Antibiotic Treatment in End-of-Life Cancer Patients-A Retrospective Observational Study at a Palliative Care Center in Sweden

Factors associated with antibiotics for respiratory infections in Swiss long-term care facilities

BACKGROUND

Long-term care facility (LTCF) residents are twice as likely to receive antibiotics compared with elderly living in the community, and studies have reported up to half of prescriptions in LTCFs as inappropriate.

AIM

To identify factors contributing to general and inappropriate antibiotic prescription among LTCF residents with lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs).

METHODS

In this prospective, multicentric, observational study, residents with LRTIs were recruited among 32 LTCFs in Western Switzerland during winter 2022-2023. Residents underwent lung ultrasound (LUS) within three days of LRTI onset, serving as the pneumonia diagnosis reference standard. Multivariate logistic regression and backward selection were used with P < 0.1 cut-off to identify factors among demographics, vital signs, diagnostic tests, and LTCF characteristics associated with (i) antibiotic prescription and (ii) inappropriate prescription.

FINDINGS

A total of 114 residents were included, 63% female, median age 87 years. Fifty-nine (52%) residents underwent diagnostic tests: 50 (44%) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for respiratory viruses and 16 (14%) blood test with C-reactive protein and/or blood count. Sixty-three (55%) residents received antibiotics. Factors associated with antibiotic prescriptions were Rockwood Clinical Frailty Scale score ≥7, oxygen saturation <92%, performing a blood test, rural LTCFs, and female physician. Among residents receiving antibiotics, 48 (74%) had inappropriate prescriptions, with performance of respiratory virus PCR test as the only protective factor.

CONCLUSION

Whereas half of LRTI residents received antibiotics, falling within lower ranges of European LTCFs prescription rates (53-80%), most antibiotic prescriptions were inappropriate. Utilization of diagnostic tests correlates with lower overall and inappropriate prescription, advocating for their use to optimize prescription practices in LTCFs.

Antibiotics at End of Life: Where Are We Now and Where Are We Going? A Narrative Review

BACKGROUND

Antibiotics are frequently prescribed at the end of life, though the benefits and harms are not well understood.

METHODS

We abstracted relevant findings from articles published in English in the past 25 years to answer questions generated by discussion among the authors and with stakeholders in Palliative Care and Infectious Diseases.

FINDINGS

Prescribing practices vary based on individual situation and geographic location. Patients with cancer and those hospitalized receive more antibiotics than those enrolled in outpatient hospice. Urinary tract infections and pulmonary infections are the most common conditions treated with antibiotics at the end of life -most often with penicillin derivatives and vancomycin in the hospital, fluoroquinolones in outpatient, and cephalosporins in both settings. When asked, patients most often prefer limiting antibiotics to symptom management at the end of life. Physicians' over-estimation of patient preference for antibiotics and the increased probability of misdiagnosis increases antibiotic prescription rates. Antibiotics can improve symptoms when used for specific diseases at the cost of drug reactions, resistant organisms, and delayed discharge. Antibiotic use has variable results on survival duration. Antimicrobial stewardship exists in hospital and long-term care facilities, but not outpatient hospice groups. Stewardship interventions could increase proper use of antibiotics, but more information is needed to apply these interventions to hospice groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Antibiotics at the end of life are impactful and efforts to educate patients and providers will be invaluable in optimizing care.

Antibiotic Use at the End of Life: Current Practice and Ways to Optimize

Infections are common complications in end of life (EOL). However, clinicians have minimal guidance regarding antibiotic decision-making in EOL care, leading to the overuse of antibiotics. While symptom relief is frequently cited as a major reason for antibiotic use in EOL, antibiotics have not been shown to provide significant improvement in symptoms outside of urinary tract infections. In addition, when prognosis is expected to be in the range of days to weeks, antibiotics have not been shown to provide significant survival benefit. Antibiotics can be beneficial in EOL care in appropriate scenarios, but the current widespread use of antibiotics in EOL requires reevaluation. There needs to be broader efforts to think about antibiotics like other invasive medical procedures in which benefits and risks are weighed, recognizing that not all patients in EOL who receive antibiotics will benefit. In addition, during care planning process, discussing and documenting antibiotic preferences will be beneficial. Non-antibiotic symptom management should be incorporated to plan of care when infection is suspected. Ultimately, the use of antibiotics at EOL should be for the clear benefit for the recipient and should be guided by the type of infection and its clinical course, patients' primary disease and its prognosis, and the preferences of patients or surrogate decision makers.

Utilization of medical interventions in hospitalized Mexican adults with cancer at the end of life in a referral hospital: The importance of early palliative care

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the impact of early vs. late palliative care (PC) on the frequency of admissions to acute hospital settings and the utilization of end-of-life (EoL) interventions in cancer decedents.

METHODS

In this single-center, cross-sectional study, we examined the frequency of intensive care unit (ICU) and emergency department (ED) admissions among adult cancer decedents between 2018 and 2022 in a referral hospital in México. Additionally, we assessed EoL medical interventions, categorizing patients into 3 groups: those who received early PC (EPC), late PC (LPC), and those who did not receive PC (NPC).

RESULTS

We analyzed data from 1762 patients, averaging 56 ± 16.3 years old, with a predominant representation of women (56.8%). PC was administered to 45.2% of patients, but EPC was limited to only 12.3%. The median time from the initiation of PC to death was 5 days (interquartile range: 2.0-31.5). Hematological malignancies were the most prevalent, affecting 21.5% of patients. EPC recipients demonstrated notable reductions in ICU and ED admissions, as well as diminished utilization of chemotherapy, radiotherapy (RT), antibiotics, blood transfusions, and surgery when compared to both LPC and NPC groups. EPC also exhibited fewer medical interventions in the last 14 days of life, except for RT.

SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS

The findings of this study indicate that a significant proportion of EoL cancer patients receive PC; however, few receive EPC, emphasizing the need to improve accessibility to these services. Moreover, the results underscore the importance of thoughtful deliberation regarding the application of EoL medical interventions in cancer patients.

