1
|
Thiel TA, Valentin B, Ullrich T, Boschheidgen M, Schimmöller L, Benkert T, Al‐Monajjed R, Ljimani A, Antoch G, Jasse J, Bechler E, Wittsack H. Spectral Diffusion Analysis in Patients With High Risk for Prostate Cancer: A Feasibility Study. J Magn Reson Imaging 2025; 61:512-515. [PMID: 38581176 PMCID: PMC11645486 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.29354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2024] [Revised: 03/04/2024] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 04/08/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas A. Thiel
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional RadiologyMedical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich‐Heine‐University DüsseldorfDüsseldorfGermany
| | - Birte Valentin
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional RadiologyMedical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich‐Heine‐University DüsseldorfDüsseldorfGermany
| | - Tim Ullrich
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional RadiologyMedical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich‐Heine‐University DüsseldorfDüsseldorfGermany
| | - Matthias Boschheidgen
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional RadiologyMedical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich‐Heine‐University DüsseldorfDüsseldorfGermany
| | - Lars Schimmöller
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional RadiologyMedical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich‐Heine‐University DüsseldorfDüsseldorfGermany
- Department of Diagnostic, Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Marien Hospital HerneUniversity Hospital of the Ruhr‐University BochumHerneGermany
| | - Thomas Benkert
- MR Application DevelopmentSiemens Healthineers AGErlangenGermany
| | - Rouvier Al‐Monajjed
- Department of Urology, Medical FacultyUniversity of DüsseldorfDüsseldorfGermany
| | - Alexandra Ljimani
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional RadiologyMedical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich‐Heine‐University DüsseldorfDüsseldorfGermany
| | - Gerald Antoch
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional RadiologyMedical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich‐Heine‐University DüsseldorfDüsseldorfGermany
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Clinical OncologyUniversity Hospital Düsseldorf, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne (CIO ABCD)DüsseldorfGermany
| | - Jonas Jasse
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional RadiologyMedical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich‐Heine‐University DüsseldorfDüsseldorfGermany
| | - Eric Bechler
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional RadiologyMedical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich‐Heine‐University DüsseldorfDüsseldorfGermany
- Core Facility for Magnetic Resonance ImagingMedical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich‐Heine‐University DüsseldorfDüsseldorfGermany
| | - Hans‐Jörg Wittsack
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional RadiologyMedical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich‐Heine‐University DüsseldorfDüsseldorfGermany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jamshidi MH, Fatemi A, Karami A, Ghanavati S, Dhruba DD, Negarestanian MH. Optimizing Multiparametric MRI Protocols for Prostate Cancer Detection: A Comprehensive Assessment Aligned with PI-RADS Guidelines. Health Sci Rep 2024; 7:e70172. [PMID: 39564352 PMCID: PMC11574457 DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.70172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2024] [Revised: 09/11/2024] [Accepted: 10/10/2024] [Indexed: 11/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and Aim Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is recognized as the most indicative method for diagnosing prostate cancer. The purpose of this narrative review is to provide a comprehensive evaluation aligned with the Prostate Imaging and Reporting Data System (PI-RADS) guidelines, offering an in-depth insight into the various MRI sequences used in a standard mpMRI protocol. Additionally, it outlines the critical technical requirements necessary to perform a standard mpMRI examination of the prostate, as defined by the PI-RADS specifications. Methods European Society of Urogenital Radiology has released PI-RADS guideline detailing its suggestions aimed at improving the standards of the procedure. The purpose of this guideline is to establish a standard strategy for MRI protocols and image interpretation, aiming to prevent variability in each of the imaging and interpretation stages. Results A standard mpMRI protocol comprises morphological sequences and functional sequences. Morphological sequences which encompass T1- and T2-weighted images, and various functional sequences include diffusion-weighted imaging, and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. The PI-RADS recommendations assert that having a standard and uniform protocol for all MRI centers is imperative. Furthermore, the existence of a standardized checklist for interpreting MRI images can foster greater consensus in the process of diagnosing and treating patients. Conclusion Standardized protocols and checklists for mpMRI interpretation are essential for achieving greater consensus among radiologists, ultimately leading to improved diagnostic outcomes in prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad Hossein Jamshidi
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, School of Allied Medical Sciences Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences Ahvaz Iran
| | - Ali Fatemi
- Department of Physics Jackson State University Jackson Mississippi USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology Gamma Knife Center Jackson Mississippi USA
| | - Aida Karami
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, School of Allied Medical Sciences Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences Ahvaz Iran
| | - Sepehr Ghanavati
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences Ahvaz Iran
| | - Durjoy D Dhruba
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Iowa Iowa City Iowa USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhang Z, Aygun E, Shih SF, Raman SS, Sung K, Wu HH. High-resolution prostate diffusion MRI using eddy current-nulled convex optimized diffusion encoding and random matrix theory-based denoising. MAGMA (NEW YORK, N.Y.) 2024; 37:603-619. [PMID: 38349453 PMCID: PMC11323217 DOI: 10.1007/s10334-024-01147-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2023] [Revised: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 02/17/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop and evaluate a technique combining eddy current-nulled convex optimized diffusion encoding (ENCODE) with random matrix theory (RMT)-based denoising to accelerate and improve the apparent signal-to-noise ratio (aSNR) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping in high-resolution prostate diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven subjects with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer were scanned at 3T with high-resolution (HR) (in-plane: 1.0 × 1.0 mm2) ENCODE and standard-resolution (1.6 × 2.2 mm2) bipolar DWI sequences (both had 7 repetitions for averaging, acquisition time [TA] of 5 min 50 s). HR-ENCODE was retrospectively analyzed using three repetitions (accelerated effective TA of 2 min 30 s). The RMT-based denoising pipeline utilized complex DWI signals and Marchenko-Pastur distribution-based principal component analysis to remove additive Gaussian noise in images from multiple coils, b-values, diffusion encoding directions, and repetitions. HR-ENCODE with RMT-based denoising (HR-ENCODE-RMT) was compared with HR-ENCODE in terms of aSNR in prostate peripheral zone (PZ) and transition zone (TZ). Precision and accuracy of ADC were evaluated by the coefficient of variation (CoV) between repeated measurements and mean difference (MD) compared to the bipolar ADC reference, respectively. Differences were compared using two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank tests (P < 0.05 considered significant). RESULTS HR-ENCODE-RMT yielded 62% and 56% higher median aSNR than HR-ENCODE (b = 800 s/mm2) in PZ and TZ, respectively (P < 0.001). HR-ENCODE-RMT achieved 63% and 70% lower ADC-CoV than HR-ENCODE in PZ and TZ, respectively (P < 0.001). HR-ENCODE-RMT ADC and bipolar ADC had low MD of 22.7 × 10-6 mm2/s in PZ and low MD of 90.5 × 10-6 mm2/s in TZ. CONCLUSIONS HR-ENCODE-RMT can shorten the acquisition time and improve the aSNR of high-resolution prostate DWI and achieve accurate and precise ADC measurements in the prostate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhaohuan Zhang
- Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, 300 UCLA Medical Plaza, Suite B119, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Elif Aygun
- Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, 300 UCLA Medical Plaza, Suite B119, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Shu-Fu Shih
- Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, 300 UCLA Medical Plaza, Suite B119, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Steven S Raman
- Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, 300 UCLA Medical Plaza, Suite B119, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA
| | - Kyunghyun Sung
- Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, 300 UCLA Medical Plaza, Suite B119, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Holden H Wu
- Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, 300 UCLA Medical Plaza, Suite B119, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
- Department of Bioengineering, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Enríquez-Mier-Y-Terán FE, Chatterjee A, Antic T, Oto A, Karczmar G, Bourne R. Multi-model sequential analysis of MRI data for microstructure prediction in heterogeneous tissue. Sci Rep 2023; 13:16486. [PMID: 37779137 PMCID: PMC10543593 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-43329-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023] Open
Abstract
We propose a general method for combining multiple models to predict tissue microstructure, with an exemplar using in vivo diffusion-relaxation MRI data. The proposed method obviates the need to select a single 'optimum' structure model for data analysis in heterogeneous tissues where the best model varies according to local environment. We break signal interpretation into a three-stage sequence: (1) application of multiple semi-phenomenological models to predict the physical properties of tissue water pools contributing to the observed signal; (2) from each Stage-1 semi-phenomenological model, application of a tissue microstructure model to predict the relative volumes of tissue structure components that make up each water pool; and (3) aggregation of the predictions of tissue structure, with weightings based on model likelihood and fractional volumes of the water pools from Stage-1. The multiple model approach is expected to reduce prediction variance in tissue regions where a complex model is overparameterised, and bias where a model is underparameterised. The separation of signal characterisation (Stage-1) from biological assignment (Stage-2) enables alternative biological interpretations of the observed physical properties of the system, by application of different tissue structure models. The proposed method is exemplified with human prostate diffusion-relaxation MRI data, but has potential application to a wide range of analyses where a single model may not be optimal throughout the sampled domain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francisco E Enríquez-Mier-Y-Terán
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, 2008, Australia
- The Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, 2050, Australia
| | - Aritrick Chatterjee
- Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, MC 2026, Chicago, 60637, IL, USA
- Sanford J. Grossman Center of Excellence in Prostate Imaging and Image Guided Therapy, University of Chicago, Chicago, 60637, IL, USA
| | - Tatjana Antic
- Department of Pathology, University of Chicago, Chicago, 60637, IL, USA
| | - Aytekin Oto
- Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, MC 2026, Chicago, 60637, IL, USA
| | - Gregory Karczmar
- Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, MC 2026, Chicago, 60637, IL, USA
| | - Roger Bourne
- Discipline of Medical Imaging Science, Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, 2006, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kim EH, Andriole GL. Should men undergo MRI before prostate biopsy - CON. Urol Oncol 2023; 41:92-95. [PMID: 34602360 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2021] [Accepted: 08/06/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used prior to biopsy in response to the overdiagnosis and overtreatment of prostate cancer (CaP) associated with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) based screening. However, technical limitations in the conventional diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences as well as the high degree of radiologist-to-radiologist variability in interpreting prostate MRI result in inadequate accuracy. Specifically, the insufficient negative predictive value (NPV) of prostate MRI (76%-87%) does not allow biopsy to be omitted in the negative MRI setting. Additionally, the variable, and relatively low positive predictive value (PPV) of MRI (27%-44%) provides only an incremental improvement in risk prediction compared to readily available clinical tools such as the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial risk calculator. This small benefit is likely confined to the minority of patients with positive MRI findings in a typically under-sampled region of the prostate (e.g., anterior lesions), which may be obviated by newer biopsy approaches and tools such as transperineal prostate biopsy and micro-ultrasound technology. With these considerations in mind, pre-biopsy prostate MRI in its current form is unlikely to provide a clinically significant benefit, and should not be considered as routine practice until its accuracy is sufficiently improved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric H Kim
- Division of Urologic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Gerald L Andriole
- Division of Urologic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rezaeijo SM, Entezari Zarch H, Mojtahedi H, Chegeni N, Danyaei A. Feasibility Study of Synthetic DW-MR Images with Different b Values Compared with Real DW-MR Images: Quantitative Assessment of Three Models Based-Deep Learning Including CycleGAN, Pix2PiX, and DC2Anet. APPLIED MAGNETIC RESONANCE 2022; 53:1407-1429. [DOI: 10.1007/s00723-022-01482-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2022] [Revised: 04/21/2022] [Accepted: 05/18/2022] [Indexed: 07/26/2023]
|
7
|
Sen S, Valindria V, Slator PJ, Pye H, Grey A, Freeman A, Moore C, Whitaker H, Punwani S, Singh S, Panagiotaki E. Differentiating False Positive Lesions from Clinically Significant Cancer and Normal Prostate Tissue Using VERDICT MRI and Other Diffusion Models. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:1631. [PMID: 35885536 PMCID: PMC9319485 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12071631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2022] [Revised: 06/29/2022] [Accepted: 07/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
False positives on multiparametric MRIs (mp-MRIs) result in many unnecessary invasive biopsies in men with clinically insignificant diseases. This study investigated whether quantitative diffusion MRI could differentiate between false positives, true positives and normal tissue non-invasively. Thirty-eight patients underwent mp-MRI and Vascular, Extracellular and Restricted Diffusion for Cytometry in Tumors (VERDICT) MRI, followed by transperineal biopsy. The patients were categorized into two groups following biopsy: (1) significant cancer—true positive, 19 patients; (2) atrophy/inflammation/high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN)—false positive, 19 patients. The clinical apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were obtained, and the intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM), diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) and VERDICT models were fitted via deep learning. Significant differences (p < 0.05) between true positive and false positive lesions were found in ADC, IVIM perfusion fraction (f) and diffusivity (D), DKI diffusivity (DK) (p < 0.0001) and kurtosis (K) and VERDICT intracellular volume fraction (fIC), extracellular−extravascular volume fraction (fEES) and diffusivity (dEES) values. Significant differences between false positives and normal tissue were found for the VERDICT fIC (p = 0.004) and IVIM D. These results demonstrate that model-based diffusion MRI could reduce unnecessary biopsies occurring due to false positive prostate lesions and shows promising sensitivity to benign diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Snigdha Sen
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK; (S.S.); (V.V.); (P.J.S.)
