1
|
Kavikondala S, Haeussler K, Wang X, Spellman A, Bausch-Jurken MT, Sharma P, Amiri M, Krivelyova A, Vats S, Nassim M, Kumar N, Van de Velde N. Immunogenicity of mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 in Immunocompromised Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Using GRADE. Infect Dis Ther 2024; 13:1419-1438. [PMID: 38802704 PMCID: PMC11219657 DOI: 10.1007/s40121-024-00987-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2024] [Accepted: 04/30/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Immunocompromised (IC) patients mount poor immune responses to vaccination. Higher-dose coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines may offer increased immunogenicity. METHODS A pairwise meta-analysis of 98 studies reporting comparisons of mRNA-1273 (50 or 100 mcg/dose) and BNT162b2 (30 mcg/dose) in IC adults was performed. Outcomes were seroconversion, total and neutralizing antibody titers, and cellular immune responses. RESULTS mRNA-1273 was associated with a significantly higher seroconversion likelihood [relative risk, 1.11 (95% CI, 1.08, 1.14); P < 0.0001; I2 = 66.8%] and higher total antibody titers [relative increase, 50.45% (95% CI, 34.63%, 66.28%); P < 0.0001; I2 = 89.5%] versus BNT162b2. mRNA-1273 elicited higher but statistically nonsignificant relative increases in neutralizing antibody titers and cellular immune responses versus BNT162b2. CONCLUSION Higher-dose mRNA-1273 had increased immunogenicity versus BNT162b2 in IC patients.
Collapse
|
2
|
Lazar Neto F, Mercadé-Besora N, Raventós B, Pérez-Crespo L, Castro Junior G, Ranzani OT, Duarte-Salles T. Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against severe COVID-19 among patients with cancer in Catalonia, Spain. Nat Commun 2024; 15:5088. [PMID: 38898035 PMCID: PMC11187152 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-49285-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2023] [Accepted: 05/28/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Patients with cancer were excluded from pivotal randomized clinical trials of COVID-19 vaccine products, and available observational evidence on vaccine effectiveness (VE) focused mostly on mild, and not severe COVID-19, which is the ultimate goal of vaccination for high-risk groups. Here, using primary care electronic health records from Catalonia, Spain (SIDIAP), we built two large cohorts of vaccinated and matched control cancer patients with a primary vaccination scheme (n = 184,744) and a booster (n = 108,534). Most patients received a mRNA-based product in primary (76.2%) and booster vaccination (99.9%). Patients had 51.8% (95% CI 40.3%-61.1%) and 58.4% (95% CI 29.3%-75.5%) protection against COVID-19 hospitalization and COVID-19 death respectively after full vaccination (two-doses) and 77.9% (95% CI 69.2%-84.2%) and 80.2% (95% CI 63.0%-89.4%) after booster. Compared to primary vaccination, the booster dose provided higher peak protection during follow-up. Calibration of VE estimates with negative outcomes, and sensitivity analyses with slight different population and COVID-19 outcomes definitions provided similar results. Our results confirm the role of primary and booster COVID-19 vaccination in preventing COVID-19 severe events in patients with cancer and highlight the need for the additional dose in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felippe Lazar Neto
- Pulmonary Division, Heart Institute (InCor), Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
- Serviço de Oncologia Clínica, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP), Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Núria Mercadé-Besora
- Fundació Institut Universitari per a la recerca a l'Atenció Primària de Salut Jordi Gol i Gurina (IDIAPJGol), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Berta Raventós
- Fundació Institut Universitari per a la recerca a l'Atenció Primària de Salut Jordi Gol i Gurina (IDIAPJGol), Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Spain
| | - Laura Pérez-Crespo
- Fundació Institut Universitari per a la recerca a l'Atenció Primària de Salut Jordi Gol i Gurina (IDIAPJGol), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gilberto Castro Junior
- Serviço de Oncologia Clínica, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP), Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Otavio T Ranzani
- Pulmonary Division, Heart Institute (InCor), Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
- ISGlobal, Hospital Clínic-Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Talita Duarte-Salles
- Fundació Institut Universitari per a la recerca a l'Atenció Primària de Salut Jordi Gol i Gurina (IDIAPJGol), Barcelona, Spain.
