1
|
Keefer-Jacques E, Valente N, Jacko AM, Matwijec G, Reese A, Tekriwal A, Loomes KM, Spinner NB, Gilbert MA. Investigation of cryptic JAG1 splice variants as a cause of Alagille syndrome and performance evaluation of splice predictor tools. HGG ADVANCES 2024; 5:100351. [PMID: 39244638 PMCID: PMC11440345 DOI: 10.1016/j.xhgg.2024.100351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2024] [Revised: 09/03/2024] [Accepted: 09/04/2024] [Indexed: 09/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Haploinsufficiency of JAG1 is the primary cause of Alagille syndrome (ALGS), a rare, multisystem disorder. The identification of JAG1 intronic variants outside of the canonical splice region as well as missense variants, both of which lead to uncertain associations with disease, confuses diagnostics. Strategies to determine whether these variants affect splicing include the study of patient RNA or minigene constructs, which are not always available or can be laborious to design, as well as the utilization of computational splice prediction tools. These tools, including SpliceAI and Pangolin, use algorithms to calculate the probability that a variant results in a splice alteration, expressed as a Δ score, with higher Δ scores (>0.2 on a 0-1 scale) positively correlated with aberrant splicing. We studied the consequence of 10 putative splice variants in ALGS patient samples through RNA analysis and compared this to SpliceAI and Pangolin predictions. We identified eight variants with aberrant splicing, seven of which had not been previously validated. Combining these data with non-canonical and missense splice variants reported in the literature, we identified a predictive threshold for SpliceAI and Pangolin with high sensitivity (Δ score >0.6). Moreover, we showed reduced specificity for variants with low Δ scores (<0.2), highlighting a limitation of these tools that results in the misidentification of true splice variants. These results improve genomic diagnostics for ALGS by confirming splice effects for seven variants and suggest that the integration of splice prediction tools with RNA analysis is important to ensure accurate clinical variant classifications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ernest Keefer-Jacques
- Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Nicolette Valente
- Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Anastasia M Jacko
- Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Grace Matwijec
- Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Apsara Reese
- Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Aarna Tekriwal
- Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Kathleen M Loomes
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Pediatrics, The Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Nancy B Spinner
- Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Melissa A Gilbert
- Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Donelson CJH, Ghiringhelli Borsa N, Taylor AO, Smith RJH, Zhang Y. Functional evaluation of rare variants in complement factor I using a minigene assay. Front Immunol 2024; 15:1446081. [PMID: 39238643 PMCID: PMC11374653 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1446081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2024] [Accepted: 07/30/2024] [Indexed: 09/07/2024] Open
Abstract
The regulatory serine protease, complement factor I (FI), in conjunction with one of its cofactors (FH, C4BP, MCP, or CR1), plays an essential role in controlling complement activity through inactivation of C3b and C4b. The functional impact by missense variants in the CFI gene, particularly those with minor allele frequencies of 0.01% to 0.1%, is infrequently studied. As such, these variants are typically classified as variants of uncertain significance (VUS) when they are identified by clinical testing. Herein, we utilized a minigene splicing assay to assess the functional impact of 36 ultra-rare variants of CFI. These variants were selected based on their minor allele frequencies (MAF) and their association with low-normal FI levels. Four variants lead to aberrant splicing-one 5' consensus splice site (NM_000204.5: c.1429G>C, p.Asp477His) and three exonic changes (c.355G>A, p.Gly119Arg; c.472G>A, p.Gly158Arg; and c.950G>A, p.Arg317Gln)-enabling their reclassification to likely pathogenic (LP) or pathogenic (P) based on ACMG guidelines. These findings underscore the value of functional assays, such as the minigene assay, in assessing the clinical relevance of rare variants in CFI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Richard J. H. Smith
- Molecular Otolaryngology and Renal Research Laboratory, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States
| | - Yuzhou Zhang
- Molecular Otolaryngology and Renal Research Laboratory, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wen D, Hunjan M, Bardhan A, Harper N, Ogboli M, Ozoemena L, Liu L, Fine JD, Chapple I, Balacco DL, Heagerty A. Genotype-Phenotype Correlation in Junctional Epidermolysis Bullosa: Signposts to Severity. J Invest Dermatol 2024; 144:1334-1343.e14. [PMID: 38157931 DOI: 10.1016/j.jid.2023.11.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Revised: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
Junctional epidermolysis bullosa (JEB) is a rare autosomal recessive genodermatosis with a broad spectrum of phenotypes. Current genotype-phenotype paradigms are insufficient to accurately predict JEB subtype and characteristics from genotype, particularly for splice site variants, which account for over a fifth of disease-causing variants in JEB. This study evaluated the genetic and clinical findings from a JEB cohort, investigating genotype-phenotype correlations through bioinformatic analyses and comparison with previously reported variants. Eighteen unique variants in LAMB3, LAMA3, LAMC2, or COL17A1 were identified from 17 individuals. Seven had severe JEB, 9 had intermediate JEB, and 1 had laryngo-onycho-cutaneous syndrome. Seven variants were previously unreported. Deep phenotyping was completed for all intermediate JEB cases and demonstrated substantial variation between individuals. Splice site variants underwent analysis with SpliceAI, a state-of-the-art artificial intelligence tool, to predict resultant transcripts. Predicted functional effects included exon skipping and cryptic splice site activation, which provided potential explanations for disease severity and in most cases correlated with laminin-332 immunofluorescence. RT-PCR was performed for 1 case to investigate resultant transcripts produced from the splice site variant. This study expands the JEB genomic and phenotypic landscape. Artificial intelligence tools show potential for predicting the functional effects of splice site variants and may identify candidates for confirmatory laboratory investigation. Investigation of RNA transcripts will help to further elucidate genotype-phenotype correlations for novel variants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Wen
- Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Adult Epidermolysis Bullosa Unit, Department of Dermatology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Oxford University Clinical Academic Graduate School, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.
