, Dresden, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU, Dresden, Saxony, Germany
| | - Valerie Glutsch
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Bavaria, Germany
| | - Ulrike Nikfarjam
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Rhineland Palatinate, Germany
| | - Michael Erdmann
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, CCC-Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Erlangen, Bavaria, Germany
| | - Catharina L Beckmann
- Department of Computer Science, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Dortmund (FH Dortmund), Dortmund, Northrhine-Westphalia, Germany
| | - Andreas Stang
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Northrhine-Westphalia, Germany
| | - Bernd Kowall
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Northrhine-Westphalia, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Galetzka
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Northrhine-Westphalia, Germany
| | - Alexander Roesch
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Northrhine-Westphalia, Germany; German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Partner Site Essen and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Selma Ugurel
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Northrhine-Westphalia, Germany; German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Partner Site Essen and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Lisa Zimmer
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Northrhine-Westphalia, Germany
| | - Dirk Schadendorf
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Northrhine-Westphalia, Germany; German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Partner Site Essen and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany; NCT-West, Campus Essen and University Alliance Ruhr, Research Center One Health, Essen, Northrhine-Westphalia, Germany
| | - Andrea Forschner
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Elisabeth Livingstone
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Northrhine-Westphalia, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schnabl SM, Garbe C, Breuninger H, Walter V, Aebischer V, Eckardt J, Ghoreschi FC, Häfner HM, Scheu A. Risk analysis of systemic side effects of tumescent local anaesthesia in the surgical treatment of geriatric and multimorbid patients with skin cancer. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2023; 37:65-74. [PMID: 36152007 DOI: 10.1111/jdv.18588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2022] [Accepted: 08/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Due to demographic change and increased UV exposure, the number of dermatosurgical procedures in the elderly is increasing. Data on the occurrence of systemic side effects during and after treatment with tumescent local anaesthesia are limited and do not refer to details such as volume and composition of local anaesthetics or epinephrine additive. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to investigate the risk of systemic side effects in elderly patients undergoing skin tumour surgery with tumescent local anaesthesia. METHODS Investigation of systemic complications in patients (≥75 years) who underwent head and neck skin tumour surgery under tumescent local anaesthesia at the Department of Dermatology, University Medical Centre Tübingen, between October 2018 and March 2020. RESULTS In total 782 patients (479 males, 303 females) with a mean age of 83.3 years (range: 75.1-102.2 years) could be included. A total of 2940 procedures were performed. Patients were assigned to two groups. The old-old group (≥75-84 years) included 491 patients and the oldest-old group (≥85 years) included 291 patients. The total inpatient stay and thus mean follow-up period was 4.9 days (range 1-28 days). 92.0% (719/782) suffered from pre-existing comorbidities. Systemic complications occurred in 10.2% (80/782; old-olds: 8.6%, oldest-olds: 13.1%). Hypertensive crisis (>180/120 mmHg) requiring intervention (6.7%) that occurred intraoperatively or during the inpatient stay was the most frequent systemic complication. Cardiac arrhythmias occurred postoperatively in 0.8% of cases. No life-threatening complications directly related to tumescent local anaesthesia were found. CONCLUSIONS Skin tumour surgery in tumescent local anaesthesia for the elderly is safe, and complications caused by general anaesthesia can be avoided. Systemic complications can occur, but are usually mild, are caused by pre-existing diseases and perioperative excitement, and can be rapidly detected and well treated by monitoring. There is no direct correlation of complications to high-tumescent concentrations or volume quantities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Claus Garbe
- Department of Dermatology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Helmut Breuninger
- Department of Dermatology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Vincent Walter
- Department of Dermatology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | | | - Julia Eckardt
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Franziska Carola Ghoreschi
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Alexander Scheu
- Department of Dermatology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
DeTemple VK, Hassel JC, Sachse MM, Grimmelmann I, Leiter U, Gebhardt C, Eckardt J, Pföhler C, Angela Y, Hübbe H, Gutzmer R. Reinduction of Hedgehog Inhibitors after Checkpoint Inhibition in Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma: A Series of 12 Patients. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:5469. [PMID: 36358887 PMCID: PMC9658899 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14215469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Revised: 11/03/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 08/23/2023] Open
Abstract
For patients with advanced basal cell carcinoma (aBCC) first-line treatment with hedgehog inhibitors (HHIs) and second-line treatment with PD1 inhibitors (PD1i) is available, offering combination and sequencing options. Here, we focus on the efficacy and safety of HHI reinduction after PD1i failure. Retrospective data analysis was performed with 12 patients with aBCC (locally advanced (n = 8)/metastatic (n = 4)). These patients (male:female 6:6, median age 68 years) initially received HHIs, leading to complete/partial response (66%) or stable disease (33%). Median treatment duration was 20.8 (2-64.5) months until discontinuation due to progression (n = 8), adverse events (n = 3), or patient request (n = 1). Subsequent PD1 inhibition (pembrolizumab 42%, cemiplimab 58%) yielded a partial response (8%), stable disease (33%), or progression (59%). Median treatment duration was 4.1 (0.8-16.3) months until discontinuation due to progression (n = 9), adverse events (n = 1), patient request (n = 1), or missing drug approval (n = 1). HHI reinduction resulted in complete/partial response (33%), stable disease (50%), or progression (17%). Median treatment duration was 3.6 (1-29) months. Response duration in the four responding patients was 2-29+ months. Thus, a subgroup of patients with aBCC responded to reinduction of HHI following PD1i failure. Therefore, this sequential treatment represents a feasible treatment option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Viola K. DeTemple
- Department for Dermatology, Johannes Wesling Medical Center Minden, Ruhr University Bochum, 32429 Minden, Germany
| | - Jessica C. Hassel
- Section Dermatooncology, Department of Dermatology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael M. Sachse
- Skin Cancer Center, Clinic for Dermatology, Allergology and Phlebology, Hospital Bremerhaven, 27574 Bremerhaven, Germany
| | - Imke Grimmelmann
- Skin Cancer Center Hannover, Clinic for Dermatology, Allergology and Venerology, Hannover Medical School, 30163 Hannover, Germany
| | - Ulrike Leiter
- Skin Cancer Centre Department of Dermatology, University of Tuebingen, 72074 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Christoffer Gebhardt
- Department for Dermatology and Venerology, University hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), 20251 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Julia Eckardt
- Skin Cancer Centre, Department for Dermatology, Venerology and Allergology, Charité, University Hospital Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Claudia Pföhler
- Skin Cancer Centre, Department for Dermatology, Venerology and Allergology, Saarland University Medical Center and Saarland University Faculty of Medicine, 66421 Homburg, Germany
| | - Yenny Angela
- Department for Dermatology, Johannes Wesling Medical Center Minden, Ruhr University Bochum, 32429 Minden, Germany
| | - Hanna Hübbe
- Section Dermatooncology, Department of Dermatology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ralf Gutzmer
- Department for Dermatology, Johannes Wesling Medical Center Minden, Ruhr University Bochum, 32429 Minden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kamarajah S, Evans R, Nepogodiev D, Hodson J, Bundred J, Gockel I, Gossage J, Isik A, Kidane B, Mahendran H, Negoi I, Okonta K, Sayyed R, van Hillegersberg R, Vohra R, Wijnhoven B, Singh P, Griffiths E, Kamarajah S, Hodson J, Griffiths E, Alderson D, Bundred J, Evans R, Gossage J, Griffiths E, Jefferies B, Kamarajah S, McKay S, Mohamed I, Nepogodiev D, Siaw-Acheampong K, Singh P, van Hillegersberg R, Vohra R, Wanigasooriya K, Whitehouse T, Gjata A, Moreno J, Takeda F, Kidane B, Guevara Castro R, Harustiak T, Bekele A, Kechagias A, Gockel I, Kennedy A, Da Roit A, Bagajevas A, Azagra J, Mahendran H, Mejía-Fernández L, Wijnhoven B, El Kafsi J, Sayyed R, Sousa M, Sampaio A, Negoi I, Blanco R, Wallner B, Schneider P, Hsu P, Isik A, Gananadha S, Wills V, Devadas M, Duong C, Talbot M, Hii M, Jacobs R, Andreollo N, Johnston B, Darling G, Isaza-Restrepo A, Rosero G, Arias-Amézquita F, Raptis D, Gaedcke J, Reim D, Izbicki J, Egberts J, Dikinis S, Kjaer D, Larsen M, Achiam M, Saarnio J, Theodorou D, Liakakos T, Korkolis D, Robb W, Collins C, Murphy T, Reynolds J, Tonini V, Migliore M, Bonavina L, Valmasoni M, Bardini R, Weindelmayer J, Terashima M, White R, Alghunaim E, Elhadi M, Leon-Takahashi A, Medina-Franco H, Lau P, Okonta K, Heisterkamp J, Rosman C, van Hillegersberg R, Beban G, Babor R, Gordon A, Rossaak J, Pal K, Qureshi A, Naqi S, Syed A, Barbosa J, Vicente C, Leite J, Freire J, Casaca R, Costa R, Scurtu R, Mogoanta S, Bolca C, Constantinoiu S, Sekhniaidze D, Bjelović M, So J, Gačevski G, Loureiro C, Pera M, Bianchi A, Moreno Gijón M, Martín Fernández J, Trugeda Carrera M, Vallve-Bernal M, Cítores Pascual M, Elmahi S, Halldestam I, Hedberg J, Mönig S, Gutknecht S, Tez M, Guner A, Tirnaksiz M, Colak E, Sevinç B, Hindmarsh A, Khan I, Khoo D, Byrom R, Gokhale J, Wilkerson P, Jain P, Chan D, Robertson K, Iftikhar S, Skipworth R, Forshaw M, Higgs S, Gossage J, Nijjar R, Viswanath Y, Turner P, Dexter S, Boddy A, Allum W, Oglesby S, Cheong E, Beardsmore D, Vohra R, Maynard N, Berrisford R, Mercer S, Puig S, Melhado R, Kelty C, Underwood T, Dawas K, Lewis W, Al-Bahrani A, Bryce G, Thomas M, Arndt A, Palazzo F, Meguid R, Fergusson J, Beenen E, Mosse C, Salim J, Cheah S, Wright T, Cerdeira M, McQuillan P, Richardson M, Liem H, Spillane J, Yacob M, Albadawi F, Thorpe T, Dingle A, Cabalag C, Loi K, Fisher O, Ward S, Read M, Johnson M, Bassari R, Bui H, Cecconello I, Sallum R, da Rocha J, Lopes L, Tercioti V, Coelho J, Ferrer J, Buduhan G, Tan L, Srinathan S, Shea P, Yeung J, Allison F, Carroll P, Vargas-Barato F, Gonzalez F, Ortega J, Nino-Torres L, Beltrán-García T, Castilla L, Pineda M, Bastidas A, Gómez-Mayorga J, Cortés N, Cetares C, Caceres S, Duarte S, Pazdro A, Snajdauf M, Faltova H, Sevcikova M, Mortensen P, Katballe N, Ingemann T, Morten B, Kruhlikava I, Ainswort A, Stilling N, Eckardt J, Holm J, Thorsteinsson M, Siemsen M, Brandt B, Nega B, Teferra E, Tizazu A, Kauppila J, Koivukangas V, Meriläinen S, Gruetzmann R, Krautz C, Weber G, Golcher H, Emons G, Azizian A, Ebeling M, Niebisch S, Kreuser N, Albanese G, Hesse J, Volovnik L, Boecher U, Reeh M, Triantafyllou S, Schizas D, Michalinos A, Balli E, Mpoura M, Charalabopoulos A, Manatakis D, Balalis D, Bolger J, Baban C, Mastrosimone A, McAnena O, Quinn A, Ó Súilleabháin C, Hennessy M, Ivanovski I, Khizer H, Ravi N, Donlon N, Cervellera M, Vaccari S, Bianchini S, Sartarelli L, Asti E, Bernardi D, Merigliano S, Provenzano L, Scarpa M, Saadeh L, Salmaso B, De Manzoni G, Giacopuzzi S, La Mendola R, De Pasqual C, Tsubosa Y, Niihara M, Irino T, Makuuchi R, Ishii K, Mwachiro M, Fekadu A, Odera A, Mwachiro E, AlShehab D, Ahmed H, Shebani A, Elhadi A, Elnagar F, Elnagar H, Makkai-Popa S, Wong L, Tan Y, Thannimalai S, Ho C, Pang W, Tan J, Basave H, Cortés-González R, Lagarde S, van Lanschot J, Cords C, Jansen W, Martijnse I, Matthijsen R, Bouwense S, Klarenbeek B, Verstegen M, van Workum F, Ruurda J, van der Sluis P, de Maat M, Evenett N, Johnston P, Patel R, MacCormick A, Young M, Smith B, Ekwunife C, Memon A, Shaikh K, Wajid A, Khalil N, Haris M, Mirza Z, Qudus S, Sarwar M, Shehzadi A, Raza A, Jhanzaib M, Farmanali J, Zakir Z, Shakeel O, Nasir I, Khattak S, Baig M, MA N, Ahmed H, Naeem A, Pinho A, da Silva R, Bernardes A, Campos J, Matos H, Braga T, Monteiro C, Ramos P, Cabral F, Gomes M, Martins P, Correia A, Videira J, Ciuce C, Drasovean R, Apostu R, Ciuce C, Paitici S, Racu A, Obleaga C, Beuran M, Stoica B, Ciubotaru C, Negoita V, Cordos I, Birla R, Predescu D, Hoara P, Tomsa R, Shneider V, Agasiev M, Ganjara I, Gunjić D, Veselinović M, Babič T, Chin T, Shabbir A, Kim G, Crnjac A, Samo H, Díez del Val I, Leturio S, Ramón J, Dal Cero M, Rifá S, Rico M, Pagan Pomar A, Martinez Corcoles J, Rodicio Miravalles J, Pais S, Turienzo S, Alvarez L, Campos P, Rendo A, García S, Santos E, Martínez E, Fernández Díaz M, Magadán Álvarez C, Concepción Martín V, Díaz López C, Rosat Rodrigo A, Pérez Sánchez L, Bailón Cuadrado M, Tinoco Carrasco C, Choolani Bhojwani E, Sánchez D, Ahmed M, Dzhendov T, Lindberg F, Rutegård M, Sundbom M, Mickael C, Colucci N, Schnider A, Er S, Kurnaz E, Turkyilmaz S, Turkyilmaz A, Yildirim R, Baki B, Akkapulu N, Karahan O, Damburaci N, Hardwick R, Safranek P, Sujendran V, Bennett J, Afzal Z, Shrotri M, Chan B, Exarchou K, Gilbert T, Amalesh T, Mukherjee D, Mukherjee S, Wiggins T, Kennedy R, McCain S, Harris A, Dobson G, Davies N, Wilson I, Mayo D, Bennett D, Young R, Manby P, Blencowe N, Schiller M, Byrne B, Mitton D, Wong V, Elshaer A, Cowen M, Menon V, Tan L, McLaughlin E, Koshy R, Sharp C, Brewer H, Das N, Cox M, Al Khyatt W, Worku D, Iqbal R, Walls L, McGregor R, Fullarton G, Macdonald A, MacKay C, Craig C, Dwerryhouse S, Hornby S, Jaunoo S, Wadley M, Baker C, Saad M, Kelly M, Davies A, Di Maggio F, McKay S, Mistry P, Singhal R, Tucker O, Kapoulas S, Powell-Brett S, Davis P, Bromley G, Watson L, Verma R, Ward J, Shetty V, Ball C, Pursnani K, Sarela A, Sue Ling H, Mehta S, Hayden J, To N, Palser T, Hunter D, Supramaniam K, Butt Z, Ahmed A, Kumar S, Chaudry A, Moussa O, Kordzadeh A, Lorenzi B, Wilson M, Patil P, Noaman I, Willem J, Bouras G, Evans R, Singh M, Warrilow H, Ahmad A, Tewari N, Yanni F, Couch J, Theophilidou E, Reilly J, Singh P, van Boxel Gijs, Akbari K, Zanotti D, Sgromo B, Sanders G, Wheatley T, Ariyarathenam A, Reece-Smith A, Humphreys L, Choh C, Carter N, Knight B, Pucher P, Athanasiou A, Mohamed I, Tan B, Abdulrahman M, Vickers J, Akhtar K, Chaparala R, Brown R, Alasmar M, Ackroyd R, Patel K, Tamhankar A, Wyman A, Walker R, Grace B, Abbassi N, Slim N, Ioannidi L, Blackshaw G, Havard T, Escofet X, Powell A, Owera A, Rashid F, Jambulingam P, Padickakudi J, Ben-Younes H, Mccormack K, Makey I, Karush M, Seder C, Liptay M, Chmielewski G, Rosato E, Berger A, Zheng R, Okolo E, Singh A, Scott C, Weyant M, Mitchell J. The influence of anastomotic techniques on postoperative anastomotic complications: Results of the Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2022; 164:674-684.e5. [PMID: 35249756 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2022.01.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2021] [Revised: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal anastomotic techniques in esophagectomy to minimize rates of anastomotic leakage and conduit necrosis are not known. The aim of this study was to assess whether the anastomotic technique was associated with anastomotic failure after esophagectomy in the international Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit cohort. METHODS This prospective observational multicenter cohort study included patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer over 9 months during 2018. The primary exposure was the anastomotic technique, classified as handsewn, linear stapled, or circular stapled. The primary outcome was anastomotic failure, namely a composite of anastomotic leakage and conduit necrosis, as defined by the Esophageal Complications Consensus Group. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was used to identify the association between anastomotic techniques and anastomotic failure, after adjustment for confounders. RESULTS Of the 2238 esophagectomies, the anastomosis was handsewn in 27.1%, linear stapled in 21.0%, and circular stapled in 51.9%. Anastomotic techniques differed significantly by the anastomosis sites (P < .001), with the majority of neck anastomoses being handsewn (69.9%), whereas most chest anastomoses were stapled (66.3% circular stapled and 19.3% linear stapled). Rates of anastomotic failure differed significantly among the anastomotic techniques (P < .001), from 19.3% in handsewn anastomoses, to 14.0% in linear stapled anastomoses, and 12.1% in circular stapled anastomoses. This effect remained significant after adjustment for confounding factors on multivariable analysis, with an odds ratio of 0.63 (95% CI, 0.46-0.86; P = .004) for circular stapled versus handsewn anastomosis. However, subgroup analysis by anastomosis site suggested that this effect was predominantly present in neck anastomoses, with anastomotic failure rates of 23.2% versus 14.6% versus 5.9% for handsewn versus linear stapled anastomoses versus circular stapled neck anastomoses, compared with 13.7% versus 13.8% versus 12.2% for chest anastomoses. CONCLUSIONS Handsewn anastomoses appear to be independently associated with higher rates of anastomotic failure compared with stapled anastomoses. However, this effect seems to be largely confined to neck anastomoses, with minimal differences between techniques observed for chest anastomoses. Further research into standardization of anastomotic approach and techniques may further improve outcomes.
