Integration of Molecular Information in Risk Assessment of Patients with Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Risk factors for ischemic stroke in patients with Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms

BACKGROUND

Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (Ph-negative MPNs) are linked with various complications, notably ischemic stroke. The study aims to identify risk factors for ischemic stroke in Ph-negative MPNs patients.

METHODS

Patients were categorized into two groups based on whether they had experienced ischemic stroke. Subsequently, an analysis of demographics, biochemical makers, and genetic mutations (JAK2V617F and CALR mutations), was conducted to identify potential associations with an elevated risk of ischemic stroke in individuals with Ph-negative MPNs.

RESULTS

A total of 185 patients diagnosed with Ph-negative MPNs participated in the study, including 82 with essential thrombocythemia (ET), 78 with polycythemia vera (PV), and 25 with primary myelofibrosis (PMF). Among these, 57 patients (30.8 %) had a history of ischemic stroke. Independent risk factors associated with ischemic stroke in Ph-negative MPNs patients included hypertension (OR = 5.076) and smoking (OR = 5.426). Among ET patients, smoking (OR = 4.114) and an elevated percentage of neutrophils (OR = 1.080) were both positively correlated with ischemic stroke incidence. For PV patients, hypertension (OR = 4.647), smoking (OR = 6.065), and an increased percentage of lymphocytes (OR = 1.039) were independently associated with ischemic stroke. Regardless of the presence of the JAK2V617F mutation, hypertension was the sole positively and independently associated risk factor for ischemic stroke. The odds ratios for patients with the JAK2V617F mutation was 3.103, while for those without the mutation, it was 11.25.

CONCLUSIONS

Hypertension was a more substantial factor associated with an increased incidence of ischemic stroke in Ph-negative MPNs patients.

Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential: implications for the cardiologists

Myeloproliferative neoplasms, including polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia, and myelofibrosis, are characterized by somatic gene mutations in bone marrow stem cells, which trigger an inflammatory response influencing the development of associated cardiovascular complications. In recent years, the same mutations were found in individuals with cardiovascular diseases even in the absence of hematological alterations. These genetic events allow the identification of a new entity called 'clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential' (CHIP), as it was uncertain whether it could evolve toward hematological malignancies. CHIP is age-related and, remarkably, myocardial infarction, stroke, and heart failure were frequently reported in these individuals and attributed to systemic chronic inflammation driven by the genetic mutation. We reviewed the connection between clonal hematopoiesis, inflammation, and cardiovascular diseases, with a practical approach to improve clinical practice and highlight the current unmet needs in this area of knowledge.

High cell-free DNA is associated with disease progression, inflammasome activation and elevated levels of inflammasome-related cytokine IL-18 in patients with myelofibrosis

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorder classified among chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms, characterized by exacerbated myeloid and megakaryocytic proliferation and bone marrow fibrosis. It is induced by driver (JAK2/CALR/MPL) and high molecular risk mutations coupled to a sustained inflammatory state that contributes to disease pathogenesis. Patient outcome is determined by stratification into risk groups and refinement of current prognostic systems may help individualize treatment decisions. Circulating cell-free (cf)DNA comprises short fragments of double-stranded DNA, which promotes inflammation by stimulating several pathways, including inflammasome activation, which is responsible for IL-1β and IL-18 maturation and release. In this work, we assessed the contribution of cfDNA as a marker of disease progression and mediator of inflammation in MF. cfDNA was increased in MF patients and higher levels were associated with adverse clinical outcome, a high-risk molecular profile, advanced disease stages and inferior overall survival, indicating its potential value as a prognostic marker. Cell-free DNA levels correlated with tumor burden parameters and markers of systemic inflammation. To mimic the effects of cfDNA, monocytes were stimulated with poly(dA:dT), a synthetic double-stranded DNA. Following stimulation, patient monocytes released higher amounts of inflammasome-processed cytokine, IL-18 to the culture supernatant, reflecting enhanced inflammasome function. Despite overexpression of cytosolic DNA inflammasome sensor AIM2, IL-18 release from MF monocytes was shown to rely mainly on the NLRP3 inflammasome, as it was prevented by NLRP3-specific inhibitor MCC950. Circulating IL-18 levels were increased in MF plasma, reflecting in vivo inflammasome activation, and highlighting the previously unrecognized involvement of this cytokine in MF cytokine network. Monocyte counts were higher in patients and showed a trend towards correlation with IL-18 levels, suggesting monocytes represent a source of circulating IL-18. The close correlation shown between IL-18 and cfDNA levels, together with the finding of enhanced DNA-triggered IL-18 release from monocytes, suggest that cfDNA promotes inflammation, at least in part, through inflammasome activation. This work highlights cfDNA, the inflammasome and IL-18 as additional players in the complex inflammatory circuit that fosters MF progression, potentially providing new therapeutic targets.