| | - Manrup Hunjan
- Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Adult Epidermolysis Bullosa Unit, Department of Dermatology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Department of Dermatology, Walsall Manor Hospital, Walsall, United Kingdom
| | - Ajoy Bardhan
- Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Adult Epidermolysis Bullosa Unit, Department of Dermatology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Natasha Harper
- Adult Epidermolysis Bullosa Unit, Department of Dermatology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Malobi Ogboli
- Paediatric Epidermolysis Bullosa Unit, Department of Paediatric Dermatology, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Linda Ozoemena
- National Diagnostic Epidermolysis Bullosa Laboratory, Synovis, St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Lu Liu
- National Diagnostic Epidermolysis Bullosa Laboratory, Synovis, St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jo-David Fine
- Department of Dermatology, Vanderbilt University Medical Centre, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Iain Chapple
- Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Birmingham Dental Hospital, Birmingham Community Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom; NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre Inflammation Research, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Dario L Balacco
- Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Adrian Heagerty
- Adult Epidermolysis Bullosa Unit, Department of Dermatology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lord J, Oquendo CJ, Wai HA, Douglas AGL, Bunyan DJ, Wang Y, Hu Z, Zeng Z, Danis D, Katsonis P, Williams A, Lichtarge O, Chang Y, Bagnall RD, Mount SM, Matthiasardottir B, Lin C, Hansen TVO, Leman R, Martins A, Houdayer C, Krieger S, Bakolitsa C, Peng Y, Kamandula A, Radivojac P, Baralle D. Predicting the impact of rare variants on RNA splicing in CAGI6. Hum Genet 2024:10.1007/s00439-023-02624-3. [PMID: 38170232 DOI: 10.1007/s00439-023-02624-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Accepted: 11/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
Variants which disrupt splicing are a frequent cause of rare disease that have been under-ascertained clinically. Accurate and efficient methods to predict a variant's impact on splicing are needed to interpret the growing number of variants of unknown significance (VUS) identified by exome and genome sequencing. Here, we present the results of the CAGI6 Splicing VUS challenge, which invited predictions of the splicing impact of 56 variants ascertained clinically and functionally validated to determine splicing impact. The performance of 12 prediction methods, along with SpliceAI and CADD, was compared on the 56 functionally validated variants. The maximum accuracy achieved was 82% from two different approaches, one weighting SpliceAI scores by minor allele frequency, and one applying the recently published Splicing Prediction Pipeline (SPiP). SPiP performed optimally in terms of sensitivity, while an ensemble method combining multiple prediction tools and information from databases exceeded all others for specificity. Several challenge methods equalled or exceeded the performance of SpliceAI, with ultimate choice of prediction method likely to depend on experimental or clinical aims. One quarter of the variants were incorrectly predicted by at least 50% of the methods, highlighting the need for further improvements to splicing prediction methods for successful clinical application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny Lord
- Human Development and Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Htoo A Wai
- Human Development and Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Andrew G L Douglas
- Human Development and Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Oxford Centre for Genomic Medicine, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - David J Bunyan
- Human Development and Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Wessex Regional Genetics Laboratory, Salisbury District Hospital, Salisbury, UK
| | - Yaqiong Wang
- Center for Molecular Medicine, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, National Children's Medical Center, Shanghai, 201102, China
| | - Zhiqiang Hu
- University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA
| | - Zishuo Zeng
- Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, 08873, USA
| | - Daniel Danis
- The Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, 10 Discovery Drive, Farmington, CT, 06032, USA
| | - Panagiotis Katsonis
- Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Amanda Williams
- Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Olivier Lichtarge
- Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Yuchen Chang
- Agnes Ginges Centre for Molecular Cardiology at Centenary Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Richard D Bagnall
- Agnes Ginges Centre for Molecular Cardiology at Centenary Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Stephen M Mount
- Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
| | - Brynja Matthiasardottir
- Graduate Program in Biological Sciences and Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
- Inflammatory Disease Section, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Thomas van Overeem Hansen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Raphael Leman
- Laboratoire de Biologie et Génétique du Cancer, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
- Inserm U1245, Cancer Brain and Genomics, Normandie Université, UNICAEN, FHU G4 génomique, Rouen, France
| | - Alexandra Martins
- Inserm U1245, Cancer Brain and Genomics, Normandie Université, UNIROUEN, FHU G4 génomique, Rouen, France
| | - Claude Houdayer
- Inserm U1245, Cancer Brain and Genomics, Normandie Université, UNIROUEN, FHU G4 génomique, Rouen, France
- Department of Genetics, Univ Rouen Normandie, INSERM U1245, FHU-G4 Génomique and CHU Rouen, 76000, Rouen, France
| | - Sophie Krieger
- Laboratoire de Biologie et Génétique du Cancer, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
- Inserm U1245, Cancer Brain and Genomics, Normandie Université, UNICAEN, FHU G4 génomique, Rouen, France
| | | | - Yisu Peng
- Khoury College of Computer Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Akash Kamandula
- Khoury College of Computer Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Predrag Radivojac
- Khoury College of Computer Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Diana Baralle
- Human Development and Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
- Wessex Clinical Genetics Service, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Smith C, Kitzman JO. Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays. Genome Biol 2023; 24:294. [PMID: 38129864 PMCID: PMC10734170 DOI: 10.1186/s13059-023-03144-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Variants that disrupt mRNA splicing account for a sizable fraction of the pathogenic burden in many genetic disorders, but identifying splice-disruptive variants (SDVs) beyond the essential splice site dinucleotides remains difficult. Computational predictors are often discordant, compounding the challenge of variant interpretation. Because they are primarily validated using clinical variant sets heavily biased to known canonical splice site mutations, it remains unclear how well their performance generalizes. RESULTS We benchmark eight widely used splicing effect prediction algorithms, leveraging massively parallel splicing assays (MPSAs) as a source of experimentally determined ground-truth. MPSAs simultaneously assay many variants to nominate candidate SDVs. We compare experimentally measured splicing outcomes with bioinformatic predictions for 3,616 variants in five genes. Algorithms' concordance with MPSA measurements, and with each other, is lower for exonic than intronic variants, underscoring the difficulty of identifying missense or synonymous SDVs. Deep learning-based predictors trained on gene model annotations achieve the best overall performance at distinguishing disruptive and neutral variants, and controlling for overall call rate genome-wide, SpliceAI and Pangolin have superior sensitivity. Finally, our results highlight two practical considerations when scoring variants genome-wide: finding an optimal score cutoff, and the substantial variability introduced by differences in gene model annotation, and we suggest strategies for optimal splice effect prediction in the face of these issues. CONCLUSION SpliceAI and Pangolin show the best overall performance among predictors tested, however, improvements in splice effect prediction are still needed especially within exons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cathy Smith