| | - Vanya Valindria
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK; (S.S.); (V.V.); (P.J.S.)
| | - Paddy J. Slator
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK; (S.S.); (V.V.); (P.J.S.)
| | - Hayley Pye
- Molecular Diagnostics and Therapeutics Group, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK; (H.P.); (H.W.)
| | - Alistair Grey
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundations Trust, London NW1 2PG, UK; (A.G.); (C.M.)
| | - Alex Freeman
- Department of Pathology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundations Trust, London NW1 2PG, UK;
| | - Caroline Moore
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundations Trust, London NW1 2PG, UK; (A.G.); (C.M.)
| | - Hayley Whitaker
- Molecular Diagnostics and Therapeutics Group, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK; (H.P.); (H.W.)
| | - Shonit Punwani
- Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK; (S.P.); (S.S.)
| | - Saurabh Singh
- Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK; (S.P.); (S.S.)
| | - Eleftheria Panagiotaki
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK; (S.S.); (V.V.); (P.J.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Greenberg JW, Koller CR, Casado C, Triche BL, Krane LS. A narrative review of biparametric MRI (bpMRI) implementation on screening, detection, and the overall accuracy for prostate cancer. Ther Adv Urol 2022; 14:17562872221096377. [PMID: 35531364 PMCID: PMC9073105 DOI: 10.1177/17562872221096377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2021] [Accepted: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy in American men following skin cancer, with approximately one in eight men being diagnosed during their lifetime. Over the past several decades, the treatment of prostate cancer has evolved rapidly, so too has screening. Since the mid-2010s, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided biopsies or 'targeted biopsies' has been a rapidly growing topic of clinical research within the field of urologic oncology. The aim of this publication is to provide a review of biparametric MRI (bpMRI) utilization for the diagnosis of prostate cancer and a comparison to multiparametric MRI (mpMRI). Through single-centered studies and meta-analysis across all identified pertinent published literature, bpMRI is an effective tool for the screening and diagnosis of prostate cancer. When compared with the diagnostic accuracy of mpMRI, bpMRI identifies prostate cancer at comparable rates. In addition, when omitting dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) protocol to the MRI, patients incur reduced costs and shorter imaging time while providers can offer more tests to their patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob W. Greenberg
- Department of Urology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | | | - Crystal Casado
- Department of Urology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Benjamin L. Triche
- Department of Radiology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - L. Spencer Krane
- Southeastern Louisiana Veterans Health Care System, 2400 Canal St., New Orleans, LA 70119, USA
- Department of Urology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Chatterjee A, Mercado C, Bourne RM, Yousuf A, Hess B, Antic T, Eggener S, Oto A, Karczmar GS. Validation of Prostate Tissue Composition by Using Hybrid Multidimensional MRI: Correlation with Histologic Findings. Radiology 2021; 302:368-377. [PMID: 34751615 PMCID: PMC8805656 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2021204459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Background Tissue estimates obtained by using microstructure imaging techniques, such as hybrid multidimensional (HM) MRI, may improve prostate cancer diagnosis but require histologic validation. Purpose To validate prostate tissue composition measured by using HM MRI, with quantitative histologic evaluation from whole-mount prostatectomy as the reference standard. Materials and Methods In this HIPAA-compliant study, from December 2016 to July 2018, prospective participants with biopsy-confirmed prostate cancer underwent 3-T MRI before radical prostatectomy. Axial HM MRI was performed with all combinations of echo times (57, 70, 150, and 200 msec) and b values (0, 150, 750, and 1500 sec/mm2). Data were fitted by using a three-compartment signal model to generate volumes for each tissue component (stroma, epithelium, lumen). Quantitative histologic evaluation was performed to calculate volume fractions for each tissue component for regions of interest corresponding to MRI. Tissue composition measured by using HM MRI and quantitative histologic evaluation were compared (paired t test) and correlated (Pearson correlation coefficient), and agreement (concordance correlation) was assessed. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for cancer diagnosis was performed. Results Twenty-five participants (mean age, 60 years ± 7 [standard deviation]; 30 cancers and 45 benign regions of interest) were included. Prostate tissue composition measured with HM MRI and quantitative histologic evaluation did not differ (stroma, 45% ± 11 vs 44% ± 11 [P = .23]; epithelium, 31% ± 15 vs 34% ± 15 [P = .08]; and lumen, 24% ± 13 vs 22% ± 11 [P = .80]). Between HM MRI and histologic evaluation, there was excellent correlation (Pearson r: overall, 0.91; stroma, 0.82; epithelium, 0.93; lumen, 0.90 [all P < .05]) and agreement (concordance correlation coefficient: overall, 0.91; stroma, 0.81; epithelium, 0.90; and lumen, 0.87). High areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve obtained with HM MRI (0.96 for epithelium and 0.94 for lumen, P < .001) and histologic evaluation (0.94 for epithelium and 0.88 for lumen, P < .001) were found for differentiation between benign tissue and prostate cancer. Conclusion Tissue composition measured by using hybrid multidimensional MRI had excellent correlation with quantitative histologic evaluation as the reference standard. © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Muglia in this issue.
Collapse
|
10
|
Jambor I, Martini A, Falagario UG, Ettala O, Taimen P, Knaapila J, Syvänen KT, Steiner A, Verho J, Perez IM, Merisaari H, Vainio P, Lamminen T, Saunavaara J, Carrieri G, Boström PJ, Aronen HJ. How to read biparametric MRI in men with a clinical suspicious of prostate cancer: Pictorial review for beginners with public access to imaging, clinical and histopathological database. Acta Radiol Open 2021; 10:20584601211060707. [PMID: 34868663 PMCID: PMC8638086 DOI: 10.1177/20584601211060707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2021] [Accepted: 11/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is increasingly being used in men with a clinical suspicion of prostate cancer (PCa). Performing prostate MRI without the use of an intravenous contrast (IV) agent in men with a clinical suspicion of PCa can lead to reduced MRI scan time. Enabling a large array of different medical providers (from mid-level to specialized radiologists) to evaluate and potentially report prostate MRI in men with a clinical suspicion of PCa with a high accuracy could be one way to enable wide adoption of prostate MRI in men with a clinical suspicion of PCa. The aim of this pictorial review is to provide an insight into acquisition, quality control and reporting of prostate MRI performed without IV contrast agent in men with a clinical suspicion of PCa, aimed specifically at radiologists starting reporting prostate MRI, urologists, urology/radiology residents and mid-level medical providers without experience in reporting prostate MRI. Free public access (http://petiv.utu.fi/improd/and http://petiv.utu.fi/multiimprod/) to complete datasets of 161 and 338 men is provided. The imaging datasets are accompanied by clinical, laboratory and histopathological findings. Several topics are simplified in order to provide a solid base for the development of skills needed for an unsupervised review and potential reporting of prostate MRI in men with a clinical suspicion of PCa. The current review represents the first step towards enabling a large array of different medical providers to review and report accurately prostate MRI performed without IV contrast agent in men with a clinical suspicion of PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivan Jambor
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
- Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount
Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alberto Martini
- Department of Oncology/Unit of
Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS
Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Ugo G Falagario
- Department of Urology and Organ
Transplantation, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Otto Ettala
- Department of Urology, University of Turku and Turku
University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Pekka Taimen
- Institute of Biomedicine, University of Turku and Department of
Pathology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Juha Knaapila
- Department of Urology, University of Turku and Turku
University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Kari T Syvänen
- Department of Urology, University of Turku and Turku
University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Aida Steiner
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
- Medical Imaging Centre of Southwest
Finland, Turku University
Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Janne Verho
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
- Medical Imaging Centre of Southwest
Finland, Turku University
Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Ileana M Perez
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
- Turku Brain and Mind Center, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Harri Merisaari
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
- Turku Brain and Mind Center, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Paula Vainio
- Institute of Biomedicine, University of Turku and Department of
Pathology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Tarja Lamminen
- Department of Urology and Organ
Transplantation, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Jani Saunavaara
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
- Department of Medical Physics, Turku University
Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Giuseppe Carrieri
- Department of Urology and Organ
Transplantation, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Peter J Boström
- Department of Urology, University of Turku and Turku
University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Hannu J Aronen
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
- Department of Oncology/Unit of
Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS
Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gholizadeh N, Greer PB, Simpson J, Goodwin J, Fu C, Lau P, Siddique S, Heerschap A, Ramadan S. Diagnosis of transition zone prostate cancer by multiparametric MRI: added value of MR spectroscopic imaging with sLASER volume selection. J Biomed Sci 2021; 28:54. [PMID: 34281540 PMCID: PMC8290561 DOI: 10.1186/s12929-021-00750-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Accepted: 07/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Current multiparametric MRI (mp-MRI) in routine clinical practice has poor-to-moderate diagnostic performance for transition zone prostate cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential diagnostic performance of novel 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) using a semi-localized adiabatic selective refocusing (sLASER) sequence with gradient offset independent adiabaticity (GOIA) pulses in addition to the routine mp-MRI, including T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and quantitative dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE) for transition zone prostate cancer detection, localization and grading. Methods Forty-one transition zone prostate cancer patients underwent mp-MRI with an external phased-array coil. Normal and cancer regions were delineated by two radiologists and divided into low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk categories based on TRUS guided biopsy results. Support vector machine models were built using different clinically applicable combinations of T2WI, DWI, DCE, and MRSI. The diagnostic performance of each model in cancer detection was evaluated using the area under curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic diagram. Then accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of each model were calculated. Furthermore, the correlation of mp-MRI parameters with low-risk, intermediate-risk and high-risk cancers were calculated using the Spearman correlation coefficient. Results The addition of MRSI to T2WI + DWI and T2WI + DWI + DCE improved the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity for cancer detection. The best performance was achieved with T2WI + DWI + MRSI where the addition of MRSI improved the AUC, accuracy, sensitivity and specificity from 0.86 to 0.99, 0.83 to 0.96, 0.80 to 0.95, and 0.85 to 0.97 respectively. The (choline + spermine + creatine)/citrate ratio of MRSI showed the highest correlation with cancer risk groups (r = 0.64, p < 0.01). Conclusion The inclusion of GOIA-sLASER MRSI into conventional mp-MRI significantly improves the diagnostic accuracy of the detection and aggressiveness assessment of transition zone prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neda Gholizadeh