Collapse
|
5
|
Eckardt J, Aebischer V, Häfner HM, Kofler L, Pietschke K, Forchhammer S. [An erythematous nodule on the nasal tip]. Dermatologie (Heidelb) 2022; 73:659-662. [PMID: 34918179 DOI: 10.1007/s00105-021-04925-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Eckardt
- Klinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie, Charité Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12200, Berlin, Deutschland. .,Universitäts-Hautklinik Tübingen, Liebermeisterstr. 25, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland.
| | - Valentin Aebischer
- Universitäts-Hautklinik Tübingen, Liebermeisterstr. 25, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - Hans-Martin Häfner
- Universitäts-Hautklinik Tübingen, Liebermeisterstr. 25, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - Lukas Kofler
- Universitäts-Hautklinik Tübingen, Liebermeisterstr. 25, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - Katharina Pietschke
- Universitäts-Hautklinik Tübingen, Liebermeisterstr. 25, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - Stephan Forchhammer
- Universitäts-Hautklinik Tübingen, Liebermeisterstr. 25, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Livingstone E, Forschner A, Hassel JC, Wulfken LM, Meier FE, Mohr P, Kähler KC, Schilling B, Loquai C, Berking C, Hüning S, Eckardt J, Gutzmer R, Reinhardt L, Kowall B, Galetzka W, Hauschild A, Zimmer L, Schadendorf D, Lodde G. Multicenter real-world data of adjuvant treatment and disease outcome of patients with melanoma with high-risk of recurrence. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.9570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
9570 Background: Clinical trials demonstrated a significantly improved recurrence-free survival (RFS) of melanoma patients treated adjuvantly with immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) and targeted therapy (TT). As data from controlled trials are based on selected populations, we investigated melanoma patients with high risk of recurrence who opted for ICI, TT, or no adjuvant treatment (NoTx) under real-world conditions. Methods: In a prior analysis of this multicenter, retrospective cohort study, patients with resected melanoma stage III-IV between 06/2018 and 09/2019 were analyzed for adjuvant therapy choice (Lodde et al., Cancers 2021). In this follow-up study, the treatment course of ICI- and TT-treated patients as well as recurrence characteristics, subsequent management and outcomes also including NoTx patients were examined. Results: 814 patients were included (72 stage IIIA, 266 IIIB, 383 IIIC, 24 IIID, 69 IV; 309 BRAF mut); 533 patients received ICI (66%), 114 TT (14%, 36.9% of all BRAF mutated patients), 167 patients had opted for NoTx (21%). Median treatment duration was 10.2 and 11.7 months for ICI and TT, respectively. ICI was discontinued prematurely in 51% (273/533) and TT in 44% (50/114) of patients. The main reason for discontinuation was progressive disease (PD) in ICI patients (58%, 158/273) and adverse events in TT patients (60%, 33/50). At a median follow-up (FU) of 24.6 months for ICI, 25.3 months for TT, and 21.8 months for NoTx, 48% of ICI (255/533), 35% of TT (40/114), and 45% of NoTx (75/167) patients had developed a recurrence mostly at distant sites (ICI 62%, TT 63%, NoTx 64%). In patients with recurrence, median time from start of adjuvant treatment to 1st recurrence was 6.1 months in ICI and 17.6 months in TT. Median RFS was 32.0 months for ICI (95% CI 25.7-38.3), not reached for TT, and 22.3 months for NoTx (95% CI 15.2-29.4). Among BRAF mut patients with stage III, risk of recurrence was higher for ICI than TT (hazard ratio adjusted for age, sex and tumor stage, 2.31; 95% CI 1.56-3.43). Subsequent systemic treatment for the 1st recurrence was given in 76% (192/253) of ICI, 83% (33/40) of TT, and 53% (40/75) of NoTx patients. Among patients who received the 1st subsequent systemic treatment for metastatic disease, PD was the best response in 67% (82/123) for ICI, 55% (11/20) for TT, and 50% (16/32) for NoTX. Conclusions: After 2 years of FU, recurrences were mostly at distant sites in all groups. ICI had higher discontinuation rates and more and earlier recurrences than TT. BRAF mut melanoma patients treated with ICI had a significantly higher risk of relapse than TT-treated patients. Response to subsequent systemic treatment was low for both ICI and TT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Andrea Forschner
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Jessica Cecile Hassel
- Department of Dermatology and National Center for Tumor Therapy (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lena M. Wulfken
- Skin Cancer Center Hannover, Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Hannover, Germany
| | | | - Peter Mohr
- Elbe Klinikum Buxtehude, Buxtehude, Germany
| | - Katharina C. Kähler
- University Hospital (UKSH), Campus Kiel, Department of Dermatology, Kiel, Germany
| | - Bastian Schilling
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Carmen Loquai
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Carola Berking
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Svea Hüning
- Department of Dermatology, Klinikum Dortmund gGmbH, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Julia Eckardt
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Ralf Gutzmer
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology, Allergology and Phlebology, University Hospital Mühlenkreiskliniken Minden, Minden, Germany
| | - Lydia Reinhardt
- Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Centre Dresden and National Center for Tumor Diseases, Dresden, Germany
| | - Bernd Kowall
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Galetzka
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Axel Hauschild
- University Hospital (UKSH), Campus Kiel, Department of Dermatology, Kiel, Germany
| | - Lisa Zimmer
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Dirk Schadendorf
- Department of Dermatology, University of Essen, Essen, and German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Georg Lodde
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kofler K, Häfner HM, Eckardt J, Scheu A, Ulmer A, Schulz C, Kofler L. Modification of Skin Flaps for Single-Stage Reconstruction of the Nasal Ala Using All-Layer Suture-A Prospective Study. J Cutan Med Surg 2022; 26:465-472. [PMID: 35588084 DOI: 10.1177/12034754221101362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES After local flaps, it may be necessary to reconstruct the contour of the nasal ala. This is possible with a single-stage all-layer shaping suture. In the present study, the functional and aesthetic results after single-stage reconstruction of the nasal ala were prospectively evaluated. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients who underwent surgery for skin tumors of the nose between 06/2019 and 06/2020 who required reconstruction of the nasal ala as part of the defect closure and had an all-layer suture used were prospectively included in the study. A standardized evaluation of aesthetic and functional outcome was conducted by the patient and a physician at discharge as well as 4 weeks later. Patients additionally underwent a follow-up survey 6 months later. RESULTS Thirty-seven patients were included in the study. Four weeks postoperatively, all flaps were found to be fully healed and vital. Aesthetic outcome at 4 weeks was rated as very good or good by physicians in 73% and by patients in 78.4%. Persistent complications due to reduced blood flow were not observed. CONCLUSION The reshaping of the nasal ala as part of the defect reconstruction with an all-layer suture demonstrates very good aesthetic as well as functional results and can be performed in a single-stage procedure. .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katrin Kofler
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Hans-Martin Häfner
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Julia Eckardt
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, Germany.,14903 Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - Alexander Scheu
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Anja Ulmer
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Claudia Schulz
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Lukas Kofler
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lodde GC, Jansen P, Möller I, Sucker A, Hassel JC, Forschner A, Eckardt J, Meier F, Reinhardt L, Kähler KC, Ziemer M, Schlaak M, Rahimi F, Schatton K, Meiss F, Gutzmer R, Pföhler C, Terheyden P, Schilling B, Sachse M, Heppt MV, Sindrilaru A, Leiter U, Zaremba A, Thielmann CM, Ugurel S, Zimmer L, Hadaschik E, Bechrakis NE, Schadendorf D, Westekemper H, Livingstone E, Griewank KG. Genetic characterization of advanced conjunctival melanoma and response to systemic treatment. Eur J Cancer 2022; 166:60-72. [PMID: 35279471 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2021] [Accepted: 01/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Conjunctival melanoma is a rare type of ocular melanoma, which is prone to local recurrence and metastasis and can lead to patient death. Novel therapeutic strategies have revolutionized cutaneous melanoma management. The efficacy of these therapies in conjunctival melanoma, however, has not been evaluated in larger patient cohorts. METHODS In this multi-center retrospective cohort study with additional screening of the ADOREG database, data were collected from 34 patients with metastatic conjunctival melanoma who received targeted therapy (TT) (BRAF ± MEK inhibitors) or immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) (anti-PD-1 ± anti-CTLA4). In 15 cases, tissue was available for targeted next-generation-sequencing (611 genes) and RNA sequencing. Driver mutations, tumor mutational burden, copy number variations and inflammatory/IFNγ gene expression signatures were determined. RESULTS Genetic characterization identified frequent BRAF (46.7%, 7/15), NRAS (26.7%, 4/15), NF1 (20%, 3/15), and TERT promoter (46.7%, 7/15) mutations. UV associated C>T and CC>TT mutations were common. Median follow-up time after start of first TT or ICI therapy was 13.2 months. In 26 patients receiving first-line ICI, estimated one-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 42.0%, PFS and overall survival (OS) 6.2 and 18.0 months, respectively. First-line TT was given to 8 patients, estimated one-year PFS rate was 54.7%, median PFS and OS 12.6 and 29.1 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Our findings support the role of UV irradiation in conjunctival melanoma and the genetic similarity with cutaneous melanoma. Conjunctival melanoma patients with advanced disease benefit from both targeted therapies (BRAF ± MEK inhibitors) and immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georg C Lodde
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Philipp Jansen
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Inga Möller
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Antje Sucker
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Jessica C Hassel
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Andrea Forschner
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
| | - Julia Eckardt
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Friedegund Meier
- Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Centre Dresden and National Center for Tumor Diseases, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität (TU), Dresden, Germany.
| | - Lydia Reinhardt
- Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Centre Dresden and National Center for Tumor Diseases, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität (TU), Dresden, Germany.
| | - Katharina C Kähler
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
| | - Mirjana Ziemer
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
| | - Max Schlaak
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Berlin, Germany; Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, LMU University Hospital Munich, Germany.
| | - Farnaz Rahimi
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, LMU University Hospital Munich, Germany.
| | - Kerstin Schatton
- Heinrich-Heine-University, Medical Faculty, Department of Dermatology, Düsseldorf, Germany.
| | - Frank Meiss
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany;University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
| | - Ralf Gutzmer
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology, Allergology and Phlebology, University Hospital Mühlenkreiskliniken Minden, Minden, Germany.
| | - Claudia Pföhler
- Saarland University Medical School, Department of Dermatology and Skin Cancer Center, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
| | - Patrick Terheyden
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
| | - Bastian Schilling
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
| | - Michael Sachse
- Department of Dermatology, Allergology and Phlebology, Klinikum Bremerhaven Reinkenheide, Germany.
| | - Markus V Heppt
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-7 Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Anca Sindrilaru
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Ulm, Germany.
| | - Ulrike Leiter
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
| | - Anne Zaremba
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Carl M Thielmann
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Selma Ugurel
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Lisa Zimmer
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Eva Hadaschik
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | | | - Dirk Schadendorf
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Partner Site Essen and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | | | - Elisabeth Livingstone
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Klaus G Griewank
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kamarajah SK, Evans RPT, Nepogodiev D, Hodson J, Bundred JR, Gockel I, Gossage JA, Isik A, Kidane B, Mahendran HA, Negoi I, Okonta KE, Sayyed R, van Hillegersberg R, Vohra RS, Wijnhoven BPL, Singh P, Griffiths EA, Kamarajah SK, Hodson J, Griffiths EA, Alderson D, Bundred J, Evans RPT, Gossage J, Griffiths EA, Jefferies B, Kamarajah SK, McKay S, Mohamed I, Nepogodiev D, Siaw-Acheampong K, Singh P, van Hillegersberg R, Vohra R, Wanigasooriya K, Whitehouse T, Gjata A, Moreno JI, Takeda FR, Kidane B, Guevara Castro R, Harustiak T, Bekele A, Kechagias A, Gockel I, Kennedy A, Da Roit A, Bagajevas A, Azagra JS, Mahendran HA, Mejía-Fernández L, Wijnhoven BPL, El Kafsi J, Sayyed RH, Sousa M M, Sampaio AS, Negoi I, Blanco R, Wallner B, Schneider PM, Hsu PK, Isik A, Gananadha S, Wills V, Devadas M, Duong C, Talbot M, Hii MW, Jacobs R, Andreollo NA, Johnston B, Darling G, Isaza-Restrepo A, Rosero G, Arias-Amézquita F, Raptis D, Gaedcke J, Reim D, Izbicki J, Egberts JH, Dikinis S, Kjaer DW, Larsen MH, Achiam MP, Saarnio J, Theodorou D, Liakakos T, Korkolis DP, Robb WB, Collins C, Murphy T, Reynolds J, Tonini V, Migliore M, Bonavina L, Valmasoni M, Bardini R, Weindelmayer J, Terashima M, White RE, Alghunaim E, Elhadi M, Leon-Takahashi AM, Medina-Franco H, Lau PC, Okonta KE, Heisterkamp J, Rosman C, van Hillegersberg R, Beban G, Babor R, Gordon A, Rossaak JI, Pal KMI, Qureshi AU, Naqi SA, Syed AA, Barbosa J, Vicente CS, Leite J, Freire J, Casaca R, Costa RCT, Scurtu RR, Mogoanta SS, Bolca C, Constantinoiu S, Sekhniaidze D, Bjelović M, So JBY, Gačevski G, Loureiro C, Pera M, Bianchi A, Moreno Gijón M, Martín Fernández J, Trugeda Carrera MS, Vallve-Bernal M, Cítores Pascual MA, Elmahi S, Halldestam I, Hedberg J, Mönig S, Gutknecht S, Tez M, Guner A, Tirnaksiz MB, Colak E, Sevinç B, Hindmarsh A, Khan I, Khoo D, Byrom R, Gokhale J, Wilkerson P, Jain P, Chan D, Robertson K, Iftikhar S, Skipworth R, Forshaw M, Higgs S, Gossage J, Nijjar R, Viswanath YKS, Turner P, Dexter S, Boddy A, Allum WH, Oglesby S, Cheong E, Beardsmore D, Vohra R, Maynard N, Berrisford R, Mercer S, Puig S, Melhado R, Kelty C, Underwood T, Dawas K, Lewis W, Bryce G, Thomas M, Arndt AT, Palazzo F, Meguid RA, Fergusson J, Beenen E, Mosse C, Salim J, Cheah S, Wright T, Cerdeira MP, McQuillan P, Richardson M, Liem H, Spillane J, Yacob M, Albadawi F, Thorpe T, Dingle A, Cabalag C, Loi K, Fisher OM, Ward S, Read M, Johnson M, Bassari R, Bui H, Cecconello I, Sallum RAA, da Rocha JRM, Lopes LR, Tercioti Jr V, Coelho JDS, Ferrer JAP, Buduhan G, Tan L, Srinathan S, Shea P, Yeung J, Allison F, Carroll P, Vargas-Barato F, Gonzalez F, Ortega J, Nino-Torres L, Beltrán-García TC, Castilla L, Pineda M, Bastidas A, Gómez-Mayorga J, Cortés N, Cetares C, Caceres S, Duarte S, Pazdro A, Snajdauf M, Faltova H, Sevcikova M, Mortensen PB, Katballe N, Ingemann T, Morten B, Kruhlikava I, Ainswort AP, Stilling NM, Eckardt J, Holm J, Thorsteinsson M, Siemsen M, Brandt B, Nega B, Teferra E, Tizazu A, Kauppila JH, Koivukangas V, Meriläinen S, Gruetzmann R, Krautz C, Weber G, Golcher H, Emons G, Azizian A, Ebeling M, Niebisch S, Kreuser N, Albanese G, Hesse J, Volovnik L, Boecher U, Reeh M, Triantafyllou S, Schizas D, Michalinos A, Balli E, Mpoura M, Charalabopoulos A, Manatakis DK, Balalis D, Bolger J, Baban C, Mastrosimone A, McAnena O, Quinn A, Ó Súilleabháin CB, Hennessy MM, Ivanovski I, Khizer H, Ravi N, Donlon N, Cervellera M, Vaccari S, Bianchini S, Asti E, Bernardi D, Merigliano S, Provenzano L, Scarpa M, Saadeh L, Salmaso B, De Manzoni G, Giacopuzzi S, La Mendola R, De Pasqual CA, Tsubosa Y, Niihara M, Irino T, Makuuchi R, Ishii K K, Mwachiro M, Fekadu A, Odera A, Mwachiro E, AlShehab D, Ahmed HA, Shebani AO, Elhadi A, Elnagar FA, Elnagar HF, Makkai-Popa ST, Wong LF, Tan YR, Thannimalai S, Ho CA, Pang WS, Tan JH, Basave HNL, Cortés-González R, Lagarde SM, van Lanschot JJB, Cords C, Jansen WA, Martijnse I, Matthijsen R, Bouwense S, Klarenbeek B, Verstegen M, van Workum F, Ruurda JP, van der Sluis PC, de Maat M, Evenett N, Johnston P, Patel R, MacCormick A, Smith B, Ekwunife C, Memon AH, Shaikh K, Wajid A, Khalil N, Haris M, Mirza ZU, Qudus SBA, Sarwar MZ, Shehzadi A, Raza A, Jhanzaib MH, Farmanali J, Zakir Z, Shakeel O, Nasir I, Khattak S, Baig M, Noor MA, Ahmed HH, Naeem A, Pinho AC, da Silva R, Bernardes A, Campos JC, Matos H, Braga T, Monteiro C, Ramos P, Cabral F, Gomes MP, Martins PC, Correia AM, Videira JF, Ciuce C, Drasovean R, Apostu R, Ciuce C, Paitici S, Racu AE, Obleaga CV, Beuran M, Stoica B, Ciubotaru C, Negoita V, Cordos I, Birla RD, Predescu D, Hoara PA, Tomsa R, Shneider V, Agasiev M, Ganjara I, Gunjić D, Veselinović M, Babič T, Chin TS, Shabbir A, Kim G, Crnjac A, Samo H, Díez del Val I, Leturio S, Ramón JM, Dal Cero M, Rifá S, Rico M, Pagan Pomar A, Martinez Corcoles JA, Rodicio Miravalles JL, Pais SA, Turienzo SA, Alvarez LS, Campos PV, Rendo AG, García SS, Santos EPG, Martínez ET, Fernández Díaz MJ, Magadán Álvarez C, Concepción Martín V, Díaz López C, Rosat Rodrigo A, Pérez Sánchez LE, Bailón Cuadrado M, Tinoco Carrasco C, Choolani Bhojwani E, Sánchez DP, Ahmed ME, Dzhendov T, Lindberg F, Rutegård M, Sundbom M, Mickael C, Colucci N, Schnider A, Er S, Kurnaz E, Turkyilmaz S, Turkyilmaz A, Yildirim R, Baki BE, Akkapulu N, Karahan O, Damburaci N, Hardwick R, Safranek P, Sujendran V, Bennett J, Afzal Z, Shrotri M, Chan B, Exarchou K, Gilbert T, Amalesh T, Mukherjee D, Mukherjee S, Wiggins TH, Kennedy R, McCain S, Harris A, Dobson G, Davies N, Wilson I, Mayo D, Bennett D, Young R, Manby P, Blencowe N, Schiller M, Byrne B, Mitton D, Wong V, Elshaer A, Cowen M, Menon V, Tan LC, McLaughlin E, Koshy R, Sharp C, Brewer H, Das N, Cox M, Al Khyatt W, Worku D, Iqbal R, Walls L, McGregor R, Fullarton G, Macdonald A, MacKay C, Craig C, Dwerryhouse S, Hornby S, Jaunoo S, Wadley M, Baker C, Saad M, Kelly M, Davies A, Di Maggio F, McKay S, Mistry P, Singhal R, Tucker O, Kapoulas S, Powell-Brett S, Davis P, Bromley G, Watson L, Verma R, Ward J, Shetty V, Ball C, Pursnani K, Sarela A, Sue Ling H, Mehta S, Hayden J, To N, Palser T, Hunter D, Supramaniam K, Butt Z, Ahmed A, Kumar S, Chaudry A, Moussa O, Kordzadeh A, Lorenzi B, Wilson M, Patil P, Noaman I, Bouras G, Evans R, Singh M, Warrilow H, Ahmad A, Tewari N, Yanni F, Couch J, Theophilidou E, Reilly JJ, Singh P, van Boxel G, Akbari K, Zanotti D, Sanders G, Wheatley T, Ariyarathenam A, Reece-Smith A, Humphreys L, Choh C, Carter N, Knight B, Pucher P, Athanasiou A, Mohamed I, Tan B, Abdulrahman M, Vickers J, Akhtar K, Chaparala R, Brown R, Alasmar MMA, Ackroyd R, Patel K, Tamhankar A, Wyman A, Walker R, Grace B, Abbassi N, Slim N, Ioannidi L, Blackshaw G, Havard T, Escofet X, Powell A, Owera A, Rashid F, Jambulingam P, Padickakudi J, Ben-Younes H, Mccormack K, Makey IA, Karush MK, Seder CW, Liptay MJ, Chmielewski G, Rosato EL, Berger AC, Zheng R, Okolo E, Singh A, Scott CD, Weyant MJ, Mitchell JD. Textbook outcome following oesophagectomy for cancer: international cohort study. Br J Surg 2022. [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znac016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Textbook outcome has been proposed as a tool for the assessment of oncological surgical care. However, an international assessment in patients undergoing oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer has not been reported. This study aimed to assess textbook outcome in an international setting.