Effectiveness of Subcutaneous Administration of Antibiotics to Control Infections in Elder Palliative Patients: A Systematic Review

Background: Infections are common in patients with advanced illnesses for whom the intravenous or oral route is not possible. The subcutaneous administration of antibiotics is a promising alternative, but there is not enough theoretical support for its use. This study aims to explore the effectiveness and safety of subcutaneous antibiotic therapy in the context of palliative care in elderly patients. Methods: A systematic review was conducted using PubMed and Embase, without time or language limits. Seven articles were selected on the effectiveness of subcutaneous antibiotic therapy in adult patients with chronic progressive diseases. The quality of the articles was assessed with the Newcastle Ottawa Scale and relevant data was extracted using a selection capture file. Results: Seven quasi-experimental studies evaluated 865 elderly patients with advanced diseases, comorbidities, and infections (ie, urinary tract, respiratory system, and bone joint) who received subcutaneous antibiotic therapy (ie, Ceftriaxone, Ertapenem, and Teicoplanin). The pooled success rate of subcutaneous antibiotics for the 7 studies was 71%, the therapy failure rate was 22%, its withdrawal mean was 8%, and the mean mortality rate was 7%. The studies were of low quality and were heterogeneous in the types of infections, types of antibiotics, time of follow-up, and outcomes assessed. Conclusions: Pilot studies have found a limited number of antibiotics that can be safely used to treat specific infections. Nevertheless, the data isn´t robust enough to recommend their use.

Examining Final-Administered Medication as a Measure of Data Quality: A Comparative Analysis of Death Data with the Central Cancer Registry in Republic of Korea

Death is a crucial outcome in retrospective cohort studies, serving as a criterion for analyzing mortality in a database. This study aimed to assess the quality of extracted death data and investigate the potential of the final-administered medication as a variable to quantify accuracy for the validation dataset. Electronic health records from both an in-hospital and the Korean Central Cancer Registry were used for this study. The gold standard was established by examining the differences between the dates of in-hospital deaths and cancer-registered deaths. Cosine similarity was employed to quantify the final-administered medication similarities between the gold standard and other cohorts. The gold standard was determined as patients who died in the hospital after 2006 and whose final hospital visit/discharge date and death date differed by 0 or 1 day. For all three criteria-(a) cancer stage, (b) cancer type, and (c) type of final visit-there was a positive correlation between mortality rates and the similarities of the final-administered medication. This study introduces a measure that can provide additional accurate information regarding death and differentiates the reliability of the dataset.

Age Disparities in End of Life Symptom Management Among Patients with Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the symptoms of women with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) during their last admission before death and analyze invasive palliative management administered in relation to symptom control and survival.

MATERIALS & METHODS

A retrospective review of Israeli patients with EOC, primary peritoneal cancer (PPC) and tubal cancer, admitted to our department prior to death between 2008-2018. Basic palliative treatment was defined as administration of IV fluids, analgesics, oxygen, antiemetics, antibiotics and/or blood transfusions. Procedures regarded as invasive included: peritoneal or pleural fluid drainage; placement of an indwelling catheter, administration of total parenteral nutrition (TPN), chemotherapy and ventilation.

RESULTS

82 patients were included. Most suffered from weakness and fatigue, gastrointestinal complaints, pain and shortness of breath. 34 patients (41.5%) required only basic palliative treatment to alleviate their symptoms; however, in 48 patients (58.5%) invasive interventions were needed. Patients treated with invasive procedures were younger at death by almost 9 years (mean age of 65.73 ± 9.5 vs. 74.78 ± 9.8; p = 0.001). There were significantly more women with platinum sensitive disease in the invasive interventions group compared to the basic palliative care (60.42% vs. 32.35%; p = 0.012). No survival difference was found between the groups from diagnosis to death, relapse to death, last chemotherapy to death and last admission to death.

CONCLUSIONS

EOC patients suffer from high disease burden and multiple symptoms before death. We found that physicians tend to use more invasive care in dying younger patients. However, this aggressive treatment does not prolong survival. Futile treatments influencing quality of life should be avoided.

Safety and Tolerability of Antimicrobial Agents in the Older Patient

Older patients are at high risk of infections, which often present atypically and are associated with high morbidity and mortality. Antimicrobial treatment in older individuals with infectious diseases represents a clinical challenge, causing an increasing burden on worldwide healthcare systems; immunosenescence and the coexistence of multiple comorbidities determine complex polypharmacy regimens with an increase in drug-drug interactions and spread of multidrug-resistance infections. Aging-induced pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic changes can additionally increase the risk of inappropriate drug dosing, with underexposure that is associated with antimicrobial resistance and overexposure that may lead to adverse effects and poor adherence because of low tolerability. These issues need to be considered when starting antimicrobial prescriptions. National and international efforts have been made towards the implementation of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) interventions to help clinicians improve the appropriateness and safety of antimicrobial prescriptions in both acute and long-term care settings. AMS programs were shown to decrease consumption of antimicrobials and to improve safety in hospitalized patients and older nursing home residents. With the abundance of antimicrobial prescriptions and the recent emergence of multidrug resistant pathogens, an in-depth review of antimicrobial prescriptions in geriatric clinical practice is needed. This review will discuss the special considerations for older individuals needing antimicrobials, including risk factors that shape risk profiles in geriatric populations as well as an evidence-based description of antimicrobial-induced adverse events in this patient population. It will highlight agents of concern for this age group and discuss interventions to mitigate the effects of inappropriate antimicrobial prescribing.

Considering Patient, Family, and Provider Goals and Expectations in a Rapidly Changing Clinical Context: A Framework for Antimicrobial Stewardship at the End of Life

Antibiotic administration is often a part of end-of-life (EOL) care, including among patients who are not critically ill. Guideline-issuing bodies recommend that antimicrobial stewardship providers (ASPs) provide support to prescribers making decisions about whether or not to treat infections in this population. Relatively little is known about the rationale for antimicrobial prescribing during the EOL period in noncritical care settings, although patient and family preferences are often an influencing factor. The effectiveness of antimicrobials in improving quantity or quality of life in this population is unclear and likely context-specific.

