Treatment Costs and Social Burden of Pancreatic Cancer

Redefining at-risk patients undergoiong pancreaticoduodenectomy: Impact of socioeconomic factors including Area Deprivation Index and distance traveled

BACKGROUND

The Whipple procedure for pancreatic adenocarcinoma frequently is referred to surgeons at high-volume centers, which requires that patients travel long distances, potentially impacting patient outcomes. Furthermore, patients with pancreatic cancer from underserved areas often have poor outcomes. There are limited data on Whipple outcomes on the basis of both socioeconomic and distance traveled.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study examined patients who underwent the Whipple procedure for pancreatic adenocarcinoma at a tertiary care center from 2019 to 2021. Patients who lived in areas with an Area Deprivation Index national percentile of >50% and ≥100 miles away from the care center were labeled as "at-risk" patients.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight patients were included, with 22 (28.2%) patients determined to be at risk. The preoperative characteristics were comparable between the patients in the at-risk and standard-risk groups. Postoperatively, patients in the at-risk group were more likely to require reoperation (13.6% vs 0%; P = .020) and less likely to undergo adjuvant chemotherapy (73.2% vs 50%; P = .034) than patients in the standard-risk group; pathologic staging and frequency of previous use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy were not significantly different between the groups. At-risk status did not influence overall survival or recurrence rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Through the integration of distance traveled and Area Deprivation Index, we have redefined the characterization of at-risk patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma, who are at greater risk of undergoing reoperation and not receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. By addressing these intersecting challenges, providers can mitigate disparities and improve the care of these patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

The Paradox of Palliative Care at the End of Life: Higher Rates of Aggressive Interventions in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer

Background: Palliative care has shown benefit in patients with cancer; however, little is known about the overall utilization of palliative care services in patients with pancreatic cancer and the impact of aggressive end-of-life interventions. This study aimed to explore the incidence of palliative care consultations (PCCs) in hospitalized patients with pancreatic cancer in the United States and the association between palliative care consultations and the use of aggressive interventions at the end of life. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of patients hospitalized with pancreatic cancer. We examined patient records for 6 months prior to death for the presence of PCCs and aggressive end-of-life (EOL) interventions-emergency department visits, chemotherapy, and ICU stays. The use of EOL interventions was compared between those who did and those who did not receive PCCs, using Chi-square and Whitney U tests. Results: Of the 2883 identified patients, 858 had evidence of a PCC in their record in the last 6 months of life. Patients receiving PCCs were older at the time of death and more likely to receive chemotherapy (22.4% vs. 10.6%) in the last 6 months of life compared to those not receiving a palliative care consult. Similarly, patients with PCCs were more likely to have aggressive interventions in the EOL period. Conclusions: Less than 30% of patients with pancreatic cancer received a PCC. Those who received a PCC had more aggressive interventions in the end-of-life period, differing from what the prior literature has shown. Future investigations are necessary to explore the components and timing of PC and investigate their influence on the utilization of aggressive interventions and patient-centered outcomes.

Blood-Based Multiomics-Guided Detection of a Precancerous Pancreatic Tumor

Over a decade ago, longitudinal multiomics analysis was pioneered for early disease detection and individually tailored precision health interventions. However, high sample processing costs, expansive multiomics measurements along with complex data analysis have made this approach to precision/personalized medicine impractical. Here we describe in a case report, a more practical approach that uses fewer measurements, annual sampling, and faster decision making. We also show how this approach offers promise to detect an exceedingly rare and potentially fatal condition before it fully manifests. Specifically, we describe in the present case report how longitudinal multiomics monitoring (LMOM) helped detect a precancerous pancreatic tumor and led to a successful surgical intervention. The patient, enrolled in an annual blood-based LMOM since 2018, had dramatic changes in the June 2021 and 2022 annual metabolomics and proteomics results that prompted further clinical diagnostic testing for pancreatic cancer. Using abdominal magnetic resonance imaging, a 2.6 cm lesion in the tail of the patient's pancreas was detected. The tumor fluid from an aspiration biopsy had 10,000 times that of normal carcinoembryonic antigen levels. After the tumor was surgically resected, histopathological findings confirmed it was a precancerous pancreatic tumor. Postoperative omics testing indicated that most metabolite and protein levels returned to patient's 2018 levels. This case report illustrates the potentials of blood LMOM for precision/personalized medicine, and new ways of thinking medical innovation for a potentially life-saving early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Blood LMOM warrants future programmatic translational research with the goals of precision medicine, and individually tailored cancer diagnoses and treatments.

