Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab in Patients with Advanced and Progressing Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Retrospective Multicenter Experience

Efficacy and safety of SBRT combined with sintilimab and IBI305 in patients with advanced HCC and previously failed immunotherapy: study protocol of a phase 2 clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related death in China. The combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and antiangiogenic drugs, such as bevacizumab and tyrosine kinase inhibitors, has been recommended as first-line treatment for advanced HCC. However, two-thirds of patients did not benefit from this form of immunotherapy. Currently, data on the subsequent regimen for patients previously treated with ICIs are lacking. Studies have shown that the combination of radiotherapy (RT) and ICIs is a potentially effective second-line therapy for HCC. This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of combined therapy with stereotactic body RT (SBRT), sintilimab and IBI305 (a biosimilar of bevacizumab) in patients with HCC following the progression of first-line ICI therapy.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This study is an open-label, single-arm, single-centre, phase 2 trial of 21 patients with advanced HCC in whom previous ICI therapy has failed. Participants will receive approximately 30-40 Gy/5-8F SBRT, followed by 200 mg sintilimab and 15 mg/kg IBI305 intravenously every 3 weeks. Treatment will continue until the development of unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. We will use Simon's two-stage design, with the objective response rate (ORR) as the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints include ORR of lesions without RT, disease control rate, progression-free survival, overall survival and safety.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study was authorised by the Medical Ethics Committee. Dissemination of results will occur via a peer-reviewed publication and other relevant media.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR2200056068.

Immunologic tumor microenvironment modulators for turning cold tumors hot

Tumors can be classified into distinct immunophenotypes based on the presence and arrangement of cytotoxic immune cells within the tumor microenvironment (TME). Hot tumors, characterized by heightened immune activity and responsiveness to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), stand in stark contrast to cold tumors, which lack immune infiltration and remain resistant to therapy. To overcome immune evasion mechanisms employed by tumor cells, novel immunologic modulators have emerged, particularly ICIs targeting cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death-ligand 1(PD-1/PD-L1). These agents disrupt inhibitory signals and reactivate the immune system, transforming cold tumors into hot ones and promoting effective antitumor responses. However, challenges persist, including primary resistance to immunotherapy, autoimmune side effects, and tumor response heterogeneity. Addressing these challenges requires innovative strategies, deeper mechanistic insights, and a combination of immune interventions to enhance the effectiveness of immunotherapies. In the landscape of cancer medicine, where immune cold tumors represent a formidable hurdle, understanding the TME and harnessing its potential to reprogram the immune response is paramount. This review sheds light on current advancements and future directions in the quest for more effective and safer cancer treatment strategies, offering hope for patients with immune-resistant tumors.

Systemic Therapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: ASCO Guideline Update

PURPOSE

To update an evidence-based guideline to assist in clinical decision-making for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

ASCO convened an Expert Panel to update the 2020 guideline on systemic therapy for HCC. The panel updated the systematic review to include randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published through October 2023 and updated recommendations.

RESULTS

Ten new RCTs met the inclusion criteria and were added to the evidence base.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Atezolizumab + bevacizumab (atezo + bev) or durvalumab + tremelimumab (durva + treme) may be offered first-line for patients with advanced HCC, Child-Pugh class A liver disease, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1. Where there are contraindications to these therapies, sorafenib, lenvatinib, or durvalumab may be offered first-line. Following first-line treatment with atezo + bev, second-line therapy with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), ramucirumab (for patients with alpha-fetoprotein [AFP] ≥400 ng/mL), durva + treme, or nivolumab + ipilimumab (nivo + ipi) may be recommended for appropriate candidates. Following first-line therapy with durva + treme, second-line therapy with a TKI is recommended. Following first-line treatment with sorafenib or lenvatinib, second-line therapy options include cabozantinib, regorafenib for patients who previously tolerated sorafenib, ramucirumab (AFP ≥400 ng/mL), nivo + ipi, or durvalumab; atezo + bev or durva + treme may be considered for patients who did not have access to these therapies in the first-line setting, and do not have contraindications. Pembrolizumab or nivolumab are also options for appropriate patients following sorafenib or lenvatinib. Third-line therapy may be considered in Child-Pugh class A patients with good PS, using one of the agents listed previously that has a nonidentical mechanism of action with previously received therapy. A cautious approach to systemic therapy is recommended for patients with Child-Pugh class B advanced HCC. Further guidance on choosing between options is included within the guideline.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/gastrointestinal-cancer-guidelines.