Antibiotic Treatment in End Stage Cancer Patients; Advantages and Disadvantages

Aim:

In this study our aim was to elucidate whether advanced cancer patients benefit from antibiotic treatment in the last days of life in addition to reviewing the relevant costs and effects.

Materials And Methods:

We reviewed medical records from 100 end-stage cancer patients and their antibiotic use during the hospitalization in Imam Khomeini hospital. Patient’s medical records were analyzed retrospectively for cause and periodicity of infections, fever, increase in acute phase proteins, cultures, type and cost of antibiotic.

Results:

Microorganisms were found in only 29 patients (29%) and the most microorganism among the patients was E. coli (6%). About 78% of the patients had clinical symptoms. The highest dose of antibiotics was related to Ceftriaxone (40.2%) and in the second place was Metronidazole (34.7%) and the lowest dose was related to Levofloxacin, Gentamycin and Colistin (1.4%). Fifty-one patients (71%) did not have any side effects due to antibiotics. The most common side effect of antibiotics among patients was skin rash (12.5%). The average estimated cost for antibiotic use was 7 935 540 Rials (24.4 dollars).

Conclusion:

Prescription of antibiotics was not effective in symptom control in advanced cancer patients. The cost of using antibiotics during hospitalization is very high and also the risk of developing resistant pathogens during admission should be considered. Antibiotic side effects also occur in patients, causing more harm to the patient at the end of life. Therefore, the benefits of antibiotic advice in this time is less than its negative effects.

Perceptions and Reality of Antimicrobial Prescribing During the Transition to Comfort Measures Only at an Academic Medical Center

Background

Little is known about antimicrobial prescribing when patient care is transitioned to comfort measures only (CMO). We used a multidisciplinary survey and retrospective cohort study to gain insight into antimicrobial prescribing in this population at an academic medical center to inform future antimicrobial stewardship interventions.

Methods

A survey focusing on antimicrobial prescribing during the transition to CMO was electronically distributed to providers in medical subspecialities and responses were compared across specialties. A retrospective chart review was performed of patients admitted to an academic medical center in 2020 who were on antimicrobials in the 48 hours prior to CMO. We investigated the percentage of patients who remained on antimicrobials after the transition to CMO and rationale for continuing antimicrobials.

Results

We received 113 survey responses (35% response rate). Forty-one percent of respondents indicated that they "sometimes" or "often" continued antimicrobials during the transition to CMO. Patient/family preference and symptom palliation were the most common factors cited by respondents when deciding whether to continue antimicrobials in this population. Of the 546 patient charts reviewed, 140 (26%) patients were alive 48 hours after CMO order, and 19 (14%) of those patients remained on antimicrobials. Five of 19 (26%) patients had documentation that antimicrobials were continued due to patient/family preference and 5 of 19 (26%) patients had documentation that antimicrobials were continued for palliation of symptoms.

Conclusions

Patient/family preference and symptom palliation are important factors in prescribing antimicrobials when patient care is transitioned to CMO. More evidence is needed regarding palliative benefits of antibiotics to inform provider discussions of benefits and harms of antimicrobial use in this setting.

[Survey on antibiotic prescription practices for palliative care terminally ill patients of 75 years old and more]

Infections commonly occur terminally ill oldest patients in palliative care and questioned about antimicrobial use. The aim of this study was to describe practitioners' habits.

METHOD

ancillary study on antibiotic modalities according to the setting of care from a national practices survey based on self administered questionnaire sent by e-mail in 2017.

RESULTS

220 practitioners/327 used antibiotic, 136 worked in hospital department (52 geriatricians), 20 nursing home and 64 general practitioners (GP). GP declared less palliative care patients (6/year). The antibiotic goal was symptomatic relief for 181 (82.3%) without statistically significant difference between groups. GP (25%) were the group that most collected patient opinion for antibiotic prescription. Nursing home (23%) and GP (18%) reported more urinary tract symptoms than others (11.7%) (P=0.003). Geriatricians (59.6%) declared significantly less urinary analysis than GP (90%) (P=0.0009). 212 doctor (96.4%) faced side effect (SI): more allergic reaction and less administration difficulties than the other groups. The stop decision was collegially took (156, 70,9%) significantly more in hospital (121, 89%) than in community (25, 39.1%) (P<0.001). Patient wishes were noted by 30 (46.96%) only GP.

CONCLUSION

Even if practice and number of patients follow up differ from each place of care, doctors' intention in antibiotic use respect palliative care goal to relieve discomfort. It is hard to diagnose infection and complementary exam are scarce. A repeated individualized evaluation with patient, his surrounding and his medical referent participation, is mandatory to give a constant adapted level of care in every place of care.

Infections in hospitalised patients affected by end-stage diseases: a narrative overview

AIM

To analyse the presence and treatment of infections in hospitalised terminal patients by identifying potential risk factors.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study using health data from 229 terminally ill patients (evaluated by our hospital palliative care team (HPCT) hospitalised from January to December 2018.

RESULTS

A total of two types of infections were identified: blood flow infection (through blood cultures) and pneumonia (through radiological examinations), while the other cases of infection remained unknown. The most frequently identified microorganism was Staphylococcus spp. The prevalence of infections was higher in patients with non-oncological diseases (n=47, 36.7%; p value 0.009). The potential risk factors identified for infections were the presence of: Parkinson's disease (n=15, 11.7%; p value 0.005), dysphagia (n=49, 38.3%; p value 0.007), bedding (n=15, 11.7%; p value 0.048), pressure ulcers (n=31, 24. 2%); p value 0.018), oxygen therapy (n=60, 46.9%; p value 0.050), urinary catheters (n=95, 74.2%; p value 0.038) and polypathology (2.3 vs 1.7; p value 0.022). Parkinson's disease (OR=5.973; 95% CI=1.292-27.608), dysphagia (OR=2.090; 95% CI=1.080-4.046) and polypathology (OR=1.220; 95% CI=1.015-1.466) were confirmed by a corrected logistic regression analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Infections and, consequently, antibiotic therapies, have a high prevalence in hospitalised patients with terminal disease. Potential risk factors for infections in these patients could be polypathology, dysphagia and Parkinson's disease. Patients with these conditions could benefit from prevention programmes.