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Peter B Greer
- School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.,Calvary Mater Newcastle, Radiation Oncology Department, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - John Simpson
- School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.,Calvary Mater Newcastle, Radiation Oncology Department, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Jonathan Goodwin
- School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.,Calvary Mater Newcastle, Radiation Oncology Department, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Caixia Fu
- MR Application Development, Siemens Shenzhen Magnetic Resonance Ltd., Shenzhen, China
| | - Peter Lau
- Radiology Department, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute (HMRI) Imaging Centre, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
| | - Saabir Siddique
- Radiology Department, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute (HMRI) Imaging Centre, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
| | - Arend Heerschap
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Saadallah Ramadan
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia. .,Hunter Medical Research Institute (HMRI) Imaging Centre, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wichtmann BD, Zöllner FG, Attenberger UI, Schönberg SO. Multiparametric MRI in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: Physical Foundations, Limitations, and Prospective Advances of Diffusion-Weighted MRI. ROFO-FORTSCHR RONTG 2020; 193:399-409. [PMID: 33302312 DOI: 10.1055/a-1276-1773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is an essential component of the multiparametric MRI exam for the diagnosis and assessment of prostate cancer (PCa). Over the last two decades, various models have been developed to quantitatively correlate the DWI signal with microstructural characteristics of prostate tissue. The simplest approach (ADC: apparent diffusion coefficient) - currently established as the clinical standard - describes monoexponential decay of the DWI signal. While numerous studies have shown an inverse correlation of ADC values with the Gleason score, the ADC model lacks specificity and is based on water diffusion dynamics that are not true in human tissue. This article aims to explain the biophysical limitations of the standard DWI model and to discuss the potential of more complex, advanced DWI models. METHODS This article is a review based on a selective literature review. RESULTS Four phenomenological DWI models are introduced: diffusion tensor imaging, intravoxel incoherent motion, biexponential model, and diffusion kurtosis imaging. Their parameters may potentially improve PCa diagnostics but show varying degrees of statistical significance with respect to the detection and characterization of PCa in current studies. Phenomenological model parameters lack specificity, which has motivated the development of more descriptive tissue models that directly relate microstructural features to the DWI signal. Finally, we present two of such structural models, i. e. the VERDICT (Vascular, Extracellular, and Restricted Diffusion for Cytometry in Tumors) and RSI (Restriction Spectrum Imaging) model. Both have shown promising results in initial studies regarding the characterization and prognosis of PCa. CONCLUSION Recent developments in DWI techniques promise increasing accuracy and more specific statements about microstructural changes of PCa. However, further studies are necessary to establish a standardized DWI protocol for the diagnosis of PCa. KEY POINTS · DWI is paramount to the mpMRI exam for the diagnosis of PCa.. · Though of clinical value, the ADC model lacks specificity and oversimplifies tissue complexities.. · Advanced phenomenological and structural models have been developed to describe the DWI signal.. · Phenomenological models may improve diagnostics but show inconsistent results regarding PCa assessment.. · Structural models have demonstrated promising results in initial studies regarding PCa characterization.. CITATION FORMAT · Wichtmann BD, Zöllner FG, Attenberger UI et al. Multiparametric MRI in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: Physical Foundations, Limitations, and Prospective Advances of Diffusion-Weighted MRI. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2021; 193: 399 - 409.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Frank Gerrit Zöllner
- Computer Assisted Clinical Medicine, Mannheim Institute for Intelligent Systems in Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | | | - Stefan O Schönberg
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Zhang Z, Wu HH, Priester A, Magyar C, Afshari Mirak S, Shakeri S, Mohammadian Bajgiran A, Hosseiny M, Azadikhah A, Sung K, Reiter RE, Sisk AE, Raman S, Enzmann DR. Prostate Microstructure in Prostate Cancer Using 3-T MRI with Diffusion-Relaxation Correlation Spectrum Imaging: Validation with Whole-Mount Digital Histopathology. Radiology 2020; 296:348-355. [PMID: 32515678 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2020192330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Background Microstructural MRI has the potential to improve diagnosis and characterization of prostate cancer (PCa), but validation with histopathology is lacking. Purpose To validate ex vivo diffusion-relaxation correlation spectrum imaging (DR-CSI) in the characterization of microstructural tissue compartments in prostate specimens from men with PCa by using registered whole-mount digital histopathology (WMHP) as the reference standard. Materials and Methods Men with PCa who underwent 3-T MRI and robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy between June 2018 and January 2019 were prospectively studied. After prostatectomy, the fresh whole prostate specimens were imaged in patient-specific three-dimensionally printed molds by using 3-T MRI with DR-CSI and were then sliced to create coregistered WMHP slides. The DR-CSI spectral signal component fractions (fA, fB, fC) were compared with epithelial, stromal, and luminal area fractions (fepithelium, fstroma, flumen) quantified in PCa and benign tissue regions. A linear mixed-effects model assessed the correlations between (fA, fB, fC) and (fepithelium, fstroma, flumen), and the strength of correlations was evaluated by using Spearman correlation coefficients. Differences between PCa and benign tissues in terms of DR-CSI signal components and microscopic tissue compartments were assessed using two-sided t tests. Results Prostate specimens from nine men (mean age, 65 years ± 7 [standard deviation]) were evaluated; 20 regions from 17 PCas, along with 20 benign tissue regions of interest, were analyzed. Three DR-CSI spectral signal components (spectral peaks) were consistently identified. The fA, fB, and fC were correlated with fepithelium, fstroma, and flumen (all P < .001), with Spearman correlation coefficients of 0.74 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.62, 0.83), 0.80 (95% CI: 0.66, 0.89), and 0.67 (95% CI: 0.51, 0.81), respectively. PCa exhibited differences compared with benign tissues in terms of increased fA (PCa vs benign, 0.37 ± 0.05 vs 0.27 ± 0.06; P < .001), decreased fC (PCa vs benign, 0.18 ± 0.06 vs 0.31 ± 0.13; P = .01), increased fepithelium (PCa vs benign, 0.44 ± 0.13 vs 0.26 ± 0.16; P < .001), and decreased flumen (PCa vs benign, 0.14 ± 0.08 vs 0.27 ± 0.18; P = .004). Conclusion Diffusion-relaxation correlation spectrum imaging signal components correlate with microscopic tissue compartments in the prostate and differ between cancer and benign tissue. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Lee and Hectors in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhaohuan Zhang
- From the Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine (Z.Z., H.H.W., S.A.M., S.S., A.M.B., M.H., A.A., K.S., S.R., D.R.E.), Department of Bioengineering (Z.Z., H.H.W.), Department of Urology (A.P., R.E.R.), and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (C.M., A.E.S.), University of California, Los Angeles, 300 UCLA Medical Plaza, Suite B119, Los Angeles, CA 90095
| | - Holden H Wu
- From the Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine (Z.Z., H.H.W., S.A.M., S.S., A.M.B., M.H., A.A., K.S., S.R., D.R.E.), Department of Bioengineering (Z.Z., H.H.W.), Department of Urology (A.P., R.E.R.), and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (C.M., A.E.S.), University of California, Los Angeles, 300 UCLA Medical Plaza, Suite B119, Los Angeles, CA 90095
| | - Alan Priester
- From the Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine (Z.Z., H.H.W., S.A.M., S.S., A.M.B., M.H., A.A., K.S., S.R., D.R.E.), Department of Bioengineering (Z.Z., H.H.W.), Department of Urology (A.P., R.E.R.), and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (C.M., A.E.S.), University of California, Los Angeles, 300 UCLA Medical Plaza, Suite B119, Los Angeles, CA 90095
| | - Clara Magyar
- From the Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine (Z.Z., H.H.W., S.A.M., S.S., A.M.B., M.H., A.A., K.S., S.R., D.R.E.), Department of Bioengineering (Z.Z., H.H.W.), Department of Urology (A.P., R.E.R.), and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (C.M., A.E.S.), University of California, Los Angeles, 300 UCLA Medical Plaza, Suite B119, Los Angeles, CA 90095
| | - Sohrab Afshari Mirak
- From the Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine (Z.Z., H.H.W., S.A.M., S.S., A.M.B., M.H., A.A., K.S., S.R., D.R.E.), Department of Bioengineering (Z.Z., H.H.W.), Department of Urology (A.P., R.E.R.), and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (C.M., A.E.S.), University of California, Los Angeles, 300 UCLA Medical Plaza, Suite B119, Los Angeles, CA 90095
| | - Sepideh Shakeri
- From the Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine (Z.Z., H.H.W., S.A.M., S.S., A.M.B., M.H., A.A., K.S., S.R., D.R.E.), Department of Bioengineering (Z.Z., H.H.W.), Department of Urology (A.P., R.E.R.), and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (C.M., A.E.S.), University of California, Los Angeles, 300 UCLA Medical Plaza, Suite B119, Los Angeles, CA 90095
| | - Amirhossein Mohammadian Bajgiran
- From the Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine (Z.Z., H.H.W., S.A.M., S.S., A.M.B., M.H., A.A., K.S., S.R., D.R.E.), Department of Bioengineering (Z.Z., H.H.W.), Department of Urology (A.P., R.E.R.), and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (C.M., A.E.S.), University of California, Los Angeles, 300 UCLA Medical Plaza, Suite B119, Los Angeles, CA 90095
| | - Melina Hosseiny
- From the Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine (Z.Z., H.H.W., S.A.M., S.S., A.M.B., M.H., A.A., K.S., S.R., D.R.E.), Department of Bioengineering (Z.Z., H.H.W.), Department of Urology (A.P., R.E.R.), and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (C.M., A.E.S.), University of California, Los Angeles, 300 UCLA Medical Plaza, Suite B119, Los Angeles, CA 90095
| | - Afshin Azadikhah
- From the Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine (Z.Z., H.H.W., S.A.M., S.S., A.M.B., M.H., A.A., K.S., S.R., D.R.E.), Department of Bioengineering (Z.Z., H.H.W.), Department of Urology (A.P., R.E.R.), and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (C.M., A.E.S.), University of California, Los Angeles, 300 UCLA Medical Plaza, Suite B119, Los Angeles, CA 90095