Methods
Patients undergoing curative resection for oesophageal cancer were identified from the international Oesophagogastric Anastomosis Audit (OGAA) from April 2018 to December 2018. Textbook outcome was defined as the percentage of patients who underwent a complete tumour resection with at least 15 lymph nodes in the resected specimen and an uneventful postoperative course, without hospital readmission. A multivariable binary logistic regression model was used to identify factors independently associated with textbook outcome, and results are presented as odds ratio (OR) and 95 per cent confidence intervals (95 per cent c.i.).
Results
Of 2159 patients with oesophageal cancer, 39.7 per cent achieved a textbook outcome. The outcome parameter ‘no major postoperative complication’ had the greatest negative impact on a textbook outcome for patients with oesophageal cancer, compared to other textbook outcome parameters. Multivariable analysis identified male gender and increasing Charlson comorbidity index with a significantly lower likelihood of textbook outcome. Presence of 24-hour on-call rota for oesophageal surgeons (OR 2.05, 95 per cent c.i. 1.30 to 3.22; P = 0.002) and radiology (OR 1.54, 95 per cent c.i. 1.05 to 2.24; P = 0.027), total minimally invasive oesophagectomies (OR 1.63, 95 per cent c.i. 1.27 to 2.08; P < 0.001), and chest anastomosis above azygous (OR 2.17, 95 per cent c.i. 1.58 to 2.98; P < 0.001) were independently associated with a significantly increased likelihood of textbook outcome.
Conclusion
Textbook outcome is achieved in less than 40 per cent of patients having oesophagectomy for cancer. Improvements in centralization, hospital resources, access to minimal access surgery, and adoption of newer techniques for improving lymph node yield could improve textbook outcome.
Collapse
|
10
|
Kamarajah SK, Evans RPT, Nepogodiev D, Hodson J, Bundred JR, Gockel I, Gossage JA, Isik A, Kidane B, Mahendran HA, Negoi I, Okonta KE, Sayyed R, van Hillegersberg R, Vohra RS, Wijnhoven BPL, Singh P, Griffiths EA, Kamarajah SK, Hodson J, Griffiths EA, Alderson D, Bundred J, Evans RPT, Gossage J, Griffiths EA, Jefferies B, Kamarajah SK, McKay S, Mohamed I, Nepogodiev D, Siaw-Acheampong K, Singh P, van Hillegersberg R, Vohra R, Wanigasooriya K, Whitehouse T, Gjata A, Moreno JI, Takeda FR, Kidane B, Guevara Castro R, Harustiak T, Bekele A, Kechagias A, Gockel I, Kennedy A, Da Roit A, Bagajevas A, Azagra JS, Mahendran HA, Mejía-Fernández L, Wijnhoven BPL, El Kafsi J, Sayyed RH, Sousa M M, Sampaio AS, Negoi I, Blanco R, Wallner B, Schneider PM, Hsu PK, Isik A, Gananadha S, Wills V, Devadas M, Duong C, Talbot M, Hii MW, Jacobs R, Andreollo NA, Johnston B, Darling G, Isaza-Restrepo A, Rosero G, Arias-Amézquita F, Raptis D, Gaedcke J, Reim D, Izbicki J, Egberts JH, Dikinis S, Kjaer DW, Larsen MH, Achiam MP, Saarnio J, Theodorou D, Liakakos T, Korkolis DP, Robb WB, Collins C, Murphy T, Reynolds J, Tonini V, Migliore M, Bonavina L, Valmasoni M, Bardini R, Weindelmayer J, Terashima M, White RE, Alghunaim E, Elhadi M, Leon-Takahashi AM, Medina-Franco H, Lau PC, Okonta KE, Heisterkamp J, Rosman C, van Hillegersberg R, Beban G, Babor R, Gordon A, Rossaak JI, Pal KMI, Qureshi AU, Naqi SA, Syed AA, Barbosa J, Vicente CS, Leite J, Freire J, Casaca R, Costa RCT, Scurtu RR, Mogoanta SS, Bolca C, Constantinoiu S, Sekhniaidze D, Bjelović M, So JBY, Gačevski G, Loureiro C, Pera M, Bianchi A, Moreno Gijón M, Martín Fernández J, Trugeda Carrera MS, Vallve-Bernal M, Cítores Pascual MA, Elmahi S, Halldestam I, Hedberg J, Mönig S, Gutknecht S, Tez M, Guner A, Tirnaksiz MB, Colak E, Sevinç B, Hindmarsh A, Khan I, Khoo D, Byrom R, Gokhale J, Wilkerson P, Jain P, Chan D, Robertson K, Iftikhar S, Skipworth R, Forshaw M, Higgs S, Gossage J, Nijjar R, Viswanath YKS, Turner P, Dexter S, Boddy A, Allum WH, Oglesby S, Cheong E, Beardsmore D, Vohra R, Maynard N, Berrisford R, Mercer S, Puig S, Melhado R, Kelty C, Underwood T, Dawas K, Lewis W, Bryce G, Thomas M, Arndt AT, Palazzo F, Meguid RA, Fergusson J, Beenen E, Mosse C, Salim J, Cheah S, Wright T, Cerdeira MP, McQuillan P, Richardson M, Liem H, Spillane J, Yacob M, Albadawi F, Thorpe T, Dingle A, Cabalag C, Loi K, Fisher OM, Ward S, Read M, Johnson M, Bassari R, Bui H, Cecconello I, Sallum RAA, da Rocha JRM, Lopes LR, Tercioti Jr V, Coelho JDS, Ferrer JAP, Buduhan G, Tan L, Srinathan S, Shea P, Yeung J, Allison F, Carroll P, Vargas-Barato F, Gonzalez F, Ortega J, Nino-Torres L, Beltrán-García TC, Castilla L, Pineda M, Bastidas A, Gómez-Mayorga J, Cortés N, Cetares C, Caceres S, Duarte S, Pazdro A, Snajdauf M, Faltova H, Sevcikova M, Mortensen PB, Katballe N, Ingemann T, Morten B, Kruhlikava I, Ainswort AP, Stilling NM, Eckardt J, Holm J, Thorsteinsson M, Siemsen M, Brandt B, Nega B, Teferra E, Tizazu A, Kauppila JH, Koivukangas V, Meriläinen S, Gruetzmann R, Krautz C, Weber G, Golcher H, Emons G, Azizian A, Ebeling M, Niebisch S, Kreuser N, Albanese G, Hesse J, Volovnik L, Boecher U, Reeh M, Triantafyllou S, Schizas D, Michalinos A, Balli E, Mpoura M, Charalabopoulos A, Manatakis DK, Balalis D, Bolger J, Baban C, Mastrosimone A, McAnena O, Quinn A, Ó Súilleabháin CB, Hennessy MM, Ivanovski I, Khizer H, Ravi N, Donlon N, Cervellera M, Vaccari S, Bianchini S, Asti E, Bernardi D, Merigliano S, Provenzano L, Scarpa M, Saadeh L, Salmaso B, De Manzoni G, Giacopuzzi S, La Mendola R, De Pasqual CA, Tsubosa Y, Niihara M, Irino T, Makuuchi R, Ishii K K, Mwachiro M, Fekadu A, Odera A, Mwachiro E, AlShehab D, Ahmed HA, Shebani AO, Elhadi A, Elnagar FA, Elnagar HF, Makkai-Popa ST, Wong LF, Tan YR, Thannimalai S, Ho CA, Pang WS, Tan JH, Basave HNL, Cortés-González R, Lagarde SM, van Lanschot JJB, Cords C, Jansen WA, Martijnse I, Matthijsen R, Bouwense S, Klarenbeek B, Verstegen M, van Workum F, Ruurda JP, van der Sluis PC, de Maat M, Evenett N, Johnston P, Patel R, MacCormick A, Smith B, Ekwunife C, Memon AH, Shaikh K, Wajid A, Khalil N, Haris M, Mirza ZU, Qudus SBA, Sarwar MZ, Shehzadi A, Raza A, Jhanzaib MH, Farmanali J, Zakir Z, Shakeel O, Nasir I, Khattak S, Baig M, Noor MA, Ahmed HH, Naeem A, Pinho AC, da Silva R, Bernardes A, Campos JC, Matos H, Braga T, Monteiro C, Ramos P, Cabral F, Gomes MP, Martins PC, Correia AM, Videira JF, Ciuce C, Drasovean R, Apostu R, Ciuce C, Paitici S, Racu AE, Obleaga CV, Beuran M, Stoica B, Ciubotaru C, Negoita V, Cordos I, Birla RD, Predescu D, Hoara PA, Tomsa R, Shneider V, Agasiev M, Ganjara I, Gunjić D, Veselinović M, Babič T, Chin TS, Shabbir A, Kim G, Crnjac A, Samo H, Díez del Val I, Leturio S, Ramón JM, Dal Cero M, Rifá S, Rico M, Pagan Pomar A, Martinez Corcoles JA, Rodicio Miravalles JL, Pais SA, Turienzo SA, Alvarez LS, Campos PV, Rendo AG, García SS, Santos EPG, Martínez ET, Fernández Díaz MJ, Magadán Álvarez C, Concepción Martín V, Díaz López C, Rosat Rodrigo A, Pérez Sánchez LE, Bailón Cuadrado M, Tinoco Carrasco C, Choolani Bhojwani E, Sánchez DP, Ahmed ME, Dzhendov T, Lindberg F, Rutegård M, Sundbom M, Mickael C, Colucci N, Schnider A, Er S, Kurnaz E, Turkyilmaz S, Turkyilmaz A, Yildirim R, Baki BE, Akkapulu N, Karahan O, Damburaci N, Hardwick R, Safranek P, Sujendran V, Bennett J, Afzal Z, Shrotri M, Chan B, Exarchou K, Gilbert T, Amalesh T, Mukherjee D, Mukherjee S, Wiggins TH, Kennedy R, McCain S, Harris A, Dobson G, Davies N, Wilson I, Mayo D, Bennett D, Young R, Manby P, Blencowe N, Schiller M, Byrne B, Mitton D, Wong V, Elshaer A, Cowen M, Menon V, Tan LC, McLaughlin E, Koshy R, Sharp C, Brewer H, Das N, Cox M, Al Khyatt W, Worku D, Iqbal R, Walls L, McGregor R, Fullarton G, Macdonald A, MacKay C, Craig C, Dwerryhouse S, Hornby S, Jaunoo S, Wadley M, Baker C, Saad M, Kelly M, Davies A, Di Maggio F, McKay S, Mistry P, Singhal R, Tucker O, Kapoulas S, Powell-Brett S, Davis P, Bromley G, Watson L, Verma R, Ward J, Shetty V, Ball C, Pursnani K, Sarela A, Sue Ling H, Mehta S, Hayden J, To N, Palser T, Hunter D, Supramaniam K, Butt Z, Ahmed A, Kumar S, Chaudry A, Moussa O, Kordzadeh A, Lorenzi B, Wilson M, Patil P, Noaman I, Bouras G, Evans R, Singh M, Warrilow H, Ahmad A, Tewari N, Yanni F, Couch J, Theophilidou E, Reilly JJ, Singh P, van Boxel G, Akbari K, Zanotti D, Sanders G, Wheatley T, Ariyarathenam A, Reece-Smith A, Humphreys L, Choh C, Carter N, Knight B, Pucher P, Athanasiou A, Mohamed I, Tan B, Abdulrahman M, Vickers J, Akhtar K, Chaparala R, Brown R, Alasmar MMA, Ackroyd R, Patel K, Tamhankar A, Wyman A, Walker R, Grace B, Abbassi N, Slim N, Ioannidi L, Blackshaw G, Havard T, Escofet X, Powell A, Owera A, Rashid F, Jambulingam P, Padickakudi J, Ben-Younes H, Mccormack K, Makey IA, Karush MK, Seder CW, Liptay MJ, Chmielewski G, Rosato EL, Berger AC, Zheng R, Okolo E, Singh A, Scott CD, Weyant MJ, Mitchell JD. Textbook outcome following oesophagectomy for cancer: international cohort study. Br J Surg 2022; 109:439-449. [PMID: 35194634 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Revised: 10/08/2021] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Textbook outcome has been proposed as a tool for the assessment of oncological surgical care. However, an international assessment in patients undergoing oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer has not been reported. This study aimed to assess textbook outcome in an international setting. METHODS Patients undergoing curative resection for oesophageal cancer were identified from the international Oesophagogastric Anastomosis Audit (OGAA) from April 2018 to December 2018. Textbook outcome was defined as the percentage of patients who underwent a complete tumour resection with at least 15 lymph nodes in the resected specimen and an uneventful postoperative course, without hospital readmission. A multivariable binary logistic regression model was used to identify factors independently associated with textbook outcome, and results are presented as odds ratio (OR) and 95 per cent confidence intervals (95 per cent c.i.). RESULTS Of 2159 patients with oesophageal cancer, 39.7 per cent achieved a textbook outcome. The outcome parameter 'no major postoperative complication' had the greatest negative impact on a textbook outcome for patients with oesophageal cancer, compared to other textbook outcome parameters. Multivariable analysis identified male gender and increasing Charlson comorbidity index with a significantly lower likelihood of textbook outcome. Presence of 24-hour on-call rota for oesophageal surgeons (OR 2.05, 95 per cent c.i. 1.30 to 3.22; P = 0.002) and radiology (OR 1.54, 95 per cent c.i. 1.05 to 2.24; P = 0.027), total minimally invasive oesophagectomies (OR 1.63, 95 per cent c.i. 1.27 to 2.08; P < 0.001), and chest anastomosis above azygous (OR 2.17, 95 per cent c.i. 1.58 to 2.98; P < 0.001) were independently associated with a significantly increased likelihood of textbook outcome. CONCLUSION Textbook outcome is achieved in less than 40 per cent of patients having oesophagectomy for cancer. Improvements in centralization, hospital resources, access to minimal access surgery, and adoption of newer techniques for improving lymph node yield could improve textbook outcome.