Medication chart review at end of life of paediatric palliative patients

AIM

This study aimed to review the use of medications in a paediatric palliative care (PPC) population during the last two weeks of life.

METHODS

This is a retrospective observational cohort study that included 50 consecutive patients who were referred to KK Hospital PPC service from 2011 to 2015. Those who died after two weeks from discharge date were excluded. Medication charts were reviewed and relevant data were extracted.

RESULTS

The study population included 42 patients and consists predominantly oncological and neurological diagnoses. The median number of medications used was 11.5. Ninety-five percent (40 out of 42) of study population required analgesia where 81% (34 out of 42) were opioid. There was prevalent use of antibiotics (86% of study population, 36 out of 42). Less frequently used medications included steroids, sedatives, laxatives and antiemetics (48%, 52%, 48% and 38% of study population respectively).

CONCLUSION

Significant number of medications was used in PPC during the last two weeks of life. Apart from significant use of analgesia, there is also notable use of antibiotics. Future directions in education such as prescription of laxatives with opioid are proposed.

The Use of Antibiotics in Hospice and Palliative Care Settings

Antibiotics are commonly prescribed medications in the hospice and palliative care setting, as well as in many other healthcare settings. The overuse or negligent use of antibiotics is associated with the harmful consequence of fostering the development of antibiotic-resistant pathogens. Thus, there is an urgent need to critically examine and audit antibiotic use in all aspects of healthcare. In the status quo, there is a lack of consistent standards and guidelines surrounding the use of antibiotics in hospice and palliative care settings, leading to significant variations in how antibiotics are prescribed and administered in end-of-life care. It is apparent that greater thought needs to go into antibiotic decisions for patients receiving hospice or palliative care, especially considering the harmful consequences of the overprescription of antibiotics. The literature suggests that many clinicians prescribe antibiotics inappropriately for patients who would not benefit from their use or prescribe them without adequate documentation. Clinicians should be deliberate about when they prescribe antibiotics and adhere to the appropriate documentation standards and procedures within their institution or community. Future research should seek to generate generalizable knowledge about which patients will benefit most from antibiotic therapy during end-of-life care.

Frequency and Characteristics of Patients Prescribed Antibiotics on Admission to Hospice Care

Background: Little is known about antibiotic prescribing on hospice admission despite known risks and limited evidence for potential benefits. Objective: To describe the frequency and characteristics of patients prescribed antibiotics on hospice admission. Design: Cross-sectional study. Subjects: Adult (age ≥18 years) decedents of a national, for-profit hospice chain across 19 U.S. states who died between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2019. Measures: The primary outcome was having an antibiotic prescription on hospice admission. Patient characteristics of interest were demographics, hospice referral location, hospice care location, census region, primary diagnosis, and infectious diagnoses on admission. We used multivariable logistic regression to quantify associations between study variables. Results: Among 66,006 hospice decedents, 6080 (9.2%) had an antibiotic prescription on hospice admission. Fluoroquinolones (22%) were the most frequently prescribed antibiotic class. Patients more likely to have an antibiotic prescription on hospice admission included those referred to hospice care from the hospital (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00-1.29) compared with an assisted living facility, those receiving hospice care in a private home (aOR 3.85, 95% CI 3.50-4.24), nursing home (aOR 3.65, 95% CI 3.24-4.11), assisted living facility (aOR 4.04, 95% CI 3.51-4.64), or hospital (aOR 2.43, 95% CI 2.18-2.71) compared with inpatient hospice, and those with a primary diagnosis of liver disease (aOR 2.23, 95% CI 1.82-2.74) or human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS) (aOR 3.89, 95% CI 2.27-6.66) compared with those without these diagnoses. Conclusions: Approximately 9% of hospice patients had an antibiotic prescription on hospice admission. Patients referred to hospice from a hospital, those receiving care in a noninpatient hospice facility, and those with liver disease or HIV/AIDS were more likely to have an antibiotic prescription. These results may inform future antimicrobial stewardship interventions among patients transitioning to hospice care.

Association of Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment With Inpatient Antimicrobial Use at End of Life in Patients With Cancer

Background

Antimicrobial utilization at end of life is common, but whether advance directives correlate with usage is unknown. We sought to determine whether Washington State Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) form completion or antimicrobial preferences documented therein correlate with subsequent inpatient antimicrobial prescribing at end of life.

Methods

This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of adult patients at a cancer center who died between January 1, 2016, and June 30, 2019. We used negative binomial models adjusted for age, sex, and malignancy type to test the relationship between POLST form completion ≥30 days before death, antimicrobial preferences, and antimicrobial days of therapy (DOT) per 1000 inpatient-days in the last 30 days of life.

Results

Among 1295 eligible decedents with ≥1 inpatient-day during the last 30 days of life, 318 (24.6%) completed a POLST form. Of 318, 120 (37.7%) were completed ≥30 days before death, 35/120 (29.2%) specified limited antimicrobials, 55/120 (45.8%) specified full antimicrobial use, and 30/120 (25%) omitted antimicrobial preference. Eighty-three percent (1070/1295) received ≥1 inpatient antimicrobial. The median total and intravenous (IV) antimicrobial DOT/1000 inpatient-days were 1077 and 667. Patients specifying limited antimicrobials had significantly lower total antimicrobial DOT (adjusted incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.68; 95% CI, 0.49-0.95; P = .02) and IV antimicrobial DOT (IRR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.38-0.86; P = .008) compared with those without a POLST.

Conclusions

Indicating a preference for limited antimicrobials on a POLST form ≥30 days before death may lead to less inpatient antimicrobial use in the last 30 days of life.