- Department of Human Genetics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
- Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Jacob O Kitzman
- Department of Human Genetics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
- Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fraire CR, Mallinger PR, Hatton JN, Kim J, Dickens DS, Argenta PA, Milanovich S, Hartshorne T, Carey DJ, Haley JS, Urban G, Lee J, Hill DA, Stewart DR, Schultz KAP, Chen KS. Intronic Germline DICER1 Variants in Patients With Sertoli-Leydig Cell Tumor. JCO Precis Oncol 2023; 7:e2300189. [PMID: 37883719 PMCID: PMC10860953 DOI: 10.1200/po.23.00189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Revised: 08/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Germline pathogenic loss-of-function (pLOF) variants in DICER1 are associated with a predisposition for a variety of solid neoplasms, including pleuropulmonary blastoma and Sertoli-Leydig cell tumor (SLCT). The most common DICER1 pLOF variants include small insertions or deletions leading to frameshifts, and base substitutions leading to nonsense codons or altered splice sites. Larger deletions and pathogenic missense variants occur less frequently. Identifying these variants can trigger surveillance algorithms with potential for early detection of DICER1-related cancers and cascade testing of family members. However, some patients with DICER1-associated tumors have no pLOF variants detected by germline or tumor testing. Here, we present two patients with SLCT whose tumor sequencing showed only a somatic missense DICER1 RNase IIIb variant. Conventional exon-directed germline sequencing revealed no pLOF variants. Using a custom capture panel, we discovered novel intronic variants, ENST00000343455.7: c.1752+213A>G and c.1509+16A>G, that appear to interfere with normal splicing. We suggest that when no DICER1 pLOF variants or large deletions are discovered in exonic regions despite strong clinical suspicion, intron sequencing and splicing analysis should be performed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Paige R. Mallinger
- International Pleuropulmonary Blastoma (PPB)/DICER1 Registry, Children's Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
- International Ovarian and Testicular Stromal Tumor (OTST) Registry, Children's Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
- Cancer and Blood Disorders, Children's Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Jessica N. Hatton
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD
| | - Jung Kim
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD
| | | | - Peter A. Argenta
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Samuel Milanovich
- Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Sanford Roger Maris Cancer Center, Fargo, ND
| | - Taylor Hartshorne
- Department of Pediatrics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - David J. Carey
- Department of Genomic Health, Geisinger Clinic, Danville, PA
| | - Jeremy S. Haley
- Department of Genomic Health, Geisinger Clinic, Danville, PA
| | - Gretchen Urban
- Department of Genomic Health, Geisinger Clinic, Danville, PA
| | - Jeon Lee
- Lyda Hill Department of Bioinformatics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - D. Ashley Hill
- Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University, St Louis, MO
| | - Douglas R. Stewart
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD
| | - Kris Ann P. Schultz
- International Pleuropulmonary Blastoma (PPB)/DICER1 Registry, Children's Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
- International Ovarian and Testicular Stromal Tumor (OTST) Registry, Children's Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
- Cancer and Blood Disorders, Children's Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Kenneth S. Chen
- Department of Pediatrics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
- Children's Medical Center Research Institute, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Foreman J, Perrett D, Mazaika E, Hunt SE, Ware JS, Firth HV. DECIPHER: Improving Genetic Diagnosis Through Dynamic Integration of Genomic and Clinical Data. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2023; 24:151-176. [PMID: 37285546 PMCID: PMC7615097 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genom-102822-100509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
DECIPHER (Database of Genomic Variation and Phenotype in Humans Using Ensembl Resources) shares candidate diagnostic variants and phenotypic data from patients with genetic disorders to facilitate research and improve the diagnosis, management, and therapy of rare diseases. The platform sits at the boundary between genomic research and the clinical community. DECIPHER aims to ensure that the most up-to-date data are made rapidly available within its interpretation interfaces to improve clinical care. Newly integrated cardiac case-control data that provide evidence of gene-disease associations and inform variant interpretation exemplify this mission. New research resources are presented in a format optimized for use by a broad range of professionals supporting the delivery of genomic medicine. The interfaces within DECIPHER integrate and contextualize variant and phenotypic data, helping to determine a robust clinico-molecular diagnosis for rare-disease patients, which combines both variant classification and clinical fit. DECIPHER supports discovery research, connecting individuals within the rare-disease community to pursue hypothesis-driven research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Foreman
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom; ,
- Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel Perrett
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom; ,
- Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom
| | - Erica Mazaika
- National Heart and Lung Institute and MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; ,
| | - Sarah E Hunt
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom; ,
| | - James S Ware
- National Heart and Lung Institute and MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; ,
- Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Helen V Firth
- Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom
- East Anglian Medical Genetics Service, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom;
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Walker LC, Hoya MDL, Wiggins GAR, Lindy A, Vincent LM, Parsons MT, Canson DM, Bis-Brewer D, Cass A, Tchourbanov A, Zimmermann H, Byrne AB, Pesaran T, Karam R, Harrison SM, Spurdle AB. Using the ACMG/AMP framework to capture evidence related to predicted and observed impact on splicing: Recommendations from the ClinGen SVI Splicing Subgroup. Am J Hum Genet 2023; 110:1046-1067. [PMID: 37352859 PMCID: PMC10357475 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2023.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 69.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2023] [Revised: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/25/2023] Open
Abstract
The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)/Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP) framework for classifying variants uses six evidence categories related to the splicing potential of variants: PVS1, PS3, PP3, BS3, BP4, and BP7. However, the lack of guidance on how to apply such codes has contributed to variation in the specifications developed by different Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) Variant Curation Expert Panels. The ClinGen Sequence Variant Interpretation Splicing Subgroup was established to refine recommendations for applying ACMG/AMP codes relating to splicing data and computational predictions. We utilized empirically derived splicing evidence to (1) determine the evidence weighting of splicing-related data and appropriate criteria code selection for general use, (2) outline a process for integrating splicing-related considerations when developing a gene-specific PVS1 decision tree, and (3) exemplify methodology to calibrate splice prediction tools. We propose repurposing the PVS1_Strength code to capture splicing assay data that provide experimental evidence for variants resulting in RNA transcript(s) with loss of function. Conversely, BP7 may be used to capture RNA results demonstrating no splicing impact for intronic and synonymous variants. We propose that the PS3/BS3 codes are applied only for well-established assays that measure functional impact not directly captured by RNA-splicing assays. We recommend the application of PS1 based on similarity of predicted RNA-splicing effects for a variant under assessment in comparison with a known pathogenic variant. The recommendations and approaches for consideration and evaluation of RNA-assay evidence described aim to help standardize variant pathogenicity classification processes when interpreting splicing-based evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Logan C Walker