Predictors of Survival in Patients With Hepatocellular Cancer Receiving Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab

OBJECTIVES

In randomized clinical trials in patients with hepatocellular cancer (HCC), combination therapy with atezolizumab and bevacizumab (Atezo-Bev) prolonged survival, and these treatments have become the standard first-line therapy for advanced HCC. However, clinical trials may not reflect real-life clinical practice due to treatment selection criteria. Thus, our aim was to understand predictors of HCC outcomes with these treatments in a real-world, multicenter setting.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients 18 years of age or older treated for advanced primary liver cancer between February 2020 and August 2022 was conducted to assess the relationship between overall survival and clinical and biochemical variables before or during treatment. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression survival analyses were performed to identify predictors of survival following treatment.

RESULTS

One hundred and eleven eligible patients with unresectable HCC received Atezo-Bev over a consecutive 30-month period. Cox regression identified several significant ( P <0.05) predictors of survival, including pretreatment albumin (hazard ratios [HR]: 0.2; CI: 0.1-0.4), total bilirubin (HR: 1.3; CI: 1.2-1.5), and international normalized ratio (HR: 5.6; CI: 2.5-12.5). In multivariate analyses, these were significantly associated as predictors of mortality, and patients with pretreatment albumin <3.5 mg/dL had significantly lower survival than those ≥3.5 (153 vs. 522 d, P <0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Pretreatment hypoalbuminemia, high bilirubin, and biochemical tests indicative of hepatic or renal dysfunction can independently predict short-term mortality in advanced HCC patients receiving Atezo-Bev.

Analysis of Somatic Mutations in the TCGA-LIHC Whole Exome Sequence to Identify the Neoantigen for Immunotherapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

There are numerous clinically proven methods for treating cancer worldwide. Immunotherapy has been used to treat cancer with significant success in the current studies. The purpose of this work is to identify somatically altered target gene neoantigens and investigate liver cancer-related immune cell interaction and functional changes for potential immunotherapy in future clinical trials. Clinical patient data from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database were used in this investigation. The R maf utility package was used to perform somatic analysis. The 17-mer peptide neoantigens were extracted using an in-house Python software called Peptide.py. Additionally, the epitope analysis was conducted using NetMHCpan4.1 program. Neopeptide immunogenicity was assessed using DeepCNN-Ineo, and tumor immune interaction, association with immune cells, correlation, and survival analysis were assessed using the TIMER web server. Based on somatic mutation analysis, we have identified the top 10 driver genes (TP53, TNN, CTNNB1, MUC16, ALB, PCLO, MUC4, ABCA13, APOB, and RYR2). From the superfamily of 20 HLA (Human leukocyte antigens) allele epitopes, we discovered 5653 neopeptides. Based on T cell receptor face hydrophobic analysis, these neopeptides were subjected to immunogenicity investigation. A mutation linked to tumor growth may have an impact on immune cells. According to this study's correlation and survival analysis, all driver genes may function as immune targets for liver cancer. These genes are recognized to be immune targets. In the future, immune checkpoint inhibitors may be developed to prolong patient survival times and prevent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) through immunotherapy.

Current Trends in Surgical Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Surgical management, including hepatic resection, liver transplantation, and ablation, offers the greatest potential for a curative approach. This review aims to discuss recent advancements in HCC surgery and identify unresolved issues in the field. Treatment selection relies on the BCLC staging system, with surgical therapies primarily recommended for early-stage disease. Recent studies have shown that patients previously considered unresectable, such as those with portal vein tumor thrombus and uncomplicated portal hypertension, may benefit from hepatic resection. Minimally invasive surgery and improved visualization techniques are also explored, alongside new techniques for optimizing future liver remnant, ex vivo resection, and advancements in hemorrhage control. Liver transplantation criteria, particularly the long-standing Milan criteria, are critically examined. Alternative criteria proposed and tested in specific regions are presented. In the context of organ shortage, bridging therapy plays a critical role in preventing tumor progression and maintaining patients eligible for transplantation. Lastly, we explore emerging ablation modalities, comparing them with the current standard, radiofrequency ablation. In conclusion, this comprehensive review provides insights into recent trends and future prospects in the surgical management of HCC, highlighting areas that require further investigation.

Efficacy and safety of atezolizumab/bevacizumab in patients with HCC after prior systemic therapy: A global, observational study

BACKGROUND

Since the introduction of the combination treatment of anti-programmed death-ligand 1 antibody atezolizumab and anti-VEGF antibody bevacizumab (AB), median overall survival in HCC has drastically improved. However, evidence on the efficacy and safety of the novel treatment standard in patients with prior exposure to systemic treatment is scarce. The aim of this global, multicenter, observational study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of AB in patients after previous systemic therapy.

METHODS

We screened our global, multicenter, prospectively maintained registry database for patients who received any systemic therapy before AB. The primary end point was overall survival; secondary end points were time-to-progression, progression-free survival, objective response rate, and safety (rate and severity of adverse events).