Collapse
|
11
|
Evans RPT, Kamarajah SK, Bundred J, Nepogodiev D, Hodson J, van Hillegersberg R, Gossage J, Vohra R, Griffiths EA, Singh P, Evans RPT, Hodson J, Kamarajah SK, Griffiths EA, Singh P, Alderson D, Bundred J, Evans RPT, Gossage J, Griffiths EA, Jefferies B, Kamarajah SK, McKay S, Mohamed I, Nepogodiev D, Siaw- Acheampong K, Singh P, van Hillegersberg R, Vohra R, Wanigasooriya K, Whitehouse T, Gjata A, Moreno JI, Takeda FR, Kidane B, Guevara Castro R, Harustiak T, Bekele A, Kechagias A, Gockel I, Kennedy A, Da Roit A, Bagajevas A, Azagra JS, Mahendran HA, Mejía-Fernández L, Wijnhoven BPL, El Kafsi J, Sayyed RH, Sousa M, Sampaio AS, Negoi I, Blanco R, Wallner B, Schneider PM, Hsu PK, Isik A, Gananadha S, Wills V, Devadas M, Duong C, Talbot M, Hii MW, Jacobs R, Andreollo NA, Johnston B, Darling G, Isaza-Restrepo A, Rosero G, Arias-Amézquita F, Raptis D, Gaedcke J, Reim D, Izbicki J, Egberts JH, Dikinis S, Kjaer DW, Larsen MH, Achiam MP, Saarnio J, Theodorou D, Liakakos T, Korkolis DP, Robb WB, Collins C, Murphy T, Reynolds J, Tonini V, Migliore M, Bonavina L, Valmasoni M, Bardini R, Weindelmayer J, Terashima M, White RE, Alghunaim E, Elhadi M, Leon-Takahashi AM, Medina-Franco H, Lau PC, Okonta KE, Heisterkamp J, Rosman C, van Hillegersberg R, Beban G, Babor R, Gordon A, Rossaak JI, Pal KMI, Qureshi AU, Naqi SA, Syed AA, Barbosa J, Vicente CS, Leite J, Freire J, Casaca R, Costa RCT, Scurtu RR, Mogoanta SS, Bolca C, Constantinoiu S, Sekhniaidze D, Bjelović M, So JBY, Gačevski G, Loureiro C, Pera M, Bianchi A, Moreno Gijón M, Martín Fernández J, Trugeda Carrera MS, Vallve-Bernal M, Cítores Pascual MA, Elmahi S, Hedberg J, Mönig S, Gutknecht S, Tez M, Guner A, Tirnaksiz TB, Colak E, Sevinç B, Hindmarsh A, Khan I, Khoo D, Byrom R, Gokhale J, Wilkerson P, Jain P, Chan D, Robertson K, Iftikhar S, Skipworth R, Forshaw M, Higgs S, Gossage J, Nijjar R, Viswanath YKS, Turner P, Dexter S, Boddy A, Allum WH, Oglesby S, Cheong E, Beardsmore D, Vohra R, Maynard N, Berrisford R, Mercer S, Puig S, Melhado R, Kelty C, Underwood T, Dawas K, Lewis W, Al-Bahrani A, Bryce G, Thomas M, Arndt AT, Palazzo F, Meguid RA, Fergusson J, Beenen E, Mosse C, Salim J, Cheah S, Wright T, Cerdeira MP, McQuillan P, Richardson M, Liem H, Spillane J, Yacob M, Albadawi F, Thorpe T, Dingle A, Cabalag C, Loi K, Fisher OM, Ward S, Read M, Johnson M, Bassari R, Bui H, Cecconello I, Sallum RAA, da Rocha JRM, Lopes LR, Tercioti V, Coelho JDS, Ferrer JAP, Buduhan G, Tan L, Srinathan S, Shea P, Yeung J, Allison F, Carroll P, Vargas-Barato F, Gonzalez F, Ortega J, Nino-Torres L, Beltrán-García TC, Castilla L, Pineda M, Bastidas A, Gómez-Mayorga J, Cortés N, Cetares C, Caceres S, Duarte S, Pazdro A, Snajdauf M, Faltova H, Sevcikova M, Mortensen PB, Katballe N, Ingemann T, Morten B, Kruhlikava I, Ainswort AP, Stilling NM, Eckardt J, Holm J, Thorsteinsson M, Siemsen M, Brandt B, Nega B, Teferra E, Tizazu A, Kauppila JS, Koivukangas V, Meriläinen S, Gruetzmann R, Krautz C, Weber G, Golcher H, Emons G, Azizian A, Ebeling M, Niebisch S, Kreuser N, Albanese G, Hesse J, Volovnik L, Boecher U, Reeh M, Triantafyllou S, Schizas D, Michalinos A, Baili E, Mpoura M, Charalabopoulos A, Manatakis DK, Balalis D, Bolger J, Baban C, Mastrosimone A, McAnena O, Quinn A, Súilleabháin CBÓ, Hennessy MM, Ivanovski I, Khizer H, Ravi N, Donlon N, Cervellera M, Vaccari S, Bianchini S, Sartarelli L, Asti E, Bernardi D, Merigliano S, Provenzano L, Scarpa M, Saadeh L, Salmaso B, De Manzoni G, Giacopuzzi S, La Mendola R, De Pasqual CA, Tsubosa Y, Niihara M, Irino T, Makuuchi R, Ishii K, Mwachiro M, Fekadu A, Odera A, Mwachiro E, AlShehab D, Ahmed HA, Shebani AO, Elhadi A, Elnagar FA, Elnagar HF, Makkai-Popa ST, Wong LF, Yunrong T, Thanninalai S, Aik HC, Soon PW, Huei TJ, Basave HNL, Cortés-González R, Lagarde SM, van Lanschot JJB, Cords C, Jansen WA, Martijnse I, Matthijsen R, Bouwense S, Klarenbeek B, Verstegen M, van Workum F, Ruurda JP, van der Veen A, van den Berg JW, Evenett N, Johnston P, Patel R, MacCormick A, Young M, Smith B, Ekwunife C, Memon AH, Shaikh K, Wajid A, Khalil N, Haris M, Mirza ZU, Qudus SBA, Sarwar MZ, Shehzadi A, Raza A, Jhanzaib MH, Farmanali J, Zakir Z, Shakeel O, Nasir I, Khattak S, Baig M, Noor MA, Ahmed HH, Naeem A, Pinho AC, da Silva R, Matos H, Braga T, Monteiro C, Ramos P, Cabral F, Gomes MP, Martins PC, Correia AM, Videira JF, Ciuce C, Drasovean R, Apostu R, Ciuce C, Paitici S, Racu AE, Obleaga CV, Beuran M, Stoica B, Ciubotaru C, Negoita V, Cordos I, Birla RD, Predescu D, Hoara PA, Tomsa R, Shneider V, Agasiev M, Ganjara I, Gunjić D, Veselinović M, Babič T, Chin TS, Shabbir A, Kim G, Crnjac A, Samo H, Díez del Val I, Leturio S, Díez del Val I, Leturio S, Ramón JM, Dal Cero M, Rifá S, Rico M, Pagan Pomar A, Martinez Corcoles JA, Rodicio Miravalles JL, Pais SA, Turienzo SA, Alvarez LS, Campos PV, Rendo AG, García SS, Santos EPG, Martínez ET, Fernández Díaz MJ, Magadán Álvarez C, Concepción Martín V, Díaz López C, Rosat Rodrigo A, Pérez Sánchez LE, Bailón Cuadrado M, Tinoco Carrasco C, Choolani Bhojwani E, Sánchez DP, Ahmed ME, Dzhendov T, Lindberg F, Rutegård M, Sundbom M, Mickael C, Colucci N, Schnider A, Er S, Kurnaz E, Turkyilmaz S, Turkyilmaz A, Yildirim R, Baki BE, Akkapulu N, Karahan O, Damburaci N, Hardwick R, Safranek P, Sujendran V, Bennett J, Afzal Z, Shrotri M, Chan B, Exarchou K, Gilbert T, Amalesh T, Mukherjee D, Mukherjee S, Wiggins TH, Kennedy R, McCain S, Harris A, Dobson G, Davies N, Wilson I, Mayo D, Bennett D, Young R, Manby P, Blencowe N, Schiller M, Byrne B, Mitton D, Wong V, Elshaer A, Cowen M, Menon V, Tan LC, McLaughlin E, Koshy R, Sharp C, Brewer H, Das N, Cox M, Al Khyatt W, Worku D, Iqbal R, Walls L, McGregor R, Fullarton G, Macdonald A, MacKay C, Craig C, Dwerryhouse S, Hornby S, Jaunoo S, Wadley M, Baker C, Saad M, Kelly M, Davies A, Di Maggio F, McKay S, Mistry P, Singhal R, Tucker O, Kapoulas S, Powell-Brett S, Davis P, Bromley G, Watson L, Verma R, Ward J, Shetty V, Ball C, Pursnani K, Sarela A, Sue Ling H, Mehta S, Hayden J, To N, Palser T, Hunter D, Supramaniam K, Butt Z, Ahmed A, Kumar S, Chaudry A, Moussa O, Kordzadeh A, Lorenzi B, Wilson M, Patil P, Noaman I, Willem J, Bouras G, Evans R, Singh M, Warrilow H, Ahmad A, Tewari N, Yanni F, Couch J, Theophilidou E, Reilly JJ, Singh P, van Boxel G, Akbari K, Zanotti D, Sgromo B, Sanders G, Wheatley T, Ariyarathenam A, Reece-Smith A, Humphreys L, Choh C, Carter N, Knight B, Pucher P, Athanasiou A, Mohamed I, Tan B, Abdulrahman M, Vickers J, Akhtar K, Chaparala R, Brown R, Alasmar MMA, Ackroyd R, Patel K, Tamhankar A, Wyman A, Walker R, Grace B, Abbassi N, Slim N, Ioannidi L, Blackshaw G, Havard T, Escofet X, Powell A, Owera A, Rashid F, Jambulingam P, Padickakudi J, Ben-Younes H, McCormack K, Makey IA, Karush MK, Seder CW, Liptay MJ, Chmielewski G, Rosato EL, Berger AC, Zheng R, Okolo E, Singh A, Scott CD, Weyant MJ, Mitchell JD. Postoperative outcomes in oesophagectomy with trainee involvement. BJS Open 2021; 5:zrab132. [PMID: 35038327 PMCID: PMC8763367 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The complexity of oesophageal surgery and the significant risk of morbidity necessitates that oesophagectomy is predominantly performed by a consultant surgeon, or a senior trainee under their supervision. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of trainee involvement in oesophagectomy on postoperative outcomes in an international multicentre setting. METHODS Data from the multicentre Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Study Group (OGAA) cohort study were analysed, which comprised prospectively collected data from patients undergoing oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer between April 2018 and December 2018. Procedures were grouped by the level of trainee involvement, and univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to compare patient outcomes across groups. RESULTS Of 2232 oesophagectomies from 137 centres in 41 countries, trainees were involved in 29.1 per cent of them (n = 650), performing only the abdominal phase in 230, only the chest and/or neck phases in 130, and all phases in 315 procedures. For procedures with a chest anastomosis, those with trainee involvement had similar 90-day mortality, complication and reoperation rates to consultant-performed oesophagectomies (P = 0.451, P = 0.318, and P = 0.382, respectively), while anastomotic leak rates were significantly lower in the trainee groups (P = 0.030). Procedures with a neck anastomosis had equivalent complication, anastomotic leak, and reoperation rates (P = 0.150, P = 0.430, and P = 0.632, respectively) in trainee-involved versus consultant-performed oesophagectomies, with significantly lower 90-day mortality in the trainee groups (P = 0.005). CONCLUSION Trainee involvement was not found to be associated with significantly inferior postoperative outcomes for selected patients undergoing oesophagectomy. The results support continued supervised trainee involvement in oesophageal cancer surgery.
Collapse
|
12
|
Achiam MP, Nordsmark M, Ladekarl M, Olsen A, Loft A, Garbyal RS, Larsen MH, Ainsworth AP, Kristensen TS, Dikinis S, Kjær DW, Bæksgaard L, Siemsen M, Nielsen MB, Schlander S, Kramer S, Katballe N, Kruhlikava I, Tabaksblat E, Fisker RV, Mortensen PB, Holtved E, Eckardt J, Detlefsen S, Naujokaite G, Lütken CD. Clinically decisive (dis)agreement in multidisciplinary team assessment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; a prospective, national, multicenter study. Acta Oncol 2021; 60:1091-1099. [PMID: 34313177 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2021.1937308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Decisions regarding tumor staging, operability, resectability, and treatment strategy in patients with esophageal cancer are made at multidisciplinary team (MDT) conferences. We aimed to assess interobserver agreement from four national MDT conferences and whether this would have a clinical impact. METHODS A total of 20 patients with esophageal cancer were included across all four upper gastrointestinal (GI) cancer centers. Fully anonymized patient data were distributed among the MDT conferences which decided on TNM category, resectability, operability, curability, and treatment strategy blinded to each other's decisions. The interobserver agreement was expressed as both the raw observer agreement and with Krippendorff's α values. Finally, a case-by-case evaluation was performed to determine if disagreement would have had a clinical impact. RESULTS A total of 80 MDT evaluations were available for analysis. A moderate to near-perfect observer agreement of 79.2%, 55.8%, and 82.5% for TNM category was observed, respectively. Substantial agreement for resectability and moderate agreement for curability were found. However, an only fair agreement was observed for the operability category. The treatment strategies had a slight agreement which corresponded to disagreement having a clinical impact in 12 patients. CONCLUSIONS Esophageal cancer MDT conferences had an acceptable interobserver agreement on resectability and TM categories; however, the operability assessment had a high level of disagreement. Consequently, the agreement on treatment strategy was reduced with a potential clinical impact. In future MDT conferences, emphasis should be on prioritizing the relevant information being readily available (operability, T & M categories) to minimize the risk of disagreement in the assessments and treatment strategies, and thus, delayed or suboptimal treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Patrick Achiam
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - M. Nordsmark
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - M. Ladekarl
- Department of Oncology, Clinical Cancer Research Center, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - A. Olsen
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - A. Loft
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Rajendra Singh Garbyal
- Department of Pathology, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - M. H. Larsen
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - A. P. Ainsworth
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - T. S. Kristensen
- Department of Radiology, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - S. Dikinis
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - D. W. Kjær
- Department of Surgery, Esophagogastric Section, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - L. Bæksgaard
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - M. Siemsen
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - M. B. Nielsen
- Department of Pathology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - S. Schlander
- Department of Radiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - S. Kramer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET-Centre, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - N. Katballe
- Department of Heart, Lung, and Vascular Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - I. Kruhlikava
- Department of Surgery, Esophagogastric Section, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - E. Tabaksblat
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - R. V. Fisker
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - P. B. Mortensen
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - E. Holtved
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - J. Eckardt
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - S. Detlefsen
- Department of Pathology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - G. Naujokaite
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
- Department of Radiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - C. D. Lütken