- Department of Pathology and Biomedical Science, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Miguel de la Hoya
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, CIBERONC, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, IdISSC (Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos), Madrid, Spain
| | - George A R Wiggins
- Department of Pathology and Biomedical Science, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | | | | | - Michael T Parsons
- Population Health Program, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Daffodil M Canson
- Population Health Program, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | - Alicia B Byrne
- Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Steven M Harrison
- Ambry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, CA, USA; Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
| | - Amanda B Spurdle
- Population Health Program, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Smith C, Kitzman JO. Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.05.04.539398. [PMID: 37205456 PMCID: PMC10187268 DOI: 10.1101/2023.05.04.539398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
Background Variants that disrupt mRNA splicing account for a sizable fraction of the pathogenic burden in many genetic disorders, but identifying splice-disruptive variants (SDVs) beyond the essential splice site dinucleotides remains difficult. Computational predictors are often discordant, compounding the challenge of variant interpretation. Because they are primarily validated using clinical variant sets heavily biased to known canonical splice site mutations, it remains unclear how well their performance generalizes. Results We benchmarked eight widely used splicing effect prediction algorithms, leveraging massively parallel splicing assays (MPSAs) as a source of experimentally determined ground-truth. MPSAs simultaneously assay many variants to nominate candidate SDVs. We compared experimentally measured splicing outcomes with bioinformatic predictions for 3,616 variants in five genes. Algorithms' concordance with MPSA measurements, and with each other, was lower for exonic than intronic variants, underscoring the difficulty of identifying missense or synonymous SDVs. Deep learning-based predictors trained on gene model annotations achieved the best overall performance at distinguishing disruptive and neutral variants. Controlling for overall call rate genome-wide, SpliceAI and Pangolin also showed superior overall sensitivity for identifying SDVs. Finally, our results highlight two practical considerations when scoring variants genome-wide: finding an optimal score cutoff, and the substantial variability introduced by differences in gene model annotation, and we suggest strategies for optimal splice effect prediction in the face of these issues. Conclusion SpliceAI and Pangolin showed the best overall performance among predictors tested, however, improvements in splice effect prediction are still needed especially within exons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cathy Smith
- Department of Human Genetics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Jacob O. Kitzman
- Department of Human Genetics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Walker LC, de la Hoya M, Wiggins GA, Lindy A, Vincent LM, Parsons M, Canson DM, Bis-Brewer D, Cass A, Tchourbanov A, Zimmermann H, Byrne AB, Pesaran T, Karam R, Harrison SM, Spurdle AB. APPLICATION OF THE ACMG/AMP FRAMEWORK TO CAPTURE EVIDENCE RELEVANT TO PREDICTED AND OBSERVED IMPACT ON SPLICING: RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE CLINGEN SVI SPLICING SUBGROUP. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2023:2023.02.24.23286431. [PMID: 36865205 PMCID: PMC9980257 DOI: 10.1101/2023.02.24.23286431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/01/2023]
Abstract
The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP) framework for classifying variants uses six evidence categories related to the splicing potential of variants: PVS1 (null variant in a gene where loss-of-function is the mechanism of disease), PS3 (functional assays show damaging effect on splicing), PP3 (computational evidence supports a splicing effect), BS3 (functional assays show no damaging effect on splicing), BP4 (computational evidence suggests no splicing impact), and BP7 (silent change with no predicted impact on splicing). However, the lack of guidance on how to apply such codes has contributed to variation in the specifications developed by different Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) Variant Curation Expert Panels. The ClinGen Sequence Variant Interpretation (SVI) Splicing Subgroup was established to refine recommendations for applying ACMG/AMP codes relating to splicing data and computational predictions. Our study utilised empirically derived splicing evidence to: 1) determine the evidence weighting of splicing-related data and appropriate criteria code selection for general use, 2) outline a process for integrating splicing-related considerations when developing a gene-specific PVS1 decision tree, and 3) exemplify methodology to calibrate bioinformatic splice prediction tools. We propose repurposing of the PVS1_Strength code to capture splicing assay data that provide experimental evidence for variants resulting in RNA transcript(s) with loss of function. Conversely BP7 may be used to capture RNA results demonstrating no impact on splicing for both intronic and synonymous variants, and for missense variants if protein functional impact has been excluded. Furthermore, we propose that the PS3 and BS3 codes are applied only for well-established assays that measure functional impact that is not directly captured by RNA splicing assays. We recommend the application of PS1 based on similarity of predicted RNA splicing effects for a variant under assessment in comparison to a known Pathogenic variant. The recommendations and approaches for consideration and evaluation of RNA assay evidence described aim to help standardise variant pathogenicity classification processes and result in greater consistency when interpreting splicing-based evidence.
Collapse
|
11
|
Systematic analysis of CNGA3 splice variants identifies different mechanisms of aberrant splicing. Sci Rep 2023; 13:2896. [PMID: 36801918 PMCID: PMC9938885 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-29452-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Achromatopsia is an autosomal recessive cone photoreceptor disease that is frequently caused by pathogenic variants in the CNGA3 gene. Here, we present a systematic functional analysis of 20 CNGA3 splice site variants detected in our large cohort of achromatopsia patients and/or listed in common variant databases. All variants were analyzed by functional splice assays based on the pSPL3 exon trapping vector. We demonstrated that ten variants, both at canonical and non-canonical splice sites, induced aberrant splicing, including intronic nucleotide retention, exonic nucleotide deletion and exon skipping, resulting in 21 different aberrant transcripts. Of these, eleven were predicted to introduce a premature termination codon. The pathogenicity of all variants was assessed based on established guidelines for variant classification. Incorporation of the results of our functional analyses enabled re-classification of 75% of variants previously classified as variants of uncertain significance into either likely benign or likely pathogenic. Our study is the first in which a systematic characterization of putative CNGA3 splice variants has been performed. We demonstrated the utility of pSPL3 based minigene assays in the effective assessment of putative splice variants. Our findings improve the diagnosis of achromatopsia patients, who may thus benefit from future gene-based therapeutic strategies.
