Impact of Activity-Based Working and Height-Adjustable Desks on Physical Activity, Sedentary Behavior, and Space Utilization among Office Workers: A Natural Experiment

Impact of structural-level environmental interventions on physical activity: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effectiveness of structural-level environmental interventions on the changes in PA levels in the populations examined.

METHODS

Natural experiments that involve environmental intervention with structural modification were included. The primary outcome PA levels with consideration of both objective and subjective measurements. An electronic search was carried out in Medline/Pubmed, SCIENCE DIRECT, WEB OF SCIENCE, and CINAHL up to January 2022. Two reviewers screened titles and abstracts, selected studies, extracted relevant data, and examined study quality. A qualitative synthesis was performed.

RESULTS

Twenty-six articles were included. The structural-level environmental interventions included 4 fundamental areas: schools, work environments, streets or cities, and neighborhoods or parks. Of the 26 studies, 21 examined outdoor environments like parks, cities, pedestrian walkways, or steps, while 5 examined indoor or closed environments like schools and workplaces revealing that structural-level environmental interventions improve PA levels with the greatest effect in parks and active transportation. A risk of bias is inherent in natural experiments which is a limitation of this study. In schools and work areas, there is evidence of both decrease in sedentary time and an increase in PA related to environmental modifications.

CONCLUSION

Structural-level environmental modifications in parks and active transportation demonstrated greater effects in promoting PA. Environmental modifications can impact physical activity in the population. Given that the economic and cultural setting is a key variable when considering the effectiveness of structural interventions, and since only 1 of the 26 reviewed articles included such data, more studies examining economic factors are needed especially in low- and middle-income countries like in South America.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42021229718.

Betriebliche Gesundheitsförderung (BGF) im Laufe der Zeit

Hintergrund

Zur Qualitätssicherung und Weiterentwicklung von BGF-Maßnahmen (betriebliche Gesundheitsförderung) ist es von Interesse, einen Überblick über wissenschaftlich untersuchte BGF-Maßnahmen in den letzten zwei Jahrzehnten zu erlangen.

Zielsetzung

Wissenschaftlich evaluierte BGF-Maßnahmen aus den Jahren 2000–2020 werden mithilfe der in der Praxis durch den GKV-Spitzenverband eingesetzten Themenfelder auf die thematischen Entwicklungen, den Nutzen, aber auch die Schwächen für die Übertragbarkeit in die Praxis hin analysiert.

Methode

Eine systematische Literaturrecherche für den Publikationszeitraum zwischen 2000 und 2020 wurde in zwei elektronischen Datenbanken durchgeführt.

Ergebnisse

Die Einschlusskriterien erfüllten 41 Artikel. Die meisten der in den Studien durchgeführten und evaluierten BGF-Maßnahmen waren keine Einzelmaßnahmen, sondern stellten Programme dar. In ihnen wurden mehrere Themenfelder gleichzeitig adressiert. Insgesamt zeigten sich die in den Studien untersuchten BGF-Maßnahmen sehr heterogen. Zum Ende des Untersuchungszeitraumes nahm die Anzahl an Publikationen zu.

Schlussfolgerung

Die im Leitfaden Prävention vorgegebenen BGF-Themenfelder sind bis auf ein Themenfeld ausgewogen vertreten. Die Studien zu den BGF-Maßnahmen sind bezogen auf die Verständlichkeit der angewendeten Didaktik und Methodik oft nur eingeschränkt nachvollziehbar und somit schwer in die organisationale Praxis übertragbar.

Enhancing motivation and psychological wellbeing in the workplace through conscious physical activity: Suggestions from a qualitative study examining workers' experience

Introduction

After COVID-19 restrictions, hybrid solutions were established that combined smart working and work in presence. Workplace conditions significantly impact employees' lives, particularly in terms of meeting their needs and promoting their wellbeing. Based on a socio-ecological and multilevel methodology, the UP150 concept (Proactive Office 150) represents a possible innovative solution to meet employees' needs and valorize flexible work. It encourages physical exercise and active breaks during the typical workday by using particular architectural modifications, a dedicated App, and physical activity professionals as wellness coaches. The present study is the last step of the preliminary actions planned to check the benefits of the UP150 concept and aims to explore the workers' perceptions after experiencing this project.

Methods

The qualitative analysis of a preliminary survey (concerning information about the company structure and workers' habits) performed before conducting a randomized controlled trial intervention study and the analysis of the semi-structured interviews after 8 weeks of a UP150 experience served as datasets for this study and have been examined and discussed.

Results

In the preliminary survey, the young (under 40) and generally active (57% of the workers) reported being motivated to exercise but inhibited by a lack of time and a heavy workload. After 8 weeks at a modified workplace designed in accordance with the motive behind the UP150, the workers displayed noticeable positive perceptions and appreciation.

Discussion

The qualitative analysis confirmed and supported the effectiveness of the UP150 concept that previous research had already found in quantitative parameters related to employees' motor efficiency, psychophysical status, and amount of physical activity. Participants reported beneficial perceived effects on their wellness and psychophysical status following a UP150 experience. Moreover, the concept improved social relationships and increased motivation. In conclusion, the UP150 concept efficiently fostered a positive perception of physical exercise and directed the employees toward the assumption of healthy behaviors fitting the physical literacy paradigm.