RESULTS

Among 493 patients who received AB for unresectable HCC, 61 patients received prior systemic therapy and were included in this analysis. The median age of the study population was 66 years, with 91.8% males. Predominant risk factors for HCC were viral hepatitis (59%) and alcohol (23%). Overall survival for AB was 16.2 (95% CI, 14.5-17.9) months, time-to-progression and progression-free survival were 4.1 (95% CI, 1.5-6.6) and 3.1 (95% CI, 1.1-5.1) months, respectively. The objective response rate was 38.2% (7.3% with complete and 30.9% with partial response). Overall survival was not influenced by treatment line (2nd vs. >2nd) or previous systemic treatment modality (tyrosine kinase inhibitors vs. immune checkpoint inhibitors). Treatment-related adverse events of all grades according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events were documented in 42.6% of patients, with only 13.1% of grade ≥3, including one death.

CONCLUSION

In this observational study, AB emerges as a safe and efficacious treatment option in patients with HCC previously treated with other systemic therapy.

Improved clinical outcomes in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with transarterial chemoembolization plus atezolizumab and bevacizumab: a bicentric retrospective study

PURPOSE

The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with atezolizumab and bevacizumab (hereafter, TACE-Atez/Bev) in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinical information was collected from consecutive patients with advanced HCC who received treatment with TACE-Atez/Bev or Atez/Bev from April 2021 and October 2022. Treatment response, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were the primary outcomes of this study. Adverse events (AEs) were the secondary outcomes. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was applied to reduce bias between two groups.

RESULTS

This study included 62 patients in the TACE-Atez/Bev group and 77 patients in the Atez/Bev group. The objective response rate (ORR) of the TACE-Atez/Bev group and the Atez/Bev group were 38.7% and 16.9% (P=0.004). However, there was no statistical difference in disease control rate between the two groups (69.4% vs 63.6%, P=0.479). Before PSM, the median OS was 14 months in the TACE-Atez/Bev group and 10 months in the Atez/Bev group (P=0.014). The median PFS in the TACE-Atez/Bev and Atez/Bev groups was 10 months and 6 months, respectively (P=0.001). After PSM, the median OS in the two groups was 14 months and 9 months, respectively (P=0.01). The median PFS was 7 months and 6 months, respectively (P=0.036). Multivariable analysis showed that treatment method was independent prognostic factors affecting OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with Atez/Bev treatment, TACE-Atez/Bev showed better OS, PFS, and ORR for Chinese patients with advanced HCC, with an acceptable safety profile.

Liver Cancer: Improving Standard Diagnosis and Therapy

In 2020, liver cancer ranked sixth for incidence (841,000 cases) and fourth for deaths globally (782,000 cases) [...].

Objective Response and Progression-Free Survival Contribute to Prolong Overall Survival in Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab Treatment for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atez/Bev) is a standard treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) due to its good antitumor and survival prolongation effects. Post-progression survival (PPS) has been reported to be a great contributor in the treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors for unresectable HCC. This study aimed to clarify the significance of progression-free survival (PFS) or PPS of Atez/Bev treatment for HCC.

METHODS

We analyzed the correlations of PFS and PPS with overall survival (OS) in studies of HCC patients treated with Atez/Bev and evaluated the contribution to OS in Atez/Bev treatment with patients at our institutions as clinical practice.

RESULTS

Analysis of 18 studies involving 3,752 patients treated with Atez/Bev found that PPS had a stronger correlation with OS (R2 = 0.872, p < 0.001) than did PFS (R2 = 0.605, p = 0.001). Analysis of 80 patients with unresectable HCC treated with Atez/Bev found that presence of antitumor responses during Atez/Bev was the most significant contributor to OS, and post-progression treatment after Atez/Bev also significantly contribute to OS.

CONCLUSION

The presence of antitumor response with tumor shrinkage during Atez/Bev treatment contributes to good OS through its durable response. Atez/Bev treatment could be considered as first-line treatment for unresectable HCC. However, there is a need for optimal biomarkers for good antitumor response.

Effectiveness and safety of atezolizumab-bevacizumab in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Atezolizumab-bevacizumab (atezo-bev) is recommended as first-line therapy for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). However, its effectiveness and safety in other populations, including those with Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) class B cirrhosis, is unclear.

Methods

For this systematic review and meta-analysis, electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, and Scopus, were searched from 1st May, 2020 till 5th October, 2022; the last date of access was January 31, 2023. Pooled progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and radiological response rate among patients receiving atezo-bev were compared between patients with CTP-A and CTP-B cirrhosis, with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and among those receiving the drug as first-line and later line therapy. The protocol was registered in Prospero (CRD42022364430).