Collapse
|
12
|
de Sainte Agathe JM, Filser M, Isidor B, Besnard T, Gueguen P, Perrin A, Van Goethem C, Verebi C, Masingue M, Rendu J, Cossée M, Bergougnoux A, Frobert L, Buratti J, Lejeune É, Le Guern É, Pasquier F, Clot F, Kalatzis V, Roux AF, Cogné B, Baux D. SpliceAI-visual: a free online tool to improve SpliceAI splicing variant interpretation. Hum Genomics 2023; 17:7. [PMID: 36765386 PMCID: PMC9912651 DOI: 10.1186/s40246-023-00451-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 37.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2023] Open
Abstract
SpliceAI is an open-source deep learning splicing prediction algorithm that has demonstrated in the past few years its high ability to predict splicing defects caused by DNA variations. However, its outputs present several drawbacks: (1) although the numerical values are very convenient for batch filtering, their precise interpretation can be difficult, (2) the outputs are delta scores which can sometimes mask a severe consequence, and (3) complex delins are most often not handled. We present here SpliceAI-visual, a free online tool based on the SpliceAI algorithm, and show how it complements the traditional SpliceAI analysis. First, SpliceAI-visual manipulates raw scores and not delta scores, as the latter can be misleading in certain circumstances. Second, the outcome of SpliceAI-visual is user-friendly thanks to the graphical presentation. Third, SpliceAI-visual is currently one of the only SpliceAI-derived implementations able to annotate complex variants (e.g., complex delins). We report here the benefits of using SpliceAI-visual and demonstrate its relevance in the assessment/modulation of the PVS1 classification criteria. We also show how SpliceAI-visual can elucidate several complex splicing defects taken from the literature but also from unpublished cases. SpliceAI-visual is available as a Google Colab notebook and has also been fully integrated in a free online variant interpretation tool, MobiDetails ( https://mobidetails.iurc.montp.inserm.fr/MD ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Madeleine de Sainte Agathe
- Département de Génétique Médicale, Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire de la Pitié Salpêtrière, AP-HP.Sorbonne Université, Laboratoire de Médecine Génomique Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
- Laboratoire de Biologie Médicale Multi-Sites SeqOIA (laboratoire-seqoia.fr/), Paris, France.
| | - Mathilde Filser
- Département de Génétique Médicale, Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire de la Pitié Salpêtrière, AP-HP.Sorbonne Université, Laboratoire de Médecine Génomique Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Bertrand Isidor
- Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Service de Génétique Médicale, 44000, Nantes, France
| | - Thomas Besnard
- Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Service de Génétique Médicale, 44000, Nantes, France
| | - Paul Gueguen
- Laboratoire de Biologie Médicale Multi-Sites SeqOIA (laboratoire-seqoia.fr/), Paris, France
- Service de Génétique, Inserm U1253, CHRU de Tours, Tours, France
| | - Aurélien Perrin
- Laboratoire de Génétique Moléculaire, CHU de Montpellier, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Charles Van Goethem
- Laboratoire de Génétique Moléculaire, CHU de Montpellier, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Camille Verebi
- Service de Médecine Génomique, Maladies de Système et d'Organe, Fédération de Génétique et de Médecine Génomique, DMU BioPhyGen, APHP Centre-Université Paris Cité, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Marion Masingue
- Centre de référence des maladies neuromusculaires Nord/Est/Ile de France, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, APHP, Paris, France
| | - John Rendu
- Inserm, U1216, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Mireille Cossée
- Laboratoire de Génétique Moléculaire, CHU de Montpellier, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
- PhyMedExp, INSERM, CNRS, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Anne Bergougnoux
- Laboratoire de Génétique Moléculaire, CHU de Montpellier, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
- PhyMedExp, INSERM, CNRS, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Laurent Frobert
- Laboratoire de Biologie Médicale Multi-Sites SeqOIA (laboratoire-seqoia.fr/), Paris, France
| | - Julien Buratti
- Département de Génétique Médicale, Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire de la Pitié Salpêtrière, AP-HP.Sorbonne Université, Laboratoire de Médecine Génomique Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Élodie Lejeune
- Département de Génétique Médicale, Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire de la Pitié Salpêtrière, AP-HP.Sorbonne Université, Laboratoire de Médecine Génomique Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Éric Le Guern
- Département de Génétique Médicale, Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire de la Pitié Salpêtrière, AP-HP.Sorbonne Université, Laboratoire de Médecine Génomique Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
- Laboratoire de Biologie Médicale Multi-Sites SeqOIA (laboratoire-seqoia.fr/), Paris, France
| | - Florence Pasquier
- Centre mémoire, Inserm U1172 DistALZ, Licend, Univ Lille, CHU Lille, 59000, Lille, France
| | - Fabienne Clot
- Département de Génétique Médicale, Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire de la Pitié Salpêtrière, AP-HP.Sorbonne Université, Laboratoire de Médecine Génomique Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | | | - Anne-Françoise Roux
- Laboratoire de Génétique Moléculaire, CHU de Montpellier, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
- INM, Univ Montpellier, INSERM, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Benjamin Cogné
- Laboratoire de Biologie Médicale Multi-Sites SeqOIA (laboratoire-seqoia.fr/), Paris, France
- Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Service de Génétique Médicale, 44000, Nantes, France
| | - David Baux
- Laboratoire de Génétique Moléculaire, CHU de Montpellier, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
- INM, Univ Montpellier, INSERM, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Alenezi WM, Fierheller CT, Serruya C, Revil T, Oros KK, Subramanian DN, Bruce J, Spiegelman D, Pugh T, Campbell IG, Mes-Masson AM, Provencher D, Foulkes WD, Haffaf ZE, Rouleau G, Bouchard L, Greenwood CMT, Ragoussis J, Tonin PN. Genetic analyses of DNA repair pathway associated genes implicate new candidate cancer predisposing genes in ancestrally defined ovarian cancer cases. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1111191. [PMID: 36969007 PMCID: PMC10030840 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1111191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Not all familial ovarian cancer (OC) cases are explained by pathogenic germline variants in known risk genes. A candidate gene approach involving DNA repair pathway genes was applied to identify rare recurring pathogenic variants in familial OC cases not associated with known OC risk genes from a population exhibiting genetic drift. Whole exome sequencing (WES) data of 15 OC cases from 13 families tested negative for pathogenic variants in known OC risk genes were investigated for candidate variants in 468 DNA repair pathway genes. Filtering and prioritization criteria were applied to WES data to select top candidates for further analyses. Candidates were genotyped in ancestry defined study groups of 214 familial and 998 sporadic OC or breast cancer (BC) cases and 1025 population-matched controls and screened for additional carriers in 605 population-matched OC cases. The candidate genes were also analyzed in WES data from 937 familial or sporadic OC cases of diverse ancestries. Top candidate variants in ERCC5, EXO1, FANCC, NEIL1 and NTHL1 were identified in 5/13 (39%) OC families. Collectively, candidate variants were identified in 7/435 (1.6%) sporadic OC cases and 1/566 (0.2%) sporadic BC cases versus 1/1025 (0.1%) controls. Additional carriers were identified in 6/605 (0.9%) OC cases. Tumour DNA from ERCC5, NEIL1 and NTHL1 variant carriers exhibited loss of the wild-type allele. Carriers of various candidate variants in these genes were identified in 31/937 (3.3%) OC cases of diverse ancestries versus 0-0.004% in cancer-free controls. The strategy of applying a candidate gene approach in a population exhibiting genetic drift identified new candidate OC predisposition variants in DNA repair pathway genes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wejdan M. Alenezi