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Radiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kamarajah S, Nepogodiev D, Bekele A, Cecconello I, Evans R, Guner A, Gossage J, Harustiak T, Hodson J, Isik A, Kidane B, Leon-Takahashi A, Mahendran H, Negoi I, Okonta K, Rosero G, Sayyed R, Singh P, Takeda F, van Hillegersberg R, Vohra R, White R, Griffiths E, Alderson D, Bundred J, Evans R, Gossage J, Griffiths E, Jefferies B, Kamarajah S, McKay S, Mohamed I, Nepogodiev D, Siaw- Acheampong K, Singh P, van Hillegersberg R, Vohra R, Wanigasooriya K, Whitehouse T, Gjata A, Moreno J, Takeda F, Kidane B, Guevara CR, Harustiak T, Bekele A, Kechagias A, Gockel I, Kennedy A, Da Roit A, Bagajevas A, Azagra J, Mahendran H, Mejía-Fernández L, Wijnhoven B, El Kafsi J, Sayyed R, Sousa M, Sampaio A, Negoi I, Blanco R, Wallner B, Schneider P, Hsu P, Isik A, Gananadha S, Wills V, Devadas M, Duong C, Talbot M, Hii M, Jacobs R, Andreollo N, Johnston B, Darling G, Isaza-Restrepo A, Rosero G, Arias- Amézquita F, Raptis D, Gaedcke J, Reim D, Izbicki J, Egberts J, Dikinis S, Kjaer D, Larsen M, Achiam M, Saarnio J, Theodorou D, Liakakos T, Korkolis D, Robb W, Collins C, Murphy T, Reynolds J, Tonini V, Migliore M, Bonavina L, Valmasoni M, Bardini R, Weindelmayer J, Terashima M, White R, Alghunaim E, Elhadi M, Leon-Takahashi A, Medina-Franco H, Lau P, Okonta K, Heisterkamp J, Rosman C, van Hillegersberg R, Beban G, Babor R, Gordon A, Rossaak J, Pal K, Qureshi A, Naqi S, Syed A, Barbosa J, Vicente C, Leite J, Freire J, Casaca R, Costa R, Scurtu R, Mogoanta S, Bolca C, Constantinoiu S, Sekhniaidze D, Bjelović M, So J, Gačevski G, Loureiro C, Pera M, Bianchi A, Moreno GM, Martín Fernández J, Trugeda Carrera M, Vallve-Bernal M, Cítores Pascual M, Elmahi S, Halldestam I, Hedberg J, Mönig S, Gutknecht S, Tez M, Guner A, Tirnaksiz M, Colak E, Sevinç B, Hindmarsh A, Khan I, Khoo D, Byrom R, Gokhale J, Wilkerson P, Jain P, Chan D, Robertson K, Iftikhar S, Skipworth R, Forshaw M, Higgs S, Gossage J, Nijjar R, Viswanath Y, Turner P, Dexter S, Boddy A, Allum W, Oglesby S, Cheong E, Beardsmore D, Vohra R, Maynard N, Berrisford R, Mercer S, Puig S, Melhado R, Kelty C, Underwood T, Dawas K, Lewis W, Al-Bahrani A, Bryce G, Thomas M, Arndt A, Palazzo F, Meguid R, Fergusson J, Beenen E, Mosse C, Salim J, Cheah S, Wright T, Cerdeira M, McQuillan P, Richardson M, Liem H, Spillane J, Yacob M, Albadawi F, Thorpe T, Dingle A, Cabalag C, Loi K, Fisher O, Ward S, Read M, Johnson M, Bassari R, Bui H, Cecconello I, Sallum R, da Rocha J, Lopes L, Tercioti V, Coelho J, Ferrer J, Buduhan G, Tan L, Srinathan S, Shea P, Yeung J, Allison F, Carroll P, Vargas-Barato F, Gonzalez F, Ortega J, Nino-Torres L, Beltrán-García T, Castilla L, Pineda M, Bastidas A, Gómez-Mayorga J, Cortés N, Cetares C, Caceres S, Duarte S, Pazdro A, Snajdauf M, Faltova H, Sevcikova M, Mortensen P, Katballe N, Ingemann T, Morten B, Kruhlikava I, Ainswort A, Stilling N, Eckardt J, Holm J, Thorsteinsson M, Siemsen M, Brandt B, Nega B, Teferra E, Tizazu A, Kauppila J, Koivukangas V, Meriläinen S, Gruetzmann R, Krautz C, Weber G, Golcher H, Emons G, Azizian A, Ebeling M, Niebisch S, Kreuser N, Albanese G, Hesse J, Volovnik L, Boecher U, Reeh M, Triantafyllou S, Schizas D, Michalinos A, Mpali E, Mpoura M, Charalabopoulos A, Manatakis D, Balalis D, Bolger J, Baban C, Mastrosimone A, McAnena O, Quinn A, Ó Súilleabháin C, Hennessy M, Ivanovski I, Khizer H, Ravi N, Donlon N, Cervellera M, Vaccari S, Bianchini S, Sartarelli L, Asti E, Bernardi D, Merigliano S, Provenzano L, Scarpa M, Saadeh L, Salmaso B, De Manzoni G, Giacopuzzi S, La Mendola R, De Pasqual C, Tsubosa Y, Niihara M, Irino T, Makuuchi R, Ishii K, Mwachiro M, Fekadu A, Odera A, Mwachiro E, AlShehab D, Ahmed H, Shebani A, Elhadi A, Elnagar F, Elnagar H, Makkai-Popa S, Wong L, Tan Y, Thannimalai S, Ho C, Pang W, Tan J, Basave H, Cortés-González R, Lagarde S, van Lanschot J, Cords C, Jansen W, Martijnse I, Matthijsen R, Bouwense S, Klarenbeek B, Verstegen M, van Workum F, Ruurda J, van der Sluis P, de Maat M, Evenett N, Johnston P, Patel R, MacCormick A, Young M, Smith B, Ekwunife C, Memon A, Shaikh K, Wajid A, Khalil N, Haris M, Mirza Z, Qudus S, Sarwar M, Shehzadi A, Raza A, Jhanzaib M, Farmanali J, Zakir Z, Shakeel O, Nasir I, Khattak S, Baig M, Noor M, Ahmed H, Naeem A, Pinho A, da Silva R, Bernardes A, Campos J, Matos H, Braga T, Monteiro C, Ramos P, Cabral F, Gomes M, Martins P, Correia A, Videira J, Ciuce C, Drasovean R, Apostu R, Ciuce C, Paitici S, Racu A, Obleaga C, Beuran M, Stoica B, Ciubotaru C, Negoita V, Cordos I, Birla R, Predescu D, Hoara P, Tomsa R, Shneider V, Agasiev M, Ganjara I, Gunjić D, Veselinović M, Babič T, Chin T, Shabbir A, Kim G, Crnjac A, Samo H, Díez del Val I, Leturio S, Ramón J, Dal Cero M, Rifá S, Rico M, Pagan Pomar A, Martinez Corcoles J, Rodicio Miravalles J, Pais S, Turienzo S, Alvarez L, Campos P, Rendo A, García S, Santos E, Martínez E, Fernández DMJ, Magadán ÁC, Concepción MV, Díaz LC, Rosat RA, Pérez SLE, Bailón CM, Tinoco CC, Choolani Bhojwani E, Sánchez D, Ahmed M, Dzhendov T, Lindberg F, Rutegård M, Sundbom M, Mickael C, Colucci N, Schnider A, Er S, Kurnaz E, Turkyilmaz S, Turkyilmaz A, Yildirim R, Baki B, Akkapulu N, Karahan O, Damburaci N, Hardwick R, Safranek P, Sujendran V, Bennett J, Afzal Z, Shrotri M, Chan B, Exarchou K, Gilbert T, Amalesh T, Mukherjee D, Mukherjee S, Wiggins T, Kennedy R, McCain S, Harris A, Dobson G, Davies N, Wilson I, Mayo D, Bennett D, Young R, Manby P, Blencowe N, Schiller M, Byrne B, Mitton D, Wong V, Elshaer A, Cowen M, Menon V, Tan L, McLaughlin E, Koshy R, Sharp C, Brewer H, Das N, Cox M, Al Khyatt W, Worku D, Iqbal R, Walls L, McGregor R, Fullarton G, Macdonald A, MacKay C, Craig C, Dwerryhouse S, Hornby S, Jaunoo S, Wadley M, Baker C, Saad M, Kelly M, Davies A, Di Maggio F, McKay S, Mistry P, Singhal R, Tucker O, Kapoulas S, Powell-Brett S, Davis P, Bromley G, Watson L, Verma R, Ward J, Shetty V, Ball C, Pursnani K, Sarela A, Sue LH, Mehta S, Hayden J, To N, Palser T, Hunter D, Supramaniam K, Butt Z, Ahmed A, Kumar S, Chaudry A, Moussa O, Kordzadeh A, Lorenzi B, Wilson M, Patil P, Noaman I, Willem J, Bouras G, Evans R, Singh M, Warrilow H, Ahmad A, Tewari N, Yanni F, Couch J, Theophilidou E, Reilly J, Singh P, van Boxel G, Akbari K, Zanotti D, Sgromo B, Sanders G, Wheatley T, Ariyarathenam A, Reece-Smith A, Humphreys L, Choh C, Carter N, Knight B, Pucher P, Athanasiou A, Mohamed I, Tan B, Abdulrahman M, Vickers J, Akhtar K, Chaparala R, Brown R, Alasmar M, Ackroyd R, Patel K, Tamhankar A, Wyman A, Walker R, Grace B, Abbassi N, Slim N, Ioannidi L, Blackshaw G, Havard T, Escofet X, Powell A, Owera A, Rashid F, Jambulingam P, Padickakudi J, Ben-Younes H, Mccormack K, Makey I, Karush M, Seder C, Liptay M, Chmielewski G, Rosato E, Berger A, Zheng R, Okolo E, Singh A, Scott C, Weyant M, Mitchell J. Mortality from esophagectomy for esophageal cancer across low, middle, and high-income countries: An international cohort study. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 47:1481-1488. [PMID: 33451919 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2020] [Accepted: 12/09/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND No evidence currently exists characterising global outcomes following major cancer surgery, including esophageal cancer. Therefore, this study aimed to characterise impact of high income countries (HIC) versus low and middle income countries (LMIC) on the outcomes following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. METHOD This international multi-center prospective study across 137 hospitals in 41 countries included patients who underwent an esophagectomy for esophageal cancer, with 90-day follow-up. The main explanatory variable was country income, defined according to the World Bank Data classification. The primary outcome was 90-day postoperative mortality, and secondary outcomes were composite leaks (anastomotic leak or conduit necrosis) and major complications (Clavien-Dindo Grade III - V). Multivariable generalized estimating equation models were used to produce adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI95%). RESULTS Between April 2018 to December 2018, 2247 patients were included. Patients from HIC were more significantly older, with higher ASA grade, and more advanced tumors. Patients from LMIC had almost three-fold increase in 90-day mortality, compared to HIC (9.4% vs 3.7%, p < 0.001). On adjusted analysis, LMIC were independently associated with higher 90-day mortality (OR: 2.31, CI95%: 1.17-4.55, p = 0.015). However, LMIC were not independently associated with higher rates of anastomotic leaks (OR: 1.06, CI95%: 0.57-1.99, p = 0.9) or major complications (OR: 0.85, CI95%: 0.54-1.32, p = 0.5), compared to HIC. CONCLUSION Resections in LMIC were independently associated with higher 90-day postoperative mortality, likely reflecting a failure to rescue of these patients following esophagectomy, despite similar composite anastomotic leaks and major complication rates to HIC. These findings warrant further research, to identify potential issues and solutions to improve global outcomes following esophagectomy for cancer.
Collapse
|
14
|
Forschner A, Eckardt J, Martus P, Armeanu-Ebinger S, Ossowski S, Bonzheim I, Eigentler T, Amaral TMS, Flatz L, Garbe C, Schroeder C. TMB and BRAF mutation status are independent predictive factors in stage IIIC/D/IV melanoma patients receiving adjuvant PD-1 antibodies. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.9524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
9524 Background: High tumor mutational burden (TMB) is associated with a favorable outcome in metastatic melanoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, data are limited in the adjuvant setting. As BRAF mutated patients have an alternative with targeted adjuvant therapy, it is important to identify predictive factors for relapse and recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients receiving adjuvant PD-1 antibodies. Methods: We systematically evaluated all melanoma patients who started adjuvant PD-1 antibody therapy at our center between March 2018 and September 2019 to identify predictive factors for outcome. The median follow-up time from start of adjuvant anti-PD-1 therapy was 22 months. Tumor and normal tissue of all stage IIIC/D/IV patients and of stage IIIA/B patients with relapse were sequenced using a 700 genes panel. Predictive factors for relapse and RFS were identified using univariate and multivariate logistic and Cox regression analysis. RFS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. TMB high was defined as the top 20 % of the cohort, corresponding to TMB values ≥ 20 Var/Mb. Results: A total of 165 patients were included in this study. According to AJCC 8th the initial tumor stages at the beginning of adjuvant anti-PD-1 therapy were as follows: N = 80 stage IIIA/B (48 %), N = 85 stage IIIC/D/IV (52 %). 72/165 patients (44 %) suffered a relapse, 44/72 (61 %) with loco regional and 28/72 (39 %) with distant metastases. Sequencing results were available from 79 / 85 patients with stage IIIC/D/IV. Here we present the results of this cohort. TMB low (OR 17.46, 95%CI 4.03-75.55; p < 0.0001) or absence of BRAF V600E/K mutation (OR 4.13, 95%CI 1.36-12.53; p = 0.012) were statistically significant, independent predictive factors for relapse. Also, with regard to RFS, BRAF mutation status and TMB were statistically significant and independent predictive factors. In the table below we display results for the combined variables. Patients with BRAF V600E/K mutation and TMB high had the best outcome. Conclusions: We identified TMB high as positive predictive marker in stage IIIC/D/IVmelanoma patients with adjuvant PD-1 antibody therapy. In tumors with BRAF V600E/K mutation and concurrent low TMB, adjuvant targeted therapy with BRAF- and MEK-inhibitors may be an alternative. This is also supported by the data on adjuvant dabrafenib and trametinib, which showed a greater advantage in patients with low TMB, presumably due to less tumor heterogeneity.[Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Forschner
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Julia Eckardt
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Peter Martus
- Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Applied Biometrics, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Sorin Armeanu-Ebinger
- Institute for Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics University Hospital Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Stephan Ossowski
- Institute for Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics University Hospital Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Irina Bonzheim
- Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Thomas Eigentler
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | - Lukas Flatz
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Claus Garbe
- Department of Dermatology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Christopher Schroeder
- Institute for Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics University Hospital Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lodde G, Forschner A, Hassel J, Wulfken LM, Meier F, Mohr P, Kähler K, Schilling B, Loquai C, Berking C, Hüning S, Schatton K, Gebhardt C, Eckardt J, Gutzmer R, Reinhardt L, Glutsch V, Nikfarjam U, Erdmann M, Stang A, Kowall B, Roesch A, Ugurel S, Zimmer L, Schadendorf D, Livingstone E. Factors Influencing the Adjuvant Therapy Decision: Results of a Real-World Multicenter Data Analysis of 904 Melanoma Patients. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:2319. [PMID: 34065995 PMCID: PMC8151445 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13102319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2021] [Revised: 05/04/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Adjuvant treatment of melanoma patients with immune-checkpoint inhibition (ICI) and targeted therapy (TT) significantly improved recurrence-free survival. This study investigates the real-world situation of 904 patients from 13 German skin cancer centers with an indication for adjuvant treatment since the approval of adjuvant ICI and TT. From adjusted log-binomial regression models, we estimated relative risks for associations between various influence factors and treatment decisions (adjuvant therapy yes/no, TT vs. ICI in BRAF mutant patients). Of these patients, 76.9% (95% CI 74-80) opted for a systemic adjuvant treatment. The probability of starting an adjuvant treatment was 26% lower in patients >65 years (RR 0.74, 95% CI 68-80). The most common reasons against adjuvant treatment given by patients were age (29.4%, 95% CI 24-38), and fear of adverse events (21.1%, 95% CI 16-28) and impaired quality of life (11.9%, 95% CI 7-16). Of all BRAF-mutated patients who opted for adjuvant treatment, 52.9% (95% CI 47-59) decided for ICI. Treatment decision for TT or ICI was barely associated with age, gender and tumor stage, but with comorbidities and affiliated center. Shortly after their approval, adjuvant treatments have been well accepted by physicians and patients. Age plays a decisive role in the decision for adjuvant treatment, while pre-existing autoimmune disease and regional differences influence the choice between TT or ICI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georg Lodde
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (G.L.); (A.R.); (S.U.); (L.Z.); (D.S.)
| | - Andrea Forschner
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany; (A.F.); (J.E.)
| | - Jessica Hassel
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany;
| | - Lena M. Wulfken
- Skin Cancer Center Hannover, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany; (L.M.W.); (R.G.)
| | - Friedegund Meier
- Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Centre Dresden and National Center for Tumor Diseases, 01307 Dresden, Germany; (F.M.); (L.R.)
| | - Peter Mohr
- Department of Dermatology, Elbe Kliniken Stade-Buxtehude, 21614 Buxtehude, Germany;
| | - Katharina Kähler
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany;
| | - Bastian Schilling
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Wuerzburg, 97080 Wuerzburg, Germany; (B.S.); (V.G.)
| | - Carmen Loquai
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany; (C.L.); (U.N.)
| | - Carola Berking
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Erlangen, CCC-Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (C.B.); (M.E.)
| | - Svea Hüning
- Department of Dermatology, Klinikum Dortmund gGmbH, 44137 Dortmund, Germany;
| | - Kerstin Schatton
- Department of Dermatology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany;
| | - Christoffer Gebhardt
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Hamburg, 20246 Hamburg, Germany;
| | - Julia Eckardt
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany; (A.F.); (J.E.)
| | - Ralf Gutzmer
- Skin Cancer Center Hannover, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany; (L.M.W.); (R.G.)
| | - Lydia Reinhardt
- Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Centre Dresden and National Center for Tumor Diseases, 01307 Dresden, Germany; (F.M.); (L.R.)
| | - Valerie Glutsch
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Wuerzburg, 97080 Wuerzburg, Germany; (B.S.); (V.G.)
| | - Ulrike Nikfarjam
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany; (C.L.); (U.N.)
| | - Michael Erdmann
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Erlangen, CCC-Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (C.B.); (M.E.)
| | - Andreas Stang
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University Hospital Essen, 45122 Essen, Germany; (A.S.); (B.K.)
| | - Bernd Kowall
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University Hospital Essen, 45122 Essen, Germany; (A.S.); (B.K.)
| | - Alexander Roesch
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (G.L.); (A.R.); (S.U.); (L.Z.); (D.S.)
- German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Partner Site Essen and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Selma Ugurel
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (G.L.); (A.R.); (S.U.); (L.Z.); (D.S.)
| | - Lisa Zimmer
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (G.L.); (A.R.); (S.U.); (L.Z.); (D.S.)
| | - Dirk Schadendorf
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (G.L.); (A.R.); (S.U.); (L.Z.); (D.S.)