- Department of Medical Informatics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Laquintana V, Mottini C, Marchesi F, Marcozzi B, Terrenato I, Sperandio E, de Latouliere L, Carrieri F, Pimpinelli F, Pontone M, Pellini R, Campo F, Conti L, Accetta C, Mandoj C, Petrone F, Di Bella O, Vujovic B, Morrone A, Compagnone M, Principato E, Pinto E, Papa E, Falcucci P, La Malfa A, Pallocca M, De Marco F, Piaggio G, Ciliberto G, Mengarelli A, di Martino S. Dynamics of humoral and cellular response to three doses of anti-SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 vaccine in patients with hematological malignancies and older subjects. Front Immunol 2024; 14:1221587. [PMID: 38343436 PMCID: PMC10853639 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1221587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/27/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Few data are available about the durability of the response, the induction of neutralizing antibodies, and the cellular response upon the third dose of the anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine in hemato-oncological patients. Objective To investigate the antibody and cellular response to the BNT162b2 vaccine in patients with hematological malignancy. Methods We measured SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike antibodies, anti-Omicron neutralizing antibodies, and T-cell responses 1 month after the third dose of vaccine in 93 fragile patients with hematological malignancy (FHM), 51 fragile not oncological subjects (FNO) aged 80-92, and 47 employees of the hospital (healthcare workers, (HW), aged 23-66 years. Blood samples were collected at day 0 (T0), 21 (T1), 35 (T2), 84 (T3), 168 (T4), 351 (T pre-3D), and 381 (T post-3D) after the first dose of vaccine. Serum IgG antibodies against S1/S2 antigens of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein were measured at every time point. Neutralizing antibodies were measured at T2, T3 (anti-Alpha), T4 (anti-Delta), and T post-3D (anti-Omicron). T cell response was assessed at T post-3D. Results An increase in anti-S1/S2 antigen antibodies compared to T0 was observed in the three groups at T post-3D. After the third vaccine dose, the median antibody level of FHM subjects was higher than after the second dose and above the putative protection threshold, although lower than in the other groups. The neutralizing activity of antibodies against the Omicron variant of the virus was tested at T2 and T post-3D. 42.3% of FHM, 80,0% of FNO, and 90,0% of HW had anti-Omicron neutralizing antibodies at T post-3D. To get more insight into the breadth of antibody responses, we analyzed neutralizing capacity against BA.4/BA.5, BF.7, BQ.1, XBB.1.5 since also for the Omicron variants, different mutations have been reported especially for the spike protein. The memory T-cell response was lower in FHM than in FNO and HW cohorts. Data on breakthrough infections and deaths suggested that the positivity threshold of the test is protective after the third dose of the vaccine in all cohorts. Conclusion FHM have a relevant response to the BNT162b2 vaccine, with increasing antibody levels after the third dose coupled with, although low, a T-cell response. FHM need repeated vaccine doses to attain a protective immunological response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentina Laquintana
- UOC Anatomy Pathology, Biobank IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Istituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri (IFO), Rome, Italy
| | - Carla Mottini
- UOSD SAFU, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Istituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri (IFO), Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Marchesi
- UOSD Hematology and Stem Cell Transplant Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Istituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri (IFO), Rome, Italy
| | - Benedetta Marcozzi
- UOSD Clinical Trial Center, Biostatistic and Bionformatic, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Istituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri (IFO), Rome, Italy
| | - Irene Terrenato
- UOSD Clinical Trial Center, Biostatistic and Bionformatic, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Istituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri (IFO), Rome, Italy
| | - Eleonora Sperandio
- UOSD Clinical Trial Center, Biostatistic and Bionformatic, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Istituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri (IFO), Rome, Italy
| | - Luisa de Latouliere
- UOSD SAFU, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Istituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri (IFO), Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca Carrieri
- UOC D.I.T.R.A.R. IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Istituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri (IFO), Rome, Italy
| | - Fulvia Pimpinelli
- UOSD of Microbiology and Virology, IRCCS San Gallicano Dermatological Institute, Istituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri (IFO), Rome, Italy
| | - Martina Pontone
- UOSD of Microbiology and Virology, IRCCS San Gallicano Dermatological Institute, Istituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri (IFO), Rome, Italy
| | - Raul Pellini
- UOC Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Istituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri (IFO), Rome, Italy
| | - Flaminia Campo
- UOC Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Istituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri (IFO), Rome, Italy