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Cancer Research Program, Centre for Translational Biology, The Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Medical Laboratory Technology, Taibah University, Medina, Saudi Arabia
| | - Caitlin T. Fierheller
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Cancer Research Program, Centre for Translational Biology, The Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Corinne Serruya
- Cancer Research Program, Centre for Translational Biology, The Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Timothée Revil
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- McGill Genome Centre, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Kathleen K. Oros
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research of the Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Deepak N. Subramanian
- Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Jeffrey Bruce
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Dan Spiegelman
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Trevor Pugh
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ian G. Campbell
- Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Anne-Marie Mes-Masson
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal and Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Departement of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Diane Provencher
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal and Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - William D. Foulkes
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Cancer Research Program, Centre for Translational Biology, The Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research of the Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Medical Genetics, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Zaki El Haffaf
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal and Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Service de Médecine Génique, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Guy Rouleau
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Luigi Bouchard
- Department of Biochemistry and Functional Genomics, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
- Department of Medical Biology, Centres intégrés universitaires de santé et de services sociaux du Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean hôpital Universitaire de Chicoutimi, Saguenay, QC, Canada
- Centre de Recherche du Centre hospitalier l’Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Celia M. T. Greenwood
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research of the Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Jiannis Ragoussis
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- McGill Genome Centre, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Patricia N. Tonin
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Cancer Research Program, Centre for Translational Biology, The Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- *Correspondence: Patricia N. Tonin,
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Aberrant splicing caused by exonic single nucleotide variants positioned 2nd or 3rd to the last nucleotide in the COL4A5 gene. Clin Exp Nephrol 2023; 27:218-226. [PMID: 36371577 PMCID: PMC9950164 DOI: 10.1007/s10157-022-02294-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2022] [Accepted: 10/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The evident genotype-phenotype correlation shown by the X-linked Alport syndrome warrants the assessment of the impact of identified gene variants on aberrant splicing. We previously reported that single nucleotide variants (SNVs) in the last nucleotide of exons in COL4A5 cause aberrant splicing. It is known that the nucleotides located 2nd and 3rd to the last nucleotides of exons can also play an essential role in the first step of the splicing process. In this study, we aimed to investigate whether SNVs positioned 2nd or 3rd to the last nucleotide of exons in COL4A5 resulted in aberrant splicing. METHODS We selected eight candidate variants: six from the Human Gene Variant Database Professional and two from our cohort. We performed an in-vitro splicing assay and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for messenger RNA obtained from patients, if available. RESULTS The candidate variants were initially classified into the following groups: three nonsense, two missense, and three synonymous variants. Splicing assays and RT-PCR for messenger RNA revealed that six of the eight variants caused aberrant splicing. Four variants, initially classified as non-truncating variants, were found to be truncating ones, which usually show relatively more severe phenotypes. CONCLUSION We revealed that exonic SNVs positioned 2nd or 3rd to the last nucleotide of exons in the COL4A5 were responsible for aberrant splicing. The results of our study suggest that attention should be paid when interpreting the pathogenicity of exonic SNVs near the 5' splice site.
Collapse
|
15
|
Barbosa P, Savisaar R, Carmo-Fonseca M, Fonseca A. Computational prediction of human deep intronic variation. Gigascience 2022; 12:giad085. [PMID: 37878682 PMCID: PMC10599398 DOI: 10.1093/gigascience/giad085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Revised: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The adoption of whole-genome sequencing in genetic screens has facilitated the detection of genetic variation in the intronic regions of genes, far from annotated splice sites. However, selecting an appropriate computational tool to discriminate functionally relevant genetic variants from those with no effect is challenging, particularly for deep intronic regions where independent benchmarks are scarce. RESULTS In this study, we have provided an overview of the computational methods available and the extent to which they can be used to analyze deep intronic variation. We leveraged diverse datasets to extensively evaluate tool performance across different intronic regions, distinguishing between variants that are expected to disrupt splicing through different molecular mechanisms. Notably, we compared the performance of SpliceAI, a widely used sequence-based deep learning model, with that of more recent methods that extend its original implementation. We observed considerable differences in tool performance depending on the region considered, with variants generating cryptic splice sites being better predicted than those that potentially affect splicing regulatory elements. Finally, we devised a novel quantitative assessment of tool interpretability and found that tools providing mechanistic explanations of their predictions are often correct with respect to the ground - information, but the use of these tools results in decreased predictive power when compared to black box methods. CONCLUSIONS Our findings translate into practical recommendations for tool usage and provide a reference framework for applying prediction tools in deep intronic regions, enabling more informed decision-making by practitioners.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pedro Barbosa
- LASIGE, Departamento de Informática, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, 1749-016,, Lisboa, Portugal
- Instituto de Medicina Molecular João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, 1649-028, Lisboa, Portugal
| | | | - Maria Carmo-Fonseca
- Instituto de Medicina Molecular João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, 1649-028, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Alcides Fonseca