| | - Kyunghyun Sung
- From the Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine (Z.Z., H.H.W., S.A.M., S.S., A.M.B., M.H., A.A., K.S., S.R., D.R.E.), Department of Bioengineering (Z.Z., H.H.W.), Department of Urology (A.P., R.E.R.), and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (C.M., A.E.S.), University of California, Los Angeles, 300 UCLA Medical Plaza, Suite B119, Los Angeles, CA 90095
| | - Robert E Reiter
- From the Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine (Z.Z., H.H.W., S.A.M., S.S., A.M.B., M.H., A.A., K.S., S.R., D.R.E.), Department of Bioengineering (Z.Z., H.H.W.), Department of Urology (A.P., R.E.R.), and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (C.M., A.E.S.), University of California, Los Angeles, 300 UCLA Medical Plaza, Suite B119, Los Angeles, CA 90095
| | - Anthony E Sisk
- From the Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine (Z.Z., H.H.W., S.A.M., S.S., A.M.B., M.H., A.A., K.S., S.R., D.R.E.), Department of Bioengineering (Z.Z., H.H.W.), Department of Urology (A.P., R.E.R.), and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (C.M., A.E.S.), University of California, Los Angeles, 300 UCLA Medical Plaza, Suite B119, Los Angeles, CA 90095
| | - Steven Raman
- From the Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine (Z.Z., H.H.W., S.A.M., S.S., A.M.B., M.H., A.A., K.S., S.R., D.R.E.), Department of Bioengineering (Z.Z., H.H.W.), Department of Urology (A.P., R.E.R.), and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (C.M., A.E.S.), University of California, Los Angeles, 300 UCLA Medical Plaza, Suite B119, Los Angeles, CA 90095
| | - Dieter R Enzmann
- From the Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine (Z.Z., H.H.W., S.A.M., S.S., A.M.B., M.H., A.A., K.S., S.R., D.R.E.), Department of Bioengineering (Z.Z., H.H.W.), Department of Urology (A.P., R.E.R.), and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (C.M., A.E.S.), University of California, Los Angeles, 300 UCLA Medical Plaza, Suite B119, Los Angeles, CA 90095
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Goodburn RJ, Barrett T, Patterson I, Gallagher FA, Lawrence EM, Gnanapragasam VJ, Kastner C, Priest AN. Removing rician bias in diffusional kurtosis of the prostate using real-data reconstruction. Magn Reson Med 2020; 83:2243-2252. [PMID: 31737935 PMCID: PMC7065237 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.28080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2018] [Revised: 10/22/2019] [Accepted: 10/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare prostate diffusional kurtosis imaging (DKI) metrics generated using phase-corrected real data with those generated using magnitude data with and without noise compensation (NC). METHODS Diffusion-weighted images were acquired at 3T in 16 prostate cancer patients, measuring 6 b-values (0-1500 s/mm2 ), each acquired with 6 signal averages along 3 diffusion directions, with noise-only images acquired to allow NC. In addition to conventional magnitude averaging, phase-corrected real data were averaged in an attempt to reduce rician noise-bias, with a range of phase-correction low-pass filter (LPF) sizes (8-128 pixels) tested. Each method was also tested using simulations. Pixelwise maps of apparent diffusion (D) and apparent kurtosis (K) were calculated for magnitude data with and without NC and phase-corrected real data. Average values were compared in tumor, normal transition zone (NTZ), and normal peripheral zone (NPZ). RESULTS Simulations indicated LPF size can strongly affect K metrics, where 64-pixel LPFs produced accurate metrics. Relative to metrics estimated from magnitude data without NC, median NC K were lower (P < 0.0001) by 6/11/8% in tumor/NPZ/NTZ, 64-LPF real-data K were lower (P < 0.0001) by 4/10/7%, respectively. CONCLUSION Compared with magnitude data with NC, phase-corrected real data can produce similar K, although the choice of phase-correction LPF should be chosen carefully.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosie J. Goodburn
- Department of Medical PhysicsCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustCambridgeUnited Kingdom
- Division of Radiotherapy and ImagingThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondon
| | - Tristan Barrett
- Department of RadiologySchool of Clinical MedicineUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUnited Kingdom
| | - Ilse Patterson
- Department of RadiologyCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustCambridgeUnited Kingdom
| | - Ferdia A. Gallagher
- Department of RadiologySchool of Clinical MedicineUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUnited Kingdom
| | - Edward M. Lawrence
- Department of RadiologySchool of Clinical MedicineUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUnited Kingdom
| | | | - Christof Kastner
- Department of UrologyCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustCambridgeUnited Kingdom
| | - Andrew N. Priest
- Department of RadiologySchool of Clinical MedicineUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUnited Kingdom
- Department of RadiologyCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustCambridgeUnited Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Meyer HJ, Wienke A, Surov A. Discrimination between clinical significant and insignificant prostate cancer with apparent diffusion coefficient - a systematic review and meta analysis. BMC Cancer 2020; 20:482. [PMID: 32460795 PMCID: PMC7254689 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-06942-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2020] [Accepted: 05/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Prostate MRI has become a corner stone in diagnosis of prostate cancer (PC). Diffusion weighted imaging and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) can be used to reflect tumor microstructure. The present analysis sought to compare ADC values of clinically insignificant with clinical significant PC based upon a large patient sample. Methods MEDLINE library and SCOPUS databases were screened for the associations between ADC and Gleason score (GS) in PC up to May 2019. The primary endpoint of the systematic review was the ADC value of PC groups according to Gleason score. In total 26 studies were suitable for the analysis and included into the present study. The included studies comprised a total of 1633 lesions. Results Clinically significant PCs (GS ≥ 7) were diagnosed in 1078 cases (66.0%) and insignificant PCs (GS 5 and 6) in 555 cases (34.0%). The pooled mean ADC value derived from monoexponenantially fitted ADCmean of the clinically significant PC was 0.86 × 10− 3 mm2/s [95% CI 0.83–0.90] and the pooled mean value of insignificant PC was 1.1 × 10− 3 mm2/s [95% CI 1.03–1.18]. Clinical significant PC showed lower ADC values compared to non-significant PC. The pooled ADC values of clinically insignificant PCs were no lower than 0.75 × 10− 3 mm2/s. Conclusions We evaluated the published literature comparing clinical insignificant with clinically prostate cancer in regard of the Apparent diffusion coefficient values derived from magnetic resonance imaging. We identified that the clinically insignificant prostate cancer have lower ADC values than clinically significant, which may aid in tumor noninvasive tumor characterization in clinical routine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans-Jonas Meyer
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
| | - Andreas Wienke
- Institute of Medical Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Informatics, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Alexey Surov
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Martins ML, Dinitzen AB, Mamontov E, Rudić S, Pereira JEM, Hartmann-Petersen R, Herwig KW, Bordallo HN. Water dynamics in MCF-7 breast cancer cells: a neutron scattering descriptive study. Sci Rep 2019; 9:8704. [PMID: 31213625 PMCID: PMC6581907 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-45056-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2018] [Accepted: 05/29/2019] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Water mobility in cancer cells could be a powerful parameter to predict the progression or remission of tumors. In the present descriptive work, new insight into this concept was achieved by combining neutron scattering and thermal analyses. The results provide the first step to untangle the role played by water dynamics in breast cancer cells (MCF-7) after treatment with a chemotherapy drug. By thermal analyses, the cells were probed as micrometric reservoirs of bulk-like and confined water populations. Under this perspective we showed that the drug clearly alters the properties of the confined water. We have independently validated this idea by accessing the cellular water dynamics using inelastic neutron scattering. Finally, analysis of the quasi-elastic neutron scattering data allows us to hypothesize that, in this particular cell line, diffusion increases in the intracellular water in response to the action of the drug on the nanosecond timescale.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Murillo L Martins
- Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark. .,System and Production Engineering Graduate Program, Pontifical Catholic University of Goias, 74605-010, Goiania, Brazil.
| | | | - Eugene Mamontov
- Neutron Scattering Division, Neutron Sciences Directorate, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, 37831, United States
| | - Svemir Rudić
- ISIS Facility, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Chilton, Didcot, OX11 OQX, UK
| | - José E M Pereira
- Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Kenneth W Herwig
- Neutron Scattering Division, Neutron Sciences Directorate, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, 37831, United States
| | - Heloisa N Bordallo
- Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.,European Spallation Source, PO Box 176, SE-221 00, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Revisiting quantitative multi-parametric MRI of benign prostatic hyperplasia and its differentiation from transition zone cancer. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2019; 44:2233-2243. [PMID: 30955071 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-019-01936-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study investigates the multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) appearance of different types of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and whether quantitative mpMRI is effective in differentiating between prostate cancer (PCa) and BPH. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients (n = 60) with confirmed PCa underwent preoperative 3T MRI. T2-weighted, multi-echo T2-weighted, diffusion weighted and dynamic contrast enhanced images (DCE) were obtained prior to undergoing prostatectomy. PCa and BPH (cystic, glandular or stromal) were identified in the transition zone and matched with MRI. Quantitative mpMRI metrics: T2, ADC and DCE-MRI parameters using an empirical mathematical model were measured. RESULTS ADC values were significantly lower (p < 0.001) in PCa compared to all BPH types and can differentiate between PCa and BPH with high accuracy (AUC = 0.87, p < 0.001). T2 values were significantly lower (p < 0.001) in PCa compared to cystic BPH only, while glandular (p = 0.27) and stromal BPH (p = 0.99) showed no significant difference from PCa. BPH mimics PCa in the transition zone on DCE-MRI evidenced by no significant difference between them. mpMRI values of glandular (ADC = 1.31 ± 0.22 µm2/ms, T2 = 115.7 ± 37.3 ms) and cystic BPH (ADC = 1.92 ± 0.43 µm2/ms, T2 = 242.8 ± 117.9 ms) are significantly different. There was no significant difference in ADC (p = 0.72) and T2 (p = 0.46) between glandular and stromal BPH. CONCLUSIONS Multiparametric MRI and specifically quantitative ADC values can be used for differentiating PCa and BPH, improving PCa diagnosis in the transition zone. However, DCE-MRI metrics are not effective in distinguishing PCa and BPH. Glandular BPH are not hyperintense on ADC and T2 as previously thought and have similar quantitative mpMRI measurements to stromal BPH. Glandular and cystic BPH appear differently on mpMRI and are histologically different.