Office-workers maintain decreased workplace sitting time long-term following participation in a sit-stand desk intervention study

Previous studies report decreased workplace sitting time when standing desk interventions are provided to office workers. It is unclear whether decreased sedentary behaviours are maintained long-term. This was a follow-up to a previous intervention study to investigate whether observed sitting time decreases of 30-50% were sustained 12-24 months later. A secondary aim was to compare overall physical activity between office workers with and without standing desks. Although sitting time increased over the follow-up period, this did not reach significance and reductions in workplace sitting remained significantly lower (23.5% decrease) from baseline values. There were no differences in the physical activity measures between workers with and without access to standing desks, although this was a small sample size and further research is needed. Individuals who are motivated to try standing desks at work can benefit through decreased sitting time long-term, however this may not extend to increased overall physical activity levels. Practitioner summary: Providing standing desk options to office-based employees can have long-lasting impacts with reducing sitting time at work. Office workers who choose to stand at work do not appear to compensate with overall activity level reduction outside of work.Abbreviations: LBP: low back pain; OSPAQ: occupational sitting and physical activity questionnaire; VAS: visual analog scale; ANOVA: analysis of variance; BMI: body mass index; ICC: intraclass correlation coefficient.

Healthy lifestyle interventions across diverse workplaces: a summary of the current evidence

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Workplaces provide a unique opportunity to deliver health promotion interventions to their workers. This review summarizes evidence from the most recent studies (September 2019 to April 2021) of workplace healthy lifestyle interventions and identifies gaps in the literature and key aspects for successful future workplace lifestyle interventions.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent intervention studies have focused on four health domains: (1) multicomponent wellness programs, (2) healthy diet interventions, (3) physical activity interventions, and (4) mental health/sleep interventions. Within each group of studies, there was significant heterogeneity in study length, intervention components, and worker populations. Nonetheless, most studies across all categories showed positive associations between healthy lifestyle interventions and improved worker health.

SUMMARY

Although recent literature has shown an overall positive trend between healthy lifestyle interventions implemented at the workplace and improvements in markers of health and wellbeing, further research should include longer follow-up periods, more objective measures of wellbeing, evaluation of worker performance, and analogous interventions between studies to identify the most effective interventions to improve worker health and wellness.

Impact of Ergonomics on Cardiometabolic Risk in Office Workers: Transition to Activity-Based Working With Height-Adjustable Desk

OBJECTIVE

Ergonomic office redesigning possibly improves physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SB); however, its impact on cardiometabolic risk has not yet been determined. This study aimed to examine the effect of office relocation on cardiometabolic risk factors.

METHODS

Annual health check-up data of 95 office workers from four offices in Tokyo, Japan, who relocated to an office with activity-based working (ABW) and height-adjustable desk (HAD) and a propensity-score matched control-cohort were analyzed. PA and SB on weekdays were measured only in the relocation group before and 10 months after relocation.

RESULTS

Significant interactions were observed for waist circumference, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c). HbA1c changes showed a significant negative association with moderate-to-vigorous-intensity PA.

CONCLUSION

An ABW office with HAD improves cardiometabolic risk factors in office workers, possibly through changes in PA and SB.

Associations of working from home with occupational physical activity and sedentary behavior under the COVID-19 pandemic

OBJECTIVES

To compare physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SB) levels during work time between those who work from home (WFH) and at workplaces (no WFH), and by WFH subgroups.

METHODS

This cross-sectional internet-based survey included 1239 workers (mean age [standard deviation], 44.7 [13.7] years; 59.2% men) living in the Tokyo Metropolitan Area. Time spent sitting (SB), standing (light-intensity PA; LPA), walking, and engaging in heavy labor (moderate-to-vigorous PA; MVPA) during work time was measured using the Work-related Physical Activity Questionnaire. Workers reported weekly WFH percentages (eg, 0% implies no WFH and 100% implies full WFH), and WFH percentages were categorized into no WFH (0% WFH) and WFH (1%-100% WFH) groups. The WFH group was further subcategorized into 1%-25%, 26%-50%, 51%-75%, and 76%-100% subgroups.

RESULTS

Overall, 494 workers (39.9%) worked from home. During working hours, SB time was longer in the WFH group than in the no WFH group (mean minutes [% working-time SB]: 335.7 vs 224.7 min [74% vs 50%]). Significantly shorter LPA and MVPA times (%) were reported in the WFH group than in the no WFH group (LPA, 59.6 vs 122.9 min [14% vs 29%]; MVPA, 55.3 vs 91.9 min [13% vs 22%], all P < .001). Among the WFH subgroups, longer SB time and shorter LPA and MVPA times were observed in the highest WFH group (WFH 76%-100%) than in the WFH 1%-25% and 26%-50% subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Workers who telecommuted were less physically active and had longer sedentary during work time than those who worked at the workplaces.