Infections and patterns of antibiotic utilization in support and comfort care patients: A tertiary care center experience

PURPOSE

Little is known regarding the burden of infections and clinical practice towards hospitalized patients with limits on life-sustaining measures. We aim to describe the infectious syndromes, clinical care, the emergence of multi-drug resistant organisms and outcomes in this population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective cohort of patients labeled as support or comfort care in a tertiary care center between 2016-2019.

RESULTS

A total of 347 patients were included with a mean age of 68.5 years, who were predominantly males (59.94%), bedbound (69.74%), on tube feeding (66.86%), and required indwelling urinary catheters (61.96%). The total number of admissions during the first year was 498, with the mean length of stay being 30 days. The number of infectious syndromes identified during that period was 821episodes, with a mean of 2 infectious syndromes per admission. The most common infection identified was pneumonia (41.66%) followed by urinary tract infections (27.16%). A total of 3891 microbiological cultures were taken with a mean of 5 cultures per infectious syndrome. The most commonly identified pathogens were Gram-negative bacteria (61.03%), with a high rate of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) (48.53%). The one-year mortality was 86.4%. Using carbapenem antibiotic and pneumonia were the independent predictors used for the MDROs.

CONCLUSION

Our study reflects the high burden of infections, antimicrobial resistance, and hospital admissions among a population with limited life expectancy. A consensus regarding investigating and managing of infectious syndromes, and antimicrobial prescription is needed to reduce the harms associated with overuse of antimicrobials.

Haematological cancer versus solid tumour end-of-life care: a longitudinal data analysis

OBJECTIVE

To explore differences in end-of-life healthcare utilisation and medication costs between patients with haematological malignancies and patients with solid tumours.

METHODS

Data on deceased patients with cancer were selected from the sample cohort data of health insurance claims from 2008 to 2015 in South Korea. They were categorised into two groups: patients with haematological malignancies and patients with solid tumours. Longitudinal data comprised the patient-month unit and aggregated healthcare utilisation and medication cost for 1 year before death. Healthcare utilisation included emergency room visits, hospitalisation and blood transfusions. Medication costs were subdivided into anticancer drugs, antibiotics, opioids, sedatives and blood preparation. Generalised linear mixed models were used to evaluate differences between the two groups and time trends.

RESULTS

Of the 8719 deceased patients with cancer, 349 died from haematological malignancies. Compared with solid tumours, patients with haematological malignancies were more likely to visit the emergency room (OR=1.36, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.69) and receive blood transfusions (OR=5.44, 95% CI 4.29 to 6.90). The length of hospitalisation of patients was significantly different (difference=2.49 days, 95% CI 1.75 to 3.22). Medication costs, except for anticancer treatment, increased as death approached. The costs of antibiotics and blood preparations were higher in patients with haematological malignancies than in those with solid tumours: 3.24 (95% CI 2.14 to 4.90) and 4.10 (95% CI 2.77 to 6.09) times higher, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with haematological malignancies are at a higher risk for aggressive care and economic burden at the end of life compared with those with solid tumours. Detailed attention is required when developing care plans for end-of-life care of haematological patients.

Antimicrobial use at the end of life: a scoping review

OBJECTIVE

To examine antibiotic use in patients approaching end of life, in terms of frequency of prescription, aim of treatment, beneficial and adverse effects and contribution to the development of antimicrobial resistance.

DESIGN

Scoping review DATA SOURCES: An information scientist searched Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, The Cochrane library, PubMed Clinical Queries, NHS Evidence, Epistemonikos, SIGN, NICE, Google Scholar from inception to February 2019 for any study design including, but not limited to, randomised clinical trials, prospective interventional or observational studies, retrospective studies and qualitative studies. The search of Ovid MEDLINE was updated on the 10 June 2020.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies reporting antibiotic use in patients approaching end of life in any setting and clinicians' attitudes and behaviour in relation to antibiotic prescribing in this population DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers screened studies for eligibility; two reviewers extracted data from included studies. Data were analysed to describe antibiotic prescribing patterns across different patient populations, the benefits and adverse effects (for individual patients and wider society), the rationale for decision making and clinicians behaviours and attitudes to treatment with antibiotics in this patient group.

RESULTS

Eighty-eight studies were included. Definition of the end of life is highly variable as is use of antibiotics in patients approaching end of life. Prescribing decisions are influenced by patient age, primary diagnosis, care setting and therapy goals, although patients' preferences are not always documented or adhered to. Urinary and lower respiratory tract infections are the most commonly reported indications with outcomes in terms of symptom control and survival variably reported. Small numbers of studies reported on adverse events and antimicrobial resistance. Clinicians sometimes feel uncomfortable discussing antibiotic treatment at end of life and would benefit from guidelines to direct care.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of antibiotics in patients approaching the end of life is common although there is significant variation in practice. There are a myriad of intertwined biological, ethical, social, medicolegal and clinical issues associated with the topic.

Antibiotic use during end-of-life care: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

We performed a systematic literature review and meta-analysis measuring the burden of antibiotic use during end-of-life (EOL) care.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, CINAHL (EBSCO platform), and Embase (Elsevier platform), through July 2019 for studies with the following inclusion criteria in the initial analysis: antibiotic use in the EOL care patients (advanced dementia, cancer, organ failure, frailty or multi-morbidity). If the number of patients in palliative care consultation (PCC) was available, antibiotic use data were pooled to compare the proportion of patients who received antibiotics under PCC compared to those not receiving PCC. Random-effect models were used to obtain pooled mean differences, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 value.

RESULTS

Overall, 72 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final review: 22 EOL studies included only patients with cancer; 17 studies included only patients with advanced dementia; and 33 studies included "mixed populations" of EOL patients. Although few studies reported antibiotic using standard metrics (eg, days of therapy), 48 of 72 studies (66.7%) reported antibiotic use in >50% of all patients. When the 3 studies that evaluated antibiotic use in PCC were pooled together, patients under PCC was more likely to receive antibiotics compared to patients not under PCC (pooled odds ratio, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.02-2.93).

CONCLUSIONS

Future studies are needed to evaluate the benefits and harms of using antibiotics for patients during EOL care in diverse patient populations.