Collapse
|
18
|
Bailey C, Bourne RM, Siow B, Johnston EW, Brizmohun Appayya M, Pye H, Heavey S, Mertzanidou T, Whitaker H, Freeman A, Patel D, Shaw GL, Sridhar A, Hawkes DJ, Punwani S, Alexander DC, Panagiotaki E. VERDICT MRI validation in fresh and fixed prostate specimens using patient-specific moulds for histological and MR alignment. NMR IN BIOMEDICINE 2019; 32:e4073. [PMID: 30779863 PMCID: PMC6519204 DOI: 10.1002/nbm.4073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2018] [Revised: 01/07/2019] [Accepted: 01/09/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
The VERDICT framework for modelling diffusion MRI data aims to relate parameters from a biophysical model to histological features used for tumour grading in prostate cancer. Validation of the VERDICT model is necessary for clinical use. This study compared VERDICT parameters obtained ex vivo with histology in five specimens from radical prostatectomy. A patient-specific 3D-printed mould was used to investigate the effects of fixation on VERDICT parameters and to aid registration to histology. A rich diffusion data set was acquired in each ex vivo prostate before and after fixation. At both time points, data were best described by a two-compartment model: the model assumes that an anisotropic tensor compartment represents the extracellular space and a restricted sphere compartment models the intracellular space. The effect of fixation on model parameters associated with tissue microstructure was small. The patient-specific mould minimized tissue deformations and co-localized slices, so that rigid registration of MRI to histology images allowed region-based comparison with histology. The VERDICT estimate of the intracellular volume fraction corresponded to histological indicators of cellular fraction, including high values in tumour regions. The average sphere radius from VERDICT, representing the average cell size, was relatively uniform across samples. The primary diffusion direction from the extracellular compartment of the VERDICT model aligned with collagen fibre patterns in the stroma obtained by structure tensor analysis. This confirmed the biophysical relationship between ex vivo VERDICT parameters and tissue microstructure from histology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colleen Bailey
- Centre for Medical Image ComputingUniversity College LondonLondonUK
- Sunnybrook Research InstituteTorontoONCanada
| | - Roger M. Bourne
- Discipline of Medical Radiation SciencesThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia
| | - Bernard Siow
- Centre for Advanced Biomedical ImagingUniversity College LondonLondonUK
- ImagingFrancis Crick InstituteLondonUK
| | | | | | - Hayley Pye
- Division of Surgery and Interventional ScienceUniversity College LondonLondonUK
- Department of UrologyUniversity College London HospitalsLondonUK
| | - Susan Heavey
- Division of Surgery and Interventional ScienceUniversity College LondonLondonUK
- Department of UrologyUniversity College London HospitalsLondonUK
| | | | - Hayley Whitaker
- Division of Surgery and Interventional ScienceUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Alex Freeman
- Department of Research PathologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Dominic Patel
- Department of Research PathologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Greg L. Shaw
- Division of Surgery and Interventional ScienceUniversity College LondonLondonUK
- Department of UrologyUniversity College London HospitalsLondonUK
| | - Ashwin Sridhar
- Division of Surgery and Interventional ScienceUniversity College LondonLondonUK
- Department of UrologyUniversity College London HospitalsLondonUK
| | - David J. Hawkes
- Centre for Medical Image ComputingUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Shonit Punwani
- Centre for Medical ImagingUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Johnston EW, Bonet-Carne E, Ferizi U, Yvernault B, Pye H, Patel D, Clemente J, Piga W, Heavey S, Sidhu HS, Giganti F, O’Callaghan J, Brizmohun Appayya M, Grey A, Saborowska A, Ourselin S, Hawkes D, Moore CM, Emberton M, Ahmed HU, Whitaker H, Rodriguez-Justo M, Freeman A, Atkinson D, Alexander D, Panagiotaki E, Punwani S. VERDICT MRI for Prostate Cancer: Intracellular Volume Fraction versus Apparent Diffusion Coefficient. Radiology 2019; 291:391-397. [PMID: 30938627 PMCID: PMC6493214 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2019181749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2018] [Revised: 01/25/2019] [Accepted: 01/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Background Biologic specificity of diffusion MRI in relation to prostate cancer aggressiveness may improve by examining separate components of the diffusion MRI signal. The Vascular, Extracellular, and Restricted Diffusion for Cytometry in Tumors (VERDICT) model estimates three distinct signal components and associates them to (a) intracellular water, (b) water in the extracellular extravascular space, and (c) water in the microvasculature. Purpose To evaluate the repeatability, image quality, and diagnostic utility of intracellular volume fraction (FIC) maps obtained with VERDICT prostate MRI and to compare those maps with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps for Gleason grade differentiation. Materials and Methods Seventy men (median age, 62.2 years; range, 49.5-82.0 years) suspected of having prostate cancer or undergoing active surveillance were recruited to a prospective study between April 2016 and October 2017. All men underwent multiparametric prostate and VERDICT MRI. Forty-two of the 70 men (median age, 67.7 years; range, 50.0-82.0 years) underwent two VERDICT MRI acquisitions to assess repeatability of FIC measurements obtained with VERDICT MRI. Repeatability was measured with use of intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). The image quality of FIC and ADC maps was independently evaluated by two board-certified radiologists. Forty-two men (median age, 64.8 years; range, 49.5-79.6 years) underwent targeted biopsy, which enabled comparison of FIC and ADC metrics in the differentiation between Gleason grades. Results VERDICT MRI FIC demonstrated ICCs of 0.87-0.95. There was no significant difference between image quality of ADC and FIC maps (score, 3.1 vs 3.3, respectively; P = .90). FIC was higher in lesions with a Gleason grade of at least 3+4 compared with benign and/or Gleason grade 3+3 lesions (mean, 0.49 ± 0.17 vs 0.31 ± 0.12, respectively; P = .002). The difference in ADC between these groups did not reach statistical significance (mean, 1.42 vs 1.16 × 10-3 mm2/sec; P = .26). Conclusion Fractional intracellular volume demonstrates high repeatability and image quality and enables better differentiation of a Gleason 4 component cancer from benign and/or Gleason 3+3 histology than apparent diffusion coefficient. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Sigmund and Rosenkrantz in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward W. Johnston
- From the UCL Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London,
2nd Floor Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London W1W 7TS, England
(E.W.J., E.B.C., H.S.S., J.O., M.B.A., D. Atkinson, S.P.); UCL Centre for
Medical Image Computing, London, England (E.B.C., U.F., B.Y., S.O., D.H., D.
Alexander, E.P.); UCL Centre for Molecular Intervention, London, England (H.P.,
S.H., H.W.); Department of Histopathology, University College Hospital, London,
England (D.P., M.R.J., A.F.); Department of Radiology (J.C.) and Centre for
Medical Imaging (J.C., W.P., A.S.), University College Hospital, London,
England; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Faculty of Medical
Sciences, University College London, London, England (F.G., A.G., C.M.M., M.E.);
and Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, England
(H.U.A.)
| | - Elisenda Bonet-Carne
- From the UCL Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London,
2nd Floor Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London W1W 7TS, England
(E.W.J., E.B.C., H.S.S., J.O., M.B.A., D. Atkinson, S.P.); UCL Centre for
Medical Image Computing, London, England (E.B.C., U.F., B.Y., S.O., D.H., D.
Alexander, E.P.); UCL Centre for Molecular Intervention, London, England (H.P.,
S.H., H.W.); Department of Histopathology, University College Hospital, London,
England (D.P., M.R.J., A.F.); Department of Radiology (J.C.) and Centre for
Medical Imaging (J.C., W.P., A.S.), University College Hospital, London,
England; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Faculty of Medical
Sciences, University College London, London, England (F.G., A.G., C.M.M., M.E.);
and Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, England
(H.U.A.)
| | - Uran Ferizi
- From the UCL Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London,
2nd Floor Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London W1W 7TS, England
(E.W.J., E.B.C., H.S.S., J.O., M.B.A., D. Atkinson, S.P.); UCL Centre for
Medical Image Computing, London, England (E.B.C., U.F., B.Y., S.O., D.H., D.
Alexander, E.P.); UCL Centre for Molecular Intervention, London, England (H.P.,
S.H., H.W.); Department of Histopathology, University College Hospital, London,
England (D.P., M.R.J., A.F.); Department of Radiology (J.C.) and Centre for
Medical Imaging (J.C., W.P., A.S.), University College Hospital, London,
England; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Faculty of Medical
Sciences, University College London, London, England (F.G., A.G., C.M.M., M.E.);
and Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, England
(H.U.A.)
| | - Ben Yvernault
- From the UCL Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London,
2nd Floor Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London W1W 7TS, England
(E.W.J., E.B.C., H.S.S., J.O., M.B.A., D. Atkinson, S.P.); UCL Centre for
Medical Image Computing, London, England (E.B.C., U.F., B.Y., S.O., D.H., D.
Alexander, E.P.); UCL Centre for Molecular Intervention, London, England (H.P.,
S.H., H.W.); Department of Histopathology, University College Hospital, London,
England (D.P., M.R.J., A.F.); Department of Radiology (J.C.) and Centre for
Medical Imaging (J.C., W.P., A.S.), University College Hospital, London,
England; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Faculty of Medical
Sciences, University College London, London, England (F.G., A.G., C.M.M., M.E.);
and Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, England
(H.U.A.)
| | - Hayley Pye
- From the UCL Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London,
2nd Floor Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London W1W 7TS, England
(E.W.J., E.B.C., H.S.S., J.O., M.B.A., D. Atkinson, S.P.); UCL Centre for
Medical Image Computing, London, England (E.B.C., U.F., B.Y., S.O., D.H., D.
Alexander, E.P.); UCL Centre for Molecular Intervention, London, England (H.P.,
S.H., H.W.); Department of Histopathology, University College Hospital, London,
England (D.P., M.R.J., A.F.); Department of Radiology (J.C.) and Centre for
Medical Imaging (J.C., W.P., A.S.), University College Hospital, London,
England; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Faculty of Medical
Sciences, University College London, London, England (F.G., A.G., C.M.M., M.E.);
and Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, England
(H.U.A.)
| | - Dominic Patel
- From the UCL Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London,
2nd Floor Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London W1W 7TS, England
(E.W.J., E.B.C., H.S.S., J.O., M.B.A., D. Atkinson, S.P.); UCL Centre for
Medical Image Computing, London, England (E.B.C., U.F., B.Y., S.O., D.H., D.
Alexander, E.P.); UCL Centre for Molecular Intervention, London, England (H.P.,
S.H., H.W.); Department of Histopathology, University College Hospital, London,
England (D.P., M.R.J., A.F.); Department of Radiology (J.C.) and Centre for
Medical Imaging (J.C., W.P., A.S.), University College Hospital, London,
England; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Faculty of Medical
Sciences, University College London, London, England (F.G., A.G., C.M.M., M.E.);
and Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, England
(H.U.A.)
| | - Joey Clemente
- From the UCL Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London,
2nd Floor Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London W1W 7TS, England
(E.W.J., E.B.C., H.S.S., J.O., M.B.A., D. Atkinson, S.P.); UCL Centre for
Medical Image Computing, London, England (E.B.C., U.F., B.Y., S.O., D.H., D.
Alexander, E.P.); UCL Centre for Molecular Intervention, London, England (H.P.,
S.H., H.W.); Department of Histopathology, University College Hospital, London,
England (D.P., M.R.J., A.F.); Department of Radiology (J.C.) and Centre for
Medical Imaging (J.C., W.P., A.S.), University College Hospital, London,
England; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Faculty of Medical
Sciences, University College London, London, England (F.G., A.G., C.M.M., M.E.);
and Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, England
(H.U.A.)
| | - Wivijin Piga
- From the UCL Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London,
2nd Floor Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London W1W 7TS, England
(E.W.J., E.B.C., H.S.S., J.O., M.B.A., D. Atkinson, S.P.); UCL Centre for
Medical Image Computing, London, England (E.B.C., U.F., B.Y., S.O., D.H., D.
Alexander, E.P.); UCL Centre for Molecular Intervention, London, England (H.P.,
S.H., H.W.); Department of Histopathology, University College Hospital, London,
England (D.P., M.R.J., A.F.); Department of Radiology (J.C.) and Centre for
Medical Imaging (J.C., W.P., A.S.), University College Hospital, London,
England; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Faculty of Medical
Sciences, University College London, London, England (F.G., A.G., C.M.M., M.E.);
and Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, England
(H.U.A.)
| | - Susan Heavey
- From the UCL Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London,
2nd Floor Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London W1W 7TS, England
(E.W.J., E.B.C., H.S.S., J.O., M.B.A., D. Atkinson, S.P.); UCL Centre for
Medical Image Computing, London, England (E.B.C., U.F., B.Y., S.O., D.H., D.
