Multiple Testing, Cut-Point Optimization, and Signs of Publication Bias in Prognostic FDG-PET Imaging Studies of Head and Neck and Lung Cancer: A Review and Meta-Analysis

Comparing the Diagnostic Value of FDG PET or PET/CT With FDG PET/MR in Inflammatory Bowel Disease-A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic value of 18 F-FDG PET or PET/CT with FDG PET/MR in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

METHODS

A comprehensive search was performed in PubMed for studies reporting the diagnostic performance of FDG PET (PET/CT) and FDG PET/MR in IBD from the inception of the database to March 14, 2024, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Fourteen studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Pooled estimates of segment-based sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio for FDG PET (PET/CT) and FDG PET/MR were calculated alongside 95% confidence intervals. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves were plotted, and the area under the SROC curve was determined alongside the Q * index.

RESULTS

The segment-based pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, and area under the SROC curve of FDG PET (PET/CT) for diagnosing IBD (9 studies) were 0.81, 0.86, 5.76, 0.22, 31.92, and 0.92, respectively. Those of FDG PET/MR (5 studies) were 0.78, 0.92, 10.97, 0.25, 51.79, and 0.95. There was no significant difference in the abilities of detecting or excluding IBD between FDG PET (PET/CT) and FDG PET/MR.

CONCLUSIONS

For diagnostic value in patients with IBD, there was no significant difference between FDG PET (PET/CT) and FDG PET/MR. Both FDG PET (PET/CT) and FDG PET/MR have demonstrated high diagnostic performance for accurate diagnosing in patients with IBD.

Prognostic Value of Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator Receptor PET/CT in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas and Comparison with 18F-FDG PET/CT: A Single-Center Prospective Study

The aim of this phase II clinical trial (NCT02965001) was to evaluate the prognostic value of urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) PET/CT with the novel ligand ⁶⁸Ga-NOTA-AE105 in head and neck cancer and compare it with ¹⁸F-FDG. Methods: Patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma referred for curatively intended radiotherapy were eligible and prospectively included in this study. ⁶⁸Ga-uPAR and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT were performed before initiation of curatively intended radiotherapy, and the SUV_max of the primary tumor was measured on both PET/CT studies by 2 independent readers. Relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated, and optimal cutoffs were established for ⁶⁸Ga-uPAR and ¹⁸F-FDG PET independently and compared using log rank and Kaplan-Meier statistics, as well as univariate and multivariate analysis in a Cox proportional-hazards model. Results: In total, 57 patients were included and followed for a median of 33.8 mo (range, 2.30-47.2, mo). The median SUV_max of the primary tumors was 2.98 (range, 1.94-5.24) for ⁶⁸Ga-uPAR and 15.7 (range, 4.24-45.5) for ¹⁸F-FDG. The optimal cutoffs for ⁶⁸Ga-NOTA-AE105 SUV_max in the primary tumor were 2.63 for RFS and 2.66 for OS. A high uptake of ⁶⁸Ga-NOTA-AE105 (SUV_max above cutoff) was significantly associated with poor RFS and OS (log-rank P = 0.012 and P = 0.022). ⁶⁸Ga-NOTA-AE105 uptake in the primary tumor was significantly associated with poor RFS in univariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR], 8.53 [95% CI, 1.12-64.7]; P = 0.038), and borderline-associated with OS (HR, 7.44 [95% CI, 0.98-56.4]; P = 0.052). For ¹⁸F-FDG PET, the optimal cutoffs were 22.7 for RFS and 22.9 for OS. An ¹⁸F-FDG SUV_max above the cutoff was significantly associated with reduced RFS (log-rank P = 0.012) and OS (log-rank P = 0.000). ¹⁸F-FDG uptake was significantly associated with reduced RFS (HR, 3.27 [95% CI, 1.237-8.66]; P = 0.017) and OS (HR, 7.10 [95% CI, 2.60-19.4]; P < 0.001) in univariate analysis. In a multivariate analysis including ⁶⁸Ga-uPAR SUV_max, ¹⁸F-FDG SUV_max, TNM stage, and p16 status, only ⁶⁸Ga-uPAR SUV_max remained significant (HR, 8.51 [95% CI, 1.08-66.9]; P = 0.042) for RFS. For OS, only TNM stage and ¹⁸F-FDG remained significant. Conclusion: The current trial showed promising results for the use of ⁶⁸Ga-uPAR PET SUV_max in the primary tumor to predict RFS in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients referred for curatively intended radiotherapy when compared with ¹⁸F-FDG PET, TNM stage, and p16 status. ⁶⁸Ga-uPAR PET could potentially become valuable for identification of patients suited for deescalation of treatment and risk-stratified follow-up schemes.

18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography of Head and Neck Cancer: Location and HPV Specific Parameters for Potential Treatment Individualization

Purpose

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) is utilized for staging and treatment planning of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC). Some older publications on the prognostic relevance showed inconclusive results, most probably due to small study sizes. This study evaluates the prognostic and potentially predictive value of FDG-PET in a large multi-center analysis.

Methods

Original analysis of individual FDG-PET and patient data from 16 international centers (8 institutional datasets, 8 public repositories) with 1104 patients. All patients received curative intent radiotherapy/chemoradiation (CRT) and pre-treatment FDG-PET imaging. Primary tumors were semi-automatically delineated for calculation of SUV_max, SUV_mean, metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG). Cox regression analyses were performed for event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), loco-regional control (LRC) and freedom from distant metastases (FFDM).

Results

FDG-PET parameters were associated with patient outcome in the whole cohort regarding clinical endpoints (EFS, OS, LRC, FFDM), in uni- and multivariate Cox regression analyses. Several previously published cut-off values were successfully validated. Subgroup analyses identified tumor- and human papillomavirus (HPV) specific parameters. In HPV positive oropharynx cancer (OPC) SUV_max was well suited to identify patients with excellent LRC for organ preservation. Patients with SUV_max of 14 or less were unlikely to develop loco-regional recurrence after definitive CRT. In contrast FDG PET parameters deliver only limited prognostic information in laryngeal cancer.

Conclusion

FDG-PET parameters bear considerable prognostic value in HNSCC and potential predictive value in subgroups of patients, especially regarding treatment de-intensification and organ-preservation. The potential predictive value needs further validation in appropriate control groups. Further research on advanced imaging approaches including radiomics or artificial intelligence methods should implement the identified cut-off values as benchmark routine imaging parameters.