Early palliative care of non-small cell lung cancer in the context of immunotherapy

The most common cause of mortality due to malignant neoplasms in the general population around the world is lung cancer. In the last 10 years, there has been an enormous improvement in the treatment of this disease, mainly due to the immunotherapy that activates the immune system to fight cancer. Patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer are a special group of patients requiring not only cancer treatment but also considerable support in the treatment of cancer-related problems, as well as comorbidities. Early palliative care is important in this area. In addition, there is certain evidence that medicines most commonly administered in palliative care may lower the efficacy of immunotherapy. The present review article compares information on the prolonging of life after early hospice care, which has become the foundation of current standards of management in patients with metastatic lung cancer, and reports of decreased efficacy of the immunotherapy due to the administration of major palliative care medications.

Determinants of doctors' antibiotic prescriptions for patients over 75 years old in the terminal stage of palliative care

INTRODUCTION

Notwithstanding high prevalence of presumably bacterial infections in elderly persons (EP) in palliative care (PC), there exists no recommendation on the role of antibiotic therapy (ABP) in this type of situation.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the determinants of antibiotic prescription by general practitioners (GP) and by doctors practicing in institutions (DPI) for patients>75 years, in end-of-life situations in PC.

METHOD

Descriptive investigation by anonymous self-administered questionnaire disseminated in France by e-mail.

RESULTS

A total of 301 questionnaires analyzed: 113 GP, 188 DPIs. The latter were mainly geriatricians (69, 36.6%) and infectologists/internists (41, 21.8%). Sixty-three (55,75%) GPs and 144 (78.7%) DPIs stated that they had prescribed antibiotics. Practice in "EHPAD" retirement homes or intensive care was often associated with non-prescription of antibiotics. Age, PC training and number of patients monitored bore no influence. Family involvement in decision-making was more frequent for GPs than for DPIs. The main purpose of antibiotic therapy was to relieve different symptoms (fever, respiratory congestion, functional urinary signs). Most of the doctors (81%) had previously encountered complications (allergy, adverse effect), which represented the main causes of treatment discontinuation.

CONCLUSION

Antibiotic use in end-of-life EPs in PC seems frequent. In accordance with the principle of beneficence, its goal of often symptom-related; that said, in the absence of scientific data, antibiotic prescription in end-of-life situations should be individualized in view of observing the other ethical caregiving principles (beneficence, non-maleficence, justice, patient autonomy) and re-evaluated daily.

Status and cost analysis of antimicrobial treatment of terminally ill patients with hematological malignancy in an acute hospital

OBJECTIVE

Terminally ill patients with hematological malignancy tend to be treated aggressively. We aimed to clarify the status and costs of antimicrobial treatment of patients dying with hematological malignancies.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted in a Japanese acute hospital between September 2010 and August 2015. A total of 141 patients who stayed for 14 days or longer and died in the hospital were investigated.

RESULTS

The median patient age was 67 years (range, 22-93). Most patients were treated with antibacterial, antifungal, and antiviral agents (98%, 75%, and 27% of the patients, respectively) in the last 14 days of their lives. The frequency of antibiotics used in the last 7 days did not differ from that of the week before. The median cost of antimicrobials was 245,000 JPY (2227 USD), which reflected 16% of the total medical costs spent over the last 14 days. A subgroup analysis of the patients according to care policy (aggressive care policy (A) and palliative care policy (P), respectively) showed that the total medical cost in group P in the last 7 days decreased from that of the preceding week; however, the cost of antimicrobials did not lessen even in the last 7 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients dying with hematological malignancy were treated with a broad spectrum of antimicrobials. It appeared to be difficult to reduce, let alone discontinue antimicrobial treatment even in patients treated according to the palliative care policy. The optimal use of antibiotics for hematological patients in their end-of-life should be discussed.

Antimicrobial use and misuse at the end of life: a retrospective analysis of a treatment escalation/limitation plan

BACKGROUND

Antimicrobial treatment is common at end of life. A treatment escalation/limitation plan (TELP) offers the opportunity to avoid non-beneficial treatment in critically ill patients. Our aim was to evaluate antimicrobial prescribing in terminally ill patients, and assess whether it was modified using a TELP.

METHODS

Appropriateness of antimicrobial treatment was audited using a priori criteria in 94 consecutive hospital deaths. Prescribing in patients whose death was expected/unexpected, and who had a TELP with/without a 'ceiling' for antimicrobials, were compared.

RESULTS

Twenty three of 94 patients (24.5%) were receiving antimicrobials at time of death. This was not influenced by evidence of infection or whether death was expected. The use of a TELP (n = 81) with an antimicrobial 'ceiling' (28 with, 53 without) was associated with a significant reduction in antimicrobials administered (28.6% vs 81.1%; p < 0.0005).

CONCLUSIONS

Many complex factors contribute to antimicrobial misuse at end of life. An appropriately constructed TELP reduces inappropriate prescribing.

Palliative care infections and antibiotic cost: a vicious circle

Aim: In this study our aim was to evaluate the nosocomial infections and to understand factors affecting the cost of used antibiotics in palliative care unit.Materials and methods: Between 2016 and 2017, 113 patients were included in the study in palliative care unit of University of Health Sciences Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Research and Training Hospital. Patients medical records were analyzed retrospectively for nosocomial infections, chronic diseases, presence of decubitis ulcers, opioid use, enteral, parenteral feedings, mortality and antibiotic cost.Results: Nosocomial infections were observed in 74.3% of the cases and 92.0% of patients used antibiotics. The mean duration of antibiotic use was 23.13 ± 18.06 days; and the average antibiotic cost was 2009.72 ± 2153.37 TL. Length of stay, male sex, presence of decubitus ulcers, tracheostomy, enteral and parenteral nutrition significantly increased antibiotic cost. Antibiotic cost and mortality were not related statistically.Conclusions: A vicious circle in palliative care involves the following order: length of stay, increased rate of infection, use of antibiotics, infection with resistant microorganisms, use of broad spectrum antibiotics, increased length of stay; all affecting each other. Therefore, using antibiotics for aggressive treatment of infections in palliative care is contraindicated as it opposes to real philosophy of palliative care.