Alexander, E.P.); UCL Centre for Molecular Intervention, London, England (H.P.,
S.H., H.W.); Department of Histopathology, University College Hospital, London,
England (D.P., M.R.J., A.F.); Department of Radiology (J.C.) and Centre for
Medical Imaging (J.C., W.P., A.S.), University College Hospital, London,
England; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Faculty of Medical
Sciences, University College London, London, England (F.G., A.G., C.M.M., M.E.);
and Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, England
(H.U.A.)
| | - Harbir S. Sidhu
- From the UCL Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London,
2nd Floor Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London W1W 7TS, England
(E.W.J., E.B.C., H.S.S., J.O., M.B.A., D. Atkinson, S.P.); UCL Centre for
Medical Image Computing, London, England (E.B.C., U.F., B.Y., S.O., D.H., D.
Alexander, E.P.); UCL Centre for Molecular Intervention, London, England (H.P.,
S.H., H.W.); Department of Histopathology, University College Hospital, London,
England (D.P., M.R.J., A.F.); Department of Radiology (J.C.) and Centre for
Medical Imaging (J.C., W.P., A.S.), University College Hospital, London,
England; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Faculty of Medical
Sciences, University College London, London, England (F.G., A.G., C.M.M., M.E.);
and Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, England
(H.U.A.)
| | - Francesco Giganti
- From the UCL Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London,
2nd Floor Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London W1W 7TS, England
(E.W.J., E.B.C., H.S.S., J.O., M.B.A., D. Atkinson, S.P.); UCL Centre for
Medical Image Computing, London, England (E.B.C., U.F., B.Y., S.O., D.H., D.
Alexander, E.P.); UCL Centre for Molecular Intervention, London, England (H.P.,
S.H., H.W.); Department of Histopathology, University College Hospital, London,
England (D.P., M.R.J., A.F.); Department of Radiology (J.C.) and Centre for
Medical Imaging (J.C., W.P., A.S.), University College Hospital, London,
England; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Faculty of Medical
Sciences, University College London, London, England (F.G., A.G., C.M.M., M.E.);
and Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, England
(H.U.A.)
| | - James O’Callaghan
- From the UCL Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London,
2nd Floor Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London W1W 7TS, England
(E.W.J., E.B.C., H.S.S., J.O., M.B.A., D. Atkinson, S.P.); UCL Centre for
Medical Image Computing, London, England (E.B.C., U.F., B.Y., S.O., D.H., D.
Alexander, E.P.); UCL Centre for Molecular Intervention, London, England (H.P.,
S.H., H.W.); Department of Histopathology, University College Hospital, London,
England (D.P., M.R.J., A.F.); Department of Radiology (J.C.) and Centre for
Medical Imaging (J.C., W.P., A.S.), University College Hospital, London,
England; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Faculty of Medical
Sciences, University College London, London, England (F.G., A.G., C.M.M., M.E.);
and Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, England
(H.U.A.)
| | - Mrishta Brizmohun Appayya
- From the UCL Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London,
2nd Floor Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London W1W 7TS, England
(E.W.J., E.B.C., H.S.S., J.O., M.B.A., D. Atkinson, S.P.); UCL Centre for
Medical Image Computing, London, England (E.B.C., U.F., B.Y., S.O., D.H., D.
Alexander, E.P.); UCL Centre for Molecular Intervention, London, England (H.P.,
S.H., H.W.); Department of Histopathology, University College Hospital, London,
England (D.P., M.R.J., A.F.); Department of Radiology (J.C.) and Centre for
Medical Imaging (J.C., W.P., A.S.), University College Hospital, London,
England; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Faculty of Medical
Sciences, University College London, London, England (F.G., A.G., C.M.M., M.E.);
and Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, England
(H.U.A.)
| | - Alistair Grey
- From the UCL Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London,
2nd Floor Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London W1W 7TS, England
(E.W.J., E.B.C., H.S.S., J.O., M.B.A., D. Atkinson, S.P.); UCL Centre for
Medical Image Computing, London, England (E.B.C., U.F., B.Y., S.O., D.H., D.
Alexander, E.P.); UCL Centre for Molecular Intervention, London, England (H.P.,
S.H., H.W.); Department of Histopathology, University College Hospital, London,
England (D.P., M.R.J., A.F.); Department of Radiology (J.C.) and Centre for
Medical Imaging (J.C., W.P., A.S.), University College Hospital, London,
England; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Faculty of Medical
Sciences, University College London, London, England (F.G., A.G., C.M.M., M.E.);
and Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, England
(H.U.A.)
| | - Alexandra Saborowska
- From the UCL Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London,
2nd Floor Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London W1W 7TS, England
(E.W.J., E.B.C., H.S.S., J.O., M.B.A., D. Atkinson, S.P.); UCL Centre for
Medical Image Computing, London, England (E.B.C., U.F., B.Y., S.O., D.H., D.
Alexander, E.P.); UCL Centre for Molecular Intervention, London, England (H.P.,
S.H., H.W.); Department of Histopathology, University College Hospital, London,
England (D.P., M.R.J., A.F.); Department of Radiology (J.C.) and Centre for
Medical Imaging (J.C., W.P., A.S.), University College Hospital, London,
England; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Faculty of Medical
Sciences, University College London, London, England (F.G., A.G., C.M.M., M.E.);
and Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, England
(H.U.A.)
| | - Sebastien Ourselin
- From the UCL Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London,
2nd Floor Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London W1W 7TS, England
(E.W.J., E.B.C., H.S.S., J.O., M.B.A., D. Atkinson, S.P.); UCL Centre for
Medical Image Computing, London, England (E.B.C., U.F., B.Y., S.O., D.H., D.
Alexander, E.P.); UCL Centre for Molecular Intervention, London, England (H.P.,
S.H., H.W.); Department of Histopathology, University College Hospital, London,
England (D.P., M.R.J., A.F.); Department of Radiology (J.C.) and Centre for
Medical Imaging (J.C., W.P., A.S.), University College Hospital, London,
England; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Faculty of Medical
Sciences, University College London, London, England (F.G., A.G., C.M.M., M.E.);
and Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, England
(H.U.A.)
| | - David Hawkes
- From the UCL Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London,
2nd Floor Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London W1W 7TS, England
(E.W.J., E.B.C., H.S.S., J.O., M.B.A., D. Atkinson, S.P.); UCL Centre for
Medical Image Computing, London, England (E.B.C., U.F., B.Y., S.O., D.H., D.
Alexander, E.P.); UCL Centre for Molecular Intervention, London, England (H.P.,
S.H., H.W.); Department of Histopathology, University College Hospital, London,
England (D.P., M.R.J., A.F.); Department of Radiology (J.C.) and Centre for
Medical Imaging (J.C., W.P., A.S.), University College Hospital, London,
England; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Faculty of Medical
Sciences, University College London, London, England (F.G., A.G., C.M.M., M.E.);
and Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, England
(H.U.A.)
| | - Caroline M. Moore
- From the UCL Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London,
2nd Floor Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London W1W 7TS, England
(E.W.J., E.B.C., H.S.S., J.O., M.B.A., D. Atkinson, S.P.); UCL Centre for
Medical Image Computing, London, England (E.B.C., U.F., B.Y., S.O., D.H., D.
Alexander, E.P.); UCL Centre for Molecular Intervention, London, England (H.P.,
S.H., H.W.); Department of Histopathology, University College Hospital, London,
England (D.P., M.R.J., A.F.); Department of Radiology (J.C.) and Centre for
Medical Imaging (J.C., W.P., A.S.), University College Hospital, London,
England; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Faculty of Medical
Sciences, University College London, London, England (F.G., A.G., C.M.M., M.E.);
and Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, England
(H.U.A.)
| | - Mark Emberton
- From the UCL Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London,
2nd Floor Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London W1W 7TS, England
(E.W.J., E.B.C., H.S.S., J.O., M.B.A., D. Atkinson, S.P.); UCL Centre for
Medical Image Computing, London, England (E.B.C., U.F., B.Y., S.O., D.H., D.
Alexander, E.P.); UCL Centre for Molecular Intervention, London, England (H.P.,
S.H., H.W.); Department of Histopathology, University College Hospital, London,
England (D.P., M.R.J., A.F.); Department of Radiology (J.C.) and Centre for
Medical Imaging (J.C., W.P., A.S.), University College Hospital, London,
England; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Faculty of Medical
Sciences, University College London, London, England (F.G., A.G., C.M.M., M.E.);
and Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, England
(H.U.A.)
| | - Hashim U. Ahmed
- From the UCL Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London,
2nd Floor Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London W1W 7TS, England
(E.W.J., E.B.C., H.S.S., J.O., M.B.A., D. Atkinson, S.P.); UCL Centre for
Medical Image Computing, London, England (E.B.C., U.F., B.Y., S.O., D.H., D.
Alexander, E.P.); UCL Centre for Molecular Intervention, London, England (H.P.,
S.H., H.W.); Department of Histopathology, University College Hospital, London,
England (D.P., M.R.J., A.F.); Department of Radiology (J.C.) and Centre for
Medical Imaging (J.C., W.P., A.S.), University College Hospital, London,
England; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Faculty of Medical
Sciences, University College London, London, England (F.G., A.G., C.M.M., M.E.);
and Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, England
(H.U.A.)
| | - Hayley Whitaker
- From the UCL Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London,
2nd Floor Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London W1W 7TS, England
(E.W.J., E.B.C., H.S.S., J.O., M.B.A., D. Atkinson, S.P.); UCL Centre for
Medical Image Computing, London, England (E.B.C., U.F., B.Y., S.O., D.H., D.
Alexander, E.P.); UCL Centre for Molecular Intervention, London, England (H.P.,
S.H., H.W.); Department of Histopathology, University College Hospital, London,
England (D.P., M.R.J., A.F.); Department of Radiology (J.C.) and Centre for
Medical Imaging (J.C., W.P., A.S.), University College Hospital, London,
England; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Faculty of Medical
Sciences, University College London, London, England (F.G., A.G., C.M.M., M.E.);
and Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, England
(H.U.A.)
| | - Manuel Rodriguez-Justo
- From the UCL Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London,
2nd Floor Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London W1W 7TS, England
(E.W.J., E.B.C., H.S.S., J.O., M.B.A., D. Atkinson, S.P.); UCL Centre for
Medical Image Computing, London, England (E.B.C., U.F., B.Y., S.O., D.H., D.
Alexander, E.P.); UCL Centre for Molecular Intervention, London, England (H.P.,
S.H., H.W.); Department of Histopathology, University College Hospital, London,
England (D.P., M.R.J., A.F.); Department of Radiology (J.C.) and Centre for
Medical Imaging (J.C., W.P., A.S.), University College Hospital, London,
England; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Faculty of Medical
Sciences, University College London, London, England (F.G., A.G., C.M.M., M.E.);
and Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, England
(H.U.A.)
| | - Alexander Freeman
- From the UCL Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London,
2nd Floor Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London W1W 7TS, England
(E.W.J., E.B.C., H.S.S., J.O., M.B.A., D. Atkinson, S.P.); UCL Centre for
Medical Image Computing, London, England (E.B.C., U.F., B.Y., S.O., D.H., D.