| | - Laura Conti
- UOSD Clinical Pathology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Istituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri (IFO), Rome, Italy
| | - Celeste Accetta
- UOC Anatomy Pathology, Biobank IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Istituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri (IFO), Rome, Italy
| | - Chiara Mandoj
- UOSD Clinical Pathology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Istituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri (IFO), Rome, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Petrone
- UOC D.I.T.R.A.R. IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Istituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri (IFO), Rome, Italy
| | - Ornella Di Bella
- Medical Direction, Istituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri (IFO), Rome, Italy
| | - Branka Vujovic
- Medical Direction, Istituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri (IFO), Rome, Italy
| | - Aldo Morrone
- Scientific Direction, IRCCS San Gallicano Dermatological Institute, Istituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri (IFO), Rome, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Elena Papa
- UOSD Hematology and Stem Cell Transplant Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Istituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri (IFO), Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Falcucci
- UOSD Hematology and Stem Cell Transplant Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Istituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri (IFO), Rome, Italy
| | - Antonia La Malfa
- Pharmacy Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute and San Gallicano Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Matteo Pallocca
- UOSD Clinical Trial Center, Biostatistic and Bionformatic, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Istituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri (IFO), Rome, Italy
| | - Federico De Marco
- UOSD SAFU, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Istituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri (IFO), Rome, Italy
| | - Giulia Piaggio
- UOSD SAFU, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Istituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri (IFO), Rome, Italy
| | - Gennaro Ciliberto
- Scientific Direction, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Istituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri (IFO), Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Mengarelli
- UOSD Hematology and Stem Cell Transplant Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Istituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri (IFO), Rome, Italy
| | - Simona di Martino
- UOC Anatomy Pathology, Biobank IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Istituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri (IFO), Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Overheu O, Lendowski S, Quast DR, Kühn D, Vidal Blanco E, Kraeft AL, Steinmann E, Kourti E, Lugnier C, Steinmann J, Reinacher-Schick A, Pfaender S. Longitudinal data on humoral response and neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 and subvariants BA.4/5 and BQ.1.1 after COVID-19 vaccination in cancer patients. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:10633-10644. [PMID: 37300723 PMCID: PMC10257184 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-04961-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2023] [Accepted: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant of concern (VOC) and subvariants like BQ.1.1 demonstrate immune evasive potential. Little is known about the efficacy of booster vaccinations regarding this VOC and subvariants in cancer patients. This study is among the first to provide data on neutralizing antibodies (nAb) against BQ.1.1. METHODS Cancer patients at our center were prospectively enrolled between 01/2021 and 02/2022. Medical data and blood samples were collected at enrollment and before and after every SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, at 3 and 6 months. RESULTS We analyzed 408 samples from 148 patients (41% female), mainly with solid tumors (85%) on active therapy (92%; 80% chemotherapy). SARS-CoV-2 IgG and nAb titers decreased over time, however, significantly increased following third vaccination (p < 0.0001). NAb (ND50) against Omicron BA.1 was minimal prior and increased significantly after the third vaccination (p < 0.0001). ND50 titers against BQ.1.1 after the third vaccination were significantly lower than against BA.1 and BA.4/5 (p < 0.0001) and undetectable in half of the patients (48%). Factors associated with impaired immune response were hematologic malignancies, B cell depleting therapy and higher age. Choice of vaccine, sex and treatment with chemo-/immunotherapy did not influence antibody response. Patients with breakthrough infections had significantly lower nAb titers after both 6 months (p < 0.001) and the third vaccination (p = 0.018). CONCLUSION We present the first data on nAb against BQ.1.1 following the third vaccination in cancer patients. Our results highlight the threat that new emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants pose to cancer patients and support efforts to apply repeated vaccines. Since a considerable number of patients did not display an adequate immune response, continuing to exhibit caution remains reasonable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Overheu
- Department of Hematology and Oncology with Palliative Care, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University, Bochum, Germany.