- German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Partner Site Essen and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Elisabeth Livingstone
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (G.L.); (A.R.); (S.U.); (L.Z.); (D.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Fergusson J, Beenen E, Mosse C, Salim J, Cheah S, Wright T, Cerdeira MP, McQuillan P, Richardson M, Liem H, Spillane J, Yacob M, Albadawi F, Thorpe T, Dingle A, Cabalag C, Loi K, Fisher OM, Ward S, Read M, Johnson M, Bassari R, Bui H, Cecconello I, Sallum RAA, da Rocha JRM, Lopes LR, Tercioti V, Coelho JDS, Ferrer JAP, Buduhan G, Tan L, Srinathan S, Shea P, Yeung J, Allison F, Carroll P, Vargas-Barato F, Gonzalez F, Ortega J, Nino-Torres L, Beltrán-García TC, Castilla L, Pineda M, Bastidas A, Gómez-Mayorga J, Cortés N, Cetares C, Caceres S, Duarte S, Pazdro A, Snajdauf M, Faltova H, Sevcikova M, Mortensen PB, Katballe N, Ingemann T, Morten B, Kruhlikava I, Ainswort AP, Stilling NM, Eckardt J, Holm J, Thorsteinsson M, Siemsen M, Brandt B, Nega B, Teferra E, Tizazu A, Kauppila JS, Koivukangas V, Meriläinen S, Gruetzmann R, Krautz C, Weber G, Golcher H, Emons G, Azizian A, Ebeling M, Niebisch S, Kreuser N, Albanese G, Hesse J, Volovnik L, Boecher U, Reeh M, Triantafyllou S, Schizas D, Michalinos A, Mpali E, Mpoura M, Charalabopoulos A, Manatakis DK, Balalis D, Bolger J, Baban C, Mastrosimone A, McAnena O, Quinn A, Ó Súilleabháin CB, Hennessy MM, Ivanovski I, Khizer H, Ravi N, Donlon N, Cervellera M, Vaccari S, Bianchini S, Sartarelli L, Asti E, Bernardi D, Merigliano S, Provenzano L, Scarpa M, Saadeh L, Salmaso B, De Manzoni G, Giacopuzzi S, La Mendola R, De Pasqual CA, Tsubosa Y, Niihara M, Irino T, Makuuchi R, Ishii K, Mwachiro M, Fekadu A, Odera A, Mwachiro E, AlShehab D, Ahmed HA, Shebani AO, Elhadi A, Elnagar FA, Elnagar HF, Makkai-Popa ST, Wong LF, Yunrong T, Thanninalai S, Aik HC, Soon PW, Huei TJ, Basave HNL, Cortés-González R, Lagarde SM, van Lanschot JJB, Cords C, Jansen WA, Martijnse I, Matthijsen R, Bouwense S, Klarenbeek B, Verstegen M, van Workum F, Ruurda JP, van der Sluis PC, de Maat M, Evenett N, Johnston P, Patel R, MacCormick A, Young M, Smith B, Ekwunife C, Memon AH, Shaikh K, Wajid A, Khalil N, Haris M, Mirza ZU, Qudus SBA, Sarwar MZ, Shehzadi A, Raza A, Jhanzaib MH, Farmanali J, Zakir Z, Shakeel O, Nasir I, Khattak S, Baig M, Noor MA, Ahmed HH, Naeem A, Pinho AC, da Silva R, Matos H, Braga T, Monteiro C, Ramos P, Cabral F, Gomes MP, Martins PC, Correia AM, Videira JF, Ciuce C, Drasovean R, Apostu R, Ciuce C, Paitici S, Racu AE, Obleaga CV, Beuran M, Stoica B, Ciubotaru C, Negoita V, Cordos I, Birla RD, Predescu D, Hoara PA, Tomsa R, Shneider V, Agasiev M, Ganjara I, Gunjic´ D, Veselinovic´ M, Babič T, Chin TS, Shabbir A, Kim G, Crnjac A, Samo H, Díez del Val I, Leturio S, Díez del Val I, Leturio S, Ramón JM, Dal Cero M, Rifá S, Rico M, Pagan Pomar A, Martinez Corcoles JA, Rodicio Miravalles JL, Pais SA, Turienzo SA, Alvarez LS, Campos PV, Rendo AG, García SS, Santos EPG, Martínez ET, Fernández Díaz MJ, Magadán Álvarez C, Concepción Martín V, Díaz López C, Rosat Rodrigo A, Pérez Sánchez LE, Bailón Cuadrado M, Tinoco Carrasco C, Choolani Bhojwani E, Sánchez DP, Ahmed ME, Dzhendov T, Lindberg F, Rutegård M, Sundbom M, Mickael C, Colucci N, Schnider A, Er S, Kurnaz E, Turkyilmaz S, Turkyilmaz A, Yildirim R, Baki BE, Akkapulu N, Karahan O, Damburaci N, Hardwick R, Safranek P, Sujendran V, Bennett J, Afzal Z, Shrotri M, Chan B, Exarchou K, Gilbert T, Amalesh T, Mukherjee D, Mukherjee S, Wiggins TH, Kennedy R, McCain S, Harris A, Dobson G, Davies N, Wilson I, Mayo D, Bennett D, Young R, Manby P, Blencowe N, Schiller M, Byrne B, Mitton D, Wong V, Elshaer A, Cowen M, Menon V, Tan LC, McLaughlin E, Koshy R, Sharp C, Brewer H, Das N, Cox M, Al Khyatt W, Worku D, Iqbal R, Walls L, McGregor R, Fullarton G, Macdonald A, MacKay C, Craig C, Dwerryhouse S, Hornby S, Jaunoo S, Wadley M, Baker C, Saad M, Kelly M, Davies A, Di Maggio F, McKay S, Mistry P, Singhal R, Tucker O, Kapoulas S, Powell-Brett S, Davis P, Bromley G, Watson L, Verma R, Ward J, Shetty V, Ball C, Pursnani K, Sarela A, Sue Ling H, Mehta S, Hayden J, To N, Palser T, Hunter D, Supramaniam K, Butt Z, Ahmed A, Kumar S, Chaudry A, Moussa O, Kordzadeh A, Lorenzi B, Willem J, Bouras G, Evans R, Singh M, Warrilow H, Ahmad A, Tewari N, Yanni F, Couch J, Theophilidou E, Reilly JJ, Singh P, van Boxel G, Akbari K, Zanotti D, Sgromo B, Sanders G, Wheatley T, Ariyarathenam A, Reece-Smith A, Humphreys L, Choh C, Carter N, Knight B, Pucher P, Athanasiou A, Mohamed I, Tan B, Abdulrahman M, Vickers J, Akhtar K, Chaparala R, Brown R, Alasmar MMA, Ackroyd R, Patel K, Tamhankar A, Wyman A, Walker R, Grace B, Abbassi N, Slim N, Ioannidi L, Blackshaw G, Havard T, Escofet X, Powell A, Owera A, Rashid F, Jambulingam P, Padickakudi J, Ben-Younes H, Mccormack K, Makey IA, Karush MK, Seder CW, Liptay MJ, Chmielewski G, Rosato EL, Berger AC, Zheng R, Okolo E, Singh A, Scott CD, Weyant MJ, Mitchell JD. Comparison of short-term outcomes from the International Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit (OGAA), the Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG), and the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA). BJS Open 2021; 5:zrab010. [PMID: 35179183 PMCID: PMC8140199 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2020] [Accepted: 01/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG) and the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA) have set standards in reporting outcomes after oesophagectomy. Reporting outcomes from selected high-volume centres or centralized national cancer programmes may not, however, be reflective of the true global prevalence of complications. This study aimed to compare complication rates after oesophagectomy from these existing sources with those of an unselected international cohort from the Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit (OGAA). METHODS The OGAA was a prospective multicentre cohort study coordinated by the West Midlands Research Collaborative, and included patients undergoing oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer between April and December 2018, with 90 days of follow-up. RESULTS The OGAA study included 2247 oesophagectomies across 137 hospitals in 41 countries. Comparisons with the ECCG and DUCA found differences in baseline demographics between the three cohorts, including age, ASA grade, and rates of chronic pulmonary disease. The OGAA had the lowest rates of neoadjuvant treatment (OGAA 75.1 per cent, ECCG 78.9 per cent, DUCA 93.5 per cent; P < 0.001). DUCA exhibited the highest rates of minimally invasive surgery (OGAA 57.2 per cent, ECCG 47.9 per cent, DUCA 85.8 per cent; P < 0.001). Overall complication rates were similar in the three cohorts (OGAA 63.6 per cent, ECCG 59.0 per cent, DUCA 62.2 per cent), with no statistically significant difference in Clavien-Dindo grades (P = 0.752). However, a significant difference in 30-day mortality was observed, with DUCA reporting the lowest rate (OGAA 3.2 per cent, ECCG 2.4 per cent, DUCA 1.7 per cent; P = 0.013). CONCLUSION Despite differences in rates of co-morbidities, oncological treatment strategies, and access to minimal-access surgery, overall complication rates were similar in the three cohorts.
Collapse
|
17
|
Eckardt J, Häfner HM, Kofler K, Mroz G, Scheu A, Schulz C, Kofler L. Postoperativer Verlauf von 150 Patienten nach Wächterlymphknotenbiopsie in Tumeszenz‐Lokalanästhesie. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2021; 19:536-544. [PMID: 33861008 DOI: 10.1111/ddg.14351_g] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2020] [Accepted: 11/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Eckardt
- Universitäts-Hautklinik Tübingen, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen
| | | | - Katrin Kofler
- Universitäts-Hautklinik Tübingen, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen
| | - Gabi Mroz
- Universitäts-Hautklinik Tübingen, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen
| | - Alexander Scheu
- Universitäts-Hautklinik Tübingen, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen
| | - Claudia Schulz
- Universitäts-Hautklinik Tübingen, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen
| | - Lukas Kofler
- Universitäts-Hautklinik Tübingen, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Eckardt J, Häfner HM, Kofler K, Mroz G, Scheu A, Schulz C, Kofler L. Post-operative follow-up of 150 patients with sentinel lymph node biopsy under tumescence local anesthesia. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2021; 19:536-543. [PMID: 33565235 DOI: 10.1111/ddg.14351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2020] [Accepted: 11/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is useful for staging of patients with melanoma. Although SLNB is mostly performed under general anesthesia (GA), tumescence local anesthesia (TLA) can also be used. However, less data are available regarding feasibility of SLNB under TLA. Here we present a post-operative follow-up of 150 patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS We prospectively analyzed data from 150 patients with primary cutaneous malignant melanoma. We assessed pain, post-operative complications and patients' satisfaction after SLNB under TLA. RESULTS 32 % of the patients reported post-operative pain within the first 48 h after SLNB. Seroma was the most frequent complication, as 29 seromas after SLNB were observed. Wound infection was observed in 3.3 % of the patients. 98.7 % of the patients were satisfied with SLNB under TLA. CONCLUSIONS SLNB under TLA is a safe and feasible option and should be considered for patients with melanoma. Especially with multimorbid or elderly patients, the risks of GA can be avoided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Eckardt
- Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Hans-Martin Häfner
- Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Katrin Kofler
- Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Gabi Mroz
- Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Alexander Scheu
- Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Claudia Schulz
- Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Lukas Kofler
- Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Eckardt J, Forchhammer S, Hahn M, Scheu A, Welsch K, Kofler L. [A non-healing digital lesion]. Hautarzt 2019; 70:742-744. [PMID: 31342102 DOI: 10.1007/s00105-019-4451-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Eckardt
- Universitäts-Hautklinik Tübingen, Liebermeisterstr. 25, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland.
| | - Stephan Forchhammer
- Universitäts-Hautklinik Tübingen, Liebermeisterstr. 25, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - Matthias Hahn
- Universitäts-Hautklinik Tübingen, Liebermeisterstr. 25, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - Alexander Scheu
- Universitäts-Hautklinik Tübingen, Liebermeisterstr. 25, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - Katharina Welsch
- Universitäts-Hautklinik Tübingen, Liebermeisterstr. 25, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - Lukas Kofler
- Universitäts-Hautklinik Tübingen, Liebermeisterstr. 25, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Bielack S, Flege S, Eckardt J, Sciuk J, Jürgens H, Schober O, Franzius C. High-activity samarium-153-EDTMP therapy followed by autologous peripheral blood stem cell support in unresectable osteosarcoma. Nuklearmedizin 2018. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1625284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
Summary
Purpose: Despite highly efficacious chemotherapy, patients with osteosarcomas still have a poor prognosis if adequate surgical control cannot be obtained. These patients may benefit from therapy with radiolabeled phosphonates. Patients and Methods: Six patients (three male, three female; seven to 41 years) with unresectable primary osteosarcoma (n = 3) or unresectable recurrent sites of osteosarcomas (n = 3) were treated with high-activity of Sm-153-EDTMP (150 MBq/kg BW). In all patients autologous peripheral blood stem cells had been collected before Sm-153-EDTMP therapy. Results: No immediate adverse reactions were observed in the patients. In one patient bone pain increased during the first 48 hrs after therapy. Three patients received pain relief. Autologous peripheral blood stem cell reinfusion was performed on day +12 to +27 in all patients to overcome potentially irreversible damage to the hematopoietic stem cells. In three patient external radiotherapy of the primary tumor site was performed after Sm-153-EDTMP therapy and in two of them polychemotherapy was continued. Thirty-six months later one of these patients is still free of progression. Two further patients are still alive. However, they have developed new metastases. The three patients who had no accompanying external radiotherapy, all died of disease progression five to 20 months after therapy. Conclusion: These preliminary results show that high-dose Sm-153-EDTMP therapy is feasible and warrants further evaluation of efficacy. The combination with external radiation and polychemotherapy seems to be most promising. Although osteosarcoma is believed to be relatively radioresistant, the total focal dose achieved may delay local progression or even achieve permanent local tumor control in patients with surgically inaccessible primary or relapsing tumors.
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is the most common autoimmune blistering disease of the skin requiring skin and serum tests for a precise diagnosis. OBJECTIVES We analysed the sensitivity and specificity of BP-relevant parameters and the value of autoantibody titres during follow-up of BP patients. MATERIALS & METHODS In a retrospective single-centre study, we included 200 consecutive patients with BP and 400 non-BP patients, and evaluated the test results of patients' serum and skin. In addition, we followed patients' autoantibody titres and clinical characteristics. RESULTS BP180-ELISA revealed the highest sensitivity (85.0%; specificity: 93.9%), while BP230-ELISA demonstrated the lowest sensitivity (55.5%; specificity: 92.9%). Direct and indirect immunofluorescence showed comparable results for sensitivity (77.2%/72.7%) and specificity (94.9%/93.7%). The sensitivity for skin histology was 76.3% (specificity: 81.3%). Longitudinal analysis showed significant changes in autoantibody titres. CONCLUSIONS BP diagnostics should include serum tests for BP autoantibodies and skin immunofluorescence. Skin histology is supportive for diagnosis. Autoantibody titres are markers for disease activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Eckardt
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Centre, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| | - Franziska C Eberle
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Centre, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| | - Kamran Ghoreschi
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Centre, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Niens J, Reh F, Çoban B, Cichewicz K, Eckardt J, Liu YT, Hirsh J, Riemensperger TD. Dopamine Modulates Serotonin Innervation in the Drosophila Brain. Front Syst Neurosci 2017; 11:76. [PMID: 29085286 PMCID: PMC5650618 DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2017.00076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2017] [Accepted: 09/28/2017] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Parkinson’s disease (PD) results from a progressive degeneration of the dopaminergic nigrostriatal system leading to a decline in movement control, with resting tremor, rigidity and postural instability. Several aspects of PD can be modeled in the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, including α-synuclein-induced degeneration of dopaminergic neurons, or dopamine (DA) loss by genetic elimination of neural DA synthesis. Defective behaviors in this latter model can be ameliorated by feeding the DA precursor L-DOPA, analogous to the treatment paradigm for PD. Secondary complication from L-DOPA treatment in PD patients are associated with ectopic synthesis of DA in serotonin (5-HT)-releasing neurons, leading to DA/5-HT imbalance. Here we examined the neuro-anatomical adaptations resulting from imbalanced DA/5-HT signaling in Drosophila mutants lacking neural DA. We find that, similar to rodent models of PD, lack of DA leads to increased 5-HT levels and arborizations in specific brain regions. Conversely, increased DA levels by L-DOPA feeding leads to reduced connectivity of 5-HT neurons to their target neurons in the mushroom body (MB). The observed alterations of 5-HT neuron plasticity indicate that loss of DA signaling is not solely responsible for the behavioral disorders observed in Drosophila models of PD, but rather a combination of the latter with alterations of 5-HT circuitry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janna Niens
- Molecular Neurobiology of Behavior, Johann-Friedrich-Blumenbach-Institute for Zoology and Anthropology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Fabienne Reh
- Molecular Neurobiology of Behavior, Johann-Friedrich-Blumenbach-Institute for Zoology and Anthropology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Büşra Çoban
- Molecular Neurobiology of Behavior, Johann-Friedrich-Blumenbach-Institute for Zoology and Anthropology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Karol Cichewicz
- Department of Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States
| | - Julia Eckardt
- Molecular Neurobiology of Behavior, Johann-Friedrich-Blumenbach-Institute for Zoology and Anthropology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Yi-Ting Liu
- Department of Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States
| | - Jay Hirsh
- Department of Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States
| | - Thomas D Riemensperger
- Molecular Neurobiology of Behavior, Johann-Friedrich-Blumenbach-Institute for Zoology and Anthropology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Eckardt J, Licht PB. 033 * ENDOBRONCHIAL ULTRASOUND-GUIDED TRANSBRONCHIAL NEEDLE ASPIRATION IS A HIGHLY SENSITIVE METHOD TO EVALUATE PATIENTS WHO SHOULD NOT UNDERGO PULMONARY METASTASECTOMY. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2014. [DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivu276.33] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
24
|
Eckardt J, Kluth S, Dierks C, Philipp U, Distl O. Population screening for the mutation associated with osteogenesis imperfecta in dachshunds. Vet Rec 2013; 172:364. [PMID: 23315765 DOI: 10.1136/vr.101122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a genetic disorder causing defects in the development of collagen type I. Clinical signs of affected dachshunds include multiple fractures of bones, joint hyperlaxity and dentinogenesis imperfecta. Recently, a recessive mutation in the SERPINH1 gene was detected in dachshunds and enabled the development of a DNA test to identify dachshunds carrying the mutation. The purpose of the present study was to analyse the dachshund breeding population for the frequency of the SERPINH1 mutation among the nine different breed varieties in dachshunds, birth years and countries of origin. We genotyped the OI-associated SERPINH1 mutation in 1352 dachshunds from 12 different European countries including all nine varieties. Genotyping was done using a restriction fragment length polymorphism validated by DNA sequence analysis. The overall frequency of OI carriers was 12.9 per cent. Across all different size varieties, the SERPINH1 mutation was over-represented in wire-haired dachshunds with 17.3 per cent OI carriers. Among the different countries, the proportion of OI carriers was highest in Germany with 20.4 per cent. The test is useful for dachshund breeders to prevent the occurrence of OI-affected dogs and as a diagnostic tool for veterinarians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Eckardt
- Institute for Animal Breeding and Genetics, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Heimgartner S, Eckardt J, Simmen D, Briner HR, Leunig A, Caversaccio MD. Limitations of balloon sinuplasty in frontal sinus surgery. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2011; 268:1463-7. [PMID: 21559809 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-011-1626-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2010] [Accepted: 04/29/2011] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Balloon sinuplasty is a tool that is used to treat selected patients with paranasal sinus pathologies. No studies have investigated the aetiology of failed access to the frontal sinus. The aim of our study was to specify the intraoperative technical failure rate and to analyse the aetiology of the failed access to predict potential technical difficulties before surgery. We retrospectively analysed the charts of patients who underwent balloon sinuplasty from November 2007 to July 2010 at three different ENT-Centres. CT-analysis of the patients with failed access was performed. Of the 104 frontal sinuses, dilation of 12 (12%) sinuses failed. The anatomy of all failed cases revealed variations in the frontal recess (frontoethmoidal-cell, frontal-bulla-cell or agger-nasi-cell) or osteoneogenesis. In one patient, a lymphoma was overlooked during a balloon only procedure. The lymphoma was diagnosed 6 months later with a biopsy during functional endoscopic sinus surgery. In complex anatomical situations of the frontal recess, balloon sinuplasty may be challenging or impossible. In these situations, it is essential to have knowledge of classical functional endoscopic sinus surgery of the frontal recess area. The drawbacks of not including a histopathologic exam should be considered in balloon only procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Heimgartner