Alexander, E.P.); UCL Centre for Molecular Intervention, London, England (H.P.,
S.H., H.W.); Department of Histopathology, University College Hospital, London,
England (D.P., M.R.J., A.F.); Department of Radiology (J.C.) and Centre for
Medical Imaging (J.C., W.P., A.S.), University College Hospital, London,
England; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Faculty of Medical
Sciences, University College London, London, England (F.G., A.G., C.M.M., M.E.);
and Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, England
(H.U.A.)
| | - David Atkinson
- From the UCL Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London,
2nd Floor Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London W1W 7TS, England
(E.W.J., E.B.C., H.S.S., J.O., M.B.A., D. Atkinson, S.P.); UCL Centre for
Medical Image Computing, London, England (E.B.C., U.F., B.Y., S.O., D.H., D.
Alexander, E.P.); UCL Centre for Molecular Intervention, London, England (H.P.,
S.H., H.W.); Department of Histopathology, University College Hospital, London,
England (D.P., M.R.J., A.F.); Department of Radiology (J.C.) and Centre for
Medical Imaging (J.C., W.P., A.S.), University College Hospital, London,
England; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Faculty of Medical
Sciences, University College London, London, England (F.G., A.G., C.M.M., M.E.);
and Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, England
(H.U.A.)
| | - Daniel Alexander
- From the UCL Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London,
2nd Floor Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London W1W 7TS, England
(E.W.J., E.B.C., H.S.S., J.O., M.B.A., D. Atkinson, S.P.); UCL Centre for
Medical Image Computing, London, England (E.B.C., U.F., B.Y., S.O., D.H., D.
Alexander, E.P.); UCL Centre for Molecular Intervention, London, England (H.P.,
S.H., H.W.); Department of Histopathology, University College Hospital, London,
England (D.P., M.R.J., A.F.); Department of Radiology (J.C.) and Centre for
Medical Imaging (J.C., W.P., A.S.), University College Hospital, London,
England; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Faculty of Medical
Sciences, University College London, London, England (F.G., A.G., C.M.M., M.E.);
and Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, England
(H.U.A.)
| | - Eleftheria Panagiotaki
- From the UCL Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London,
2nd Floor Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London W1W 7TS, England
(E.W.J., E.B.C., H.S.S., J.O., M.B.A., D. Atkinson, S.P.); UCL Centre for
Medical Image Computing, London, England (E.B.C., U.F., B.Y., S.O., D.H., D.
Alexander, E.P.); UCL Centre for Molecular Intervention, London, England (H.P.,
S.H., H.W.); Department of Histopathology, University College Hospital, London,
England (D.P., M.R.J., A.F.); Department of Radiology (J.C.) and Centre for
Medical Imaging (J.C., W.P., A.S.), University College Hospital, London,
England; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Faculty of Medical
Sciences, University College London, London, England (F.G., A.G., C.M.M., M.E.);
and Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, England
(H.U.A.)
| | - Shonit Punwani
- From the UCL Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London,
2nd Floor Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London W1W 7TS, England
(E.W.J., E.B.C., H.S.S., J.O., M.B.A., D. Atkinson, S.P.); UCL Centre for
Medical Image Computing, London, England (E.B.C., U.F., B.Y., S.O., D.H., D.
Alexander, E.P.); UCL Centre for Molecular Intervention, London, England (H.P.,
S.H., H.W.); Department of Histopathology, University College Hospital, London,
England (D.P., M.R.J., A.F.); Department of Radiology (J.C.) and Centre for
Medical Imaging (J.C., W.P., A.S.), University College Hospital, London,
England; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Faculty of Medical
Sciences, University College London, London, England (F.G., A.G., C.M.M., M.E.);
and Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, England
(H.U.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Chatterjee A, Oto A. Future Perspectives in Multiparametric Prostate MR Imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2019; 27:117-130. [DOI: 10.1016/j.mric.2018.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
21
|
van der Sar ECA, Kasivisvanathan V, Brizmohun M, Freeman A, Punwani S, Hamoudi R, Emberton M. Management of Radiologically Indeterminate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Signals in Men at Risk of Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol Focus 2019; 5:62-68. [PMID: 28753883 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.03.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2016] [Revised: 02/22/2017] [Accepted: 03/27/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) is becoming an increasingly important diagnostic tool for prostate cancer. So far there has been little focus on management for indeterminate mp-MRI results. OBJECTIVE To describe outcomes for a cohort of men rated as having an indeterminate mp-MRI result. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Patients were identified retrospectively from a single UK centre between October 2010 and January 2015. Patients were included if they had a Likert score of 3/5 on a first MRI scan without any prior prostate biopsy. Patients were offered one of two initial management strategies. Strategy 1 was an immediate targeted biopsy of the MRI lesion. Strategy 2 was a surveillance process comprising prostate-specific antigen monitoring and/or mp-MRI at intervals of 6-12 mo, with biopsy on a for-cause basis. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Cancer detection and treatment outcomes were compared for the two strategies. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Of 168 patients, 73 (43%) chose strategy 1 and 95 (57%) chose strategy two. The overall proportion of men with clinically significant cancer detected was 14% (23/168). The risk profile for cancer identified in the initial surveillance group was similar to that identified in the immediate biopsy group. Limitations of the study include the short follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Men with indeterminate mp-MRI were willing to forego immediate biopsy for a strategy of surveillance involving PSA measurement and/or mp-MRI repeated at intervals. The risk profile of the cancers identified by both strategies appeared similar, but many men in the surveillance group avoided the risks, complications, and costs of biopsy. Long-term results are awaited. PATIENT SUMMARY This report compares two approaches for an uncertain magnetic resonance imaging result for clinically important prostate cancer: immediate biopsy versus surveillance with delayed biopsy if required. Delayed biopsy did not result in identification of cancer with adverse features, and many men benefited from avoiding a biopsy and its complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Alex Freeman
- Faculty of Medical Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Shonit Punwani
- Faculty of Medical Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Rifat Hamoudi
- Faculty of Medical Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Mark Emberton
- Faculty of Medical Science, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Bonet‐Carne E, Johnston E, Daducci A, Jacobs JG, Freeman A, Atkinson D, Hawkes DJ, Punwani S, Alexander DC, Panagiotaki E. VERDICT-AMICO: Ultrafast fitting algorithm for non-invasive prostate microstructure characterization. NMR IN BIOMEDICINE 2019; 32:e4019. [PMID: 30378195 PMCID: PMC6492114 DOI: 10.1002/nbm.4019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2018] [Revised: 08/30/2018] [Accepted: 09/01/2018] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
VERDICT (vascular, extracellular and restricted diffusion for cytometry in tumours) estimates and maps microstructural features of cancerous tissue non-invasively using diffusion MRI. The main purpose of this study is to address the high computational time of microstructural model fitting for prostate diagnosis, while retaining utility in terms of tumour conspicuity and repeatability. In this work, we adapt the accelerated microstructure imaging via convex optimization (AMICO) framework to linearize the estimation of VERDICT parameters for the prostate gland. We compare the original non-linear fitting of VERDICT with the linear fitting, quantifying accuracy with synthetic data, and computational time and reliability (performance and precision) in eight patients. We also assess the repeatability (scan-rescan) of the parameters. Comparison of the original VERDICT fitting versus VERDICT-AMICO showed that the linearized fitting (1) is more accurate in simulation for a signal-to-noise ratio of 20 dB; (2) reduces the processing time by three orders of magnitude, from 6.55 seconds/voxel to 1.78 milliseconds/voxel; (3) estimates parameters more precisely; (4) produces similar parametric maps and (5) produces similar estimated parameters with a high Pearson correlation between implementations, r2 > 0.7. The VERDICT-AMICO estimates also show high levels of repeatability. Finally, we demonstrate that VERDICT-AMICO can estimate an extra diffusivity parameter without losing tumour conspicuity and retains the fitting advantages. VERDICT-AMICO provides microstructural maps for prostate cancer characterization in seconds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisenda Bonet‐Carne
- UCL Centre for Medical ImagingLondonUK
- Department of Computer ScienceUCL Centre for Medical Image ComputingLondonUK
| | | | - Alessandro Daducci
- Computer Science DepartmentUniversity of VeronaItaly
- Radiology DepartmentCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV)Switzerland
| | - Joseph G. Jacobs
- Department of Computer ScienceUCL Centre for Medical Image ComputingLondonUK
| | | | | | - David J. Hawkes
- Department of Medical PhysicsUCL Centre for Medical Imaging ComputingLondonUK
| | | | - Daniel C. Alexander
- Department of Computer ScienceUCL Centre for Medical Image ComputingLondonUK
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Lemberskiy G, Fieremans E, Veraart J, Deng FM, Rosenkrantz AB, Novikov DS. Characterization of prostate microstructure using water diffusion and NMR relaxation. FRONTIERS IN PHYSICS 2018; 6:91. [PMID: 30568939 PMCID: PMC6296484 DOI: 10.3389/fphy.2018.00091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
Abstract
For many pathologies, early structural tissue changes occur at the cellular level, on the scale of micrometers or tens of micrometers. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a powerful non-invasive imaging tool used for medical diagnosis, but its clinical hardware is incapable of reaching the cellular length scale directly. In spite of this limitation, microscopic tissue changes in pathology can potentially be captured indirectly, from macroscopic imaging characteristics, by studying water diffusion. Here we focus on water diffusion and NMR relaxation in the human prostate, a highly heterogeneous organ at the cellular level. We present a physical picture of water diffusion and NMR relaxation in the prostate tissue, that is comprised of a densely-packed cellular compartment (composed of stroma and epithelium), and a luminal compartment with almost unrestricted water diffusion. Transverse NMR relaxation is used to identify fast and slow T 2 components, corresponding to these tissue compartments, and to disentangle the luminal and cellular compartment contributions to the temporal evolution of the overall water diffusion coefficient. Diffusion in the luminal compartment falls into the short-time surface-to-volume (S/V) limit, indicating that only a small fraction of water molecules has time to encounter the luminal walls of healthy tissue; from the S/V ratio, the average lumen diameter averaged over three young healthy subjects is measured to be 217.7±188.7 μm. Conversely, the diffusion in the cellular compartment is highly restricted and anisotropic, consistent with the fibrous character of the stromal tissue. Diffusion transverse to these fibers is well described by the random permeable barrier model (RPBM), as confirmed by the dynamical exponent ϑ = 1/2 for approaching the long-time limit of diffusion, and the corresponding structural exponent p = -1 in histology. The RPBM-derived fiber diameter and membrane permeability were 19.8±8.1 μm and 0.044±0.045 μm/ms, respectively, in agreement with known values from tissue histology and membrane biophysics. Lastly, we revisited 38 prostate cancer cases from a recently published study, and found the same dynamical exponent ϑ = 1/2 of diffusion in tumors and benign regions. Our results suggest that a multi-parametric MRI acquisition combined with biophysical modeling may be a powerful non-invasive complement to prostate cancer grading, potentially foregoing biopsies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory Lemberskiy
- Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Sackler Institute of Graduate Biomedical Sciences, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Els Fieremans
- Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA,
| | - Jelle Veraart
- Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA,
| | - Fang-Ming Deng
- Department of Pathology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY New York, NY, USA;
| | - Andrew B Rosenkrantz
- Department of Radiology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY New York, NY, USA;
| | - Dmitry S Novikov
- Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA,