| | - Simon Lendowski
- Department of Hematology and Oncology with Palliative Care, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University, Bochum, Germany
| | - Daniel R Quast
- Department of Internal Medicine, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University, Bochum, Germany
| | - Daniel Kühn
- Department of Molecular and Medical Virology, Ruhr University, Bochum, Germany
| | - Elena Vidal Blanco
- Department of Molecular and Medical Virology, Ruhr University, Bochum, Germany
| | - Anna-Lena Kraeft
- Department of Hematology and Oncology with Palliative Care, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University, Bochum, Germany
| | - Eike Steinmann
- Department of Molecular and Medical Virology, Ruhr University, Bochum, Germany
| | - Eleni Kourti
- Department of Hematology and Oncology with Palliative Care, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University, Bochum, Germany
| | - Celine Lugnier
- Department of Hematology and Oncology with Palliative Care, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University, Bochum, Germany
| | - Joerg Steinmann
- Institute of Clinical Hygiene, Medical Microbiology and Infectiology, Klinikum Nürnberg, Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Anke Reinacher-Schick
- Department of Hematology and Oncology with Palliative Care, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University, Bochum, Germany
| | - Stephanie Pfaender
- Department of Molecular and Medical Virology, Ruhr University, Bochum, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nelli F, Fabbri A, Virtuoso A, Giannarelli D, Giron Berrios JR, Marrucci E, Fiore C, Schirripa M, Signorelli C, Chilelli MG, Primi F, Pessina G, Natoni F, Silvestri MA, Ruggeri EM. Effects of Antibody Response after Booster Vaccination on SARS-CoV-2 Breakthrough Infections and Disease Outcomes in Advanced Cancer Patients: A Prospective Analysis of the Vax-on-Third Study. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:5103-5115. [PMID: 37232844 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30050386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2023] [Revised: 05/13/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: The clinical implications of COVID-19 outbreaks following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in immunocompromised recipients are a worldwide concern. Cancer patients on active treatment remain at an increased risk of developing breakthrough infections because of waning immunity and the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants. There is a paucity of data on the effects of COVID-19 outbreaks on long-term survival outcomes in this population. (2) Methods: We enrolled 230 cancer patients who were on active treatment for advanced disease and had received booster dosing of an mRNA-BNT162b2 vaccine as part of the Vax-On-Third trial between September 2021 and October 2021. Four weeks after the third immunization, IgG antibodies against the spike receptor domain of SARS-CoV-2 were tested in all patients. We prospectively evaluated the incidence of breakthrough infections and disease outcomes. The coprimary endpoints were the effects of antibody titers on the development of breakthrough infections and the impact of COVID-19 outbreaks on cancer treatment failure. (3) Results: At a median follow-up of 16.3 months (95% CI 14.5-17.0), 85 (37%) patients developed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Hospitalization was required in 11 patients (12.9%) and only 2 (2.3%) deaths related to COVID-19 outbreaks were observed. Median antibody titers were significantly lower in breakthrough cases than in non-cases (291 BAU/mL (95% CI 210-505) vs. 2798 BAU/mL (95% CI 2323-3613), p < 0.001). A serological titer cut-off below 803 BAU/mL was predictive of breakthrough infection. In multivariate testing, antibody titers and cytotoxic chemotherapy were independently associated with an increased risk of outbreaks. Time-to-treatment failure after booster dosing was significantly shorter in patients who contracted SARS-CoV-2 infection (3.1 months (95% CI 2.3-3.6) vs. 16.2 months (95% CI 14.3-17.0), p < 0.001) and had an antibody level below the cut-off (3.6 months (95% CI 3.0-4.5) vs. 14.6 months (95% CI 11.9-16.3), p < 0.001). A multivariate Cox regression model confirmed that both covariates independently had a worsening effect on time-to-treatment failure. (4) Conclusions: These data support the role of vaccine boosters in preventing the incidence and severity of COVID-19 outbreaks. Enhanced humoral immunity after the third vaccination significantly correlates with protection against breakthrough infections. Strategies aimed at restraining SARS-CoV-2 transmission in advanced cancer patients undergoing active treatment should be prioritized to mitigate the impact on disease outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabrizio Nelli
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Medical Oncology Unit, Central Hospital of Belcolle, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
| | - Agnese Fabbri
