Thermal Behavior Augments Heat Loss Following Low Intensity Exercise

Estimation of Heat Production Rate using Thermal Data During Exercise in Indoor Environments: A Study of Heat Storage Rate in Male Athletes

The increasing preference for indoor exercise spaces highlights the relationship between indoor thermal environments and physiological responses, particularly concerning thermal comfort during physical activity. Determining the metabolic heat production rate during exercise is essential for optimizing the thermal comfort, well-being, and performance of individuals engaged in physical activities. This value can be determined during the activity using several methods, including direct calorimetry measurement, indirect calorimetry that uses analysis of respiratory gases, or approximations using collected data such as speed, body mass, and heart rate. The study aimed to calculate the metabolic heat production rate by infrared thermal evaluation (ITE) based on the body's thermal balance approach and compare it with the values determined by indirect calorimetry (IC). Fourteen participants volunteered for the study, using a cycling ergometer in a controlled climatic chamber. After the familiarization sessions, maximal O2 intake levels (VO2max) were determined through maximal graded exercise tests. Subsequently, constant work rate exercise tests were performed at 60% of VO2max for 20 min. The metabolic heat production rates were calculated by IC and ITE for each athlete individually. Respiratory gases were used to determine IC, while body skin and core temperatures, along with physical environmental data, were applied to calculate ITE using the human body thermal balance approximation of ASHRAE. According to the results, heat storage rates were misleading among the body's heat transfer modes, particularly during the first 8 min of the exercise. ITE showed a moderate level of correlation with IC (r: 0.03-0.86) with a higher level of dispersion relative to the mean (CV%: 12-84%). Therefore, a new equation (ITEnew) for the heat storage rates was proposed using the experimental data from this study. The results showed that ITEnew provided more precise estimations for the entire exercise period (p > 0.05). Correlations between ITEnew and IC values were consistently strong throughout the exercise period (r: 0.62-0.85). It can be suggested that ITEnew values can predict IC during the constant work rate steady-state exercise.

The requirement for physical effort reduces voluntary cooling behavior during heat exposure in humans

We tested the hypothesis that cool-seeking behavior during heat exposure is attenuated when physical effort is required. Twelve healthy adults (mean(SD), 24(4) years, four women) underwent three experimental trials during two hours of exposure to 41(1) °C, 20(0)% relative humidity in which subjects undertook intermittent exercise alternating between seated rest and cycling exercise at ~4 metabolic equivalents every 15 min. In all trials, subjects wore a water perfused suit top. In the control trial (Control), no water perfused the suit. In the other trials, subjects were freely able to perfuse 2.1(0.2) °C water through the suit. In one cooling trial, subjects received two minutes of cooling by pressing a button (Button). The other cooling trial permitted cooling by engaging in isometric handgrip exercise at 15% of maximal grip strength (Handgrip), with cooling maintained throughout the duration the required force was produced or until two minutes elapsed. In both Button and Handgrip, a one-minute washout proceeded cooling. Core temperature increased over time in all trials (P<0.01) and there were no differences between trials (P = 0.32). Mean skin temperature at the end of heat exposure was lowest in Button [34.2(1.5) °C] compared to Handgrip [35.6(0.8) °C, P = 0.03] and Control [36.9(0.7) °C, P<0.01]. The total number of behaviors [8(3) vs. 10(5), P = 0.04] and cumulative cooling time [850(323) vs. 1230(616) seconds, P = 0.02] were lower in Handgrip compared to Button. These data indicate that when physical effort is required, the incidence and duration of cooling behavior during heat exposure is attenuated compared to when behaving requires minimal physical effort.

Cooling Capacity of Transpulmonary Cooling and Cold-Water Immersion After Exercise-Induced Hyperthermia

CONTEXT

Cold-water immersion (CWI) may not be feasible in some remote settings, prompting the identification of alternative cooling methods as adjunct treatment modalities for exertional heat stroke (EHS).

OBJECTIVE

To determine the differences in cooling capacities between CWI and the inspiration of cooled air.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled clinical trial.

SETTING

Laboratory.

PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS

A total of 12 recreationally active participants (7 men, 5 women; age = 26 ± 4 years, height = 170.6 ± 10.1 cm, mass = 76.0 ± 18.0 kg, body fat = 18.5% ± 9.7%, peak oxygen uptake = 42.7 ± 8.9 mL·kg-1·min-1).

INTERVENTION(S)

After exercise in a hot environment (40°C and 40% relative humidity), participants were randomized to 3 cooling conditions: cooling during passive rest (PASS; control), CWI, and the Polar Breeze thermal rehabilitation machine (PB) with which participants inspired cooled air (22.2°C ± 1.0°C).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Rectal temperature (TREC) and heart rate were continuously measured throughout cooling until TREC reached 38.25°C.