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Ertas G. Detection of high GS risk group prostate tumors by diffusion tensor imaging and logistic regression modelling. Magn Reson Imaging 2018; 50:125-133. [PMID: 29649574 DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2018.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2017] [Revised: 04/05/2018] [Accepted: 04/06/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the value of joint evaluation of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) measures by using logistic regression modelling to detect high GS risk group prostate tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS Fifty tumors imaged using DTI on a 3 T MRI device were analyzed. Regions of interests focusing on the center of tumor foci and noncancerous tissue on the maps of mean diffusivity (MD) and fractional anisotropy (FA) were used to extract the minimum, the maximum and the mean measures. Measure ratio was computed by dividing tumor measure by noncancerous tissue measure. Logistic regression models were fitted for all possible pair combinations of the measures using 5-fold cross validation. RESULTS Systematic differences are present for all MD measures and also for all FA measures in distinguishing the high risk tumors [GS ≥ 7(4 + 3)] from the low risk tumors [GS ≤ 7(3 + 4)] (P < 0.05). Smaller value for MD measures and larger value for FA measures indicate the high risk. The models enrolling the measures achieve good fits and good classification performances (R2adj = 0.55-0.60, AUC = 0.88-0.91), however the models using the measure ratios perform better (R2adj = 0.59-0.75, AUC = 0.88-0.95). The model that employs the ratios of minimum MD and maximum FA accomplishes the highest sensitivity, specificity and accuracy (Se = 77.8%, Sp = 96.9% and Acc = 90.0%). CONCLUSION Joint evaluation of MD and FA diffusion tensor imaging measures is valuable to detect high GS risk group peripheral zone prostate tumors. However, use of the ratios of the measures improves the accuracy of the detections substantially. Logistic regression modelling provides a favorable solution for the joint evaluations easily adoptable in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gokhan Ertas
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Yeditepe University, Istanbul, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Chatterjee A, Bourne RM, Wang S, Devaraj A, Gallan AJ, Antic T, Karczmar GS, Oto A. Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer with Noninvasive Estimation of Prostate Tissue Composition by Using Hybrid Multidimensional MR Imaging: A Feasibility Study. Radiology 2018; 287:864-873. [PMID: 29393821 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2018171130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate whether compartmental analysis by using hybrid multidimensional magnetic resonance (MR) imaging can be used to diagnose prostate cancer and determine its aggressiveness. Materials and Methods Twenty-two patients with prostate cancer underwent preoperative 3.0-T MR imaging. Axial images were obtained with hybrid multidimensional MR imaging by using all combinations of echo times (47, 75, 100 msec) and b values of 0, 750, 1500 sec/mm2, resulting in a 3 × 3 array of data associated with each voxel. Volumes of the tissue components stroma, epithelium, and lumen were calculated by fitting the hybrid data to a three-compartment signal model, with distinct, paired apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and T2 values associated with each compartment. Volume fractions and conventional ADC and T2 were measured for regions of interest in sites of prostatectomy-verified malignancy (n = 28) and normal tissue (n = 71). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate the performance of various parameters in differentiating prostate cancer from benign tissue. Results Compared with normal tissue, prostate cancer showed significantly increased fractional volumes of epithelium (23.2% ± 7.1 vs 48.8% ± 9.2, respectively) and reduced fractional volumes of lumen (26.4% ± 14.1 vs 14.0% ± 5.2) and stroma (50.5% ± 15.7 vs 37.2% ± 9.1) by using hybrid multidimensional MR imaging. The fractional volumes of tissue components show a significantly higher Spearman correlation coefficient with Gleason score (epithelium: ρ = 0.652, P = .0001; stroma: ρ = -0.439, P = .020; lumen: ρ = -0.390, P = .040) compared with traditional T2 values (ρ = -0.292, P = .132) and ADCs (ρ = -0.315, P = .102). The area under the ROC curve for differentiation of cancer from normal prostate was highest for fractional volume of epithelium (0.991), followed by fractional volumes of lumen (0.800) and stroma (0.789). Conclusion Fractional volumes of prostatic lumen, stroma, and epithelium change significantly when cancer is present. These parameters can be measured noninvasively by using hybrid multidimensional MR imaging and have the potential to improve the diagnosis of prostate cancer and determine its aggressiveness. © RSNA, 2018 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aritrick Chatterjee
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.C., S.W., G.S.K., A.O.) and Pathology (A.J.G., T.A.), University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL 60637; Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia (R.M.B.); and Philips Research North America, Cambridge, Mass (A.D.)
| | - Roger M Bourne
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.C., S.W., G.S.K., A.O.) and Pathology (A.J.G., T.A.), University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL 60637; Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia (R.M.B.); and Philips Research North America, Cambridge, Mass (A.D.)
| | - Shiyang Wang
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.C., S.W., G.S.K., A.O.) and Pathology (A.J.G., T.A.), University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL 60637; Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia (R.M.B.); and Philips Research North America, Cambridge, Mass (A.D.)
| | - Ajit Devaraj
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.C., S.W., G.S.K., A.O.) and Pathology (A.J.G., T.A.), University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL 60637; Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia (R.M.B.); and Philips Research North America, Cambridge, Mass (A.D.)
| | - Alexander J Gallan
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.C., S.W., G.S.K., A.O.) and Pathology (A.J.G., T.A.), University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL 60637; Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia (R.M.B.); and Philips Research North America, Cambridge, Mass (A.D.)
| | - Tatjana Antic
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.C., S.W., G.S.K., A.O.) and Pathology (A.J.G., T.A.), University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL 60637; Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia (R.M.B.); and Philips Research North America, Cambridge, Mass (A.D.)
| | - Gregory S Karczmar
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.C., S.W., G.S.K., A.O.) and Pathology (A.J.G., T.A.), University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL 60637; Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia (R.M.B.); and Philips Research North America, Cambridge, Mass (A.D.)
| | - Aytekin Oto
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.C., S.W., G.S.K., A.O.) and Pathology (A.J.G., T.A.), University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL 60637; Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia (R.M.B.); and Philips Research North America, Cambridge, Mass (A.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Jambor I. Optimization of prostate MRI acquisition and post-processing protocol: a pictorial review with access to acquisition protocols. Acta Radiol Open 2017; 6:2058460117745574. [PMID: 29242748 PMCID: PMC5724653 DOI: 10.1177/2058460117745574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2017] [Accepted: 11/07/2017] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this review article is to provide insight into the optimization of 1.5-Testla (T) and 3-T prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). An approach for optimization of data quantification, especially diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), is provided. Benefits and limitations of various pulse sequences are discussed. Importable MRI protocols and access to imaging datasets is provided. Careful optimization of prostate MR acquisition protocol allows the acquisition of high-quality prostate MRI using clinical 1.5-T/3-T MR scanners with an overall acquisition time < 15 min.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivan Jambor
- Department of Radiology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Bourne R, Liang S, Panagiotaki E, Bongers A, Sved P, Watson G. Measurement and modeling of diffusion time dependence of apparent diffusion coefficient and fractional anisotropy in prostate tissue ex vivo. NMR IN BIOMEDICINE 2017; 30:e3751. [PMID: 28665041 DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2017] [Revised: 04/17/2017] [Accepted: 04/26/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to measure and model the diffusion time dependence of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and fractional anisotropy (FA) derived from conventional prostate diffusion-weighted imaging methods as used in recommended multiparametric MRI protocols. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) was performed at 9.4 T with three radical prostatectomy specimens, with diffusion times in the range 10-120 ms and b-values 0-3000 s/mm2 . ADC and FA were calculated from DTI measurements at b-values of 800 and 1600 s/mm2 . Independently, a two-component model (restricted isotropic plus Gaussian anisotropic) was used to synthesize DTI data, from which ADC and FA were predicted and compared with the measured values. Measured ADC and FA exhibited a diffusion time dependence, which was closely predicted by the two-component model. ADC decreased by about 0.10-0.15 μm2 /ms as diffusion time increased from 10 to 120 ms. FA increased with diffusion time at b-values of 800 and 1600 s/mm2 but was predicted to be independent of diffusion time at b = 3000 s/mm2 . Both ADC and FA exhibited diffusion time dependence that could be modeled as two unmixed water pools - one having isotropic restricted dynamics, and the other unrestricted anisotropic dynamics. These results highlight the importance of considering and reporting diffusion times in conventional ADC and FA calculations and protocol recommendations, and inform the development of improved diffusion methods for prostate cancer imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roger Bourne
- Discipline of Medical Radiation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, 75 East Street, Lidcomb, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sisi Liang
- Discipline of Medical Radiation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, 75 East Street, Lidcomb, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Eleftheria Panagiotaki
- Discipline of Medical Radiation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, 75 East Street, Lidcomb, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Andre Bongers
- Discipline of Medical Radiation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, 75 East Street, Lidcomb, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Paul Sved
- Discipline of Medical Radiation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, 75 East Street, Lidcomb, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Geoffrey Watson
- Discipline of Medical Radiation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, 75 East Street, Lidcomb, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Feng Z, Min X, Margolis DJA, Duan C, Chen Y, Sah VK, Chaudhary N, Li B, Ke Z, Zhang P, Wang L. Evaluation of different mathematical models and different b-value ranges of diffusion-weighted imaging in peripheral zone prostate cancer detection using b-value up to 4500 s/mm2. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0172127. [PMID: 28199367 PMCID: PMC5310778 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2016] [Accepted: 01/31/2017] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the diagnostic performance of different mathematical models and different b-value ranges of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in peripheral zone prostate cancer (PZ PCa) detection. METHODS Fifty-six patients with histologically proven PZ PCa who underwent DWI-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using 21 b-values (0-4500 s/mm2) were included. The mean signal intensities of the regions of interest (ROIs) placed in benign PZs and cancerous tissues on DWI images were fitted using mono-exponential, bi-exponential, stretched-exponential, and kurtosis models. The b-values were divided into four ranges: 0-1000, 0-2000, 0-3200, and 0-4500 s/mm2, grouped as A, B, C, and D, respectively. ADC, <D>, D*, f, DDC, α, Dapp, and Kapp were estimated for each group. The adjusted coefficient of determination (R2) was calculated to measure goodness-of-fit. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the parameters. RESULTS All parameters except D* showed significant differences between cancerous tissues and benign PZs in each group. The area under the curve values (AUCs) of ADC were comparable in groups C and D (p = 0.980) and were significantly higher than those in groups A and B (p< 0.05 for all). The AUCs of ADC and Kapp in groups B and C were similar (p = 0.07 and p = 0.954), and were significantly higher than the other parameters (p< 0.001 for all). The AUCs of ADC in group D was slightly higher than Kapp (p = 0.002), and both were significantly higher than the other parameters (p< 0.001 for all). CONCLUSIONS ADC derived from conventional mono-exponential high b-value (3200 s/mm2) models is an optimal parameter for PZ PCa detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhaoyan Feng
- Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Xiangde Min
- Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Daniel J. A. Margolis
- Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Caohui Duan
- Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance in Biological Systems, State Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance and Atomic and Molecular Physics, National Center for Magnetic Resonance in Wuhan, Wuhan Institute of Physics and Mathematics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Yuping Chen
- Centers for Biomedical Engineering, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Vivek Kumar Sah
- Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Nabin Chaudhary
- Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Basen Li
- Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Zan Ke
- Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Peipei Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Liang Wang
- Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|