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Medical Oncology Unit, Central Hospital of Belcolle, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
| | - Antonella Virtuoso
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Medical Oncology Unit, Central Hospital of Belcolle, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
| | - Diana Giannarelli
- Biostatistics Unit, Scientific Directorate, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Julio Rodrigo Giron Berrios
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Medical Oncology Unit, Central Hospital of Belcolle, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
| | - Eleonora Marrucci
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Medical Oncology Unit, Central Hospital of Belcolle, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
| | - Cristina Fiore
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Medical Oncology Unit, Central Hospital of Belcolle, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
| | - Marta Schirripa
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Medical Oncology Unit, Central Hospital of Belcolle, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
| | - Carlo Signorelli
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Medical Oncology Unit, Central Hospital of Belcolle, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
| | - Mario Giovanni Chilelli
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Medical Oncology Unit, Central Hospital of Belcolle, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
| | - Francesca Primi
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Medical Oncology Unit, Central Hospital of Belcolle, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
| | - Gloria Pessina
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Molecular Biology and Covid Diagnostics, Central Hospital of Belcolle, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
| | - Federica Natoni
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Molecular Biology and Covid Diagnostics, Central Hospital of Belcolle, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
| | - Maria Assunta Silvestri
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Microbiology and Virology Unit, Central Hospital of Belcolle, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
| | - Enzo Maria Ruggeri
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Medical Oncology Unit, Central Hospital of Belcolle, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Błaszczuk A, Sikora D, Kiś J, Stępień E, Drop B, Polz-Dacewicz M. Humoral Response after SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in Prostate Cancer Patients. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:vaccines11040770. [PMID: 37112682 PMCID: PMC10144447 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11040770] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2023] [Revised: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 04/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Cancer is an important public health problem. Prostate cancer is one of the most common cancers among men. In Poland, the incidence of this type of cancer is constantly growing. Considering the appearance of a new coronavirus in December 2019 (SARS-CoV-2) and the fact that oncology patients, including those with prostate cancer, are particularly vulnerable to infection, it is recommended to get vaccinated against COVID-19. In our study, we determined the level and prevalence of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 IgG in patients with prostate cancer compared to the control group and whether the patients’ ages affected the level of antibodies. PCa patients and controls were divided into two age groups: 50–59 years and 60–70 years. We also analyzed the level of antibodies in patients belonging to the relevant risk groups for prostate cancer (the European Society of Urology risk group classification of prostate cancer). For the study, we used the Microblot-Array COVID-19 IgG test to detect antibodies against the three main SARS-CoV-2 antigens: NCP, RBD, and S2. Our results showed that prostate cancer patients had significantly lower levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies compared to controls. In addition, age also affected the decrease in the number of IgG antibodies. The level of antibodies in the intermediate/high-risk group was lower compared to the low-risk group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agata Błaszczuk
- SARS Laboratory, Department of Virology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland
| | - Dominika Sikora
- SARS Laboratory, Department of Virology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland
| | - Jacek Kiś
- 1st Clinical Military Hospital with Outpatient Clinic in Lublin, 20-049 Lublin, Poland
| | - Ewa Stępień
- SARS Laboratory, Department of Virology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland
| | - Bartłomiej Drop
- Department of Computer Science and Medical Statistics with the e-Health Laboratory, Medical University of Lublin, 20-090 Lublin, Poland
| | | |
Collapse
|