Findings

Among 47 studies (n = 5400 patients), pooled PFS and OS were 6.86 (95% CI, 6.31-7.41) and 13.8 months (95% CI, 11.81-15.8), respectively. Objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate were 26.7% (24.6-29.1) and 75.3% (73.1-77.4) using RECIST criteria, and 34% (30.3-37.8) and 73.6% (68.8-78) using mRECIST criteria, respectively. Among those receiving atezo-bev, patients with CTP-B cirrhosis had similar ORRs by RECIST (odds ratio [OR], 1.42 [0.77-2.6]; P = 0.25) and mRECIST criteria (OR, 1.33 [0.52-3.39]; P = 0.53) but shorter PFS (mean difference [MD]:3.83 months [1.81-5.84]) than those with CTP-A cirrhosis. Compared to patients receiving TKIs, those receiving atezo-bev had longer PFS (MD: 2.27 months [0.94-3.5]) and higher ORR (RECIST: OR, 1.44 [1.01-2.04] and mRECIST: OR, 1.33 [1.01-1.75]). Compared to first-line therapy, later-line therapy had lower ORR (RECIST: OR, 1.82 [1.3-2.53]; P < 0.001 and mRECIST: OR, 2.02 [1.34-3.05]) but comparable PFS (MD: 0.58 months [-0.18 to 1.35]) among nine studies. The incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events among patients with CTP-A and CTP-B cirrhosis was comparable (OR, 0.89 [0.45-1.74]) as it was for patients receiving atezo-bev and TKIs (OR, 0.86 [0.61-1.2]).

Interpretation

Our findings suggest that atezo-bev is safe and effective as first-line systemic therapy for patients with uHCC and CTP-A or CTP-B cirrhosis.

Funding

An unsolicited grant from ROCHE Products India Pvt Ltd. was received for publication.

Predicting Outcomes of Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab Treatment in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma

A combination of atezolizumab with bevacizumab (AB) is the first regimen that has shown superiority compared to sorafenib and is now being used as the systemic treatment of choice for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with Barcelona Liver Cancer Clinic stage C. However, a considerable number of patients do not achieve survival or significant responses, indicating the need to identify predictive biomarkers for initial and on-treatment decisions in HCC patients receiving AB. In this manuscript, we summarized the current data from both experimental and clinical studies. This review will be beneficial for both clinicians and researchers in clinical practice as well as those designing experimental, translational, or clinical studies.

Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab-Bevacizumab in Real World: The First Indian Experience

Background

Atezolizumab-bevacizumab (atezo/bev) combination is a recommended first-line systemic therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). There are no studies from India reporting the safety and efficacy of this drug in real-world settings where most patients present in an advanced stage.

Methods

In this retrospective study from two centers in India, we included patients with uHCC who received atezo/bev as first-line systemic therapy. Comparison of overall survival (OS) among the different Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) classes was the primary objective, while progression-free survival (PFS), radiologic response, and adverse events to the therapy were secondary objectives.

Results

The median age of the 67 patients who received atezo/bev therapy was 61 (29-82) years, and 86% were males. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (55.2%) was the commonest cause of cirrhosis, and most patients belonged to BCLC-C (74.6%%). There were 24 patients in CTP A, 36 in CTP B, and 7 in CTP C. The median OS was 12 (95%CI, 8.16-15.83) months in the cohort. The median OS in CTP class A, B, and C was 21 (95%CI, 0-42.06) months, 9 (95%CI, 5.46-12.53) months, and 4 (95%CI, 2.14-5.85) months, respectively (P < 0.001). The median PFS in the whole cohort was 8 (95%CI, 6.03-9.96) months. The median PFS in Child A, B, and C was 18 (95%CI, 0.16-35.84) months, 8 (95%CI, 6.14-9.85) months, and 2 (95%CI, 1.77-2.23) months (P < 0.001). On mRECIST evaluation, 12.9% had achieved a complete response, 25.8% had a partial response, 27.41% had stable disease, and the rest had progressed. The objective response rate was 38.7%, and the disease control rate was 66.12%. Of the 64% who developed adverse events, 13.43% discontinued the drug. The incidence of grade ≥3 events was significantly higher in CTP C (85.7%) compared to CTP A (12.5%) and CTP B (14%) (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Atezolizumab-bevacizumab is safe and effective in uHCC in real-world settings. Candidate selection is of utmost importance in treating uHCC with atezolizumab-bevacizumab to achieve a good response. Current evidence strongly suggests limited use of atezolizumab-bevacizumab in patients with CTP C, and such individuals should not be considered for this combination therapy.