Variations in Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment Program across the Nation: Environmental Scan

Background: Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) is an advance care planning tool that is designed to document end-of-life (EoL) care wishes of those living with limited life expectancies. Although positive impacts of POLST program has been studied, variations in state-specific POLST programs across the nation remain unknown. Objective: Identify state variations in POLST forms and determine if variations are associated with program maturity status. Design: Environmental scan. Measurements: Using the national POLST website, state-specific POLST program characteristics were examined. With available sample POLST forms, EoL care options were abstracted. Results: Of all 51 states (50 United States states and Washington, D.C examined), the majority (n = 48, 98%) were actively participating in POLST; 3 states (5.9%) had Mature status, 19 states and District of Columbia (39.2%) were Endorsed, 24 states were in the developing phase (47.1%), and 4 states (7.8%) were nonconforming. Forty-five states (88.2%) had forms available for review. Antibiotic and intravenous fluid options were identified in 32 (71.1%), and 33 (73.3%) POLST forms, respectively. Hospital transfer and use of oxygen were mentioned in all forms. Use of respiratory devices (i.e., continuous positive airway pressure and bi-level positive airway pressure) were mentioned on 27 (60%) forms, whereas ventilator or intubation use were mentioned in 36 POLST forms (80%). No associations were found between POLST maturity status and provision of treatment options. Conclusions: Variations in integration of infection and symptom management options were identified. Further research is needed to determine if there are regional factors associated with provision of treatment options on POLST forms and if there are differences in actual rates of infection or symptoms reported.

Does Decision-making in End-of-life Care Differ Between Graduating Medical Students and Experienced Physicians?

BACKGROUND/AIM

Appropriate decision-making in end-of-life (EOL) care is essential for both junior and senior physicians. The aim of this study was to compare the decision-making and attitudes of medical students with those of experienced general practitioners (GP) regarding EOL-care.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A questionnaire presenting three cancer patient scenarios concerning decisions and ethical aspects of EOL-care was offered to 500 Finnish GPs and 639 graduating medical students in 2015-2016.

RESULTS

Responses were received from 222 (47%) GPs and 402 (63%) students. The GPs withdrew antibiotics (p<0.001) and nasogastric tubes (p=0.007) and withheld resuscitation (p<0.001), blood transfusions (p=0.002) and pleural drainage (p<0.001) more often than did the students. The students considered euthanasia and assisted suicide less reprehensible (p<0.001 in both) than did the GPs.

CONCLUSION

Medical students were more unwilling to withhold and withdraw therapies in EOL-care than were the GPs, but the students considered euthanasia less reprehensible. Medical education should include aspects of decision-making in EOL-care.

Initiating End-of-Life Care at the Emergency Department: An Observational Study

OBJECTIVE

Terminally ill patients at their end-of-life (EOL) phase attending the emergency department (ED) may have complex and specialized care needs frequently overlooked by ED physicians. To tailor to the needs of this unique group, the ED in a tertiary hospital implemented an EOL pathway since 2014. The objective of our study is to describe the epidemiological characteristics, symptom burden and management of patients using a protocolized management care bundle.

METHODS

We conducted an observational study on the database of EOL patients over a 28-month period. Patients aged 21 years and above, who attended the ED and were managed according to these guidelines, were included. Clinical data were extracted from the hospital's electronic medical records system.

RESULTS

Two hundred five patients were managed under the EOL pathway, with a slight male predominance (106/205, 51.7%) and a median age of 78 (interquartile range 69-87) years. The majority were chronically frail (42.0%) or diagnosed with cancer or other terminal illnesses (32.7%). The 3 most commonly experienced symptoms were drowsiness (66.3%), dyspnea (61.5%), and fever (29.7%). Through the protocolized management care bundle, 74.1% of patients with dyspnea and/or pain received opiates while 59.5% with copious secretions received hyoscine butylbromide for symptomatic relief.

CONCLUSION

The institution of a protocolized care bundle is feasible and provides ED physicians with a guide in managing EOL patients. Though still suboptimal, considerable advances in EOL care at the ED have been achieved and may be further improved through continual education and enhancements in the care bundle.

Antimicrobial prescribing in patients with advanced-stage illness in the antimicrobial stewardship era

OBJECTIVE

Antimicrobials are frequently administered to patients with an advanced-stage illness. Understanding the current practice of antimicrobial use at the end of life and the factors influencing physicians' prescribing behavior is necessary to develop an effective antimicrobial stewardship program and to provide optimal end-of-life care for terminally ill patients.

DESIGN

A 1-year retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

A public tertiary-care center.PatientsThe study included 260 adult patients who were hospitalized and later died at the study institution with an advanced-stage illness.

RESULTS

Of 260 patients in our study cohort, 192 (73.8%) had an advanced-stage malignancy and 136 (52.3%) received antimicrobial therapy in the last 14 days of their life; of the latter, 60 (44.1%) received antimicrobials for symptom relief. Overall antimicrobial use in the last 14 days of life was 421.9 days of therapy per 1,000 patient days. Factors associated with antimicrobial use in this period included a history of antimicrobial use prior to the last 14 days of life during index hospitalization (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 4.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.67-8.84) and antipyretic use in the last 14 days of life (aOR, 4.19; 95% CI, 2.01-8.71).

CONCLUSION

Approximately half of the patients hospitalized with an advanced-stage illness received antimicrobials in the last 14 days of life. The factors associated with antimicrobial use at the end of life in this study are likely to explain physicians' prescribing behaviors. In the current era of antimicrobial stewardship, reconsidering antimicrobial use in terminally ill patients is necessary.

Does special education in palliative medicine make a difference in end-of-life decision-making?

Background

Characteristics of the physician influence the essential decision-making in end-of-life care. However, the effect of special education in palliative medicine on different aspects of decision-making in end-of-life care remains unknown. The aim of this study was to explore the decision-making in end-of-life care among physicians with or without special competency in palliative medicine (cPM).