Determination of a cut-off COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST) for identifying cost-related treatment nonadherence and impaired health-related quality of life among Chinese patients with cancer

PURPOSE

This study aimed to determine a cut-off for the simplified Chinese version of the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST) that could identify cost-related treatment nonadherence among Chinese patients with cancer. The study also sought to validate this cut-off score by using it to assess impaired health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in the same population.

METHODS

A secondary analysis was conducted using data from a cross-sectional survey of 1208 Chinese patients with cancer who were recruited from 12 hospitals in six cities across three provinces of the Chinese mainland. Sociodemographic information and data on financial toxicity (FT), cost-related treatment nonadherence, and HRQoL were used in the analysis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine the optimal cut-off for the simplified Chinese version of the COST.

RESULTS

The ROC analysis identified a COST cut-off of 18.5 for identifying cost-related treatment nonadherence, yielding a sensitivity of 76.5% and specificity of 71.4%. In the validation study, this cut-off score yielded a sensitivity of 64.2% and a specificity of 67.1% for identifying impaired HRQoL.

CONCLUSION

Early and dynamic assessment of cancer-related FT in routine clinical practice may play a crucial role in the early identification and management of FT. Accordingly, a COST cut-off of 18.5 was identified to indicate cost-related treatment nonadherence and impaired HRQoL in a population of patients with cancer from the Chinese mainland. This finding may facilitate the implementation of universal FT screening among patients with cancer in specific settings such as the Chinese mainland.

Epidemiology of pancreatic cancer: New version, new vision

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is a devastating malignancy with an extremely high mortality rate and poses significant challenges to healthcare systems worldwide. The prevalence of PC risk factors spiked over the years, leading to a global increase in PC incidence rates. The contribution of different risk factors, however, varied from region to region due to genetic predisposition, environmental, social, and political factors underlying disease prevalence in addition to public health strategies. This comprehensive review aims to provide a thorough analysis of the epidemiology of PC, discussing its incidence, risk factors, screening strategies and socioeconomic burden. We compiled a wide range of seminal studies as well as epidemiological investigations to serve this review as a comprehensive guide for researchers, healthcare professionals, and policymakers keen for a more profound understanding of PC epidemiology. This review highlights the essentiality of persistent research efforts, interdisciplinary collaboration, and public health initiatives to address the expanding burden of this malignancy.

Systemic treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer is a deadly disease with an extremely poor 5-year survival rate due to treatment resistance and late-stage detection. Despite numerous years of research and pharmaceutical development, these figures have not changed. Treatment options for advanced pancreatic cancer are still limited. This illness is typically detected at a late stage, making curative surgical resection impossible. Chemotherapy is the most commonly utilized technique for treating advanced pancreatic cancer but has poor efficacy. Targeted therapy and immunotherapy have made significant progress in many other cancer types and have been proven to have extremely promising possibilities; these therapies also hold promise for pancreatic cancer. There is an urgent need for research into targeted treatment, immunotherapy, and cancer vaccines. In this review, we emphasize the foundational findings that have fueled the therapeutic strategy for advanced pancreatic cancer. We also address current advancements in targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and cancer vaccines, all of which continue to improve the clinical outcome of advanced pancreatic cancer. We believe that clinical translation of these novel treatments will improve the low survival rate of this deadly disease.