- LASIGE, Departamento de Informática, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, 1749-016,, Lisboa, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Suga A, Yoshitake K, Minematsu N, Tsunoda K, Fujinami K, Miyake Y, Kuniyoshi K, Hayashi T, Mizobuchi K, Ueno S, Terasaki H, Kominami T, Nao-I N, Mawatari G, Mizota A, Shinoda K, Kondo M, Kato K, Sekiryu T, Nakamura M, Kusuhara S, Yamamoto H, Yamamoto S, Mochizuki K, Kondo H, Matsushita I, Kameya S, Fukuchi T, Hatase T, Horiguchi M, Shimada Y, Tanikawa A, Yamamoto S, Miura G, Ito N, Murakami A, Fujimaki T, Hotta Y, Tanaka K, Iwata T. Genetic characterization of 1210 Japanese pedigrees with inherited retinal diseases by whole-exome sequencing. Hum Mutat 2022; 43:2251-2264. [PMID: 36284460 DOI: 10.1002/humu.24492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Revised: 09/18/2022] [Accepted: 10/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) comprise a phenotypically and genetically heterogeneous group of ocular disorders that cause visual loss via progressive retinal degeneration. Here, we report the genetic characterization of 1210 IRD pedigrees enrolled through the Japan Eye Genetic Consortium and analyzed by whole exome sequencing. The most common phenotype was retinitis pigmentosa (RP, 43%), followed by macular dystrophy/cone- or cone-rod dystrophy (MD/CORD, 13%). In total, 67 causal genes were identified in 37% (448/1210) of the pedigrees. The first and second most frequently mutated genes were EYS and RP1, associated primarily with autosomal recessive (ar) RP, and RP and arMD/CORD, respectively. Examinations of variant frequency in total and by phenotype showed high accountability of a frequent EYS missense variant (c.2528G>A). In addition to the two known EYS founder mutations (c.4957dupA and c.8805C>G) of arRP, we observed a frequent RP1 variant (c.5797C>T) in patients with arMD/CORD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akiko Suga
- Division of Molecular and Cellular Biology, National Institute of Sensory Organs, National Hospital Organization Tokyo Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazutoshi Yoshitake
- Division of Molecular and Cellular Biology, National Institute of Sensory Organs, National Hospital Organization Tokyo Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.,Laboratory of Aquatic Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Aquatic Bioscience, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naoko Minematsu
- Division of Molecular and Cellular Biology, National Institute of Sensory Organs, National Hospital Organization Tokyo Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazushige Tsunoda
- Division of Vision Research, National Institute of Sensory Organs, National Hospital Organization Tokyo Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kaoru Fujinami
- Division of Vision Research, National Institute of Sensory Organs, National Hospital Organization Tokyo Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Kazuki Kuniyoshi
- Department of Ophthalmology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takaaki Hayashi
- Department of Ophthalmology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kei Mizobuchi
- Department of Ophthalmology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shinji Ueno
- Department of Ophthalmology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.,Department of Ophthalmology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Hiroko Terasaki
- Nagoya University, Institutes of Innovation for Future Society, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Taro Kominami
- Department of Ophthalmology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Nobuhisa Nao-I
- Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, Japan
| | - Go Mawatari
- Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, Japan
| | - Atsushi Mizota
- Department of Ophthalmology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Teikyo, Japan
| | - Kei Shinoda
- Department of Ophthalmology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Teikyo, Japan.,Department of Ophthalmology, Saitama Medical University, Iruma-gun, Japan
| | - Mineo Kondo
- Department of Ophthalmology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Japan
| | - Kumiko Kato
- Department of Ophthalmology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Japan
| | - Tetsuju Sekiryu
- Department of Ophthalmology, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Makoto Nakamura
- Division of Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Sentaro Kusuhara
- Division of Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | | | | | - Kiyofumi Mochizuki
- Department of Ophthalmology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Kondo
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan
| | - Itsuka Matsushita
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan
| | - Shuhei Kameya
- Nippon Medical School Chiba Hokusoh Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Takeo Fukuchi
- Division of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
| | - Tetsuhisa Hatase
- Division of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
| | | | - Yoshiaki Shimada
- Department of Ophthalmology, Fujita Health University, Fujita, Japan
| | - Atsuhiro Tanikawa
- Department of Ophthalmology, Fujita Health University, Fujita, Japan
| | - Shuichi Yamamoto
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Gen Miura
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Nana Ito
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Akira Murakami
- Department of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Bunkyo-ku, Japan
| | - Takuro Fujimaki
- Department of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Bunkyo-ku, Japan.,Kohinata Eye Clinic, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Hotta
- Department of Ophthalmology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Koji Tanaka
- Division of Ophthalmology, Department of Visual Sciences, Nihon University School of Medicine, Chiyoda-ku, Japan
| | - Takeshi Iwata
- Division of Molecular and Cellular Biology, National Institute of Sensory Organs, National Hospital Organization Tokyo Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Comparison of In Silico Tools for Splice-Altering Variant Prediction Using Established Spliceogenic Variants: An End-User’s Point of View. Int J Genomics 2022; 2022:5265686. [PMID: 36275637 PMCID: PMC9584665 DOI: 10.1155/2022/5265686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Revised: 07/18/2022] [Accepted: 08/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Assessing the impact of variants of unknown significance on splicing has become a critical issue and a bottleneck, especially with the widespread implementation of whole-genome or exome sequencing. Although multiple in silico tools are available, the interpretation and application of these tools are difficult and practical guidelines are still lacking. A streamlined decision-making process can facilitate the downstream RNA analysis in a more efficient manner. Therefore, we evaluated the performance of 8 in silico tools (Splice Site Finder, MaxEntScan, Splice-site prediction by neural network, GeneSplicer, Human Splicing Finder, SpliceAI, Splicing Predictions in Consensus Elements, and SpliceRover) using 114 NF1 spliceogenic variants, experimentally validated at the mRNA level. The change in the predicted score incurred by the variant of the nearest wild-type splice site was analyzed, and for type II, III, and IV splice variants, the change in the prediction score of de novo or cryptic splice site was also analyzed. SpliceAI and SpliceRover, tools based on deep learning, outperformed all other tools, with AUCs of 0.972 and 0.924, respectively. For de novo and cryptic splice sites, SpliceAI outperformed all other tools and showed a sensitivity of 95.7% at an optimal cut-off of 0.02 score change. Our results show that deep learning algorithms, especially those of SpliceAI, are validated at a significantly higher rate than other in silico tools for clinically relevant NF1 variants. This suggests that deep learning algorithms outperform traditional probabilistic approaches and classical machine learning tools in predicting the de novo and cryptic splice sites.