BCR::ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms in the era of next-generation sequencing

The classical BCR::ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms such as polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and myelofibrosis (MF) are clonal diseases with the presence of characteristic "driver mutations" in one of the genes: JAK2, CALR, or MPL. The search for mutations in these three genes is required for the diagnosis of MPNs. Nevertheless, the progress that has been made in the field of molecular genetics has opened a new era in medicine. The search for additional mutations in MPNs is helpful in assessing the risk stratification, disease progression, transformation to acute myeloid leukemia (AML), or choosing the right treatment. In some cases, advanced technologies are needed to find a clonal marker of the disease and establish a diagnosis. This review focuses on how the use of new technologies like next-generation sequencing (NGS) helps in the diagnosis of BCR::ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Whole Exome Sequencing Reveals Novel Variants in Unexplained Erythrocytosis

Erythrocytosis is characterized by an increase in red cells in peripheral blood. Polycythemia vera, the commonest primary erythrocytosis, results from pathogenic variants in JAK2 in ∼98% of cases. Although some variants have been reported in JAK2-negative polycythemia, the causal genetic variants remain unidentified in ∼80% of cases. To discover genetic variants in unexplained erythrocytosis, we performed whole exome sequencing in 27 patients with JAK2-negative polycythemia after excluding the presence of any mutations in genes previously associated with erythrocytosis (EPOR, VHL, PHD2, EPAS1, HBA, and HBB). We found that the majority of patients (25/27) had variants in genes involved in epigenetic processes, including TET2 and ASXL1 or in genes related to hematopoietic signaling such as MPL and GFIB. Based on computational analysis, we believe that variants identified in 11 patients in this study could be pathogenic although functional studies will be required for confirmation. To our knowledge, this is the largest study reporting novel variants in individuals with unexplained erythrocytosis. Our results suggest that genes involved in epigenetic processes and hematopoietic signaling pathways are likely associated with unexplained erythrocytosis in individuals lacking JAK2 mutations. With very few previous studies targeting JAK2-negative polycythemia patients to identify underlying variants, this study opens a new avenue in evaluating and managing JAK2-negative polycythemia.

Association of Myelofibrosis Phenotypes with Clinical Manifestations, Molecular Profiles, and Treatments

Myelofibrosis (MF) presents an array of clinical manifestations and molecular profiles. The two distinct phenotypes- myeloproliferative and myelodepletive or cytopenic- are situated at the two poles of the disease spectrum and are largely defined by different degrees of cytopenias, splenomegaly, and distinct molecular profiles. The myeloproliferative phenotype is characterized by normal/higher peripheral blood counts or mildly decreased hemoglobin, progressive splenomegaly, and constitutional symptoms. The myeloproliferative phenotype is typically associated with secondary MF, higher JAK2 V617F burden, fewer mutations, and superior overall survival (OS). The myelodepletive phenotype is usually associated with primary MF, ≥2 cytopenias, modest splenomegaly, lower JAK2 V617F burden, higher fibrosis, greater genomic complexity, and inferior OS. Cytopenias are associated with mutations in epigenetic regulators/splicing factors, clonal evolution, disease progression, and shorter OS. Clinical variables, in conjunction with the molecular profiles, inform integrated prognostication and disease management. Ruxolitinib/fedratinib and pacritinib/momelotinib may be more suitable to treat patients with the myeloproliferative and myelodepletive phenotypes, respectively. Appreciation of MF heterogeneity and two distinct phenotypes, the different clinical manifestations and molecular profiles associated with each phenotype alongside the growing treatment expertise, the development of non-myelosuppressive JAK inhibitors, and integrated prognostication are leading to a new era in patient management. Physicians can increasingly tailor personalized treatments that will address the unique unmet needs of MF patients, including those presenting with the myelodepletive phenotype, to elicit optimal outcomes and extended OS across the disease spectrum.

Cytological Diagnosis of Classic Myeloproliferative Neoplasms at the Age of Molecular Biology

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are clonal hematopoietic stem cell-derived disorders characterized by uncontrolled proliferation of differentiated myeloid cells. Two main groups of MPN, BCR::ABL1-positive (Chronic Myeloid Leukemia) and BCR::ABL1-negative (Polycythemia Vera, Essential Thrombocytosis, Primary Myelofibrosis) are distinguished. For many years, cytomorphologic and histologic features were the only proof of MPN and attempted to distinguish the different entities of the subgroup BCR::ABL1-negative MPN. World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms evolves over the years and increasingly considers molecular abnormalities to prove the clonal hematopoiesis. In addition to morphological clues, the detection of JAK2, MPL and CALR mutations are considered driver events belonging to the major diagnostic criteria of BCR::ABL1-negative MPN. This highlights the preponderant place of molecular features in the MPN diagnosis. Moreover, the advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS) allowed the identification of additional somatic mutations involved in clonal hematopoiesis and playing a role in the prognosis of MPN. Nowadays, careful cytomorphology and molecular biology are inseparable and complementary to provide a specific diagnosis and to permit the best follow-up of these diseases.