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Bern, Switzerland, Freiburgstrasse, 3010 Bern, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Eckardt J, Olsen KE, Jørgensen OD, Licht PB. Minimally invasive diagnosis of sarcoidosis by EBUS when conventional diagnostics fail. Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis 2010; 27:43-48. [PMID: 21086904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial fine-needle aspiration (EBUS) is a minimally invasive method used routinely for mediastinal staging of patients with lung cancer. EBUS has also proved to be a valuable diagnostic tool for patients with different intrathoracic lesions who remain undiagnosed despite bronchoscopy and CT-guided fine-needle aspiration. OBJECTIVE The present study focused on EBUS for diagnosing sarcoidosis. DESIGN During a 3-year period 308 of 601 patients who underwent EBUS at our institution were referred for further diagnostic of a radiologically suspicious lesion in the lung parenchyma (n = 195), enlarged lymph nodes in the mediastinum (n = 89), a suspicious tumor in the mediastinum or pleural disease (n = 24) but no one had a definite histological diagnosis. All charts were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS Of the 308 patients 43 (14%) were eventually diagnosed with sarcoidosis. Thirty-three (77%) were diagnosed with EBUS. In the remaining 10 patients EBUS did not provide adequate tissue samples in 4 (9%) and in 6 patients (14%) EBUS provided adequate tissue but no definite diagnosis. EBUS was significantly better to establish the diagnosis in patients with enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes compared with isolated lung parenchymal involvement (85% vs 63%, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION EBUS is a valuable minimally invasive diagnostic modality to establish the diagnosis of sarcoidosis of unselected patients with undiagnosed intrathoracic lesions after conventional work up--particularly if patients have enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes. This minimally invasive procedure provides a final diagnosis without exposing the patient to the risk of complications from more invasive procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Eckardt
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Eckardt J, Seliger U, Keutel K, Bartels H, Beck N, Jachau K, Kuchheuser W, Grabski R, Szibor R. Tödliche verlaufende Kohlenstoffmonoxidintoxikationen. Rechtsmedizin (Berl) 2010. [DOI: 10.1007/s00194-010-0682-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
28
|
Tap WD, Eilber FR, Rosen G, Eckardt J, Schwartz A, Federman N, Eilber FC. Long-term follow-up (>20 years) for one of the original randomized prospective trials evaluating adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with high-grade operable osteosarcoma. J Clin Oncol 2009. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2009.27.15_suppl.10514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
10514 Background: Neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy is now standard practice for patients who present with localized osteosarcoma. We present the long-term follow-up (>20years) for one of the original prospective randomized trials that compared adjuvant chemotherapy to no treatment in patients with high-grade operable osteosarcoma. Methods: The original study was performed at UCLA from 1981 to 1984. During this time, 59 patients with high-grade, operable, non-metastatic osteosarcoma were randomized to receive adjuvant chemotherapy (MSKCC T-10B protocol)(N=32; 24 men, 8 women, median age 15 yrs) vs. expectant management (N=27; 20 men, 7 women, median age 18 yrs). All patients received one neoadjuvant course of intra-arterial doxorubicin hydrochloride (90mg) and radiation (1750cGy). At a median follow-up of 2 years, there was a statistically significant improvement in both disease-free (55% vs. 20%, p<.01) and overall survival (80% vs. 48%, p<.01) for those who received immediate adjuvant chemotherapy. Upon recurrence, patients in the T-10B arm received salvage chemotherapy with doxorubicin hydrochloride and cisplatin while those in the expectant arm received the T-10B protocol. 27 years after the initiation of the trial, long-term follow-up was obtained on all patients. Results: Median follow-up time for survivors was 24 years. 18 patients in the adjuvant chemotherapy arm died of disease (DOD) while 14 have no evidence of disease (NED). 22 patients in the control arm DOD, 1 died of other causes and 4 have NED. The 5, 10, and 20 year disease specific survival (DSS) for the treatment arm (47%, 43%, 43% respectfully) was significantly better than that of the control arm (30%, 26%, 17% respectfully) (p=0.0254). Conclusions: Early administration of chemotherapy in patients with high-grade operable osteosarcoma provides a significant survival benefit that is maintained with long-term (>20 years) follow-up. These results support the idea that early systemic treatment offers the best opportunity to cure patients with this high-risk malignancy. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W. D. Tap
- UCLA Medical Hematology Oncology, Los Angeles, CA; St. Vincent's Hospital, New York, NY
| | - F. R. Eilber
- UCLA Medical Hematology Oncology, Los Angeles, CA; St. Vincent's Hospital, New York, NY
| | - G. Rosen
- UCLA Medical Hematology Oncology, Los Angeles, CA; St. Vincent's Hospital, New York, NY
| | - J. Eckardt
- UCLA Medical Hematology Oncology, Los Angeles, CA; St. Vincent's Hospital, New York, NY
| | - A. Schwartz
- UCLA Medical Hematology Oncology, Los Angeles, CA; St. Vincent's Hospital, New York, NY
| | - N. Federman
- UCLA Medical Hematology Oncology, Los Angeles, CA; St. Vincent's Hospital, New York, NY
| | - F. C. Eilber
- UCLA Medical Hematology Oncology, Los Angeles, CA; St. Vincent's Hospital, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Eckardt J, Petersen HO, Hakami-Kermani A, Olsen KE, Jorgensen OD, Licht PB. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration of undiagnosed intrathoracic lesions. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2009; 9:232-5. [DOI: 10.1510/icvts.2009.204263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
|
30
|
Leising D, Rehbein D, Eckardt J. The Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP-64) as a Screening Measure for Avoidant Personality Disorder. European Journal of Psychological Assessment 2009. [DOI: 10.1027/1015-5759.25.1.16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
We investigated the usefulness of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP-64) as a screening measure for avoidant personality disorder (AVPD), and for personality disorder (PD) in general. A total of 159 female participants filled out the IIP-64 and then took part in a structured clinical interview for the DSM-IV personality disorders (SCID-II). Interview-based diagnoses of AVPD (N = 21) were predicted with good diagnostic accuracy by a single scale (socially inhibited) of the IIP-64, whereas the presence of any kind of PD (N = 37) was more accurately predicted by the IIP-64 total score. The IIP-64 not only assesses general personality pathology, but may also be used in screening for specific kinds of personality pathology, which have greater clinical relevance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Leising
- Institut für Psychologie, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Germany
| | - Diana Rehbein
- Institut für Psychologie, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Eckardt J, Herzog H, Schäfers KP, Käpplinger S, Schober O. Impact of the lower energy threshold on the NEMA NU2-2001 count-rate performance of a LSO based PET-CT scanner. Nuklearmedizin 2008; 47:210-4. [PMID: 18852928 DOI: 10.3413/nukmed-0148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of the lower energy threshold (LET) on the NEMA NU2-2001 count-rate performance of a LSO-based PET scanner (Siemens PET-CT Biograph Sensation 16). The quantitative measurements were focused on three different aspects: noise equivalent count rate (NEC), scatter fraction, and absolute sensitivity. METHODS According to the NEMA-NU2-2001 protocol count-rate-performance (NEC-2R, scatter fraction) and sensitivity were evaluated performing serial measurements at LETs of 350, 375, 400, 410, 420, 430, 440, and 450 keV (the upper energy threshold was fixed to 650 keV). NEMA protocols were adapted to account for the intrinsic radioactivity of (176)Lu in the LSO crystals. RESULTS Up to a radioactivity concentration of 8 kBq/ml the highest NEC-rates were obtained at an LET of 410 keV, between 8 and 20 kBq/ml at an LET of 420 keV and above 20 kBq/ml at an LET of 430 keV. The overall NEC maximum was 67 kcps at 430 keV (at 28 kBq/ml). The minimum scatter fraction was measured at a radioactivity concentration of approximately 0.5 kBq/ml. The scatter fraction decreased continuously from 45% at an energy threshold of 350 keV to 24% at 450 keV. The maximum sensitivity of 5.8 kcps/MBq, was obtained at an LET of 350 keV and the minimum sensitivity of 4.2 kcps/MBq at an LET of 450 keV. At the LET with the maximum NEC-rate (430 keV) the sensitivity was 4.8 kcps/MBq. CONCLUSION The optimal count-rate performance of the LSO-based PET system was found at LETs between 410 keV and 430 keV depending on the actual radioactivity concentration placed in the scanner. A global maximum in NEC count rate was obtained at an LET of 430 keV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Eckardt
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Eckardt J. Erste Erfahrungen mit dem praktischen Einsatz von Qualitätsindikatoren. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2008. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1085590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
33
|
Maples WJ, Suman V, Croghan GA, Albertini MR, Linette G, Flaherty LE, Eckardt J, Amatruda T, Erlichman CE. Efficacy of PS-341 in combination with paclitaxel (PAC) and carboplatin (CBDCA) for the treatment of metastatic melanoma (MM): A phase II consortium study. J Clin Oncol 2008. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2008.26.15_suppl.20012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
34
|
Bentzion D, Lipatov O, Polyakov I, MacKintosh R, Eckardt J, Breitz H. A phase II study of picoplatin (pico) as second-line therapy for patients (pts) with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) who have resistant or refractory disease or have relapsed within 180 days of completing first-line, platinum (plat)-containing chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 2007. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2007.25.18_suppl.7722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
7722 Background: Pico is a sterically hindered plat analogue designed to overcome plat resistance with improved safety and efficacy. In >600 pts pico had single-agent activity in lung, prostate, ovarian and other malignancies with rare significant nephro-, oto-, or neurotoxicity (∼2% grade 3 and 0% grade 4). In a previous phase 2 study of single agent pico as 2nd line therapy in SCLC, 4 of 48 pts (8%) had a partial response and 21 (44%) stable disease. Median survival was 27.0 (95% CI = 16–35) wks. This multi-center phase 2 trial was designed to confirm the activity of pico as 2nd line monotherapy for plat-resistant SCLC. Methods: Pts with SCLC who either 1) failed or progressed through 1st line plat-containing chemo (refractory disease), or 2) initially responded to 1st line plat-containing chemo and then relapsed/ progressed within 3 months (resistant disease), or 3) initially responded and then relapsed/progressed between 90 to 180 days (sensitive, relapsed 90 to 180 days), had measurable disease and ECOG PS 0–2 were treated with pico, 150 mg/m2 iv over1–2 hrs, q 21 days. Tumor response was assessed q 6 wks. Adverse events (AEs) were graded using the NCI CTCAE. Results: 77 pts received pico (45 refractory, 27 resistant, 5 sensitive). The median number of cycles received was 2 (mean = 2.9). The most frequently reported AEs of any severity were thrombocytopenia (39% of pts), anemia (35%), neutropenia (22%), nausea (20%), emesis (14%) and dyspnea (25%). Neutropenic fever occurred in 1 pt; there were no treatment related deaths. One pt had grade 3 neuropathy; there was no grade 3 or 4 ototoxicity or nephrotoxicity. Median overall survival is 28.1 (95% CI = 26–37) wks. Median progression free survival is 9.3 (95% CI = 7–12) wks. Of 63 pts with at least 1 post-treatment assessment of disease status, 33 (52%) had stable disease. Conclusion: Median survival compares favorably with other therapeutic options and toxicity is reduced in pico treated SCLC pts who have failed prior plat-containing first-line chemo or who have progressed within 180 days of first-line chemo. A phase III trial to confirm these results has been initiated. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D. Bentzion
- Sverdlovsk Regional Oncology Center, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation; Republican Oncology Center, Ufa, Republic of Bashkortostan, Russian Federation; Regional Clinical Hospital #1, Krasnodar, Russian Federation; VA Sierra Nevada Health System, Reno, NV; Center for Cancer Care and Research, St. Louis, MO; Poniard Pharmaceuticals, South San Francisco, CA
| | - O. Lipatov
- Sverdlovsk Regional Oncology Center, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation; Republican Oncology Center, Ufa, Republic of Bashkortostan, Russian Federation; Regional Clinical Hospital #1, Krasnodar, Russian Federation; VA Sierra Nevada Health System, Reno, NV; Center for Cancer Care and Research, St. Louis, MO; Poniard Pharmaceuticals, South San Francisco, CA
| | - I. Polyakov
- Sverdlovsk Regional Oncology Center, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation; Republican Oncology Center, Ufa, Republic of Bashkortostan, Russian Federation; Regional Clinical Hospital #1, Krasnodar, Russian Federation; VA Sierra Nevada Health System, Reno, NV; Center for Cancer Care and Research, St. Louis, MO; Poniard Pharmaceuticals, South San Francisco, CA
| | - R. MacKintosh
- Sverdlovsk Regional Oncology Center, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation; Republican Oncology Center, Ufa, Republic of Bashkortostan, Russian Federation; Regional Clinical Hospital #1, Krasnodar, Russian Federation; VA Sierra Nevada Health System, Reno, NV; Center for Cancer Care and Research, St. Louis, MO; Poniard Pharmaceuticals, South San Francisco, CA
| | - J. Eckardt
- Sverdlovsk Regional Oncology Center, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation; Republican Oncology Center, Ufa, Republic of Bashkortostan, Russian Federation; Regional Clinical Hospital #1, Krasnodar, Russian Federation; VA Sierra Nevada Health System, Reno, NV; Center for Cancer Care and Research, St. Louis, MO; Poniard Pharmaceuticals, South San Francisco, CA
| | - H. Breitz
- Sverdlovsk Regional Oncology Center, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation; Republican Oncology Center, Ufa, Republic of Bashkortostan, Russian Federation; Regional Clinical Hospital #1, Krasnodar, Russian Federation; VA Sierra Nevada Health System, Reno, NV; Center for Cancer Care and Research, St. Louis, MO; Poniard Pharmaceuticals, South San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Dögel D, Eckardt J, Wallesch C, Lutze G, Görtler M. Früher Clopidogrel-Effekt auf Mikroembolissignale bei Patienten mit symptomatischer Arteria-carotis-interna Stenose: Standarddosis versus Ladedosis. Akt Neurol 2006. [DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-953357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
36
|
Ebbinghaus S, Hersh E, Cunningham CC, O'Day S, McDermott D, Stephenson J, Richards DA, Eckardt J, Haider OL, Hammond LA. Phase II study of synthadotin (SYN-D; ILX651) administered daily for 5 consecutive days once every 3 weeks (qdx5q3w) in patients (Pts) with inoperable locally advanced or metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2004. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2004.22.90140.7530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- S. Ebbinghaus
- Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; US Oncology, Mary Crowley Medical Research Center, Dallas, TX; John Wayne Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, CA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; US Oncology, Cancer Centers of the Carolinas, Greenville, SC; US Oncology, Tyler Cancer Center, Tyler, TX; St. John's Mercy Medical Center, St. Louis, MO; ILEX Products, Inc, San Antonio, TX
| | - E. Hersh
- Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; US Oncology, Mary Crowley Medical Research Center, Dallas, TX; John Wayne Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, CA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; US Oncology, Cancer Centers of the Carolinas, Greenville, SC; US Oncology, Tyler Cancer Center, Tyler, TX; St. John's Mercy Medical Center, St. Louis, MO; ILEX Products, Inc, San Antonio, TX
| | - C. C. Cunningham
- Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; US Oncology, Mary Crowley Medical Research Center, Dallas, TX; John Wayne Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, CA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; US Oncology, Cancer Centers of the Carolinas, Greenville, SC; US Oncology, Tyler Cancer Center, Tyler, TX; St. John's Mercy Medical Center, St. Louis, MO; ILEX Products, Inc, San Antonio, TX
| | - S. O'Day
- Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; US Oncology, Mary Crowley Medical Research Center, Dallas, TX; John Wayne Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, CA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; US Oncology, Cancer Centers of the Carolinas, Greenville, SC; US Oncology, Tyler Cancer Center, Tyler, TX; St. John's Mercy Medical Center, St. Louis, MO; ILEX Products, Inc, San Antonio, TX
| | - D. McDermott
- Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; US Oncology, Mary Crowley Medical Research Center, Dallas, TX; John Wayne Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, CA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; US Oncology, Cancer Centers of the Carolinas, Greenville, SC; US Oncology, Tyler Cancer Center, Tyler, TX; St. John's Mercy Medical Center, St. Louis, MO; ILEX Products, Inc, San Antonio, TX
| | - J. Stephenson
- Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; US Oncology, Mary Crowley Medical Research Center, Dallas, TX; John Wayne Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, CA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; US Oncology, Cancer Centers of the Carolinas, Greenville, SC; US Oncology, Tyler Cancer Center, Tyler, TX; St. John's Mercy Medical Center, St. Louis, MO; ILEX Products, Inc, San Antonio, TX
| | - D. A. Richards
- Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; US Oncology, Mary Crowley Medical Research Center, Dallas, TX; John Wayne Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, CA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; US Oncology, Cancer Centers of the Carolinas, Greenville, SC; US Oncology, Tyler Cancer Center, Tyler, TX; St. John's Mercy Medical Center, St. Louis, MO; ILEX Products, Inc, San Antonio, TX
| | - J. Eckardt
- Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; US Oncology, Mary Crowley Medical Research Center, Dallas, TX; John Wayne Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, CA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; US Oncology, Cancer Centers of the Carolinas, Greenville, SC; US Oncology, Tyler Cancer Center, Tyler, TX; St. John's Mercy Medical Center, St. Louis, MO; ILEX Products, Inc, San Antonio, TX
| | - O. L. Haider
- Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; US Oncology, Mary Crowley Medical Research Center, Dallas, TX; John Wayne Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, CA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; US Oncology, Cancer Centers of the Carolinas, Greenville, SC; US Oncology, Tyler Cancer Center, Tyler, TX; St. John's Mercy Medical Center, St. Louis, MO; ILEX Products, Inc, San Antonio, TX
| | - L. A. Hammond
- Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; US Oncology, Mary Crowley Medical Research Center, Dallas, TX; John Wayne Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, CA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; US Oncology, Cancer Centers of the Carolinas, Greenville, SC; US Oncology, Tyler Cancer Center, Tyler, TX; St. John's Mercy Medical Center, St. Louis, MO; ILEX Products, Inc, San Antonio, TX
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Eckardt J, Schäfers KP, Schäfers M, Schober O. Einflüsse der Patientenbewegung auf die Herzvitalitätsdiagnostik mit FDG-PET. ROFO-FORTSCHR RONTG 2004. [DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-827960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
38
|
Abstract
In previously untreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) the combination of docetaxel and gemcitabine is active and well tolerated. In the phase II setting using a 3-week schedule, response rates (RR) ranged from 25 to 50%, and median survival from 11 to 13 months. Preliminary data with weekly and bi-weekly schedules indicate maintained efficacy while reducing the risk of neutropenia. A randomized phase III trial has shown that the combination of docetaxel and gemcitabine is as active as docetaxel plus cisplatin, achieving a 1-year survival rate of 39%, with significantly less neutropenia and gastro-intestinal toxicity. The combination of docetaxel with vinorelbine is equally active and the associated toxicities are manageable. In phase II studies the average response rate is 40%, and in one study using a 2-week schedule the 1-year survival rate was 60%. With this combination neutropenia is the commonest adverse event while clinically significant neuropathy is infrequent. In a randomized phase II trial, docetaxel plus cisplatin was compared to docetaxel plus irinotecan. The non-platinum doublet achieved comparable levels of activity, though with a different toxicity profile (more diarrhea but less nausea and vomiting). The combination of docetaxel with irinotecan and carboplatin has achieved 1-year survival of 55%. All three docetaxel combinations (gemcitabine, vinorelbine, and irinotecan) could provide a valuable alternative to platinum-based chemotherapy and should be further evaluated in phase III setting.