Collapse
|
18
|
Artemaki PI, Kontos CK. Alternative Splicing in Human Physiology and Disease. Genes (Basel) 2022; 13:1820. [PMID: 36292705 PMCID: PMC9601896 DOI: 10.3390/genes13101820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 08/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Since the discovery of alternative splicing in the late 1970s, a great number of alternatively spliced transcripts have emerged; this number has exponentially increased with the advances in transcriptomics and massive parallel sequencing technologies [...].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Christos K. Kontos
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Biology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15701 Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Bueno‐Martínez E, Sanoguera‐Miralles L, Valenzuela‐Palomo A, Esteban‐Sánchez A, Lorca V, Llinares‐Burguet I, Allen J, García‐Álvarez A, Pérez‐Segura P, Durán M, Easton DF, Devilee P, Vreeswijk MPG, de la Hoya M, Velasco‐Sampedro EA. Minigene-based splicing analysis and ACMG/AMP-based tentative classification of 56 ATM variants. J Pathol 2022; 258:83-101. [PMID: 35716007 PMCID: PMC9541484 DOI: 10.1002/path.5979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2022] [Revised: 05/11/2022] [Accepted: 06/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
The ataxia telangiectasia-mutated (ATM) protein is a major coordinator of the DNA damage response pathway. ATM loss-of-function variants are associated with 2-fold increased breast cancer risk. We aimed at identifying and classifying spliceogenic ATM variants detected in subjects of the large-scale sequencing project BRIDGES. A total of 381 variants at the intron-exon boundaries were identified, 128 of which were predicted to be spliceogenic. After further filtering, we ended up selecting 56 variants for splicing analysis. Four functional minigenes (mgATM) spanning exons 4-9, 11-17, 25-29, and 49-52 were constructed in the splicing plasmid pSAD. Selected variants were genetically engineered into the four constructs and assayed in MCF-7/HeLa cells. Forty-eight variants (85.7%) impaired splicing, 32 of which did not show any trace of the full-length (FL) transcript. A total of 43 transcripts were identified where the most prevalent event was exon/multi-exon skipping. Twenty-seven transcripts were predicted to truncate the ATM protein. A tentative ACMG/AMP (American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology)-based classification scheme that integrates mgATM data allowed us to classify 29 ATM variants as pathogenic/likely pathogenic and seven variants as likely benign. Interestingly, the likely pathogenic variant c.1898+2T>G generated 13% of the minigene FL-transcript due to the use of a noncanonical GG-5'-splice-site (0.014% of human donor sites). Circumstantial evidence in three ATM variants (leakiness uncovered by our mgATM analysis together with clinical data) provides some support for a dosage-sensitive expression model in which variants producing ≥30% of FL-transcripts would be predicted benign, while variants producing ≤13% of FL-transcripts might be pathogenic. © 2022 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Bueno‐Martínez
- Splicing and Genetic Susceptibility to Cancer, Unidad de Excelencia Instituto de Biología y Genética Molecular, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC‐UVa)ValladolidSpain
| | - Lara Sanoguera‐Miralles
- Splicing and Genetic Susceptibility to Cancer, Unidad de Excelencia Instituto de Biología y Genética Molecular, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC‐UVa)ValladolidSpain
| | - Alberto Valenzuela‐Palomo
- Splicing and Genetic Susceptibility to Cancer, Unidad de Excelencia Instituto de Biología y Genética Molecular, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC‐UVa)ValladolidSpain
| | - Ada Esteban‐Sánchez
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory CIBERONC, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC (Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos)MadridSpain
| | - Víctor Lorca
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory CIBERONC, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC (Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos)MadridSpain
| | - Inés Llinares‐Burguet
- Splicing and Genetic Susceptibility to Cancer, Unidad de Excelencia Instituto de Biología y Genética Molecular, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC‐UVa)ValladolidSpain
| | - Jamie Allen
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary CareUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Alicia García‐Álvarez
- Splicing and Genetic Susceptibility to Cancer, Unidad de Excelencia Instituto de Biología y Genética Molecular, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC‐UVa)ValladolidSpain
| | - Pedro Pérez‐Segura
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory CIBERONC, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC (Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos)MadridSpain
| | - Mercedes Durán
- Cancer Genetics, Instituto de Biología y Genética MolecularValladolidSpain
| | - Douglas F Easton
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary CareUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Peter Devilee
- Department of Human GeneticsLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
| | - Maaike PG Vreeswijk
- Department of Human GeneticsLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
| | - Miguel de la Hoya
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory CIBERONC, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC (Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos)MadridSpain
| | - Eladio A Velasco‐Sampedro
- Splicing and Genetic Susceptibility to Cancer, Unidad de Excelencia Instituto de Biología y Genética Molecular, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC‐UVa)ValladolidSpain
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Restivo C, Le Bras M, Deguigne P, Le Glatin L, Guerry C, Férec C, Le Maréchal C, Beloeil R, Fichou Y. The novel c.634+
4A
>G splicing variant in
RHCE
results in weak C and e antigen expression in a pregnant woman originated from Japan. Transfusion 2022; 62:758-763. [DOI: 10.1111/trf.16811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2021] [Revised: 01/03/2022] [Accepted: 01/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Cynthia Restivo
- Univ Brest, Inserm, EFS, UMR1078, GGB Brest France
- Laboratory of Excellence GR‐Ex Paris France
| | - Myriam Le Bras
- Laboratoire d'Immuno‐Hématologie Etablissement français du sang (EFS) Centre – Pays de la Loire Angers France
| | - Pierre‐Antoine Deguigne
- Laboratoire d'Immuno‐Hématologie Etablissement français du sang (EFS) Centre – Pays de la Loire Angers France
| | - Laurence Le Glatin
- Laboratoire de Biologie Moléculaire des Groupes Sanguins (LBMGS), EFS Bretagne Brest France
| | - Christine Guerry
- Laboratoire de Biologie Moléculaire des Groupes Sanguins (LBMGS), EFS Bretagne Brest France
| | - Claude Férec
- Univ Brest, Inserm, EFS, UMR1078, GGB Brest France
- Service de Génétique Médicale, CHRU Brest Brest France
| | - Cédric Le Maréchal
- Univ Brest, Inserm, EFS, UMR1078, GGB Brest France
- Laboratoire de Biologie Moléculaire des Groupes Sanguins (LBMGS), EFS Bretagne Brest France
- Service de Génétique Médicale, CHRU Brest Brest France
| | - Rémi Beloeil
- Laboratoire de Biologie Moléculaire des Groupes Sanguins (LBMGS), EFS Bretagne Brest France
| | - Yann Fichou
- Univ Brest, Inserm, EFS, UMR1078, GGB Brest France
- Laboratory of Excellence GR‐Ex Paris France
| |
Collapse
|