TET2 Mutation May Be More Valuable in Predicting Thrombosis in ET Patients Compared to PV Patients: A Preliminary Report

Thrombosis is a common complication of myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN), and it is a major cause of disability and death. With the development of next-generation gene-sequencing technology, the relationship between non-driver mutations and thrombotic risk factors has also attracted considerable attention. To analyze the risk factors of thrombosis in patients with essential thrombocythemia (ET) and polycythemia vera (PV), we retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 125 MPN patients (75 ET and 50 PV) and performed a multivariate analysis of the risk factors of thrombosis using a Cox proportional risk model. Among the 125 patients, 35 (28.0%) had thrombotic events, and the incidence of thrombotic events was 21.3% and 38.0% in ET and PV patients, respectively. In ET patients, the multivariate analysis showed that a TET2 mutation and history of remote thrombosis were independent risk factors for thrombosis in ET patients, with an HR of 4.1 (95% CI: 1.40-12.01; p = 0.01) for TET2 mutation and 6.89 (95% CI: 1.45-32.68; p = 0.015) for a history of remote thrombosis. In PV patients, the multivariate analysis presented the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (HR: 4.77, 95% CI: 1.33-17.16; p = 0.017) and a history of remote thrombosis (HR: 1.67, 95% CI: 1.03-1.32; p = 0.014) as independent risk factors for thrombosis, with no significant change in the risk of thrombosis in patients with TET2 mutations. A further analysis of the clinical characteristics and coagulation occurring in ET patients with a TET2 mutation revealed that the values of age and D-dimer were significantly higher and antithrombin III was significantly lower in TET2-mutated ET patients compared to TET2-unmutated patients. In summary, TET2 mutation may be more valuable in predicting thrombosis in ET patients than in PV patients. ET patients with a TET2 mutation are older and present differences in coagulation compared to TET2-unmutated patients.

International Consensus Classification of Myeloid Neoplasms and Acute Leukemias: integrating morphologic, clinical, and genomic data

The classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemias was last updated in 2016 within a collaboration between the World Health Organization (WHO), the Society for Hematopathology, and the European Association for Haematopathology. This collaboration was primarily based on input from a clinical advisory committees (CACs) composed of pathologists, hematologists, oncologists, geneticists, and bioinformaticians from around the world. The recent advances in our understanding of the biology of hematologic malignancies, the experience with the use of the 2016 WHO classification in clinical practice, and the results of clinical trials have indicated the need for further revising and updating the classification. As a continuation of this CAC-based process, the authors, a group with expertise in the clinical, pathologic, and genetic aspects of these disorders, developed the International Consensus Classification (ICC) of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemias. Using a multiparameter approach, the main objective of the consensus process was the definition of real disease entities, including the introduction of new entities and refined criteria for existing diagnostic categories, based on accumulated data. The ICC is aimed at facilitating diagnosis and prognostication of these neoplasms, improving treatment of affected patients, and allowing the design of innovative clinical trials.

The Classification of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Rationale, Historical Background and Future Perspectives with Focus on Unclassifiable Cases

Simple Summary

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are clonal hematological disorders, characterized by increased proliferation of the myeloid lineages in the bone marrow. Since their original recognition by William Damashek in 1951, MPNs have been extensively investigated at a clinical-pathological and molecular level. This prompted a progressive refinement of their classification and diagnostic criteria. Uncertainties nonetheless remain in a small (yet consistent) subset of cases, characterized by unconventional and/or overlapping clinical-pathological features. Such cases (referred to as MPN, unclassifiable [MPN-U]) encompass a broad spectrum of entities, including early phase MPNs, terminal (i.e., fibrotic) MPNs, MPNs associated with inflammatory or neoplastic disorders, and poorly characterized MPNs with clinical-pathological mismatch or atypical molecular features. In this review, we discuss the rationale behind the classification and diagnostic criteria of MPNs, focusing on the still open issues concerning MPN-U.

Abstract

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are a heterogeneous group of clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorders, characterized by increased proliferation of one or more myeloid lineages in the bone marrow. The classification and diagnostic criteria of MPNs have undergone relevant changes over the years, reflecting the increased awareness on these conditions and a better understanding of their biological and clinical-pathological features. The current World Health Organization (WHO) Classification acknowledges four main sub-groups of MPNs: (i) Chronic Myeloid Leukemia; (ii) classical Philadelphia-negative MPNs (Polycythemia Vera; Essential Thrombocythemia; Primary Myelofibrosis); (iii) non-classical Philadelphia-negative MPNs (Chronic Neutrophilic Leukemia; Chronic Eosinophilic Leukemia); and (iv) MPNs, unclassifiable (MPN-U). The latter are currently defined as MPNs with clinical-pathological findings not fulfilling the diagnostic criteria for any other entity. The MPN-U spectrum traditionally encompasses early phase MPNs, terminal (i.e., advanced fibrotic) MPNs, and cases associated with inflammatory or neoplastic disorders that obscure the clinical-histological picture. Several lines of evidence and clinical practice suggest the existence of additional myeloid neoplasms that may expand the spectrum of MPN-U. To gain insight into such disorders, this review addresses the history of MPN classification, the evolution of their diagnostic criteria and the complex clinical-pathological and biological features of MPN-U.