Methods

A questionnaire including an advanced lung cancer patient-scenario with multiple decision options in end-of-life care situation was sent to 1327 Finnish physicians. Decisions to withdraw or withhold ten life-prolonging interventions were asked on a scale from 1 (definitely would not) to 5 (definitely would) – first, without additional information and then after the family’s request for aggressive treatment and the availability of an advance directive. Values from chronological original scenario, family’s appeal and advance directive were clustered by trajectory analysis.

Results

We received 699 (53%) responses. The mean values of the ten answers in the original scenario were 4.1 in physicians with cPM, 3.4 in general practitioners, 3.4 in surgeons, 3.5 in internists and 3.8 in oncologists (p < 0.05 for physicians with cPM vs. oncologists and p < 0.001 for physicians with cPM vs. others). Younger age and not being an oncologist or not having cPM increased aggressive treatment decisions in multivariable logistic regression analysis. The less aggressive approach of physicians with cPM differed between therapies, being most striking concerning intravenous hydration, nasogastric tube and blood transfusions. The aggressive approach increased by the family’s request (p < 0.001) and decreased by an advance directive (p < 0.001) in all physicians, regardless of special education in palliative medicine.

Conclusion

Physicians with special education in palliative medicine make less aggressive decisions in end-of-life care. The impact of specialty on decision-making varies among treatment options. Education in end-of-life care decision-making should be mandatory for young physicians and those in specialty training.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12904-018-0349-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Long-Acting Lipoglycopeptides for Gram-Positive Bacteremia at the End of Life to Facilitate Hospice Care: A Report of 3 Cases

Administering and monitoring intravenous antimicrobials may cause discomfort in patients at the end of life and delay transition to hospice. We describe 3 patients with terminal cancer with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus gallolyticus, and Granulicatella adiacens bacteremia who were managed with the long-acting lipoglycopeptide oritavancin to facilitate discharge to hospice.

Clinical Intentions of Antibiotics Prescribed Upon Discharge to Hospice Care

OBJECTIVES

To better understand the clinical intentions for antibiotic prescribing upon discharge from acute care to hospice care.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Five hundred forty-four-bed academic, acute-care, tertiary referral hospital in Portland, Oregon.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults (≥18) who received an outpatient prescription for antibiotics on discharge from an acute care hospital to hospice care between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2011 (N = 149).

MEASUREMENTS

We determined whether antibiotics were indicated for treatment of an active infection, palliative treatment, prophylaxis, or prescribed according to family or participant preference.

RESULTS

Antibiotics were prescribed to 17.6% (n = 149) of individuals discharged to hospice care over the 3-year study period. Antibiotics were most frequently prescribed for pneumonia (19.5%), urinary tract infections (18.9%), and gastrointestinal tract infections (17.0%). The explicit rationale for antibiotic prescription was documented for only 72 prescriptions (45.3%). For 84 (52.8%) participants, antibiotics were used to treat an active infection in the hospital. Of prescriptions with a documented rationale, 37.5% indicated that the intent was curative, 26.4% prophylaxis, and 22.2% to suppress an infection. For 19.4% of prescriptions, participants or their family members specifically wanted to be treated with antibiotics. Only 9.7% of prescriptions specifically indicated that antibiotics were prescribed for palliative reasons.

CONCLUSION

Antibiotics were frequently prescribed for treatment of active infection in individuals discharged to hospice care. Further research is needed to document antibiotic benefits and risks and optimize medication management at the end of life.

Burden and Management of Multidrug-Resistant Organisms in Palliative Care

Palliative care includes comprehensive strategies to optimize quality of life for patients and families confronting terminal illness. Infections are a common complication in terminal illness, and infections due to multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) are particularly challenging to manage in palliative care. Limited data suggest that palliative care patients often harbor MDRO. When MDROs are present, distinguishing colonization from infection is challenging due to cognitive impairment or metastatic disease limiting symptom assessment and the lack of common signs of infection. Multidrug-resistant organisms also add psychological burden through infection prevention measures including patient isolation and contact precautions which conflict with the goals of palliation. Moreover, if antimicrobial therapy is indicated per goals of care discussions, available treatment options are often limited, invasive, expensive, or associated with adverse effects that burden patients and families. These issues raise important ethical considerations for managing and containing MDROs in the palliative care setting.

Vitamin D supplementation to palliative cancer patients shows positive effects on pain and infections-Results from a matched case-control study

BACKGROUND

We previously showed an association between low vitamin D levels and high opioid doses to alleviate pain in palliative cancer patients. The aim of this case-controlled study was to investigate if vitamin D supplementation could improve pain management, quality of life (QoL) and decrease infections in palliative cancer patients.

METHODS

Thirty-nine palliative cancer patients with levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D < 75 nmol/L were supplemented with vitamin D 4000 IE/day, and were compared to 39 untreated, matched "control"-patients from a previous study at the same ward. Opioid doses, antibiotic consumption and QoL-scores measured with the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) were monitored. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline after 1 and 3 months compared between the groups using linear regression with adjustment for a potential cofounding factor.

RESULTS

After 1 month the vitamin D treated group had a significantly decreased fentanyl dose compared to the untreated group with a difference of 46 μg/h; 95% CI 24-78, which increased further at 3 months to 91 μg/h; 95% CI 56-140 μg/h. The ESAS QoL-score improved in the Vitamin D group the first month; -1.4; 95% CI -2.6 - (-0.21). The vitamin D-treated group had significantly lower consumption of antibiotics after 3 months compared to the untreated group, the difference was -26%; 95%CI -0.41%-(-0.12%). Vitamin D was well tolerated by all patients and no adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSION

Vitamin D supplementation to palliative cancer patients is safe and improvement in pain management is noted as early as 1 month after treatment. Decreased infections are noted 3 months after vitamin D treatment. The results from this pilot-study have been used for the power-calculation of a future randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study called "Palliative-D" that will start in Nov 2017 and will include 254 palliative cancer patients.