RESULTS

Cooling rates during CWI (0.18°C·min-1 ± 0.06°C·min-1) were greater than those during PASS (mean difference [95% confidence interval] of 0.16°C·min-1 [0.13°C·min-1, 0.19°C·min-1]; P < .001) and PB (0.15°C·min-1 [0.12°C·min-1, 0.16°C·min-1]; P < .001). Elapsed time to reach a TREC of 38.25°C was also faster with CWI (9.71 ± 3.30 minutes) than PASS (-58.1 minutes [-77.1, -39.9 minutes]; P < .001) and PB (-46.8 minutes [-65.5, -28.2 minutes]; P < .001). Differences in cooling rates and time to reach a TREC of 38.25°C between PASS and PB were not different (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Transpulmonary cooling via cooled-air inhalation did not promote an optimal cooling rate (>0.15°C·min-1) for the successful treatment of EHS. In remote settings where EHS is a risk, access and use of treatment methods via CWI or cold-water dousing are imperative to ensuring survival.

TRIAL REGISTRY

ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT0419026).

Human thermoregulation during prolonged exposure to warm and extremely humid environments expected to occur in disabled submarine scenarios

Military and civilian emergency situations often involve prolonged exposures to warm and very humid environments. We tested the hypothesis that increases in core temperature and body fluid losses during prolonged exposure to warm and very humid environments are dependent on dry bulb temperature. On three occasions, 15 healthy males (23 ± 3 yr) sat in 32.1 ± 0.1°C, 33.1 ± 0.2°C, or 35.0 ± 0.1°C and 95 ± 2% relative humidity normobaric environments for 8 h. Core temperature (telemetry pill) and percent change in body weight, an index of changes in total body water occurring secondary to sweat loss, were measured every hour. Linear regression models were fit to core temperature (over the final 4 h) and percent changes in body weight (over the entire 8 h) for each subject. These equations were used to predict core temperature and percent changes in body weight for up to 24 h. At the end of the 8-h exposure, core temperature was higher in 35°C (38.2 ± 0.4°C, P < 0.01) compared with 32°C (37.2 ± 0.2°C) and 33°C (37.5 ± 0.2°C). At this time, percent changes in body weight were greater in 35°C (-1.9 ± 0.5%) compared with 32°C (-1.4 ± 0.3%, P < 0.01) but not 33°C (-1.6 ± 0.6%, P = 0.17). At 24 h, predicted core temperature was higher in 35°C (39.2 ± 1.4°C, P < 0.01) compared with 32°C (37.6 ± 0.9°C) and 33°C (37.5 ± 0.9°C), and predicted percent changes in body weight were greater in 35°C (-6.1 ± 2.4%) compared with 32°C (-4.6 ± 1.5%, P = 0.04) but not 33°C (-5.3 ± 2.0%, P = 0.43). Prolonged exposure to 35°C, but not 32°C or 33°C, dry bulb temperatures and high humidity is uncompensable heat stress, which exacerbates body fluid losses.

Increased skin wetness independently augments cool-seeking behaviour during passive heat stress

KEY POINTS

Skin wetness occurring secondary to the build-up of sweat on the skin provokes thermal discomfort, the precursor to engaging in cool-seeking behaviour. Associative evidence indicates that skin wetness stimulates cool-seeking behaviour to a greater extent than increases in core and mean skin temperatures. The independent contribution of skin wetness to cool-seeking behaviour during heat stress has never been established. We demonstrate that skin wetness augments cool-seeking behaviour during passive heat stress independently of differential increases in skin temperature and core temperature. We also identify that perceptions of skin wetness were not elevated despite increases in actual skin wetness. These data support the proposition that afferent signalling from skin wetness enhances the desire to engage in cool-seeking behaviour during passive heat stress.

ABSTRACT

This study tested the hypothesis that elevations in skin wetness augments cool-seeking behaviour during passive heat stress. Twelve subjects (6 females, age: 24 ± 2 y) donned a water-perfused suit circulating 34 °C water and completed two trials resting supine in a 28.5 ± 0.4 °C environment. The trials involved a 20 min baseline period (26 ± 3% relative humidity (RH)), 60 min while ambient humidity was maintained at 26±3% RH (LOW) or increased to 67 ± 5% RH (HIGH), followed by 60 min passive heat stress (HS) where the water temperature in the suit was incrementally increased to 50 °C. Subjects were able to seek cooling when their neck was thermally uncomfortable by pressing a button. Each button press initiated 30 s of -20 °C fluid perfusing through a custom-made device secured against the skin on the dorsal neck. Mean skin (T_skin ) and core (T_core ) temperatures, mean skin wetness (W_skin ) and neck device temperature (T_device ) were measured continuously. Cool-seeking behaviour was determined from total time receiving cooling (TT_cool ) and cumulative button presses. T_skin and T_core increased during HS (P < 0.01) but were not different between conditions (P ≥ 0.11). W_skin was elevated in HIGH vs. LOW during HS (60 min: by + 0.06 ± 0.07 a.u., P ≤ 0.04). T_device was lower in HIGH vs. LOW at 40-50 min of HS (P ≤ 0.01). TT_cool was greater for HIGH (330 ± 172 s) vs. LOW (225 ± 167 s, P < 0.01), while the number of cumulative button presses was greater from 40-60 min in HS for HIGH vs. LOW (P ≤ 0.04). Increased skin wetness amplifies the engagement in cool-seeking behaviour during passive heat stress.