Collapse
|
39
|
Franzius C, Bielack S, Flege S, Eckardt J, Sciuk J, Jürgens H, Schober O. High-activity samarium-153-EDTMP therapy followed by autologous peripheral blood stem cell support in unresectable osteosarcoma. Nuklearmedizin 2001; 40:215-20. [PMID: 11797510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/23/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Despite highly efficacious chemotherapy, patients with osteosarcomas still have a poor prognosis if adequate surgical control cannot be obtained. These patients may benefit from therapy with radiolabeled phosphonates. PATIENTS AND METHODS Six patients (three male, three female; seven to 41 years) with unresectable primary osteosarcoma (n = 3) or unresectable recurrent sites of osteosarcomas (n = 3) were treated with high-activity of Sm-153-EDTMP (150 MBq/kg BW). In all patients autologous peripheral blood stem cells had been collected before Sm-153-EDTMP therapy. RESULTS No immediate adverse reactions were observed in the patients. In one patient bone pain increased during the first 48 hrs after therapy. Three patients received pain relief. Autologous peripheral blood stem cell reinfusion was performed on day +12 to +27 in all patients to overcome potentially irreversible damage to the hematopoietic stem cells. In three patient external radiotherapy of the primary tumor site was performed after Sm-153-EDTMP therapy and in two of them polychemotherapy was continued. Thirty-six months later one of these patients is still free of progression. Two further patients are still alive. However, they have developed new metastases. The three patients who had no accompanying external radiotherapy, all died of disease progression five to 20 months after therapy. CONCLUSION These preliminary results show that high-dose Sm-153-EDTMP therapy is feasible and warrants further evaluation of efficacy. The combination with external radiation and polychemotherapy seems to be most promising. Although osteosarcoma is believed to be relatively radioresistant, the total focal dose achieved may delay local progression or even achieve permanent local tumor control in patients with surgically inaccessible primary or relapsing tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Franzius
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Münster, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Eilber FC, Rosen G, Eckardt J, Forscher C, Nelson SD, Selch M, Dorey F, Eilber FR. Treatment-induced pathologic necrosis: a predictor of local recurrence and survival in patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy for high-grade extremity soft tissue sarcomas. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19:3203-9. [PMID: 11432887 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2001.19.13.3203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 229] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine whether treatment-induced pathologic necrosis correlates with local recurrence and overall survival in patients who receive neoadjuvant therapy for high-grade extremity soft tissue sarcomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS Four hundred ninety-six patients with intermediate- to high-grade extremity soft tissue sarcomas received protocol neoadjuvant therapy. All patients underwent surgical resection after neoadjuvant therapy and had pathologic assessment of tumor necrosis in the resected specimens. RESULTS The 5- and 10-year local recurrence rates for patients with > or = 95% pathologic necrosis were significantly lower (6% and 11%, respectively) than the local recurrence rates for patients with less than 95% pathologic necrosis (17% and 23%, respectively). The 5- and 10-year survival rates for the patients with > or = 95% pathologic necrosis were significantly higher (80% and 71%, respectively) than the survival rates for the patients with less than 95% pathologic necrosis (62% and 55%, respectively). Patients with less than 95% pathologic necrosis were 2.51 times more likely to develop a local recurrence and 1.86 times more likely to die of their disease as compared with patients with > or = 95% pathologic necrosis. The percentage of patients who achieved > or /= 95% pathologic necrosis increased to 48% with the addition of ifosfamide as compared with 13% of the patients in all the other protocols combined. CONCLUSION Treatment-induced pathologic necrosis is an independent predictor of both local recurrence and overall survival in patients who receive neoadjuvant therapy for high-grade extremity soft tissue sarcomas. A complete pathologic response (> or = 95% pathologic necrosis) correlated with a significantly lower rate of local recurrence and improved overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F C Eilber
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of California Los Angeles Sarcoma Research Group, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Georgoulias V, Scagliotti G, Miller V, Eckardt J, Douillard JY, Manegold C. Challenging the platinum combinations: docetaxel (Taxotere) combined with gemcitabine or vinorelbine in non-small cell lung cancer. Semin Oncol 2001; 28:15-21. [PMID: 11284620 DOI: 10.1016/s0093-7754(01)90299-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
The limited single-agent activity of cisplatin, its toxicity profile, and the inconvenience involved in hydrating patients has compelled researchers to investigate other treatments as possible alternative therapies in non-small cell lung cancer. More recently, interest has focused on the potential of nonplatinum combinations. Phase II studies show that the combination of docetaxel (Taxotere; Aventis, Antony, France) and gemcitabine is active in stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer not previously treated by chemotherapy. Response rates of up to 54% and a median survival time of 13 months have been reported. These data are comparable with the achievements of cisplatin-based combinations. A randomized phase II trial of docetaxel plus gemcitabine versus docetaxel plus cisplatin found that the two regimens were equally active in terms of response rate, median, and 1-year survival. However, the combination of docetaxel with gemcitabine produced significantly less neutropenia and nonhematologic toxicities. In combination, from 80% to 100% of the full single-agent gemcitabine and docetaxel doses can safely be administered once every 3 weeks. The combination of docetaxel plus vinorelbine is also active in non-small cell lung cancer and preliminary data suggest that this schedule with prophylactic filgrastim may optimize tolerability and dose intensity. In a phase II study using this approach, a confirmed response rate of 51% was obtained in 35 patients. At 12 months, the predicted median survival is 14 months and the predicted 1-year survival rate is 60%. Excessive lacrimation, fatigue, and onycholysis were cumulative toxicities. However, the incidence of mucositis and neuropathy was low with the combination of docetaxel and vinorelbine. Docetaxel combined with other new agents, particularly gemcitabine, may offer another useful alternative to cisplatin-based chemotherapy in patients with good performance status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Georgoulias
- University General Hospital of Iraklion, Crete, Greece
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Fields-Jones S, Koletsky A, Wilding G, O'Rourke M, O'Rourke T, Eckardt J, Yates B, McGuirt C, Burris HA. Improvements in clinical benefit with vinorelbine in the treatment of hormone-refractory prostate cancer: a phase II trial. Ann Oncol 1999; 10:1307-10. [PMID: 10631457 DOI: 10.1023/a:1008315106697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical activity is difficult to assess by traditional response endpoints in patients with advanced prostate cancer. We used clinical benefit response to assess the activity of vinorelbine (Navelbine) in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Forty-nine men with hormone-refractory prostate cancer received vinorelbine weekly for eight weeks followed by every-other-week dosing. Clinical benefit response was defined by improvement in 1 of the following categories for at least 12 weeks and stable response or better in the other 2: pain index (analgesic consumption and pain intensity), Karnofsky performance status, and tumor status. RESULTS Of 37 evaluable patients, 14 (39%) achieved clinical benefit for a median duration of 6 months (range 3-24 months). Toxicities consisted primarily of brief neutropenia and mild nausea. CONCLUSION These findings indicate that vinorelbine is well tolerated in men with hormone-refractory prostate cancer and produces durable clinical benefit as defined by improvement in pain index and performance status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Fields-Jones
- Cancer Therapy and Research Center, Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
DeVore RF, Johnson DH, Crawford J, Garst J, Dimery IW, Eckardt J, Eckhardt SG, Elfring GL, Schaaf LJ, Hanover CK, Miller LL. Phase II study of irinotecan plus cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17:2710-20. [PMID: 10561345 DOI: 10.1200/jco.1999.17.9.2710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the antitumor efficacy and safety of a combination of irinotecan (CPT-11) and cisplatin in patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A secondary objective was to characterize the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of CPT-11 and its active metabolite, SN-38. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC were treated with repeated 4-week courses comprising CPT-11 (60 mg/m(2)) administered on days 1, 8, and 15, and a single dose of cisplatin (80 mg/m(2)) after CPT-11 administration on day 1. RESULTS Fifty-two patients were enrolled, including 33 men and 19 women. The median age was 61 years (range, 29 to 79 years). Southwest Oncology Group performance status was 0 in 12 patients, 1 in 32 patients, and 2 in eight patients. Eleven and 41 patients had stage IIIB and IV disease, respectively. Objective responses occurred in 28.8% of patients (15 of 52; 95% confidence interval, 16.5% to 41.2%). The median survival duration was 9.9 months (range, 1.6 to 30.8 months). The 1-year survival rate was 37%. Grade 3/4 adverse events consisted primarily of nausea (32. 7% ) or vomiting (13.5%), late-onset diarrhea (17.3%), and neutropenia (46.1%). The study design led to preferential modification of CPT-11 doses, resulting in CPT-11 dose attenuations to < or = 40 mg/m(2) in the majority of patients (31 of 52; 60%), whereas dose reductions of cisplatin were uncommon. CPT-11 pharmacokinetic parameters were comparable to those reported previously in single-agent studies. CONCLUSION CPT-11/cisplatin is an active combination regimen with manageable toxicity in the therapy of stage IIIB/IV NSCLC. Future studies should be designed with schedules and dose modification provisions that avoid unnecessary CPT-11 dose reductions to exploit more directly the therapeutic synergy of these agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R F DeVore
- Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Devore R, Johnson D, Crawford J, Dimery I, Eckardt J, Eckhardt SG. Irinotecan plus cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Oncology (Williston Park) 1998; 12:79-83. [PMID: 9726097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
During the 1980s, platinum-based regimens were yielding response rates typically less than 25%, median survival durations of about 25 weeks, and 1-year survival rates less than 25% in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Currently, results from single institution phase II trials of agents introduced in the 1990s show a doubling of these numbers, and results from multiinstitutional trials are demonstrating response rates ranging from 30% to 40%, median survival durations of 40 weeks, and 1 year survivals of 40%. Single agent irinotecan shows significant activity against NSCLC in preclinical and early phase I/II clinical studies, with activity similar to that for other new agents. Therapeutic synergy is observed in preclinical tumor models when irinotecan and cisplatin are combined, and phase I/II trials of this combination have demonstrated response rates > or = 50%. Herein the author provides an overview of data from phase II trials of irinotecan and focuses on preliminary results of a large US multicenter phase II trial of weekly irinotecan plus monthly cisplatin in 52 patients with advanced NSCLC. A response rate of 28.9% (95% CI, 16.5%-41.2%) and a median survival of 9.9 months were observed in this trial. US studies to design a more optimal irinotecan/cisplatin regimen in the same patient population are ongoing, and early results are encouraging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Devore
- Thoracic Oncology Program, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Villalona-Calero MA, Eckardt J, Burris H, Kraynak M, Fields-Jones S, Bazan C, Lancaster J, Hander T, Goldblum R, Hammond L, Bari A, Drengler R, Rothenberg M, Hadovsky G, Von Hoff DD. A phase I trial of human corticotropin-releasing factor (hCRF) in patients with peritumoral brain edema. Ann Oncol 1998; 9:71-7. [PMID: 9541686 DOI: 10.1023/a:1008251426425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Human corticotropin-releasing factor (hCRF) is an endogenous peptide responsible for the secretion and synthesis of corticosteroids. In animal models of peritumoral brain edema, hCRF has significant anti-edematous action. This effect, which appears to be independent of the release of adrenal steroids, appears mediated by a direct effect on endothelial cells. We conducted a feasibility and phase I study with hCRF given by continuous infusion to patients with brain metastasis. PATIENTS AND METHODS Peritumoral brain edema documented by MRI and the use of either no steroids or stable steroid doses for more than a week were required. MRIs were repeated at completion of infusion and estimations by dual echo-image sequence (Proton density and T2-weighted images) of the amount of peritumoral edema were performed. The study was performed in two stages. In the feasibility part, patients were randomized to receive either 0.66 or 1 microgram/kg/h of hCRF or placebo over 24 hours. The second part was a dose finding study of hCRF over 72 hours at escalating doses. RESULTS Seventeen patients were enrolled; only one was receiving steroids (stable doses) at study entrance; dose-limiting toxicity (hypotension) was observed at 4 micrograms/kg/h x 72 hours in two out of four patients, while zero of five patients treated at 2 micrograms/kg/h developed dose-limiting toxicities. Flushing and hot flashes were also observed. Improvement of neurological symptoms and/or exam were seen in 10 patients. Only small changes were detected by MRI. Improvement in symptoms did not correlate with changes in cortisol levels, and changes in cortisol levels were not correlated with changes in peritumoral edema. CONCLUSIONS hCRF is well tolerated in doses up to 2 micrograms/kg/h by continuous infusion x 72 hours. Hypotension limits administration of higher doses. The observation of clinical benefit in the absence of corticosteroids suggests hCRF may be an alternative to steroids for the treatment of patients with peritumoral brain edema. Further exploration of this agent in efficacy studies is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M A Villalona-Calero
- Institute for Drug Development, Cancer Therapy and Research Center, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Goy BW, Lee SP, Eilber F, Dorey F, Eckardt J, Fu YS, Juillard GJ, Selch MT. The role of adjuvant radiotherapy in the treatment of resectable desmoid tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1997; 39:659-65. [PMID: 9336146 DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(97)00334-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 110] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Desmoid tumors have a high propensity for local recurrence with surgical resection. There are many reports describing good responses of desmoid tumors to irradiation, but none have clearly established the indications for adjuvant radiotherapy in treating resectable desmoid tumors. METHODS AND MATERIALS A retrospective analysis was performed on 61 patients with resectable desmoid tumor(s) who were treated at our institution from 1965 to February of 1992. Five patients had multifocal disease and are analyzed separately. Fifty-six patients had unifocal disease, of which 34 had positive surgical margins. Forty-five of the 56 patients with unifocal disease were treated with surgery alone, while 11 were treated with surgery plus adjuvant radiotherapy. Median follow-up was 6 years. Local control was measured from the last day of treatment, and all cases were reviewed by our Department of Pathology. RESULTS Multivariate analysis of the 56 patients with unifocal disease revealed that positive margins independently predicted for local recurrence (p < or = 0.01). Only 3 of 22 patients with clear margins experienced a local recurrence, with a 6-year actuarial local control of 85%. Multivariate analysis of the 34 patients with positive margins revealed that adjuvant radiotherapy independently predicted for improved local control (p = 0.01), and patients with recurrent disease had a slightly higher risk of local recurrence (p = 0.08). The 6-year actuarial local control determined by Kaplan-Meier for patients with unifocal disease and positive margins was 32% (+/-12%) with surgery alone, and 78% (+/-14%) with surgery plus adjuvant radiotherapy (p = 0.02). Subgroup analysis of the patients with positive margins and recurrent disease revealed that those treated with surgery alone had a 6-year actuarial local control of 0% vs. 80% for those treated with surgery plus radiotherapy (p < or = 0.01). Patients with positive margins and primary disease had a trend towards improved local control with adjuvant radiotherapy, but this was not statistically significant. None of the patients treated with radiotherapy developed serious complications or a secondary malignancy. CONCLUSIONS Margin status is the most important predictor of local recurrence for patients with resectable, unifocal desmoid tumor. Adjuvant radiotherapy is indicated in the treatment of patients with positive margins following wide excision of recurrent disease. The role of adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with positive margins following resection of primary disease is controversial, and should be based on a balanced discussion of the potential morbidity from radiotherapy compared to the potential morbidity of another local recurrence. Adjuvant radiotherapy is less likely to benefit those with clear margins due to the excellent results for these patients treated with surgery alone. The local control of desmoid tumor in the adjuvant setting is excellent with total doses ranging from 50-60 Gy, with acceptable morbidity. Field sizes should be generous to prevent marginal recurrences, and large volume MRIs of patients with extremity lesions should be used to identify those patients with multifocal disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B W Goy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UCLA School of Medicine, and the Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Eilber FR, Eckardt J. Surgical management of soft tissue sarcomas. Semin Oncol 1997; 24:526-33. [PMID: 9344318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Surgical therapy is an essential component of the treatment for soft tissue sarcomas. Although multimodality treatment has become more common for sarcomas, to achieve local control and potential cure, surgical resection of the primary tumor is necessary. The selection of the overall treatment regime for soft tissue sarcomas is predicated on tumor histology, grade, prior treatment, and to some extent on anatomic location. The surgical principles important for local tumor control are complete en bloc excision of the tumor, and pathology confirmation of tumor-free margins. The operative procedures vary with the anatomic location of the primary tumor, but the principle of pathologic free margins remains. Nonamputative resection is possible in the majority of extremity soft tissue sarcomas. Surgical resection of metastatic disease has been of value in selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F R Eilber
- Division of Surgical Oncology, the University of California at Los Angeles 90024-1782, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Eckardt J, Depierre A, Ardizzoni A, Von Pawel J, Fields S. Pooled analysis of topotecan (T) in the second-line treatment of patients (pts) with sensitive small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Eur J Cancer 1997. [DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(97)85824-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
49
|
Eckardt J, Eckhardt G, Villalona-Calero M, Drengler R, Von Hoff D. New anticancer agents in clinical development. Oncology (Williston Park) 1995; 9:1321-8; 1331; discussion 1332-4. [PMID: 8771106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
A better understanding of the biology and biochemistry of the cancer cell has led to the development of various promising new antineoplastic compounds that are now undergoing phase I, II, and III clinical testing. These drugs include topoisomerase I inhibitors, such as camptothecin and its analogs 9-aminocamptothecin, irinotecan, and topotecan; and the paclitaxel analog docetaxel. The authors discussed these new agents last month. In Part 2 of their article, they describe gemcitabine, an antimetabolite structurally related to cytarabine; fluorouracil prodrugs and other thymidylate synthase (TS) inhibitors, and new approaches to anticancer therapy, such as angiogenesis inhibitors, differentiating agents, signal transduction inhibitors, and gene therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Eckardt
- Cancer Therapy and Research Center, Institute for Drug Development, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Eckardt J, Eckhardt G, Villalona-Calero M, Drengler R, Von Hoff D. New anticancer agents in clinical development. Oncology (Williston Park) 1995; 9:1191-9. [PMID: 8703688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
A better understanding of the biology and biochemistry of the cancer cell has led to the development of various promising new antineoplastic compounds that are now undergoing phase I, II, and III clinical testing. These drugs include topoisomerase I inhibitors, such as camptothecin and its analogs 9-aminocamptothecin, irinotecan, and topotecan; the paclitaxel analog docetaxel; gemcitabine, an antimetabolite structurally related to cytarabine; and fluorouracil prodrugs and other thymidylate synthase (TS) inhibitors. Another exciting approach to cancer treatment is the use of agents that induce a less malignant state by altering cellular phenotype. Such agents include angiogenesis inhibitors, differentiating agents, signal transduction inhibitors, and gene therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Eckardt
- Cancer Therapy and Research Center, Institute for Drug Development, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|